Abstract
Streptococcus suis is a serious threat to swine industry and public health. In this work, a total of 62 S. suis isolates recovered from infected and healthy pigs from four provinces in northern China were classified by multilocus sequence typing into nine sequence types (STs), including six novel ones, namely, ST417, ST418, ST419, ST420, ST421, and ST422. The majority (64.5%) of these 62 isolates belong to serotype 2; all of these serotype 2 isolates can be assigned into ST1 or ST28 clonal complex, indicating at least two parallel routes of clonal dissemination of these isolates. In these serotype 2 isolates, 23 (20 from healthy pigs and three from diseased pigs) were identified as ST7 strains, which were previously characterized as the cause of streptococcal toxic shock-like syndrome. The novel ST strains lack 89 K pathogenicity island but can cause septicemia and meningitis in a mouse model, showing remarkable differences in virulence. The ST421 strain named HLB causes suppurative encephalitis. Our results highlighted the need for increased surveillance of S. suis in farm-raised pigs in northern China.
INTRODUCTION
Streptococcus suis is an important pathogen of pigs and one of the most important causes of bacterial mortality in post-weaning piglets (). At least 33 capsular serotypes (1 to 31, 33, and 1/2) of S. suis have been described; among highly virulent strains, serotype 2 is the most dominant (; ). Meningitis is the most striking feature of S. suis infection in pigs; the presence of fibrin, edema, and cellular infiltrates in meninges and choroid plexus, along with adjacent encephalitis, are commonly observed histopathological characteristics (). Animal models of S. suis-induced meningitis have been widely characterized with serotype 2; however, other serotypes have been rarely used ().
Streptococcus suis can cause meningitis, septicemia, endocarditis, and arthritis in humans in close contact with infected pigs or pork-derived products. In China, S. suis serotype 2 causes two outbreaks of human infection, which is characterized as streptococcal toxic shock-like syndrome (STSS) with higher-than-usual morbidity and mortality (; ; ; ). STSS-causing S. suis has evolved to acquire, most likely through horizontal gene transfer, an 89 K pathogenicity island (89 K PaI) with multiple virulence genes (; ; ). 89 K PaI-negative S. suis can also affect humans and cause fatal infections (). S. suis contains an array of virulence genes, including those that encode outer membrane proteins, extracellular proteases, transporters, and secretion systems and their effectors, which are located inside and outside 89 K PaI ().
Multilocus sequence typing (MLST), a highly discriminatory method used to characterize bacterial population structure (; ; ), has been performed to investigate genotypes and microevolution of S. suis since 2002 (; ). Thus far, 1,415 S. suis strains have been recorded in the S. suis MLST database 1; these strains can be classified into 616 STs in particular including 47 STs (corresponding to 218 isolates) from China.
In northern China, S. suis-associated diseases in farm-raised pigs typically occur from the end of October to the middle of January of the succeeding year; at these times, S. suis strains can be steadily isolated from infected pigs. This study aimed to characterize genetic diversity, microevolution, and virulence of S. suis isolates from the farm-raised pigs in northern China.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
BACTERIAL STRAINS
A total of 62 S. suis strains were isolated from different individuals of healthy or diseased pigs in swine farms in four provinces, namely, Heilongjiang, Jilin, Liaoning, and Hebei, in northern China from March 2007 to the autumn of 2010. S. suis-specific glutamate dehydrogenase (gdh) gene was targeted for PCR to identify this bacterial species (). S. suis capsular types were discriminated by using S. suis antisera specific for individual known serotypes from the Statens Serum Institute (SSI, Denmark); the distinguished types were then confirmed with a co-agglutination test, as previously reported ().
MULTILOCUS SEQUENCE TYPING
Bacteria were grown overnight at 37°C in Todd-Hewitt Broth (THB) and genomic DNA was then isolated using a TIANamp bacterial DNA kit (TIANGEN, China). For MLST (), the DNA fragments of seven housekeeping genes, including aroA, cpn60, dpr, gki, mutS, recA, and thrA, were amplified by PCR. Both DNA strands were sequenced with PCR primers on ABI-3700 sequencer. DNA sequences were aligned using MUSCLE Version 3.8 (). The alleles and the ST number of each isolate were determined by querying the S. suis MLST database 2. Clonal complexes were identified and the overall population structure was determined using the eBURST software (). Two different STs sharing six of the seven loci constituted a single-locus variant (SLV). A double-locus variant (DLV) contained two STs that differed in two loci but share the same other loci. A triple-locus variant (TLV) included two STs that differed in three loci. A clonal complex was composed of at least three STs with only SLVs. Two STs belonging to the same group with SLV were called a doublet. The remaining STs that did not contain SLV with other STs were termed singletons. The founders (ancestry types) of CCs were predicted with 1,000 re-samplings for bootstrap.
DETECTION OF VIRULENCE MARKERS
Virulence markers encoding muramidase-released protein (MRP), extracellular protein factor (EF), suilysin (SLY), and 89 K PaI were detected by PCR, as previously described (; ; ). S. suis strain 05ZYH33, a serotype 2 reference strain isolated from the human STSS case and harboring these virulence markers (), was used as positive control in PCR.
EXPERIMENTAL MOUSE INFECTION
Animal infection experiments were conducted following the guidelines and approved protocols of the Heilongjiang Province Experiment Animal Care and Use Committee. Each group of 16 female mice (6-weeks-old) was infected with one tested strain; bacterial suspension [1 ml; ∼5 × 107 colony forming units (CFU)/ml] or sterile THB was administered intraperitoneally to each mouse (). The mice were monitored daily for 12 days to determine mortality rates and clinical signs. Blood (5 μl) was collected from the tail vein of each infected mouse at different days after infection; blood was then plated onto sheep blood agar plates for bacterial growth overnight at 37°C to evaluate bacterial loads (CFU/ml of blood). Bacterial load (CFU/0.05 g of organ specimens) in the liver or in the brain of each dead mouse at necropsy was also counted; organ specimens were subsequently fixed in 10% buffered formalin for histopathological analysis.
STATISTICAL ANALYSIS
ANOVA was performed using GraphPad Prism (version 5.02 for Windows; GraphPad Software Incorporated, La Jolla, CA, USA).
RESULTS
GENETIC DIVERSITY
Among 62 S. suis isolates (Table 1), 36 were from healthy pigs and 26 were from diseased pigs. Among the 36 isolates from healthy pigs, five were from Hebei, six were from Heilongjiang, and 25 were from Jilin; conversely, the 26 isolates from diseased pigs were distributed among seven counties in Heilongjiang (Table 1). Furthermore, 54 of the 62 isolates could be assigned into serotypes 2 (40 isolates), 7 (nine isolates), and 9 (five isolates); however, the eight remaining isolates could not be typed on the basis of the antisera panel of the 33 known serotypes (Table 1).
Table 1
| Number of strains (n = 62) | Serotype (n = 3) | Multilocus sequence typing (MLST) allelic profile (n = 9) | Sequence types (STs) (n = 9) | Clonal complex | Location (province–city) | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5 | 7 | 8,30,5,34,30,3,25 | ST29 | ST25 | Hebei-SJZ | Healthy pigs, nose swabs, Autumn 2008 |
| 6 | 2 | 2,30,5,34,31,3,25 | ST28 | ST28 | Heilongjiang-ZD | Healthy pigs, nose swabs, Autumn 2010 |
| 5 | 2 | 2,30,5,34,31,3,25 | ST28 | Jilin-DH | Healthy pigs, nose swabs, Spring 2007 | |
| 3 | 2 | 1,30,5,34,31,4,25 | ST418 | Heilongjiang-JMS | Diseased pigs, brains, sporadic, Autumn 2007 | |
| 20 | 2 | 1,1,1,1,1,1,3 | ST7 | ST1 | Jilin-CC | Healthy pigs, nose swabs, Spring 2010 |
| 3 | 2 | 1,1,1,1,1,1,3 | ST7 | Heilongjiang-MDJ | Diseased pigs, synovia, sporadic, Autumn 2007 | |
| 3 | 2 | 1,1,1,1,31,1,3 | ST419 | Heilongjiang-HD | Diseased pigs, brains, sporadic, Winter 2010 | |
| 5 | 9 | 45,56,1,15,57,52,55 | ST417 | Not applicable | Heilongjiang-WC | Diseased pigs, brains, outbreak, Autumn 2007 |
| 4 | Unknown | 1,35,2,7,1,52,28 | ST421 | Heilongjiang-LB | Diseased pigs, brains, sporadic, Winter 2010 | |
| 4 | Unknown | 7,58,36,54,42,37,12 | ST422 | Heilongjiang-HL | Diseased pigs, brains, sporadic, Winter 2010 | |
| 4 | 7 | 7,58,36,54,42,34,12 | ST420 | Heilongjiang-JB | Diseased pigs, brains, sporadic, Winter 2010 |
General characteristics of 62 Streptococcus suis isolates characterized in this study.
The 62 isolates (Table 1; Figure 1) could be assigned into three known STs [ST28 (11 isolates), ST29 (five isolates), and ST7 (23 isolates)] and six novel STs [ST417 (five isolates), ST418 (three isolates), ST419 (three isolates), ST420 (four isolates), ST421 (four isolates), and ST422 (four isolates). ST29 belonged to the ST25 complex, ST28, and ST418 belonged to the ST28 clonal complex, and ST7 and ST419 belonged to the ST1 complex; the other remaining STs identified in this study could not be assigned into any known clonal complex. ST420 contained SLV with ST422, and these two STs constituted a doublet group. The two singletons ST417 and ST421 did not show three or more allelic matches to any ST in the entire database; thus, these singletons could not be placed in any group by eBURST.
FIGURE 1
All of the isolates from healthy pigs belonged to ST25, ST28, and ST1 complexes. Among the 26 isolates from diseased pigs, six belonged to the ST1 complex (three to each of ST7 and ST419), three were assigned to ST418 of the ST28 complex, and 17 were classified into six novel STs. The six novel STs were found in the isolates from diseased pigs.
The 23 novel ST strains were selected and subjected to PCR-based screening of four virulence markers, namely, mrp, sly, epf, and 89 K PaI (Table 2). 89 K PaI and mrp were absent from these strains. epf was detected in ST418 and ST419 strains but not in the other strains. sly was found in ST418, ST419, and ST422 strains but not in the other strains. ST417, ST420, and ST421 strains did not contain any of these virulence markers.
Table 2
| Sequence types | Presence (+) or absence (-) of | Strain selected for mouse infection | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| mrp | sly | epf | 89 K PaI | ||
| ST417 | - | - | - | - | HWS9 |
| ST418 | - | + | + | - | HJMS |
| ST419 | - | + | + | - | HDS |
| ST420 | - | - | - | - | HJB |
| ST421 | - | - | - | - | HLB |
| ST422 | - | + | - | - | Not selected |
| ST335 | + | - | - | - | HW07 |
Prevalence of virulence markers.
LETHALITY TO MICE
In mouse infection, one isolate was randomly selected from ST417 to ST420. Only one isolate from ST421 was included because ST421 and ST422 were unknown serotypes. The strains were coded as HWS9, HJMS, HDS, HJB, and HLB corresponding to ST417–ST421, respectively (Table 2). The ST335 strain HW07 (mrp+, sly-, epf-, and 89 K PaI-) is highly lethal to CD1 mice (); as such, this strain was used as a positive control of mouse infection.
The mortality rates of HW07, HDS, HJB, HWS9, HJMS, and HLB at 12 days post-infection were 75, 75, 62.5, 37.5, 12.5, and 12.5%, respectively (Figure 2A). These six strains could be roughly divided into three groups based on mortality rates, the time at which clinical symptoms manifested, the degree of severity of clinical symptoms, and the time at which death occurred: high virulence group (HW07, HDS, and HJB); moderate virulence group (HWS9); and low virulence group (HJMS and HLB).
FIGURE 2
The high virulence group could be further divided into super acute death subgroup (HJB) and acute death subgroup (HW07 and HDS). The super acute death subgroup rapidly displayed clinical symptoms, such as neurasthenia and hind limb disorders, causing death as early as 1 day post-infection; by contrast, the acute death subgroup manifested clinical symptoms much later and death occurred at 2–3 days post-infection. In summary, all of the five novel ST strains evaluated with the positive control strain were virulent to mice but exhibited remarkable differences in lethality to mice.
BACTERIAL COUNTS IN INFECTED MICE
The bacterial loads of the strains sharply increased and then gradually decreased in the blood of the infected mice (Figure 2B). The maximum bacterial load of the five novel ST strains in the blood was detected at 1 day post-infection; by contrast, the maximum bacterial load of the positive control strain HW07 was found at 2 days post-infection. Bacteria could be recovered from the blood until 4 days post-infection. These results indicated that all of the strains caused bacteremia in mice. The maximum bacterial load of the high virulence group (>5 × 105 CFU/ml) was larger than that of the moderate virulence group (<1 × 104 CFU/ml) and the low virulence group (∼5 × 104 CFU/ml). Other contributors, in addition to bacteremia, might have caused the death of mice in the moderate virulence group because this group exhibited a smaller maximum bacterial load than the low virulence group.
Viable bacteria could be recovered from the liver (Figure 2C) and the brain (Figure 2D) of all the dead mice. In both organs, the HJB strain displayed very low bacterial load (50 CFU/ml) probably because this strain caused the death of mice very rapidly; as a result, this strain could not abundantly reproduce in the organs. By contrast, the other strains yielded bacterial loads larger than 5 × 103 CFU/ml, indicating abundant bacterial proliferation in the organs as infection developed.
MICROSCOPIC LESIONS OF DEAD MICE
Different strains caused different degrees of histopathological injury in the liver (Figure 3A) and in the brain (Figure 3B) of the dead mice. The damage in the liver was positively correlated with the lethality to mice (Figure 3A). The high virulence group (HW07, HDS, and HJB) caused severe liver cell inflammation, vacuolar degeneration, and inflammatory cell infiltration. The moderate virulence group (HWS9) led to evident liver cell inflammation accompanied by slight vacuolar degeneration and lymphocyte infiltration. The low virulence group (HJMS and HLB) caused only slight lymphocyte infiltration without liver cell inflammation and vacuolar degeneration.
FIGURE 3
All the tested strains could break through the blood–brain barrier (BBB), causing bacterial encephalitis. The severity of brain injury was positively correlated with the bacterial load in the brain (Figure 3B). HW07 and HLB caused the most severe brain injury, which is a typical characteristic of suppurative encephalitis with heavy neutrophil necrosis and collapse. HDS, HJMS, and HWS9 induced the production of numerous glial cells. HJB caused slight inflammatory response in the brains, as indicated by limited glial cell production.
DISCUSSION
We isolated 62 S. suis strains from healthy and diseased pigs in the swine farms in northern China; among these strains, 40, 9, and 5 belonged to serotypes 2, 7, and 9, respectively; the eight remaining isolates had undetermined serotypes because the serum agglutination test with the 33 standard antisera of S. suis yielded negative results. These eight isolates may represent novel serotypes that should be further identified.
The majority of S. suis isolates from the farm-raised pigs tested in this study belonged to serotype 2; this result is consistent with that in a previous report (; ). All of these serotype 2 isolates were assigned into ST1 or ST28 clonal complex, indicating at least two parallel routes of clonal dissemination of these isolates. A total of 23 serotype 2 isolates (including 20 isolates from healthy pigs and three isolates from diseased pigs) were identified as ST7 strains. ST7 is a SLV of ST1 (allelic profile 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1) with increased virulence (); ST7 is also a member of the ST1 complex. ST7 strains that induced STSS and the presence of 89 K PaI caused the outbreaks of human infections in China in 1998 and 2005, respectively (; ; ; ). ST7 strains have been frequently isolated; as such, a routine survey of S. suis should be conducted in farm-raised pigs in northern China.
Piglets have been commonly used as experimental animal infection models to investigate S. suis pathogenicity. CD1 mice are highly sensitive to S. suis, and the virulence of S. suis in a CD1 mouse model is consistent with that in a piglet model (). S. suis-infected CD1 mice survive septicemia and later develop clinical signs of central nervous system disorders (such as locomotion problems, opisthotonus, and walking in circles), causing brain inflammation (). Therefore, the CD1 mouse is an effective experimental animal model to evaluate S. suis pathogenicity to cause shock and meningitis (; ). Compared with piglets, CD1 mice exhibit several advantages, including convenient operation and low price.
In the present study, HWS9, HJMS, HDS, HJB, and HLB corresponding to ST417–ST421 were chosen to infect the CD1 mice. All of these strains caused septicemia and meningitis, leading to the death of mice. Among the four known major virulence loci (mrp, sly, epf, and 89 K PaI), only epf and sly were detected in HJMS and HDS; this result indicated the presence of additional virulence factors contributing to the observed virulence of these five strains in the CD1 mice.
The five tested strains could be divided into three groups based on mortality rates, the time at which clinical symptoms manifested, the degree of severity of clinical symptoms, and the time at which death occurred: high virulence group (strains HDS and HJB), moderate virulence group (HWS9), and low virulence group (HJMS and HLB). In the high virulence group, HJB caused super acute death as early as 1 day post-infection; by contrast, HDS induced death one or more days later. HJB was negative for mrp, sly, epf, and 89 K PaI. HJB caused acute fatal septicemia; bacteria in vivo migrated to different organs and caused tissue damage, but small bacterial loads were found in the liver and in the brain. Our results suggested that large amounts of bacterial endotoxin may be the major cause of the death of mice.
HLB yielded a final mouse mortality rate of 12.5%, displaying a very low level of lethality to the CD1 mouse. Nevertheless, this strain could still penetrate BBB of the CD1 mouse, causing suppurative encephalitis in the brain. This pathogen might induce a loss of blood-cerebrospinal fluid barrier function, an upregulation of proinflammatory mediator, or an increased leukocyte trafficking; each of these processes likely results in the heavy breakdown of BBB. By contrast, the four other novel ST strains (HDS, HJB, HWS9, and HJMS) did not cause suppurative encephalitis possibly because these strains induced a rapid progress of septicemia; thus, infected animals rapidly died without causing heavy brain damage in late disease phases.
In summary, 62 S. suis strains were isolated from healthy and diseased pigs in four provinces (Heilongjiang, Jilin, Liaoning, and Hebei) of northern China. Serotype 2 strains accounted for the majority of these strains, and these serotype 2 strains could be assigned into ST1 or ST28 clonal complex. Six novel STs, including ST417, ST418, ST419, ST420, ST421, and ST422, were found. Experimental infection with representative strains from ST417 to ST421 indicated that all of the tested strains could cause septicemia and meningitis in the CD1 mice but with remarkable differences in virulence; as a consequence, the mice died. These results illustrated that the zoonotic strains of S. suis in China are continually evolving; therefore, increased surveillance of S. suis in farm-raised pigs should be conducted.
Statements
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the National Key Program for Infectious Diseases of China (2012ZX10004214-005-013) and the Special Fund for Agro-scientific Research in the Public Interest (201203056). The language of this manuscript was polished by EnPapers.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
REFERENCES
1
AdiriR. S.GophnaU.RonE. Z. (2003). Multilocus sequence typing (MLST) of Escherichia coli O78 strains.FEMS Microbiol. Lett.222199–203. 10.1016/S0378-1097(03)00295-7
2
AllenA. G.BolithoS.LindsayH.KhanS.BryantC.NortonP.et al (2001). Generation and characterization of a defined mutant of Streptococcus suis lacking suilysin.Infect. Immun.692732–2735. 10.1128/IAI.69.4.2732-2735.2001
3
ChanM. S.MaidenM. C.SprattB. G. (2001). Database-driven multi locus sequence typing (MLST) of bacterial pathogens.Bioinformatics171077–1083. 10.1093/bioinformatics/17.11.1077
4
ChenC.TangJ.DongW.WangC.FengY.WangJ.et al (2007). A glimpse of streptococcal toxic shock syndrome from comparative genomics of S. suis 2 Chinese isolates.PLoS ONE2:e315. 10.1371/journal.pone.0000315
5
Dominguez-PunaroM. C.SeguraM.PlanteM. M.LacoutureS.RivestS.GottschalkM. (2007). Streptococcus suis serotype 2, an important swine and human pathogen, induces strong systemic and cerebral inflammatory responses in a mouse model of infection.J. Immunol.1791842–1854. 10.4049/jimmunol.179.3.1842
6
EdgarR. C. (2004). MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput.Nucleic Acids Res.321792–1797. 10.1093/nar/gkh340
7
FearnheadP.SmithN. G.BarrigasM.FoxA.FrenchN. (2005). Analysis of recombination in Campylobacter jejuni from MLST population data.J. Mol. Evol.61333–340. 10.1007/s00239-004-0316-0
8
FeilE. J.LiB. C.AanensenD. M.HanageW. P.SprattB. G. (2004). eBURST: inferring patterns of evolutionary descent among clusters of related bacterial genotypes from multilocus sequence typing data.J. Bacteriol.1861518–1530. 10.1128/JB.186.5.1518-1530.2004
9
FengY.ZhangH.WuZ.WangS.CaoM.HuD.et al (2014). Streptococcus suis infection: an emerging/reemerging challenge of bacterial infectious diseases?Virulence5477–497. 10.4161/viru.2859528595
10
FittipaldiN.XuJ.LacoutureS.TharavichitkulP.OsakiM.SekizakiT.et al (2011). Lineage and virulence of Streptococcus suis serotype 2 isolates from North America.Emerg. Infect. Dis.172239–2244. 10.3201/eid1712.110609
11
HigginsR.GottschalkM. (1990). An update on Streptococcus suis identification.J. Vet. Diagn. Invest.2249–252. 10.1177/104063879000200324
12
HigginsR.GottschalkM. (1995). Distribution of Streptococcus suis capsular types in 1994.Can. Vet. J.36320.
13
KingS. J.LeighJ. A.HeathP. J.LuqueI.TarradasC.DowsonC. G.et al (2002). Development of a multilocus sequence typing scheme for the pig pathogen Streptococcus suis: identification of virulent clones and potential capsular serotype exchange.J. Clin. Microbiol.403671–3680. 10.1128/JCM.40.10.3671-3680.2002
14
LiM.ShenX.YanJ.HanH.ZhengB.LiuD.et al (2011). GI-type T4SS-mediated horizontal transfer of the 89K pathogenicity island in epidemic Streptococcus suis serotype 2.Mol. Microbiol.791670–1683. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2011.07553.x
15
LiM.WangC.FengY.PanX.ChengG.WangJ.et al (2008). SalK/SalR, a two-component signal transduction system, is essential for full virulence of highly invasive Streptococcus suis serotype 2.PLoS ONE3:e2080. 10.1371/journal.pone.0002080
16
LiuZ.ZhengH.GottschalkM.BaiX.LanR.JiS.et al (2013). Development of multiplex PCR assays for the identification of the 33 serotypes of Streptococcus suis.PLoS ONE8:e72070. 10.1371/journal.pone.0072070
17
MadsenL. W.SvensmarkB.ElvestadK.AalbaekB.JensenH. E. (2002). Streptococcus suis serotype 2 infection in pigs: new diagnostic and pathogenetic aspects.J. Comp. Pathol.12657–65. 10.1053/jcpa.2001.0522
18
OkwumabuaO.O’connorM.ShullE. (2003). A polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay specific for Streptococcus suis based on the gene encoding the glutamate dehydrogenase.FEMS Microbiol. Lett.21879–84. 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2003.tb1150.x
19
QuessyS.DubreuilJ. D.CayaM.HigginsR. (1995). Discrimination of virulent and avirulent Streptococcus suis capsular type 2 isolates from different geographical origins.Infect. Immun.631975–1979.
20
SeguraM. (2009). Streptococcus suis: an emerging human threat.J. Infect. Dis.1994–6. 10.1086/594371
21
TangJ.WangC.FengY.YangW.SongH.ChenZ.et al (2006). Streptococcal toxic shock syndrome caused by Streptococcus suis serotype 2.PLoS Med.3:e151. 10.1371/journal.pmed.0030151
22
WangH. M.KeC. W.PanW. B.KeB. X.ChenJ. D.DengX. L.et al (2008). MLST typing of Streptococcus suis isolated from clinical patients in Guangdong Province in 2005.Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao281438–1441.
23
WangK.ZhangW.LiX.LuC.ChenJ.FanW.et al (2013a). Characterization of Streptococcus suis isolates from slaughter swine.Curr. Microbiol.66344–349. 10.1007/s00284-012-0275-4
24
WangS.HuS.JinJ.LiuY.WangG.TuY.et al (2013b). Phylogenetic and pathogenetic analysis of Streptococcus suis serotype 7 strain HW07 isolated from diseased pig in China.Afr. J. Microbiol. Res.7406–412. 10.5897/AJMR12.2178
25
WisselinkH. J.JoostenJ. J.SmithH. E. (2002). Multiplex PCR assays for simultaneous detection of six major serotypes and two virulence-associated phenotypes of Streptococcus suis in tonsillar specimens from pigs.J. Clin. Microbiol.402922–2929. 10.1128/JCM.40.8.2922-2929.2002
26
YeC.ZhuX.JingH.DuH.SeguraM.ZhengH.et al (2006). Streptococcus suis sequence type 7 outbreak, Sichuan, China.Emerg. Infect. Dis.121203–1208. 10.3201/eid1708.060232
27
YuH.JingH.ChenZ.ZhengH.ZhuX.WangH.et al (2006). Human Streptococcus suis outbreak, Sichuan, China.Emerg. Infect. Dis.12914–920. 10.3201/eid1206.051194
28
ZhuS. R.WangZ. G.ChenE. F.YangT. T.ZhangZ.XuB. X.et al (2008). The emergence of candidate pathogenicity island 89K DNA sequence of Streptococcus suis isolated from sporadic patients in Zhejiang province.Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi291110–1113.
Summary
Keywords
Streptococcus suis, multilocus sequence typing, virulence
Citation
Wang S, Gao M, An T, Liu Y, Jin J, Wang G, Jiang C, Tu Y, Hu S, Li J, Wang J, Zhou D and Cai X (2015) Genetic diversity and virulence of novel sequence types of Streptococcus suis from diseased and healthy pigs in China. Front. Microbiol. 6:173. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2015.00173
Received
18 December 2014
Accepted
16 February 2015
Published
02 March 2015
Volume
6 - 2015
Edited by
Abd El-Latif Hesham, Assiut University, Egypt
Reviewed by
Torsten Hain, University of Giessen, German; Lefu Lan, Shanghai Institute of Materia Medica – Chinese Academy of Sciences, China; Raffaele Zarrilli, University of Naples Federico II, Italy
Copyright
© 2015 Wang, Gao, An, Liu, Jin, Wang, Jiang, Tu, Hu, Li, Wang, Zhou and Cai.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Xuehui Cai, State Key Laboratory of Veterinary Biotechnology, Harbin Veterinary Research Institute – Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Harbin, China e-mail: aci139@sina.com; Dongsheng Zhou, State Key Laboratory of Pathogen and Biosecurity, Beijing Institute of Microbiology and Epidemiology, Beijing, China e-mail: dongshengzhou1977@gmail.com
This article was submitted to Food Microbiology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Microbiology.
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.