REVIEW article
Front. Immunol.
Sec. Antigen Presenting Cell Biology
Dendritic Cell Maturation Assay For Non-Clinical Immunogenicity Risk Assessment: Best Practices Recommended By The European Immunogenicity Platform
Provisionally accepted- 1IQVIA Laboratories In Vitro Immunology (ImmunXperts), Gosselies, Belgium
- 2Lonza: Early Development Services, Lonza Biologics Inc, Cambridge, MA, United States
- 3Sandoz: Clinical Bioanalytics, Global Clinical Development, Hexal AG (a Sandoz company), Holzkirchen, Germany
- 4Abzena: Bioassay Department, Abzena Ltd, Babraham Research Campus, Cambridge, United Kingdom
- 5Novartis: Immunogenicity and Mechanistic Immunology, Biomedical Research, Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland
- 6Roche: Pharmaceutical Sciences, Roche Innovation Center Basel, Basel, Switzerland
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Early assessment and mitigation of non-clinical immunogenicity risk during early drug development is key for the development of safe and efficacious therapeutics. The dendritic cell (DC) maturation assay, one of the non-clinical immunogenicity risk assessment tools used in the drug development pipeline, investigates the ability of a test article to induce the maturation of immature monocyte-derived DCs, serving as an indicator of factors that may initiate an innate immune response and contribute to an adaptive immune response. These factors can be either intrinsic to the therapeutic's mechanism of action and structure, or extrinsic from the final drug product, such as formulation components or contamination with host cell proteins or other impurities. Due to the nature of the assay, key parameters such as cell source, cell culture conditions, reagents, and assay-specific defined criteria for baseline response and positivity can differ amongst laboratories. In this manuscript, the specifics of this assay are discussed, key quality criteria for robustness are described, and the selection of appropriate controls to enable meaningful data interpretation are presented. The aim of conducting the DC maturation assay using best practices is to improve the assay to be fit-for-purpose and to facilitate comparability across projects and between laboratories.
Keywords: Dendritic Cells, maturation assay, Immunogenicity, Risk Assessment, Adjuvanticity, innate immunity
Received: 15 Sep 2025; Accepted: 31 Oct 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Ackaert, Gonzalez-Nolasco, Rosenbaum, Perez-Olivares, Gutknecht, Ducret and Karle. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: 
Chloé  Ackaert, chloe.ackaert@iqvia.com
Anette  Christine Karle, anette.karle@novartis.com
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
