Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Immunol.

Sec. Vaccines and Molecular Therapeutics

Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1697829

This article is part of the Research TopicInnovative Immunological Strategies for Overcoming Antimicrobial Resistance and Enhancing Vaccine DevelopmentView all 3 articles

Integrated immunodominant epitope discovery for dual-purpose rapid and economical diagnostic and immunoprotective applications against MRSA

Provisionally accepted
Zhuo  ZhaoZhuo Zhao1*Long  long ChenLong long Chen1Peng  ju YanPeng ju Yan1Lian  Li DuanLian Li Duan1Guang  yang MingGuang yang Ming1Xiao  qiong WangXiao qiong Wang1Jinyong  ZhangJinyong Zhang1Zhi  fu ChenZhi fu Chen1Qiang  GouQiang Gou1Yue  YuanYue Yuan1Hai  ming JingHai ming Jing1Ping  ChengPing Cheng1Ping  LuoPing Luo1Zeng  HaoZeng Hao1Zhi  yong LiuZhi yong Liu2Quanming  ZouQuanming Zou1
  • 1Army Medical University, Chongqing, China
  • 2Department of Laboratory Medicine, Southwest Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Current diagnostic and preventive strategies against Staphylococcus aureus methicillin-resistant strains (MRSA) remain inadequate. Hence, we aimed to identify candidate epitopes as potential therapeutic targets and diagnostic biomarkers. We focused on clinically validated targets and investigated four antigens (Hla, SEB, MntC, and IsdB) currently incorporated into phase III clinical trials of a recombinant five-antigen vaccine (termed rFSAV) and the recently identified leukocidin LukG. Using convalescent serum samples from patients with clinically confirmed MRSA, we identified 10 immunodominant epitopes through ELISA screening of overlapping 18-mer peptides, seven of which named MntC55-72, MntC121-138, MntC271-285, SEB37-54, LukG30-47, LukG235-252, and LukG246-263 have not been previously reported. Immunoprotection trials showed that five epitopes Hla168–185, IsdB384–401, MntC55–72, SEB37–54, and LukG235–252 elicited effective protection in a BALB/c murine sepsis model infected with MRSA252. The combination of these protective epitopes exhibited broad-spectrum efficacy against both the MRSA252 strain and phylogenetically distinct clinical isolates. Diagnostically, the performance of the epitope panel was superior to that of conventional culture methods with a sensitivity of 0.839 and specificity of 0.826 in a 3-h detection window, thus offering rapid and cost-effective advantages. Notably, bioinformatic analysis showed that all identified B-cell epitopes contained predicted CD4+ T-cell epitope sequences, which suggests the potential to elicit combined T–B cell immune responses through MHC-II presentation. Thus, these immunodominant epitopes with dual functions that integrate both diagnostic and immunoprotective capabilities could function as a novel immunodiagnostic toolkit that enables rapid MRSA detection and aid in establishing a multi-epitope vaccine platform. These findings present an integrated strategy that bridges diagnostic development and vaccine design for MRSA management.

Keywords: Staphylococcus aureus, immunodominant epitope, Lethal sepsis, diagnostic, Vaccine

Received: 02 Sep 2025; Accepted: 30 Sep 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Zhao, Chen, Yan, Duan, Ming, Wang, Zhang, Chen, Gou, Yuan, Jing, Cheng, Luo, Hao, Liu and Zou. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Zhuo Zhao, zhaozhuo198309@163.com

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.