Abstract
Campylobacter is well recognized as the leading cause of bacterial foodborne diarrheal disease worldwide, and is routinely found in meat originating from poultry, sheep, pigs, and cattle. Effective monitoring of Campylobacter contamination is dependent on the availability of reliable detection methods. The method of the International Organization for Standardization for the detection of Campylobacter spp. in food (ISO 10272-1:2006) recommends the use of Bolton broth (BB) as selective enrichment medium, including a pre-enrichment step of 4–6 h at 37°C to revive sublethally damaged cells prior to incubation for 2 days at 41.5°C. Recently the presence of abundantly growing extended spectrum β-lactamase producing Enterobacteriaceae (ESBL bacteria) has become one of the most important factors that interfere with the isolation of Campylobacter, resulting in false-negative detection. However, detailed growth dynamics of Campylobacter and its competitors remain unclear, where these would provide a solid base for further improvement of the enrichment procedure for Campylobacter. Other enrichment broths, such as Preston broth (PB) and BB plus clavulanic acid (BBc) have been suggested to inhibit competitive flora. Therefore, these different broths were used as enrichments to measure the growth kinetics of several strains of Campylobacter jejuni and ESBL bacteria separately, in co-culture and of strains in chicken samples. The maximum cell numbers and often the growth rates of Campylobacter in mixed culture with ESBL bacteria were significantly lower than in single cultures, indicating severe suppression of Campylobacter by ESBL bacteria, also in naturally contaminated samples. PB and BBc successfully diminished ESBL bacteria and might therefore be a better choice as enrichment medium in possibly ESBL-bacteria contaminated samples. The efficacy of a pre-enrichment step in the BB ISO-procedure was not supported for cold-stressed and non-stressed cells. Therefore, omission of this step (4–6 h at 37°C) might be advised to obtain a less troublesome protocol.
Introduction
Campylobacteriosis is the most commonly reported zoonosis in the European Union showing an increasing trend over the period of 2008–2014, and the occurrence of thermotolerant Campylobacter in broiler meat remains high at 38.4% in 2014 (). Concomitantly, broilers are often contaminated with extended spectrum β-lactamase producing Enterobacteriaceae (ESBL bacteria; ; ; ; ; ). The presence of these ESBL bacteria in food has become an important factor interfering with the isolation of Campylobacter, resulting in false-negative detection, since abundantly growing ESBL bacteria hamper the isolation of Campylobacter colonies ().
The protocol of the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) for detection of thermotolerant Campylobacter spp. in food and animal feeding stuffs (), describes the use of Bolton broth (BB) which is mixed 10:1 with the food sample including a 4–6 h pre-enrichment step at 37°C to resuscitate sublethally damaged cells before further enrichment is done at 41.5°C for 2 days. After enrichment, campylobacters are isolated on modified charcoal-cefoperazone-deoxycholate agar (mCCDA) and a second selective medium, with a principle different from mCCDA. The antibiotics in BB and mCCDA do not inhibit the growth of ESBL bacteria (), therefore the selectivity of the media is diminished. Nonetheless, detailed growth dynamics of Campylobacter and its competitors during enrichment remain unclear, and these would provide a good starting point for developing a proper enrichment procedure for Campylobacter. Furthermore, strong scientific evidence for better isolation of the pathogen using a pre-enrichment step at 37°C is scarce (, ).
Therefore, in this study, growth kinetics of Campylobacter and ESBL bacteria were determined during the enrichment procedure in BB and also in previously suggested alternative enrichment broths, such as Preston broth (PB; ; ) and BB plus clavulanic acid (BBc; ). Single strains and mixed cultures of Campylobacter and ESBL bacteria were tested and also naturally contaminated samples were examined. To create sublethally damaged cells, naturally contaminated chicken samples and inoculated chicken samples were cooled and/or frozen previously to the enrichment procedures to determine the effect of the pre-enrichment step at 37°C on the recovery of Campylobacter.
Materials and Methods
Bacterial Strains and Preparation of Stationary Phase Cultures
Campylobacter jejuni ATCC 33560 (= NCTC 11351), which is indicated as suitable control strain (), C. jejuni LU 160891 (Wageningen University; isolate from chicken filet), Campylobacter coli WCDM 00004, a strain advised for performance testing (), and Escherichia coli ESBL strains RIVM 2 and RIVM 3 (National Institute for Public Health and the Environment; isolates from chicken filet) were used as single cultures and as Campylobacter and ESBL–E. coli mixed cultures. Campylobacter stock cultures were grown in Heart Infusion broth (HI, Becton Dickinson) for 48 h at 37°C, then supplemented with 15% glycerol and stored at -80°C. E. coli stocks were cultured in Brain Heart Infusion broth (BHI, Becton Dickinson) for 24 h at 37°C, then supplemented with 15% glycerol and stored at -80°C as well. To obtain precultures for the growth experiments, C. jejuni was plated from the -80°C vials onto Columbia agar base (CAB, Oxoid, supplemented with 5% (v/v) lysed sheep blood (BioTrading Benelux B.V. Mijdrecht, Netherlands)) and grown for 48 h at 37°C, whereas ESBL E. coli was plated onto BHI agar or tryptone soya agar (TSA, Oxoid) and grown for 24 h at 37°C. Subsequently, single colonies were resuspended in HI and BHI for C. jejuni and E. coli, respectively, and cultured at 37°C for, respectively, 48 and 24 h to obtain stationary phase cultures. Cell concentrations were determined by plating appropriate dilutions on CAB for Campylobacter and on TSA for ESBL E. coli. Campylobacter was cultured under micro-aerobic conditions (5% O2, 10% CO2, 85% N2) in flushed jars (Anoxomat WS9000, Mart Microbiology, Drachten, Netherlands) unless stated otherwise.
Pretreatment of Chicken Samples
To determine the effect of a pre-enrichment step for 4–6 h at 37°C on the growth of sublethally damaged cells, inoculated chicken samples were stored at 4°C or -20°C, to mimic the situation in practice where chicken samples are purchased in cooled, respectively, frozen state. For that, chicken skin samples (5 g, confirmed previously to be Campylobacter-free, using ISO 10271-1 (), were kindly provided by Johan Roelofs, Plukon B.V., Wezep, Netherlands). The samples were stored at -20°C, thawed before use at 21°C for a maximum of 30 min and then inoculated with about 0.5 mL of diluted 48 h cultures [102 to 104 colony forming units (CFU) per 5 g chicken skin sample] of C. jejuni or C. coli and/or 24 h cultures of ESBL E. coli and subsequently stored in stomacher bags (Antonides, Oosterzee, Netherlands) for 60 h at 4°C or -20°C. Choices of inoculation levels were aiming for similar starting levels of Campylobacter and ESBL bacteria after the cooling or freezing treatment which were determined in separate experiments, where the reduction in cell numbers on chicken stored at 4°C and -20°C was quantified (data not shown). Frozen samples were thawed for 30 min at 21°C and cooled samples were allowed to reach room temperature for 5 min before chicken juice was prepared (see Preparation of Chicken Juice) and then enrichment procedures were started.
Preparation of Chicken Juice
To be able to take regular samples in time without disturbing the micro-aerobic conditions, growth curves were made in infusion bottles (100 mL), sealed with a thick (1 cm) rubber stopper and secured by an aluminum cap. Chicken juice of inoculated chicken skin (n = 12), was prepared to allow adding of chicken product to the broth using a syringe and at the same time to recover as much of the present micro flora as possible to meet the ISO-procedure (). Chicken skin juices were made by adding chicken skin at a 1:1 ratio to peptone physiological salt [PPS; 0.9% NaCl and 0.1 % peptone (Oxoid)] in a filter stomacher bag. The bag was massaged by hand for 2 min, and further homogenized for 30 s in a Pulsifier 100E (Microgen Bioproducts, Camberley, UK). Juice from the inoculated chicken skin was then immediately used in the enrichment procedures (see Measuring Growth Dynamics).
To examine naturally contaminated chicken liver, chicken juices were prepared similarly to the inoculated chicken skin as described above. For chicken wings, the same procedure was followed, except the samples were mixed in PPS at a 2:1 ratio. To confirm and quantify presence of Campylobacter and ESBL bacteria, 1 mL of juice was spread onto three Campyfood agar plates (CFA, bioMérieux) or Rapid’ Campylobacter agar plates (RCA, Bio-Rad) and onto Brilliance ESBL plates (Oxoid), respectively. Campylobacter plates were incubated for 48 h at 41.5°C (micro-aerobic conditions) after which confirmation was done microscopically and using a Latex agglutination test for Campylobacter (Microgen Bioproducts). Brilliance ESBL plates were incubated for 24 h at 37°C. All chicken juices were stored for 2–3 days in 50 mL Greiner tubes at 4°C until the results of the plating showed presence of Campylobacter and ESBL bacteria and these juices (n = 26) were then directly used in the enrichment procedures (see Measuring Growth Dynamics). For ESBL bacteria all colonies were counted on the Brilliance ESBL plates and no distinction was made between E. coli or other ESBL containing bacteria.
Measuring Growth Dynamics
Infusion bottles were filled with 45 mL of enrichment medium. After that, either 5 mL of diluted stationary phase cultures (to mimic a C. jejuni concentration of 2–3 log CFU g-1 chicken (), resulting in a starting concentration in the enrichment broth of about 1–2 log10 CFU mL-1), or 5 mL of chicken juice were added and the head space was flushed for 2 min with a gas-mixture of 5% O2, 10% CO2, and 85% N2 by a home-made gas-flushing device using syringes to puncture the rubber stopper of the bottles. BB (Oxoid) with selective supplement (Oxoid SR0208E) and 5% of sterile lysed horse blood (Oxoid) or sheep blood (Biotrading) was used as enrichment medium. Also alternative enrichment broths were used; to obtain BBc, 2 mg L-1 (end concentration) potassium clavulanate (Sigma-Aldrich) was added to BB (). PB was prepared as Nutrient Broth No. 2 (Oxoid) with Preston Campylobacter Selective Supplement (Oxoid SR0204), Campylobacter Growth Supplement (Oxoid), and 5% of lysed horse blood. Inoculated infusion bottles were incubated in water baths set at 37°C (4–6 h) and 41.5°C (up to 48 h).
At regular time intervals, 1 mL samples were taken from the bottles using a syringe and after every second sample, bottles were flushed again with the appropriate gas. Samples were immediately diluted and plated onto CFA, RCA, or mCCDA (Oxoid, supplemented with Oxoid SR155E) for counting Campylobacter and onto Brilliance ESBL agar for ESBL bacteria, and incubated as described in Section “Preparation of Chicken Juice.” In order to prevent swarming of Campylobacter colonies, all plates for enumeration were dried in a 41.5°C incubator for 15–20 min before plating. At least two biologically independent reproductions per strain or strain combination were performed on different days in all enrichment media.
Data Analysis
Plate counts were transformed to log10 CFU mL-1 and growth curves were constructed using Microsoft Excel 2010 and counts were fitted with the modified Gompertz Model () using the Solver add-in of Excel. The analysis was verified using TableCurve 2D V5.01 and a t-test was used to examine statistical significance in the growth parameters λ (lag phase; h) and μ (maximum growth rate; log10 h-1) of the microorganisms at the different conditions (P < 0.05).
Results
Single and Mixed Cultures
Growth of single C. jejuni strains in BB showed that using a start inoculum of 2 log10 CFU mL-1, the maximum level (8 log10 CFU mL-1) was reached after about 20 h (Figure 1A). ESBL E. coli showed higher growth rate, and reached stationary growth phase already after 10–12 h of incubation (Figure 1A). When both strains were cultured together, growth of ESBL E. coli was comparable to single culture conditions. C. jejuni, however, showed severe growth reduction in mixed culture with ESBL E. coli (Figure 1B). When ESBL E. coli reached the stationary phase, or just before that, growth of C. jejuni ceased and remained at a maximum level of 4–6 log10 CFU mL-1. Due to the limited number of data points in the beginning of these curves, lag phases could not be determined accurately but seemed to be non-significant in most cases. In general, growth rates of C. jejuni in BBc (Figures 2A,B) and PB (Figures 2C,D) were similar to growth in BB (P > 0.05), although some lag time was observed in BBc. However, BBc and PB successfully inhibited growth of ESBL E. coli, both in single cultures (data not shown) and in co-cultures with C. jejuni (Figures 2B,D). Similar results were found for all tested C. jejuni and ESBL E. coli strains. Since no difference was observed in data with and without pre-enrichment at 37°C, only graphs without pre-enrichment are shown (see Effect of Pre-enrichment) for the results described in Figures 1–3.
FIGURE 1
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 3
Naturally Contaminated Samples
Growth characteristics of Campylobacter and ESBL bacteria from most naturally contaminated samples show similar trends as mixed cultures (Figure 3), even though the naturally contaminated samples were stored refrigerated before enrichment. In BB, Campylobacter was mostly outcompeted (Figure 3A) by ESBL bacteria (n = 23). However, in 12% of the cases (n = 3), the pathogen was able to grow to similar levels as ESBLs (Figure 3B). The alternative enrichment broths PB (n = 7) and BBc (n = 11) always completely inhibited growth of ESBL bacteria (Figures 3C,D), comparable to the situation in laboratory strains (Figure 2).
Effect of Pre-enrichment
No significant difference (P > 0.05) was observed in growth kinetics of C. jejuni or ESBL E. coli grown with and without a pre-enrichment incubation step for 4–6 h at 37°C, in single cultures or mixed cultures in BB (Figures 4A,B). For C. jejuni no effect of pre-enrichment was found in BBc (Figure 4C) or PB (Figure 4D) either. Similar results were found for all tested Campylobacter and ESBL E. coli strains. Growth characteristics of the cold-stressed bacteria from naturally contaminated chicken samples showed similar results for BB, where no effect of the pre-enrichment step at 37°C was observed either (Figure 5A). Cooling (60 h at 4°C) and freezing (60 h at -20°C) of artificially contaminated chicken neck skin samples resulted in, respectively, a 0.3 log10 and 1.5 log10 average reduction in Campylobacter numbers (calculated in CFU mL-1 BB). ESBL bacteria were not reduced (max 0.1 log10 reduction) at 4°C and 0.1–0.3 log10 reduced after freezing. After applying these stress conditions, a pre-enrichment step of 6 h at 37°C did not lead to better growth of C. jejuni, C. coli or ESBL bacteria compared to enrichment starting immediately at 41.5°C for cold stored samples or frozen samples (Figures 5B,C, respectively).
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 5
Discussion
Selectivity of BB is based on the addition of four antibiotics; vancomycin, trimethoprim, amphotericin B, and cefoperazone, where the latter two are also used in the isolation plate (mCCDA) in the ISO-protocol for detection of Campylobacter (). Cefoperazone is an antibiotic belonging to the group of third generation cephalosporins, and the β-lactam ring in this antibiotic is easily hydrolyzed by ESBL-containing organisms, rendering them insensitive to the selective compound (). This fact, in combination with the increasing numbers of ESBL bacteria in chicken products (; ; ), results in reduced isolation efficacy of Campylobacter, due to overgrowth of ESBL bacteria (). In the present study, the proliferation during enrichment was followed for both Campylobacter and ESBL bacteria. ESBL bacteria showed significantly higher growth rates in BB than the target organism (P < 0.05). In mixed cultures with Campylobacter, this resulted also in higher maximum cell numbers for ESBL bacteria, where the ESBL bacteria probably profit from their higher growth rate and the growth of Campylobacter ceased just before, or when the ESBL bacteria entered the stationary phase in growth. The observed differences in maximum cell numbers in mixed growth cultures, showed a 2–4 log10 CFU reduction of the target organism compared to single cultures. This clearly explains the difficulties in recognizing Campylobacter colonies on an mCCDA plate if 100- to 10,000-fold ESBL bacterial colonies are present, keeping in mind that growth of ESBL bacteria on mCCDA is not hindered either (data not shown). In a limited number of the cases, however, Campylobacter did grow to similar levels as ESBL bacteria, apparently these strains were not too much affected by ESBL bacteria, which can be partly explained by a very low initial number of ESBL bacteria in some of the naturally contaminated samples or ESBL bacteria with different growth characteristics. The ratio in numbers of Campylobacter and ESBL bacteria and species or type of both microorganisms may also be contributing factors to the growth dynamics during enrichment procedures. In this study, starting levels of around 10–100 CFU mL-1 were chosen in the enrichment broths, to aim for realistic levels reported in chicken of about 10–50 CFU g-1 product for ESBL bacteria () and 10–1000 CFU g-1 for Campylobacter ().
To reduce growth of ESBL bacteria, β-lactamase inhibitors have been suggested (), for instance tazobactam in the isolation medium mCCDA, showing good repression of ESBL bacteria (). To increase selectivity of the enrichment in BB, addition of potassium clavulanate, another β-lactamase inhibitor, was suggested and examined (; ). In the current study, potassium clavulanate indeed inhibited the growth of ESBL bacteria in single and mixed cultures and also in naturally contaminated samples. The growth was not only inhibited, numbers of ESBL bacteria were even reduced to below the detection limit mostly within 4 h showing that selectivity of the medium was efficiently restored.
As alternative enrichment broth, PB has previously been described providing good selectivity against non-target flora in the enrichment procedure of Campylobacter (; ; ; ; ) with selective components polymyxin B, rifampicin, trimethoprim, and cycloheximide/amphotericin B. Polymyxin B is probably the component that inhibits the ESBL bacteria since it has been shown to be active against most Gram-negative bacteria (). used polymyxin B in enrichment broth with cefoperazone, and restored selectivity in that way. Some studies have, however, shown that PB may inhibit growth of some Campylobacter strains as well, resulting in false negative outcomes (; ), especially for C. coli (). In this study, growth curves in PB showed good growth of Campylobacter for both C. jejuni lab strains and for naturally occurring campylobacters on chicken; although in some cases the growth rate or maximum cell number were lower compared to growth in BB and BBc but this was not significant (P > 0.05). However, the medium successfully reduced growth of ESBL bacteria in all cases and their numbers dipped below the detection limit within 1–2 h. Levels of Campylobacter are yet high enough (6–9.5 log CFU mL-1) to produce colonies on the isolation medium if 10 μL is streaked.
Currently, the ISO-protocol for detection of Campylobacter is revised () and in this protocol, a distinction is made between different food samples, where PB is advised for samples in which high background flora such as ESBL bacteria is suspected. BB is still recommended for samples with low numbers of non-target organisms and low numbers of potentially stressed or sublethally damaged Campylobacter. The revision of the ISO-protocol is supported by the results described in this paper and using the new protocol will probably improve Campylobacter detection from food samples, provided that labs choose the correct enrichment broths for their specific samples. Furthermore, the advice to use two isolation media with different selective principles will also reduce the risk of overgrowth of Campylobacter by non-target flora in at least one of the agars thereby lowering the number of false negative detection results.
Thermotolerant Campylobacter, such as C. jejuni, cannot grow below 30°C, however, metabolic activity in the cells has been described even at 4°C, showing that not all processes in the cells have stopped () and cooling and freezing are considered to be stressful for Campylobacter in broth (; ) and in raw milk and river water (). Therefore, subsequent growth in detection procedures may be impeded. To overcome cold stress, a pre-enrichment step of 2–4 h at 37°C was described by , ) in water, milk, and poultry samples to resuscitate sublethally damaged cells at a less selective temperature. In this paper, cooling and freezing, being common factors in the production chain of poultry, were used to induce sublethal damage in the naturally present or inoculated Campylobacter on chicken before the advised BB enrichment procedure was started. However, the results do not support the efficacy of a pre-enrichment step, using BB at 37°C prior to incubation at 41.5°C as recommended in the ISO-protocol (). The different findings may be explained by the use of different enrichment broths and a more selective temperature of 43°C used by , ). The isolation temperature for Campylobacter has since been reduced to 41.5°C for practical reasons, to match with enrichment temperatures for detection of Salmonella and E. coli O157 (). Taking also into account that changing the incubation temperature from 37 to 41.5°C after 4–6 h of pre-enrichment is troublesome in routine laboratory practice, omission of the pre-enrichment step in the current procedure of enrichment in BB could be considered.
Statements
Author contributions
WH, WJ-R, and HB contributed to conception and design. WH and HB contributed to acquisition, analysis, and interpretation of data. WH, WJ-R, and HB drafted and/or revised the article.
Acknowledgments
The authors thank Maren Lanzl, Paula P. Bonilla, Jing Zang, Ourania Brella, and Jiayun Lu for excellent lab work.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Abbreviations
- BB
Bolton broth
- BBc
Bolton broth supplemented with clavulanic acid
- BHI
brain heart infusion broth
- CAB
Columbia agar base
- CFA
Campyfood agar plates
- CFU
colony forming units
- ESBLs
extended spectrum β-lactamase producing bacteria
- HI
heart infusion broth
- ISO
International Organization for Standardization
- mCCDA
modified charcoal-cefoperazone-deoxycholate agar
- PB
Preston broth
- RCA
Rapid’Campylobacter agar plates
References
1
BaylisC. L.MacPheeS.MartinK. W.HumphreyT. J.BettsR. P. (2000). Comparison of three enrichment media for the isolation of Campylobacter spp. from foods.J. Appl. Microbiol.89884–891. 10.1046/j.1365-2672.2000.01203.x
2
BoltonF. J.RobertsonL. (1982). A selective medium for isolating Campylobacter jejuni/coli.J. Clin. Pathol.35462–467. 10.1136/jcp.35.4.462
3
BortolaiaV.GuardabassiL.TrevisaniM.BisgaardM.VenturiL.Miki BojesenA. (2010). High diversity of extended-spectrum-lactamases in Escherichia coli isolates from Italian broiler flocks.Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.541623–1626. 10.1128/AAC.01361-09
4
ChonJ.-W.KimH.KimH.-S.SeoK.-H. (2013a). Improvement of modified charcoal-cefoperazone-deoxycholate agar by addition of potassium clavulanate for detecting Campylobacter spp. in chicken carcass rinse.Int. J. Food Microbiol.1657–10. 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2013.04.006
5
ChonJ.-W.KimH.YimJ.-H.KimM.-S.ParkJ.-H.SeoK.-H. (2013b). Development of a selective enrichment broth supplemented with bacteriological charcoal and a high concentration of polymyxin B for the detection of Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli in chicken carcass rinses.Int. J. Food Microbiol.162308–310. 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2013.01.018
6
ChongY.YoshikiyoI.KamimuraT. (2011). Genetic evolution and clinical impact in extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae.Inf. Genet. Evol.111499–1504. 10.1016/j.meegid.2011.06.001
7
Cohen StuartJ.Van den MunckhofT.VoetsG.ScharringaJ.FluitA.Leverstein-Van HallM. (2012). Comparison of ESBL contamination in organic and conventional retail chicken meat.Int. J. Food Microbiol.154212–214. 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2011.12.034
8
CorryJ. E. L.AtabayH. I. (2012). “Culture media for the isolation of Campylobacters, Helicobacters and Arcobacters,” inHandbook of Culture Media for Food and Water Microbiology3rd EdnedsCorryJ. E. L.CurtisG. D. W.BairdR. M. (Cambridge: Royal Society of Chemistry) 403–450.
9
CostaL.RadhouaniH.GomesC.IgrejasG.PoetaP. (2010). High prevalence of extended-spectrum β-lactamases Escherichia coli and vancomycin-resistant enterococci isolates from chicken products. A problem of public health.J. Food Safety30141–153. 10.1111/j.1745-4565.2009.00195.x
10
DepoorterP.PersoonsD.UyttendaeleM.ButayeP.De ZutterL.DierickK.et al (2012). Assessment of human exposure to 3rd generation cephalosporin resistant E. coli (CREC) through consumption of broiler meat in Belgium.Int. J. Food Microbiol.15930–38. 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2012.07.026
11
DierikxC.van der GootJ.FabriT.van Essen-ZandbergenA.SmithH.MeviusD. (2013). Extended-spectrum-beta-lactamase- and AmpC-beta-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli in dutch broilers and broiler farmers.J. Antimicrob. Chemother.6860–67. 10.1093/jac/dks349
12
European Food Safety Authority [EFSA] (2011). Analysis of the baseline survey on the prevalence of Campylobacter in broiler batches and of Campylobacter and Salmonella on broiler carcasses in the EU, 2008 – Part A: Campylobacter and Salmonella prevalence estimates.EFSA J.8:1503. 10.2903/j.efsa.2010.1503
13
European Food Safety Authority [EFSA] and European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control [ECDC] (2015). The European Union summary report on trends and sources of zoonoses zoonotic agents and food-borne outbreaks in 2014.EFSA J.13:4329. 10.2903/j.efsa.2015.4329
14
GoossensH.De BoeckM.CoignauH.VlaesL.Van den BorreC.ButzlerJ.-P. (1986). Modified selective medium for isolation of Campylobacter spp. from feces: comparison with Preston medium, a blood-free medium, and a filtration system.J. Clin. Microbiol.24840–843.
15
HabibI.UyttendaeleM.De ZutterL. (2011). Evaluation of ISO 10272: 2006 standard versus alternative enrichment and plating combinations for enumeration and detection of Campylobacter in chicken meat.Food Microbiol.281117–1123. 10.1016/j.fm.2011.03.001
16
HazelegerW. C.WoutersJ. A.RomboutsF. M.AbeeT. (1998). Physiological activity of Campylobacter jejuni far below the minimal growth temperature.Appl. Env. Microbiol.643917–3922.
17
HumphreyT. J. (1986). Techniques for the optimum recovery of cold injured Campylobacter jejuni from milk or water.J. Appl. Bacteriol.61125–132. 10.1111/j.1365-2672.1986.tb04265.x
18
HumphreyT. J. (1989). An appraisal of the efficacy of pre-enrichment for the isolation of Campylobacter jejuni from water and food.J. Appl. Bacteriol.66119–126. 10.1111/j.1365-2672.1989.tb02461.x
19
ISO (2006). ISO 10272-1:2006. Microbiology of Food and Animal Feeding Stuffs – Horizontal Method for Detection and Enumeration of Campylobacter spp. – Part 1: Detection Method.Geneva: ISO.
20
ISO (2015). ISO/DIS 10272-1:2015.Microbiology of the Food Chain – Horizontal Method for Detection and Enumeration of Campylobacter – Part 1: Detection Method.Geneva: ISO.
21
JassonV.SampersI.BotteldoornN.López-GálvezF.BaertL.DenayerS.et al (2009). Characterization of Escherichia coli from raw poultry in Belgium and impact on the detection of Campylobacter jejuni using Bolton broth.Int. J. Food Microbiol.135248–253. 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2009.09.007
22
JassonV.UyttendaeleM.RajkovicA.DebevereJ. (2007). Establishment of procedures provoking sub-lethal injury of Listeria monocytogenes, Campylobacter jejuni and Escherichia coli O157 to serve method performance testing.Int. J. Food Microbiol.118241–249. 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2007.07.016
23
KawamuraK.GotoK.NakaneK.ArakawaY. (2014). Molecular epidemiology of extended-spectrum β-lactamases and Escherichia coli isolated from retail foods including chicken meat in Japan.Foodborne Pathog. Dis.11104–110. 10.1089/fpd.2013.1608
24
MoranL.KellyC.CormicanM.McGettrickS.MaddenR. (2011). Restoring the selectivity of Bolton broth during enrichment for Campylobacter spp. from raw chicken.Lett. Appl. Microbiol.52614–618. 10.1111/j.1472-765X.2011.03046.x
25
OlsenR. H.BisgaardM.LöhrenU.RobineauB.ChristensenH. (2014). Extended spectrum β-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli isolated from poultry: a review of current problems, illustrated with some laboratory findings.Avian Pathol.43199–208. 10.1080/03079457.2014.907866
26
OverdevestI.WillemsenI.RijnsburgerM.EustaceA.XuL.HawkeyP.et al (2011). Extended-spectrum β-lactamase genes of Escherichia coli in chicken meat and humans, the Netherlands.Emerg. Infect. Dis.171216–1222. 10.3201/eid1707.110209
27
PayneD. J.CrampR.WinstanleyD. J.KnowlesD. J. (1994). Comparative activities of clavulanic acid, sulbactam, and tazobactam against clinically important betalactamases.Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.38767–772. 10.1128/AAC.38.4.767
28
PaulsenP.KanzlerP.HilbertF.MayrhoferS.BaumgartnerS.SmuldersF. J. M. (2005). Comparison of three methods for detecting Campylobacter spp. in chilled or frozen meat.Int. J. Food Microbiol.103229–233. 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2004.12.022
29
RayB.JohnsonC. (1984). Sensitivity of cold-stressed Campylobacter jejuni to solid and liquid selective environments.Food Microbiol.1173–176. 10.1016/0740-0020(84)90031-5
30
ScotterS. L.HumphreyT. J.HenleyA. (1993). Methods for the detection of thermotolerant campylobacters in food: results of an inter-laboratory study.J. Appl. Bact.74155–163. 10.1111/j.1365-2672.1993.tb03009.x
31
SmithS.MeadeJ.McGillK.GibbonsJ.BoltonD.WhyteP. (2015). Restoring the selectivity of modified charcoal cefoperazone deoxycholate agar for the isolation of Campylobacter species using tazobactam, a β-lactamase inhibitor.Int. J. Food Microbiol.210131–135. 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2015.06.014
32
Ugarte-RuizM.Gomez-BarreroS.PorreroM. C.AlvarezJ.GarcıaM.ComeronM. C.et al (2012). Evaluation of four protocols for the detection and isolation of thermophilic Campylobacter from different matrices.J. Appl. Microbiol.113200–208. 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2012.05323.x
33
UyttendaeleM.DebevereJ. (1996). Evaluation of Preston medium for detection of Campylobacter jejuni in vitro and in artificially and naturally contaminated poultry products.Food Microbiol.13115–122. 10.1006/fmic.1996.0015
34
ZwieteringM. H.JongenburgerI.RomboutsF. M.Van ’t RietK. (1990). Modeling of the bacterial growth curve.Appl. Env. Microbiol.561875–1881.
Summary
Keywords
ESBL, pre-enrichment, ISO 10272-1, Bolton broth, Preston broth, clavulanic acid, competition, inhibition
Citation
Hazeleger WC, Jacobs-Reitsma WF and den Besten HMW (2016) Quantification of Growth of Campylobacter and Extended Spectrum β-Lactamase Producing Bacteria Sheds Light on Black Box of Enrichment Procedures. Front. Microbiol. 7:1430. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.01430
Received
26 April 2016
Accepted
29 August 2016
Published
12 September 2016
Volume
7 - 2016
Edited by
Avelino Alvarez-Ordóñez, Teagasc Food Research Centre, Ireland
Reviewed by
M. Luisa De Garnica, University of León, Spain; Nabila Haddad, Oniris, France; Inge Van Damme, Ghent University, Belgium
Updates
Copyright
© 2016 Hazeleger, Jacobs-Reitsma and den Besten.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Wilma C. Hazeleger, wilma.hazeleger@wur.nl
This article was submitted to Food Microbiology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Microbiology
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.