Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Immunol.

Sec. Cancer Immunity and Immunotherapy

Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1693249

The Impact of β-Blockers on Outcomes of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors Therapy in Advanced Lung Cancer: A Multicenter Real-World Study

Provisionally accepted
Lingdan  ChangLingdan Chang1Haitian  ZhangHaitian Zhang2Yunxia  LiYunxia Li3Jilan  YangJilan Yang3Ya  LiYa Li4Guangming  WangGuangming Wang5Jinsong  ZhangJinsong Zhang1*Hongjin  ShiHongjin Shi1*Bing  HaiBing Hai1*
  • 1The Second Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Kunming, China
  • 2UCSI University Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Federal Territory of Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
  • 3Yunnan Cancer Hospital, Kunming, China
  • 4Yan'an Hospital Affiliated To Kunming Medical University, Kunming, China
  • 5Qujing Vocational and Technical College, Qujing, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have improved outcomes in advanced lung cancer. β-adrenergic signaling may promote tumor initiation and progression, and β-blockers (BBs) have emerged as anti-tumor sensitizing agents. This study evaluates the impact of BBs use during ICIs treatment in advanced lung cancer. Methods: This multicenter retrospective real-world study included 462 patients treated with ICIs from June 2019 to December 2024. Patients were divided into BBs and No BBs groups. Primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS); efficacy evaluation and objective response rate (ORR) were secondary. Propensity score matching (PSM) balances baseline characteristics. Kaplan–Meier method, Cox, and logistic regression models were used for survival and multivariate analyses. Subgroup analyses assessed clinical factors. A P value < 0.05 is considered statistically significant. Results: After PSM, 318 patients were included (88 BBs, 230 No BBs). BBs use was associated with longer median PFS (mPFS) (15.8 vs. 11.8 months; HR = 0.67, 95% CI: 0.49–0.92, P = 0.038) and higher ORR (51.1% vs. 35.2%, P = 0.014), but not improved median OS (mOS) (29.0 vs. 31.5 months; HR = 1.38, 95% CI: 0.93–2.03, P = 0.108). BBs use independently predicted improved ORR (OR = 0.45, 95% CI: 0.26–0.78, P = 0.004) and longer PFS (HR = 0.67, 95% CI: 0.49–0.92, P = 0.014). In patients with cardiovascular comorbidities (CVD), BBs use was linked to longer mPFS (15.8 vs. 10.9 months, P = 0.0066) and higher ORR(51.1% vs 27.0%, P< 0.001), with no mOS difference (P = 0.82). Among non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients, mPFS (17.5 vs. 12.3 months, P = 0.04) and ORR (56.0% vs 35.9%, P = 0.004) were also improved in the BBs group, whereas OS did not differ significantly (P = 0.3). Conclusion: In stage-advanced lung cancer, BBs combined with ICIs were associated with improved ORR and prolonged PFS, but did not significantly improve OS. PFS and ORR benefits were also observed in patients with CVD or NSCLC. Further prospective studies are needed to validate these findings and clarify whether BBs directly contribute to ICIs' efficacy.

Keywords: lung cancer, Immunotherapy, immune checkpoint inhibitors, β-adrenergic signaling, β-blockers

Received: 26 Aug 2025; Accepted: 09 Oct 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Chang, Zhang, Li, Yang, Li, Wang, Zhang, Shi and Hai. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence:
Jinsong Zhang, 945933392zjs@sina.com
Hongjin Shi, 20190797@kmmu.edu.cn
Bing Hai, binghai999@163.com

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.