Abstract
Persulfide dioxygenases (PDOs) are abundant in Bacteria and also crucial for H2S detoxification in mitochondria. One of the two pdo-genes of the acidophilic bacterium Acidithiobacillus caldus was expressed in Escherichia coli. The protein (AcPDO) had 0.77 ± 0.1 Fe/subunit and an average specific sulfite formation activity of 111.5 U/mg protein (Vmax) at 40°C and pH 7.5 with sulfur and GSH following Michaelis–Menten kinetics. KM for GSH and Kcat were 0.5 mM and 181 s−1, respectively. Glutathione persulfide (GSSH) as substrate gave a sigmoidal curve with a Vmax of 122.3 U/mg protein, a Kcat of 198 s−1 and a Hill coefficient of 2.3 ± 0.22 suggesting positive cooperativity. Gel permeation chromatography and non-denaturing gels showed mostly tetramers. The temperature optimum was 40–45°C, the melting point 63 ± 1.3°C in thermal unfolding experiments, whereas low activity was measurable up to 95°C. Site-directed mutagenesis showed that residues located in the predicted GSH/GSSH binding site and in the central hydrogen bond networks including the iron ligands are essential for activity. Among these, the R139A, D141A, and H171A variants were inactive concomitant to a decrease of their melting points by 3–8 K. Other variants were inactivated without significant melting point change. Two out of five cysteines are likewise essential, both of which lie presumably in close proximity at the surface of the protein (C87 and C224). MalPEG labeling experiments suggests that they form a disulfide bridge. The reducing agent Tris(2-carboxyethyl)phosphine was inhibitory besides N-ethylmaleimide and iodoacetamide suggesting an involvement of cysteines and the disulfide in catalysis and/or protein stabilization. Mass spectrometry revealed modification of C87, C137, and C224 by 305 mass units equivalent to GSH after incubation with GSSH and with GSH in case of the C87A and C224A variants. The results of this study suggest that disulfide formation between the two essential surface-exposed cysteines and Cys-S-glutathionylation serve as a protective mechanism against uncontrolled thiol oxidation and the associated loss of enzyme activity.
Introduction
Persulfide dioxygenases (PDOs) catalyze the oxidation of glutathione persulfide (GSSH) and higher homologs (GSSnH; n > 1) with sulfite and reduced glutathione (GSH) as products (; ; ). Due to the high reactivity of reduced glutathione with elemental sulfur in the enzyme assay (), PDOs were formerly classified as sulfur dioxygenases (SDO) because they produce sulfite from GSH-containing sulfur suspensions. SDO activities are known for a long time from chemolithotrophic sulfur-oxidizing bacteria of the genus (Acidi-) Thiobacillus, however, the protein was neither purified successfully nor the corresponding gene identified (; ,; ; ). More recently, it was found that the human ethylmalonic encephalopathy protein 1 (hETHE1) has SDO/PDO activity. hETHE1 plays an important role in mitochondrial sulfide detoxification together with sulfide:quinone oxidoreductase and rhodanese (sulfane sulfur transferase; ; ; ). Mutations in the ETHE1 gene are responsible for the hereditary and fatal autosomal recessive disorder ethylmalonic encephalopathy (, , ; ), which is characterized by high levels of thiosulfate and C3–C5 compounds like ethylmalonic acid in urine and body fluids (, ).
Triggered by the discovery of ETHE1 in human mitochondria, ETHE1-homologous proteins with PDO activity were recently identified from Ac. caldus (AcPDO), Ac. ferrooxidans and from several heterotrophic bacteria (; ; ), sometimes fused with a rhodanese domain (; ). The bacterial PDOs seem to be responsible for the SDO activity observed earlier (; ,; ; ).
X-ray structures of the human ETHE1 (PDB identifier 4CHL) and of ETHE1-like PDOs from Arabidopsis thaliana (2CGU) and several bacteria showed homodimeric or homotetrameric proteins with molecular masses of 25–30 kDa (or 40–45 kDa for the rhodanese fusion proteins; ; ; ; ). The active sites each contain a mononuclear non-heme iron center coordinated by two histidines and one aspartate together with three water molecules. The resulting octahedral coordination sphere is known as 2-His-1-carboxylate facial triad and is typical for over 100 different oxygenases (for a recent review, see ). The active site cavity comprises the GSH-binding residues, which position the substrate, so that the sulfur atom(s) bind to the iron displacing one or more of the water ligands as shown by the 3D structures of the PDOs from Pseudomonas putida (4YSL) and Paraburkholderia phytofirmans (PpPDO; 5VE5; ; ).
Persulfide dioxygenases are divided into three subfamilies, Type I–III (; ). The human ETHE1 (4CHL) and the Arabidopsis PDO (2GCU) group in Type I together with many bacterial PDOs including two AcPDOs, the PpPDO and the Myxococcus xanthus enzyme (MxPDO; 4YSB, Figure 1; ; ). The Type II PDO from Ps. putida is larger than Type I enzymes due to additional loops. The Type III enzyme from Staphylococcus aureus has a C-terminal rhodanese domain similar to the PpPDO but a different substrate specificity: bacillithiol and coenzyme A persulfides exceed GSSH and cysteine persulfide 10- to 20-fold in terms of their respective specificity constants (). They all belong to the metallo-β-lactamase (MBL) protein superfamily together with glyoxalase II (PFAM database PF00753).
FIGURE 1
Several of the amino acid residues, whose mutations cause ETHE in humans, are conserved among the PDOs. They are either part of the GSH binding pocket or the extended hydrogen bond network around the iron site. Some of the latter residues coordinate another metal ion in MBL and glyoxalase II, most of which contain dinuclear zinc in the active sites (
Some of the cysteine residues in PDOs seem to be important for catalysis and there is evidence that C247 of the hETHE1 is essential not only for enzyme activity but also for an inferred polysulfidation of other cysteine residues in the protein (
Here we describe biochemical properties of the bacterial AcPDO including enzyme kinetics, inhibition properties, and melting points. In two publications, the temperature and pH dependences and the kinetic constants of two different PDOs from Ac. caldus MTH-04 had been reported (GenBank locus tags A5904_0790 and A5904_0421;
Materials and Methods
Vector Construction and Heterologous Gene Expression
Acidithiobacillus caldus C-SH12 (DSM 9466;
For protein production, 500 ml cultures were grown in LB medium at 37°C in notched Erlenmeyer flasks with vigorous shaking after inoculation from a 20 ml overnight culture to an approximate OD600 of 0.05. Gene expression was induced at an OD600 between 0.6 and 0.8 by addition of 200 μg/l anhydrotetracycline (Iba, Göttingen, Germany) from a 0.2% [w/v] stock solution in dimethylformamide. Ferric citrate was added to 100 μM at the time of induction to ensure sufficient iron incorporation. The Fe(III)citrate stock solution each contained 100 mM citric acid and FeCl3. The cultures were incubated for 20 h after induction with vigorous shaking (180 rpm).
Modeling and Site-Directed Mutagenesis
3D models of the AcPDO were built using the Phyre2 and the I-Tasser servers (
Mutants of several codons were constructed using inverse PCR amplification of the pASK_AcPDO plasmid with the appropriate back-to-back mutagenesis primers containing the desired mutation (Supplementary Table S1;
Protein Purification
The cell pellet obtained by centrifugation was washed once in ≈50 vol (v/w) of 100 mM Tris/HCl buffer pH 8 with 150 mM NaCl (buffer W; Iba, Göttingen, Germany) and afterwards resuspended in 5 vol of the same buffer. Cells were disrupted by sonication for 10 min [Branson Sonifier 250, level 5, microtip (5 mm) and 100% duty cycle]. After a first centrifugation step (10,000 × g for 10 min), the soluble protein-containing supernatant was centrifuged in an ultracentrifuge (100,000 × g for 45 min). The supernatant was passed through a 0.22 μm syringe filter and applied to a 1 ml-Strep-Tactin XT Superflow column (Iba) connected to a peristaltic pump with a flow rate of ≈0.5 ml/min followed by 5 column volumes (CV) of buffer W at a flow rate of 1 ml/min. The protein was eluted from the column with a biotin-containing elution buffer (BXT) according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Iba). The column was regenerated with 2 CV of 10 mM NaOH followed by addition of 8 CV buffer W, both with a flow rate of 1 ml/min. Alternatively, standard 1 ml gravity-flow Streptactin columns were used with 2.5 mM desthiobiotin in buffer W and regeneration of the column with a 1 mM HABA in buffer W and 100 mM Tris base solution in water (no pH adjustment) followed by rinsing of the column with 5 CV of buffer W according to the manufacturer’s recommendations (Iba).
Biochemical Procedures and Gel Shift Assay
The protein concentration was determined with the Bradford method (
Cysteine modifications were analyzed using a gel shift assay after derivatization of the protein with MalPEG (methoxypolyethylene glycol maleimide; MW 5,000; Sigma-Aldrich). For this purpose, 0.5 mg/ml PDO in buffer W (pH 7.2) were incubated with 5 mM NEM for 30 min at 30°C and subsequently derivatized with 2.5 mM MalPEG under identical conditions. For derivatization under reducing conditions, 5 mM DTT was added after the NEM incubation step. After 30 min of incubation, DTT and excess NEM were removed using spin columns (Roti-Spin MINI-3, 3 MWCO; Roth) and three washing steps with buffer W (pH 7.2) and the protein was derivatized with MalPEG as described above. The reaction was finally stopped by addition of 0.3 vol. of non-reducing SDS loading buffer (60 mM Tris/HCl 6.8, 15% glycerol, 9% SDS, 0.075% bromophenol blue).
Thermal Unfolding
Differential scanning fluorimetry (DSF) displays the increase of tryptophane/tyrosine fluorescence upon temperature-dependent unfolding, traced in glass capillaries with a Prometheus NT.48 nanoDSF instrument (NanoTemper Technologies; Munich, Germany). The fluorescence ratio of 330/350 nm was recorded continuously during the experiment at a heating rate of 1°C/min. The melting points were calculated from the first derivative of the resulting melting curve. The protein concentration was 1 mg/ml in 100 mM Tris-HCl buffer (pH 8) containing 150 mM NaCl.
PDO Activity Assays
For PDO activity assays, the enzyme reaction buffer [70 mM Tris/HCl pH 7.5 unless specified otherwise; 0.1% Tween20, 2% (wt/vol) sulfur flower] was sonicated for 5 min for sulfur dispersal (Branson, level 10, macrotip and 100% duty cycle). Aliquots of 2 ml were transferred to reaction tubes and 1 mM reduced glutathione was added from a 50 mM stock solution (range: 0.2–7.5 mM). The enzyme reaction buffer was used without sulfur flower if GSSH was the substrate. The reaction mixture was preheated for 5 min to the assay temperature of 40°C in a thermomixer with vigorous shaking (800 rpm). Usually, final enzyme concentrations of 1–2.5 μg/ml were used. 250 μl of the reaction mixture were transferred to 50 μl of a fuchsine solution in a 1.5 ml reaction vial immediately after enzyme addition to stop the reaction and provide a starting point for enzyme kinetics [0.04% fuchsine (wt/vol) in 12.5% sulfuric acid;
The protein concentration was varied between 1 and 100 μg/ml for recording of the pH and temperature dependencies and for the measurement of mutagenized protein versions, depending on the expected activities under the given assay conditions. The optimal temperature of the AcPDO activity was determined at pH 7.5, the pH profile was recorded at 45°C in 70 mM Tris buffer, using the same assay and pH values adjusted with HCl.
Reconstitution of the variants of the putative histidine ligands of the iron atom (H57A, H57G, H113A, and H113G) was attempted with addition of 2.5–30 mM imidazole and 50 μM Fe(III)Cl3 to the enzyme reaction buffer and activity assays. The specific activities of the proteins were determined against a reagent blank as described above. Alternatively, 100 μg of purified PDO (H57G) was incubated at 4°C in a total volume of 1 ml with 50 μM Fe(III)Cl3, 50 μM DTT and 2.5 mM imidazole for 18–24 h followed by dialysis against enzyme assay buffer free of iron and imidazole followed by determination of the specific activities.
GSSH Synthesis and Quantification
Glutathione persulfide production was performed by two different methods, the first one as described previously with minor modifications (
Mass Spectrometry
Mass spectrometry of GSSH and the AcPDO holoprotein was performed at the MS unit of the Dept. of Chemistry (Technische Universität Darmstadt)2. For GSSH analysis, the mass spectrometer (Impact II, quadrupole-time-of-flight, Bruker Daltonik, Bremen, Germany) was equipped with an electrospray ion source operated in positive ion mode at 180°C source temperature. The capillary voltage was set to 3 kV with a nebulization pressure of 0.4 bar and a nitrogen stream at a flow rate of 4.0 l/min.
Holoprotein analysis was performed with electron spray ionization and MALDI-TOF MS directly from solution. 20 μg of freshly prepared AcPDO was incubated for 1 min in a final volume of 100 μl enzyme reaction buffer (1) as prepared, (2) with 1 mM GSH or (3) 1 mM GSSH prepared by the first method described above (GSSH synthesis and quantification). Prior to analysis, samples were applied to a C4 HPLC column with a solvent mixture of H2O containing 0.01% TFA for 3 min followed by a gradient to 100% acetonitrile containing 0.01% TFA. The mass spectrometer (Impact II, Bruker Daltonik) was equipped with an electrospray ion source operated in positive ion mode. The selected mass range was between 800 and 5,000 m/z. Nitrogen was used as carrier gas and the temperature was set to 220°C with a nebulization pressure of 1.8 bar, a flow rate of 8 l/min and a capillary voltage of 4.5 kV. MALDI-TOF MS of the holoenzyme was carried out with an Autoflex speed TOF/TOF spectrometer (Bruker, Daltonik) with a 2,5-Dihydroxyacetophenone (DHAP) matrix.
MALDI-TOF MS of tryptic peptide fragments was performed at the MS unit of the University of Hohenheim (Stuttgart, Germany)3 after sample preparation following two different protocols. For the first approach, 20 μg each of the AcPDO samples were incubated with 5 mM iodoacetamide (IAA; Sigma-Aldrich, Munich, Germany) for 45 min in the dark followed by separation by SDS-PAGE gel with and without DTT as a reductant in the SDS sample buffer. For control, as-isolated protein was separated and measured without IAA treatment. For the second approach, 10 μg each of the AcPDO samples was incubated for 1 min in enzyme reaction buffer with (1) 1 mM GSH, (2) 2% sulfur flower, (3) both, and (4) 1 mM GSSH prepared by the first method described above (GSSH synthesis and quantification). The reaction was stopped by addition of 15 mM N-ethylmaleimide (NEM; Serva, Heidelberg, Germany; 5 mM for assay mixtures without S0). The samples were separated by SDS-PAGE using the sample buffer without reductant. The gels were stained with colloidal Coomassie Blue, the AcPDO bands excised and sent to the MS facility for tryptic digestion and measurement. The mass spectra were evaluated using SCAFFOLD 4 (Proteome Software, Portland, OR, United States).
Inhibition Studies
Inhibition studies were performed with IAA and NEM. Different approaches were followed for testing inhibitory effects. First, IAA and NEM were directly added to the enzyme reaction mixture at the final concentration given in the Section “Results” in order to verify the results obtained by
The reduction of putative disulfide bonds was performed using Tris(2-carboxyethyl)phosphine (TCEP; Sigma-Aldrich, Munich, Germany) in an anaerobic glove box (Coy; <0.5 ppm O2) to prevent instantaneous re-oxidation. Purified enzyme (5 mg) was dialyzed to remove desthiobiotin from the elution buffer as outlined above and applied to a 1 ml-Strep-Tactin Superflow column matrix. 3 ml of 3 mM TCEP followed by 3 ml of 3 mM IAA or 2 mM NEM were applied to the column-bound protein and incubated for 10 min. Afterwards, the modified enzyme was washed and eluted using the standard elution buffer (IBA). The elution fractions were removed from the glove box and activity assays were immediately performed under air.
Protein Denaturation Experiments
Stock solutions of guanidinium chloride and urea were prepared in 150 mM Tris/HCl buffer, pH 8, and added to 1 mg/ml of purified enzyme to the final molarities given in the Section “Results.” After incubation at 25°C for 1 h, 200 μl of the mixtures were applied to a Superose 6 HR 10/30 gel permeation column equilibrated with the denaturant/buffer mixture used for enzyme denaturation. The column was developed with the same mixture at a flow rate of 0.5 ml/min.
Results
Enzyme Properties of the AcPDO
The pdo gene was amplified from Acidithiobacillus caldus C-SH12 DNA and ligated with the expression vector pASK75 (
The assay for PDO enzyme activity was derived from a similar one used to measure sulfur oxygenase reductase activity (
FIGURE 2

Temperature (A) and pH profiles (B) of the AcPDO with 0.2 mM GSH and 2% sulfur and various amounts of wild type AcPDO as appropriate (1–100 μg/ml). Error bars represent the standard deviation from triplicate measurements.
Table 1
| Ac. caldus strain | C-SH12 | MTH-04 | MTH-04 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Accession/locus tag | PRJEB24175 | A5904_0790 | A5904_0421 | |||
| Substrate | Co-substratea | Unit | ||||
| Specific activity | 1 mM GSH | 2% S0 | U/mg | 61.6 ± 3.5 | 2.34b | n.r.c |
| 1 mM GSSH | – | U/mg | 118 ± 10 | n.r. | 0.066 | |
| Vmax | 1 mM GSH | 2% S0 | U/mg | 111.5 | n.r. | n.r. |
| 1 mM GSSH | – | U/mg | 122.3 | n.r. | n.r. | |
| KM | GSH | 2% S0 | μM | ≈500 | n.r. | n.r. |
| GSSH | – | μM | Not applicabled | 298 ± 13 | 267 ± 31 | |
| Kcat | GSH | 2% S0 | s−1 | 181 | n.r. | n.r. |
| GSSH | – | s−1 | 198 | 48.1 | 5.4 | |
| Kcat/KM | GSH | 2% S0 | mM−1 s−1 | 361 | n.r. | n.r. |
| GSSH | – | – | Not applicabled | 161.4 | 20.2 | |
| Hill coefficient | GSSH | – | – | 2.3 ± 0.22 | n.r. | n.r. |
| Reference | This work | |||||
Comparison of the activity measurements and kinetic constants obtained of PDOs from Ac. caldus C-SH12 and MTH-04.
aBoth added in the enzyme assay mixture. b0.8 mM GSH; 1 U of activity had been defined as 1 nmol sulfite formed per min, not 1 μmol (
FIGURE 3

Enzyme kinetics of the AcPDO. (A) activity vs. substrate concentration plot for GSH plus sulfur and GSSH; Error bars represent the standard deviations from triplicate measurements. (B) Lineweaver–Burk plot for GSH plus sulfur; (C) Hill plot for GSSH.
The Michaelis–Menten plot of GSH in the presence of excess sulfur followed a saturation curve up to the highest measured concentration (7.5 mM; Figure 3A, shown up to 2 mM). This and the corresponding Lineweaver–Burk plot resulted in a KM value of ≈0.5 mM, a Vmax of 111.5 U/mg protein, a Kcat of 181 s−1 and a specificity constant Kcat/KM of 361 s−1 mM−1 per subunit (Figures 3A,B). In contrast, GSSH gave a sigmoidal curve with a Vmax of 122.3 U/mg protein at 1–1.5 mM GSSH suggesting positive cooperativity and a Kcat of 198 s−1. The Hill plot resulted in a straight line and the resulting Hill coefficient nH was 2.3 ± 0.22 (Figure 3C), suggesting the presence of more than two subunits in the active holoenzyme.
The major band in non-denaturing polyacrylamide gels of the AcPDO had an apparent molecular mass of 54 kDa presumably corresponding to the dimer. Higher oligomeric states were also visible presumably corresponding to the tetramer, octamer and decamer (apparent molecular masses: 111, 203, and 285 kDa; Figure 4A and Supplementary Figure S2B). Gel permeation chromatography (GPC) of freshly prepared AcPDO showed a major elution peak corresponding to an apparent mol. mass of 99.4 ± 1.5 kDa (n = 3; Figure 4B), equivalent to 3.7 subunits suggesting a tetrameric state in solution. A long slope toward lower retention volumes was visible suggesting the presence of higher oligomers as seen in the non-denaturing gels. This effect was enhanced when previously frozen protein preparations were used, which resulted in an additional shoulder in the chromatogram with an apparent mol. mass of ≈380 kDa (Figure 4C). GPC of guanidinium hydrochloride-treated AcPDO resulted in a step-wise increase in retention volumes with the concentration, which points to a disintegration into dimers at 2 M and into monomers at 3 M guanidinium (Figure 4C). In contrast, urea treatment of the AcPDO did not shift the dominant GPC peak toward higher retention volumes even in the presence of 8 M urea (Supplementary Figure S6A), however, the 380 kDa shoulder vanished from before-frozen PDO preparations. The 54-kDa dimer band was resistant against disintegration by urea. The monomer band started to appear only at 4 M urea and above, however, the dimer band remained the dominant species even at a urea concentration of 8 M (Supplementary Figure S6B). A peak with a retention volume of about 22.73 ml not showing bands in an SDS gel (not shown) appeared corresponding to a molecular mass ≈0.9 kDa suggesting low-molecular weight compounds were responsible. Taken together, the AcPDO seems to assume a tetrameric state in solution, which is resistant against denaturation with urea but not with guanidinium hydrochloride and SDS.
FIGURE 4

Native AcPDO and effects of denaturants. (A) Non-denaturing 4–16% polyacrylamide gel with different amounts of AcPDO; M, Native marker liquid mix for BN/CN (Serva, Heidelberg, Germany); (B) Gel permeation chromatography of freshly prepared AcPDO (0.5 mg protein) with marker proteins; (C) Gel permeation chromatography of previously frozen AcPDO (0.1 mg protein) in the presence of different concentrations of guanidinium hydrochloride.
MALDI-TOF mass spectrometries of the as-isolated AcPDO holoenzyme gave peaks centering at 27,067 mass units (MALDI-TOF; monomer; Supplementary Figure S7) and 54,148 mass units (dimer), whereas electrospray MS consistently gave 27,074 mass units, which almost fit the simulated spectrum (the calculated molecular weight is 27,077.39, average isotopic composition including Strep-tag). Minor peaks centering at 27,090 and 27,106 (Supplementary Figure S7) each differ by the value of one oxygen molecule suggesting different oxidation states. Similarly, the dimer had minor peaks ± 32–33 mass units (not shown).
Fe-Binding Residues
Mutagenesis of the codons for putative iron ligands H57, H113, and D130 (Figure 5A) to alanine resulted in inactive enzyme except for H57A, which retained 6% residual activity and ≈0.1 Fe/subunit (Figure 6A and Supplementary Table S2). H57G and H113G variants were completely inactive and did not have any iron bound. The activity could be partially restored by the addition of imidazole and iron to the activity assays of the H57A/G variants but not of the H113A/G variants (Figures 6B,C). However, the imidazole/Fe binding was not strong enough to withstand dialysis for 24 h against buffer W since the dialyzed protein preparations lost their activity (not shown). The replacement of the D130 ligand with Ala, Glu or His resulted in low but measurable residual activities of 0.5–2%. D130A and D130H had low iron content, whereas the Fe loading of the D130E variant fluctuated considerably in different preparations (Figure 6A).
FIGURE 5

Molecular representations of the AcPDO 3D model with glutathione from the PpPDO structure (5VE5). (A) Theoretical model of GSH in the AcPDO active site structure and predicted hydrogen bonds; boldface amino acid residues were mutagenized in this study. (B) C86 and C223 in the MxPDO 3D structure (gray) and in the AcPDO model (green). (C) Comparison of the secondary coordination sphere around D129/130 between the MxPDO (gray) and the AcPDO (green) originating from the S116 residue in the MxPDO.
FIGURE 6

Effects of site-directed mutagenesis in the AcPDO gene on the enzyme activity and iron content of the corresponding protein variants. (A) Variants of the iron ligands. (B) Reconstitution of the H57G variant with Fe and imidazole in the enzyme assay buffer. (C) Reconstitution of the H113G variant with Fe and increasing concentrations of imidazole. (D) Mutagenesis of substrate-binding site and hydrogen bond network. (E) Cysteine variants. Error bars represent the standard deviation from triplicate measurements.
Putative GSH-Binding Residues Around the Iron Site
A multiple sequence alignment of all PDO-like proteins with experimentally determined mononuclear iron in their active sites showed that the secondary structure elements could be overlaid reproducibly as observed earlier in a comparison of PDOs and glyoxalase II (
Among the other predicted GSH-binding residues, Y173A and K212A variants each retained ≈10% residual activity whereas the neighboring P211A variant retained 39%, suggesting that K212 rather than P211 is the interaction partner with GSH (Figures 5A, 6D and Supplementary Table S2). The experimentally seen interaction partner is the homologous residue K216 of the PpPDO (
Hydrogen Bonding Network
Secondary coordination sphere residues include the conserved T56 (Figure 1) predicted to form a hydrogen bond to Nδ of the iron ligand H57, and H171 predicted to form H-bonds to the Oδ2 atom of the iron ligand D130 and to T13 (Supplementary Figures S9C,D). The Nε atom of H171 is also hydrogen-bonded to the side chain of D61, which in turn forms an H-bond to H62 (Figures 5A,C). H59 – homologous to the hETHE1-H81 residue (
Cysteine Residues and Inhibition of the AcPDO
The multiple alignment (Figure 1) also showed that cysteine residues vary in numbers in the different PDOs and that they are not generally conserved, not even the essential C247/C235 of the human and Arabidopsis PDOs, respectively, which are present as cysteine sulfinic acid residues in the 3D structures (Figure 1;
Gel shift assays with the as-isolated and NEM-treated wild-type enzyme showed two monomer bands with apparent masses of 26–28 kDa in Coomassie-stained gels and after Western blotting with an α-Strep-tag antibody (Figure 7) beside the dimer band of ≈54 kDa. The smaller of the two monomer bands disappeared upon reduction with DTT and was also not visible with the C87A and C224A variants (Figure 7 and Supplementary Figures S1C–F), similar to SDS-gels with reducing sample buffer (Supplementary Figures S1A,B) suggesting that the non-reduced protein adopts two confirmations running differently in SDS gels. The smaller band was, however, visible in the non-reduced wild type enzyme after incubation with methoxypolyethylene glycol maleimide-5000 (MalPEG) but not in the variants indicating protection against PEGylation. Up to five bands with higher masses appeared differing by ≈10 kDa each and indicating that all 5 cysteines are at least partially accessible to PEGylation (Figure 7; the shift by 10 kDa is typical for MalPEG-5000-treated proteins in Tris-tricine gels;
FIGURE 7

Analysis of AcPDO using a MalPEG gel shift assay. (A) Coomassie-stained 10% Tris-tricine gel of the AcPDO wild type (10 μg/lane). (B) Western analysis using StrepMAP-Classic HRP-conjugated antibody. M, Marker in kiloDalton, NEM, sample derivatized with N-ethylmaleimide, DTT, sample reduced with dithiothreitol.
Among the other cysteines, the C117A variant had 12% residual activity, whereas the activities of the C137A and C180A variants were less affected (54 and 89%, respectively). C117 is replaced by a serine in the MxPDO, which is at the center of a network of H-bonds and water molecules around the histidine ligands presumably stabilizing the spatial arrangement of the iron site but not being actively involved in catalysis (Figure 5C). A C117S variant had 68% of wild type activity supporting this hypothesis (Figure 6E and Supplementary Table S2).
MALDI-TOF mass fingerprinting was performed of as-isolated AcPDO, sulfur- and GSSH-incubated and of the dithiothreitol-reduced protein with or without alkylation with iodoacetamide (IAA) or N-ethylmaleimide (NEM). Most cysteine-containing mass fragments were found as thiols, regardless of the oxidation state of the enzyme. Minor counts of cysteine dioxides and trioxides were identified and no direct evidence was found of cysteine persulfides (data not shown). In contrast, cysteine-GSH adducts were identified after the enzyme was incubated with GSSH. C87 contained high proportions of these adducts compared to NEM derivatization (>50%; Supplementary Figure S11). Lower counts were present at C224 and C137, however, C224 was represented in the mass spectra only by an incompletely digested octadecapeptide, whereas the fully digested tripeptide was below the detection range of the instrument. The C87A and C224A variants had the expected mass differences of the respective fragments (-32 mass units) whereas the remaining cysteine retained partial glutathionylation (Supplementary Figure S11). C117 and C180 showed no more than two glutathionylation signals in total (not shown) and were therefore considered inactive in this respect whereas intermediate counts and percentages (<40%) were recorded for C137, which also lies closed to the surface according to the structural model.
ESI MS of the wild type AcPDO holoenzyme resulted in major peaks of 27,074 and 27,091 mass units close to the expected sizes of the unmodified enzymes and to a single oxidation event (+16; Figure 8 and Supplementary Figure S7). A broad range of minor peaks is present at 27,390–27,420 mass units in the wild type. The difference is slightly higher than the mass of GSH (305 mass units) suggesting partial oxidation and/or the presence of attached sodium ions. A different pattern was observed with the C87A and C224A variants. The major peak of 27,046 mass units for the unmodified enzyme was shifted to 27,078/27,094 mass units in either case after incubation with GSH or GSSH suggesting either persulfuration or double/triple oxidation. In addition, the 27,398-9 peaks suggest glutathionylation due to the 305-mass-unit difference to the 27,094 peak. Only C224A incubated with GSH gave a more complex pattern with the major peak corresponding to a single-oxidized GSH adduct. Control measurements with TCEP-treated wild type enzyme could not be interpreted as they resulted in undefined fragmentation patterns of the whole protein (not shown). In conclusion, both the MALDI fingerprint and the whole-enzyme MS analysis and its cysteine variants gave evidence for covalent glutathionylation.
FIGURE 8

ESI mass spectra of the AcPDO wild type, the C87A and the C224A variants of the as-isolated proteins and after incubation with GSH and GSSH, respectively.
FIGURE 9

Effect of Inhibitors on the AcPDO. (A) Residual PDO activity with 1 mM GSH, sulfur and N-Ethylmaleimide (NEM) or iodoacetamide (IAA) after adding the substance directly to the enzyme assay mixture. (B) Same as in A only that the GSH concentration was varied. (C) Residual PDO activity after pre-incubation of the AcPDO with NEM, IAA, or Tris(2-carboxyethyl)phosphine (TCEP). Error bars represent the standard deviation from triplicate measurements.
In order to determine whether the redox state of the AcPDO is important for catalysis, the protein was reduced in an anaerobic glove box with Tris(2-carboxyethyl)phosphine (TCEP) and the reductant was removed by Strep-Tag affinity chromatography under anaerobic conditions. The residual activity was ≈25% compared to non-reduced protein when measured under standard aerobic conditions immediately after chromatography. When incubating the TCEP-reduced enzyme additionally with 2 mM NEM or 3 mM IAA, the residual activity was between 5 and 10% compared to the untreated and unreduced protein (Figure 9C).
Melting Points of AcPDO and Its Variants
Differential scanning fluorimetry (DSF) of the intrinsic tryptophane fluorescence showed a mean denaturation temperature of 63 ± 1.3°C at a heating rate of 1°C/min (n = 5 preps, each measured 3 times; Figure 10 and Supplementary Figure S12). The results of the temperature curve combined with the melting point suggest that the activity at temperatures higher than 65–70°C was detectable because of the short overall reaction time during the activity assay, so that the enzyme might be slow in its denaturation kinetics. The melting points of the enzymatically inactive D61A and H62A variants were similar to the wild type (Figure 10). In contrast, the low-activity variants R139A, D141A, and H171A had markedly reduced melting points of 60.7 ± 0.8°C, 55.7 ± 0.2°C, and 54.9 + 0.7°C, respectively, showing that the predicted salt bridge between R139 and D141 is important for stability as are the hydrogen bonds of H171. DSF of the two AcPDO C87A and C224A variants gave melting points of 63.3 ± 1.4°C and 63.3 ± 0.05°C, respectively (Figure 10), showing that the overall stability of the protein is not affected by these mutations.
FIGURE 10

First derivative plots of differential scanning fluorimetry (tryptophane/tyrosine fluorescence) of AcPDO variants (1 mg/ml) measured in 100 mM Tris buffer, pH 8.0, at a heating rate of 1 K/min and comparison with wild type.
Discussion
We report here an analysis of the biochemical properties of the ETHE1-like persulfide dioxygenase from the acidithermophilic bacterium Acidithiobacillus caldus C-SH12 (Topt = 45°C, pHopt = 2–2.5;
Biochemical characterization of the two MTH-04 PDOs showed that both use GSSH as substrate with a comparable KM but a Kcat differing ca. ninefold (Table 1;
The short reaction times of the enzyme assay might also explain the maximal temperature of activity being considerably higher than the melting point of the protein. We had observed a similar effect in a sulfur oxygenase reductase from the mesophilic bacterium Thioalkalivibrio paradoxus (TpSOR), with an optimal activity and a melting point each of 80°C and a temperature maximum of about 98°C (
The AcPDO Is a Homotetramer
The AcPDO seems to be homotetrameric in solution as evidenced both by non-denaturing gels and gel permeation chromatography (Figure 4 and Supplementary Figure S6) and resistant against denaturation with urea but not against guanidinium hydrochloride. The quaternary structure is consistent with the sigmoidal curve for GSSH in the Michaelis–Menten plot (Figure 3) and the Hill coefficient nH of 2.3 suggesting positive cooperativity. Since we found that GS(S)H binds to cysteine residues as well as to the iron site, the sigmoidal curve might also be a result of the substrate binding at two different places of the AcPDO (see below, C87 and C224 are essential residues). A similar sigmoidal dependency of activity on the GSSH concentration was observed measuring the O2-consumption rate in the PDO from the echiuran worm Urechis unicinctus, however, the enzyme was not analyzed with respect to cooperativity (see figure 9 in
Homology Model
The AcPDO had the highest similarity with the MxPDO (PDB accession 4YSB) so it was used to generate a homology model. Both proteins could be superimposed with little deviation (Supplementary Figure S8) and with the PDO domain of the PpPDO (5VE5). We transferred the coordinates of the GSH moiety of the PpPDO to the AcPDO model in order to analyze putative contact sites. The rhodanese domain of the PpPDO did not interfere with the access to the active site cleft of the PDO domain (
The problem, which of the residues of the AcPDO and other homologs are important for catalysis, breaks down to three partially interconnected issues: (i) the iron ligands, (ii) the secondary coordination sphere and the hydrogen bonding network, including the GSH/GSSH-binding site, and (iii) the role and importance of the cysteines.
Iron Ligands Are (Almost) Irreplaceable
It is obvious that the enzyme loses activity when the iron and its ligands are missing. The mononuclear iron-containing mono- or dioxygenases typically activate dioxygen by initial reduction to an iron-bound peroxide with varying oxidation states of the metal (
Central Residues in the H-Bond Network Are Crucial for Enzyme Activity
The GSH/GSSH-binding residues had received some attention in the literature pertaining the human ETHE1 since R163 (hETHE1 numbering; Figure 1) is a hotspot for variations with the propensity to cause disease (
The region between T56 and H62 forms a short amino acid motif (consensus T-H-hydrophobic-H-A-D-H-hydrophobic-T/S; Figure 1), which is conserved in Type I and Type II enzymes, while Type III enzymes have the third His replaced by a phenylalanine or tyrosine (Supplementary Sequences). This motif is slightly longer than defined by
T56 is a secondary coordination sphere residue, H57 an iron ligand, while D61 and H62 form an ionic pair that is connected to H171 (Figure 5A). H59 seems to stabilize the loop formed by these residues and was considered to be important for persulfide binding by
C87 and C224 Are Essential Residues
Cysteines are important for enzyme activity of the PDOs (
The MxPDO comprises only two cysteine residues, both lying in close vicinity at the surface of each subunit but not in disulfide bond distance (Figure 1;
Disulfides in proteins produced in the E. coli cytoplasm are not uncommon: Numerous proteins with intact disulfide can be found in the PDB or have been studied with other methods (e.g., thioredoxin, 3DIE,
C87, C224, and C137 were glutathionylated following the incubation of the enzyme with GSSH and, in the case of C87, also with GSH + S0 to a low degree (Supplementary Figure S11). ESI MS of the holoenzyme resulted in glutathione adducts predominantly of the C87A and C224A variants and to a lower degree in the wild type (Figure 8). Glutathionylation of either of the two disulfide-forming residues might be explained as the result of a thiol:disulfide exchange with GSSH. In contrast, glutathionylation of the free thiols in the C87A and C224A variants might be the result of other effects: (1) thiol:disulfide exchange with GSSH or (2) addition of GSH to a cysteine sulfenic acid residue (
The low activity of the C87A and C224A variants points to an important role in catalysis and/or protein stability.
Conclusion
The results presented here point to a high importance of the hydrogen-bonding network around the iron site for substrate binding and catalysis in the AcPDO. They also show, together with the results by
S-glutathionylation of surface-exposed cysteines was seen here independently with two different mass spectrometric methods. Combined with the likelihood of the disulfide bond, the question remains whether these results represent an artifact, an integral part of the reaction mechanism of the PDOs, a protective mechanism against thiol oxidation or a structural feature. The unchanged melting points of the C87A and C224A variants speak against the latter hypothesis. Only the active site pocket around the iron was so far shown to bind GSH (
Statements
Author contributions
PR constructed most of the mutants and conducted most of the experiments, analyzed the results, prepared almost all the figures, and wrote parts of the introduction and the experimental procedures. PH, DS, and JB each constructed some of the mutants and performed some of the activity assays. AK wrote most of the main text and conceived the idea for the project.
Funding
This work was supported in part by a Hubert-Markl-fellowship of the Carlo und Karin Giersch-Stiftung an der TU Darmstadt, Darmstadt, Germany, to PR.
Acknowledgments
We wish to acknowledge the contribution of Max Bernhardt, who constructed the original expression vector for pdo gene expression and Daniel Gleditzsch, who showed enzyme activity in E. coli for the first time during their respective Bachelor Theses, and to Renate Fröhlich, who grew the bacterium and prepared the DNA. We also wish to acknowledge the contribution of Christiane Rudolph of the mass spectrometry unit of the Department of Chemistry of The Technische Universität Darmstadt (Germany) and of Jens Pfannstiel of the mass spectrometry unit of the University of Hohenheim (Stuttgart, Germany).
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Supplementary material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2018.01610/full#supplementary-material
Footnotes
1.^https://www.dsmz.de/catalogues/details/culture/DSM-9466
2.^https://www.chemie.tu-darmstadt.de/massenspektrometrie/masse/service_1/auftrag.de.jsp
References
1
BradfordM. M. (1976). A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding.Anal. Biochem.72248–254.
2
CameronA. D.RidderströmM.OlinB.MannervikB. (1999). Crystal structure of human glyoxalase II and its complex with a glutathione thiolester substrate analogue.Structure71067–1078.
3
ChaeH. Z.OubrahimH.ParkJ. W.RheeS. G.ChockP. B. (2012). Protein glutathionylation in the regulation of peroxiredoxins: a family of thiol-specific peroxidases that function as antioxidants, molecular chaperones, and signal modulators.Antioxid. Redox Signal.16506–523. 10.1089/ars.2011.4260
4
Dalle-DonneI.RossiR.ColomboG.GiustariniD.MilzaniA. (2009). Protein S-glutathionylation: a regulatory device from bacteria to humans.Trends Biochem. Sci.3485–96. 10.1016/j.tibs.2008.11.002
5
DeLanoW. L. (2002). The PyMOL Molecular Graphics System.San Carlos, CA: DeLano Scientific.
6
Di MeoI.LampertiC.TirantiV. (2018). “Ethylmalonic encephalopathy,” inGeneReviews(R), edsAdamM. P.ArdingerH. H.PagonR. A.WallaceS. E.BeanL. J. H.StephensK.et al (Seattle, WA: University of Washington).
7
FischerD. S.PriceD. C. (1964). A simple serum iron method using the new sensitive chromogen tripyridyl-s-triazine.Clin. Chem.1021–31.
8
FloheL. (2013). The fairytale of the GSSG/GSH redox potential.Biochim. Biophys. Acta18303139–3142. 10.1016/j.bbagen.2012.10.020
9
Garcia-PinoA.Martinez-RodriguezS.WahniK.WynsL.LorisR.MessensJ. (2009). Coupling of domain swapping to kinetic stability in a thioredoxin mutant.J. Mol. Biol.3851590–1599. 10.1016/j.jmb.2008.11.040
10
GoldsteinF. (1950). The colorimetric determination of thiocyanate in whole blood.J. Biol. Chem.187523–527.
11
GorinG.EsfandiA.GuthrieG. B.Jr. (1975). Glutathione: its reaction with NADP and its oxidation–redution potenial.Arch. Biochem. Biophys.168450–454.
12
HallbergK. B.LindströmE. B. (1994). Characterization of Thiobacillus caldus sp. nov., a moderately thermophilc acidophile.Microbiology140(Pt 12), 3451–3456. 10.1099/13500872-140-12-3451
13
HemsleyA.ArnheimN.ToneyM. D.CortopassiG.GalasD. J. (1989). A simple method for site-directed mutagenesis using the polymerase chain reaction.Nucleic Acids Res.176545–6551.
14
HenriquesB. J.LucasT. G.RodriguesJ. V.FrederiksenJ. H.TeixeiraM. S.TirantiV.et al (2014). Ethylmalonic encephalopathy ETHE1 R163W/R163Q mutations alter protein stability and redox properties of the iron centre.PLoS One9:e107157. 10.1371/journal.pone.0107157
15
HildebrandtT. M.GrieshaberM. K. (2008). Three enzymatic activities catalyze the oxidation of sulfide to thiosulfate in mammalian and invertebrate mitochondria.FEBS J.2753352–3361. 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2008.06482.x
16
JanoschC.RemonsellezF.SandW.VeraM. (2015). Sulfur oxygenase reductase (Sor) in the moderately thermoacidophilic leaching bacteria: studies in Sulfobacillus thermosulfidooxidans and Acidithiobacillus caldus.Microorganisms3707–724. 10.3390/microorganisms3040707
17
JanoschC.ThyssenC.VeraM. A.BonnefoyV.RohwerderT.SandW. (2009). Sulfur oxygenase reductase in different Acidithiobacillus caldus-like strains.Adv. Mater. Res.71–73, 239–243.
18
JungM.KasamatsuS.MatsunagaT.AkashiS.OnoK.NishimuraA.et al (2016). Protein polysulfidation-dependent persulfide dioxygenase activity of ethylmalonic encephalopathy protein 1.Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.480180–186. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2016.10.022
19
KabilO.BanerjeeR. (2012). Characterization of patient mutations in human persulfide dioxygenase (ETHE1) involved in H2S catabolism.J. Biol. Chem.28744561–44567. 10.1074/jbc.M112.407411
20
KabilO.BanerjeeR. (2014). Enzymology of H2S biogenesis, decay and signaling.Antioxid. Redox Signal.20770–782. 10.1089/ars.2013.5339
21
KalS.QueL. (2017). Dioxygen activation by nonheme iron enzymes with the 2-His-1-carboxylate facial triad that generate high-valent oxoiron oxidants.J. Biol. Inorg. Chem.22339–365. 10.1007/s00775-016-1431-2
22
KelleyL. A.MezulisS.YatesC. M.WassM. N.SternbergM. J. (2015). The phyre2 web portal for protein modeling, prediction and analysis.Nat. Protoc.10845–858. 10.1038/nprot.2015.053
23
KletzinA. (1989). Coupled enzymatic production of sulfite, thiosulfate, and hydrogen sulfide from sulfur: purification and properties of a sulfur oxygenase reductase from the facultatively anaerobic archaebacterium Desulfurolobus ambivalens.J. Bacteriol.1711638–1643.
24
LinB. B.MaG. C.LiuY. J. (2016). Mechanism of the glutathione persulfide oxidation process catalyzed by ethylmalonic encephalopathy protein 1.ACS Catal.67010–7020. 10.1021/acscatal.6b01417
25
LiuH.XinY.XunL. (2014). Distribution, diversity, and activities of sulfur dioxygenases in heterotrophic bacteria.Appl. Environ. Microbiol.801799–1806. 10.1128/AEM.03281-13
26
LoiV. V.RossiusM.AntelmannH. (2015). Redox regulation by reversible protein S-thiolation in bacteria.Front. Microbiol.6:187. 10.3389/fmicb.2015.00187
27
MaillouxR. J.WillmoreW. G. (2014). S-glutathionylation reactions in mitochondrial function and disease.Front. Cell Dev. Biol.2:68. 10.3389/fcell.2014.00068
28
McCoyJ. G.BaileyL. J.BittoE.BingmanC. A.AcetiD. J.FoxB. G.et al (2006a). Structure and mechanism of mouse cysteine dioxygenase.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.1033084–3089. 10.1073/pnas.0509262103
29
McCoyJ. G.BingmanC. A.BittoE.HoldorfM. M.MakaroffC. A.PhillipsG. N.Jr. (2006b). Structure of an ETHE1-like protein from Arabidopsis thaliana.Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr.62964–970. 10.1107/S0907444906020592
30
MeiniM. R.LlarrullL. I.VilaA. J. (2015). Overcoming differences: the catalytic mechanism of metallo-beta-lactamases.FEBS Lett.5893419–3432. 10.1016/j.febslet.2015.08.015
31
MercatelliE.BarbieriL.LuchinatE.BanciL. (2016). Direct structural evidence of protein redox regulation obtained by in-cell NMR.Biochim. Biophys. Acta1863198–204. 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2015.11.009
32
MotlN.SkibaM. A.KabilO.SmithJ. L.BanerjeeR. (2017). Structural and biochemical analyses indicate that a bacterial persulfide dioxygenase-rhodanese fusion protein functions in sulfur assimilation.J. Biol. Chem.29214026–14038. 10.1074/jbc.M117.790170
33
PengL.XuX.GuoM.YanX.WangS.GaoS.et al (2013). Effects of metal ions and disulfide bonds on the activity of phosphodiesterase from Trimeresurus stejnegeri venom.Metallomics5920–927. 10.1039/c3mt00031a
34
PettinatiI.BremJ.McdonoughM. A.SchofieldC. J. (2015). Crystal structure of human persulfide dioxygenase: structural basis of ethylmalonic encephalopathy.Hum. Mol. Genet.242458–2469. 10.1093/hmg/ddv007
35
PuM.XuZ.PengY.HouY.LiuD.WangY.et al (2017). Protein crystal quality oriented disulfide bond engineering.Protein Cell9659–663. 10.1007/s13238-017-0482-7
36
PullelaP. K.ChikuT.CarvanM. J. IIISemD. S. (2006). Fluorescence-based detection of thiols in vitro and in vivo using dithiol probes.Anal. Biochem.352265–273. 10.1016/j.ab.2006.01.047
37
RethmeierJ.RabensteinA.LangerM.FischerU. (1997). Detection of traces of oxidized and reduced sulfur compunds in small samples by combination of different high-performance liquid chromatography methods.J. Chromatogr.760295–302.
38
RohwerderT.SandW. (2003). The sulfane sulfur of persulfides is the actual substrate of the sulfur-oxidizing enzymes from Acidithiobacillus and Acidiphilium spp.Microbiology1491699–1710.
39
RoyA. B.TrudingerP. A. (eds) (1970). “The chemistry of some sulphur compounds,” in The Biochemistry of Inorganic Compounds of Sulphur (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 7–29.
40
RühlP.KletzinA. (2017). The sulfur oxygenase reductase activity assay: catalyzing a reaction with elemental sulfur as substrate at high temperatures.Bio Protoc.7:e2403. 10.21769/BioProtoc.2403
41
RühlP.PöllU.BraunJ.KlinglA.KletzinA. (2017). A sulfur oxygenase from the haloalkaliphilic bacterium Thioalkalivibrio paradoxus with atypically low reductase activity.J. Bacteriol.199:e00675-16. 10.1128/JB.00675-16
42
SattlerS. A.WangX.LewisK. M.DehanP. J.ParkC. M.XinY.et al (2015). Characterizations of two bacterial persulfide dioxygenases of the metallo-beta-lactamase superfamily.J. Biol. Chem.29018914–18923. 10.1074/jbc.M115.652537
43
SawanaA.AdeoluM.GuptaR. S. (2014). Molecular signatures and phylogenomic analysis of the genus Burkholderia: proposal for division of this genus into the emended genus Burkholderia containing pathogenic organisms and a new genus Paraburkholderia gen. nov. harboring environmental species.Front. Genet.5:429. 10.3389/fgene.2014.00429
44
SchäggerH.von JagowG. (1987). Tricine-sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis for the separation of proteins in the range from 1 to 100 kDa.Anal. Biochem.166368–379.
45
ShenJ.KeithlyM. E.ArmstrongR. N.HigginsK. A.EdmondsK. A.GiedrocD. P. (2015). Staphylococcus aureus CstB is a novel multidomain persulfide dioxygenase-sulfurtransferase involved in hydrogen sulfide detoxification.Biochemistry544542–4554. 10.1021/acs.biochem.5b00584
46
SimmonsC. R.LiuQ.HuangQ.HaoQ.BegleyT. P.KarplusP. A.et al (2006). Crystal structure of mammalian cysteine dioxygenase. A novel mononuclear iron center for cysteine thiol oxidation.J. Biol. Chem.28118723–18733. 10.1074/jbc.M601555200
47
SkerraA. (1994). Use of the tetracycline promoter for the tightly regulated production of a murine antibody fragment in Escherichia coli.Gene151131–135.
48
SluiterE. (1930). The production of hydrogen sulphide by animal tissues.Biochem. J.24549–563.
49
SuzukiI. (1965a). Incorporation of atmospheric oxygen-18 into thiosulfate by the sulfur-oxidizing enzyme of Thiobacillus thiooxidans.Biochim. Biophys. Acta11097–101.
50
SuzukiI. (1965b). Oxidation of elemental sulfur by an enzyme system of Thiobacillus thiooxidans.Biochim. Biophys. Acta104359–371.
51
SuzukiI.SilverM. (1966). The initial product and properties of the sulfur-oxidizing enzyme of thiobacilli.Biochim. Biophys. Acta12722–33.
52
SuzukiI.WerkmanC. H. (1959). Glutathione and sulfur oxidation by Thiobacillus thiooxidans.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.45239–244. 10.1073/pnas.45.2.239
53
TirantiV.BriemE.LamanteaE.MineriR.PapaleoE.De GioiaL.et al (2006). ETHE1 mutations are specific to ethylmalonic encephalopathy.J. Med. Genet.43340–346. 10.1136/jmg.2005.036210
54
TirantiV.D’adamoP.BriemE.FerrariG.MineriR.LamanteaE.et al (2004). Ethylmalonic encephalopathy is caused by mutations in ETHE1, a gene encoding a mitochondrial matrix protein.Am. J. Hum. Genet.74239–252. 10.1086/381653
55
TirantiV.ViscomiC.HildebrandtT.Di MeoI.MineriR.TiveronC.et al (2009). Loss of ETHE1, a mitochondrial dioxygenase, causes fatal sulfide toxicity in ethylmalonic encephalopathy.Nat. Med.15200–205. 10.1038/nm.1907
56
TooheyJ. I. (2011). Sulfur signaling: is the agent sulfide or sulfane?Anal. Biochem.4131–7. 10.1016/j.ab.2011.01.044
57
UrichT.BandeirasT. M.LealS. S.RachelR.AlbrechtT.ZimmermannP.et al (2004). The sulphur oxygenase reductase from Acidianus ambivalens is a multimeric protein containing a low-potential mononuclear non-haem iron centre.Biochem. J.381137–146.
58
UrichT.GomesC. M.KletzinA.FrazaoC. (2006). X-ray structure of a self-compartmentalizing sulfur cycle metalloenzyme.Science311996–1000.
59
VenceslauS. S.CortJ. R.BakerE. S.ChuR. K.RobinsonE. W.DahlC.et al (2013). Redox states of Desulfovibrio vulgaris DsrC, a key protein in dissimilatory sulfite reduction.Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.441732–736. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2013.10.116
60
VisserJ. M.RobertsonL. A.Van VerseveldH. W.KuenenJ. G. (1997). Sulfur production by obligately chemolithoautotrophic Thiobacillus species.Appl. Environ. Microbiol.632300–2305.
61
WangH.LiuS.LiuX.LiX.WenQ.LinJ. (2014). Identification and characterization of an ETHE1-like sulfur dioxygenase in extremely Acidophilic Acidithiobacillus spp.Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol.987511–7522. 10.1007/s00253-014-5830-4
62
WeinerM. P.CostaG. L.SchoettlinW.ClineJ.MathurE.BauerJ. C. (1994). Site-directed mutagenesis of double-stranded DNA by the polymerase chain reaction.Gene151119–123.
63
WinterbournC. C. (2015). Are free radicals involved in thiol-based redox signaling?Free Radic. Biol. Med.80164–170. 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2014.08.017
64
WoodA. P.KellyD. P.NorrisP. R. (1987). Autotrophic growth of 4 Sulfolobus strains on tetrathionate and the effect of organic nutrients.Arch. Microbiol.146382–389.
65
WuW.PangX.LinJ.LiuX.WangR.LinJ.et al (2017). Discovery of a new subgroup of sulfur dioxygenases and characterization of sulfur dioxygenases in the sulfur metabolic network of Acidithiobacillus caldus.PLoS One12:e0183668. 10.1371/journal.pone.0183668
66
XiaY.LuC.HouN.XinY.LiuJ.LiuH.et al (2017). Sulfide production and oxidation by heterotrophic bacteria under aerobic conditions.ISME J.112754–2766. 10.1038/ismej.2017.125
67
YangJ.YanR.RoyA.XuD.PoissonJ.ZhangY. (2015). The I-TASSER Suite: protein structure and function prediction.Nat. Methods127–8. 10.1038/nmeth.3213
68
ZhangL.LiuX.LiuJ.ZhangZ. (2013). Characteristics and function of sulfur dioxygenase in Echiuran worm Urechis unicinctus.PLoS One8:e81885. 10.1371/journal.pone.0081885
69
ZhangW.ZhengW.MaoM.YangY. (2014). Highly efficient folding of multi-disulfide proteins in superoxidizing Escherichia coli cytoplasm.Biotechnol. Bioeng.1112520–2527. 10.1002/bit.25309
Summary
Keywords
persulfide dioxygenase, sulfhydryl, sulfur, enzyme kinetics, differential scanning fluorimetry, ETHE1, glutathione persulfide, S-glutathionylation
Citation
Rühl P, Haas P, Seipel D, Becker J and Kletzin A (2018) Persulfide Dioxygenase From Acidithiobacillus caldus: Variable Roles of Cysteine Residues and Hydrogen Bond Networks of the Active Site. Front. Microbiol. 9:1610. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.01610
Received
05 October 2017
Accepted
27 June 2018
Published
20 July 2018
Volume
9 - 2018
Edited by
Christiane Dahl, Universität Bonn, Germany
Reviewed by
Biswarup Mukhopadhyay, Virginia Tech, United States; Luyng Xun, Washington State University, United States
Updates

Check for updates
Copyright
© 2018 Rühl, Haas, Seipel, Becker and Kletzin.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Arnulf Kletzin, kletzin@bio.tu-darmstadt.de
This article was submitted to Microbial Physiology and Metabolism, a section of the journal Frontiers in Microbiology
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.