Abstract
We report on the effect of the end-Cretaceous impact event on the present-day deep microbial biosphere at the impact site. IODP-ICDP Expedition 364 drilled into the peak ring of the Chicxulub crater, México, allowing us to investigate the microbial communities within this structure. Increased cell biomass was found in the impact suevite, which was deposited within the first few hours of the Cenozoic, demonstrating that the impact produced a new lithological horizon that caused a long-term improvement in deep subsurface colonization potential. In the biologically impoverished granitic rocks, we observed increased cell abundances at impact-induced geological interfaces, that can be attributed to the nutritionally diverse substrates and/or elevated fluid flow. 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing revealed taxonomically distinct microbial communities in each crater lithology. These observations show that the impact caused geological deformation that continues to shape the deep subsurface biosphere at Chicxulub in the present day.
Introduction
Asteroid and comet impact events are known to be able to cause severe disruption to surface-dwelling organisms and ecosystems (). One such example is the end-Cretaceous Chicxulub impact, which led to the extinction of non-avian dinosaurs and ∼75% of all species (; ). Despite the growing understanding of the effects of impacts on life, we have little knowledge of how these events, particularly the geological changes caused by them, influence the abundance and distribution of microbial life in the deep subsurface over time as opposed to the microbial changes caused by drastic environmental changes resulting from impact (; Schaefer et al., 2020). As the deep microbial biosphere has an important role to play in global biogeochemical cycles, such as the carbon cycle (; ; ), it is of considerable interest to investigate how it has been shaped by catastrophic geological events in the past.
In near-surface environments, asteroid impacts have been shown to increase the porosity and permeability of rocks, enhancing microbial colonization (, ; ; ). In contrast, sedimentary rocks which often already contain microbially accessible porosity (), may have their porosity reduced by impact, resulting in a loss of colonization space (). Although these observations inform us about how shock metamorphism and heating affect different rock types, we lack an understanding of how impacts shape the microbial biosphere at the regional scale and how deep subsurface fracturing of rocks, for example, influences the availability of redox couples and nutrients by changing fluid flow at lithological boundaries and within units.
The International Ocean Discovery Program (IODP) and International Continental Scientific Drilling Program (ICDP) Expedition 364 drilled into the Chicxulub crater peak ring, which is a discontinuous topographic ring that is now buried by Cenozoic sediments (Figure 1). The expedition recovered a continuous core (site M0077) from 505.7 to 1,334.7 m below seafloor (mbsf) (, ) and encountered the top of the peak ring at ∼618 mbsf.
FIGURE 1
In this study, we describe the microbial abundance and community within the Chicxulub crater and discuss how the impact has influenced the distribution of organisms within the present-day structure. We discuss the implications of this work for the role of impacts in planetary processes.
Materials and Methods
Core and Sample Collection
Core material was obtained during the IODP and ICDP Expedition 364 (Drilling the Chicxulub K-Pg Impact Crater). Samples were obtained from the major lithostratigraphic units (
Core sections were retrieved from the core immediately after they had arrived on the drilling rig. The samples were prepared aseptically in the microbiology laboratory prepared for this purpose. To minimize the chance of cross contamination with foreign microbial cells, subsampling was carried out next to a Bunsen burner to create a sterile field. The segments were placed onto baked (8 h, 500°C) sterile aluminum foil, and flame-sterilized with 70% ethanol. The surface was then sprayed with DNA Away (Thermo Scientific) to also degrade contaminant extracellular DNA. Edges were removed using a flame-sterilized chisel, or samples were broken in sterile foil and segments interior to the sample were retrieved. Subsamples of the interior of the core were collected for analysis. Samples of core material (∼1–2 g) were placed into 10 ml sterile vials containing 4 ml sterile 7% NaCl/4% formamide solution for cell enumerations. Samples of core material (∼1–10 g) for cultivation experiments were collected aseptically into 10 ml glass vials and gassed with N2 using a sterile cannula. These samples were stored at 4°C until processing. Samples of core material (∼10–50 g) were collected into a sterile Whirl-PakTM bag, double bagged, and stored at −80°C until return to the laboratory for DNA extraction. These procedures were carried out at least every 9 m through the core. An attempt was made by the geochemistry team to obtain pore water samples for geochemical analysis, but there was insufficient water to obtain samples.
Core Porosity Determination
Porosity measurements were performed on ∼6 cm3 core plugs, approximately once per section (
Borehole Fluid Temperature and in situ Temperature Estimates
Borehole fluid temperatures were acquired at the drill site M0077 with a QL40-FTC probe (
In situ Opened Fracture Determination
Acoustic borehole images were acquired at the drill Site M0077 with a QL40-ABI probe (
Sulfur Analysis and Bulk X-ray Fluorescence
Homogenized powders of 281 whole rock samples between core sections 3-1 and 303-1 (506.17–1,332.75 mbsf) were measured for total sulfur content by means of a LECO CS-300 carbon sulfur analyzer (
Contamination Control
In this drilling expedition, we were not able to add a tracer to the drilling mud. Our means of contamination control was to examine the microbial communities within the drilling mud and seawater mix. Samples of the drilling mud and seawater mix were collected from the drill mud stream in sterile 50 ml Falcon tubes prior to injection into the hole to determine the abundance of microorganisms and the microbial community that would be present on the exterior of cores. Some of this material (∼1–2 g) was preserved as described for core cell enumeration. The remaining material was stored at −80°C for DNA extraction. Samples of drilling mud and seawater mix were acquired every 9 m where possible. In the postimpact material, samples were acquired at 518 mbsf and resumed at 625 mbsf because of complications encountered in drilling in this section.
Cell Enumerations
Material was collected for cell enumeration as described above. In the case of granitic samples, rocks were gently broken using a sterile mortar and pestle prior to addition to the vials. Suevite and postimpact samples readily disaggregated into a fine powder in the fluid. A volume of two hundred microliters of this material was removed from the vial and diluted if appropriate. An aliquot of a 1 × 1,000 working solution of SYBRTM Gold dye (ThermoFisher Scientific) was added. After incubation for 15 min in the dark, the solutions were filtered using a vacuum pump onto a black sterile 0.22-μm-pore 25-mm diameter polycarbonate filter (Merck Millipore). The filter was transferred to a glass slide, and the slide was viewed under blue light (I3 prism) with a × 100 magnification objective of a fluorescent microscope (Leica DM4000B). Cells were counted in 200 fields of view defined by a 100 × 100 μm grid. The total number of cells was determined and converted into the number of cells per gram of core material, consistent with methods applied in other continental deep subsurface studies (
Enrichment Cultures
The enrichment cultures were prepared after the return of the samples to the laboratory 30 days after the end of drilling. In the Cockell lab, samples of core material of ∼1.5 g were dispensed into 10 ml serum bottles in a Coy anaerobic chamber (Coy Laboratory Products, United States) and 1 ml of media was added. The amounts of media added were chosen to maximize the rock to fluid ratio, generating a slurry of core material. The main purpose of the media was to provide minor additional nutrients and redox couples. The following media were used:
Subsurface Medium I (MM1)
To supply CHNOPS elements and redox couples (iron and sulfate reduction) to enrich for anaerobic respirers and fermenters. NH4Cl (3.7 mM), K2HPO4 (1.1 mM), Na2SO4 (1.4 mM), and iron citrate (0.41 mM). The following carbon sources, all at 0.2 g/L: yeast extract, peptone, casamino acids, and sodium acetate. Samples were gassed with a 100% N2 or 20% CO2/80% N2 headspace.
Subsurface Medium II (MMII)
To supply CHNOPS elements and redox couples (iron, sulfate, and nitrate reduction) to enrich for anaerobic respirers and fermenters. A richer version of MM1. NH4Cl, K2HPO4, and Na2SO4 the same as MM1, but with KNO3 (2.0 mM) and iron citrate (4.0 mM). The following carbon sources, all at 0.2 g/L: yeast extract, peptone, sodium acetate, casamino acid, sodium formate, xylan, fructose, and sodium pyruvate. NaHCO3 (1.25 g in 25 ml) was autoclaved separately and added. Samples were gassed with a 20% CO2/80% N2 headspace.
Simple Organics Medium (Org)
To enrich for organisms that might use small organic molecules as an electron donor or to ferment. NH4Cl (18.7 mM), K2HPO4 (5.7 mM), KCl (6.7 mM), and MgSO4 × 7 H2O (2.2 mM). The following carbon sources, all at 1.0 g/L: sodium gluconate, sodium acetate, sodium formate, and sodium fumarate. Samples were gassed with an 80% CO2/20% N2 headspace.
Subsurface Chemolithotroph Medium (Chemolith)
To enrich for chemolithotrophs. NH4Cl (37.4 mM), K2HPO4 (11.5 mM), KNO3 (19.8 mM), Na2SO4 (14.1 mM), iron citrate (4.1 mM), and NiCl2 × 6H2O (3 mg/L). NaHCO3 (1.25 g in 25 ml) was autoclaved separately and added. Samples were gassed with an 80% H2/20% CO2 headspace.
Organics/H2 Medium (OrgH)
To enrich for organisms using H2 as the electron donor or organics. NH4Cl (18.7 mM), CaCl2 (1.0 mM), K2HPO4 (2.3 mM), MgCl2 × 6H2O (1 mM), MgSO4 × 7H2O (0.09 mM), and yeast extract (1.0 g/L). NaHCO3 (1.25 g in 25 ml) were autoclaved separately and added. The following were also added as typical constituents of anaerobic media to provide additional nutrients: 10 ml Wolfe’s trace element solution, 10 ml Wolfe’s vitamin solution, and 1 ml tungstate-selenate solution. Samples were gassed with an 80% H2/20% CO2 headspace.
All enrichment samples were incubated for 8 months. Media without sample material was incubated to confirm that media was not contaminated. Core material shallower than a depth of 802 mbsf (core 114) were incubated at 50°C, samples between 802 and 1124 mbsf (core 235) were incubated at 60°C, and samples between 1,124 mbsf to the bottom of the core (depth of 1,333 mbsf, core 303) were incubated at 70°C. Incubation was performed at temperatures expected to be close to in situ conditions. These were derived from downhole logging measurements of the in situ borehole fluid temperature (see “Borehole fluid temperature and in situ temperature estimates”). A total of 240 enrichments were established. At 50°C, 23 × MM1, 42 × MM2, 21 × Chemolith, 21 × OrgH, 10 × Org; at 60°C, 37 × MM2, 8 × Chemolith, 8 × OrgH, 9 × Org; at 70°C, 12 × MM1, 23 × MM2, 8 × Chemolith, 8 × OrgH, 10 × Org.
After incubation, samples were vigorously vortexed and 50 μl of fluid was removed under anaerobic conditions. Five microliters of a 1 × 1,000 working solution of SYBRTM Green DNA binding dye (Invitrogen, United Kingdom) was added, and the sample was left for 15 min. Samples were then analyzed for the presence of cells by fluorescence microscopy.
Samples that were found positive for cells were then DNA extracted using the DNeasy PowerSoil Kit (QIAGEN, Germantown, MD, United States). 16S rRNA gene libraries were prepared for subsequent MiSeq Illumina sequencing using the primers 28F (GAGTTTGATCNTGGCTCAG) and 388R (TGCTGCCTCCCGTAGGAGT) targeting the V1–V2 region. Samples were sequenced by RTL Genomics (Lubbock, Texas, United States). Bioinformatic analysis was undertaken using QIIME2 as described in detail below. We sequenced 10 of the enrichments that did not support any microscopically observed growth and one sample of each of the media used for enrichment. DNA sequences observed corresponded to those expected from kit contaminants (e.g., Streptococcaceae, Staphylococcaceae) (
The media in which reported enrichments were achieved were as follows: 50°C enrichments: Aeromonas (MM2) and Acidiphilium (MM1); 60°C enrichments: Desulfovermiculus (MM2), Desulfovermiculus (Org), Enhydrobacter (MM1), and Brockia (OrgH). No enrichments yielded organisms at 70°C.
DNA Extraction From Core and Drilling Mud Material
In the Coolen lab at Curtin University, DNA extraction was carried out to obtain the total environmental DNA from the whole sample, irrespective of whether it was from inactive or active organisms. For the analysis of core material, the following extraction procedure was used: core material (∼10 g pieces from the center of the core) was defrosted aseptically in a HEPA-filtered horizontal laminar flow hood (SafeGuardHLFTM). Prior to DNA extraction, possible remaining traces of contaminant surficial DNA on the rock samples, which were already aseptically sampled offshore, was crosslinked for 10 min on each side inside a UVLink Ultraviolet crosslinker (UVITEC Cambridge) by placing the pieces of rock 1 cm away from the 5 × 8 W 254 nm bulbs. The UV-sterilized pieces of rock (∼5–10 g) were then pulverized using a heat-sterilized (8 h at 500°C) mortar and pestle. This material was then used for DNA extraction using the DNeasy PowerMax Soil Kit (QIAGEN) with modifications after
16S rRNA Gene Library Preparation
For the preparation of quantitative PCR mixtures, aliquots of extracted and purified DNA from the various rock samples and controls were added to 20 μl reaction mixtures with 1 × GreenTM Premix Ex TaqTM (Tli RNaseH Plus) (Takara Bio Inc) and 0.2 μM final concentration of primers U519fM (Wuchter et al., 2013) and U806R (
Bioinformatics and Biostatistics
The obtained IIlumina MiSeq reads were processed using the Quantitative Insights into Microbial Ecology 2 (QIIME2, version 2020.111) pipeline (
Contaminant ASVs that were present in the rock samples as well as in the various controls (drilling muds, sea water, and procedural blanks) were removed from the ASV × sample abundance matrix and analyzed separately (Supplementary Table 6). This included the stringent removal of rare ASVs that could have represented undetected contaminants in the controls. Therefore, only ASVs that occurred more than 10 times in at least one sample were considered for downstream analysis.
A Venn diagram prepared in the online program Gene List Venn Diagram2 was used to reveal the number of microbial taxa assigned at the lowest identified taxonomic levels that were unique to or shared between the three lithologies. Canonical analysis of principal coordinates (CAP) was performed in the biostatistical package PRIMER E vs. 7 (
Results
Microbial Abundance in Suevites
Cell enumerations were begun at 506 mbsf in the postimpact sequence and continued at 9 m intervals throughout the core, although in some locations additional samples were studied (Supplementary Table 1). Above the crater, in the Paleogene postimpact sedimentary sequence (lithostratigraphic units 1E to 1G; Figure 2;
FIGURE 2

Microbial abundance through the Chicxulub Expedition 364 (site 0077A) core. Diagram showing cell enumerations alongside total extracted DNA and total organic carbon (TOC) content, porosity, and open fractures. The limit of detection is taken as 1 × 104 cells/g. The horizontal lines separate the sections of suevite. TOC and porosity are displayed as moving averages of each 20 m depth. The classification of the geological units adopted by the drilling expedition scientists are shown alongside (see section “Materials and methods”).
Transitioning into the impactite lithologies (suevite Unit 2A starting at ∼617.33 mbsf, Figure 2), we observe a marked increase in cell abundances at the top of the suevite, which exceed 1 × 107 cells/g wet weight (see “Materials and Methods” for unit descriptions). This sorted suevite was formed by ground surge, explosive interactions between hot impact melt and seawater (
Cell numbers decline at the bottom of unit 2A near a suggested erosional contact within the suevite (
We observe increases in cell numbers at unit interfaces, such as between suevite units 2B and 2C (cell numbers 1.5 × 106/g) where increasing clast size is noted and between impact melt rock unit 3B and impact-uplifted granitic basement unit 4 (cell numbers 1.2 × 106/g).
Microbial Abundance in Impact-Shocked Granites
Below ∼766 mbsf in the granitic basement material (unit 4), we find low or undetectable cell abundances (Figures 2, 3) in most of the samples analyzed. Our data are the first microbiological analysis of a deep continuous core from continental granites. Previous studies of deep subsurface granites have been localized to point sampling in locations such as boreholes and deep mines where there is a well-established water flow. In these environments, cell numbers are typically on the order of ∼104 cell/ml (
FIGURE 3

Box plots of cell numbers associated with Chicxulub impact lithologies. Lithologies shown are postimpact sedimentary rocks, suevite (cell enumerations in all suevite units), granite basement alone (elevated cell counts in non-granitic material removed), and non-granite rocks in the granitic unit (i.e., geological interfaces within the granitic unit). Logarithmically transformed data are shown as a box plot.
Nevertheless, we observed regions in the granites with elevated cell abundances (Figures 2, 3). These locations correspond to non-granitic rocks such as strongly serpentinized preimpact subvolcanic, ultramafic basanite/dolerite (847.57 and 865.20 mbsf), and places where suevite and impact melt rock were intercalated into the granites during crater formation, containing a range of mafic gneiss lithologies (1,274.20–1, 291.17 mbsf).
Microbial Enrichment Experiments
Cultivation experiments using media targeting different groups of organisms including heterotrophs (anaerobic respiration and fermentation) and chemolithotrophs (see “Materials and methods”) resulted in 240 enrichments. Of the 240 enrichments, six yielded growth of organisms consistent with the challenge of enriching organisms from oligotrophic deep subsurface environmental samples (
Microbial Community Analysis
In total, 3,090 ASVs were recovered from all samples combined and 2,757 more abundant ASVs (∼90%) remained after the stringent removal of rare ASVs which did not occur more than 10 times in at least one of the analyzed samples (Supplementary Table 2). After stringent quality control, 1,737 ASVs were identified as being indigenous to the various analyzed rock samples, and a total of 1,018 contaminant ASVs, which occurred also in the various controls (drilling muds, sea water, and procedural blanks), were removed from the dataset and analyzed separately (Supplementary Figures 3, 4). A total of 843, 604, and 141 ASVs were unique for the postimpact sediments, suevite, and granitic basement intervals, respectively. Figure 4 shows a Venn diagram of the number of ASVs that were shared between these lithologies. Throughout the core, 89 and 38% of the bacterial ASVs could be assigned to respectively genus and species level. Grouping of ASVs that were assigned at the same lowest possible taxonomic level yielded 709 unique taxa in total. The highest number of taxa (136) was observed at a depth of 616.18 mbsf, 85 cm above the transition between the postimpact sediments and suevite at a depth of 617.33 mbsf (Supplementary Figure 5A). The remainder of the postimpact sediments contained between 7 and 77 taxa. Samples from the suevite and granitic basement intervals contained 12–72 and 18–37 taxa, respectively (Supplementary Figure 5A).
FIGURE 4

Venn diagram showing the number of microbial taxa (assigned at the lowest identified taxonomic levels) in the three lithologies. The non-overlapping parts of the circles show the number of taxa that are unique to each lithology, whereas the overlapping parts of the circles display the number of taxa that are shared between the lithologies.
Permutational multivariate analysis of variance (PERMANOVA) revealed statistically significant differences between bacterial communities in postimpact sediments vs. suevite (P = 0.001), postimpact sediments vs. granitic basement (P = 0.027), as well as between the suevite and granitic basement (P = 0.001) (Figure 5 and Supplementary Table 3).
FIGURE 5

Canonical analysis of principal coordinates (CAP) showing the spatial distribution of the microbial communities at the lowest taxonomic level in the three crater lithologies. Also shown are the probabilities for pairwise comparisons of the crater units. Vector overlay shows the dominant significant indicator species for each lithology. For details about the ISA, see Supplementary Tables 3, 4.
Proteobacteria, Bacteroidota, Firmicutes, Actinobacteria, Deinococcota, and Bdellovibrionota comprised ∼95% of the dominant phyla in the three lithology categories (Figure 6A and Supplementary Figure 6). Proteobacteria was the most dominant phylum in all three major lithologies. In the granitic basement interval, Proteobacteria were more abundant than in the postimpact sediments and suevite (Figure 6A and Supplementary Figure 6). At class level, Gammaproteobacteria dominated over Alphaproteobateria in postimpact and suevite intervals, whereas this distribution was reversed in the granitic basement (Figures 6B,C and Supplementary Figure 6). Bacteroidota was the second most abundant phylum and was dominated by the class Bacteroidia especially in the postimpact and suevite samples (Figures 6A,B and Supplementary Figure 6). Kapabacteria (formerly known as non-photosynthetic Chlorobi-related uncultured OPB56 clade), Kryptonia, and Rhodothermia comprised a small fraction of Bacteroidota and were almost exclusively present in the suevite interval (Figure 6B and Supplementary Figure 6). Firmicutes were most abundant in the postimpact interval (Figure 6A). At class level, Bacilli comprised 99.5% in the granites and ∼80% in the postimpact and suevite samples. Clostridia represented the second most abundant class within the Firmicutes and was mainly present in the postimpact and suevite samples (Figure 6B and Supplementary Figure 6). Only a small percentage of the classes Symbiobacteria and Negativicutes were present in the postimpact and suevite intervals and Desulfobacteria were only present in the suevite samples (Figure 6B and Supplementary Figure 6). The phylum Actinobacteriota was roughly equally distributed in the three lithologies (Figure 6A). Actinobacteria comprised 95 and 80% of Actinobacteroita in the postimpact and suevite intervals, respectively, and was the only class within this phylum that could be identified in low abundance from the basement samples (Figure 6B and Supplementary Figure 6). A small contribution of the classes Thermoleophila, Rubrobacteria, Acidimicrobiia, MB-A2-108, and Coriobacteria (Actinobacteriota) were detected only in the postimpact sedimentary rocks and suevite samples (Figure 6B and Supplementary Figure 6). Lastly, the phylum Deinococcota was mainly present in the postimpact rocks and suevite intervals (Figure 6A).
FIGURE 6

Bar graphs showing the average distribution of the major phyla (A), classes (B), and orders for Proteobacteria (C) in the three lithologies: postimpact Cenozoic interval (n = 32 samples), suevite (n = 23), and granitic basement (n = 7). See Supplementary Figure 5 for details on the relative abundance of the main phyla and classes in the three lithologies.
Indicator Species Analyses
Indicator species analyses (ISA) based on a comparison of the distribution of ASVs that were grouped at the lowest taxonomic level in all three lithologies (postimpact, suevite, and granitic basement) did not render statistically significant indicator species for the postimpact section. However, pairwise ISA (postimpact sediments vs. suevite) revealed unclassified Flavobacteriaceae (Bacterioidota; ISA #160 and 182) and Halomonas (Gammaproteobacteria; Halomonaceae; #641) as significant indicator taxa for the postimpact interval (Figure 5 and Supplementary Tables 4, 5). Both groups comprised 90 and 10%, respectively of the total reads from indicator species (Supplementary Tables 4, 5).
ISA revealed five indicator species for the suevite interval, which belong to the phyla/classes Bacteroidota, Firmicutes, Deinoccota, and Alpha- plus Gammaproteobacteria (Figure 5 and Supplementary Table 4). Indicator species were from the families (ID No; percentage of taxa) env.OPS_17 (#202; ∼56%), Thermaceae (#252; ∼24%), Bacilliaceae (#277; ∼6%), Stappiaceae (#488; ∼11%), and Kapabacteriales (#208; ∼4%) (Figure 5 and Supplementary Table 4). In the granitic basement section, 14 indicator species were identified and composed of the phyla/class Actinobacteriota, Bacteroidota, Alpha- and Gammaproteobacteria, and from the domain of the Archaea (Bathyarchaeia). Dominant indicator species (> 5% from the total indicator species) were derived from the families Caulobacteriaceae (#432 and 433; ∼31%), Comamonadaceae (#563; ∼26%), Geothermatophilaceae (#50; ∼8%), Sphingomonadaceae (#539; ∼7%), and Xanthomonadaceae (#694; ∼6%) (Figure 5 and Supplementary Table 4).
Environmental Parameters
Principal component analysis (PCA) and SIMPER analysis were used to visualize and investigate the contribution of environmental parameters (Figure 2 and Supplementary Figure 1) in each lithological interval (Figure 7 and Supplementary Table 6). Analyzed environmental parameters were porosity, TOC, temperature, Fe, and S (biologically essential elements) and Mn (biologically essential trace elements). In the postimpact sedimentary rocks, S (38.4%) was the most prominent environmental contributor followed by TOC (29.2%), porosity (15.8%), and Mn (13.5%). Porosity (53.7%) appeared to be the most dominant environmental contributor in the suevite followed by Mn (27.8%) and Fe (15.6%). In the basement granite, temperature (84.2%) was the main environmental contributor followed by porosity (7.7%) and Mn (4.3%) (Figure 7 and Supplementary Table 6).
FIGURE 7

PCA plot based on SIMPER analysis of environmental parameters (porosity, TOC, temperature, Fe, S, and Mn). Vectors overlay represents each of these parameters contributing to each lithological interval.
Discussion
Impact-Induced Enhancement of Cell Abundance
Drilling of the Chicxulub impact crater allowed us to investigate the influence of the impact aftermath on the deep subsurface abundance of microorganisms through the three key lithologies of the crater, namely postimpact sedimentary rocks, the suevites (
We observed a marked increase in cell abundance at the interface between the postimpact sedimentary rocks and the suevite. An explanation for the increase in cell abundance is the preferential channeling of fluids, and thus potentially nutrients and energy supplies, between the less-permeable limestone/marl layers above the crater and the underlying higher porosity suevite, despite the relatively low TOC in the suevite compared with the postimpact sedimentary rocks. These impact-altered, elevated-porosity materials are thought to have allowed for fluid flow, leading to their hydrothermal alteration after the impact (
An Impoverished Biota in the Impact-Altered Granites
One factor influencing the low cell abundances observed in the deep subsurface granitic material could be energetic limitation. Deep crustal environments are generally deprived of electron donors for microbial growth. Unlike deep subsurface marine sediments, for example, granites would be expected to have low organic carbon availability. TOC values throughout the granitic section were less than 0.1%. Granitic rocks cannot react like deep subsurface mafic and ultramafic rocks in serpentinization reactions to produce hydrogen, another electron donor for deep life (
However, the granites in the Chicxulub core are atypical since they have been shocked and fractured during impact. These geological changes might be expected to enhance fluid flow and microbial access. The material has lower mean densities of 2.39–2.44 g/cm3 compared with typical granitic values of 2.62–2.67 g/cm3. The mean porosity is 11%, significantly higher than typical values of < 1% (
The low cell abundances measured through much of the granitic unit, despite its high impact-induced porosity and fracturing, may be caused by the impact history of the material. During impact, the granites were rapidly transported from mid-crustal depths to the near surface. Numerical modelling of the Chicxulub impact event suggests that these rocks were sourced from 8 to 10 km depth (Vermeesch and Morgan, 2008;
Enhancement of Cell Abundances at Interfaces Within the Granitic Rocks
Despite the low cell abundances observed in the bulk granitic rocks, we observed enhancements in cell abundances not only in non-granitic rocks which included preimpact rocks but also locations where suevite and impact melt rock, containing mafic gneiss lithologies, were intercalated into the granites during crater modification. This observation is a further instance of enhanced colonization linked to the geological effects of the impact. The preferential colonization of these locations may be related to the nutritionally more diverse iron and magnesium-rich mafic substrates compared with the granites, and/or they may be sites of enhanced fluid flow at lithological interfaces.
Different Communities Inhabit Different Impact Lithologies
The deep subsurface microbiome below the Chicxulub impact crater was dominated by Proteobacteria, Bacteroidota, Firmicutes, and Actinobacteria, similar to predominant microbial communities associated with deep subsurface igneous rocks such as basalt, granite, volcanic glass, and inactive hydrothermal vents (
General Potential Microbial Metabolic Traits Occurring in the Oligotrophic Chicxulub Subsurface System
Although our research was based on 16S rRNA gene analyses, it may be possible to predict the main metabolic functions of key members of the microbial communities found in the different lithologies based on their taxonomic affiliations with closely related 16S rRNA gene sequences located on sequenced genomes from cultured relatives, environmental single-cell amplified genomes, and/or environmental shotgun metagenomes available from public databases. Our sequencing data revealed that the presence of archaea was very low (less than 0.5% of total reads), and no ASVs related to methanogenic archaea were found. ASVs related to putative dissimilatory sulfate-reducing Kapabacteria were detected in the lithologies, which may outcompete methanogenic archaea for substrates (
Most of the recovered ASVs were related to metabolically versatile bacteria involved in metal, nitrogen and sulfur cycling. For example, members of the genus Paracoccus (Alphaproteobacteria; Rhodobacteriales) are capable of using organic compounds, sulfur and iron as electron donors and nitrate as the electron acceptor (
Potential Metabolic Traits Associated With Different Impact Lithologies
SIMPER analyses showed that TOC and sulfur are the most important measured quantitative geochemical parameters that separate the postimpact sedimentary rocks from the two other lithologies, with TOC and sulfur being higher in the postimpact sedimentary rocks. Possibly ancient refractory organic matter is still available as carbon and energy sources for the residing microbial communities such as chemoheterotrophic Flavobacteria (e.g., Tenacibaculum), which were identified as significant indicator species (#160, 182) for this core section. Sulfur compounds may still be available to microbial communities, notably Halomonas spp. (indicator #641) since representatives of this genus are known to utilize nitrate to oxidize thiosulfate and sulfide under anaerobic condition in deep sea sediments (Teske et al., 2000). The detection of sequences affiliated with sulfate-reducing genera (Desulfobacterota) in the suevite and granitic rocks is consistent with the isolation of sulfate-reducing bacteria from both of these layers. The presence of sulfide minerals within the Chicxulub peak ring that carry an isotopic signature of microbial sulfate-reduction has been interpreted to be a signature of sulfate reduction in the hydrothermal system that formed immediately after impact (
SIMPER analysis also shows the importance of porosity as a dominant factor in shaping the suevite communities and secondary to temperature as a factor shaping the communities in the granitic layer. This observation may be linked to the improvement of fluid flow and thus access to nutrients and energy in the higher porosity regions. As porosity is one of the key physical characteristics altered by impact, these data further corroborate the observation that the impact played a role in shaping the present-day community composition.
Microbial taxa significant for the high porosity suevite layers were closely related (99–100% sequence homology) to thermophilic microbes found in hot springs from Yellowstone Park, United States (
Comamonadaceae was the most prominent indicator family (#63) in the shattered granitic basement and its pre-impact, subvolcanic, mafic dikes. Members of this family have shown to be able to oxidize hydrogen and have been reported in hydrogen-enriched subsurfaces and ophiolitic rock sequences (
The data we acquired from the granitic rocks are similar to results collated from basaltic oceanic crust buried beneath sediments (
Deep Biosphere and Planetary Science Significance
The data on the microbiology of the present-day Chicxulub impact crater have allowed us to make the first observations of how the impactor that caused the end-Cretaceous mass extinction led to a modern deep biosphere. The microbial abundances vary with the crater arrangements of lithological and structural units and show enhancements at impact-induced interfaces. The crater units also harbor distinct microbial communities with diverse metabolic capabilities.
Surface-dwelling biota, particularly microbial communities, recover rapidly from catastrophic changes. At the site of the Chicxulub impact, a high productivity marine ecosystem was established within 30 kyr (
Finally, we note that our observations have application to the search for life on other planetary bodies, particularly Mars. The deep subsurface at Chicxulub shows that large impacts generate deep geological interfaces, favoring fluid flow, enhancing mineral diversity and thus the accessibility of nutrients and energy in the subsurface. A substantial number of large impact craters on Mars have been preserved since its early history because of the lack of plate tectonics (
Statements
Data availability statement
The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. The names of the repository/repositories and accession number(s) can be found below: NCBI BioProject, accession no: PRJNA726950.
Author contributions
MJLC, CC, AW, and LS collected and processed the offshore samples with participation of all science party members during IODP-ICDP Expedition 364. CC, BS, CW, MJLC, and KG wrote the manuscript with contributions from all other authors. CC performed cell counts and incubation the experiments. BS carried out the experiments. BS and CW carried out statistical analysis of the microbial community analysis. JL provided down-hole porosity data and petrographic analyses were performed by AW. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.
Funding
CC was supported with a NERC grant NE/P006736/1. JM was supported by NERC grant NE/P005217/1. KG, MJLC, and BS were supported by ARC Discovery project (DP180100982) and Australian and New Zealand legacy IODP funding (ANZIC 364 postcruise funding to MJLC and KG). BS was also a recipient of an Australian Post-Graduate Scholarship award for this project. SPSG, AW, GC, DK, and MW were supported by NSF collaborative grants OCE-1737351, 1736826, 1737087, 1737037, 1736951, and 1737199. PC, PK, SJG, TD, and SG were supported by BELSPO project Chicxulub and FWO projects G0A6517N, 11E6619N, and 11E6621N. The Institute for Geoscience Research are acknowledged for project support. This is University of Texas Institute for Geophysics Contribution #3645 and Center for Planetary Systems Habitability #0030. This is LPI Contribution No. 2623. LPI is operated by USRA under a cooperative agreement with the Science Mission Directorate of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration.
Acknowledgments
The research used samples and data provided by IODP. Expedition 364 was implemented by the European Consortium for Ocean Research Drilling (ECORD) and jointly funded by IODP and the International Continental Drilling Program (ICDP), with contributions and logistical support from the Yucatan State Government and Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM).
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Supplementary material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2021.668240/full#supplementary-material
Supplementary Figure 1Downcore distributions of (A) S, (B) Fe, (C) Mn (wt%), and (D) temperature (°C).
Supplementary Figure 2Cell enumerations in drilling mud mix.
Supplementary Figure 3Canonical analysis of principal coordinates (CAP) showing the spatial distribution of all 2,757 ASVs that were recovered from the core samples as well as from the various controls for contamination.
Supplementary Figure 4Bar graph showing the relative abundance of the major phyla in samples from the three lithologies and in the corresponding drilling muds.
Supplementary Figure 5Abundances of microbial taxa.
Supplementary Figure 6Relative abundance of ASVs at phylum (% of total phyla) and class (% of the corresponding phylum) levels.
Supplementary Table 1Lithology associated with the sampled core depths.
Supplementary Table 2ASV sequences shown in the major lithological intervals in the Chicxulub crater.
Supplementary Table 3Pairwise permutational multivariate analysis of variance (PERMANOVA) for the relationship between microbial community composition (Bray-Curtis similarity of standardized and square root transformed) and lithology type.
Supplementary Table 4Identity of significant indicator species in the major lithological intervals in the Chicxulub crater.
Supplementary Table 5Identity of significant indicator species in the major lithological intervals in the Chicxulub crater resulting from pairwise indicator species analysis.
Supplementary Table 6SIMPER analysis of contributions of major environmental parameters to microbial community composition.
References
1
AmendJ. P.TeskeA. (2004). Expanding frontiers in deep subsurface microbiology.Palaeogeo. Palaeoclimat. Palaeoecol.219131–155. 10.1016/b978-0-444-52019-7.50012-7
2
AmmanR. I.LudwigW.SchleiferK.-H. (1995). Phylogenetic identification and in situ detection of individual microbial cells without cultivation.Microbiol. Rev.59143–169. 10.1128/mr.59.1.143-169.1995
3
BolyenE.RideoutJ. R.DillonM. R.BokulichN. A.AbnetC. C.Al-GhalithG. A. (2019). Reproducible, interactive, scalable and extensible microbiome data science using QIIME 2.Nat. Biotechnol.37852–857.
4
BralowerT. J.CosmidisJ.HeaneyP. J.KumpL. R.MorganJ. V.HarperD. T.et al (2020). Origin of a global carbonate layer deposited in the aftermath of the Cretaceous-Paleogene boundary impact.Earth Planet. Sci. Lett.548:116476. 10.1016/j.epsl.2020.116476
5
CallahanB. J.McMurdieP. J.RosenM. J.HanA. W.JohnsonA. J. A.HolmesS. P. (2016). DADA2: high-resolution sample inference from Illumina amplicon data.Nat. Methods13:581. 10.1038/nmeth.3869
6
CaporasoJ. G.LauberC. L.WaltersW. A.Berg-LyonsD.HuntleyJ.FiererN.et al (2012). Ultra-high-throughput microbial community analysis on the Illumina HiSeq and MiSeq platforms.ISME J.61621–1624. 10.1038/ismej.2012.8
7
ChristesonG. L.GulickS. P. S.MorganJ. V.GebhardC.KringD. A.Le BerE.et al (2018). Extraordinary rocks of the Chicxulub crater peak-ring: physical property measurements from IODP/ICDP Expedition 364.Earth Planet. Sci. Lett.4951–11.
8
ClarkeK. R.GorleyR. N. (2015). PRIMER v7: User Manual/Tutorial, PRIMER-E Ltd, Plymouth.
9
CockellC. S.OsinskiG. R. (2007). Impact-induced impoverishment and transformation of a sandstone habitat for lithophytic microorganisms.Meteor. Planet. Sci.421985–1993. 10.1111/j.1945-5100.2007.tb00555.x
10
CockellC. S.LeeP.BroadyP.LimD. S. S.OsinskiG. R.ParnellJ.et al (2005). Effects of asteroid and comet impacts on habitats for lithophytic organisms - a synthesis.Meteorit. Planet. Sci.401901–1914. 10.1111/j.1945-5100.2005.tb00153.x
11
CockellC. S.LeeP.Osinski, HorneckG.BroadyP. (2002). Impact-induced microbial endolithic habitats.Meteorit. Planet. Sci.371287–1298. 10.1111/j.1945-5100.2002.tb01029.x
12
CockellC. S.VoytekM. A.GronstalA. L.FinsterK.KirshteinJ. D.HowardK.et al (2012). Impact disruption and recovery of the deep subsurface biosphere.Astrobiology12231–246. 10.1089/ast.2011.0722
13
ColwellF. S.SmithR. P. (2013). Unifying principles of the deep terrestrial and deep marine biospheres.AGU Geophys. Monogr. Ser.144355–367. 10.1029/144gm22
14
DeCáceresM.LegendreP. (2009). Associations between species and groups of sites: indices and statistical inference.Ecology903566–3574. 10.1890/08-1823.1
15
DireitoS. O. L.MareesA.RölingW. F. M. (2012). Sensitive life detection strategies for low-biomass environments: optimizing extraction of nucleic acids adsorbing to terrestrial and Mars analogue minerals.FEMS Microbiol. Ecol.81111–123. 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2012.01325.x
16
DuttaA.GuptaS. D.GuptaA.SarkarJ.RoyS.MukherjeeA.et al (2018). Exploration of deep terrestrial subsurface microbiome in Late Cretaceous Deccan traps and underlying Archean basement, India.Sci. Rep.8:17459.
17
DyksmaS.BischofK.FuchsB. M.HoffmannK.MeierD.MeyerdierksA.et al (2016). Ubiquitous Gammaproteobacteria dominate dark carbon fixation in coastal sediments.ISME J.101939–1953. 10.1038/ismej.2015.257
18
FriedmannE. I. (1982). Endolithic microorganisms in the Antarctic cold desert.Science2151045–1053. 10.1126/science.215.4536.1045
19
FukudaA.HagiwaraH.IshimuraT.KoudukaM.IokaS.AmanoY.et al (2010). Geomicrobiological properties of ultra-deep granitic groundwater from the mizunami underground research laboratory (MIU), central Japan.Microb. Ecol.60214–225. 10.1007/s00248-010-9683-9
20
González-DomenenchC. M.Martínez-ChecaF.BéjarV.QuesadaE. (2010). Denitrification as an important taxonomic marker within thegenus Halomonas.Syst. Appl. Microbiol.3385–93. 10.1016/j.syapm.2009.12.001
21
GulickS. P. S.BartonP. J.ChristesonG. L.MorganJ. V.McDonaldM.Mendoza-CervantesK.et al (2008). Importance of pre-impact crustal structure for the asymmetry of the Chicxulub impact crater.Nat. Geosci.1131–135. 10.1038/ngeo103
22
GulickS. P. S.BralowerT.OrmoJ.HallB.GriceK.SchaeferB.et al (2019). First day of the Cenozoic.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.1619342–19351.
23
GulickS. P. S.MorganJ.MellettC. L.GreenS. L.BralowerT.ChenotE.et al (2017). “Expedition 364 summary,” in Proceedings of the International Ocean Discovery Program: Chicxulub: Drilling the K-Pg Impact Crater (Texas: IODP).
24
HouJ.SievertS. M.WangY.SeewaldJ. S.NatarajanV. P.WangF.et al (2020). Microbial succession during the transition from active to inactive stages of deep-sea hydrothermal vent sulfide chimneys.Microbiome8:102.
25
HugenholtzP.PitulleC.HershbergerK. L.PaceN. R. (1998). Novel division level bacterial diversity in a Yellowstone Hot Spring.J. Bacteriol.180366–376. 10.1128/jb.180.2.366-376.1998
26
IUGS (2007). “Defined as: ‘Polymict impact breccia with particulate matrix containing lithic and mineral clasts in all stages of shock metamorphism including cogenetic impact melt particles’: Stöffler, D., Grieve, R.A.F. (2007). Impactites 11, a proposal on behalf of the IUGS Subcommission on the systematics of metamorphic rocks,” in Metamorphic Rocks: a Classification and Glossary of Terms, Recommendations of the International Union of Geological Sciences, edsFettesD.DesmonsJ. (Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press).
27
JørgensenS. L.ZhaoR. (2016). Microbial inventory of deeply buried oceanic crust from a young ridge flank.Front. Microbiol.7:820.
28
KallmayerJ.SmithD. C.SpivackA. J.D’HondtS. (2008). New cell extraction procedure applied to deep subsurface sediments.Limnol. Oceanogr. Methods6236–245. 10.4319/lom.2008.6.236
29
KatoK.NagaosaK.KimuraH.KatsuyamaC.HamaK.KunimaruT.et al (2009). Unique distribution of deep groundwater bacteria constrained by geological setting.Environ. Microbiol. Rep.1569–574. 10.1111/j.1758-2229.2009.00087.x
30
KringD.TikooS. M.SchmiederM.RillerU.Rebolledo-VieyraM.SimpsonS. L.et al (2020). Probing the hydrothermal system of the Chicxulub impact crater.Sci. Adv.6:eaaz3053.
31
KringD. A.WhitehouseM. J.SchmiederM. (2021). Microbial sulfur isotope fractionation in the Chicxulub hydrothermal system.Astrobiology21103–114. 10.1089/ast.2020.2286
32
KumaraswamyR.SjollemaK.KuenenG.van LoosdrechtM.MuyzerG. (2006). Nitrate-dependent [Fe(II)EDTA]2- oxidation by Paracoccus ferrooxidans sp. nov., isolated from a denitrifying bioreactor.Syst. Appl. Microbiol.29276–286. 10.1016/j.syapm.2005.08.001
33
LauM. C. Y.KieftT. L.KuloyoO.Linage-AlvarezB.van HeerdenE.LindsayM. R.et al (2016). An oligotrophic deep-subsurface community dependent on syntrophy is dominated by sulfur-driven autotrophic denitrifiers.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.113E7927–E7936.
34
LeeS. J.LeeY. J.RyuN.ParkS.JeongH.LeeS. J.et al (2012). Draft genome sequence of the thermophilic bacterium Anoxybacillus kamchatkensis G10.J. Bacteriol.1946684–6685. 10.1128/jb.01877-12
35
LofiJ.PezardP.LoggiaD.GarelE.GautierS.MerryC.et al (2012). Geological discontinuities, main flow path and chemical alteration in a marly hill prone to slope instability: assessment from petrophysical measurements and borehole image analysis.Hydrol. Process.262071–2084. 10.1002/hyp.7997
36
LoweryC. M.BralowerT. J.OwensJ. D.Rodríguez-TovarF. J.JonesH.SmitJ.et al (2018). Rapid recovery of life at ground zero of the end-Cretaceous mass extinction.Nature558288–291.
37
MagnaboscoC.LinL.-H.DongH.BombergM.GhiorseW.Stan-LotterH.et al (2018). The biomass and biodiversity of the continental subsurface.Nat. Geosci.11707–717. 10.1038/s41561-018-0221-6
38
MartinM. (2011). Cutadapt removes adapter sequences for high-throughput sequencing reads.Embnet J.110–12. 10.14806/ej.17.1.200
39
MichalskiJ. R.NilesP. B. (2010). Deep crustal carbonate rocks exposed by meteor impact on Mars.Nat. Geosci.3751–755. 10.1038/ngeo971
40
MorganJ. V.GulickS. P. S.BralowerT. J.ChenotF.ChristesonG. L.ClaeysP.et al (2016). The formation of peak rings in large impact craters.Science354878–882.
41
MorganJ. V.GulickS.MellettC. L.GreenS. L. (2017). “Expedition 364 scientists,” in Proceedings of the International Ocean Discovery Program: Chicxulub: Drilling the K-Pg Impact Crater, (Texas: IODP).
42
NyyssönenM.HultmanJ.AhonenL.KukkonenI.LaineP.ItävaaraM.et al (2014). Taxonomically and functionally diverse microbial communities in deep crystalline rocks of the Fennoscandian shield.ISME J.8126–138. 10.1038/ismej.2013.125
43
OsinskiG. R.CockellC. S.PontefractA.SapersH. M. (2020a). The role of meteorite impacts in the origin of life.Astrobiology201121–1149. 10.1089/ast.2019.2203
44
OsinskiG. R.GrieveR. A. F.HillP. J. A.SimpsonS. L.CockellC. S.ChristesonG. L.et al (2020b). Explosive interaction of impact melt and seawater following the Chicxulub impact event.Geology48108–112. 10.1130/g46783.1
45
ParkesR. J.WebsterG.CraggB. A.WeightmanA. J.NewberryC. J.FerdelmanT. G.et al (2005). Deep sub-seafloor prokaryotes stimulated at interfaces over geological time.Nature436390–394. 10.1038/nature03796
46
PedersenK. (1997). Microbial life in deep granitic rock.FEMS Microbiol. Rev.20399–414. 10.1111/j.1574-6976.1997.tb00325.x
47
PedersenK.EkendahlK. S. (1992). Assimilation of CO2 and introduced organic compounds by bacterial communities in groundwater from southeastern Sweden deep crystalline bedrock.Microb. Ecol.231–14. 10.1007/bf00165903
48
PedregosaF.VaroquauxG.GramfortA.MichelV.ThirionB.GriselO.et al (2011). Scikit-learn: machine learning in python.J. Mach. Learn. Res.122825–2830.
49
PontefractA.OsinskiG. R.CockellC. S.MooreC. A.MooresJ. E.SouthamG. (2014). Impact-generated endolithic habitat within crystalline rocks of the Haughton impact structure, Devon Island, Canada.Astrobiology14522–533. 10.1089/ast.2013.1100
50
PurkamoL.BombergM.KietäväinenR.SalavirtaH.NyyssönenM.Nuppunen-PuputtiM.et al (2015). The keystone species of Precambrian deep bedrock biosphere belong to Burkholderiales and Clostridiales.Biogeosci. Discss.1218103–18150.
51
PurkamoL.BombergM.NyyssönenM.KukkonenI.AhonenL.KietäväinenR.et al (2013). Dissecting the deep biosphere: retrieving authentic microbial communities from packer-isolated deep crystalline bedrock fracture zones.FEMS Microb. Ecol.85324–337. 10.1111/1574-6941.12126
52
QuastC. (2013). The SILVA ribosomal RNA gene database project: improved data processing and web-based tools.Nucleic Acids Res.41D590–D596.
53
RaupD. M. (1992). Large-body impact and extinction in the Phanerozoic.Paleobiology1880–88. 10.1017/s0094837300012227
54
RempfertK. R.MillerH. M.BompardN.NothartD.MatterJ. M.KelemenP.et al (2017). Geological and geochemical controls on subsurface microbial life in the Samail Ophiolite, Oman.Front. Microbiol.8:56.
55
RobbinsS. J.HynekB. M. (2012). A new global database of Mars impact craters ≥1 km: 1. database creation, properties, and parameters.J. Geophys. Res.117:E05004.
56
SalterS. J.CoxM. J.TurekE. M.CalusS. T.CooksonW. O.MoffattM. F.et al (2014). Reagent and laboratory contamination can critically impact sequence-based microbiome analyses.BMC Biol.12:87.
57
SchaeferB.GriceK.CoolenM. J. L.SummonsR. E.CuiX.BauersachsT.et al (2020). Microbial life in the nascent Chicxulub crater (2020).Geology48328–332. 10.1130/g46799.1
58
SchulteP.AlegretL.ArenillasI.ArzJ. A.BartonP. J.BownP. R.et al (2010). The Chicxulub asteroid impact and mass extinction at the cretaceous-paleogene boundary.Science3271214–1218.
59
Sela-AdlerM.RonenZ.HerutB.AntlerG.VigderovichH.EckertW.et al (2017). Co-existence of methanogenesis and sulfate reduction with common substrates in sulfate-rich estuarine sediments.Front. Microbiol.8:766.
60
SheikC. S.ReeseB. K.TwingK. I.SylvaJ. B.GrimS. L.SchrenkM. O.et al (2018). Identification and removal of contaminant sequences from ribosomal gene databases: lessons from the census of deep life.Front. Microbiol.9:840.
61
Sherwood LollarB.VoglesongerL.LinL.-H.Lacrampe-CouloumeG.TellingJ.AbrajanoT. A.et al (2007). Hydrogeologic controls on episodic H2 release from Precambrian fractured rocks—energy for deep subsurface life on Earth and Mars.Astrobiology7971–986. 10.1089/ast.2006.0096
62
ShimizuS.AkiyamaM.IshijimaY.HamaK.KunimaruT.NaganumaT. (2006). Molecular characterization of microbial communities in fault-bordered aquifers in the Miocene formation of northernmost Japan.Geobiology4203–213. 10.1111/j.1472-4669.2006.00077.x
63
SimpsonS. L.OsinskiG. R.LongstaffeF. L.SchmiederM.KringD. A. (2020). Hydrothermal alteration associated with the Chicxulub impact crater upper peak-ring breccias.Earth Planet. Sci. Lett.547:116425. 10.1016/j.epsl.2020.116425
64
SquyresS. W.ArvidsonR. E.BellJ. F.CalefF.ClarkB. C.CohenB. A.et al (2012). Ancient impact and aqueous processes at Endeavour Crater, Mars.Science336570–576.
65
StaleyJ. T.IrgensR. L.BrennerD. J. (1987). Enhydrobacter aerosaccus gen. nov., sp. nov., a gas-vacuolated, facultatively anaerobic, heterotrophic rod.Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol.37289–291. 10.1099/00207713-37-3-289
66
TakaiK.NakamuraK.TokiT.TsunogaiU.MiyazakiM.MiyazakiJ.et al (2008). Cell proliferation at 122 °C and isotopically heavy CH4 production by a hyperthermophilic methanogen under high-pressure cultivation.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.10510949–10954. 10.1073/pnas.0712334105
67
TanikawaW.TadaiO.MoronoY.HinrichsK.-U.InagakiF. (2018). Geophysical constraints on microbial biomass in subseafloor sediments and coal seams down to 2.5 km off Shimokita Peninsula, Japan.Prog. Earth Planet. Sci.5:58.
68
TeskeA.BrinkhoffT.MuyzerG.MoserD. P.RethmeierJ.JannaschH. W. (2000). Diversity of thiosulfate-oxidizing bacteria from marine sediments and hydrothermal vents.Appl. Environ. Microbiol.663125–3133. 10.1128/aem.66.8.3125-3133.2000
69
ThielV.Garcia CostasA. M.FortneyN. W.MartinezJ. N.TankM.RodenE. E.et al (2019). “Candidatus Thermonerobacter thiotrophicus,” a non-phototrophic member of the Bacteroidetes/Chlorobi with dissimilatory sulfur metabolism in hot spring mat communities.Front. Microbiol.9:3159.
70
VermeeschP. M.MorganJ. V. (2008). Structural uplift beneath the Chicxulub impact structure.J. Geophys. Res.113:B07103.
71
WallK.CornellJ.BizzocoR. W.KelleyS. T. (2015). Biodiversity hot spot on a hot spot: novel extremophile diversity in Hawaiian fumaroles.MicrobiologyOpen4267–281. 10.1002/mbo3.236
72
WeberC. F.KingG. M. (2007). Physiological, ecological, and phylogenetic characterization of Stappia, a marine CO-Oxidizing bacterial genus.Appl. Environ. Microbiol.731266–1276. 10.1128/aem.01724-06
73
WuchterC.BanningE.MincerT. J.DrenzekN. J.CoolenM. J. L. (2013). Microbial diversity and methanogenic activity of Antrim Shale formation waters from recently fractured wells.Front. Microbiol.4:367.
74
YuL.LiuY.WangG. (2009). Identification of novel denitrifying bacteria Stenotrophomonas sp. ZZ15 and Oceanimonas sp. YC13 and application for removal of nitrate from industrial wastewater.Biodegradation20391–400. 10.1007/s10532-008-9230-2
75
ZeikusJ. G.HeggeP. W.AndersonM. A. (1979). Thermoanaerobium brockii gen. nov. and sp. nov., a new chemoorganotrophic, caldoactive, anaerobic bacterium.Arch. Microbiol.12241–48. 10.1007/bf00408044
76
ZemanekJ.CaldwellR. L. (1969). The borehole televiewer: a new logging concept for fracture location and other types of borehole inspection.J. Petroleum Technol.25762–764. 10.2118/2402-pa
77
ZhangL.KangM.XuJ.XuJ.ShuaiY.ZhouX.et al (2016). Bacterial and archaeal communities in the deep-sea sediments of inactive hydrothermal vents in the Southwest India Ridge.Sci. Rep.6:25982.
78
ZhangL.WangX.YuM.QiaoY.ZhangX. H. (2015). Genomic analysis of Luteimonas abyssi XH031(T): insights into its adaption to the subseafloor environment of South Pacific Gyre and ecological role in biogeochemical cycle.BMC Genom.16:1092.
79
ZhouZ.PanJ.WangF.GuJ.-D.LiM. (2018). Bathyarchaeota: globally distributed metabolic generalists in anoxic environments.FEMS Microbiol. Rev.42639–655. 10.1093/femsre/fuy023
Summary
Keywords
chicxulub, impact crater, deep biosphere, drilling, craters
Citation
Cockell CS, Schaefer B, Wuchter C, Coolen MJL, Grice K, Schnieders L, Morgan JV, Gulick SPS, Wittmann A, Lofi J, Christeson GL, Kring DA, Whalen MT, Bralower TJ, Osinski GR, Claeys P, Kaskes P, de Graaff SJ, Déhais T, Goderis S, Hernandez Becerra N, Nixon S and IODP-ICDP Expedition 364 Scientists (2021) Shaping of the Present-Day Deep Biosphere at Chicxulub by the Impact Catastrophe That Ended the Cretaceous. Front. Microbiol. 12:668240. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.668240
Received
15 February 2021
Accepted
10 May 2021
Published
24 June 2021
Volume
12 - 2021
Edited by
Gary M. King, Louisiana State University, United States
Reviewed by
William J. Brazelton, The University of Utah, United States; Katrina I. Twing, Weber State University, United States
Updates

Check for updates
Copyright
© 2021 Cockell, Schaefer, Wuchter, Coolen, Grice, Schnieders, Morgan, Gulick, Wittmann, Lofi, Christeson, Kring, Whalen, Bralower, Osinski, Claeys, Kaskes, de Graaff, Déhais, Goderis, Hernandez Becerra, Nixon and IODP-ICDP Expedition 364 Scientists.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Charles S. Cockell, c.s.cockell@ed.ac.ukMarco J. L. Coolen, marco.coolen@curtin.edu.au
†These authors have contributed equally to this work
This article was submitted to Terrestrial Microbiology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Microbiology
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.