Abstract
Campylobacter is a leading foodborne pathogen worldwide. Biofilm formation is an important survival mechanism that sustains the viability of Campylobacter under harsh stress conditions. Iron affects biofilm formation in some other bacteria; however, the effect of iron on biofilm formation has not been investigated in Campylobacter. In this study, we discovered that ferrous (Fe2+) and ferric (Fe3+) iron stimulated biofilm formation in Campylobacter jejuni. The sequestration of iron with an iron chelator prevented the iron-mediated biofilm stimulation. The level of total reactive oxygen species (ROS) in biofilms was increased by iron. However, the supplementation with an antioxidant prevented the total ROS level from being increased in biofilms by iron and also inhibited iron-mediated biofilm stimulation in C. jejuni. This suggests that iron promotes biofilm formation through oxidative stress. Based on the results of fluorescence microscopic analysis, Fe2+ and Fe3+ enhanced both microcolony formation and biofilm maturation. The levels of extracellular DNA and polysaccharides in biofilms were increased by iron supplementation. The effect of iron on biofilm formation was also investigated with 70 C. jejuni isolates from raw chicken. Regardless of the inherent levels of biofilm formation, iron stimulated biofilm formation in all tested strains; however, there were strain variations in iron concentrations affecting biofilm formation. The biofilm formation of 92.9% (65 of 70) strains was enhanced by either 40 μM Fe2+ or 20 μM Fe3+ or both (the iron concentrations that enhanced biofilm formation in C. jejuni NCTC 11168), whereas different iron concentrations were required to promote biofilms in the rest of the strains. The findings in this study showed that Fe2+ and Fe3+ contributed to the stimulation of biofilm formation in C. jejuni through oxidative stress.
Introduction
Campylobacter is a leading bacterial cause of gastroenteritis and is responsible for approximately 166 million diarrheal cases and 37,600 deaths worldwide per year (). In addition to gastrointestinal infections, in some cases, Campylobacter jejuni may result in the development of Guillain–Barré syndrome (GBS), an acute flaccid paralysis (). Although C. jejuni is isolated from a wide range of domestic, companion, and wild animals (), poultry is considered as the most important reservoir for foodborne transmission of C. jejuni to humans (). Compared to other foodborne pathogens, such as Salmonella and pathogenic Escherichia coli, C. jejuni is physiologically unique (e.g., microaerophilic and asaccharolytic) and fastidious to culture (). Thus, specific culture conditions are required for the growth of C. jejuni. For example, low oxygen concentrations (e.g., 5% O2) and high growth temperatures (e.g., 37∼42°C) are needed for the optimal growth of C. jejuni (). As a capnophile, additionally, C. jejuni requires CO2, and carbonic anhydrase that is encoded by canB contributes to C. jejuni growth under low (such as 1%) CO2 conditions ().
A biofilm is microbial communities that are encased in a matrix of self-produced extracellular polymeric substance (EPS), including extracellular DNA (eDNA), polysaccharides, and proteins (). C. jejuni is capable of forming biofilms on various abiotic surfaces and frequently isolated from environmental samples (; ). Particularly, biofilm formation is deemed as an important survival mechanism in C. jejuni (; ). As bacteria are usually found in biofilms in natural settings (), Campylobacter is also found in biofilms on the surface of river rock and wood in the environment ().
Several environmental factors affecting biofilm formation in C. jejuni have been reported. The biofilm formation of this microaerophilic bacterium is enhanced under aerobic conditions (; ). Oxygen-rich conditions enhance the expression of membrane proteins, such as Peb4 and CadF, which are involved in the adhesion of C. jejuni to abiotic surfaces (; ). Increased oxidative stress under aerobic conditions is associated with biofilm stimulation in C. jejuni (). In addition, biofilm formation is also affected by nutritional factors. For instance, nutrient-rich culture media and high salt concentrations reduce biofilm formation in C. jejuni (). Iron is an essential nutrient required for all organisms () and is associated with biofilm formation in some bacteria, such as Streptococcus mutans (). Staphylococcus aureus (), and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (). Since iron affects various biological processes in C. jejuni, such as gene expression regulation (e.g., Fur regulon) and protein glycosylation (e.g., pglA, pglC, and pglH) (), we hypothesized that iron may be involved in biofilm formation in C. jejuni. To prove this hypothesis, in this study, we investigated the effect of ferrous (Fe2+) and ferric (Fe3+) iron on biofilm formation in C. jejuni NCTC 11168 and 70 C. jejuni strains isolated from raw chicken.
Results
Stimulation of Biofilm Formation by Iron
To examine the effect of iron on biofilm formation, biofilm assays were performed with minimal essential medium alpha (MEMα), which does not contain iron, with/without iron supplementation. Interestingly, biofilm formation in C. jejuni was significantly enhanced by iron (Figure 1). Although both Fe2+ and Fe3+ affected biofilm formation in C. jejuni, Fe2+ and Fe3+ stimulated biofilm formation at different concentration ranges (Figure 1). Although the averages of bacterial counts in biofilms were slightly reduced at iron concentrations ≥20 μM, the reduction was not statistically significant, and the viability of C. jejuni in biofilms was not altered at the iron concentrations tested in the study (Supplementary Figure S1A). These results showed that iron, both Fe2+ and Fe3+, enhanced biofilm formation in C. jejuni.
FIGURE 1
Inhibition of Iron-Mediated Biofilm Promotion by a Chelator and an Antioxidant
To confirm the effect of iron on biofilm stimulation, biofilm assays were performed in the supplementation with an iron chelator. The treatment of biofilms with an iron chelator significantly inhibited the iron-mediated enhancement of biofilm formation in C. jejuni (Figure 2A). While iron is an essential nutrient, it may generate reactive oxygen species (ROS) through the Fenton/Haber–Weiss reaction (). Since oxidative stress affects biofilm formation in C. jejuni (; ), we hypothesized that the iron-mediated biofilm promotion may be related to oxidative stress. To examine this hypothesis, we investigated the effect of antioxidant treatment on biofilm formation in the presence of iron. The levels of total ROS were increased by iron and reduced by an iron chelator and an antioxidant (Figure 2B). The intracellular levels of iron were increased by iron supplementation and reduced by an iron chelator (Figure 2C). Antioxidant treatment inhibited the iron-mediated promotion of biofilm formation, although the intracellular iron level of iron- and antioxidant-treated biofilms was comparable to that in the biofilms treated with only iron (Figure 2C). Interestingly, biofilm formation was enhanced in proportion to the level of total ROS (Figures 2A,B), not that of intracellular iron (Figures 2A,C). The viability of C. jejuni in biofilms was not affected by the treatment conditions used in the study (Supplementary Figure S1B). These results suggested that biofilm promotion by iron is associated with oxidative stress in C. jejuni.
FIGURE 2
Increased Production of EPS by Iron
The formation of biofilms was observed in the presence and absence of iron using fluorescence microscopy. Iron supplementation significantly enhanced the establishment of microcolonies at the early stage (12 h) of biofilm formation and also increased the development of matured biofilm structures at 24 h (Figure 3), suggesting that iron may affect the early and late stages of biofilm formation in C. jejuni. To observe EPS production, biofilms were stained with BOBO3 and calcofluor white (CW) to detect eDNA and extracellular polysaccharides, respectively. BOBO-3 is a DNA-binding red fluorescent dye and cannot penetrate through the membrane and thus is used to detect eDNA. CW is a fluorescent dye that binds to β1–3 and β1–4 carbohydrate linkages and has been used to detect polysaccharides in C. jejuni biofilms (). Both Fe2+ and Fe3+ substantially increased the production of eDNA and extracellular polysaccharides in biofilms; however, an iron chelator and an antioxidant reduced the levels of eDNA and extracellular polysaccharides (Figure 3). These findings demonstrated that iron promoted biofilm formation in C. jejuni by stimulating the production of eDNA and extracellular polysaccharides.
FIGURE 3
Effect of Iron on Biofilm Formation in 70 Strains of C. jejuni From Retail Raw Chicken
Using the iron concentrations determined with C. jejuni NCTC 11168 (40 μM Fe2+ and 20 μM Fe3+; Figure 1), the effect of iron on biofilm formation was evaluated in 70 C. jejuni strains that were isolated from retail raw chicken in our previous study (). The levels of biofilm formation in the tested strains varied significantly in the absence of iron, ranging from low (Figure 4A), medium (Figure 4B), to high levels (Figure 4C), and iron significantly stimulated biofilm formation in the tested strains with strain-dependent variations (Figure 4 and Supplementary Figure S2). Similar to C. jejuni NCTC 11168 (Figure 1), 51 (72.9%) of the 70 tested strains exhibited biofilm promotion by both 40 μM Fe2+ and 20 μM Fe3+ (Figure 5A). However, biofilm formation in 14 (20%) strains was enhanced by either only 40 μM Fe2+ or 20 μM Fe3+, not by both (Figure 5A), and biofilm formation in five strains (7.1%) was promoted by neither 40 μM Fe2+ nor 20 μM Fe3+ (Figure 5A). The intrinsic level of biofilm formation was not correlated to the multilocus sequence typing (MLST) clonal complexes (CCs) of the strains. Overall, MLST CCs 21 and 45 were distributed in weak-, medium-, and strong-biofilm formers; however, minor MLST CCs, such as 353, 354, and 362, were not found in strong-biofilm formers (Figure 5B).
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 5
Assuming strain variations in iron uptake and/or oxidative stress defense, we conducted biofilm assays at different iron concentrations with the 19 strains whose biofilm formation was not enhanced by either 40 μM Fe2+ or 20 μM Fe3+ or both (Figures 4, 5A). Interestingly, biofilm formation in all tested strains was enhanced by both Fe2+ and Fe3+ at different concentrations with substantial strain variations (Figure 6). These results show that most C. jejuni strains increased biofilm formation in similar concentration ranges (ca. 40 μM Fe2+ and 20 μM Fe3+). However, different iron concentrations were required for biofilm stimulation in some C. jejuni strains.
FIGURE 6
Discussion
As an essential nutrient, iron is involved in various biological processes in C. jejuni (). Fe2+ may diffuse through outer-membrane porins and then pass through FeoB in the cytoplasmic membrane in C. jejuni (; ). Fe3+ uptake is mediated by multiple membrane transporters, whose expression is regulated by the ferric uptake regulator Fur (). The findings in this study demonstrate that both Fe2+ and Fe3+ stimulate biofilm formation in C. jejuni. Effects of iron on biofilm formation have also been reported in other bacteria. Iron-depleted saliva increases aggregation and biofilm formation of S. mutans, an important pathogen causing dental caries (). Iron enhances biofilm formation in S. aureus ATCC 35556 and a few clinical strains of S. aureus (). However, the effect of iron on biofilm formation appears to be strain-dependent in S. aureus since iron reduces biofilm formation in S. aureus Newman (). Biofilm formation in most of the strains tested in this study was stimulated 40 μM Fe2+ and 20 μM Fe3+ (Figures 4, 5A), which were effective at biofilm promotion in C. jejuni NCTC 11168 (Figure 1). In some other C. jejuni strains, 40 μM Fe2+ and 20 μM Fe3+ did not enhance biofilm formation, and different iron concentrations were required to promote biofilm formation in these strains (Figure 6). Variations in the iron concentrations impacting biofilm formation may be associated with the strain variations in iron-associated genes in C. jejuni. Genes encoding iron transporters, which are found in the genome of some C. jejuni strains, have been found to be non-functional or absent in other strains (). Presumably, the diversities in the genes involved in iron uptake might be associated with the strain-dependent variations in iron concentrations affecting biofilm stimulation. We could not observe any correlation between the MLST CCs and the levels of biofilm formation (Figure 5B), presumably because the MLST scheme is based on the polymorphisms of the seven housekeeping genes (aspA, glnA, gltA, glyA, pgm, tkt, and uncA) (). However, biofilm formation is complicated and involves proteins of various biological processes, such as motility, chemotaxis, oxidative stress response, heat shock response, and energy generation (). This might be the reason why the MLST sequence types were not well correlated with biofilm formation in this study.
Biofilm formation in P. aeruginosa is inhibited by lactoferrin, a mammalian iron chelator (). The sequestration of iron by lactoferrin reduces the intracellular levels of iron and inhibits biofilm formation (). The anti-biofilm effect of lactoferrin in P. aeruginosa involves incessant twitching motility that affects bacterial attachment to a surface and microcolony formation during biofilm development (). Twitching motility is mediated by type IV pili (). Similarly, iron stimulates biofilm formation in E. coli by controlling the expression of type I fimbriae (). However, C. jejuni does not produce pili (). This indicates that a different mechanism may be involved in iron-mediated biofilm promotion in C. jejuni.
It has been reported that oxidative stress affects biofilm formation in C. jejuni (). A mutation of ahpC leads to the accumulation of total ROS and lipid hydroperoxides and enhances biofilm formation in C. jejuni, and antioxidant treatment inhibits the biofilm promotion by an ahpC mutation (). PerR and CosR, key oxidative stress defense regulators in C. jejuni, also consistently affect biofilm formation in C. jejuni (; ). Although C. jejuni is microaerophilic, interestingly, aerobic exposure facilitates biofilm formation in C. jejuni (). Our previous study has shown that oxidative stress plays a role in biofilm stimulation in C. jejuni under aerobic conditions (). Oxidative stress affects biofilm formation in some other bacteria. Biofilm formation in Mycobacterium avium increases by the autoinducer-2 (AI-2) signaling molecules by the induction of oxidative stress response involving the upregulation of genes encoding alkyl hydroperoxidases (e.g., ahpC and ahpD), not through quorum sensing (). An ahpC mutation in Acinetobacter oleivorans DR1 increases the accumulation of H2O2 in the cell, which enhances biofilm formation by the induction of exopolysaccharide production in biofilms (). In C. jejuni, iron supplementation increased the accumulation of total ROS (Figure 2B) and the production of eDNA and extracellular polysaccharides in C. jejuni biofilms (Figure 3). Aerobic exposure and iron supplementation commonly result in the increase in oxidative stress. Based on the findings of this study, biofilm stimulation by iron through oxidative stress in C. jejuni may involve EPS production (Figure 3). EPS constitutes over 90% of the dry mass of biofilms () and contributes to the nutrient acquisition and desiccation tolerance (). Similarly, biofilm stimulation by iron in S. aureus is mediated by the increased production of polysaccharide intercellular adhesin (i.e., β-1,6-linked N-acetyl glucosamine polymer) involved in biofilm formation (). Exposure to increased iron concentrations augments the accumulation of ROS in C. jejuni (Figure 2B) and the production of EPS in biofilms (Figure 3). Presumably, the enhanced production of EPS by iron may help C. jejuni to reduce exposure to oxygen and other stress conditions by facilitating the formation of biofilm matrices encasing C. jejuni.
Cationic metal ions can be toxic for planktonic bacterial cells at high concentrations; however, the absorption and accumulation of metal ions in biofilms stabilizes biofilms and prevents their erosion by shear forces in B. subtilis (). EDTA disrupts P. aeruginosa biofilms and enhances the dispersal of bacterial cells from biofilms (). However, Mg2+, Ca2+, and Fe2+ inhibit the effect of EDTA on biofilm disruption, suggesting that divalent cations are important components that stabilize biofilms in P. aeruginosa (). In addition to the effect of iron on oxidative stress, we cannot exclude the possibility that iron may also be involved in the stabilization of biofilm structure in C. jejuni. Future studies are required to elucidate the molecular mechanisms underlying the interplay between iron and oxidative stress in biofilm formation in C. jejuni.
Materials and Methods
Bacterial Strains and Culture Conditions
Campylobacter jejuni NCTC 11168, the first genome-sequenced strain, was primarily used in this study. Seventy strains of C. jejuni were isolated from raw chicken in our previous study (). The C. jejuni strains were routinely maintained at 37°C under microaerobic conditions (5% O2, 10% CO2, and 85% N2) on either Mueller-Hinton agar plates or MEMα (Gibco, #41061-029), which does not contain iron. The microaerobic conditions were generated using a cylinder containing the premixed gas.
Biofilm Assays
Biofilm assays were carried out according to a protocol described in our previous study using MEMα (). Briefly, bacterial suspension was prepared from an overnight culture and then diluted with fresh MEMα to an OD600 of 0.07 and placed into a 96-well plate (Corning, #3595) in the presence of iron (Fe2+ or Fe3+), iron chelator (Deferoxamine mesylate, DFMS), or antioxidant (N-acetyl-L-cysteine, NAC). After 24 h, biofilms were washed twice with PBS (pH 7.4) and stained with 1% crystal violet. The dye eluted with the elution buffer (10% acetic acid and 30% methanol) was measured with a plate reader (FLUOstar Omega; BMG Labtech, Germany) at 595 nm. For bacterial counting of biofilms, C. jejuni biofilm samples were washed twice with PBS and resuspended in fresh MH broth. The resuspended biofilm samples were serially diluted in MH broth and spread on MH agar for enumeration. The experiment was conducted with triplicate samples and independently repeated at least three times.
Measurement of Total ROS
The total ROS level in biofilms was determined with CM-H2DCFDA (Thermo Fisher, United States), a general oxidative stress indicator, according to our previous study (). Briefly, biofilms were washed twice with PBS and re-suspended in PBS (pH 7.4). After addition of 10 μM CM-H2DCFDA, fluorescence was measured with a fluorometer (FLUOstar Omega) at ex 485 nm/em 520 nm. The total ROS levels were normalized with the total protein amounts that were determined using a Bradford assay. The experiment was conducted with triplicate samples and independently repeated three times.
Fluorescence Microscopic Analysis of Biofilms
Biofilm formation was also analyzed with fluorescence microscopy. Biofilms were developed on a circle cover glass in a 24-well plate for 24 h at 37°C under microaerobic conditions. Biofilm samples were washed twice with PBS and fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 30 min at room temperature. The biofilms were then washed with PBS and stained with SYTO9, BOBO3, and CW to detect total (both intracellular and extracellular) DNA, intracellular DNA, and extracellular polysaccharides, respectively. CW binds β1–3 and β1–4 carbohydrate linkages and was previously used to detect extracellular polysaccharides in biofilms (). After washing, the biofilms were analyzed with a fluorescence microscope (Carl Zeiss, Axio Imager A1). The experiment was repeated three times.
Measurement of eDNA in Biofilms
The isolation of eDNA from biofilms was performed as described previously (). After washing twice with PBS, biofilms were harvested with 2% EDTA and incubated at 4°C for 3 h with shaking (250 rpm). An equal volume of 2% cetyltrimethyl ammonium bromide (CTAB) was added, and the suspension was incubated on ice for 1 h. After centrifugation at 10,000 ×g for 10 min, the pellet was re-suspended in TE buffer, and an equal volume of phenol: chloroform: isoamyl alcohol (25: 24: 1) solution was added. After centrifugation, the top phase of each sample was transferred to a new tube, and 2× volume of ice-cold ethanol and 1/10× volume of 3 M sodium acetate were added. After incubation at -20°C for 1 h, the pellets were washed twice with 70% ethanol. After dissolving with water, DNA concentrations were measured with a spectrophotometer and normalized with the amount of total proteins in biofilms that was determined with a Bradford assay. The experiment was conducted with triplicate samples and repeated three times.
Measurement of Intracellular Iron Levels
The intracellular iron concentration was measured as described previously with slight modifications (). Briefly, biofilms were washed twice with PBS and disrupted with a sonicator (BioRuptor Plus; Diagenode, United States). The biofilm samples were mixed with an iron-detection reagent (6.5 mM ferrozine, 6.5 mM neocuproine, 2.5 M ammonium acetate, and 1 M ascorbic acid) and incubated at room temperature for 30 min. The absorbance at 550 nm was measured with a plate reader (FLUOstar Omega). Intracellular iron levels were normalized with protein concentrations that were determined with a Bradford assay. The experiment was conducted with triplicate samples and independently repeated three times.
Statistical Analysis
The statistical analysis was performed with Student’s t-test in comparison with the control without iron treatment using GraphPad Prism 6 (GraphPad Software, La Jolla, CA, United States).
Statements
Author contributions
EO and BJ designed the project. EO and KA performed the experiments. EO and BJ data analysis. EO, KA, and BJ wrote the manuscript.
Funding
This study was supported by NSERC Discovery Grant (401843-2012-RGPIN) and the Canada Foundation for Innovation (CFI) to BJ.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. The reviewer GP and handling Editor declared their shared affiliation.
Supplementary material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2018.01204/full#supplementary-material
References
1
Al-HaideriH.WhiteM. A.KellyD. J. (2016). Major contribution of the type II beta carbonic anhydrase CanB (Cj0237) to the capnophilic growth phenotype of Campylobacter jejuni.Environ. Microbiol.18721–735. 10.1111/1462-2920.13092
2
AsakuraH. IYamasakiM.YamamotoS.IgimiS. (2007). Deletion of peb4 gene impairs cell adhesion and biofilm formation in Campylobacter jejuni.FEMS Microbiol. Lett.275278–285. 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2007.00893.x
3
BaninE.BradyK. M.GreenbergE. P. (2006). Chelator-induced dispersal and killing of Pseudomonas aeruginosa cells in a biofilm.Appl. Environ. Microbiol.722064–2069. 10.1128/AEM.72.3.2064-2069.2006
4
BaninE.VasilM. L.GreenbergE. P. (2005). Iron and Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm formation.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.10211076–11081. 10.1073/pnas.0504266102
5
BerluttiF.AjelloM.BossoP.MoreaC.PetruccaA.AntoniniG.et al (2004). Both lactoferrin and iron influence aggregation and biofilm formation in Streptococcus mutans.Biometals17271–278. 10.1023/B:BIOM.0000027704.53859.d3
6
BrandaS. S.VikS.FriedmanL.KolterR. (2005). Biofilms: the matrix revisited.Trends Microbiol.1320–26. 10.1016/j.tim.2004.11.006
7
BuswellC. M.HerlihyY. M.LawrenceL. M.McguigganJ. T.MarshP. D.KeevilC. W.et al (1998). Extended survival and persistence of Campylobacter spp. in water and aquatic biofilms and their detection by immunofluorescent-antibody and -rRNA staining.Appl. Environ. Microbiol.64733–741.
8
ChandrangsuP.RensingC.HelmannJ. D. (2017). Metal homeostasis and resistance in bacteria.Nat. Rev. Microbiol.15338–350. 10.1038/nrmicro.2017.15
9
CornelisP.WeiQ.AndrewsS. C.VinckxT. (2011). Iron homeostasis and management of oxidative stress response in bacteria.Metallomics3540–549. 10.1039/c1mt00022e
10
DavisL.DiRitaV. (2008). Growth and laboratory maintenance of Campylobacter jejuni.Curr. Protoc. Microbiol.Chapter 8:Unit 8A.1.1-8A.1.7. 10.1002/9780471729259.mc08a01s10
11
DingleK.CollesF.WareingD.UreR.FoxA.BoltonF.et al (2001). Multilocus sequence typing system for Campylobacter jejuni.J. Clin. Microbiol.3914–23. 10.1128/JCM.39.1.14-23.2001
12
FlemmingH. C.WingenderJ. (2010). The biofilm matrix.Nat. Rev. Microbiol.8623–633. 10.1038/nrmicro2415
13
FlemmingH. C.WingenderJ.SzewzykU.SteinbergP.RiceS. A.KjellebergS. (2016). Biofilms: an emergent form of bacterial life.Nat. Rev. Microbiol.14563–575. 10.1038/nrmicro.2016.94
14
GaynorE. C.GhoriN.FalkowS. (2001). Bile-induced ’pili’ in Campylobacter jejuni are bacteria-independent artifacts of the culture medium.Mol. Microbiol.391546–1549. 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2001.02341.x
15
GeierH.MostowyS.CangelosiG. A.BehrM. A.FordT. E. (2008). Autoinducer-2 triggers the oxidative stress response in Mycobacterium avium, leading to biofilm formation.Appl. Environ. Microbiol.741798–1804. 10.1128/AEM.02066-07
16
GrumbeinS.OpitzM.LielegO. (2014). Selected metal ions protect Bacillus subtilis biofilms from erosion.Metallomics61441–1450. 10.1039/c4mt00049h
17
HermansD.PasmansF.MessensW.MartelA.Van ImmerseelF.RasschaertG.et al (2012). Poultry as a host for the zoonotic pathogen Campylobacter jejuni.Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis.1289–98. 10.1089/vbz.2011.0676
18
HuangH.BrooksB. W.LowmanR.CarrilloC. D. (2015). Campylobacter species in animal, food, and environmental sources, and relevant testing programs in Canada.Can. J. Microbiol.61701–721. 10.1139/cjm-2014-0770
19
JangI. A.KimJ.ParkW. (2016). Endogenous hydrogen peroxide increases biofilm formation by inducing exopolysaccharide production in Acinetobacter oleivorans DR1.Sci. Rep.6:21121. 10.1038/srep21121
20
JohnsonM.CockayneA.WilliamsP. H.MorrisseyJ. A. (2005). Iron-responsive regulation of biofilm formation in Staphylococcus aureus involves fur-dependent and fur-independent mechanisms.J. Bacteriol.1878211–8215. 10.1128/JB.187.23.8211-8215.2005
21
JokinenC.EdgeT. A.HoS.KoningW.LaingC.MauroW.et al (2011). Molecular subtypes of Campylobacter spp., Salmonella enterica, and Escherichia coli O157:H7 isolated from faecal and surface water samples in the Oldman River watershed, Alberta, Canada.Water Res.451247–1257. 10.1016/j.watres.2010.10.001
22
KalmokoffM.LanthierP.TremblayT.-L.FossM.LauP. C.SandersG.et al (2006). Proteomic analysis of Campylobacter jejuni 11168 biofilms reveals a role for the motility complex in biofilm formation.J. Bacteriol.1884312–4320. 10.1128/JB.01975-05
23
KempR.LeatherbarrowA.WilliamsN.HartC.CloughH.TurnerJ.et al (2005). Prevalence and genetic diversity of Campylobacter spp. in environmental water samples from a 100-square-kilometer predominantly dairy farming area.Appl. Environ. Microbiol.711876–1882. 10.1128/AEM.71.4.1876-1882.2005
24
KimJ.-C.OhE.KimJ.JeonB. (2015). Regulation of oxidative stress resistance in Campylobacter jejuni, a microaerophilic foodborne pathogen.Front. Microbiol.6:751. 10.3389/fmicb.2015.00751
25
KirkM. D.PiresS. M.BlackR. E.CaipoM.CrumpJ. A.DevleesschauwerB.et al (2015). World Health Organization estimates of the global and regional disease burden of 22 foodborne bacterial, protozoal, and viral diseases, 2010: a data synthesis.PLoS Med.12:e1001921. 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001921
26
LinM. H.ShuJ. C.HuangH. Y.ChengY. C. (2012). Involvement of iron in biofilm formation by Staphylococcus aureus.PLoS One7:e34388. 10.1371/journal.pone.0034388
27
Maal-BaredR.BartlettK. H.BowieW. R.HallE. R. (2012). Campylobacter spp. distribution in biofilms on different surfaces in an agricultural watershed (Elk Creek, British Columbia): using biofilms to monitor for Campylobacter.Int. J. Hyg. Environ. Health215270–278. 10.1016/j.ijheh.2011.12.004
28
MattickJ. S. (2002). Type IV pili and twitching motility.Annu. Rev. Microbiol.56289–314. 10.1146/annurev.micro.56.012302.160938
29
McLennanM. K.RingoirD. D.FrirdichE.SvenssonS. L.WellsD. H.JarrellH.et al (2008). Campylobacter jejuni biofilms up-regulated in the absence of the stringent response utilize a calcofluor white-reactive polysaccharide.J. Bacteriol.1901097–1107. 10.1128/JB.00516-07
30
MillerC. E.WilliamsP. H.KetleyJ. M. (2009). Pumping iron: mechanisms for iron uptake by Campylobacter.Microbiology1553157–3165. 10.1099/mic.0.032425-0
31
MurphyC.CarrollC.JordanK. N. (2006). Environmental survival mechanisms of the foodborne pathogen Campylobacter jejuni.J. Appl. Microbiol.100623–632. 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2006.02903.x
32
NaikareH.PalyadaK.PancieraR.MarlowD.StintziA. (2006). Major role for FeoB in Campylobacter jejuni ferrous iron acquisition, gut colonization, and intracellular survival.Infect. Immun.745433–5444. 10.1128/IAI.00052-06
33
OhE.JeonB. (2014). Role of alkyl hydroperoxide reductase (AhpC) in the biofilm formation of Campylobacter jejuni.PLoS One9:e87312. 10.1371/journal.pone.0087312
34
OhE.KimJ. C.JeonB. (2016). Stimulation of biofilm formation by oxidative stress in Campylobacter jejuni under aerobic conditions.Virulence7846–851. 10.1080/21505594.2016.1197471
35
OhE.McmullenL.JeonB. (2015). High prevalence of hyper-aerotolerant Campylobacter jejuni in retail poultry with potential implication in human infection.Front. Microbiol.6:1263. 10.3389/fmicb.2015.01263
36
PalyadaK.ThreadgillD.StintziA. (2004). Iron acquisition and regulation in Campylobacter jejuni.J. Bacteriol.1864714–4729. 10.1128/JB.186.14.4714-4729.2004
37
ReeserR. J.MedlerR. T.BillingtonS. J.JostB. H.JoensL. A. (2007). Characterization of Campylobacter jejuni biofilms under defined growth conditions.Appl. Environ. Microbiol.731908–1913. 10.1128/AEM.00740-06
38
ReuterM.MallettA.PearsonB. M.Van VlietA. H. (2010). Biofilm formation by Campylobacter jejuni is increased under aerobic conditions.Appl. Environ. Microbiol.762122–2128. 10.1128/AEM.01878-09
39
RiemerJ.HoepkenH. H.CzerwinskaH.RobinsonS. R.DringenR. (2004). Colorimetric ferrozine-based assay for the quantitation of iron in cultured cells.Anal. Biochem.331370–375. 10.1016/j.ab.2004.03.049
40
SilvaJ.LeiteD.FernandesM.MenaC.GibbsP. A.TeixeiraP. (2011). Campylobacter spp. as a foodborne pathogen: a review.Front. Microbiol.2:200. 10.3389/fmicb.2011.00200
41
SinghP. K.ParsekM. R.GreenbergE. P.WelshM. J. (2002). A component of innate immunity prevents bacterial biofilm development.Nature417552–555. 10.1038/417552a
42
SulaemanS.HernouldM.SchaumannA.CoquetL.BollaJ. M.DéE.et al (2012). Enhanced adhesion of Campylobacter jejuni to abiotic surfaces is mediated by membrane proteins in oxygen-enriched conditions.PLoS One7:e46402. 10.1371/journal.pone.0046402
43
TuronovaH.BriandetR.RodriguesR.HernouldM.HayekN.StintziA.et al (2015). Biofilm spatial organization by the emerging pathogen Campylobacter jejuni: comparison between NCTC 11168 and 81-176 strains under microaerobic and oxygen-enriched conditions.Front. Microbiol.6:709. 10.3389/fmicb.2015.00709
44
WillisonH. J.JacobsB. C.Van DoornP. A. (2016). Guillain-Barre syndrome.Lancet388717–727. 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00339-1
45
WuJ.XiC. (2009). Evaluation of different methods for extracting extracellular DNA from the biofilm matrix.Appl. Environ. Microbiol.755390–5395. 10.1128/AEM.00400-09
46
WuY.OuttenF. W. (2009). IscR controls iron-dependent biofilm formation in Escherichia coli by regulating type I fimbria expression.J. Bacteriol.1911248–1257. 10.1128/JB.01086-08
Summary
Keywords
Campylobacter, biofilms, oxidative stress, iron, survival mechanisms
Citation
Oh E, Andrews KJ and Jeon B (2018) Enhanced Biofilm Formation by Ferrous and Ferric Iron Through Oxidative Stress in Campylobacter jejuni. Front. Microbiol. 9:1204. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.01204
Received
15 January 2018
Accepted
17 May 2018
Published
06 June 2018
Volume
9 - 2018
Edited by
Giovanna Suzzi, Università di Teramo, Italy
Reviewed by
Odile Tresse, INRA – Centre Angers-Nantes, France; Giorgia Perpetuini, Università di Teramo, Italy
Updates
Copyright
© 2018 Oh, Andrews and Jeon.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Byeonghwa Jeon, bjeon@ualberta.ca
This article was submitted to Food Microbiology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Microbiology
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.