Population Genomics of an Obligately Halophilic Basidiomycete Wallemia ichthyophaga

Abstract

Background:

Wallemia ichthyophaga is a highly specialized basidiomycetous fungus. It is one of the most halophilic fungi ever described, only able to grow at low water activity. This specialization is thought to explain why it is only rarely isolated from nature.

Results:

Genomes of 21 W. ichthyophaga strains were sequenced with PE150 reads on BGISEQ500 platform. The genomes shared high similarity with the reference genome of the species, they were all smaller than 10 Mbp and had a low number of predicted genes. Groups of strains isolated in the same location encompassed clones as well as very divergent strains. There was little concordance between phylogenies of predicted genes. Linkage disequilibrium of pairs of polymorphic loci decayed relatively quickly as a function of distance between the loci (LD decay distance 1270 bp). For the first time a putative mating-type locus was identified in the genomes of W. ichthyophaga.

Conclusion:

Based on the comparison of W. ichthyophaga genomes it appears that some phylogenetic lineages of the species can persist in the same location over at least several years. Apart from this, the differences between the strains do not reflect the isolation habitat or geographic location. Together with results supporting the existence of (sexual) recombination in W. ichthyophaga, the presented results indicate that strains of W. ichthyophaga can form a single recombining population even between different habitats and over large geographical distances.

Introduction

Microbiological research of hypersaline environments has traditionally focused on prokaryotes and the alga Dunaliella salina (Zajc et al., 2017). Although halotolerant fungi were long known as contaminants of salted food (Pitt and Hocking, 1977), their presence in nature was not systematically investigated until the end of the 20^th century. In the last two decades it has become clear that certain fungal species form an integral part of microbial communities in different hypersaline environments around the world (Zajc et al., 2017). Even though these species grow at salinities exceeding 2.9M NaCl, most of them also grow in normal microbiological media with no added salt (i.e., they are halotolerant and not halophilic), unlike many prokaryotes from hypersaline environments, which are typically halophilic (Gostinčar et al., 2015). One of only a handful of true fungal halophiles is Wallemia ichthyophaga, one of the most extremotolerant fungal species with regard to low water activity and especially high concentrations of NaCl and other salts.

Wallemia ichthyophaga has been described in 2005 as part of a taxonomic revision of the Wallemia sebi species complex (Zalar et al., 2005). In addition to being phylogenetically and morphologically distinct from other species of the genus, the new species W. ichthyophaga differed from W. sebi in its requirement for low water activity, being unable to grow without the addition of solutes to the medium, preferably NaCl, with the lower growth limit at around 1.5M NaCl (Zalar et al., 2005; Kralj Kunčič et al., 2010) and optimum between 2.6 and 3.4M NaCl (Zajc et al., 2014b). W. ichthyophaga is one of the rare fungal species that strongly prefer high concentrations of ionic (e.g., salt) over non-ionic (e.g., sugar) solutes (Zajc et al., 2014b). In addition to this, it is able to grow in saturated NaCl, KCl, and MgSO₄ solutions and even at around 2M MgCl₂ (Zajc et al., 2014a), explaining its isolation from bittern, residual magnesium rich water left after commercial harvesting of the (predominantly NaCl) salt from the evaporation of sea water (Jančič et al., 2016).

Ecology of W. ichthyophaga is not well-understood due to only sporadic isolation from nature. A small number of strains have been isolated from sea water concentrated by evaporation in man-made outdoor pools for the purpose of harvesting salt and related habitats, and from salted food (Jančič et al., 2015). A second group of strains have been isolated from the air in two barns with horses and hay. Barns were identified as a rich source of other Wallemia spp. (Jančič et al., 2016), but the recovery of W. ichthyophaga from this environment was unexpected and occurred at only two of several sampled locations.

The small number of known isolates can partially be ascribed to their slow growth and requirement for media with very low water activity. Growth media with extremely high salinities (such as 15 to 20% NaCl) and prolonged incubation (at least 14 days) have been recommended for the successful isolation of W. ichthyophaga strains from nature (Zajc et al., 2014b). However, even a focused sampling of more than 300 low-water-activity substrates and using appropriate selective media yielded only a handful of new isolates (Jančič et al., 2016). It has thus been suggested that the rarity of isolation of W. ichthyophaga may simply reflect its low abundance in nature, which in turn is a consequence of the extreme specialization and low adaptability of the species (Gostinčar et al., 2010).

Genome sequencing of W. ichthyophaga in 2013 uncovered an unusually compact genome (9.6 Mbp) with a low number of predicted protein coding genes (4884) and high gene density – the genes occupied almost three quarters of the genome. The average genome size in Basidiomycota is 46.48 Mbp and an average genome contains more than 15000 genes (Mohanta and Bae, 2015). No discernible mating type locus was identified and only three out of eight homologs of meiosis-specific genes were found in W. ichthyophaga (Zajc et al., 2013). This seemed to be in agreement with previous studies, which failed to observe any kind of sexual reproduction in the species (Zalar et al., 2005).

To investigate the population characteristics of W. ichthyophaga, genomes of 22 strains of the species were sequenced. A strain of Wallemia hederae, a sister species of W. ichthyophaga (Jančič et al., 2016), was added to the dataset as an outgroup.

Results

Twenty-two genomes of the obligately halophilic basidiomycete W. ichthyophaga and one genome of the closely related W. hederae have been sequenced and analyzed to investigate the population structure of the species and to facilitate future studies of its extremophilic physiology. Most of the currently known strains of W. ichthyophaga were sequenced (Table 1), including isolates from sea-water-related hypersaline environments (5 strains from ponds of concentrated sea water used for salt production, 5 strains from bittern, magnesium rich water left after harvesting the other salts in salt production, 1 strain from a crystal of sea salt), from air (9 strains from air in horse and hay barns), and from low activity food (2 strains). With the exception of one strain from Namibia and one from Lofoten Islands, Norway, all the rest originated from either Slovenia or Denmark. The sequences of genome 11 (EXF-8617) were found to contain (possibly contaminant) sequences with higher similarity to W. mellicola than W. ichthyophaga, therefore this genome was excluded from all downstream analyses.

The sequencing yielded genome coverage greater than 300 × (± 99 × SD) on average and a minimum coverage above 200×. Reference-guided assembly produced on average 286 contigs (± 186 SD). Genomes of all sequenced strains shared many similarities (Table 2 and Supplementary Table S1). Like the reference genome assembly of W. ichthyophaga EXF-994, the newly sequenced genomes were very compact, with an average assembly size of 9.55 Mbp (± 0.05 Mbp SD) and with 4188 (± 14 SD) predicted coding sequences covering more than two thirds of the genomes (72.10 ± 0.64% SD). GC content (45.41 ± 0.03% SD) and intron length (68 ± 0.44 bp SD) were also very uniform across the genomes. Predicted proteomes contained on average 87.95% (± 0.61% SD) of complete basidiomycetous Benchmarking Universal Single-Copy Orthologs (BUSCOs), with less than one percent of them duplicated, and additional 5.95% (± 0.43% SD) fragmented BUSCOs. Only 5.70–6.90% BUSCOs were completely absent from the annotated genomes.

The core genome of the sequenced strains and the reference genome strain as determined by the GET_HOMOLOGUES pipeline contained 2548 genes, with additional 598 genes missing in only one or two genomes. Several categories were found to be overrepresented in this dataset. Classified by molecular functions these were: ATPase activity, transferase activity (transferring phosphorus-containing groups), ion binding, ligase activity, DNA binding, oxidoreductase activity, transmembrane transporter activity, hydrolase activity (acting on ester bonds), protein binding, RNA binding. Biological processes: cell cycle, transport, cellular response to stimulus, cellular protein modification process, transcription (DNA-templated), regulation of metabolic process, cellular localization, cellular component organization. In the cellular component classification: chromatin, catalytic complex, endomembrane system, vacuole, plasma membrane, cytosol, nuclear lumen.

In the prediction of the isolation habitat or location of the W. ichthyophaga strains from the presence and copy number of automatically annotated genes using decision tree forests, the number of genes encoding lysophospholipases was found to have the highest predictive value. Strains 12–14 and 16–19 (all from air in Denmark) had two copies of the gene, strains 7, 8, and 20 (from bittern in Slovenia) had a single copy, and the rest of the strains (seven from hypersaline habitats in Slovenia and one in Namibia, two from food in Slovenia and one from air in Denmark) lacked the gene entirely. However, when the genomes were manually searched for the gene, the differences in gene copy numbers could be ascribed to the differences in annotation, with all genomes containing two copies except genomes 7 and 8, which alone had only one copy per genome.

Similar to other genome statistics, the density of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) was low when compared to the reference W. ichthyophaga genome (Table 2 and Supplementary Table S1). SNPs covered from 0.13 to 0.40% of genomes, with an average of 0.32%. The most similar to the reference genome were genomes 7 and 8, isolated from bittern. These two genomes also formed a cluster in the principal component analysis (PCA) of the SNP data (Figure 1), joined by the genome 16 isolated from air in Denmark. Three other clusters contained genomes 12, 13, 14, and 17 (all isolated from air in Denmark), genomes 3–6, 9, and 21 from hypersaline environments in Slovenia, and finally a cluster of genomes 18 and 19 again from air in Denmark. In all these cases the number of different SNP loci between pairs of genomes within clusters was below 200. Outside these clusters the minimal number of different loci was 12062 between genomes 2 and 5, while the average difference was 31448 SNPs. While clustering of some strains could be linked to habitat or isolation location, as described above, this was not absolute, with other strains from the same habitats and/or locations positioned far from the clusters. The first two axes of the PCA of SNP data explained 40.6 and 23.4% of the variation.

FIGURE 1

Gene trees were reconstructed for 83 BUSCOs that were present as single-copy genes in all sequenced genomes and that differed between strains by at least 15 nucleotides (on average per tree). The topologies of the trees differed substantially (Figure 2). As shown by the majority rule consensus tree, only three internal tree nodes were present in more than half of the trees – the nodes at the basis of the clusters seen also on the PCA plot of SNP data: cluster of strains 7 and 8; clusters 12, 13, 14, and 17; clusters 3–6, 9, and 21. The same clusters were also observed on the minimum spanning network. Here some (but not all) other strains from the same habitats/geographical locations were also positioned in the same parts of the network. These strains also clustered together in the analysis of the population structure with the Structure software (Supplementary Figure S1). The latter analysis indicated a possible existence of admixed individuals (e.g., 10, 16, 22). Some reticulation was visible on the phylogenetic network reconstructed from the SNP data (Figure 2). Phylogenetic trees of 690 core BUSCOs of genomes of W. ichthyophaga, W. hederae, and W. mellicola confirmed the distinct phylogenetic positions of each species (Figure 2).

FIGURE 2

Different phylogenetic histories of genes in the same individual can be a sign of recombination within the population. To investigate this possibility further, linkage disequilibrium (LD) between pairs of biallelic SNP loci was calculated and plotted against the distance between the loci. In recombining organisms LD is expected to decrease with increasing distance (and thus increased likelihood of recombination) between the loci. In W. ichthyophaga the squared correlation coefficient (r²) fell to half of its maximum value at the inter-loci distance of 663–1975 bp and the fitted curve intersected the half of the maximum r² value at 1270 bp (Figure 3). The LD decay value could not be determined with great precision due to a relatively gentle slope of the curve and substantial amount of noise. Similarly, the LD decay value determined with the normalized coefficient of LD (D′) instead of r² was between 128 and 2566 (Supplementary Figure S2).

FIGURE 3

A region similar to the putative mating-type locus identified by Padamsee et al. (2012) in W. mellicola was found in all of the here sequenced genomes (Figure 4 and Supplementary File S1). Both the gene encoding a putative homeodomain-motif transcription factor Sxi1 as well as a gene encoding a putative transcription factor with a High Mobility Group (HMG) DNA binding motif were found during the automatic annotation, while an additional manual search also identified the gene STE3 encoding a pheromone receptor. Compared to the majority of strains and also to the reference genome of W. ichthyophaga EXF-994, the putative mating locus was found to be inverted in the genomes 1, 2, 15, and 16. While the inverted and flanking regions were highly similar between the two groups of strains (“reference” and “inverted”), there were substantial differences at four locations: (i) only in the genomes 1, 2, 15, and 16 there was an additional 1150 bp long sequence flanking the BAP31 gene, with no similarity to any of the sequences in the GenBank database; (ii) the HMG motif gene and its upstream region lacked a 432 bp long sequence in the genomes 1, 2, 15 and 16, while the rest of the gene differed from “reference” homolog in 19% of aligned positions; (iii) the proportion of differing nucleotide positions in the alignment of STE3 from different mating loci was 53%; (iv) in the genomes 1, 2, 15, and 16 the SXI1 gene was replaced by a sequence with unidentifiable function (Supplementary File S1). For comparison: in the alignment of the other parts of the putative mating loci from all sequenced strains the proportion of variable positions was less than 1.5%. Two possible genes for pheromone precursors were found, both encoding proteins with a prenyl group binding CAAX motif at the C-terminus. The gene for a protein with the sequence MEPETLKNIFFQEASQDHLKDEAILFETSIGMPEISSEDLANS NNPINDSTGGDNADTMYCIIV was located in the region present only in the genomes 1, 2, 15, and 16 next to the BAP31 gene, while in all other genomes a region between STE3 and CAF1 contained a putative gene encoding a protein MIPEIEVSQIQVDQVHINVEREEPGENETYGSSSGCIIT (Figure 4 and Supplementary File S1). Strains 1, 2, 15, and 16 do not represent a clonal lineage. They originated from different habitats and geographic locations and are located far apart in the minimum spanning network of strains (Supplementary Figure S1). No other chromosomal inversions in the corresponding contigs were identified (Figure 4).

FIGURE 4

Padamsee et al., 2012 and Sun et al., 2019). (B) Alignment of putative mating-type loci and their flanking regions from genomes 1 (x axis) and 22 (y axis) at two different magnifications.

Discussion

When the genome of W. ichthyophaga was first sequenced, it was found to differ from other basidiomycetes in several ways, confirming the isolated phylogenetic position of the sub-phylum Wallemiomycotina. Most striking was the compactness of its genome, which was among the smallest in sequenced Basidiomycota (9.63 Mbp) (Zajc et al., 2013) and almost five times smaller from an average basidiomycetous genome (Mohanta and Bae, 2015). Equally striking was the number of predicted genes, which, although covering more than two thirds of the genome, were in the range of bacterial genomes at 4884 predicted genes – the median protein count of E. coli genome at the time of writing is 4948 (GenBank April 9, 2019), while the average number of genes in a basidiomycetous genome as reported by Mohanta and Bae (2015) was 15432 (and 11129 in an average ascomycetous genome) (Mohanta and Bae, 2015). The 21 genomes sequenced here confirm this observation and also show a high similarity of genomes between different W. ichthyophaga strains (Table 2 and Supplementary Table S1). The genome sizes of these genomes were in the range 9.51–9.7 Mbp with a standard deviation of only 0.05 Mbp. Similarly, the average number of predicted genes was 4188 with a standard deviation of only 14. The number of predicted genes was smaller than in the reference genome, possibly due to different assembly and annotation approaches used here. The small number of genes was also reflected in the soft core genome of W. ichthyophaga, which, with only 3146 genes, was much smaller than the almost 5000-gene large core genome of S. cerevisiae, even though the latter was calculated on a much larger number of strains (Peter et al., 2018). Other genome characteristics were also similar to those of the reference genome (Table 2 and Supplementary Table S1).

The analysis of genomes uncovered four strain clusters with clonal origin, two from hypersaline habitats in Slovenia and two from air in Denmark (Figure 1 and Supplementary Table S2). The differences between the rest of the genomes did not clearly reflect either the isolation habitat or the geographical origin of the strains. Thus, while some clonal lineages were found in the same geographical location and some other strains clustered together in correspondence to their origin, there was no clear indication for the existence of cryptic (possibly inbreeding) populations, such as was observed in some other fungal species (Ellison et al., 2011; Branco et al., 2015, 2017; Duan et al., 2018; Peter et al., 2018). Apart from the above mentioned clonal clusters, the two strains with the fewest SNPs between them were 2 and 15, from different locations and different habitats, one from salt-preserved food in Slovenia, the other from air in Denmark. The genomes with the fewest SNPs compared to the reference genome were genomes 7 and 8, corresponding to strains isolated from a hypersaline habitat at the same geographical location as the reference strain. However, strains 7 and 8 were isolated in 2009, 10 years after the isolation of the reference genome and type strain W. ichthyophaga EXF-994 and strain 21 was isolated 6 years after the isolation of other clones in its cluster. This points to local persistence of a population of relatively closely related strains over at least several salt-harvesting seasons. This does not mean, however, that there is a lack of diversity even in areas as small as a few 100 m. The same bittern habitat sampled in the same location and year also yielded strain 9 that differed from strain 7 in 37464 SNPs – more than the difference between strains 7 and 18 (24556 SNPs), although the latter was isolated from the air over 1000 km away. Unfortunately, until more strains of W. ichthyophaga are isolated, the conclusions of such observations will necessarily be limited by the relatively small amount of obtainable data.

The soft core genome was enriched, as expected, with proteins involved in the fundamental cellular processes, such as cell cycle and transcription. It also contained a higher than expected number of proteins involved in transmembrane transport – a crucial cellular function, but also of utmost importance in hypersaline conditions, where maintaining physiological intracellular concentrations of inorganic and organic solutes becomes challenging (Plemenitaš et al., 2016). Retaining the full spectrum of available transporters may be of particular importance for W. ichthyophaga, since it was shown that unlike some other fungi from hypersaline environments, W. ichthyophaga does not contain a redundancy of transporters of inorganic cations (Zajc et al., 2013).

The consensus of phylogenies of core Benchmarking Universal Single-Copy Orthologs confirmed the distinct phylogenetic positions of W. ichthyophaga, W. mellicola, and W. hederae as reported by Jančič et al. (2016) based on a much smaller dataset. However, there was a lack of concordance between the gene phylogenies within W. ichthyophaga (Figure 2). Different phylogenies of the genes in the same organism are a good indicator of recombination (Tibayrenc and Ayala, 2012). Another well-established measure of the amount of recombination in a population is linkage disequilibrium (LD) decay – the distance over which LD falls to half of its maximum value due to the increased likelihood of recombination over larger distances (Taylor et al., 2015). In W. ichthyophaga the LD decay distance was around 1270 bp when measured by the squared correlation coefficient r² (Figure 3). This value is somewhat larger than that observed by Nieuwenhuis and James (2016) for several sexually reproducing fungi, but still far below the values reported for highly clonal species such as B. dendrobatidis and C. albicans where LD decay distances surpass 100 or even 200 kbp (Nieuwenhuis and James, 2016). The finding of such relatively strong indications of recombination in W. ichthyophaga were surprising for two reasons. The first was the long-held belief that the species is asexual (Plemenitaš et al., 2014). While several genes with possible roles in mating were identified when the first genome was sequenced, a well-defined mating-type locus could not be discerned. Additionally, many of the genes involved in meiosis were lacking in the genome (Zajc et al., 2013). Here, however, we describe a putative mating-type locus found in all 21 sequenced W. ichthyophaga genomes (Figure 4). The locus is similar to the one described in W. mellicola (Padamsee et al., 2012) and is inverted in four of the sequenced strains. This inverted version of the locus contains a truncated (possibly non-functional) homolog of a High-Mobility Group protein encoding gene and lacks a discernible homolog of the homeodomain proteins SXI1 or SXI2. An additional insertion/deletion between the two mating types was observed outside of the inverted region, next to the gene BAP31. While most of the inverted region was highly similar between the strains, the variability was 10–40-times larger in the genes encoding proteins involved in mating – the HMG motif containing protein and the pheromone receptor STE3 (Supplementary File S1), additionally indicating that the two identified versions of the putative MAT locus might indeed represent two different mating types of W. ichthyophaga. Chromosomal rearrangements including inversions of the mating-type locus and its surrounding are not unusual (Coelho et al., 2017). In methylotrophic ascomycetous yeasts the mating-type locus is present in two copies and switching occurs by chromosomal inversion, placing one cope in proximity to centromeric or telomeric chromatin and thus silencing its expression (Maekawa and Kaneko, 2014). In case of W. ichthyophaga, however, only one copy of the putative mating-type locus was found in each genome and it was the only non-syntenic region on the corresponding contig when comparing different strains of W. ichthyophaga (Figure 4). A similar arrangement of the putative mating-type loci was found in the genomes of 25 W. mellicola, with a locus inversion in approximately half of the strains (Sun et al., 2019).

The second reason for the past assumption that W. ichthyophaga is strictly clonal was its ecology. The species is an obligate halophile, unable to grow at water activity above 0.96 (Zalar et al., 2005) and judging by its exceedingly rare isolation from nature even with targeted efforts (Jančič et al., 2016) its abundance in nature is low. While several strains used in this study have been isolated from air, which might seem to indicate that W. ichthyophaga is not limited to extreme habitats such as hypersaline water and could therefore be relatively widespread, it should be noted that despite considerable sampling efforts it has only been found in a very small share of all collected air samples (Jančič et al., 2016). One of the traits that has been suggested as advantageous in extreme environments is asexuality. Its proposed benefits range from avoiding the costly forming of sexual structures to maintaining successful genomic configurations, which would be broken by recombination (the so-called recombination load) (Otto, 2009; Gostinčar et al., 2010, 2015, 2018). Indeed, one of the most extremely halotolerant fungi, the black yeast Hortaea werneckii, appears to be largely devoid of recombination between intraspecific phylogenetic lineages, even though the formation of the current diploid strains of H. werneckii is best explained by rare hybridizations between haploid strains (Gostinčar et al., 2018). Contrary to this, W. ichthyophaga appears to be another species on the growing list of fungi that were thought to be asexual, but were later showed to be recombining based on population genetic analyses, starting with Coccidioides immitis (Burt et al., 1996; Taylor et al., 2015), F. oxysporum (Koenig et al., 1997), Aspergillus flavus (Geiser et al., 1998), and Cenococcum geophilum (LoBuglio and Taylor, 2002). With the employment of the more powerful population genomics for this purpose (Carreté et al., 2018), the list of cryptically recombining species is expected to become much longer.

If W. ichthyophaga is really capable of sexual recombination, its meiotic machinery possibly differs from that described in other fungi. Only three out of eight meiosis-specific homologs, which are generally thought to provide strong indications of capability for meiosis (Schurko et al., 2009), were identified in the genome of the reference W. ichthyophaga EXF-994 (Zajc et al., 2013). Another possibility is that the reported decay of LD is not a consequence of sexual recombination, but a result of recombination mechanisms that do not require meiosis, such as parasexuality followed by mitotic haploidization (Pontecorvo et al., 1953). What is the mechanism of recombination in W. ichthyophaga, how can recombination occur in a species that is seemingly limited to habitats that are rare and far apart, is W. ichthyophaga in fact more abundant and better adapted to long-distance dispersion than currently thought? – these are all questions that should be addressed by future research.

Conclusion

Wallemia ichthyophaga, one of the most halophilic fungi ever described, is rarely isolated from nature. The existing isolates have been found in concentrated sea water, in air and on food preserved with low water activity. Genome sequencing of 21 W. ichthyophaga strains showed that the compact genome and low gene count are general characteristics of the species. Genome comparison indicated that while clonal lineages can be found in the same location, where they appear to persist over at least several years, phylogenetically distinct lineages can be present at the same location as well. The similarity between the genomes was not a good predictor of either the isolation habitat or geographic location. Finally, the lack of concordance between gene phylogenies, the decay of linkage disequilibrium, and the identification of a mating-type locus reported here, provide strong support to the existence of (sexual) recombination in W. ichthyophaga.

Materials and Methods

Culture, Medium, and Growth Conditions

Strains of the obligately halophilic basidiomycete W. ichthyophaga (Table 1) were obtained from the Ex Culture Collection of the Department of Biology, Biotechnical Faculty, University of Ljubljana (Slovenia). One strain of a closely related species W. hederae was added to the dataset as an outgroup. The cultivation and DNA isolation were performed as described previously (Gostinčar et al., 2018). In short, biomass was grown in the standard chemically defined Yeast Nitrogen Base medium (Qbiogene) with 0.5% (w/v) ammonium sulfate, and 2% (w/v) glucose. The pH was adjusted to 7.0 prior to autoclaving. For solid medium, 2% (w/v) agar was added. Liquid cultures were grown on a rotary shaker at 180 rpm and at 24°C. The cells were harvested in the mid-exponential growth phase (approximated by the lowering of the medium pH to pH 4) by centrifugation (5000 × g for 10 min). The cell pellets were frozen in liquid nitrogen and kept at −80°C until DNA isolation.

DNA Isolation

Fungal biomass was homogenized using a pestle and mortar, while being kept frozen using liquid nitrogen. Then, 100 mg of homogenate was transferred to 2-ml microcentrifuge tubes, each of which contained a stainless steel ball. Further homogenization was performed for 1 min using Retsch Mixer Mill 301 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, United States) at 20 Hz, keeping the tubes in holders pre-cooled with liquid nitrogen. Then 300 μL MicroBead Solution buffer was added (provided in the UltraClean Microbial DNA isolation kit; see below), and the mixtures were completely thawed on ice. These homogenates were used for DNA extraction with UltraClean Microbial DNA isolation kit (MO BIO Laboratories, United States), according to the manufacturer instructions. Contaminating RNA was removed using RNAse A (Thermo Fisher Scientific, United States). The quantity, purity and integrity of the isolated DNA were evaluated using agarose electrophoresis, spectrophotometer (NanoDrop 2000; Thermo Fisher Scientific, United States), and by fluorometry (Qubit; Thermo Fisher Scientific, United States).

Genome Sequencing

The genome sequencing was performed using the platform BGISEQ-500, with 2-bp × 150-bp libraries, prepared as described previously (Fang et al., 2018), with multiplexed barcodes. The resulting output was demultiplexed, the quality was checked with FastQC, and the reads were trimmed for adaptors and quality (removal of bases with Q < 20) using the ‘bbduk’ script¹.

The sequencing reads, assembly and annotation data have been deposited in GenBank under BioProject PRJNA527765. Data are also deposited in the China National GenBank Sequence Archive, CNSA² with accession code CNP0000446.

Variant Calling

Sequencing reads were mapped to the reference genome of W. ichthyophaga EXF-994 (GenBank APLC00000000.1) (Zajc et al., 2013) with ‘bwa mem,’ using the default parameters. Samtools 1.6 was used for sorting the mapped reads and calculating their density (Li et al., 2009), and duplicates were identified with Picard 2.10.2. The density of the reference genome coverage by sequencing reads was visualized in R with ‘ggplot2’ (Wickham, 2009; R Development Core Team, 2017). Variant calling was performed with Genome Analysis Toolkit 4.1 (Alkan et al., 2011), following the ‘Genome Analysis Toolkit (GATK) Best Practices’ workflow, but using the ‘hard filtering’ option (the filtering parameters were ‘QD < 20.0 || MQ < 40.0 | | FS > 50.0 || SOR > 8.0 || DP > 5000’). Ploidy was set to haploid.

Assembly and Annotation

The genomes were assembled using IDBA-Hybrid 1.1.3 (Peng et al., 2012). Genome of W. ichthyophaga EXF-994 (GenBank APLC00000000.1) (Zajc et al., 2013) was used as reference to guide the assembly process. The maximum k value selected was 120, the minimum support in each iteration was 2, the similarity threshold for alignment was 0.95, seed kmer was 20, maximum allowed gap in the reference was 100, and the minimum size of contigs included in the final assembly was 500.

Annotation of protein-coding and tRNA genes was performed using MAKER 2.31.8 (Campbell et al., 2014). The evidence for annotation was the fungal subset of the Swissprot database (recovered on 12. 06. 2018), and the predicted proteome of the reference W. ichthyophaga EXF-994 genome (Zajc et al., 2013). Two ab initio gene predictors were used in the MAKER pipeline: Augustus, with the training parameters for Laccaria bicolor (Stanke and Morgenstern, 2005); and Semi-HMM-based Nucleic Acid Parser (SNAP) (Korf, 2004), which was bootstrap-trained within MAKER as recommended by Campbell et al. (2014), based on the gene models derived from the alignment of the W. ichthyophaga EXF-994 proteins to the genome in the first bootstrap iteration, and with the Swissprot protein evidence added in the second and third training iteration.

The genome assembly and gene prediction completeness was evaluated with the BUSCO 3 software (Simão et al., 2015), in proteomic mode, using the dataset for basidiomycetes (Kriventseva et al., 2015). All of the parameters were used as the default values.

The files for submission to GenBank were prepared with the Genome Annotation Generator (GAG) 2.0.1 (Geib et al., 2018). All gene models with a codon region shorter than 150 bp or with introns shorter than 10 bp were removed from the final dataset.

Variant-Based Analysis

Principal component analysis of the SNP data was performed with the ‘glPca’ function from the ‘adgenet’ package (Jombart and Ahmed, 2011). Linkage disequilibrium was estimated on a dataset of biallelic SNP loci. For each pair of loci, the normalized coefficient of LD (D′) and the squared correlation coefficient (r²) were calculated using ‘vcftools’ (Danecek et al., 2011). To investigate LD decay, D′ and r² of loci within 10,000 nucleotides from each other were plotted as a function of distance and a generalized additive model (“gam”) fitted curve was added using ‘ggplot2’ in Wickham (2009) and R Development Core Team (2017). The LD decay range was determined as the interval outside which all of the arithmetic means of D′ or r² were either higher (left interval border) or lower (right interval border) than half of the maximum observed D′ or r² means. Population structure was investigated using the software Structure 2.3.4 (Pritchard et al., 2000), investigating from 1 to 6 maximum population numbers (K) with three runs for each K. The analysis was run on the whole dataset and also after exclusion of all but genome in each cluster of clonal strains.

Phylogenetic Analysis

Gene phylogenetic trees were constructed from the predicted coding sequences of all complete and single-copy BUSCOs. Sequences were aligned with MAFFT 7.407, with the ‘--auto’ option and default parameters (Katoh and Toh, 2008). This alignment was optimized using Gblocks 0.91, with the options ‘−b3 = 10 −b4 = 3 −b5 = n’ (Talavera and Castresana, 2007); if the resulting alignment was longer than 200 nucleotides and the average number of nucleotide differences between the sequence pairs was larger than 15 [as counted by the ‘infoalign’ tool included in EMBOSS 6.6.0.0 (Rice et al., 2000)], the alignment was used for reconstruction of the phylogeny with PhyML 3.1 (Guindon et al., 2010). The Hasegawa-Kishino-Yano 85 (Hasegawa et al., 1985) nucleotide substitution model was used, with the alpha parameter of the gamma distribution of substitution rate categories and the proportion of invariable sites estimated by PhyML. The resulting trees were visualized using DensiTree 2.2.5 (Bouckaert, 2010). A majority rule consensus tree was calculated with the ‘consensus.edges’ function of the package ‘phytools’ in R, using the default parameters (Revell, 2012; R Development Core Team, 2017). A separate analysis was performed using the same workflow and including the BUSCOs from W. hederae (sequenced and annotated here) and W. mellicola strain CBS 633.66 (GenBank AFQX00000000.1) (Padamsee et al., 2012).

The networks were reconstructed from the SNP data. The dissimilarity distance matrix was calculated using the R package ‘poppr’ (Kamvar et al., 2015), and was used to construct the phylogenetic network with the Neighbor-Net algorithm, as implemented in the R package ‘phangorn’ (R Development Core Team, 2017; Schliep et al., 2017). A minimum spanning network based on SNP data was constructed with the ‘poppr.msn()’ function based on bitwise distances between the genomes (Kamvar et al., 2015). Each clonal lineage was clustered together into a single network node with the function ‘mlg.filter().’

Core Genome, GO Enrichment

Pipeline GET_HOMOLOGUES 3.0.8 (Vinuesa and Contreras-Moreira, 2015) was used to estimate the core genome W. ichthyophaga from the predicted proteomes of all here sequenced strains and the reference strain W. ichthyophaga EXF-994 (Zajc et al., 2013) as a consensus of COGtriangle and OrthoMCL algorithms using default parameters. Representative sequences of each protein cluster were annotated using the PANTHER HMM scoring tools 2.1 and the HMM library version 13.1 (Thomas, 2003). Statistically significant enrichment of GO-Slim terms was investigated at www.pantherdb.org for the lists of core gene clusters (present in all 22 genomes) and soft core gene clusters (in at least 20 genomes) with a list of all gene clusters used as a reference list. Fisher’s Exact test and the False Discovery Rate correction were used.

Additionaly, gene clusters of GET_HOMOLOGUES (the number of homologs in the clusters) were used for the prediction of the habitat or isolation location. The R package ‘randomForest’ (Tang et al., 2004; R Development Core Team, 2017) was used for the construction of decision tree forests for the prediction of either condition (habitat or location) and the gene clusters that could best predict the condition were identified. The presence/absence of genes represented by these clusters was checked manually for each sequenced genome by searching the genomes using BLAST (Altschul, 1997).

Mating-Type Loci

Homologs of the genes contained in the putative mating-type locus of W. mellicola (Padamsee et al., 2012) were identified by BLAST (Altschul, 1997) searches against the assembled and annotated W. ichthyophaga genomes and predicted proteomes. The functional annotations of the genes were assigned according to Padamsee et al. (2012). The approximate position of the gene STE3 was determined by manually searching the investigated region. The detailed comparison of the loci was performed by separately aligning the upstream and downstream regions of the inversion, and the inverted region itself, in the latter case using the reverse complement sequence of the strains 1, 2, 15, and 16. Alignment was performed with MAFFT 7.407, with the ‘--auto’ option and default parameters (Katoh and Toh, 2008). Putative mating loci and their flanking regions were visualized in R with ‘ggplot2’ (Wickham, 2009; R Development Core Team, 2017). The corresponding regions of the genomes were aligned and the alignments visualized using Mummer 3.23 (Kurtz et al., 2004).

References

• 1

  AlkanC.CoeB. P.EichlerE. E. (2011). GATK toolkit.Nat. Rev. Genet.12363–376. 10.1038/nrg2958

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 2

  AltschulS. (1997). Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs.Nucleic Acids Res.253389–3402. 10.1093/nar/25.17.3389

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 3

  BouckaertR. R. (2010). DensiTree: making sense of sets of phylogenetic trees.Bioinformatics261372–1373. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq110

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 4

  BrancoS.BiK.LiaoH.-L.GladieuxP.BadouinH.EllisonC. E.et al (2017). Continental-level population differentiation and environmental adaptation in the mushroom Suillus brevipes.Mol. Ecol.262063–2076. 10.1111/mec.13892

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 5

  BrancoS.GladieuxP.EllisonC. E.KuoA.LaButtiK.LipzenA.et al (2015). Genetic isolation between two recently diverged populations of a symbiotic fungus.Mol. Ecol.242747–2758. 10.1111/mec.13132

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 6

  BurtA.CarterD. A.KoenigG. L.WhiteT. J.TaylorJ. W. (1996). Molecular markers reveal cryptic sex in the human pathogen Coccidioides immitis.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.93770–773. 10.1073/pnas.93.2.770

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 7

  CampbellM. S.HoltC.MooreB.YandellM. (2014). Genome annotation and curation using MAKER and MAKER-P.Curr. Protoc. Bioinforma.481–39. 10.1002/0471250953.bi0411s48

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 8

  CarretéL.KsiezopolskaE.PeguerolesC.Gómez-MoleroE.SausE.Iraola-GuzmánS.et al (2018). Patterns of genomic variation in the opportunistic pathogen Candida glabrata suggest the existence of mating and a secondary association with humans.Curr. Biol.2815–27. 10.1016/j.cub.2017.11.027

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 9

  CoelhoM.BakkerenG.SunS.HoodM.GiraudT. (2017). “Fungal sex: the basidiomycota,” in The Fungal Kingdom, edsGowN.HeitmanJ. (Washington, D.C: ASM Press), 147–175. 10.1128/microbiolspec.funk-0046-2016

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 10

  DanecekP.AutonA.AbecasisG.AlbersC. A.BanksE.DePristoM. A.et al (2011). The variant call format and VCFtools.Bioinformatics272156–2158. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr330

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 11

  DuanS.-F.HanP.-J.WangQ.-M.LiuW.-Q.ShiJ.-Y.LiK.et al (2018). The origin and adaptive evolution of domesticated populations of yeast from Far East Asia.Nat. Commun.9:2690. 10.1038/s41467-018-05106-7

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 12

  EllisonC. E.HallC.KowbelD.WelchJ.BremR. B.GlassN. L.et al (2011). Population genomics and local adaptation in wild isolates of a model microbial eukaryote.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.1082831–2836. 10.1073/pnas.1014971108

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 13

  FangC.ZhongH.LinY.ChenB.HanM.RenH.et al (2018). Assessment of the cPAS-based BGISEQ-500 platform for metagenomic sequencing.Gigascience7:gix133. 10.1093/gigascience/gix133

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 14

  GeibS. M.HallB.DeregoT.BremerF. T.CannolesK.SimS. B. (2018). Genome Annotation generator: a simple tool for generating and correcting WGS annotation tables for NCBI submission.Gigascience7:giy018. 10.1093/gigascience/giy018

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 15

  GeiserD. M.PittJ. I.TaylorJ. W. (1998). Cryptic speciation and recombination in the aflatoxin-producing fungus Aspergillus flavus.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.95388–393. 10.1073/pnas.95.1.388

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 16

  GostinčarC.GrubeM.De HoogS.ZalarP.Gunde-CimermanN. (2010). Extremotolerance in fungi: evolution on the edge.FEMS Microbiol. Ecol.712–11. 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2009.00794.x

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 17

  GostinčarC.Gunde-CimermanN.GrubeM. (2015). “10 Polyextremotolerance as the fungal answer to changing environments,” in Microbial Evolution under Extreme Conditions, ed.BakermansC. (Berlin: De Gruyter), 185–208. 10.1515/9783110340716.185

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 18

  GostinčarC.StajichJ. E.ZupančičJ.ZalarP.Gunde-CimermanN. (2018). Genomic evidence for intraspecific hybridization in a clonal and extremely halotolerant yeast.BMC Genomics19:364. 10.1186/s12864-018-4751-5

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 19

  GuindonS.DufayardJ. F.LefortV.AnisimovaM.HordijkW.GascuelO. (2010). New algorithms and methods to estimate maximum-likelihood phylogenies: assessing the performance of PhyML 3.0.Syst. Biol.59307–321. 10.1093/sysbio/syq010

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 20

  HasegawaM.KishinoH.YanoT. (1985). Dating of the human-ape splitting by a molecular clock of mitochondrial DNA.J. Mol. Evol.22160–174. 10.1007/BF02101694

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 21

  JančičS.NguyenH. D. T.FrisvadJ. C.ZalarP.SchroersH.-J.SeifertK. A.et al (2015). A taxonomic revision of the Wallemia sebi species complex.PLoS One10:e0125933. 10.1371/journal.pone.0125933

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 22

  JančičS.ZalarP.KocevD.SchroersH. J.Dz̆eroskiS.Gunde-CimermanN. (2016). Halophily reloaded: new insights into the extremophilic life-style of Wallemia with the description of Wallemia hederae sp. nov.Fungal Divers.7697–118. 10.1007/s13225-015-0333-x

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 23

  JombartT.AhmedI. (2011). adegenet 1.3-1: new tools for the analysis of genome-wide SNP data.Bioinformatics273070–3071. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr521

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 24

  KamvarZ. N.BrooksJ. C.GrünwaldN. J. (2015). Novel R tools for analysis of genome-wide population genetic data with emphasis on clonality.Front. Genet.6:208. 10.3389/fgene.2015.00208

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 25

  KatohK.TohH. (2008). Recent developments in the MAFFT multiple sequence alignment program.Brief. Bioinform.9286–298. 10.1093/bib/bbn013

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 26

  KoenigR. L.PloetzR. C.KistlerH. C. (1997). Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cubense consists of a small number of divergent and globally distributed clonal lineages.Phytopathology87915–923. 10.1094/PHYTO.1997.87.9.915

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 27

  KorfI. (2004). Gene finding in novel genomes.BMC Bioinformatics5:59. 10.1186/1471-2105-5-59

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 28

  Kralj KunčičM.KogejT.DrobneD.Gunde-CimermanN. (2010). Morphological response of the halophilic fungal genus wallemia to high salinity.Appl. Environ. Microbiol.76329–337. 10.1128/Aem.02318-9

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 29

  KriventsevaE. V.TegenfeldtF.PettyT. J.WaterhouseR. M.SimãoF. A.PozdnyakovI. A.et al (2015). OrthoDB v8: update of the hierarchical catalog of orthologs and the underlying free software.Nucleic Acids Res.43250–256. 10.1093/nar/gku1220

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 30

  KurtzS.PhillippyA.DelcherA. L.SmootM.ShumwayM.AntonescuC.et al (2004). Versatile and open software for comparing large genomes.Genome Biol.5:R12. 10.1186/Gb-2004-5-2-R12

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 31

  LiH.HandsakerB.WysokerA.FennellT.RuanJ.HomerN.et al (2009). The sequence alignment/map format and SAMtools.Bioinformatics252078–2079. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp352

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 32

  LoBuglioK. F.TaylorJ. W. (2002). Recombination and genetic differentiation in the mycorrhizal fungus Cenococcum geophilum Fr.Mycologia94772–780. 10.1080/15572536.2003.11833171

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 33

  MaekawaH.KanekoY. (2014). Inversion of the chromosomal region between two mating type loci switches the mating type in Hansenula polymorpha.PLoS Genet.10:e1004796. 10.1371/journal.pgen.1004796

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 34

  MohantaT. K.BaeH. (2015). The diversity of fungal genome.Biol. Proced. Online17:8. 10.1186/s12575-015-0020-z

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 35

  NieuwenhuisB. P. S.JamesT. Y. (2016). The frequency of sex in fungi.Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci.371:20150540. 10.1098/rstb.2015.0540

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 36

  OttoS. P. (2009). The evolutionary enigma of sex.Am. Nat.1741–14. 10.1086/599084

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 37

  PadamseeM.KumarT. K. A.RileyR.BinderM.BoydA.CalvoA. M.et al (2012). The genome of the xerotolerant mold Wallemia sebi reveals adaptations to osmotic stress and suggests cryptic sexual reproduction.Fungal Genet. Biol.49217–226. 10.1016/j.fgb.2012.01.007

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 38

  PengY.LeungH. C. M.YiuS. M.ChinF. Y. L. (2012). IDBA-UD: a de novo assembler for single-cell and metagenomic sequencing data with highly uneven depth.Bioinformatics281420–1428. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts174

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 39

  PeterJ.De ChiaraM.FriedrichA.YueJ.-X.PfliegerD.BergströmA.et al (2018). Genome evolution across 1,011 Saccharomyces cerevisiae isolates.Nature556339–344. 10.1038/s41586-018-0030-5

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 40

  PittJ. I.HockingA. D. (1977). Influence of solute and hydrogen-ion concentration on water relations of some xerophilic fungi.J. Gen. Microbiol.10135–40. 10.1099/00221287-101-1-35

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 41

  PlemenitašA.KonteT.GostinčarC.CimermanN. G.Gunde-CimermanN. (2016). Transport systems in halophilic fungi.Adv. Exp. Med. Biol.892307–325. 10.1007/978-3-319-25304-6_13

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 42

  PlemenitašA.LenassiM.KonteT.KejžarA.ZajcJ.GostinčC.et al (2014). Adaptation to high salt concentrations in halotolerant/halophilic fungi: a molecular perspective.Front. Microbiol.5:199. 10.3389/fmicb.2014.00199

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 43

  PontecorvoG.RoperJ. A.ForbesE. (1953). Genetic recombination without sexual reproduction in Aspergillus niger.J. Gen. Microbiol.8198–210. 10.1099/00221287-8-1-198

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 44

  PritchardJ. K.StephensM.DonnellyP. (2000). Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data.Genetics155945–959.

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 45

  R Development Core Team (2017). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Available at: https://www.r-project.org(accessed August 18, 2018).

  • Google Scholar

• 46

  RevellL. J. (2012). phytools: an R package for phylogenetic comparative biology (and other things).Methods Ecol. Evol.3217–223. 10.1111/j.2041-210X.2011.00169.x

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 47

  RiceP.LongdenI.BleasbyA. (2000). EMBOSS: the european molecular biology open software suite.Trends Genet.16276–277. 10.1016/S0168-9525(00)02024-2

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 48

  SchliepK.PottsA. J.MorrisonD. A.GrimmG. W. (2017). Intertwining phylogenetic trees and networks.Methods Ecol. Evol.81212–1220. 10.1111/2041-210X.12760

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 49

  SchurkoA. M.NeimanM.LogsdonJ. M. (2009). Signs of sex: what we know and how we know it.Trends Ecol. Evol.24208–217. 10.1016/j.tree.2008.11.010

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 50

  SimãoF. A.WaterhouseR. M.IoannidisP.KriventsevaE. V.ZdobnovE. M. (2015). BUSCO: assessing genome assembly and annotation completeness with single-copy orthologs.Bioinformatics313210–3212. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv351

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 51

  StankeM.MorgensternB. (2005). AUGUSTUS: a web server for gene prediction in eukaryotes that allows user-defined constraints.Nucleic Acids Res.33465–467. 10.1093/nar/gki458

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 52

  SunX.GostinčarC.FangC.ZajcJ.HouY.SongZ.et al (2019). Genomic evidence of recombination in the basidiomycete Wallemia mellicola.Genes10:427. 10.3390/genes10060427

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 53

  TalaveraG.CastresanaJ. (2007). Improvement of phylogenies after removing divergent and ambiguously aligned blocks from protein sequence alignments.Syst. Biol.56564–577. 10.1080/10635150701472164

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 54

  TangG. H.RabieA. B. M.HäggU. (2004). Indian hedgehog: a mechanotransduction mediator in condylar cartilage.J. Dent. Res.83434–438. 10.1177/154405910408300516

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 55

  TaylorJ. W.Hann-SodenC.BrancoS.SylvainI.EllisonC. E. (2015). Clonal reproduction in fungi.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.1128901–8908. 10.1073/pnas.1503159112

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 56

  ThomasP. D. (2003). PANTHER: a library of protein families and subfamilies indexed by function.Genome Res.132129–2141. 10.1101/gr.772403

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 57

  TibayrencM.AyalaF. J. (2012). Reproductive clonality of pathogens: a perspective on pathogenic viruses, bacteria, fungi, and parasitic protozoa.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.1093305–3313. 10.1073/pnas.1212452109

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 58

  VinuesaP.Contreras-MoreiraB. (2015). Robust identification of orthologues and paralogues for microbial pan-genomics using GET_HOMOLOGUES: a case study of pIncA/C plasmids.Methods Mol. Biol.1231203–232. 10.1007/978-1-4939-1720-4_14

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 59

  WickhamH. (2009). ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis, 2nd Edn. New York, NY: Springer.

  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 60

  ZajcJ.DžeroskiS.KocevD.OrenA.SonjakS.TkavcR.et al (2014a). Chaophilic or chaotolerant fungi: a new category of extremophiles?Front. Microbiol.5:708. 10.3389/fmicb.2014.00708

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 61

  ZajcJ.KogejT.RamosJ.GalinskiE. A.Gunde-CimermanN. (2014b). The osmoadaptation strategy of the most halophilic fungus Wallemia ichthyophaga, growing optimally at salinities above 15% NaCl.Appl. Environ. Microbiol.80247–256. 10.1128/AEM.02702-13

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 62

  ZajcJ.LiuY.DaiW.YangZ.HuJ.GostinčarC.et al (2013). Genome and transcriptome sequencing of the halophilic fungus Wallemia ichthyophaga: haloadaptations present and absent.BMC Genomics14:617. 10.1186/1471-2164-14-617

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 63

  ZajcJ.ZalarP.Gunde-CimermanN. (2017). “Yeasts in hypersaline habitats,” in Yeasts in Natural Ecosystems: Diversity, edsBuzziniP.LachanceM.-A.YurkovA. (Cham: Springer International Publishing), 293–329. 10.1007/978-3-319-62683-3_10

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 64

  ZalarP.Sybren de HoogG.SchroersH.-J.FrankJ. M.Gunde-CimermanN. (2005). Taxonomy and phylogeny of the xerophilic genus Wallemia (Wallemiomycetes and Wallemiales, cl. et ord. nov.).Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek87311–328. 10.1007/s10482-004-6783-x

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar