Abstract
Campylobacter jejuni is a major foodborne pathogen worldwide. As it forms biofilms, it can become a persistent contaminant in the food and pharmaceutical industries. In this study, it was demonstrated that C. jejuni could make more biofilm in aerobic conditions than in microaerobic conditions, and only 13.9% C. jejuni entered coccus (a VBNC state) under microaerobic conditions; however, the rate increased to 95.5% under aerobic conditions. C. jejuni could form more biofilm in mixed culture with Escherichia coli or Pseudomonas aeruginosa than in pure culture. Scanning electron microscope results showed that C. jejuni retained its normal spiral shape under aerobic conditions for 48 h by forming crosslinks with the aerobic and facultative anaerobic bacteria. Additionally, culture medium containing 0.5 mg/ml ZnO nanoparticles inhibited biofilm formation. Our results provide information on a new approach to controlling contamination via C. jejuni.
Introduction
Campylobacter jejuni is a zoonotic pathogen, and it is a major cause of foodborne diseases all over the world (). Planktonic C. jejuni is extremely susceptible to multiple stressors (; ), especially to oxygen pressure in the environment, as aerotolerance factors heavily in the transmission of C. jejuni to humans via foods under aerobic conditions (; ). C. jejuni can be observed in a viable but non-culturable (VBNC) state in vitro (; ). However, it is easy to acquire C. jejuni from water, soil, and so on (). It is also puzzling that although planktonic C. jejuni has a weak ability to survive multiple stressors in the environment, it can cause foodborne diarrheal illness (; ). Research on C. jejuni infections is rare compared to research on other foodborne pathogens, such as Salmonella and Listeria monocytogenes. However, previous research has shown that C. jejuni biofilms can resist harsh environments, which enhances its transmission ability (). Natural bacteria biofilms involve complex cellular communities and they have major implications regarding pathogenesis ().
Many bacteria have the ability to form biofilms, which involves encasing the bacteria in a sticky polymer (). Bacterial biofilms confer survival advantages to the bacteria because they protect the bacteria from environmental stressors, such as ultraviolet light, dehydration, and treatment with antimicrobial and sanitizing agents (). This makes their elimination challenging (). The formation of C. jejuni biofilm can be induced by many internal and external factors, such as the surface properties of the material that the bacteria is on, the temperature, and oxygen levels (). In nature, biofilm formation involves a mixture of bacteria (; ), which can help to provide C. jejuni protection during the transmission process. Research on mixed-culture bacterial biofilms is very popular; some research has shown that the presence of mixed populations of bacteria could enhance the number of C. jejuni (). Most studies mainly focus on genes related to biofilm formation, surface adhesion, colonization, movement, and regulation of extracellular secretions–however, it is difficult to quantify the effects of multiple genes and sequence variations (). Research has shown that the formation of C. jejuni monoculture biofilms is difficult (; ). The current study simulated the conditions () involved in the C. jejuni infection of humans (at 37°C under aerobic conditions representing the natural atmosphere) and explored the mechanisms related to infection.
Once a biofilm is formed, it is hard to remove and can cause persistent contamination. Mechanical removal is used to control biofilm formation in the food industry, but this procedure cannot be used to solve the dead angle problem. Additionally, use of surfactants and strong detergents, as well as acids, alkalis, and oxidizing agents, can lead to more serious biofilm adhesion, and it is difficult to ensure that the chemicals penetrate the biofilm to kill the bacteria (). Zinc oxide (ZnO) is “generally recognized as safe” (GRAS) according to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (21CFR182.8991). The high surface-to-volume ratio of ZnO nanoparticles allows for better interaction with, and toxicity toward, bacteria. This study is the first study to explore the use of ZnO nanoparticles to control C. jejuni biofilm formation.
Materials and Methods
Preparation of Strains
We used the standard C. jejuni strain CICC 22936, two C. jejuni isolates (3375A and 351-2B, which have a strong and weak ability to form biofilms, respectively) that were isolated by our laboratory from retail food samples in China. The C. jejuni strains were identified by conventional biochemistry and duplex PCR methods (), as has been reported by our laboratory (; ). Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC15442 and Escherichia coli ATCC12900 were used to co-culture with C. jejuni.
Biofilm Measurement
Two strains (one with a strong ability to form biofilms and one with a weak ability) were selected using crystal violet staining. The difference in biofilm formation between C. jejuni in pure culture and mixed culture with E. coli (facultative anaerobic bacteria) or P. aeruginosa (aerobic bacteria) was assessed. Additionally, three concentrations of ZnO nanoparticles were added to the medium to study the inhibition effect of ZnO nanoparticles on biofilm formation (described below).
The concentration of all the bacterial suspensions was adjusted to 0.5 McFarland using Mueller-Hinton broth (Huankai, Guangzhou, China) by assessing the optical density at 590 nm. For some of the experiments, 0.5, 5, or 50 mg ZnO nanoparticles (30 ± 10 nm; Mclean Biochemical, China) were added to liquid dispersion bottles containing 10 ml MH broth. The suspensions were then sterilized at 121°C for 15 min and used in subsequent experiments.
Biofilm Measurement by Crystal Violet Staining
Each bacterial suspension (C. jejuni CICC 22936 and E. coli cultured individually or together; C. jejuni CICC 22936 and P. aeruginosa cultured individually or together; and mixed culture of C. jejuni CICC 22936 and P. aeruginosa or E. coli treated with three concentrations of ZnO nanoparticles, 0.005, 0.05, and 0.5 mg/ml, respectively) was added to 96-well plates (Corning, United States). Each well contained 20 μl bacterial culture and 180 μl MH broth. The bacteria were cultured at 37°C for 48 h under aerobic conditions. Each sample underwent eight identical parallel tests. The 96-well plates were gently rinsed three times with sterilized water and dried at 55°C for about 30 min. Staining was conducted by adding 200 μl 0.1% crystal violet dye (Jinsui Biological, China) to each well for 10–15 min. The wells were washed with sterilized water and dried at 55°C. Next, 300 μl eluent (80% ethanol and 20% acetone) was added and the biofilm was detected by assessing the optical density at 590 nm (). The above processes were also conducted in test tubes for easier visualization of the biofilms.
Biofilm Measurement Using Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM)
First, 8-mm cell climbing film (Wohong Biological, China) was added to 48-well plates (Corning, United States). Next, 100 μl C. jejuni (pure culture) or 50 μl C. jejuni with 50 μl E. coli or P. aeruginosa bacterial culture (mixed cultures) was added to each well along with 900 μl MH broth to ensure that each sample had an equal number of cells. The bacteria were cultured at 37°C for 48 h in aerobic or microaerobic (5% O2, 10% CO2, and 85% N2) conditions. The excess liquid was removed, the plates were rinsed twice with phosphate-buffered saline, and the bacteria were then immediately fixed with 2.5% glutaraldehyde and dehydrated using a graded series of ethanol concentrations prior to observation using SEM (S-3000N; Hitachi, United States) ().
Biofilm Measurement Using Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy
First, 200 μl ZnO nanoparticles suspension was added to 24-well plates and 14-mm-diameter cell climbing film was used as the carrier. Next, 200 μl C. jejuni (pure culture) or 100 μl C. jejuni with 100 μl E. coli or P. aeruginosa bacterial culture (mixed cultures) were added to each well along with 1800 μl MH broth. The bacteria were cultured at 37°C for 48 h in aerobic conditions. Excess liquid was removed by pipetting, and the 24-well plates were washed with sterile water three times. Thereafter, 500 μl of 0.1% SYTO 9 Green Fluorescent Nucleic Acid Stain (Thermo Scientific, United States) was added and incubated at 37°C for 30 min and 500 μl of 10% propidium iodide (PI) was added and incubated at 4°C for 15 min in the dark (). Residual dye was removed and the plates were washed prior to observation using confocal laser scanning microscopy (LSM 700; Carl Zeiss, Germany).
Results
Biofilm Formation of C. jejuni in Pure Culture
Campylobacter jejuni biofilm formation was compared between aerobic and microaerobic conditions in pure culture. There were two morphology types of cells, the number of which was quantified in a fixed area of the microscope. As shown in Figures 1a,b, repeated the count three times in each different culture condition 86.1% C. jejuni had a normal spiral shape and 13.9% C. jejuni entered coccus (a VBNC state) under microaerobic conditions. Only 4.5% C. jejuni had a normal spiral shape, and 95.5% C. jejuni entered coccus under aerobic condition.
FIGURE 1
The crosslinking substances were increased in Figure 1b compared to Figure 1a, indicating that there was more C. jejuni biofilm formation under aerobic conditions than under microaerobic conditions.
Biofilm Formation of C. jejuni in Mixed Culture With E. coli or P. aeruginosa
The C. jejuni biofilm formation under aerobic conditions was compared between pure and mixed cultures. The C. jejuni in pure culture had a changed morphology, as shown in Figure 1b. However, in mixed culture with E. coli or P. aeruginosa, it retained its normal spiral shape, as shown in Figures 2a,b. In mixed culture, C. jejuni, which had a normal spiral shape, was near E. coli or P. aeruginosa. Additionally, the crystal violet staining (in both the test tubes and 96-well plates) demonstrated that the biofilm formation of C. jejuni increased in mixed culture with E. coli and P. aeruginosa compared to in pure culture, as shown in Figure 3.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 3
Crystal violet staining was conducted to detect biofilms of C. jejuni, P. aeruginosa, and E. coli pure or mixed cultures in 96-well plates in aerobic conditions at 37°C for 48 h. The co-cultured C. jejuni formed significantly more biofilms than the C. jejuni in pure culture.
In addition, biofilms in pure and mixed cultures were compared using confocal laser scanning microscopy with SYTO9 and PI staining, as shown in Figure 4. The fluorescence signal was stronger in the mixed cultures than in the pure culture, indicating that the number of live cells in the mixed culture biofilms was greater than in the pure culture biofilms.
FIGURE 4
Effect of ZnO Nanoparticles on Biofilm Formation
The ZnO nanoparticles inhibited the biofilm formation of C. jejuni under aerobic conditions at 37°C. Three concentrations of ZnO nanoparticles (0.005, 0.05, and 0.5 mg/ml) were tested, and a significant inhibitory effect was observed at a concentration of ZnO nanoparticles of 0.5 mg/ml (but not at 0.005 or 0.05 mg/ml), as shown in Figures 4, 5. After treatment with 0.5 mg/ml ZnO nanoparticles, the examination of the mixed cultures (C. jejuni with either P. aeruginosa or E. coli) by SEM indicated that the morphology of the bacteria was no longer the same as the morphology of the mixed cultures without ZnO, as shown in Figure 6.
FIGURE 5
FIGURE 6
Discussion
The most intensive formation of biofilm by C. jejuni was observed in this study under aerobic conditions. Additionally, after 48 h under aerobic conditions, C. jejuni could not be cultivated, as C. jejuni entered a VBNC state (shrinking and losing its spiral shape) under aerobic conditions. However, when co-cultured with E. coli or P. aeruginosa, the survival rate of C. jejuni increased due to the presence of P. aeruginosa or E. coli. This makes the environment more favorable, by lowering the oxygen level and altering the secondary metabolite levels (). Biofilm formation can increase the ability of bacteria to survive in adverse environments.
It is complicated to remove biofilms because of the sophisticated biofilm regulatory mechanisms involving many genes () that underlie biofilm formation (; ; ; ). Previous research showed that only nanosized ZnO particles had an antibiofilm effect (), mainly because ZnO nanoparticles are small and have a large specific surface area and high oxidation ability, and their effects against biofilms are attributable to the generation of reactive oxygen species on their surface (; ).
When the ZnO concentration was 0.005 and 0.05 mg/ml, there was no biofilm inhibition effect, and the biofilm even slightly increased. The inhibition effect only appeared when the ZnO concentration was 0.5 mg/ml. It was presumed that the biofilm offered protection against the effects of the lower ZnO concentrations (). Biofilms can slightly increase (up to a certain point) when harmful substances stimulate the protection mechanisms of the bacteria, but this does not work if the stress is beyond the regulation ability of the biofilm, and so the high-concentration ZnO nanoparticles had an obvious inhibition effect (). With the development of high-throughput sequencing, it will be easier to identify associations between C. jejuni genotypes and biofilm phenotypes in the future, and this will provide new ideas to control persistent biofilms.
Conclusion
This is the first study of microaerobic bacteria (C. jejuni) co-cultured with aerobic bacteria (P. aeruginosa) and facultative anaerobic bacteria (E. coli). Based on SEM, C. jejuni retained its normal spiral shape under aerobic conditions for 48 h by forming crosslinks with the aerobic and facultative anaerobic bacteria, which might explain how the microaerobic bacteria C. jejuni can survive outside hosts and how it has become a leading cause of foodborne diarrheal illness. Additionally, 0.5 mg/ml ZnO nanoparticles clearly inhibited biofilm formation, which represents an exciting new approach for developing antibacterial products in the future.
Statements
Data availability statement
All datasets generated for this study are included in the article/supplementary material.
Author contributions
XZ, QW, MC, LX, XW, and JZ contributed to the conception and design of the study. XZ, XN, and ZM organized the database. XZ, SW, and QW performed the statistical analysis. XZ wrote the manuscript. JZ, QW, JW, YD, and YZ supervised the manuscript. All authors contributed to the manuscript revision and read and approved the submitted version of the manuscript.
Funding
We gratefully acknowledge the financial support of the National Key R&D Program of China (2018YFC1602500); the Science and Technology Planning Project of Guangdong Province, China (2017B090904004); and GDAS’ Special Project of Science and Technology Development (2017GDASCX-0201).
Conflict of interest
XZ is employed by Hong Zheng Dao (China) Traditional Chinese Medicine Research Company Ltd. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
References
1
AlvesM. M.BouchamiO.TavaresA.CórdobaL.SantosC. F.MiragaiaM.et al (2017). New insights into antibiofilm effect of a nanosized ZnO coating against the pathogenic methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus.Acs Appl. Mater Interfaces9:28157. 10.1021/acsami.7b02320
2
ArenasJ.TommassenJ. (2017). Meningococcal biofilm formation: let’s stick together.Trends Microbiol.25:113. 10.1016/j.tim.2016.09.005
3
BaeJ.JeonB. (2013). Increased emergence of fluoroquinolone-resistant Campylobacter jejuni in biofilm.Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.57:5195. 10.1128/aac.00995-13
4
EunaO.LynnM. M.ByeonghwaJ. (2015). High prevalence of hyper-aerotolerant Campylobacter Jejuni in retail poultry with potential implication in human infection.Front. Microbiol.6:1263. 10.3389/fmicb.2015.01263
5
HanningI.JarquinR.SlavikM. (2008). Campylobacter jejuni as a secondary colonizer of poultry biofilms.J. Appl. Microbiol.1051199–1208. 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2008.03853.x
6
IcaT.CanerV.IstanbulluO.NguyenH. D.AhmedB.CallD. R.et al (2012). Characterization of mono- and mixed-culture Campylobacter jejuni biofilms.Appl. Environ. Microbiol.781033–1038. 10.1128/AEM.07364-11
7
JoshuaG. W.GuthrieironsC.KarlyshevA. V.WrenB. W. (2006). Biofilm formation in Campylobacter jejuni.Microbiology152387–396. 10.1099/mic.0.28358-0
8
JothiprakasamV.SambanthamM.ChinnathambiS.VijayaboopathiS. (2017). Candida tropicalis biofilm inhibition by ZnO nanoparticles and EDTA.Arch. Oral. Biol.7321–24. 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2016.09.003
9
KarkiA. B.WellsH.FakhrM. K. (2019). Retail liver juices enhance the survivability of Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli at low temperatures.Sci. Rep.9:2733. 10.1038/s41598-018-35820-7
10
KimJ.ParkH.KimJ.KimJ. H.JungJ.IChoS.et al (2019). comparative analysis of aerotolerance, antibiotic resistance, and virulence gene prevalence in Campylobacter jejuni isolates from retail raw chicken and duck meat in South Korea.Microorganisms7:433. 10.3390/microorganisms7100433
11
KwiecinskiJ. M.JacobssonG.HorswillA. R.JosefssonE.JinT. (2019). Biofilm formation by Staphylococcus aureus clinical isolates correlates with the infection type.Infect Dis.51446–451. 10.1080/23744235.2019.1593499
12
LeeH.LeeS.KimS.HaJ.LeeJ.ChoiY.et al (2019). The risk of aerotolerant Campylobacter jejuni strains in poultry meat distribution and storage.Microb. Pathog.134:103537. 10.1016/j.micpath.2019.05.020
13
MagajnaB. A.SchraftH. (2015). Campylobacter jejuni biofilm cells become viable but non-culturable (VBNC) in low nutrient conditions at 4° more quickly than their planktonic counterparts.Food Control5045–50. 10.1016/j.foodcont.2014.08.022
14
NobileC. J.MitchellA. P. (2005). Regulation of Cell-Surface Genes and Biofilm Formation by the C. albicans Transcription Factor Bcr1p.Curr. Biol.151150–1155. 10.1016/j.cub.2005.05.047
15
OhE.AndrewsK. J.McMullenL. M.JeonB. (2019). Tolerance to stress conditions associated with food safety in Campylobacter jejuni strains isolated from retail raw chicken.Sci. Re.91–9. 10.1038/s41598-019-48373-0
16
OhE.ChuiL.BaeJ.LiV.MaA.MutschallS. K.et al (2018). Frequent implication of multistress-tolerant Campylobacter jejuni in human infections - volume 24, number 6—june 2018 - emerging infectious disease journal - cdc.Emerg. Infect. Dis241037. 10.3201/eid2406.171587
17
OttoM. (2014). Physical stress and bacterial colonization.FEMS Microbiol. Rev.38:1250. 10.1111/1574-6976.12088
18
OuyangK.WalkerS. L.YuX. Y.GaoC. H.HuangQ.CaiP. (2018). Metabolism, survival, and gene expression of pseudomonas putida to hematite nanoparticles mediated by surface-bound humic acid.Environ. Sci.Nano5682–695. 10.1039/c7en01039g
19
OuyangK.YuX. Y.ZhuY.GaoC.HuangQ.CaiP. (2017). Effects of humic acid on the interactions between zinc oxide nanoparticles and bacterial biofilms.Environ. Poll.231(Pt 1), 1104–1111. 10.1016/j.envpol.2017.07.003
20
PascoeB.MéricG.MurrayS.YaharaK.MageirosL.BowenR.et al (2016). Enhanced biofilm formation and multi-host transmission evolve from divergent genetic backgrounds in Campylobacter jejuni.Environ. Microbiol.174779–4789. 10.1111/1462-2920.13051
21
ReeserR. J.MedlerR. T.BillingtonS. J.JostB. H.JoensL. A. (2007). Characterization of Campylobacter jejuni biofilms under defined growth conditions.Appl. Environ. Microbiol.731908–1913. 10.1128/aem.00740-06
22
RuiH. E.HuangJ. L.Hai-YanX. U.JieS. U.PanZ. M.JiaoX. A. (2007). Development and application of multiplex PCR assay for the detection of Campylobacter spp.J. f Yangzhou Univ.9:3280.
23
SakuragiY.KolterR. (2007). Quorum-sensing regulation of the biofilm matrix genes (pel) of Pseudomonas aeruginosa.J. Bacteriol.189:5383. 10.1128/jb.00137-07
24
SandersS. Q.BootheD. H.FrankJ. F.ArnoldJ. W. (2007). Culture and detection of Campylobacter jejuni within mixed microbial populations of biofilms on stainless steel.J. Food Prot.70:1379. 10.4315/0362-028x-70.6.1379
25
SetyawatiM. I.TayC. Y.LeongD. T. (2015). Nanotoxicity: mechanistic investigation of the biological effects of SiO2. TiO2, and ZnO Nanoparticles on intestinal cells (Small 28/2015).Small11:3458. 10.1002/smll.201403232
26
ShuklaS. K.MangwaniN.KarleyD.RaoT. S. (2017). “Bacterial biofilms and genetic regulation for metal detoxification,” in Handbook of Metal-Microbe Interactions and Bioremediation, edsDasS.DashH. R. (Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press), 317–332. 10.1201/9781315153353-23
27
SolanoC.EcheverzM.LasaI. (2014). Biofilm dispersion and quorum sensing.Curr. Opin. Microbiol.1896. 10.1016/j.mib.2014.02.008
28
StetsenkoV. V.EfimochkinaN. R.PichuginaT. V. (2019). Growth and Persistence of Campylobacter jejuni in Foodstuffs.Bull. Exp. Biol. Med.166759–765. 10.1007/s10517-019-04435-x
29
TehA. H. T.SuiM. L.DykesG. A. (2014). Does Campylobacter jejuni form biofilms in food-related environments?Appl. Environ. Microbiol.805154–5160. 10.1128/AEM.01493-14
30
TehK. H.FlintS.FrenchN. (2010). Biofilm formation by Campylobacter jejuni in controlled mixed-microbial populations.Int. J. Food Microbiol.143:118. 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2010.07.037
31
WuQ.ZhongX.ZhangJ. (2016). Research progress in biofilm formation and regulatory mechanism of Campylobacter jejuni.Acta Microbiol. Sinica56:180.
32
ZhengY.WuQ.WuK.ZhangJ.GuoW.WuK. (2014). Virulence-associated gene detection and ERIC-PCR typing of Campylobacter jejuni strains isolated from foods in four Southern Chinese provinces.Acta Microbiol. Sinica5414.
33
ZhongX.WuQ.ZhangJ.ShenS. (2016). Prevalence, genetic diversity and antimicrobial susceptibility of Campylobacter jejuni isolated from retail food in china.Food Control6210–15. 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-16-561
Summary
Keywords
Campylobacter jejuni, biofilm, mixed culture, pure culture, ZnO nanoparticles
Citation
Zhong X, Wu Q, Zhang J, Ma Z, Wang J, Nie X, Ding Y, Xue L, Chen M, Wu S, Wei X and Zhang Y (2020) Campylobacter jejuni Biofilm Formation Under Aerobic Conditions and Inhibition by ZnO Nanoparticles. Front. Microbiol. 11:207. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.00207
Received
21 October 2019
Accepted
29 January 2020
Published
10 March 2020
Volume
11 - 2020
Edited by
Lin Lin, Jiangsu University, China
Reviewed by
Mohamed K. Fakhr, The University of Tulsa, United States; Sangryeol Ryu, Seoul National University, South Korea; Zaixiang Lou, Jiangnan University, China
Updates
Copyright
© 2020 Zhong, Wu, Zhang, Ma, Wang, Nie, Ding, Xue, Chen, Wu, Wei and Zhang.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Qingping Wu, wuqp203@163.com
This article was submitted to Food Microbiology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Microbiology
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.