- 1Diabetes Research Institute, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, United States
- 2Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, and Metabolism, Department of Medicine, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, United States
Aging and autoimmunity intersect through the progressive decline of resilience pathways that maintain physiological stability. Resilience refers to the integrated capacity of molecular, cellular, and systemic mechanisms to repair damage, adapt to stress, and preserve immune tolerance. With advancing age, resilience deteriorates due to chronic inflammation, cellular senescence, epigenetic drift, and metabolic dysfunction. While a wide spectrum of autoimmune diseases exists, this perspective focuses primarily on those that emerge or progress with advancing age, in which a decline in immune resilience rather than congenital immune defects plays the predominant role. These changes weaken adaptive capacity and promote conditions that allow autoreactive lymphocytes to persist, initiating autoimmune pathology. This perspective frames autoimmunity as a sentinel manifestation of resilience collapse rather than an isolated failure of immune tolerance. The objective of this article is to delineate the shared molecular and systemic mechanisms by which age-associated loss of resilience promotes autoimmune susceptibility, and to highlight how this framework can guide both research priorities and therapeutic innovation. By examining convergent pathways across inflammation, senescence, epigenetics, and metabolism, we emphasize that autoimmune disease arises from integrated failures in the networks that sustain homeostasis. Recognizing these connections enables the development of integrated biomarkers to detect resilience decline and identify individuals at risk before clinical onset. It further supports therapeutic strategies aimed at enhancing repair capacity, maintaining immune tolerance, and restoring adaptive responses. Recasting autoimmunity in this framework provides opportunities for preventive interventions and novel treatments with the potential to extend healthspan.
1 Introduction
Biological resilience in the context of aging refers to the dynamic ability of an organism to sustain physiological stability, restore equilibrium after perturbation, and adapt to a wide variety of environmental and internal stressors throughout life (1–5). This concept extends beyond the mere absence of disease and captures the integrated function of molecular, cellular, and systemic mechanisms that preserve healthspan and support longevity (6–10). Resilience encompasses processes such as efficient DNA repair, maintenance of proteostasis, control of oxidative stress, balanced inflammatory signaling, preservation of metabolic flexibility, and the fine regulation of immune responses (11–14). Together, these mechanisms act as adaptive buffers that prevent transient challenges from progressing into irreversible tissue damage or chronic pathological states. With advancing age, a progressive decline in these resilience pathways reduces the capacity to repair molecular insults, compromises immune tolerance, and heightens susceptibility to chronic inflammatory and degenerative conditions (15–19). This chronic, low-grade inflammatory state has been termed inflammaging, reflecting the persistent activation of innate immune pathways and dysregulated cytokine networks that characterize the aging process and contribute to multiple age-related pathologies (20–24).
Autoimmunity provides a striking example of the consequences of resilience dysfunction. The immune system is inherently designed to discriminate between self and non-self, relying on multiple tolerance mechanisms to prevent autoreactive lymphocytes from initiating pathogenic responses (25). Central tolerance, established during lymphocyte development, and peripheral tolerance, maintained through regulatory T cells, anergy, and immune checkpoints, together ensure that immune surveillance does not turn against host tissues (26). When these tolerance mechanisms falter, autoreactive T and B cells escape regulation, leading to the chronic inflammation and tissue destruction characteristic of autoimmune diseases (27–29). Importantly, these failures rarely occur in isolation. They are frequently precipitated or exacerbated by broader age-associated deficits in resilience pathways, including persistent low-grade inflammation, accumulation of senescent immune and stromal cells, mitochondrial dysfunction, and progressive instability of the epigenetic landscape (30–34).
Although autoimmunity is often described as increasing with chronological age, population-level analyses reveal a bimodal distribution across the lifespan (35). Diseases such as type 1 diabetes, multiple sclerosis, inflammatory bowel disease, and lupus predominate during youth and early adulthood, whereas conditions including rheumatoid arthritis, Sjögren’s syndrome, vasculitis, and autoimmune thyroid disease become more prevalent in later decades. This bimodality indicates that distinct resilience mechanisms may govern immune tolerance at different life stages, with early life developmental resilience differing from late life cumulative resilience erosion. Accordingly, defining the temporal windows of resilience decline is essential to contextualize when and how aging-related processes contribute to autoimmune susceptibility.
In this perspective, “autoimmunity” refers specifically to immune-mediated diseases in which the loss of self-tolerance arises gradually through cumulative molecular and systemic stress, rather than from congenital or monogenic defects of immune regulation. Classic examples include rheumatoid arthritis, multiple sclerosis, systemic lupus erythematosus, and autoimmune thyroiditis, which often exhibit age-associated onset or exacerbation. This definition deliberately distinguishes resilience-linked autoimmunity from early-onset conditions such as type 1 diabetes in childhood, in which inborn defects in thymic selection or immune checkpoint function play dominant causal roles (36). Our goal is therefore to focus on the subset of autoimmune phenomena that emerge from age-related erosion of adaptive capacity and homeostatic resilience.
The central theme of this perspective is that the biology of aging and the pathogenesis of autoimmunity are not separate domains but instead represent interconnected manifestations of resilience decline (Figure 1). At the molecular level, dysregulated inflammatory cascades that contribute to the phenomenon of inflammaging also drive the loss of self-tolerance (37, 38). At the cellular level, senescent cells secrete pro-inflammatory mediators and expose neo-antigens that perpetuate autoimmune activity (39). At the epigenetic level, drift in DNA methylation patterns, histone modifications, and non-coding RNA networks destabilizes transcriptional programs that normally enforce immune quiescence (40, 41). At the systemic level, the dysfunction of resilience undermines the ability of multiple organ systems to compensate for immune dysregulation, thereby facilitating the onset of clinically overt autoimmune disease.
Figure 1. Aging-associated decline in resilience promotes autoimmune susceptibility.Advancing age leads to progressive impairment of resilience pathways that sustain physiological stability and immune tolerance. Chronic inflammatory cascades establish a persistent low-grade inflammatory milieu that exhausts regulatory networks and facilitates autoreactive lymphocyte persistence. Accumulation of senescent immune and stromal cells generates a secretory phenotype enriched in pro-inflammatory mediators and neoantigen exposure, further amplifying immune activation. Epigenetic drift in DNA methylation, histone modifications, and non-coding RNA expression destabilizes transcriptional programs required for quiescence and tolerance. At the systemic level, declining resilience diminishes the capacity of organ systems to buffer immune dysregulation, thereby enabling the transition from transient autoreactivity to overt autoimmune disease. Created in BioRender. Mittal, R. (2026) https://BioRender.com/hdef6ty.
To strengthen the conceptual framework presented here, we propose a more operational definition of immune resilience. Immune resilience refers to the ability of the immune system to recover its functional stability after perturbation, and it can be quantified through a set of multidimensional biological measurements (42, 43). Indicators of repair capacity, including γH2AX resolution kinetics, maintenance of proteostatic integrity, mitochondrial performance, NAD+ availability, and respiration profiles, provide insight into how effectively cells restore homeostasis after molecular injury (44, 45). The overall organization of the immune compartment, reflected in the proportions of effector, regulatory, and senescent populations, further indicates whether immunological balance is preserved (23, 46). Parameters such as the frequency of regulatory T cells, the accumulation of senescence-associated T and B cells, and the magnitude of the senescence-associated secretory phenotype are particularly informative in this regard (47). Functional assays that monitor recovery after stimulation, including the return of cytokine trajectories to baseline concentrations and the restoration of transcriptional equilibrium following ex vivo challenge, offer an additional dimension for assessing the system’s ability to reset after stress (48). Integrated biomarker profiles that include circulating inflammatory mediators such as IL-6 and C-reactive protein, epigenetic age acceleration indices, T- and B-cell repertoire diversity, and metabolic or proteomic signatures associated with adaptive capacity provide a systems-level perspective on resilience (49). Together, these measurable features create a coherent framework for evaluating immune resilience over time, enabling comparison across individuals and age groups and allowing these metrics to be linked with the initiation or progression of autoimmune disease. Incorporating such operational measurements renders the concept of resilience both biologically well-defined and clinically actionable, supporting its use in risk stratification, early disease detection, and therapeutic monitoring.
In the context of resilience-directed therapeutic strategies, the term restoring adaptive responses refers to two biologically distinct processes. The first concerns improving the functional competence of the existing adaptive immune-cell pool, including enhanced effector function, regulatory capacity, metabolic adaptability, and the ability to return to immunological equilibrium following stimulation. The second concerns reestablishing the ability of the immune system to generate a diverse repertoire of new lymphocytes through mechanisms such as thymic activity, maintenance of naïve T and B cell populations, and preservation of receptor diversity. Distinguishing these processes is important, because aging alters functional responsiveness and generative capacity through partially independent pathways, and interventions designed to enhance resilience may differentially affect them.
Reframing autoimmunity as a manifestation of resilience collapse opens a novel conceptual framework for understanding the biology of immune aging. Rather than viewing autoimmune diseases solely as disorders of aberrant immune activation, they can be interpreted as sentinel conditions that reveal broader vulnerabilities in the resilience architecture of the aging organism. This perspective has profound implications for both mechanistic research and therapeutic innovation. By investigating the cross-talk between resilience pathways and autoimmune susceptibility, it may be possible to identify biomarkers that predict loss of tolerance before disease onset, to design interventions that restore resilience rather than only suppressing inflammation, and ultimately to develop strategies that extend healthspan by preserving the adaptive capacity of the immune system.
2 Shared molecular and cellular pathways
The intersection between aging-associated resilience pathways and the onset of autoimmunity can be most effectively comprehended by examining the molecular and cellular processes that underpin both phenomena. Four key domains, inflammation, cellular senescence, epigenetic regulation, and metabolic function, recurrently emerge as central determinants of whether biological systems maintain homeostasis with age or succumb to autoimmune dysregulation (Table 1).
2.1 Inflammation and inflammaging
One of the most extensively characterized hallmarks of aging is the gradual establishment of a chronic, low-grade inflammatory state often referred to as inflammaging (50). Unlike the acute, tightly regulated inflammatory responses that are essential for pathogen clearance and tissue repair, inflammaging is characterized by persistent elevations of pro-inflammatory mediators such as interleukin-6, tumor necrosis factor-alpha, and C-reactive protein (51, 52). This chronic inflammatory environment undermines resilience by exhausting immune regulatory networks, disrupting tissue repair capacity, and amplifying oxidative stress. In the context of autoimmunity, the same inflammatory mediators that impair resilience also serve as potent drivers of autoreactivity. The NLRP3 inflammasome, for example, represents a critical node at which resilience and autoimmunity converge (53). The NLRP3 (NOD-, LRR-, and pyrin domain-containing protein 3) inflammasome is a multiprotein sensor complex expressed predominantly in myeloid-lineage cells such as monocytes, macrophages, and dendritic cells, with lower but functionally relevant expression also found in endothelial, epithelial, and certain lymphoid cells (54–57). As a cytosolic pattern-recognition receptor, NLRP3 detects diverse pathogen- and damage-associated molecular patterns, including extracellular ATP, crystalline particulates, and mitochondrial stress signals (58, 59). Upon activation, NLRP3 nucleates the inflammasome complex with ASC and caspase-1, leading to the maturation and secretion of interleukin-1β and interleukin-18 and, in some contexts, to pyroptotic cell death (60–62). Through these mechanisms, NLRP3 functions as a central hub linking innate immune sensing, sterile inflammation, and tissue homeostasis (50, 51, 63–65). Persistent or dysregulated activation of this inflammasome with age results in excessive interleukin-1β and interleukin-18 production, accelerating tissue degeneration and promoting differentiation of autoreactive T-helper subsets (66–68). Thus, NLRP3 exemplifies the point at which resilience pathways and autoimmune activation converge within the broader landscape of inflammaging.
While activation of NLRP3 is necessary for host defense and tissue recovery, persistent activation with age results in excessive production of interleukin-1β and interleukin-18, which not only accelerate tissue degeneration but also promote differentiation of autoreactive T helper cell subsets (63, 69). Thus, inflammaging exemplifies a double-edged process in which the very molecules designed to sustain resilience under stress become catalysts for autoimmune activation when regulation fails.
2.2 Cellular senescence
Another prominent feature of aging is the accumulation of senescent cells within both immune and stromal compartments (70–73). Senescence serves as an initially protective mechanism that prevents uncontrolled proliferation of damaged or stressed cells (74). However, when senescent cells persist, they adopt a senescence-associated secretory phenotype characterized by the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines, chemokines, growth factors, and matrix-degrading enzymes (75). For example, senescent fibroblasts in synovial tissue of patients with rheumatoid arthritis secrete interleukin-6 (IL-6), interleukin-8 (IL-8), and matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs), sustaining inflammation, recruiting immune cells, and contributing to joint destruction (34, 76) This secretory profile undermines resilience by impairing tissue architecture, promoting chronic inflammation, and disrupting regenerative niches. At the same time, the senescence-associated secretory phenotype facilitates autoimmune pathology by increasing the presentation of neo-antigens, enhancing autoreactive lymphocyte recruitment, and diminishing the clearance of self-reactive clones (76). Moreover, the age-associated decline in immune surveillance impairs the removal of senescent cells, further amplifying this cycle (77). The resulting environment simultaneously weakens the organism’s capacity for adaptation and repair while priming the immune system for self-directed attack.
To fully understand how senescence influences resilience and autoimmune activation, it is essential to consider not only stromal cell senescence but also the senescence of immune populations (78, 79). Immune cells exhibit characteristic age-associated alterations that parallel those seen in stromal tissues, including impaired proliferative capacity, reduced receptor repertoire diversity, disrupted metabolic adaptability, and increased secretion of pro-inflammatory mediators (78, 80, 81). These senescent immune populations frequently develop a secretory profile analogous SASP, thereby reinforcing chronic inflammatory signaling and weakening the regulatory mechanisms that normally sustain immune tolerance (82, 83). In addition, senescent T cells, B cells, natural killer cells, and myeloid subsets demonstrate diminished ability to re-establish functional homeostasis following antigenic or inflammatory stimulation, which reflects a measurable decline in immune-system resilience (81, 84). This reduced capacity for recovery permits autoreactive lymphocytes that would ordinarily be suppressed or eliminated to persist within the immune repertoire (85). Incorporating immunosenescence into the conceptual framework of resilience therefore emphasizes that age-related functional decline occurs concurrently across both stromal and immune compartments, and that the interaction of these processes plays a central role in determining susceptibility to autoimmune activation.
2.3 Epigenetic regulation
Epigenetic integrity is a cornerstone of biological resilience, ensuring that transcriptional programs remain stable in the face of environmental and metabolic stressors (86, 87). With aging, however, there is progressive epigenetic dysregulation in DNA methylation, histone modifications, and non-coding RNA networks (88–93). These changes destabilize resilience by eroding transcriptional fidelity, compromising lineage identity, and reducing the adaptability of immune and stromal cells (94–96). The same epigenetic dysregulation also precipitates autoimmunity (33, 97). For example, hypomethylation at promoters of pro-inflammatory genes results in their aberrant expression in autoreactive T cells (98–100). MicroRNAs such as miR-21 are frequently upregulated in aging and autoimmune contexts, where they suppress DNA methyltransferase activity, leading to global DNA hypomethylation and derepression of inflammatory genes (101–103). Conversely, protective non-coding RNAs such as the long non-coding RNA GAS5 are often depleted, which removes critical checkpoints on T cell activation and immune tolerance (104–106). These examples highlight how loss of epigenetic resilience not only destabilizes transcriptional regulation but directly enables autoimmune phenotypes (107–109).
2.4 Metabolic pathways
Metabolic homeostasis is increasingly recognized as a fundamental determinant of resilience in aging (110). Efficient energy production, redox balance, and nutrient sensing allow cells to withstand stress and recover from injury (111, 112). With age, mitochondrial dysfunction, accumulation of oxidative damage, and depletion of nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide undermine these processes, thereby weakening resilience (113–115). Impaired autophagy further exacerbates this decline by allowing the buildup of damaged proteins and organelles that perpetuate cellular stress (116–119). In immune cells, these metabolic defects have direct consequences for autoimmunity (120, 121). Mitochondrial dysfunction skews T cell differentiation toward pro-inflammatory phenotypes, while reduced nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide availability impairs the activity of sirtuins that normally suppress inflammatory transcriptional programs (122). At the same time, defective autophagy allows persistence of damaged self-antigens that can serve as triggers for autoreactive immune responses (123, 124). For example, in type 1 diabetes, impaired autophagy in pancreatic β cells leads to accumulation of damaged mitochondria and misfolded proteins that enhance β-cell immunogenicity, promoting T cell–mediated autoimmune destruction of islets (125, 126). Collectively, these metabolic failures diminish the ability of the organism to adapt to stress while simultaneously sustaining the survival and expansion of autoreactive lymphocytes.
Taken together, these overlapping pathways illustrate that the molecular mechanisms governing resilience in aging and those driving autoimmune susceptibility are not independent but rather deeply interconnected. Inflammation, senescence, epigenetic drift, and metabolic dysfunction each undermine the capacity to maintain equilibrium, and in doing so, they open the door to autoreactive immune responses. Recognizing this convergence provides a critical framework for rethinking both the biology of aging and the origins of autoimmune disease.
2.5 B cell function and autoantibody production
B cells play a central role in the pathogenesis of many autoimmune diseases through the production of autoantibodies, antigen presentation, and cytokine secretion (127–130). The generation of autoreactive B cell clones reflects both defective central tolerance in the bone marrow and impaired peripheral checkpoints that normally eliminate or silence self-reactive cells (131, 132). With advancing age, several resilience-associated processes such as altered germinal center dynamics, reduced regulatory B cell function, and chronic inflammatory signaling can disrupt B cell homeostasis and favor autoantibody production (133–135). However, while B cell dysregulation is a hallmark of autoimmune pathology, its contribution to resilience decline may be largely secondary to upstream failures in immune regulation, metabolic balance, and inflammatory control that create permissive conditions for autoreactive clones to persist. Consequently, in this perspective, B cell involvement is acknowledged as a downstream manifestation of resilience erosion rather than a primary driver of its decline. If certain autoimmune conditions are predominantly mediated by autoantibodies, such as lupus or myasthenia gravis, these may represent disease subsets in which resilience collapse amplifies rather than initiates humoral autoreactivity.
2.6 T cell biology and immune resilience
T cells constitute the central regulatory axis of adaptive immunity and are critical determinants of immune tolerance and resilience. Thymic selection, peripheral regulatory circuitry, and the metabolic and epigenetic programs that sustain T cell homeostasis collectively establish the capacity of the system to prevent autoreactivity (136). Aging perturbs each of these domains. Progressive thymic involution contracts the naïve T cell pool and reduces TCR repertoire diversity, limiting the organism’s ability to replace dysfunctional or autoreactive clones (137). Concurrently, age-associated epigenetic drift destabilizes transcriptional networks that maintain quiescence and lineage fidelity, predisposing CD4+ and CD8+ T cells to aberrant activation (138). Mitochondrial dysfunction and impaired redox balance further bias differentiation toward pro-inflammatory Th1 and Th17 phenotypes while compromising the stability and suppressive capacity of regulatory T cells (139–141). In parallel, the accumulation of senescent and terminally differentiated T cell subsets, marked by reduced proliferative potential and a pro-inflammatory secretory profile, diminishes the ability of system to resolve immune perturbations and restore equilibrium after stress (47).
Collectively, these alterations represent a progressive erosion of T cell–intrinsic resilience mechanisms that ordinarily buffer against transient antigenic or inflammatory insults. Their decline increases the persistence, survival, and effector potential of autoreactive T cells, thereby lowering the threshold for autoimmune activation. Integrating these processes into our framework reinforces the central thesis that late-onset autoimmunity reflects not an isolated failure of tolerance but the cumulative breakdown of resilience pathways that regulate T cell generation, maintenance, and functional recalibration across the lifespan.
3 Systems-level interactions
The resilience framework may accommodate the possibility that distinct phases of resilience erosion contribute to autoimmunity. For example, resilience mechanisms tied to thymic education, metabolic plasticity, and epigenetic programming may decline as early as the second decade of life, favoring early-onset diseases such as type 1 diabetes, whereas cumulative inflammatory and senescent burden emerging after midlife may underlie later-onset disorders like rheumatoid arthritis and Sjögren’s syndrome. While molecular and cellular mechanisms provide the foundation for understanding how resilience pathways influence the onset of autoimmunity, it is at the systems level that the cumulative impact of these processes becomes clinically apparent. The organism can be viewed as a network of interconnected subsystems in which resilience operates as a buffer, delaying or preventing the transition from physiological adaptation to pathological breakdown. When these buffering capacities are compromised, the tipping point into autoimmunity is reached more readily, and localized perturbations may escalate into systemic disease.
3.1 Resilience as a buffer against autoimmunity
Biological resilience serves as an integrative defense mechanism that protects the organism from the consequences of immune dysregulation (142–144). In youth and early adulthood, robust resilience pathways compensate for molecular insults, limit the consequences of inflammatory bursts, and rapidly restore immune tolerance after perturbations (145, 146). For example, transient autoreactive responses that arise after infection are typically neutralized by the coordinated actions of regulatory T cells, tolerogenic dendritic cells, and efficient DNA repair and epigenetic stability (147–150). With aging, however, these buffering systems decline (146, 151). The reduced capacity to resolve inflammation, the accumulation of senescent immune and stromal cells, and the diminished ability to reset epigenetic programs after stress all weaken this protective barrier (145, 152, 153). As a result, autoreactive immune cells that would normally be suppressed or eliminated may persist, gradually eroding immune tolerance and predisposing the individual to autoimmune pathology (109, 154–156).
3.2 Cross-talk loops between pathways
The decline of resilience does not occur in isolated domains but rather through a web of reinforcing feedback loops that accelerate the transition from adaptation to pathology (157–159). Chronic low-grade inflammation, characteristic of inflammaging, is a prime example (20, 160–162). Persistent inflammatory signaling not only erodes resilience by damaging tissues and exhausting regulatory immune pathways, but it also drives epigenetic drift (163–165). Aberrant DNA methylation and histone modifications induced by inflammatory cytokines destabilize transcriptional programs that normally maintain immune quiescence (166–168). This in turn promotes clonal expansion of autoreactive T and B cells, which perpetuate further inflammation, thereby completing a vicious cycle (169–171). Metabolic dysfunction integrates into this loop by reducing mitochondrial fitness and impairing autophagy, thereby increasing the load of damaged self-antigens that amplify autoreactive responses (125, 126, 172). Each of these processes feeds forward into the others, creating a system in which resilience pathways are progressively dismantled and the probability of autoimmune onset is markedly increased (33, 169, 173).
3.3 Organ and tissue specificity
Recent evidence highlights that resilience erosion and autoimmune activation manifest through tissue-specific vulnerabilities rather than uniform systemic decline. For example, in the pancreas, impaired β-cell autophagy and limited regenerative capacity heighten susceptibility to T-cell–mediated destruction, as seen in type 1 diabetes (174, 175). Certain organs appear more vulnerable because their intrinsic resilience reserves are relatively limited or because they are disproportionately affected by age-associated stressors (176). The pancreas is a prime example, as the autoimmune destruction of insulin-producing beta cells in type 1 diabetes highlights the inability of this tissue to regenerate once tolerance mechanisms are breached. In the central nervous system, age-related microglial senescence and mitochondrial dysfunction reduce metabolic flexibility and promote chronic neuroinflammation, contributing to autoimmune demyelination in diseases such as multiple sclerosis (177). Joints and connective tissues illustrate another paradigm, where persistent biomechanical stress synergizes with senescent fibroblast accumulation and inflammatory signaling to sustain rheumatoid arthritis pathology (178, 179). Multi-organ aging studies reveal that the rate and pattern of resilience loss differ across tissues, with metabolic and immune organs showing the earliest and most pronounced signatures of decline.
At the systems level, these localized changes are interconnected through inflammatory, metabolic, and epigenetic feedback loops that propagate stress signals across organ systems (180–184). Declining mitochondrial function in immune cells, for instance, amplifies systemic cytokine production, which in turn accelerates senescence and impairs repair mechanisms in distal tissues (180, 185, 186). This bidirectional communication transforms resilience loss in one tissue into a whole-organism vulnerability, establishing a self-reinforcing cycle that culminates in widespread immune dysregulation and autoimmune pathology.
4 Future directions and hypotheses
The recognition that resilience pathways and autoimmune susceptibility are deeply interconnected opens a wide range of opportunities for future research and clinical translation. Several promising directions can be identified with potential to transform both mechanistic understanding and therapeutic approaches to immune-mediated disease in aging.
4.1 Biomarkers of cross-talk between resilience and autoimmunity
A pressing need is the development of reliable biomarkers that capture the shared biological space between resilience decline and autoimmune onset (Supplementary Table 1). Current tools such as epigenetic clocks (187–189), which measure age-associated DNA methylation drift, provide insights into biological age but rarely incorporate immune-specific information. Future efforts should focus on composite biomarker signatures that integrate multiple dimensions of resilience biology. Such signatures may include non-coding RNA profiles that regulate both epigenetic stability and immune tolerance, quantitative measures of senescence-associated secretory factors that reflect the accumulation of dysfunctional cells, and longitudinal tracking of inflammatory mediators that signal erosion of adaptive capacity. A multidimensional biomarker framework would not only allow prediction of autoimmune risk but could also serve as a metric for evaluating the effectiveness of resilience-enhancing interventions. These integrated biomarkers may help identify individuals at high risk earlier and enable more personalized therapeutic strategies.
4.2 Therapeutic reframing through resilience enhancement
Current therapies for autoimmune diseases have historically relied on broad immunosuppressive agents that attenuate global immune activation. In recent years, however, targeted approaches including biologic and small-molecule disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) have transformed clinical management by selectively blocking key cytokines, receptors, or intracellular signaling pathways (for example, anti–TNF, IL-6R, and JAK inhibitors) (190–194). While these advances limit the off-target effects of traditional immunosuppression, they remain primarily directed at dampening immune activation rather than restoring the underlying resilience pathways that sustain tolerance and repair. A future therapeutic paradigm should therefore aim to complement these targeted agents with interventions that enhance resilience itself (Supplementary Table 2). Potential strategies include the use of senolytic drugs to selectively eliminate senescent cells and reduce their pro-inflammatory secretory output. Examples of senolytic agents include the BCL-2 family inhibitor navitoclax (ABT-263), the combination of dasatinib plus quercetin that targets senescent endothelial and adipocyte progenitor cells, and the flavonoid fisetin, which promotes apoptosis of senescent immune and stromal cells (195–203). Additional classes under investigation include HSP90 inhibitors (such as ganetespib) and FOXO4–p53 interaction disruptors (such as FOXO4-DRI peptides), both of which restore tissue repair capacity and reduce the senescence-associated secretory phenotype in preclinical models (204–206).
Supplementation or pharmacological activation of nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide can further restore metabolic and mitochondrial function, while epigenetic modulators stabilize DNA methylation and histone landscapes in autoreactive immune cells. Nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD+) is a central coenzyme in redox reactions and a key regulator of cellular metabolism, mitochondrial function, and DNA repair (44, 207, 208). Age related declines in NAD+ levels contribute to impaired sirtuin activity, mitochondrial dysfunction, and increased inflammatory signaling, which are hallmarks of resilience erosion (209–212). NAD targeted therapies aim to replenish intracellular NAD+ pools or enhance their biosynthetic pathways, thereby restoring metabolic resilience (213–215). Strategies under investigation include supplementation with NAD+ precursors such as nicotinamide riboside (NR) and nicotinamide mononucleotide (NMN), inhibition of NAD+ consuming enzymes such as CD38, and activation of sirtuins that rely on NAD+ as a substrate (216). Preclinical studies demonstrate that these interventions can reduce inflammaging, improve mitochondrial biogenesis, and reestablish immune tolerance, highlighting their potential as resilience enhancing approaches in age associated autoimmunity (212, 217–221).
Emerging RNA-based therapies that target microRNAs or long non-coding RNAs may also provide unprecedented precision in re-establishing tolerance while sparing global immune suppression. For example, anti-miR-21 and anti–miR-155 oligonucleotides have demonstrated immunoregulatory effects in preclinical autoimmune models by dampening pathogenic Th17 and B-cell activation, while GAS5-mimetic lncRNA constructs are being developed to restore regulatory T-cell homeostasis and immune tolerance (105, 222–224). By directly supporting resilience pathways, these interventions may help delay autoimmune onset, reduce disease severity, and potentially extend healthspan.
4.3 Translational opportunities and advanced research methodologies
To translate these concepts into clinical impact, new approaches to human research are required. Longitudinal cohort studies that track individuals from early adulthood through late life, with systematic measurement of resilience markers alongside autoimmune activity, will be essential to map causal trajectories. Single-cell multiomics, integrating transcriptomic, epigenomic, proteomic, and metabolic data at the level of individual immune cells (225–228), will provide unprecedented resolution of the cross-talk between resilience pathways and autoreactive potential. Spatial multiomics could further reveal how resilience erosion interacts with local tissue environments, clarifying why certain organs such as the pancreas, central nervous system, and joints exhibit particular vulnerability. These approaches will also facilitate the identification of therapeutic targets and the refinement of personalized interventions.
4.4 Broader hypothesis: autoimmunity as a sentinel of resilience collapse
Autoimmunity can emerge through heterogeneous mechanisms across the human lifespan. However, the conceptual framework advanced here focuses primarily on late-onset forms that are mechanistically linked to the progressive erosion of biological resilience. These conditions are interpreted as emergent phenomena arising from cumulative failures across molecular, cellular, and systemic adaptive networks rather than from discrete congenital or developmental defects in immune regulation. Delineating this scope refines the mechanistic precision of our model and situates autoimmunity within the broader continuum of age-associated physiological decline. Within this defined context, autoimmune disease may be viewed as an early sentinel of resilience collapse, reflecting the heightened sensitivity of the immune system to perturbations in homeostatic control. As resilience pathways that normally sustain repair, tolerance, and adaptive recalibration deteriorate, immune dysregulation manifests as one of the earliest measurable indicators of systemic instability. In this view, autoimmunity represents not merely a discrete breakdown of immune tolerance but a systems-level indicator of diminishing resilience capacity. As the immune system is uniquely positioned at the intersection of molecular surveillance, cellular adaptation, and systemic integration, autoimmune activation functions as an early barometer of resilience failure. Molecular surveillance refers to the continuous monitoring of molecular integrity within cells and tissues, including the detection and repair of DNA damage, removal of misfolded or oxidized proteins, sensing of metabolic stress, and recognition of pathogen- or damage-associated molecular patterns by innate immune receptors. Aberrant self-recognition thus represents less a discrete immunological accident than a measurable tipping point in the broader capacity of the organism to withstand stress, repair injury, and recalibrate after perturbation.
This reframing has profound implications. First, it positions autoimmunity as a leading indicator of healthspan erosion, much like arrhythmias can signal cardiac instability before heart failure. Second, it highlights the value of autoimmune phenotypes as a research window into resilience dynamics, providing a natural model through which to dissect the interplay of stress response, repair capacity, and adaptive limits. Finally, it redirects therapeutic goals: rather than merely quelling inflammatory damage, interventions should be evaluated for their capacity to rebuild resilience architecture. This entails restoring feedback control, reinforcing tolerance checkpoints, and re-establishing systemic adaptability.
In this perspective, autoimmunity is not only a clinical challenge but also a conceptual gateway to reimagining preventive medicine. Interpreting autoimmune manifestations as early-system sentinel events could enable earlier recognition of resilience decline, support more targeted therapeutic intervention, and ultimately improve functional longevity.
4.5 Limitations and scope
Although framing autoimmunity as a sentinel of resilience collapse is conceptually integrative, it may oversimplify the diverse etiologies and age distributions of autoimmune diseases. Environmental exposures, hormonal influences, and genetic predispositions contribute substantially and may intersect with, but not be wholly explained by, resilience biology. Future research should therefore delineate disease- and age-specific resilience signatures to avoid overgeneralization of this model.
5 Conclusions
The evidence synthesized in this perspective highlights that the processes driving biological aging and those underlying autoimmune pathogenesis are not independent trajectories but rather intersecting outcomes of a progressive dysfunction of resilience. Biological resilience encompasses the coordinated capacity of molecular, cellular, and systemic mechanisms to preserve homeostasis in the face of stress and perturbation. When these mechanisms remain intact, transient insults can be repaired, tolerance is reinforced, and immune activation is effectively constrained. However, with advancing age, the cumulative deterioration of DNA repair, proteostasis, metabolic flexibility, and epigenetic fidelity undermines the organism’s ability to reset equilibrium after disruption. The immune system, being one of the most dynamically regulated and stress-sensitive networks, is particularly vulnerable to this decline. It is within this vulnerable context that autoimmunity emerges as a clinical manifestation of resilience collapse. While this framework provides a unifying view of aging and autoimmunity, it is important to recognize that the underlying mechanisms are heterogeneous. Not all autoimmune diseases are primarily age-driven; several arise during developmental or reproductive phases when distinct resilience mechanisms are at play. Thus, our model applies most directly to autoimmune conditions that correlate with mid-to-late-life resilience decline, rather than those with peak incidence in youth.
At the molecular level, chronic low-grade inflammation, cellular senescence, mitochondrial dysfunction, and epigenetic drift each contribute to the dismantling of tolerance mechanisms. These processes are not isolated but interconnected through feedback loops that amplify damage and compromise adaptive potential. Persistent inflammatory signaling accelerates epigenetic instability; senescent cell accumulation sustains pro-inflammatory and antigenic environments; metabolic deficits impair energy-dependent repair pathways; and disrupted non-coding RNA networks deregulate transcriptional control of immune quiescence. The convergence of these mechanisms creates a biological landscape in which autoreactive lymphocytes not only arise more frequently but also persist and expand, ultimately breaching tolerance barriers that were once resilient.
At the systems level, the decline of resilience transforms the organism from one capable of containing self-reactivity into one in which autoreactive responses propagate unchecked. The buffering capacity that in youth suppresses or extinguishes transient autoreactivity diminishes with age, permitting localized immune perturbations to escalate into chronic and systemic pathology. Organ-specific vulnerabilities further reveal how resilience collapse and autoimmunity interact. The pancreas, central nervous system, and joints illustrate tissues where intrinsic regenerative limits, metabolic demands, or mechanical stress intersect with systemic resilience erosion, resulting in disproportionate susceptibility to autoimmune disease. These observations reinforce the concept that autoimmunity is not an isolated immunological accident but the outcome of systemic destabilization across multiple physiological domains. Together, these findings highlight the importance of understanding resilience as a unifying principle in age-associated autoimmunity.
From a translational perspective, reconceptualizing autoimmunity as a sentinel of resilience decline opens new avenues for prevention and therapy. Biomarkers that integrate signals from inflammation, senescence, epigenetic drift, and metabolic stress hold promise for identifying individuals at heightened risk before overt disease onset. Such multidimensional biomarker frameworks could transform clinical practice by enabling early detection of resilience erosion and stratification of populations for preventive interventions. Therapeutically, the focus must extend beyond suppressing immune activation to fortifying the resilience pathways that sustain tolerance and repair. Senolytic therapies, metabolic enhancers such as nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide repletion, modulators of non-coding RNA networks, and interventions aimed at restoring epigenetic stability exemplify strategies that could address the underlying causes of vulnerability rather than its downstream manifestations. Importantly, such approaches may be most effective if deployed proactively, prior to irreversible tissue damage, when resilience reserves remain partially intact.
Overall, this framework suggests that autoimmunity should be viewed not only as a disorder of immune self-recognition but also as an indicator of broader systemic challenges in maintaining adaptive equilibrium. This perspective compels a shift in both scientific inquiry and clinical strategy. For research, it necessitates integrative approaches such as longitudinal multiomic profiling and systems biology modeling to unravel the causal dynamics linking resilience decline with autoimmune susceptibility. For clinical translation, it demands a reorientation from reactive disease management toward proactive resilience preservation as a means of promoting healthy longevity.
By situating autoimmunity within the broader context of resilience collapse, the boundaries between aging biology and immune pathology are redefined. This unifying approach highlights the need for interdisciplinary research that bridges geroscience, immunology, and translational medicine. Ultimately, advancing our capacity to measure, preserve, and restore resilience has the potential not only to mitigate autoimmune disease but also to extend the period of life spent in health, thereby addressing one of the central challenges of modern biomedical science. This integrative understanding may support more effective strategies to improve both immune function and overall healthspan.
Data availability statement
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author/s.
Author contributions
RM: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. DS: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Validation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. MM: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Validation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. KH: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing.
Funding
The author(s) declared that financial support was not received for this work and/or its publication.
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to Dr. Valerie Gramling for critical reading of the manuscript.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Generative AI statement
The author(s) declare that no Generative AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.
Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Supplementary material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fimmu.2025.1712575/full#supplementary-material
References
1. Manning J, Heselton HJ, Venema DM, Boron JB, and Yentes JM. Defining the concept of physical resilience and quantifying recovery during standing balance in middle-aged and older adults. Sci Rep. (2025) 15:7988. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-92746-7
2. Bandeen-Roche K, Zhu J, Xue QL, Buta B, Laskow T, Walston JD, et al. Characterization of dynamic adaptation to stressors using multisystem stimulus-response data: the study of physical resilience in aging pilot. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. (2025) 80. doi: 10.1093/gerona/glaf056
3. Xue QL, Laskow T, Alzahrani MK, Varadhan R, Walston JD, Schrack JA, et al. Multivariate profiling of physical resilience in older adults after total knee replacement surgery: results from a prospective observational study. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. (2025) 80. doi: 10.1093/gerona/glaf032
4. Seldeen KL, Saha S, Tang Z, Van Sciver A, Treadway CL, Treanor OP, et al. Provocative testing in community dwelling older adults: a path to identify physical resilience. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. (2025). doi: 10.1093/gerona/glaf186
5. Sieber F, Alzahrani MK, Xue QL, Varadhan R, Laskow T, Brown C, et al. A taxonomy to characterize stressor variation in studies of physical resilience and its illustration in total knee replacement. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. (2025) 80. doi: 10.1093/gerona/glaf151
6. Oh HS, Le Guen Y, Rappoport N, Urey DY, Farinas A, Rutledge J, et al. Plasma proteomics links brain and immune system aging with healthspan and longevity. Nat Med. (2025) 31:2703–11. doi: 10.1038/s41591-025-03798-1
7. Kuo CL, Liu P, Drouard G, Vuoksimaa E, Kaprio J, Ollikainen M, et al. A proteomic signature of healthspan. Proc Natl Acad Sci U.S.A. (2025) 122:e2414086122. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2414086122
8. Goeminne LJE, Vladimirova A, Eames A, Tyshkovskiy A, Argentieri MA, Ying K, et al. Plasma protein-based organ-specific aging and mortality models unveil diseases as accelerated aging of organismal systems. Cell Metab. (2025) 37:205–222.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2024.10.005
9. Liu WS, You J, Chen SD, Zhang Y, Feng JF, Xu YM, et al. Plasma proteomics identify biomarkers and undulating changes of brain aging. Nat Aging. (2025) 5:99–112. doi: 10.1038/s43587-024-00753-6
10. Kou M, Ma H, Wang X, Heianza Y, and Qi L. Plasma proteomics-based brain aging signature and incident dementia risk. Geroscience. (2025) 47:2335–49. doi: 10.1007/s11357-024-01407-6
11. Jhanji M, Bhan A, Arrowood C, Yakout DW, Shroff A, McManus D, et al. Tyrosine and phenylalanine activate neuronal DNA repair but exhibit opposing effects on global transcription and adult female mice are resilient to tyrRS/YARS1 depletion. IUBMB Life. (2025) 77:e70030. doi: 10.1002/iub.70030
12. Tan EP, Lyang N, Doroodian S, Sanz-Martinez P, Xu J, Zaretski S, et al. Autophagy activator AA-20 improves proteostasis and extends Caenorhabditis elegans lifespan. Proc Natl Acad Sci U.S.A. (2025) 122:e2423455122. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2423455122
13. Garthwaite T, Sjöros T, Laine S, Koivumäki M, Vähä-Ypyä H, Norha J, et al. Successfully reducing sitting time can improve metabolic flexibility. Scand J Med Sci Sports. (2025) 35:e70113. doi: 10.1111/sms.70113
14. Li D, Zhu J, Zhang M, Shi Q, Guo R, Zhang D, et al. SOSTDC1 downregulation in CD4(+) T cells confers protection against obesity-induced insulin resistance. Cell Rep. (2025) 44:115496. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2025.115496
15. Ding Y, Zuo Y, Zhang B, Fan Y, Xu G, Cheng Z, et al. Comprehensive human proteome profiles across a 50-year lifespan reveal aging trajectories and signatures. Cell. (2025). doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2025.06.047
16. Rall-Scharpf M, Schlotter D, Koch P, Szafranski K, Groth M, Sahm A, et al. Replication stress responses in human lymphocytes change sex-specifically during aging. Nucleic Acids Res. (2025) 53. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkaf498
17. Franck M, Tanner KT, Tennyson RL, Daunizeau C, Ferrucci L, Bandinelli S, et al. Nonuniversality of inflammaging across human populations. Nat Aging. (2025) 5:1471–80. doi: 10.1038/s43587-025-00888-0
18. Arosio B, Rossi PD, Ferri E, Consorti E, Ciccone S, Lucchi TA, et al. The inflammatory profiling in a cohort of older patients suffering from cognitive decline and dementia. Exp Gerontol. (2025) 201:112692. doi: 10.1016/j.exger.2025.112692
19. Lim CM and Vendruscolo M. Proteostasis signatures in human diseases. PloS Comput Biol. (2025) 21:e1013155. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1013155
20. Franceschi C, Garagnani P, Vitale G, Capri M, and Salvioli S. Inflammaging and 'Garb-aging'. Trends Endocrinol Metab. (2017) 28:199–212. doi: 10.1016/j.tem.2016.09.005
21. Ferrucci L and Fabbri E. Inflammageing: chronic inflammation in ageing, cardiovascular disease, and frailty. Nat Rev Cardiol. (2018) 15:505–22. doi: 10.1038/s41569-018-0064-2
22. Fulop T, Larbi A, Dupuis G, Le Page A, Frost EH, Cohen AA, et al. Immunosenescence and inflamm-aging as two sides of the same coin: friends or foes? Front Immunol. (2017) 8:1960. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2017.01960
23. Nguyen TQT and Cho KA. Targeting immunosenescence and inflammaging: advancing longevity research. Exp Mol Med. (2025) 57:1881–92. doi: 10.1038/s12276-025-01527-9
24. Andonian BJ, Hippensteel JA, Abuabara K, Boyle EM, Colbert JF, Devinney MJ, et al. Inflammation and aging-related disease: A transdisciplinary inflammaging framework. Geroscience. (2025) 47:515–42. doi: 10.1007/s11357-024-01364-0
25. Imabayashi K, Yada Y, Kawata K, Yoshimura M, Iwasaki T, Baba A, et al. Critical roles of chronic BCR signaling in the differentiation of anergic B cells into age-associated B cells in aging and autoimmunity. Sci Adv. (2025) 11:eadt8199. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.adt8199
26. Nielsen HV, Yang L, Mueller JL, Ritter AJ, Hiwa R, Proekt I, et al. Nr4a1 and Nr4a3 redundantly control clonal deletion and contribute to an anergy-like transcriptome in auto-reactive thymocytes to impose tolerance in mice. Nat Commun. (2025) 16:784. doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-55839-5
27. Takashima K, Isobe K, Wakabayashi H, Kaneko K, Saiki A, Matuzawa Y, et al. Efficacy and immune-related adverse events of immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with non-small cell lung cancer and autoimmune diseases. Cureus. (2025) 17:e85067. doi: 10.7759/cureus.85067
28. Power JR, Dolladille C, Ozbay B, Procureur A, Ederhy S, Palaskas NL, et al. Immune checkpoint inhibitor-associated myocarditis: a novel risk score. Eur Heart J. (2025). doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaf315
29. Liman N, Li C, Luckey MA, Keller HR, Li J, Hajjar W, et al. Integrin CD103 reveals a distinct developmental pathway of autoreactive thymocytes in TCR transgenic mice. Nat Commun. (2025) 16:6627. doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-61922-8
30. Shumanska M, Lodygin D, Gibhardt CS, Ickes C, Stejerean-Todoran I, Krause LCM, et al. Mitochondrial calcium uniporter complex controls T-cell-mediated immune responses. EMBO Rep. (2025) 26:407–42. doi: 10.1038/s44319-024-00313-4
31. Ai M, Zhou X, Carrer M, Jafar-Nejad P, Li Y, Gades N, et al. Targeting mechanistic target of rapamycin complex 2 attenuates immunopathology in systemic lupus erythematosus. Rheumatol (Oxford). (2025) 64:3964–74. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keae662
32. Biswas S, Kasperek EM, Zhu C, Miecznikowski JC, Osinski J, Romano RA, et al. Tlr9 expression protects against Tlr7-dependent exocrine gland and systemic disease manifestations in primary Sjögren's disease in a sex-biased manner. J Autoimmun. (2025) 156:103467. doi: 10.1016/j.jaut.2025.103467
33. Ou Y, Wang Z, Yuan Y, He Y, Li W, Ren H, et al. Epigenetic age acceleration and rheumatoid arthritis: an NHANES-based analysis and survival prediction models. Clin Epigenet. (2025) 17:111. doi: 10.1186/s13148-025-01919-8
34. Chen J, Xu D, Chen B, Jian S, Chen T, Wang W, et al. Senescent macrophages trigger a pro-inflammatory program and promote the progression of rheumatoid arthritis. Int Immunopharmacol. (2025) 149:114164. doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2025.114164
35. Conrad N, Misra S, Verbakel JY, Verbeke G, Molenberghs G, Taylor PN, et al. Incidence, prevalence, and co-occurrence of autoimmune disorders over time and by age, sex, and socioeconomic status: a population-based cohort study of 22 million individuals in the UK. Lancet. (2023) 401:1878–90. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(23)00457-9
36. Rosenblum MD, Remedios KA, and Abbas AK. Mechanisms of human autoimmunity. J Clin Invest. (2015) 125:2228–33. doi: 10.1172/JCI78088
37. Dema M, Eixarch H, Hervera A, Castillo M, Villar LM, Montalban X, et al. Disease aggravation with age in an experimental model of multiple sclerosis: role of immunosenescence. Aging Cell. (2025) 24:e14491. doi: 10.1111/acel.14491
38. Xiao S, Kang SW, Oliva KE, Zhang W, Klonowski KD, Manley NR, et al. Premature thymic involution in young Foxn1lacz mutant mice causes peripheral T cell phenotypes similar to aging-induced immunosenescence. J Immunol. (2025). doi: 10.1101/2024.04.23.590170
39. Keltsch E, Greiner J, Wahl L, Knape I, Tews D, Denkinger M, et al. Aging modulates the immunosuppressive, polarizing and metabolic functions of blood-derived myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs). Immun Ageing. (2025) 22:29. doi: 10.1186/s12979-025-00524-w
40. Chen Y, Liu J, Ren B, Zhou Z, He Y, Li F, et al. Validation of DNA methylation and transcriptional characteristics in CCL5 and CXCL8 genes in autoimmune thyroiditis with varying iodine levels. Sci Rep. (2025) 15:6006. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-90499-x
41. Vanderlinden LA, Wong E, Johnson RK, Carry P, Dong F, Kechris K, et al. DNA methylation smoking scores and risk of islet autoimmunity and type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care. (2025) 48:1628–36. doi: 10.2337/dc25-0330
42. Montano M. Immune resilience: rewriting the rules of healthy aging. Aging Cell. (2025) 24:e70089. doi: 10.1111/acel.70089
43. Manoharan MS, Lee GC, Harper N, Meunier JA, Restrepo MI, Jimenez F, et al. The 15-year survival advantage: immune resilience as a salutogenic force in healthy aging. Aging Cell. (2025) 24:e70063. doi: 10.1111/acel.70063
44. Yusri K, Jose S, Vermeulen KS, Tan TCM, and Sorrentino V. The role of NAD(+) metabolism and its modulation of mitochondria in aging and disease. NPJ Metab Health Dis. (2025) 3:26. doi: 10.1038/s44324-025-00067-0
45. Zhao X, Lv P, Cai Z, Dong J, Chen W, Sun L, et al. Unveiling the role of NAD glycohydrolase CD38 in aging and age-related diseases: insights from bibliometric analysis and comprehensive review. Front Immunol. (2025) 16:1579924. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1579924
46. Karras A, Lioulios G, Kantartzi K, Fylaktou A, Panagoutsos S, Stangou M, et al. Measuring the senescence-associated secretory phenotype. Biomedicines. (2025) 13. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines13092062
47. Yin F, He Y, Li J, and Gao Y. Immune cell senescence in autoimmunity: implications for disease pathogenesis and therapeutic targeting. Front Immunol. (2025) 16:1596686. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1596686
48. Terekhova M, Bohacova P, and Artyomov MN. Human immune aging. Immunity. (2025) 58:2646–69. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2025.10.009
49. Furrer R and Handschin C. Biomarkers of aging: from molecules and surrogates to physiology and function. Physiol Rev. (2025) 105:1609–94. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00045.2024
50. Sebastian-Valverde M and Pasinetti GM. The NLRP3 inflammasome as a critical actor in the inflammaging process. Cells. (2020) 9. doi: 10.3390/cells9061552
51. Gritsenko A, Green JP, Brough D, and Lopez-Castejon G. Mechanisms of NLRP3 priming in inflammaging and age related diseases. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. (2020) 55:15–25. doi: 10.1016/j.cytogfr.2020.08.003
52. Talley S, Nguyen T, Van Ye L, Valiauga R, DeCarlo J, Mustafa J, et al. Characterization of age-associated inflammasome activation reveals tissue specific differences in transcriptional and post-translational inflammatory responses. Immun Ageing. (2024) 21:60. doi: 10.1186/s12979-024-00462-z
53. Cai L, Zhang K, Gao J, Xiao B, Li M, Meng X, et al. ACPA-Induced ATP release and K(+) efflux trigger NLRP3 inflammasome activation in rheumatoid arthritis. Cell Commun Signal. (2025) 23:302. doi: 10.1186/s12964-025-02331-8
54. Kelley N, Jeltema D, Duan Y, and He Y. The NLRP3 inflammasome: an overview of mechanisms of activation and regulation. Int J Mol Sci. (2019) 20. doi: 10.3390/ijms20133328
55. Kodi T, Sankhe R, Gopinathan A, Nandakumar K, and Kishore A. New insights on NLRP3 inflammasome: mechanisms of activation, inhibition, and epigenetic regulation. J Neuroimmune Pharmacol. (2024) 19:7. doi: 10.1007/s11481-024-10101-5
56. Ratajczak MZ, Bujko K, Cymer M, Thapa A, Adamiak M, Ratajczak J, et al. The Nlrp3 inflammasome as a "rising star" in studies of normal and Malignant hematopoiesis. Leukemia. (2020) 34:1512–23. doi: 10.1038/s41375-020-0827-8
57. Honda TSB, Ku J, and Anders HJ. Cell type-specific roles of NLRP3, inflammasome-dependent and -independent, in host defense, sterile necroinflammation, tissue repair, and fibrosis. Front Immunol. (2023) 14:1214289. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1214289
58. Kim SK. The mechanism of the NLRP3 inflammasome activation and pathogenic implication in the pathogenesis of gout. J Rheum Dis. (2022) 29:140–53. doi: 10.4078/jrd.2022.29.3.140
59. Rada B, Park JJ, Sil P, Geiszt M, and Leto TL. NLRP3 inflammasome activation and interleukin-1β release in macrophages require calcium but are independent of calcium-activated NADPH oxidases. Inflammation Res. (2014) 63:821–30. doi: 10.1007/s00011-014-0756-y
60. Brydges SD, Broderick L, McGeough MD, Pena CA, Mueller JL, Hoffman HM, et al. Divergence of IL-1, IL-18, and cell death in NLRP3 inflammasomopathies. J Clin Invest. (2013) 123:4695–705. doi: 10.1172/JCI71543
61. Chen Y, Ye X, Escames G, Lei W, Zhang X, Li M, et al. The NLRP3 inflammasome: contributions to inflammation-related diseases. Cell Mol Biol Lett. (2023) 28:51. doi: 10.1186/s11658-023-00462-9
62. Filardy AA, He J, Bennink J, Yewdell J, and Kelsall BL. Posttranscriptional control of NLRP3 inflammasome activation in colonic macrophages. Mucosal Immunol. (2016) 9:850–8. doi: 10.1038/mi.2015.109
63. Khilazheva ED, Mosiagina AI, Panina YA, Belozor OS, and Komleva YK. Impact of NLRP3 depletion on aging-related metaflammation, cognitive function, and social behavior in mice. Int J Mol Sci. (2023) 24. doi: 10.3390/ijms242316580
64. McKee CM and Coll RC. NLRP3 inflammasome priming: A riddle wrapped in a mystery inside an enigma. J Leukoc Biol. (2020) 108:937–52. doi: 10.1002/JLB.3MR0720-513R
65. Latz E and Duewell P. NLRP3 inflammasome activation in inflammaging. Semin Immunol. (2018) 40:61–73. doi: 10.1016/j.smim.2018.09.001
66. Lara PC, Macías-Verde D, and Burgos-Burgos J. Age-induced NLRP3 inflammasome over-activation increases lethality of SARS-coV-2 pneumonia in elderly patients. Aging Dis. (2020) 11:756–62. doi: 10.14336/AD.2020.0601
67. Kahlenberg JM and Kang I. Advances in disease mechanisms and translational technologies: clinicopathologic significance of inflammasome activation in autoimmune diseases. Arthritis Rheumatol. (2020) 72:386–95. doi: 10.1002/art.41127
68. Mittal R, Saavedra D, Mittal M, Lemos JRN, and Hirani K. Inflammasome activation and accelerated immune aging in autoimmune disorders. Front Aging. (2025) 6:1688060. doi: 10.3389/fragi.2025.1688060
69. Tylutka A, Walas Ł, and Zembron-Lacny A. Level of IL-6, TNF, and IL-1β and age-related diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Immunol. (2024) 15:1330386. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1330386
70. Moiseeva V, Cisneros A, Sica V, Deryagin O, Lai Y, Jung S, et al. Senescence atlas reveals an aged-like inflamed niche that blunts muscle regeneration. Nature. (2023) 613:169–78. doi: 10.1038/s41586-022-05535-x
71. Thapa R, Marianesan AB, Rekha A, Ganesan S, Kumari M, Bhat AA, et al. Hypoxia-inducible factor and cellular senescence in pulmonary aging and disease. Biogerontology. (2025) 26:64. doi: 10.1007/s10522-025-10208-z
72. Thau H, Gerjol BP, Hahn K, von Gudenberg RW, Knoedler L, Stallcup K, et al. Senescence as a molecular target in skin aging and disease. Ageing Res Rev. (2025) 105:102686. doi: 10.1016/j.arr.2025.102686
73. Xiong J, Guo Q, and Luo X. Cellular senescence in age-related musculoskeletal diseases. Front Med. (2025) 19:409–26. doi: 10.1007/s11684-025-1125-7
74. Nakanishi M. Cellular senescence as a source of chronic microinflammation that promotes the aging process. Proc Jpn Acad Ser B Phys Biol Sci. (2025) 101:224–37. doi: 10.2183/pjab.101.014
75. Han J, Cherry C, Mejías JC, Krishnan K, Ruta A, Maestas DR, et al. Age-associated senescent - T cell signaling promotes type 3 immunity that inhibits the biomaterial regenerative response. Adv Mater. (2024) 36:e2310476. doi: 10.1002/adma.202310476
76. Fukushima Y, Minato N, and Hattori M. The impact of senescence-associated T cells on immunosenescence and age-related disorders. Inflammation Regener. (2018) 38:24. doi: 10.1186/s41232-018-0082-9
77. Fukushima Y, Ueno R, Minato N, and Hattori M. Senescence-associated T cells in immunosenescence and diseases. Int Immunol. (2025) 37:143–52. doi: 10.1093/intimm/dxae056
78. Desdín-Micó G, Soto-Heredero G, Aranda JF, Oller J, Carrasco E, Gabandé-Rodríguez E, et al. T cells with dysfunctional mitochondria induce multimorbidity and premature senescence. Science. (2020) 368:1371–6. doi: 10.1126/science.aax0860
79. Ricker E, Manni M, Flores-Castro D, Jenkins D, Gupta S, Rivera-Correa J, et al. Altered function and differentiation of age-associated B cells contribute to the female bias in lupus mice. Nat Commun. (2021) 12:4813. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-25102-8
80. Duchowny KA, Zhang YS, Stebbins RC, Ma X, Chin JJY, Chang VW, et al. The aging immune system and all-cause mortality in older americans: differences across sex and race/ethnicity. Immun Ageing. (2025) 22:25. doi: 10.1186/s12979-025-00521-z
81. Litjens NHR, van der List ACJ, Klepper M, Reijerkerk D, Prevoo F, Betjes MGH, et al. Older age is associated with a distinct and marked reduction of functionality of both alloreactive CD4+ and CD8+ T cells. Front Immunol. (2024) 15:1406716. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1406716
82. Ayoub M, Abou Jaoude C, Ayoub M, Hamade A, and Rima M. The immune system and cellular senescence: A complex interplay in aging and disease. Immunology. (2025). doi: 10.1111/imm.70036
83. Türk L, Filippov I, Arnold C, Zaugg J, Tserel L, Kisand K, et al. Cytotoxic CD8(+) Temra cells show loss of chromatin accessibility at genes associated with T cell activation. Front Immunol. (2024) 15:1285798. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1285798
84. Lambert EE, van Twillert I, Beckers L, Poelen MCM, Han WGH, Pieren DKJ, et al. Reduced Bordetella pertussis-specific CD4(+) T-Cell Responses at Older Age. Front Aging. (2021) 2:737870. doi: 10.3389/fragi.2021.737870
85. Quach TD, Huang W, Sahu R, Diadhiou CM, Raparia C, Johnson R, et al. Context-dependent induction of autoimmunity by TNF signaling deficiency. JCI Insight. (2022) 7. doi: 10.1172/jci.insight.149094
86. Vihervaara A, Mahat DB, Himanen SV, Blom MAH, Lis JT, Sistonen L, et al. Stress-induced transcriptional memory accelerates promoter-proximal pause release and decelerates termination over mitotic divisions. Mol Cell. (2021) 81:1715–1731.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2021.03.007
87. Pratx L, Wendering P, Kappel C, Nikoloski Z, and Bäurle I. Histone retention preserves epigenetic marks during heat stress-induced transcriptional memory in plants. EMBO J. (2023) 42:e113595. doi: 10.15252/embj.2023113595
88. Jain N, Li JL, Tong L, Jasmine F, Kibriya MG, Demanelis K, et al. DNA methylation correlates of chronological age in diverse human tissue types. Epigenet Chromatin. (2024) 17:25. doi: 10.1186/s13072-024-00546-6
89. Welsh H, Batalha C, Li W, Souza-Pinto NC, Duarte YAO, Naslavsky MS, et al. Age-related changes in DNA methylation in a sample of elderly Brazilians. Clin Epigenet. (2025) 17:17. doi: 10.1186/s13148-025-01821-3
90. Richardson M, Brandt C, Jain N, Li JL, Demanelis K, Jasmine F, et al. Characterization of DNA methylation clock algorithms applied to diverse tissue types. Aging (Albany NY). (2025) 17:67–96. doi: 10.18632/aging.206182
91. Hillje R, Luzi L, Amatori S, Persico G, Casciaro F, Rusin M, et al. Time makes histone H3 modifications drift in mouse liver. Aging (Albany NY). (2022) 14:4959–75. doi: 10.18632/aging.204107
92. Sen P, Donahue G, Li C, Egervari G, Yang N, Lan Y, et al. Spurious intragenic transcription is a feature of mammalian cellular senescence and tissue aging. Nat Aging. (2023) 3:402–17. doi: 10.1038/s43587-023-00384-3
93. Wagner V, Kern F, Hahn O, Schaum N, Ludwig N, Fehlmann T, et al. Characterizing expression changes in noncoding RNAs during aging and heterochronic parabiosis across mouse tissues. Nat Biotechnol. (2024) 42:109–18. doi: 10.1038/s41587-023-01751-6
94. Su TY, Hauenstein J, Somuncular E, Dumral Ö, Leonard E, Gustafsson C, et al. Aging is associated with functional and molecular changes in distinct hematopoietic stem cell subsets. Nat Commun. (2024) 15:7966. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-52318-1
95. McCauley BS, Sun L, Yu R, Lee M, Liu H, Leeman DS, et al. Altered chromatin states drive cryptic transcription in aging mammalian stem cells. Nat Aging. (2021) 1:684–97. doi: 10.1038/s43587-021-00091-x
96. Yang N, Occean JR, Melters DP, Shi C, Wang L, Stransky S, et al. A hyper-quiescent chromatin state formed during aging is reversed by regeneration. Mol Cell. (2023) 83:1659–1676.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2023.04.005
97. Liu H, Zhang H, Yin Z, and Hou M. Assessment of relationships between epigenetic age acceleration and multiple sclerosis: a bidirectional mendelian randomization study. Epigenet Chromatin. (2025) 18:7. doi: 10.1186/s13072-025-00567-9
98. Vordenbäumen S, Rosenbaum A, Gebhard C, Raithel J, Sokolowski A, Düsing C, et al. Associations of site-specific CD4(+)-T-cell hypomethylation within CD40-ligand promotor and enhancer regions with disease activity of women with systemic lupus erythematosus. Lupus. (2021) 30:45–51. doi: 10.1177/0961203320965690
99. Somers EC, Goodrich JM, Wang L, Harlow SD, Marder W, Hassett AL, et al. Associations between CD70 methylation of T cell DNA and age in adults with systemic lupus erythematosus and population controls: The Michigan Lupus Epidemiology & Surveillance (MILES) Program. J Autoimmun. (2024) 142:103137. doi: 10.1016/j.jaut.2023.103137
100. Wu H, Deng Y, Long D, Yang M, Li Q, Feng Y, et al. The IL-21-TET2-AIM2-c-MAF pathway drives the T follicular helper cell response in lupus-like disease. Clin Transl Med. (2022) 12:e781. doi: 10.1002/ctm2.781
101. Mensà E, Guescini M, Giuliani A, Bacalini MG, Ramini D, Corleone G, et al. Small extracellular vesicles deliver miR-21 and miR-217 as pro-senescence effectors to endothelial cells. J Extracell Vesicles. (2020) 9:1725285. doi: 10.1080/20013078.2020.1725285
102. Fedeli M, Kuka M, Finardi A, Albano F, Viganò V, Iannacone M, et al. miR-21 sustains CD28 signalling and low-affinity T-cell responses at the expense of self-tolerance. Clin Transl Immunol. (2021) 10:e1321. doi: 10.1002/cti2.1321
103. Ibrahim MRK, Waly NG, Moness H, Ahmed SS, and Ibrahem R. Serum miRNA-21, miRNA-146a and plasma cell free DNA as novel biomarkers for assessing systemic lupus erythematosus activity. Mol Biol Rep. (2023) 50:10025–36. doi: 10.1007/s11033-023-08845-z
104. Liu Q, Deng Y, Li C, Xie H, Liu Q, Ming S, et al. LncRNA GAS5 suppresses CD4(+) T cell activation by upregulating E4BP4 via inhibiting miR-92a-3p in systemic lupus erythematosus. Immunol Lett. (2020) 227:41–7. doi: 10.1016/j.imlet.2020.08.001
105. Xu Y and Ouyang Y. Long non-coding RNA growth arrest specific 5 regulates the T helper 17/regulatory T balance by targeting miR-23a in myasthenia gravis. J Int Med Res. (2022) 50:3000605211053703. doi: 10.1177/03000605211053703
106. Nguyen LNT, Nguyen LN, Zhao J, Schank M, Dang X, Cao D, et al. Long Non-coding RNA GAS5 Regulates T Cell Functions via miR21-Mediated Signaling in People Living With HIV. Front Immunol. (2021) 12:601298. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.601298
107. Aso K, Kono M, Kanda M, Kudo Y, Sakiyama K, Hisada R, et al. Itaconate ameliorates autoimmunity by modulating T cell imbalance via metabolic and epigenetic reprogramming. Nat Commun. (2023) 14:984. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-36594-x
108. Pahl MC, Sharma P, Thomas RM, Thompson Z, Mount Z, Pippin JA, et al. Dynamic chromatin architecture identifies new autoimmune-associated enhancers for IL2 and novel genes regulating CD4+ T cell activation. Elife. (2024) 13. doi: 10.7554/eLife.96852
109. Page N, Lemeille S, Vincenti I, Klimek B, Mariotte A, Wagner I, et al. Persistence of self-reactive CD8+ T cells in the CNS requires TOX-dependent chromatin remodeling. Nat Commun. (2021) 12:1009. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-21109-3
110. Becker E, Husain M, Bone N, Smith S, Morris P, Zmijewski JW, et al. AMPK activation improves recovery from pneumonia-induced lung injury via reduction of er-stress and apoptosis in alveolar epithelial cells. Respir Res. (2023) 24:185. doi: 10.1186/s12931-023-02483-6
111. Fan W, Chen H, Li M, Fan X, Jiang F, Xu C, et al. NRF2 activation ameliorates blood-brain barrier injury after cerebral ischemic stroke by regulating ferroptosis and inflammation. Sci Rep. (2024) 14:5300. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-53836-0
112. Ahmad I, Molyvdas A, Jian MY, Zhou T, Traylor AM, Cui H, et al. AICAR decreases acute lung injury by phosphorylating AMPK and upregulating heme oxygenase-1. Eur Respir J. (2021) 58. doi: 10.1183/13993003.03694-2020
113. Araujo APB, Vargas G, Hayashide LS, Matias I, Andrade CBV, de Carvalho JJ, et al. Aging promotes an increase in mitochondrial fragmentation in astrocytes. Front Cell Neurosci. (2024) 18:1496163. doi: 10.3389/fncel.2024.1496163
114. Diniz LP, Araujo APB, Carvalho CF, Matias I, de Sá Hayashide L, Marques M, et al. Accumulation of damaged mitochondria in aging astrocytes due to mitophagy dysfunction: Implications for susceptibility to mitochondrial stress. Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Basis Dis. (2024) 1870:167470. doi: 10.1016/j.bbadis.2024.167470
115. Yang F, Deng X, Yu Y, Luo L, Chen X, Zheng J, et al. Association of human whole blood NAD(+) contents with aging. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). (2022) 13:829658. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2022.829658
116. Sebti S, Zou Z, and Shiloh MU. BECN1(F121A) mutation increases autophagic flux in aged mice and improves aging phenotypes in an organ-dependent manner. Autophagy. (2023) 19:957–65. doi: 10.1080/15548627.2022.2111852
117. Fernández ÁF, Sebti S, Wei Y, Zou Z, Shi M, McMillan KL, et al. Disruption of the beclin 1-BCL2 autophagy regulatory complex promotes longevity in mice. Nature. (2018) 558:136–40. doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0162-7
118. Wang C, Haas M, Yeo SK, Sebti S, Fernández ÁF, Zou Z, et al. Enhanced autophagy in Becn1(F121A/F121A) knockin mice counteracts aging-related neural stem cell exhaustion and dysfunction. Autophagy. (2022) 18:409–22. doi: 10.1080/15548627.2021.1936358
119. Carosi JM, Martin A, Hein LK, Hassiotis S, Hattersley KJ, Turner BJ, et al. Autophagy across tissues of aging mice. PloS One. (2025) 20:e0325505. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0325505
120. Niu D, Yue SY, Wang X, Li WY, Zhang L, Du HX, et al. High glucose intake exacerbates experimental autoimmune prostatitis through mitochondrial reactive oxygen species-dependent TGF-β activation-mediated Th17 differentiation. Int Immunopharmacol. (2024) 130:111682. doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2024.111682
121. Wang PF, Jiang F, Zeng QM, Yin WF, Hu YZ, Li Q, et al. Mitochondrial and metabolic dysfunction of peripheral immune cells in multiple sclerosis. J Neuroinflamm. (2024) 21:28. doi: 10.1186/s12974-024-03016-8
122. Shin B, Benavides GA, Geng J, Koralov SB, Hu H, Darley-Usmar VM, et al. Mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation regulates the fate decision between pathogenic th17 and regulatory T cells. Cell Rep. (2020) 30:1898–1909.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2020.01.022
123. Takakura Y, Machida M, Terada N, Katsumi Y, Kawamura S, Horie K, et al. Mitochondrial protein C15ORF48 is a stress-independent inducer of autophagy that regulates oxidative stress and autoimmunity. Nat Commun. (2024) 15:953. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-45206-1
124. Romero V, Darrah E, and Andrade F. Generation of distinct patterns of rheumatoid arthritis autoantigens by peptidylarginine deiminase types 2 and 4 during perforin-induced cell damage. Arthritis Rheumatol. (2020) 72:912–8. doi: 10.1002/art.41196
125. Austin MC, Muralidharan C, Roy S, Crowder JJ, Piganelli JD, Linnemann AK, et al. Dysfunctional β-cell autophagy induces β-cell stress and enhances islet immunogenicity. Front Immunol. (2025) 16:1504583. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1504583
126. Muralidharan C, Conteh AM, Marasco MR, Crowder JJ, Kuipers J, de Boer P, et al. Pancreatic beta cell autophagy is impaired in type 1 diabetes. Diabetologia. (2021) 64:865–77. doi: 10.1007/s00125-021-05387-6
127. Sachinidis A, Xanthopoulos K, and Garyfallos A. Age-associated B cells (ABCs) in the prognosis, diagnosis and therapy of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Mediterr J Rheumatol. (2020) 31:311–8. doi: 10.31138/mjr.31.3.311
128. Mouat IC and Horwitz MS. Age-associated B cells in viral infection. PloS Pathog. (2022) 18:e1010297. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1010297
129. Raza IGA and Clarke AJ. B cell metabolism and autophagy in autoimmunity. Front Immunol. (2021) 12:681105. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.681105
130. Li ZY, Cai ML, Qin Y, and Chen Z. Age/autoimmunity-associated B cells in inflammatory arthritis: An emerging therapeutic target. Front Immunol. (2023) 14:1103307. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1103307
131. Xie G, Chen X, Gao Y, Yang M, Zhou S, Lu L, et al. Age-associated B cells in autoimmune diseases: pathogenesis and clinical implications. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol. (2025) 68:18. doi: 10.1007/s12016-025-09021-w
132. Dai D, Gu S, Han X, Ding H, Jiang Y, Zhang X, et al. The transcription factor ZEB2 drives the formation of age-associated B cells. Science. (2024) 383:413–21. doi: 10.1126/science.adf8531
133. Brenna C and Petrovas C. Germinal center immune dynamics: challenges for effective vaccination in the elderly. Immunotherapy. (2025) 17:811–22. doi: 10.1080/1750743X.2025.2546279
134. Valentino TR, Chen N, Makhijani P, Khan S, Winer S, Revelo XS, et al. The role of autoantibodies in bridging obesity, aging, and immunosenescence. Immun Ageing. (2024) 21:85. doi: 10.1186/s12979-024-00489-2
135. Kim D, Kim J, Yeo H, and Chung Y. Immunometabolic regulation of germinal centers and its implications for aging. Curr Opin Immunol. (2024) 91:102485. doi: 10.1016/j.coi.2024.102485
136. de Boer RJ, Tesselaar K, and Borghans JAM. Better safe than sorry: Naive T-cell dynamics in healthy ageing. Semin Immunol. (2023) 70:101839. doi: 10.1016/j.smim.2023.101839
137. Bohacova P, Terekhova M, Tsurinov P, Mullins R, Husarcikova K, Shchukina I, et al. Multidimensional profiling of human T cells reveals high CD38 expression, marking recent thymic emigrants and age-related naive T cell remodeling. Immunity. (2024) 57:2362–2379.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2024.08.019
138. Rousseau L, Hajdu KL, and Ho PC. Meta-epigenetic shifts in T cell aging and aging-related dysfunction. J BioMed Sci. (2025) 32:51. doi: 10.1186/s12929-025-01146-6
139. Soto-Heredero G, Gabandé-Rodríguez E, Carrasco E, Escrig-Larena JI, Gómez de Las Heras MM, Delgado-Pulido S, et al. KLRG1 identifies regulatory T cells with mitochondrial alterations that accumulate with aging. Nat Aging. (2025) 5:799–815. doi: 10.1038/s43587-025-00855-9
140. Lin L, Ren R, Xiong Q, Zheng C, Yang B, Wang H, et al. Remodeling of T-cell mitochondrial metabolism to treat autoimmune diseases. Autoimmun Rev. (2024) 23:103583. doi: 10.1016/j.autrev.2024.103583
141. Honing DY, Luiten RM, and Matos TR. Regulatory T cell dysfunction in autoimmune diseases. Int J Mol Sci. (2024) 25. doi: 10.3390/ijms25137171
142. Ahuja SK, Manoharan MS, Lee GC, McKinnon LR, Meunier JA, Steri M, et al. Immune resilience despite inflammatory stress promotes longevity and favorable health outcomes including resistance to infection. Nat Commun. (2023) 14:3286. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-38238-6
143. Lee GC, Restrepo MI, Harper N, Manoharan MS, Smith AM, Meunier JA, et al. Immunologic resilience and COVID-19 survival advantage. J Allergy Clin Immunol. (2021) 148:1176–91. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2021.08.021
144. Wrona MV, Ghosh R, Coll K, Chun C, and Yousefzadeh MJ. The 3 I's of immunity and aging: immunosenescence, inflammaging, and immune resilience. Front Aging. (2024) 5:1490302. doi: 10.3389/fragi.2024.1490302
145. Vono M, Huttner A, Lemeille S, Martinez-Murillo P, Meyer B, Baggio S, et al. Robust innate responses to SARS-CoV-2 in children resolve faster than in adults without compromising adaptive immunity. Cell Rep. (2021) 37:109773. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2021.109773
146. Hurst JH, Mohan AA, Dalapati T, George IA, Aquino JN, Lugo DJ, et al. Age-associated differences in mucosal and systemic host responses to SARS-CoV-2 infection. Nat Commun. (2025) 16:2383. doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-57655-3
147. Babcock BR, Kosters A, Eddins DJ, Donaire MSB, Sarvadhavabhatla S, Pae V, et al. Transient anti-interferon autoantibodies in the airways are associated with recovery from COVID-19. Sci Transl Med. (2024) 16:eadq1789. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.adq1789
148. Muri J, Cecchinato V, Cavalli A, Shanbhag AA, Matkovic M, Biggiogero M, et al. Autoantibodies against chemokines post-SARS-CoV-2 infection correlate with disease course. Nat Immunol. (2023) 24:604–11. doi: 10.1038/s41590-023-01445-w
149. Nikolic T, Suwandi JS, Wesselius J, Laban S, Joosten AM, Sonneveld P, et al. Tolerogenic dendritic cells pulsed with islet antigen induce long-term reduction in T-cell autoreactivity in type 1 diabetes patients. Front Immunol. (2022) 13:1054968. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.1054968
150. Blanc RS, Shah N, Hachmer S, Salama NAS, Meng FW, Mousaei A, et al. Epigenetic erosion of H4K20me1 induced by inflammation drives aged stem cell ferroptosis. Nat Aging. (2025) 5:1491–509. doi: 10.1038/s43587-025-00902-5
151. Terekhova M, Swain A, Bohacova P, Aladyeva E, Arthur L, Laha A, et al. Single-cell atlas of healthy human blood unveils age-related loss of NKG2C(+)GZMB(-)CD8(+) memory T cells and accumulation of type 2 memory T cells. Immunity. (2023) 56:2836–2854.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2023.10.013
152. Sanborn MA, Wang X, Gao S, Dai Y, and Rehman J. Unveiling the cell-type-specific landscape of cellular senescence through single-cell transcriptomics using SenePy. Nat Commun. (2025) 16:1884. doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-57047-7
153. Filippov I, Schauser L, and Peterson P. An integrated single-cell atlas of blood immune cells in aging. NPJ Aging. (2024) 10:59. doi: 10.1038/s41514-024-00185-x
154. Saggau C, Bacher P, Esser D, Rasa M, Meise S, Mohr N, et al. Autoantigen-specific CD4(+) T cells acquire an exhausted phenotype and persist in human antigen-specific autoimmune diseases. Immunity. (2024) 57:2416–2432.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2024.08.005
155. Tesch F, Ehm F, Vivirito A, Wende D, Batram M, Loser F, et al. Incident autoimmune diseases in association with SARS-CoV-2 infection: a matched cohort study. Clin Rheumatol. (2023) 42:2905–14. doi: 10.1007/s10067-023-06670-0
156. Hileman CO, Malakooti SK, Patil N, Singer NG, and McComsey GA. New-onset autoimmune disease after COVID-19. Front Immunol. (2024) 15:1337406. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1337406
157. Meier HCS, Mitchell C, Karadimas T, and Faul JD. Systemic inflammation and biological aging in the Health and Retirement Study. Geroscience. (2023) 45:3257–65. doi: 10.1007/s11357-023-00880-9
158. Cribb L, Hodge AM, Yu C, Li SX, English DR, Makalic E, et al. Inflammation and epigenetic aging are largely independent markers of biological aging and mortality. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. (2022) 77:2378–86. doi: 10.1093/gerona/glac147
159. Chen X, Zhong J, Lv Y, Wei L, Zhou H, Yang Y, et al. Epigenetic age acceleration mediates the association between low-grade systemic inflammation and cardiovascular diseases: insight from the NHANES 1999-2002. Clin Epigenet. (2025) 17:89. doi: 10.1186/s13148-025-01895-z
160. Zhu Q, Zhang Q, Chen C, Liu M, He Y, Zhao Y, et al. C-reactive protein, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, and long-term mortality in chinese centenarians. JAMA Netw Open. (2023) 6:e2340307. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.40307
161. Wang Z, Xiong F, Zhang Q, and Wang H. Dynamic changes in hs-CRP and risk of all-cause mortality among middle-aged and elderly adults: findings from a nationwide prospective cohort and mendelian randomization. Aging Clin Exp Res. (2024) 36:210. doi: 10.1007/s40520-024-02865-w
162. Bannaga AS, Tabuso M, Farrugia A, Chandrapalan S, Somal K, Lim VK, et al. C-reactive protein and albumin association with mortality of hospitalised SARS-CoV-2 patients: A tertiary hospital experience. Clin Med (Lond). (2020) 20:463–7. doi: 10.7861/clinmed.2020-0424
163. Wielscher M, Mandaviya PR, Kuehnel B, Joehanes R, Mustafa R, Robinson O, et al. DNA methylation signature of chronic low-grade inflammation and its role in cardio-respiratory diseases. Nat Commun. (2022) 13:2408. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-29792-6
164. Verschoor CP, Vlasschaert C, Rauh MJ, and Paré G. A DNA methylation based measure outperforms circulating CRP as a marker of chronic inflammation and partly reflects the monocytic response to long-term inflammatory exposure: A Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging analysis. Aging Cell. (2023) 22:e13863. doi: 10.1111/acel.13863
165. Lundin JI, Peters U, Hu Y, Ammous F, Benjamin EJ, Bis JC, et al. Epigenetic mechanisms underlying variation of IL-6, a well-established inflammation biomarker and risk factor for cardiovascular disease. Atherosclerosis. (2025) 407:120219. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2025.120219
166. Al-Roub A, Al Madhoun A, Akhter N, Thomas R, Miranda L, Jacob T, et al. IL-1β and TNFα Cooperativity in regulating IL-6 expression in adipocytes depends on CREB binding and H3K14 acetylation. Cells. (2021) 10. doi: 10.3390/cells10113228
167. Bahman F, Al-Roub A, Akhter N, Al Madhoun A, Wilson A, Almansour N, et al. TNF-α/stearate induced H3K9/18 histone acetylation amplifies IL-6 expression in 3T3-L1 mouse adipocytes. Int J Mol Sci. (2024) 25. doi: 10.3390/ijms25126776
168. Crosswhite P and Sun Z. TNFα Induces DNA and histone hypomethylation and pulmonary artery smooth muscle cell proliferation partly via excessive superoxide formation. Antioxidants (Basel). (2024) 13. doi: 10.3390/antiox13060677
169. Sun X, Nguyen T, Achour A, Ko A, Cifello J, Ling C, et al. Longitudinal analysis reveals age-related changes in the T cell receptor repertoire of human T cell subsets. J Clin Invest. (2022) 132. doi: 10.1172/JCI158122
170. Chen Z, Flores Castro D, Gupta S, Phalke S, Manni M, Rivera-Correa J, et al. Interleukin-13 receptor α1-mediated signaling regulates age-associated/autoimmune B cell expansion and lupus pathogenesis. Arthritis Rheumatol. (2022) 74:1544–55. doi: 10.1002/art.42146
171. Burtis AEC, DeNicola DMC, Ferguson ME, Santos RG, Pinilla C, Kriss MS, et al. Ag-driven CD8 + T cell clonal expansion is a prominent feature of MASH in humans and mice. Hepatology. (2025) 81:591–608. doi: 10.1097/HEP.0000000000000971
172. Wragg KM, Worley MJ, Deng JC, Salmon M, and Goldstein DR. Deficiency in the mitophagy mediator Parkin accelerates murine skin allograft rejection. Am J Transplant. (2024) 24:2174–86. doi: 10.1016/j.ajt.2024.08.005
173. Zhang X, Wang Y, Xue H, Zhao Y, Liu M, Wei H, et al. Clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential and risk of autoimmune thyroid disease. BMC Med. (2025) 23:237. doi: 10.1186/s12916-025-04077-z
174. Al-Hasani K, Marikar SN, Kaipananickal H, Maxwell S, Okabe J, Khurana I, et al. EZH2 inhibitors promote β-like cell regeneration in young and adult type 1 diabetes donors. Signal Transduct Target Ther. (2024) 9:2. doi: 10.1038/s41392-023-01707-x
175. Tian YE, Cropley V, Maier AB, Lautenschlager NT, Breakspear M, Zalesky A, et al. Heterogeneous aging across multiple organ systems and prediction of chronic disease and mortality. Nat Med. (2023) 29:1221–31. doi: 10.1038/s41591-023-02296-6
176. Oh HS, Rutledge J, Nachun D, Pálovics R, Abiose O, Moran-Losada P, et al. Organ aging signatures in the plasma proteome track health and disease. Nature. (2023) 624:164–72. doi: 10.1038/s41586-023-06802-1
177. Kent SA and Miron VE. Microglia regulation of central nervous system myelin health and regeneration. Nat Rev Immunol. (2024) 24:49–63. doi: 10.1038/s41577-023-00907-4
178. Weyand CM and Goronzy JJ. Immune aging in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheumatol. (2025) 77:792–804. doi: 10.1002/art.43105
179. van Dijk BT, Boeren AMP, Khidir SJH, den Hollander NK, and van der Helm-van Mil AHM. Work-related physical strain and development of joint inflammation in the trajectory of emerging inflammatory and rheumatoid arthritis: a prospective cohort study. RMD Open. (2024) 10. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2023-003895
180. Wen J, Cheng J, Wang L, Li C, Zou Y, Wu J, et al. Dynamic molecular choreography induced by acute heat exposure in human males: a longitudinal multi-omics profiling study. Front Public Health. (2024) 12:1384544. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1384544
181. Hill RJ, Bona N, Smink J, Webb HK, Crisp A, Garaycoechea JI, et al. p53 regulates diverse tissue-specific outcomes to endogenous DNA damage in mice. Nat Commun. (2024) 15:2518. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-46844-1
182. Stüve P, Godoy GJ, Ferreyra FN, Hellriegel F, Boukhallouk F, Kao YS, et al. ACC1 is a dual metabolic-epigenetic regulator of Treg stability and immune tolerance. Mol Metab. (2025) 94:102111. doi: 10.1016/j.molmet.2025.102111
183. Nayer B, Tan JL, Alshoubaki YK, Lu YZ, Legrand JMD, Lau S, et al. Local administration of regulatory T cells promotes tissue healing. Nat Commun. (2024) 15:7863. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-51353-2
184. Luan J, Truong C, Vuchkovska A, Guo W, Good J, Liu B, et al. CD80 on skin stem cells promotes local expansion of regulatory T cells upon injury to orchestrate repair within an inflammatory environment. Immunity. (2024) 57:1071–1086.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2024.04.003
185. Gygi JP, Maguire C, Patel RK, Shinde P, Konstorum A, Shannon CP, et al. Integrated longitudinal multiomics study identifies immune programs associated with acute COVID-19 severity and mortality. J Clin Invest. (2024) 134. doi: 10.1172/JCI176640
186. Stephenson E, Macdonald-Dunlop E, Dratva LM, Lindeboom RGH, Tuong ZK, Tun WM, et al. Temporal multi-omics analysis of COVID-19 in end-stage kidney disease. Cell Genom. (2025) 5:100918. doi: 10.1016/j.xgen.2025.100918
187. Koch Z, Li A, Evans DS, Cummings S, and Ideker T. Somatic mutation as an explanation for epigenetic aging. Nat Aging. (2025) 5:709–19. doi: 10.1038/s43587-024-00794-x
188. Horvath S. DNA methylation age of human tissues and cell types. Genome Biol. (2013) 14:R115. doi: 10.1186/gb-2013-14-10-r115
189. Field AE, Robertson NA, Wang T, Havas A, Ideker T, Adams PD, et al. DNA methylation clocks in aging: categories, causes, and consequences. Mol Cell. (2018) 71:882–95. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2018.08.008
190. Miyazaki Y, Horiuchi N, Okamoto S, Matsumoto R, Takeuchi T, Tanaka Y, et al. Early effects of ozoralizumab 30 mg in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and inadequate response to methotrexate: a post hoc trajectory analysis of the phase II/III OHZORA trial. RMD Open. (2025) 11. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2025-005710
191. Ward MM, Weinstein A, Alejandro-Silva P, Matsumoto AK, Konatalapalli R, Stahl N, et al. Discontinuation versus continuation of maintenance treatment with tumor necrosis factor inhibitors in patients with rheumatoid arthritis with low disease activity or remission: A randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial. Semin Arthritis Rheum. (2025) 75:152831. doi: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2025.152831
192. Liu T, Wang L, Zhang X, Chen L, Liu Y, Jiang Z, et al. Tocilizumab monotherapy or combined with methotrexate for rheumatoid arthritis: A randomized clinical trial. JAMA Netw Open. (2025) 8:e2511095. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.11095
193. Agueusop I, Margerie D, Remaury A, Brard R, Frau F, Gerard E, et al. Deciphering differential biomarkers for anti-interleukin-6 receptor and anti-tumour necrosis factor-α treatment response in rheumatoid arthritis by multiomics analysis. RMD Open. (2025) 11. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2025-005556
194. Hashimoto T, Tsuboi K, Abe T, Yoshikawa T, Noguchi K, Furukawa T, et al. Nocturnal baricitinib administration leads to rapid drug responses in rheumatoid arthritis: a multicenter non-randomized controlled study. Arthritis Res Ther. (2025) 27:91. doi: 10.1186/s13075-025-03555-2
195. Shvedova M, Thanapaul R, Ha J, Dhillon J, Shin GH, Crouch J, et al. Topical ABT-263 treatment reduces aged skin senescence and improves subsequent wound healing. Aging (Albany NY). (2024) 17:16–32. doi: 10.18632/aging.206165
196. Kim JC, Kim NY, Kim Y, Baek DJ, Park TJ, Kang HY, et al. Senolytic targeting of anti-apoptotic bcl family increases cell death in UV-irradiated senescent melanocytes: search for senolytics. Exp Dermatol. (2025) 34:e70037. doi: 10.1111/exd.70037
197. Gulej R, Nyúl-Tóth Á, Ahire C, DelFavero J, Balasubramanian P, Kiss T, et al. Elimination of senescent cells by treatment with Navitoclax/ABT263 reverses whole brain irradiation-induced blood-brain barrier disruption in the mouse brain. Geroscience. (2023) 45:2983–3002. doi: 10.1007/s11357-023-00870-x
198. Fan T, Du Y, Zhang M, Zhu AR, and Zhang J. Senolytics cocktail dasatinib and quercetin alleviate human umbilical vein endothelial cell senescence via the TRAF6-MAPK-NF-κB axis in a YTHDF2-dependent manner. Gerontology. (2022) 68:920–34. doi: 10.1159/000522656
199. Zoico E, Nori N, Darra E, Tebon M, Rizzatti V, Policastro G, et al. Senolytic effects of quercetin in an in vitro model of pre-adipocytes and adipocytes induced senescence. Sci Rep. (2021) 11:23237. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-02544-0
200. Islam MT, Tuday E, Allen S, Kim J, Trott DW, Holland WL, et al. Senolytic drugs, dasatinib and quercetin, attenuate adipose tissue inflammation, and ameliorate metabolic function in old age. Aging Cell. (2023) 22:e13767. doi: 10.1111/acel.13767
201. Roos CM, Zhang B, Palmer AK, Ogrodnik MB, Pirtskhalava T, Thalji NM, et al. Chronic senolytic treatment alleviates established vasomotor dysfunction in aged or atherosclerotic mice. Aging Cell. (2016) 15:973–7. doi: 10.1111/acel.12458
202. Ijima S, Saito Y, Nagaoka K, Yamamoto S, Sato T, Miura N, et al. Fisetin reduces the senescent tubular epithelial cell burden and also inhibits proliferative fibroblasts in murine lupus nephritis. Front Immunol. (2022) 13:960601. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.960601
203. Hambright WS, Mu X, Gao X, Guo P, Kawakami Y, Mitchell J, et al. The senolytic drug fisetin attenuates bone degeneration in the zmpste24 (-/-) progeria mouse model. J Osteoporos 2023. (2023) p:5572754. doi: 10.1155/2023/5572754
204. Chen DD, Peng X, Wang Y, Jiang M, Xue M, Shang G, et al. HSP90 acts as a senomorphic target in senescent retinal pigmental epithelial cells. Aging (Albany NY). (2021) 13:21547–70. doi: 10.18632/aging.203496
205. Kong YX, Li ZS, Liu YB, Pan B, Fu X, Xiao R, et al. FOXO4-DRI induces keloid senescent fibroblast apoptosis by promoting nuclear exclusion of upregulated p53-serine 15 phosphorylation. Commun Biol. (2025) 8:299. doi: 10.1038/s42003-025-07738-0
206. Bourgeois B, Spreitzer E, Platero-Rochart D, Paar M, Zhou Q, Usluer S, et al. The disordered p53 transactivation domain is the target of FOXO4 and the senolytic compound FOXO4-DRI. Nat Commun. (2025) 16:5672. doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-60844-9
207. Bhasin S, Seals D, Migaud M, Musi N, and Baur JA. Nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide in aging biology: potential applications and many unknowns. Endocr Rev. (2023) 44:1047–73. doi: 10.1210/endrev/bnad019
208. Abdellatif M, Sedej S, and Kroemer G. NAD(+) metabolism in cardiac health, aging, and disease. Circulation. (2021) 144:1795–817. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.121.056589
209. Hope HC, de Sostoa J, Ginefra P, Andreatta M, Chiang YH, Ronet C, et al. Age-associated nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide decline drives CAR-T cell failure. Nat Cancer. (2025) 6:1524–36. doi: 10.1038/s43018-025-00982-7
210. Huo F, Zhao M, Liu Y, Lv S, Feng S, Guo L, et al. Tissue-specific effects of bacterial PncA overexpression on NAD(+) metabolism and aging in mice: implications for tissue-specific aging interventions. Front Aging. (2025) 6:1546017. doi: 10.3389/fragi.2025.1546017
211. Kosugi S, Yamaguchi S, Nishioka K, Nagahisa T, Watanabe Y, Kojima D, et al. Vascular endothelial NAMPT-mediated NAD(+) biosynthesis regulates angiogenesis and cardiometabolic functions in male mice. Aging Cell. (2025) 2025:e70222. doi: 10.1111/acel.70222
212. Song WS, Shen X, Du K, Ramirez CB, Park SH, Cao Y, et al. Nicotinic acid riboside maintains NAD(+) homeostasis and ameliorates aging-associated NAD(+) decline. Cell Metab. (2025) 37:1499–1514.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2025.04.007
213. Yamaguchi S, Irie J, Mitsuishi M, Uchino Y, Nakaya H, Takemura R, et al. Safety and efficacy of long-term nicotinamide mononucleotide supplementation on metabolism, sleep, and nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide biosynthesis in healthy, middle-aged Japanese men. Endocr J. (2024) 71:153–69. doi: 10.1507/endocrj.EJ23-0431
214. Yi L, Maier AB, Tao R, Lin Z, Vaidya A, Pendse S, et al. The efficacy and safety of β-nicotinamide mononucleotide (NMN) supplementation in healthy middle-aged adults: a randomized, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, dose-dependent clinical trial. Geroscience. (2023) 45:29–43. doi: 10.1007/s11357-022-00705-1
215. Morifuji M, Higashi S, Ebihara S, and Nagata M. Ingestion of β-nicotinamide mononucleotide increased blood NAD levels, maintained walking speed, and improved sleep quality in older adults in a double-blind randomized, placebo-controlled study. Geroscience. (2024) 46:4671–88. doi: 10.1007/s11357-024-01204-1
216. Song Q, Zhou X, Xu K, Liu S, Zhu X, Yang J, et al. The safety and antiaging effects of nicotinamide mononucleotide in human clinical trials: an update. Adv Nutr. (2023) 14:1416–35. doi: 10.1016/j.advnut.2023.08.008
217. Wu C, Wu Z, Hu L, Tang L, Hu X, Fang C, et al. SIRT1/PGC-1α/Mfn2 pathway regulates mitochondrial homeostasis in VSMC to attenuate aging-related vascular calcification. Sci Rep. (2025) 15:38045. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-21905-7
218. Guo R, Li Y, Song Q, Huang R, Ge X, Nieto N, et al. Increasing cellular NAD(+) protects hepatocytes against palmitate-induced lipotoxicity by preventing PARP-1 inhibition and the mTORC1-p300 pathway activation. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. (2025) 328:C776–c790. doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.00946.2024
219. Hou Y, Wei Y, Lautrup S, Yang B, Wang Y, Cordonnier S, et al. NAD(+) supplementation reduces neuroinflammation and cell senescence in a transgenic mouse model of Alzheimer's disease via cGAS-STING. Proc Natl Acad Sci U.S.A. (2021) 118. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2011226118
220. Wang JL, Li B, Tan GJ, Gai XL, Xing JN, Wang JQ, et al. NAD+ attenuates experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis through induction of CD11b+ gr-1+ myeloid-derived suppressor cells. Biosci Rep. (2020) 40. doi: 10.1042/BSR20200353
221. Zhu S, Zhang L, Tong P, Chen J, Wang C, Wang Z, et al. Nicotinamide riboside mitigates retinal degeneration by suppressing damaged DNA-stimulated microglial activation and STING-mediated pyroptosis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. (2025) 66:14. doi: 10.1167/iovs.66.4.14
222. Murugaiyan G, da Cunha AP, Ajay AK, Joller N, Garo LP, Kumaradevan S, et al. MicroRNA-21 promotes Th17 differentiation and mediates experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. J Clin Invest. (2015) 125:1069–80. doi: 10.1172/JCI74347
223. Garchow BG, Bartulos Encinas O, Leung YT, Tsao PY, Eisenberg RA, Caricchio R, et al. Silencing of microRNA-21 in vivo ameliorates autoimmune splenomegaly in lupus mice. EMBO Mol Med. (2011) 3:605–15. doi: 10.1002/emmm.201100171
224. Li J, Tian J, Lu J, Wang Z, Ling J, Wu X, et al. LncRNA GAS5 inhibits Th17 differentiation and alleviates immune thrombocytopenia via promoting the ubiquitination of STAT3. Int Immunopharmacol. (2020) 80:106127. doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2019.106127
225. Wang J, Zheng A, Liu N, Tan Z, Shi Y, Ma T, et al. Integrative spatial multiomics analysis reveals regulatory mechanisms of VCAM1(+) proximal tubule cells in lupus nephritis. Ann Rheum Dis. (2025). doi: 10.1016/j.ard.2025.08.015
226. Das A, Saeki K, Dell'Orso S, Wang X, Mansky KC, Stains J, et al. Integrative single-cell RNA-seq and ATAC-seq identifies transcriptional and epigenetic blueprint guiding osteoclastogenic trajectory. J Bone Miner Res. (2025) 40:1127–43. doi: 10.1093/jbmr/zjaf084
227. Yin J, Lv J, Yang S, Wang Y, Huang Z, Wang X, et al. Multi-omics reveals immune response and metabolic profiles during high-altitude mountaineering. Cell Rep. (2025) 44:115134. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2024.115134
Keywords: aging, biological resilience, autoimmunity, inflammaging, senescence, healthspan, longevity
Citation: Mittal R, Saavedra D, Mittal M and Hirani K (2025) Cross-talk between aging resilience pathways and autoimmunity onset. Front. Immunol. 16:1712575. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1712575
Received: 26 September 2025; Accepted: 24 November 2025; Revised: 16 November 2025;
Published: 09 December 2025.
Edited by:
Ravi Misra, University of Rochester Medical Center, United StatesReviewed by:
Joshua Reynolds, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, United StatesPeijie Yu, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong SAR, China
Copyright © 2025 Mittal, Saavedra, Mittal and Hirani. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Rahul Mittal, ci5taXR0YWwxMUBtZWQubWlhbWkuZWR1; Khemraj Hirani, a2hpcmFuaUBtZWQubWlhbWkuZWR1
Mannat Mittal1