Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Immunol.

Sec. Comparative Immunology

The contribution of amphibian macrophage subsets to scarless regeneration of skin wounds

Provisionally accepted
Christina  N. Garvey GriffithChristina N. Garvey Griffith1Kelsey  A. Hauser, PhDKelsey A. Hauser, PhD2Bradley  AbramsonBradley Abramson2Elissa  R. ChapkinElissa R. Chapkin1Elizabeth  J. JonesElizabeth J. Jones3Anju  N. DuttargiAnju N. Duttargi3Leon  GrayferLeon Grayfer1*
  • 1The George Washington University, Washington, United States
  • 2Noblis, Reston, United States
  • 3Georgetown University, Washington, United States

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Xenopus laevis juvenile frogs regenerate wounded skin without scarring, yet the underlying mechanisms driving this process remain poorly defined. Macrophages are critical to wound repair across vertebrates, and our results indicate a transient influx of macrophages into regenerating frog wounds. The colony stimulating factor-1 (CSF1) and interleukin-34 (IL34) growth factors control macrophage development. Through RNA in situ hybridization studies, we found that csf1 gene expression peaked early during juvenile frog wound responses, whereas il34 expression increased later in the repair process. Our past studies indicate that X. laevis CSF1-and IL34-differentiated macrophages are functionally distinct. Presently, we treated frog wounds with recombinant (r) CSF1 and rIL34 to determine the roles of the corresponding macrophage subsets in wound repair. Using a combination of RNA in situ hybridization, RNA sequencing and histology, we demonstrated that wounds skewed towards greater proportions of rCSF1-macrophages exhibited greater infiltration of leukocytes, chiefly amongst them neutrophils. These wounds also possessed robust expression of inflammatory genes and transcripts associated with granulation and fibrosis. By contrast, rIL34-treated frog wounds exhibited greater fibroblast activation concurrent with greater type I/III collagen ratios and expression of genes typically seen at later phases of wound repair. Together, we propose that while CSF1-macrophages are likely more prominently involved in the inflammatory phase of X. laevis wound repair, IL34-macrophages predominate the later reparative phase of these responses.

Keywords: wound repair, Regeneration, macrophage, Interleukin-34, Colony stimulating factor-1

Received: 25 Sep 2025; Accepted: 11 Nov 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Garvey Griffith, Hauser, PhD, Abramson, Chapkin, Jones, Duttargi and Grayfer. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Leon Grayfer, leon_grayfer@gwu.edu

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.