ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Immunol.
Sec. Nutritional Immunology
Association between Immuno-nutritional Biomarkers and Mortality in Hospitalized Geriatric population
Provisionally accepted- Department of Geriatrics, Healthy Ageing Research Centre (HARC), Medical University of Lodz., LODZ, Poland
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Objectives: This study aimed to identify the most sensitive immuno-nutritional and systemic inflammation biomarkers for predicting in-hospital all-cause mortality in older adults. Methods and material: A retrospective observational study was conducted in 2,067 hospitalized geriatric patients aged ≥60 years in the Department of Geriatrics, Lodz, Poland, from 2017 to 2024. Blood-based immuno-nutritional indices were calculated from routine laboratory tests at admission, including NLR (Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio), LMR (Lymphocyte-to-Monocyte Ratio), PNI (Prognostic Nutritional Index), PLR (Platelet-to-Lymphocyte Ratio), LCR (Lymphocyte-to-C-Reactive Protein Ratio), DLR (D-dimer-to-Lymphocyte Ratio), MWR (Monocyte-to-White Blood Cell Ratio), SII (Systemic Immune-Inflammation Index), SIRI (Systemic Inflammation Response Index), CAR (C-Reactive Protein-to-Albumin Ratio), DAR (D-dimer to Albumin Ratio), PAR (Platelet-to-Albumin Ratio), NAR (Neutrophil-to-Albumin Ratio), PIV (Pan-Immune-Inflammation Value), C-Reactive Protein (CRP) and White Blood Cell (WBC) count. Differences between survivors and non-survivors were analyzed using Mann–Whitney U and Chi-square tests. Prognostic accuracy was assessed via Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, with statistical significance set at p ≤ 0.05. Additionally, multivariable logistic regression, calibration assessment, and 10-fold cross-validation were used to confirm the robustness and internal validity of prognostic models. Results: The mean age was 80.88 ± 8.33 years for men and 82.92 ± 7.72 years for women. Men had higher levels of inflammatory biomarkers (NLR, SIRI, CAR), while women exhibited better nutritional and immune profiles (higher PNI, LMR). Non-survivors of both sexes showed significantly higher NLR, PLR, DLR, SII, SIRI, CAR, DAR, PAR, NAR and PIV, and significantly lower levels of LMR, PNI, LCR and MWR compared to survivors (p < 0.001). The Prognostic Nutritional Index (PNI) demonstrated the highest predictive value for in-hospital mortality (AUC = 0.837; sensitivity = 0.88, specificity = 0.64), followed by CAR and LCR. Other indices, including DLR, DAR, and NAR, also showed significant but comparatively lower predictive accuracy. In multivariable analysis, age, PNI, LCR, and NAR remained independent predictors of mortality (AUC for final model = 0.852). Conclusion: This study highlights PNI as the most sensitive and reliable biomarker for predicting in-hospital mortality among older adults. These results support using PNI and inflammatory markers in clinical assessments to better identify high-risk geriatric patients and reduce mortality
Keywords: Prognostic nutritional index (PNI), immunonutritional biomarkers, Aging, Immuneresponse, In-hospital mortality
Received: 25 Aug 2025; Accepted: 28 Oct 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Stephenson, Kravchenko, Skarbek, Kostka and Sołtysik. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Bartłomiej K. Sołtysik, bartlomiej.soltysik@umed.lodz.pl
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
