Skip to main content


Front. Microbiol., 30 August 2017
Sec. Virology

Biology and Genomics of an Historic Therapeutic Escherichia coli Bacteriophage Collection

\r\nAbiyad Baig*Abiyad Baig1*Joan Colom*Joan Colom1*Paul BarrowPaul Barrow1Catherine SchoulerCatherine Schouler2Arshnee Moodley,Arshnee Moodley2,3Rob Lavigne,Rob Lavigne3,4Robert Atterbury*Robert Atterbury1* on behalf of the AntibioPhage consortium
  • 1School of Veterinary Medicine and Science, University of Nottingham Sutton Bonington Campus, Sutton Bonington, United Kingdom
  • 2Infectiologie et Santé Publique, Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, Université François Rabelais de Tours, Nouzilly, France
  • 3Department of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
  • 4Laboratory of Gene Technology, Department of Biosystems, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium

We have performed microbiological and genomic characterization of an historic collection of nine bacteriophages, specifically infecting a K1 E. coli O18:K1:H7 ColV+ strain. These phages were isolated from sewage and tested for their efficacy in vivo for the treatment of systemic E. coli infection in a mouse infection model by Smith and Huggins (1982). The aim of the study was to identify common microbiological and genomic characteristics, which co-relate to the performance of these phages in in vivo study. These features will allow an informed selection of phages for use as therapeutic agents. Transmission electron microscopy showed that six of the nine phages were Podoviridae and the remaining three were Siphoviridae. The four best performing phages in vivo belonged to the Podoviridae family. In vitro, these phages exhibited very short latent and rise periods in our study. In agreement with their microbiological profiles, characterization by genome sequencing showed that all six podoviruses belong to the Autographivirinae subfamily. Of these, four were isolates of the same species (99% identity), whereas two had divergent genomes compared to other podoviruses. The Siphoviridae phages, which were moderate to poor performers in vivo, exhibited longer latent and rise periods in vitro. Two of the three siphoviruses were closely related to each other (99% identity), but all can be associated with the Guernseyvirinae subfamily. Genome sequence comparison of both types of phages showed that a gene encoding for DNA-dependent RNA polymerase was only present in phages with faster replication cycle, which may account for their better performance in vivo. These data define a combination of microbiological, genomic and in vivo characteristics which allow a more rational evaluation of the original in vivo data and pave the way for the selection of phages for future phage therapy trails.


The rapid increase in antimicrobial resistance, is a major cause of concern for both the animal and human health, and threatens to render many clinically important antibiotics ineffective (Drulis-Kawa et al., 2012). There is now an urgent need for new antimicrobials and alternative approaches to infection control. Bacteriophages (phages) are one such approach with evidence of antibacterial properties, recently highlighted in 2016 by a joint United Kingdom Department of Health and Wellcome Trust-funded expert panel review of alternatives to antibiotics, and reviewed earlier (Drulis-Kawa et al., 2012; Nobrega et al., 2015).

Phages were discovered in the early twentieth century by Twort (1915) and d’Hérelle (1917). Soon after their discovery d’Herelle and others performed several trials using phages to treat bacterial infections in humans and animals. Although some of these trials were successful, they suffered from a lack of proper controls and the use of phage whose activity and reliability were unknown. This, together with the poor understanding at the time of the mechanism of bacterial pathogenesis, the nature of the interaction between bacteria and phages and the start of the antibiotic era, discredited the idea of using phages as antimicrobials in the West. The clinical use of phage continued in Eastern Europe, although studies published often lacked appropriate control groups and sometimes used phage alongside other antimicrobials, making it difficult to evaluate how much phage contributed to the efficacy of the treatment (Barrow and Soothill, 1997; Summers, 1999, 2001).

Phage therapy continues in Russia and Eastern Europe to this day (Expert Round Table on Acceptance and Therapy Re-implementation of Bacteriophage, 2016). In the West, phage therapy was revived in the 1980s by Smith and Huggins in a series of carefully controlled experiments using systemic Escherichia coli and Enterotoxigenic E. coli (ETEC) infections in mice, calves, pigs, and sheep (Smith and Huggins, 1980, 1982, 1983; Smith et al., 1987a,b). These studies highlighted that appropriate selection of phages and their application in infections where phage activity is likely to be optimal, can lead to a successful outcome.

Smith and Huggins’s (1982) study reported the isolation of phages which attached specifically to the K1 capsular antigen of E. coli. The capsular polysaccharides (K antigens) are linked to virulence in E. coli (Jann and Jann, 1987), and strains possessing the K1 antigen exhibit increased invasiveness and are associated with septicaemia and meningitis (Smith and Huggins, 1982; Silver and Vimr, 1990). The K1-specific phages were used to treat and prevent E. coli septicaemia or meningitis in mice (Smith and Huggins, 1982). Some phage-resistant mutants were recovered following the experiments but these were largely K1 negative, and thus avirulent. There were differences in therapeutic efficacy between the nine phages tested. Of the nine, one, phage R, was more effective than any of the antibiotic treatments used, which included several doses of streptomycin. In the present study, we have performed detailed microbiological and genomic characterization of the nine phages originally isolated by Smith and Huggins. Our findings define common phenotypic and genomic characteristics which can be related to the differences in the in vivo performance of these phage. These features could be useful in the selection of phage from closely related phage groups which are most likely to be effective biological control agents.

Materials and Methods

Bacterial Isolate and Phage Collection

The host bacterium E. coli O18:K1:H7 ColV+, referred to as MW, and the collection of nine phages used in this study are those isolated by Smith and Huggins (1982). Briefly, MW is a prototrophic, non-haemolytic human clinical E. coli isolated from the brain of a baby suffering from meningitis and which produces experimental septicaemia in mice, chickens and colostrum-deprived calves (Smith and Huggins, 1980, 1982). The nine phages were isolated from samples of crude sewage and from pig markets by Smith and Huggins (1982). In compliance with the new taxonomic classification for phages (Lavigne et al., 2008), the original names of phages have been modified and listed under ‘Phage name’ (Table 1) with the ‘Phage ID’ referring to the original name of phages (Smith and Huggins, 1982).


TABLE 1. Biological and genomic characteristics of phages used in this study.

Growth Rate of MW E. coli

The mid-exponential phase of MW E. coli was determined by growing the bacteria in LB broth. For this, LB broth was inoculated with an overnight culture of MW E. coli to an OD600nm of 0.01. The first sample was taken at the point of inoculation and the culture was incubated shaking at 100 rpm at 37°C. Samples were taken out at hourly intervals for 7 h and finally after 24 h to enumerate the bacteria (Miles et al., 1938). For this, each sample was serially diluted in Phosphate Buffered Saline (PBS, Sigma–Aldrich) and 0.1 mL of each dilution was spread onto LBA plates which were then incubated overnight at 37°C. After incubation, the bacterial colonies were counted and CFU/mL calculated.

Propagation of Phages in MW E. coli

All phage were propagated using MW as the host E. coli strain. Phage lysates were produced either in Luria-Bertani (LB) broth or on LB agar (LBA) plates (Sigma–Aldrich). Broth lysates were prepared by inoculating LB with an overnight culture of MW to achieve an optical density of 0.01 (OD600nm). The culture was incubated at 37°C, shaking (100 rpm) for 2 h until the cells reached mid-exponential growth phase (108 CFU/mL) before infecting with a phage suspension at a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 0.1. The culture was further incubated with gentle agitation (100 rpm) overnight at 37°C. Phage lysates were centrifuged at 5,000 × g for 10 min to pellet the cellular debris. The supernatant containing the phage was filtered using a 0.22 μm filter (Millipore). The phage were enumerated by serially diluting the lysate in SM buffer (50 mM Tris-Cl (pH 7.5), 0.1M NaCl, 8 mM MgSO4⋅7H2O and 0.01% gelatin). A 0.1 mL volume of each dilution was added separately to 3 mL of molten LBA containing 0.5% agar and 0.1 mL of an overnight culture of MW. This was poured onto LBA plates containing 1% agar which were then incubated overnight at 37°C. All phage lysates were stored at 4°C until required.

Polyethylene Glycol (PEG) Precipitation

A high titre phage suspension (1010–1011 PFU/mL) was produced by PEG precipitation according to the method of Yamamoto et al. (1970). Briefly, overnight phage lysates were produced in 2L Erlenmeyer flasks. The flasks were removed from the incubator and supplemented with 1 μg/mL each of DNase and RNase (Sigma–Aldrich) before incubating at room temperature for 30 min. To allow the phage particles to dissociate from cellular debris, NaCl was added to a final concentration of 1M and the lysates were incubated on ice for 1 h. The cellular debris was removed by centrifugation at 11,000 × g (Beckman Coulter Avanti J-E series centrifuge) for 10 min at 4°C. The phage particles were precipitated by incubating the lysates overnight at 4°C with PEG 8000 (Sigma–Aldrich) to a final concentration of 10% w/v. The precipitated phage were pelleted by centrifugation at 35,000 × g for 15 min at 4°C. The phage pellet was re-suspended by soaking in SM buffer for 1 h at room temperature. Phage were extracted from PEG and cell debris by adding an equal volume of chloroform to the lysates which were mixed by gentle inversion for 30 s and the aqueous phase containing phage particles (upper layer) was separated by centrifugation at 13,000 × g (Thermo Electron Corporation Heraeus Pico 17 centrifuge) for 20 min.

Phage Purification by Ultracentrifugation

High titre phage preparations were further purified using a caesium chloride (CsCl) gradient as described by Sambrook and Russell (2001) and adapted by Hooton et al. (2011). Briefly, CsCl was mixed with the phage lysate to a final concentration of 0.75 g/ml. The mixture was centrifuged at 240,000 × g for 24 h (15°C) (Beckman TL 100 series centrifuge). The phage band was extracted by piercing through the ultracentrifuge tube with a sterile 21-gauge hypodermic needle (Medisave). To remove the residual CsCl, the sample was filtered using an Amicon® Ultra -0.5 mL 30 K membrane filter (Millipore) as per the manufacturer instructions.

Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM)

The sample (3 μL) was applied to a hydrophilic (freshly glow-discharged) carbon-coated Pioloform film coated 300 square mesh copper EM grid (Agar Scientific Ltd.) and left for 2 min to adsorb. Excess sample was removed with a small piece of Whatman No. 1 filter paper, leaving a thin film of sample on the grid surface. The grid was rinsed twice immediately by adding 5 μl distilled de-ionized water and removing excess as described above. One drop of uranyl acetate (1% and 0.22 μm filtered) was applied to the grid and the excess removed immediately. The grid was then allowed to dry. Once dry, the grids were observed on a JEOL JEM-1400 TEM with an accelerating voltage of 100 kV. Digital images were recorded using a SIS Megaview III digital camera with iTEM software.

Phage Adsorption

For each anti-K1 phage, a MW E. coli culture at mid-exponential phase was infected at an MOI of 0.1. The adsorption rate for each phage was determined by taking samples every 2 min for up to 12 min. Bacterial cells with adsorbed phage were removed by centrifugation at 13,000 × g. The supernatant was then filtered using 0.45 μm filter (Millipore) and unbound phage were enumerated on LBA overlay containing 0.1 mL of MW E. coli on LBA plates, incubated overnight at 37°C. The adsorption period was considered as the time taken to achieve a 90% reduction in free, unbound phage (i.e., 1 log10 PFU/mL reduction from the initial titre) (Weber-Dąbrowska et al., 2016).

One-Step Growth Curve

A mid-exponential phase MW culture was infected with the respective phage at an MOI of 0.1. The phage particles were allowed to adsorb to the time of 90% adsorption as calculated in the in vitro adsorption assay. The lysate was then diluted to 104 PFU/ml in LB broth (Hyman and Abedon, 2009). Samples of the infected culture were collected every 2 min for 20 min for the Podoviridae or every 5 min for up to 60 min for the Siphoviridae, and unbound phages were enumerated on LBA overlays as described above. The burst size was calculated as the difference in the plaque forming unit (PFU) between the end of rise period and the latent period (Bolger-Munro et al., 2013).

Genomic DNA Extraction and Sequencing

DNA extraction of the ultracentrifuged phage preparation was performed using the Wizard® DNA clean-up system (Promega). Briefly, the phage sample was mixed thoroughly with the DNA Clean-up resin to break open the capsids and release DNA. The DNA and resin mix was filtered through a mini-column using a syringe barrel. The mini-column was washed with 80% isopropanol and the purified DNA was eluted with pre-warmed deionized water.

Genome sequencing of the phage was completed at NU-Omics facility, University of Northumbria. A DNA sequencing library of the phage genomic DNA (50 ng) was created using Illumina Nextera XT DNA preparation kit and libraries were sequenced using Illumina V2 2 bp × 250 bp chemistry on the Illumina MiSeq Platform.

Phage Genome Sequence Analysis

Raw sequence reads in FastQ files were quality-filtered using Cutadapt (Martin, 2011) and Sickle (Joshi and Fass, 2011). Due to massive over sequencing a subset of reads was taken for each phage, to enable manageable assemblies with read depths of approximately 200× (quality filtered FastQ data was randomly subsampled using a Python script1). The sequence reads were de novo assembled using SPAdes (v3.6.2) (Bankevich et al., 2012) and in each case the phage genomes were resolved as a single contig. To circularize the phage genome, the beginning and the end of each assembled genome was joined with a short string of ‘Ns.’ The raw sequence reads from the quality filtered FastQ files were re-mapped to the above genome sequence, using Stampy (Lunter and Goodson, 2011) and visualized using Samtools and BCFtools (Li et al., 2009). Any missing nucleotide bases replaced the N’s, confirming the circularity of the phage genome. The intactness of each phage genome was also confirmed using PHAST (Zhou et al., 2011). Phage genomes were annotated using Prokka (Seemann, 2014), which uses Prodigal to predict coding sequences (CDSs) and also defines the ribosomal and transfer RNA genes (rRNA and tRNA), non-coding RNA and leader signal peptides. The nucleotide sequence of CDSs was used to perform blast searches against the Conserved Domain Database (CDD) (v3.15) of NCBI (Marchler-Bauer et al., 2015). The predicted functionality of the phage genomes was further improved by comparing the functional annotation generated by Prokka, CDD and the best matching published genome in NCBI. Nucleotide and protein comparisons were performed using the command line BLAST+ algorithm (Camacho et al., 2009). The nucleotide and amino acid sequence alignments were produced by ClustalW (CLUSTAL 2.1) (Thompson et al., 1994). The maximum likelihood phylogenetic analysis was performed using the generalized time-reversible (GTR) model to infer nucleotide evolution and Jones-Taylor-Thornton 1992 (JTT +CAT) model for protein evolution, with FastTree (Price et al., 2009). The nucleotide BLAST comparison figures were generated using Easyfig (Sullivan et al., 2011). The color coding for functional annotation was added using Inscape 0.922. The sequence read data of phage genomes has been submitted to the European Nucleotide Archive (ENA) and the annotated phage genome sequences have been deposited in the NCBI GenBank database (Supplementary Table S1).


Phage Morphology

Transmission electron microscopy showed that six of nine phage studies used by Smith and Huggins (1982) belonged to the Podoviridae family (Table 1), which are known to have short, non-contractile tails (Ackermann, 2000). Phage vB_EcoP_R (R), the best performing phage reported by Smith and Huggins (Figure 1A), was also a podovirus with an icosahedral head (average diameter 46 ± 5 nm) and a very short tail (mean diameter 10 ± 5 nm). The remaining three phages belonged to the Siphoviridae family (Table 1). Phages from this family have a long flexible non-contractile tail with tail fibers (Fokine and Rossmann, 2014). For example, phage vB_EcoS_P (P) (Figure 1B), the poor performing phage in the in vivo study (Smith and Huggins, 1982) was a Siphoviridae phage of 150 ± 5 nm in size, with icosahedral head (average diameter 49 ± 5 nm) and long tail (average diameter 101 ± 5 nm).


FIGURE 1. Negative staining transmission electron microscopic images of phages after ultracentrifugation. (A) Podoviridae phage R. (B) Siphoviridae phage P.

Growth Characteristics

Interestingly, high titre phage lysates (109–1010 PFU/ml) for the Siphoviridae phages could only be produced using the plate lysate approach, whereas high titre lysates were easily achieved for the six Podoviridae phages from liquid lysates in LB broth. The time taken for the phages to adsorb to MW E. coli varied between 4 and 8 min. The best performing phages from the Smith and Huggins’s in vivo study, Podoviridae phages R, vB_EcoP_D (D), vB_EcoP_B (B) and vB_EcoP_C (C), exhibited the shortest latent period (<2 min), a rapid rise period (2–6 min) with a small burst size (19–48 PFU per infected cell). The growth cycle for these four podoviruses was between 10 and 16 min (Table 1). The Podoviridae phages vB_EcoP_F (F) and vB_EcoP_K (K) were moderate performers in the in vivo study (Smith and Huggins, 1982 and Table 1). Although, phage F had a latent period of <2 min like the best performing phages in vivo (R, D, B and C), it showed a large burst size (213 PFU per infected cell). Finally, phage K had the longest latent period of 8 min followed by a rise period of 8 min and the longest growth cycle of 20 min, compared to the other podoviruses. The three Siphoviridae phages [vB_EcoS_G (G), vB_EcoS_L (L), P] were moderate to poor performers in the in vivo experiment. These phages showed a longer latent (10–35 min) and rise period (10–24 min) and there was wider variation in the burst sizes between these phages, ranging between 3 and 315 PFU per infected cell. The duration of growth cycle in the three Siphoviridae phages was longer (28–53 min), compared with the Podoviridae phages (Table 1).

Genome Sequence Analysis

Illumina MiSeq sequencing generated approximately 150–650 million basepairs (bp) per phage genome. A subsample of this data was used to assemble each phage genome at a read depth of approximately 200× (Supplementary Table S1).

Genome sequence analysis showed that the six Podoviridae phages had genome sizes that ranged between 38025 and 45259 bps, with a G+C content ranging between 45 and 49% and contained 46–61 CDSs. The remaining three Siphoviridae phages had genomes of 41039–41624 bps in size, with a higher G+C content of 51% and their genomes were composed of 62–68 CDSs (Table 1).

To predict the type of termini of nine phages, the amino acid sequence of the large terminase protein from these phages was compared with the terminase protein from published phages with well-studied DNA packaging mechanisms (Casjens and Gilcrease, 2009). The amino acid sequence of the large terminase subunit from Escherichia virus K1E, K1F, K1G and K1H, was also includes as the best matching published sequence to the Podoviridae and Siphoviridae phages in this study. The phylogenetic analysis showed that the six Podoviridae phages R, B, C, D, K and F were placed in the clade with the phages with short direct terminal repeats (Figure 2). The phages R, B, C, D and K were closely related to the Escherichia virus K1E and the phage F grouped with the Escherichia virus K1F. The Siphoviridae phages along with the Escherichia virus K1G and K1H formed a clade, and were closely related with the phages with different headful packaging strategies (Figure 2). Further comparison of the Podoviridae phages R, B, C, D and K with the Escherichia virus K1E showed that these phages have short direct terminal repeats of 250–289 bp in length with 92–96% sequence identity with the short direct terminal repeats in the Escherichia virus K1E. In the phage F, each short direct terminal repeat was 165 bp in length and showed 88% identity to the short direct terminal repeats in Escherichia virus K1F.


FIGURE 2. The maximum likelihood phylogenetic comparison of the amino acid sequence of the large terminase subunit of nine phages (Smith and Huggins, 1982) with the large terminase subunit from selected published tailed phages with well characterized DNA packaging strategy.

The phylogenetic analysis comparing the Podoviridae phages with selected representative phage species from all genera of the subfamily Autographivirinae showed that the best performing phages in vivo, R, D, C and B grouped together and were closely related to Aeromonas phage phiAS7, an unassigned phage in the subfamily Autographivirinae (Figure 3). Phage K was more closely related to the phage species in the genus Sp6virus of the subfamily Autographivirinae. The Escherichia virus K1E was also included in the genus Sp6virus. Finally, phage F was included in a clade with two unclassified phages of subfamily Autographivirinae of which the best matched phage genome was of Escherichia phage PE3-1, a member of phage representing the T7virus genus (Figure 3).


FIGURE 3. The maximum likelihood phylogenetic comparison of the Podoviridae phages (Smith and Huggins, 1982) to the selected published genomes of phage species from all genera of subfamily Autographivirinae.

The BLASTn comparison of the Podoviridae phage genomes using phage R as the reference showed an average of 99% identity with phages B, C and D (Figure 4). The moderately performing Podoviridae phages, K and F had divergent genomic content compared to the best performing Podoviridae phages R, D, C and B. Fourteen genes present in the best performing phage R were divergent from the genome of phage K. These included 10 genes with predicted hypothetical function and the remaining four genes encoding for DNA-dependent RNA polymerase, bacteriophage 1.1 protein, DNA mimic Ocr and a homing endonuclease. Finally, the genomic content of phage F differed most among the other six Podoviridae phages (Figure 4 and Supplementary Table S2). Phylogeny and the nucleotide sequence comparison of the gene encoding DNA-dependent RNA polymerase from the Podoviridae phages R, B, C, D and F showed that the phages R, B, C and D were highly identical to each other (99–100%). Phage F only shared 47% nucleotide sequence identity with the phages, R, B, C and D based on the nucleotide sequence of DNA-dependent RNA polymerase (Supplementary Figures S1, S2).


FIGURE 4. A BLASTn comparison of the Escherichia virus K1E and six Podoviridae phages, constructed with EasyFig.

The phylogenetic analysis comparing the three Siphoviridae phages (P, G and L) with the published genomes from all genera of the subfamily Guernseyvirinae grouped the three phages in one clade, closely related to the two Salmonella phages (Salmonella phage wksl3 and Salmonella phage SS3e) in genus Jerseyvirus (Figure 5). Comparative analysis of the genome of the poor performing Siphoviridae phage P with that of the phages G and L showed that phage P contained nine genes which were divergent from phages G and L. Five of the nine genes had functions related to putative Mte8-like protein, phage tail assembly chaperone, superinfection immunity protein, putative helicase-primase, HNH endonuclease and the remaining four were predicted hypothetical function genes (Figure 6 and Supplementary Table S3).


FIGURE 5. The maximum likelihood phylogenetic comparison of the Siphoviridae phages (Smith and Huggins, 1982) to the published genomes of phage species from all genera of subfamily Guernseyvirinae.


FIGURE 6. A BLASTn comparison of three Siphoviridae phages, constructed with EasyFig.

The gene encoding an endosialidase was present in all nine phages (Figures 4, 6). The phylogenetic analysis and comparison of nine phages based on the nucleotide sequence of the endosialidase gene showed that the Podoviridae phages R, B, C, D, K and F were closely related to each other with percentage sequence identity ranging between 92 and 100%. The Siphoviridae phages P, G and L shared >95% endosialidase nucleotide sequence identity with each other and were only distantly related to six Podoviridae phages with the nucleotide sequence identity of 52% (Supplementary Figures S3, S4).


Smith and Huggins (1982) tested the performance of nine K1 specific E. coli phages for the treatment of septicaemia, using mice model of infection. In these pioneering phage therapy experiments, the mice were infected by intramuscular or intracerebral route with MW E. coli. The K1 specific phages were administered intramuscularly to treat the infection. Interestingly, not all phages tested were equally effective and showed a gradient of treatment efficiency, noted after 8 h interval between infection and treatment (Smith and Huggins, 1982 and Table 1). From the best performing phages, phage R was investigated further and was more effective in treatment than multiple doses of either tetracycline, trimethoprim, ampicillin or chloramphenicol. It was also reported that phage R and the other of the more effective phages cleared broth cultures of the K1 positive strain more quickly than those which were less effective (Smith and Huggins, 1982).

In the present study, we report the microbiological and genomic characteristics of these nine K1 specific E. coli phages and relate these characteristics to their performance in the in vivo study. It was interesting to observe that even though all nine phages were K1-specific, morphologically they belonged to two different phage families (Podoviridae and Siphoviridae) (Figure 1). There were also differences between the podoviruses and siphoviruses based on their growth profiles. The best performing phages in Smith and Huggins’s in vivo study belonged to the Podoviridae family, with a faster replication cycle characterized by shorter latent and rise periods. In contrast, the Siphoviridae phages which were moderate to poor performers, exhibited longer latent and rise periods (Table 1). These differences were observed in the bacterial growth media (LB) unlike the report by Bull et al. (2002) in which the differences in the replication of K1-specific and non-K1 phage could only be observed in mouse sera. This suggests that phenotypic differences between these phages can be observed without the need for any specialist growth media. In a study of T7-like phages, a phage KPO1K2, capable of infecting Klebsiella pneumoniae isolate B5055, was a Podoviridae phage and was proposed as a potential therapeutic agent against this pathogen. High titres of phage KPO1K2 were observed in the kidney and urinary bladder 6 h after intraperitoneal injection in infected mice. The growth profile of PhiKPO1K2 showed a latent period of 15 min and a burst size of 140 (Verma et al., 2009). Another study describing the characterization of lytic phages for the treatment of multidrug resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae showed that both Podoviridae and Siphoviridae phages had a similar latent period of 15 min and a burst size of ∼50–60 (Kęsik-Szeloch et al., 2013). Although these studies suggest a longer latent period for being the best phage, our study suggests that the Autographivirinae phages that replicate faster in liquid culture, performed better in the mouse infection model. In contrast, the Guernseyvirinae phages that replicated more slowly due to longer time (latent period) required to assemble into complete phage particles performed poorly in vivo. This is also highlighted by the fact that it was difficult to produce high titre preparations of the Siphoviridae phages in the liquid LB media, requiring culture on LBA plates. It remains to be seen whether this is a general phenomenon for other phages or it is just restricted to the phages of these taxonomic groups.

A characteristic of K1 phage genomes is the presence of a gene encoding for endosialidase which accounts for the phage specificity to the K1 capsular antigen of the K1 E. coli strains (Tomlinson and Taylor, 1985; Mushtaq et al., 2005). The predicted gene encoding an endosialidase was present in all nine K1 phages confirming the specificity of these phages to the K1 E. coli strain. The phylogenetic placement of the four best performing phages (R, D, B and C) and the moderate performing phage F as closely related to the unassigned and unclassified members of the subfamily Autographivirinae suggests that these phages have divergent genomes compared to the phages in other genera within this subfamily. However, phage K which was a moderate performing phage of all Podoviridae phages had a more resolved position in the phylogeny as being closely related to the phages from genus Sp6virus which includes the Escherichia virus K1E. The three Siphoviridae phages were more closely related to the Salmonella phages in the genus Jerseyvirus which reflects that these phages may also infect Salmonella strains.

The best performance of Podoviridae phages R, D, B, and C in vivo could be associated with a combination of their rapid replication cycle and the presence of the gene encoding for DNA-dependent RNA polymerase in the genome of these phages. Although the phage K was phylogenetically closely related to the Escherichia virus K1E, many genes in the genome of this phage were divergent from the Escherichia virus K1E, including the gene encoding for DNA-dependent RNA polymerase suggesting that phage K had diverged from the phages in the genus Sp6virus. In phage T7, the phage-dependent RNA polymerase and the bacteriophage 1.1 protein are the early gene products which play a role in regulating host transcription and protein synthesis (McAllister and Barrett, 1977). The phage T7 RNA polymerase is also directly involved in phage DNA replication (Hinkle, 1980). If the gene encoding phage-dependent RNA polymerase is functional, it enables a rapid shut-off of host transcription by 5 min after infection, thus allowing a much faster replication cycle of the phages. In the absence of this gene, shut-off of host transcription is delayed and is instead activated by the bacteriophage 1.1 protein after 15 min of infection. In the absence of all early gene products, the host shut-off is observed at least 30 min after the infection (McAllister and Barrett, 1977). The moderate and poor performing phages in this study lacked these genes. The absence of these genes may be responsible for the longer latent period observed and thus the poor performance of these phages in vivo, as more time would be required to shut-off the host transcription. The moderate performance of phage F in vivo may also be linked to its different genomic content compared to the four best performing phages (R, D, B and C) and a large burst size. Similarly, the presence of the gene encoding the superinfection immunity protein in the Siphoviridae phage P, which is a characteristic of prophages (Brüssow and Kutter, 2005) may also explain its poor performance in vivo. Selecting phage based on the phenotypic and genomic characteristics may not guarantee success in vivo (Tsonos et al., 2014) but if common phenotypic and genomic features can be identified then these can certainly be used to make targeted phage selection and could also help in reducing the number of animals used in experiments. In the K1-specific phages, the presence of the gene encoding for DNA-dependent RNA polymerase only in the genomes of phages with very fast replication cycle and their best performance in vivo suggests the combination of these phenotypic and genomic characteristics might be used as a marker for selection of suitable phages for phage therapy trails in the future.

Member of the Antibiophage Consortium

University of Nottingham: Robert Atterbury, Paul Barrow, and Abiyad Baig. University of Copenhagen: Jens Peter Christensen, Arshnee Moodley, and Dziuginta Jakociune. INRA: Catherine Schouler. KU Leuven: Rob Lavigne and Jeroen Wagemans.

Author Contributions

RA, PB, CS, AM, and RL conceived the study. AB, JC, PB, and RA produced the data. AB and JC analyzed the data. AB, JC, PB, CS, AM, RL, and RA wrote the paper.


This study was supported by the AntibioPhage project, funded by an Animal Health and Welfare ERA-Net (ANIHWA) grant from the EU FP-Horizon 2020 programme. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.


We thank Andrew Warry, School of Veterinary Medicine and Science, The University of Nottingham for help with the bioinformatics of phage.

Supplementary Material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at:


  1. ^
  2. ^


Ackermann, H. W. (2000). Basic phage electron microscopy. Methods Mol. Biol. 501, 113–126. doi: 10.1007/978-1-60327-164-6_12

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bankevich, A., Nurk, S., Antipov, D., Gurevich, A. A., Dvorkin, M., Kulikov, A. S., et al. (2012). SPAdes: a new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J. Comput. Biol. 19, 455–477. doi: 10.1089/cmb.2012.0021

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Barrow, P. A., and Soothill, J. S. (1997). Bacteriophage therapy and prophylaxis: rediscovery and renewed assessment of potential. Trends Microbiol. 5, 268–271. doi: 10.1016/S0966-842X(97)01054-8

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bolger-Munro, M., Cheung, K., Fang, A., and Wang, L. (2013). T4 bacteriophage average burst size varies with Escherichia coli B23 cell culture age. J. Exp. Microbiol. Immunol. 17, 115–119.

Google Scholar

Brüssow, H., and Kutter, E. (2005). “Phage ecology,” in Bacteriophages: Biology and Application, eds E. Kutter and A. Sulakvelidze (Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press), 129–164.

Google Scholar

Bull, J., Levin, B. R., DeRouin, T., Walker, N., and Bloch, C. A. (2002). Dynamics of success and failure in phage and antibiotic therapy in experimental infections. BMC Microbiol. 2:35. doi: 10.1186/1471-2180-2-35

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Camacho, C., Coulouris, G., Avagyan, V., Ma, N., Papadopoulos, J., Bealer, K., et al. (2009). BLAST+: architecture and applications. BMC Bioinform. 10:421. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-10-421

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Casjens, S. R., and Gilcrease, E. B. (2009). Determining DNA packaging strategy by analysis of the termini of the chromosomes in tailed-bacteriophage virions. Meth. Mol. Biol. 502, 91–111. doi: 10.1007/978-1-60327-565-1_7

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

d’Hérelle, F. (1917). Sur un microbe invisible antagoniste des bacilles dysentériques. C. R. Acad. Sci. Ser. D 165, 373–375.

Google Scholar

Drulis-Kawa, Z., Majkowska-Skrobek, G., Maciejewska, B., Delattre, A. S., and Lavigne, R. (2012). Learning from bacteriophages-advantages and limitations of phage and phage-encoded protein applications. Curr. Protein Pept. Sci. 3, 699–722. doi: 10.2174/138920312804871193

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Expert Round Table on Acceptance and Therapy Re-implementation of Bacteriophage (2016). Silk route to the acceptance and re-implementation of bacteriophage therapy. Biotechnol. J. 11, 595–600.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

Fokine, A., and Rossmann, M. G. (2014). Molecular architecture of tailed double-stranded DNA phages. Bacteriophage 4:e28281. doi: 10.104161/bact.28281

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hinkle, D. C. (1980). Evidence for direct involvement of T7 RNA polymerase bacteriophage DNA replication. J. Virol. 34, 136–141.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

Hooton, S. P., Timms, A. R., Rowsell, J., Wilson, R., and Connerton, I. F. (2011). Salmonella Typhimurium-specific bacteriophage WSH19 and the origins of species specificity in the Vi01-like phage family. Virol. J. 8:498. doi: 10.1186/1743-422X-8-498

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text

Hyman, P., and Abedon, S. T. (2009). Practical methods for determining phage growth parameters. Methods Mol. Biol. 501, 175–202. doi: 10.1007/978-1-60327-164-6_18

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Jann, K., and Jann, B. (1987). Polysaccharide antigens of E. coli. Rev. Infect. Dis. 9, S517–S526.

Joshi, N. A., and Fass, J. N. (2011). Sickle: A Sliding-Window, Adaptive, Quality-Based Trimming Tool for FastQ Files (Version 1.33) [Software]. Available:

Google Scholar

Kęsik-Szeloch, A., Drulis-Kawa, Z., Weber-Dąbrowska, B., Kassner, J., Majkowska-Skrobek, G., Augustyniak, D., et al. (2013). Characterizing the biology of novel lytic bacteriophages infecting multidrug resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae. J. Virol. 10:100.

Google Scholar

Kropinski, A. M., Prangishvili, D., and Lavigne, R. (2009). Position paper: the creation of a rational scheme for the nomenclature of viruses of Bacteria and Archaea. Environ. Microbiol. 11, 2775–2777. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2009.01970.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lavigne, R., Seto, D., Mahadevan, P., Ackermann, H. W., and Kropinski, A. M. (2008). Unifying classical and molecular taxonomic classification: analysis of the Podoviridae using BLASTP-based tools. Res. Microbiol. 159, 406–414. doi: 10.1016/j.resmic.2008.03.005

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Li, H., Handsaker, B., Wysoker, A., Fennell, T., Ruan, J., Homer, N., et al. (2009). 1000 genome project data processing subgroup. The sequence alignment/map (SAM) format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics 25, 2078–2079. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp352

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lunter, G., and Goodson, M. (2011). Stampy: a statistical algorithm for sensitive and fast mapping of Illumina sequence reads. Genome Res. 21, 936–939. doi: 10.1101/gr.111120.110

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Marchler-Bauer, A., Derbyshire, M. K., Gonzales, N. R., Lu, S., Chitsaz, F., Geer, L. Y., et al. (2015). CDD: NCBI’s conserved domain database. Nucleic Acids Res. 43, 222–226. doi: 10.1093/nar/gku1221

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Martin, M. (2011). Cutadapt removes adapter sequences from high-throughput sequencing reads. EMBnet J. 17, 10–12. doi: 10.14806/ej.17.1.200

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

McAllister, W. T., and Barrett, C. L. (1977). Hybridization mapping of restriction fragments from the early region of bacteriophage T7 DNA. Virology 82, 275–287. doi: 10.1016/0042-6822(77)90003-4

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Miles, A. A., Misra, S. S., and Irwin, J. O. (1938). The estimation of the bactericidal power of the blood. J. Hyg. 38, 732–749. doi: 10.1017/S002217240001158X

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Mushtaq, N., Redpath, M. B., Luzio, J. P., and Taylor, P. W. (2005). Treatment of experimental Escherichia coli infection with recombinant bacteriophage-derived capsule depolymerase. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 24, 160–165. doi: 10.1093/jac/dki177

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Nobrega, F. L., Costa, A. R., Kluskens, L. D., and Azeredo, J. (2015). Revisiting phage therapy: new applications for old resources. Trends Microbiol. 23, 185–191. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2015.01.006

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Price, M. N., Dehal, P. S., and Arkin, A. P. (2009). FastTree: computing large minimum evolution trees with profiles instead of a distance matrix. Mol. Biol. Evol. 26, 1641–1650. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msp077

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sambrook, J., and Russell, D. W. (2001). Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual, 3rd Edn. Cold Spring Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press,

Google Scholar

Seemann, T. (2014). Prokka: rapid prokaryotic genome annotation. Bioinformatics 30, 2068–2069. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu153

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Silver, R. P., and Vimr, E. R. (1990). “Polysialic acid capsule of E. coli K1,” in The Bacteria, Molecular Basis of Bacterial Pathogenesis, Vol. 11, eds B. Iglewski and V Miller (New York, NY: Academic Press, Inc), 39–60.

Google Scholar

Smith, H. W., and Huggins, M. B. (1980). The association of the 018, K1 and H7 antigens and the CoIV plasmid of a strain of Escherichia coli with its virulence and immunogenicity. J. Gen. Microbiol. 121, 387–400.

Google Scholar

Smith, H. W., and Huggins, M. B. (1982). Successful treatment of experimental Escherichia coli infections in mice using phage: its general superiority over antibiotics. J. Gen. Microbiol. 128, 307–318. doi: 10.1099/00221287-128-2-307

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Smith, H. W., and Huggins, M. B. (1983). Effectiveness of phages in treating experimental Escherichia coli diarrhoea in calves, piglets and lambs. J. Gen. Microbiol. 129, 2659–2675. doi: 10.1099/00221287-129-8-2659

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Smith, H. W., Huggins, M. B., and Shaw, K. M. (1987a). Factors influencing the survival and multiplication of bacteriophages in calves and in their environment. J. Gen. Microbiol. 133, 1127–1135.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

Smith, H. W., Huggins, M. B., and Shaw, K. M. (1987b). The control of experimental Escherichia coli diarrhoea in calves by means of bacteriophages. J. Gen. Microbiol. 133, 1111–1126.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

Sullivan, M. J., Petty, N. K., and Beatson, S. A. (2011). Easyfig:a genome comparison visualiser. Bioinformatics 27, 1009–1010. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr039

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Summers, W. C. (1999). Fe ìlix d’H ìerelle and the Origins of Molecular Biology. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

Summers, W. C. (2001). Bacteriophage therapy. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 55, 437–451. doi: 10.1146/annurev.micro.55.1.437

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Thompson, J. D., Higgins, D. G., and Gibson, T. J. (1994). CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res. 22, 4673–4680. doi: 10.1093/nar/22.22.4673

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Tomlinson, S., and Taylor, P. W. (1985). Neuraminidase associated with coliphage E that specifically depolymerizes the Escherichia coli K1 capsular polysaccharide. J. Virol. 55, 374–378.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

Tsonos, J., Oosterik, L. H., Tuntufye, H. N., Klumpp, J., Butaye, P., De Greve, H., et al. (2014). A cocktail of in vitro efficient phages is not a guarantee for in vivo therapeutic results against avian colibacillosis. Vet. Microbiol. 171, 470–479. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2013.10.021

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Twort, F. W. (1915). An investigation on the nature of the ultramicroscopic viruses. Lancet 186, 1241–1243. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(01)20383-3

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Verma, V., Harjai, K., and Chhibber, S. (2009). Characterization of a T7-like lytic bacteriophage of Klebsiella pneumoniae B5055: a potential therapeutic agent. Curr. Microbiol. 59, 274–281. doi: 10.1007/s00284-009-9430-y

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Weber-Dąbrowska, B., Jończyk-Matysiak, E., Żaczek, M., Łobocka, M., Łusiak-Szelachowska, M., Górski, A., et al. (2016). Bacteriophage procurement for therapeutic purposes. Front. Microbiol. 7:1177. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.01177

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yamamoto, K. R., Alberts, B. M., Benzinger, R., Lawhorne, L., and Treiber, G. (1970). Rapid bacteriophage sedimentation in the presence of polyethylene glycol and its application to large-scale virus purification. Virol. 40, 734–744. doi: 10.1016/0042-6822(70)90218-7

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhou, Y., Liang, Y., Lynch, K., Dennis, J. J., and Wishart, D. S. (2011). PHAST: a fast phage search tool. Nucl. Acids Res. 39, 347–352. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkr485

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: Escherichia coli, bacteriophage, therapeutics, one-step growth curve, transmission electron microscopy, phylogeny, DNA-dependent RNA polymerase

Citation: Baig A, Colom J, Barrow P, Schouler C, Moodley A, Lavigne R and Atterbury R (2017) Biology and Genomics of an Historic Therapeutic Escherichia coli Bacteriophage Collection. Front. Microbiol. 8:1652. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.01652

Received: 28 May 2017; Accepted: 15 August 2017;
Published: 30 August 2017.

Edited by:

William Michael McShan, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, United States

Reviewed by:

Scott Van Nguyen, Agricultural Research Service (USDA), United States
Ananda Shankar Bhattacharjee, Bigelow Laboratory for Ocean Sciences, United States

Copyright © 2017 Baig, Colom, Barrow, Schouler, Moodley, Lavigne and Atterbury. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Robert Atterbury, Abiyad Baig, Joan Colom,

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.