Abstract
Escherichia coli is a common mastitis-causing pathogen that can disrupt the blood-milk barrier of mammals. Although Lactobacillus casei Zhang (LCZ) can alleviate mice mastitis, whether it has a prophylactic effect on E. coli-induced mastitis through intramammary infusion, as well as its underlying mechanism, remains unclear. In this study, E. coli-induced injury models of bovine mammary epithelial cells (BMECs) and mice in lactation were used to fill this research gap. In vitro tests of BMECs revealed that LCZ significantly inhibited the E. coli adhesion (p < 0.01); reduced the cell desmosome damage; increased the expression of the tight junction proteins claudin-1, claudin-4, occludin, and zonula occludens-1 (ZO-1; p < 0.01); and decreased the expression of the inflammatory cytokines tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α, interleukin (IL)-1β, and IL-6 (p < 0.01), thereby increasing trans-epithelial electric resistance (p < 0.01) and attenuating the lactate dehydrogenase release induced by E. coli (p < 0.01). In vivo tests indicated that LCZ significantly reduced the injury and histological score of mice mammary tissues in E. coli-induced mastitis (p < 0.01) by significantly promoting the expression of the tight junction proteins claudin-3, occludin, and ZO-1 (p < 0.01), which ameliorated blood-milk barrier disruption, and decreasing the expression of the inflammatory cytokines (TNF-α, IL-1β, and IL-6) in mice mammary tissue (p < 0.01). Our study suggested that LCZ counteracted the disrupted blood-milk barrier and moderated the inflammatory response in E. coli-induced injury models, indicating that LCZ can ameliorate the injury of mammary tissue in mastitis.
Introduction
Bovine mastitis is a common disease that results in enormous economic losses for dairy farms worldwide (Sathiyabarathi et al., 2016; Angelopoulou et al., 2018). Escherichia coli (E. coli) is one of the most common mastitis-causing pathogens and often causes acute mastitis with a severe inflammatory response that disturbs the blood-milk barrier. The abuse of antimicrobials in food animals has attracted public attention, and concerns relating to antimicrobial residues and anti-microbial resistance in bacteria have increased because of the increased use of antimicrobials (Lhermie et al., 2016; Muziasari et al., 2016). There is thus an urgent need to find new potential non-antimicrobials to prevent mastitis.
Lactobacillus is an important probiotic that contributes to the immunity and health of animals. Their probiotic properties play an important role in regulating gut microbiota (Igor et al., 2019), relieving intestinal diseases (Sanders et al., 2019), and enhancing body immunity (Garcia-Castilla et al., 2019) in addition to other functions (da Costa et al., 2016; Li et al., 2017). Lactobacillus is known to protect hosts against intramammary infection in both humans and cows by oral or intramammary administration (Jiménez et al., 2008; Arroyo et al., 2010; Fernández et al., 2016), but the mechanism of this protective effect remains unclear. Intramammary infusion of drugs is the most common and effective way for treating bovine mastitis in practice, and intramammary infusion of some Lactobacillus strains can effectively alleviate clinical symptoms of bovine mastitis (Ignacio et al., 2015; Pellegrino et al., 2017; Kitching et al., 2019). The clinical symptoms of mastitis in mice can be effectively alleviated through oral administration of Lactobacillus casei Zhang (LCZ; Ma et al., 2018). However, whether intramammary infusion of LCZ has a prophylactic effect on mastitis, as well as its underlying mechanism, remains unclear. Here, we studied the prophylactic effect of LCZ on E. coli-induced injury models and its mechanism using bovine mammary epithelial cells (BMECs) and mice in lactation.
Materials and Methods
Bacterial Strains
Lactobacillus casei Zhang (provided by Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Key Laboratory of Dairy Biotechnology and Engineering, Inner Mongolia, China) was grown in de Man, Rogosa, and Sharpe (MRS) broth (Solarbio, Beijing, China) at 37°C under microaerophilic conditions. The isolate of E. coli ATCC 25922 (provided by China General Microbiological Culture Collection Center, Beijing, China) was incubated in tryptone soya broth (Solarbio, Beijing, China) at 37°C. In all treatments, E. coli and LCZ were plated on tryptone soya agar (TSA, Solarbio, Beijing, China) and MRS agar (Solarbio, Beijing, China), respectively, to count colony-forming unit (CFU).
Cell Culture
Bovine mammary epithelial cells (provided by Yangzhou University, College of Animal Science and Technology Feed Engineering Technology Research Center, Yangzhou, China) were cultivated in Dulbecco’s modified eagle medium (DMEM)-F12 medium (ThermoFisher, Waltham, MA, United States) containing 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS; ThermoFisher), 1% penicillin and streptomycin (Beyotime, Shanghai, China), 15 ng/ml epidermal growth factor (PeproTech, Cranbury, NJ, United States), 1% non-essential amino acids (ThermoFisher), and 1% insulin-transferrin-selenium (ITS, ThermoFisher) at 37°C in 5% CO2 and 95% relative humidity. Briefly, BMECs (5 × 105) were seeded onto six-well cell culture plates in the aforementioned medium for 48 h and were then cultured in DMEM-F12 medium with 5% FBS, 1% penicillin and streptomycin, and 1% ITS for 72 h to ensure that a polarized and differentiated state was achieved. Before treatments, the medium was changed into DMEM-F12 alone, and both E. coli and LCZ were diluted by DMEM-F12. Cells were randomly treated under four conditions, and the dose of two bacteria was decided according to pretest: (1) Control group (DMEM alone); (2) 1 × 103 CFU E. coli treatment for 5 h (E. coli group); (3) 1 × 105 CFU LCZ pretreatment for 3 h, followed by 1 × 103 CFU E. coli treatment for 5 h (LCZ + E. coli group); and (4) 1 × 105 CFU LCZ treatment for 3 h (LCZ group). 5 h after LCZ treatment, cells were washed with phosphate buffer saline (PBS, ThermoFisher) and then incubated with E. coli. All cell experiments were repeated three times, and each experiment was performed in triplicate.
Cell Death Assay
Cell death was measured using the lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) method through a CytoTox 96 cytotoxicity assay (Solarbio, Beijing, China) based on the manufacturer’s manual. In detail, the cell culture supernatant was used to detect the amount of LDH release.
Adhesion Assay
The BMECs were washed with PBS for three times, and 1 ml triton-X-100 (0.5% v/v, Solarbio, Beijing, China) was added to each well after incubation with LCZ or E. coli. The cells were scraped off, and the lysate was transferred to a centrifugal tube after 10 min of stabilization at room temperature. E. coli and LCZ were plated on TSA and MRS agar, respectively, to count CFU.
Trans-Epithelial Electric Resistance
Bovine mammary epithelial cells were seeded on transwell inserts (membrane area: 0.33 cm2, pore size: 0.4 μm, Corning, NY, United States), cultivated for 120 h as described previously, and measured TEER daily. When cells reached a polarized and differentiated state which means that TEER reached 400 Ω cm2, different treatments were applied. TEER was measured for three times per well using a Millicell Electrical Resistance System-2 (Millipore, MA, United States) and expressed as Ω cm2 after subtracting the filter resistance value. The results of TEER were defined as the TEER change (TEER of monolayer cells after treatments – TEER of monolayer cells before treatments).
Animals
CD-1 mice (8–10 days in lactation; 50 ± 5 g; obtained from SPF Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Beijing, China) were reared at 25°C and fed with enough food and water. Twenty mice were randomly allocated to the four treatments, and the dose of two bacteria was decided according to pretest: (1) Control group (PBS alone); (2) 1 × 103 CFU E. coli treatment for 12 h (E. coli group); (3) 1 × 105 CFU LCZ pre-infusion for 24 h, followed by 1 × 103 CFU E. coli treatment for 12 h (LCZ + E. coli group); and (4) 1 × 105 CFU LCZ treatment for 24 h (LCZ group). Five mice were used as replicates in each group. Mice were anesthetized with Zoletil 50 (Virbac, Barneveld, France), and all treatments were conducted through intramammary infusion via the teat canal of the fourth teat. E. coli was injected 24 h after LCZ pretreatment. After treatments, the mice were killed to collect mammary tissues. All animal feeding and experimental protocols in this study were approved by the animal ethics committee of the National Institutes of Health Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals (GB14925-2010, China).
Histopathology
The general condition of each mammary tissue of the mice was assessed by clinical scoring. The clinical score ranked from 1 to 5, with higher scores corresponding to greater degrees of tissue damage. Specifically, 1 indicated no damage, 2 indicated slight redness, 3 indicated redness and slight bleeding, 4 indicated redness and bleeding, and 5 indicated redness and obvious bleeding.
The mammary tissues were fixed in 4% cell tissue fixative (Solarbio) immediately after the mice were killed. To evaluate histological changes, hematoxylin-eosin was used to stain tissue samples, and a microscope was used to observe the tissues. The semi-quantitative scoring was performed using a histological score based on the following criteria. The histological score ranged from 1 to 5, and higher scores corresponded to greater degrees of tissue damage. Specifically, 1 indicated the absence of histological features (i.e., necrosis, neutrophils, and lymphocytes), 2 indicated minimal histological features (i.e., individual neutrophils), 3 indicated mild histological features (i.e., a small amount of neutrophils), 4 indicated moderate histological characteristics (i.e., many neutrophils and slight damage to glandular structure), and 5 indicated severe histological characteristics (i.e., a large number of neutrophils and severe damage to glandular structure). Both clinical scoring and histological scoring were made by experienced veterinary pathologists who were blinded to the treatments.
Immunofluorescence
Two mammary tissue blocks (0.3 cm3) were immediately sampled after the mice were killed and then stored in liquid nitrogen for tissue immunofluorescence to localized tight junction proteins. Briefly, cryosections of mammary tissues were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde and then were incubated with 5% bovine serum albumin (BSA; ThermoFisher) at 25°C. After incubation using primary antibodies (zonula occludins-1 (ZO-1), claudin-3, and occludin, 1:2,000 dilution, Abcam, Cambridge, United Kingdom) at 4°C for 12 h, tissues were washed with PBS, and secondary antibodies (1:1,000 dilution, CoWin Biosciences, Beijing, China) were added and incubated at 25°C for 1 h. Blanks were treated in the same way except that the tissues were not incubated with primary antibodies. After washing with PBS and staining with 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI), a fluorescence microscope was used to obtain images.
Transmission Electron Microscope Analysis
Two mammary gland tissue blocks (10 mm3) collected from each mouse were immediately stored in centrifuge tubes and filled with electron microscope fixative (Servicebio, Wuhan, China) for transmission electron microscopy (TEM; Gang et al., 2019). Cell samples were harvested and fixed with electron microscope fixative for TEM. Both tissue and cell samples were dehydrated with ethanol at 25°C for 15 min per step. Cells were then placed into epoxy resin acetone mixtures (Solarbio) for 2 h and then into pure resin (Solarbio) overnight at 37°C. Next, an ultramicrotome (Leica EM, Wetzlar, Germany) was used to cut ultra-thin sections, which were stained by uranyl acetate and lead citrate (1%, Solarbio) and detected using TEM (Hitachi H-7650, Tokyo, Japan).
Western Blot Analysis
Both BMECs and mammary tissues were collected after treatment, and protein content was determined using a BCA assay kit (Beyotime). Each sample was separated by 12% sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gels, transferred onto polyvinylidene fluoride membranes (Bio-Rad, CA, Hercules, United States), and blocked by 5% BSA for 12 h at 4°C. The membranes were cultured with primary antibodies (zonula occludins-1 (ZO-1), claudin-1, claudin-4, and occludin for BMECs, 1:500 dilution, Bioss Antibodies, Beijing, China; ZO-1, claudin-3, and occludin for mice mammary tissue, 1:2,000 dilution, Abcam, Cambridge, United Kingdom) at 25°C for 3 h. After washing with Tris-buffered saline with tween (NobleRyder, Beijing, China), the membranes were incubated with secondary antibodies (1:1,000 dilution, CoWin Biosciences) at 25°C for 1 h. Protein bands were visualized by a Beyo Enhanced Chemiluminescence reagent kit (Solarbio). MultiImager (Bio-Rad Gel Doc XR) and ImageJ software (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, United States) were used to detect protein expression.
Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay
Tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α, IL-6, and IL-1β expression in both BMECs and mammary tissues of mice were detected using bovine (DG Biotech, Beijing, China) and mouse ELISA kits (ThermoFisher), respectively. In detail, the cell medium was moved to a sterile centrifuge tube and centrifuged at 4°C for 10 min at 1000 × g for further test. Each tissue sample was added with 2 ml of RIPA tissue lysate (Solarbio), the cracked samples were centrifuged at 10,000–14,000 g for 4 min, and the supernatant was removed for further test.
Statistical Analysis
All data were analyzed in SAS 9.2 (SAS Institute Inc., NYC, United States) and expressed as mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM). Graphs were produced with Origin 8.0 (Origin Lab, Northampton, MA, United States). Variance was analyzed using one-way ANOVA in SAS 9.2, followed by multiple comparisons using the Tukey method. The threshold for statistical significance was p < 0.01.
Results
In vitro Pre-incubation With LCZ Reduces E. coli-Induced Damage of BMECs
Escherichia coli caused a significantly higher LDH release compared with the other groups (p < 0.01); there were no significant differences between the Control, LCZ + E. coli, and LCZ groups (Figure 1). TEER change in BMECs treated with E. coli was negative and significantly different from the other groups (p < 0.01). Specifically, although TEER change was significantly higher in the LCZ + E. coli group than in the Control group (p < 0.01), it was significantly less negative compared with the E. coli group (p < 0.01; Figure 2). The desmosome structure in the E. coli group was severely damaged and blurred as illustrated by TEM, whereas LCZ pretreatment noticeably alleviated desmosome structure damage. Moreover, the desmosome structure in the LCZ group was clearly visible, and no clear difference was detected compared with the Control group (Figure 3).
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
LCZ pretreatment significantly inhibited the E. coli adhesion rate to monolayer BMECs (p < 0.01), and the adhesion ability of LCZ to monolayer BMECs was significantly lower compared with E. coli (p < 0.01; Figure 4). The expression of claudin-1, claudin-4, occludin, and ZO-1 in BMECs was significantly decreased in the E. coli group compared with the other groups (p = 0.02; Figure 5), and LCZ pretreatment significantly increased the expression of these four proteins (p = 0.02). Moreover, ZO-1 expression in the LCZ group was significantly increased (p = 0.02); there were no significant differences in the expression of the other three proteins between the LCZ group and the Control group. The effect of LCZ on the expression of inflammatory cytokines in BMECs is shown in Figure 6. The expression of TNF-α, IL-6, and IL-β was significantly higher in the E. coli group than in the other groups (p < 0.01); LCZ pretreatment inhibited the expression of these cytokines (p < 0.01).
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
In vivo Pre-infusion With LCZ Reduces E. coli-Induced Injury in Mice Mammary Tissue
No redness or swelling was detected in the mammary tissues in the Control, LCZ + E. coli, and LCZ groups, and there was no significant difference in the injury score among these groups (Figure 7). However, visible redness and bleeding were observed in the E. coli group, and LCZ pretreatment significantly reduced the injury score (p < 0.01). No visible pathological damage was observed in the mammary acinar structure of the mice in the Control and LCZ groups; by contrast, E. coli caused remarkable pathological injury and led to the presence of a large number of neutrophils in the alveolar lumen (Figure 8). LCZ pretreatment significantly alleviated mammary acinar structure damage and the number of neutrophils compared with the E. coli group; furthermore, a significant decrease in the histological score was observed (p < 0.01). The tight junction structure in the E. coli group was severely damaged and blurred under TEM (Figure 9) but was visibly alleviated in the LCZ + E. coli group. The tight junction structure in the LCZ group was apparent, and there were no obvious differences between the LCZ group and the Control group.
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9
The tight junction proteins claudin-3, occludin, and ZO-1 in mice mammary tissue were clearly localized on the interstitial side, as well as in the intercellular regions of the neighboring alveolar epithelial cells before E. coli infusion (Control group); nevertheless, the localization of these three proteins was disturbed by E. coli. In addition, LCZ pretreatment greatly promoted the positive reactions of these proteins in the alveolar lumen compared with the E. coli group. These three proteins were all localized on the interstitial side, and no differences were noted between the LCZ and Control groups (Figures 10–12). Tight junction protein expression in mice mammary tissues was significantly decreased in the E. coli group relative to the other groups (p < 0.01; Figure 13). LCZ pretreatment significantly increased the expression of these proteins compared with the E. coli group (p < 0.01), and no significant differences were noted between the LCZ and Control groups. The effect of LCZ on inflammatory cytokine expression in mice mammary tissue is shown in Figure 14. TNF-α, IL-6, and IL-1β expressions were significantly increased by E. coli (p < 0.01), whereas LCZ pretreatment significantly decreased the expression of these cytokines (p < 0.01). IL-1β expression was significantly higher in the LCZ group than in the Control group (p < 0.01), and no significant differences were detected in IL-6 and TNF-α expressions.
Figure 10
Figure 11
Figure 12
Figure 13
Figure 14
Discussion
Lactobacillus casei Zhang has a promising prophylactic effect against several inflammatory diseases (Wang et al., 2013, 2016; Zhang et al., 2017), and recent research has shown that LCZ can have a prophylactic effect against mastitis in mice when administered orally (Ma et al., 2018). Here, both in vitro and in vivo tests were conducted to characterize the prophylactic effect of LCZ on E. coli-stimulated BMECs and mice mammary injury; its potential mechanism was also studied. In dairy farming, the treatment of mastitis is mainly carried out through milk duct infusion; therefore, in this study, intramammary infusion instead of oral infusion was chosen during in vivo test. This study revealed that LCZ pretreatment could dramatically counteract BMEC injury induced by E. coli, a finding that is consistent with previous studies (Chen et al., 2017; Dinić et al., 2017; Wang et al., 2018a). The prophylactic effect of LCZ on E. coli-induced mastitis in mice by intramammary infusion was also explored in this study. The result showed that pre-infusion of LCZ could reduce the number of neutrophils and relieve damage to mammary tissue, which was also consistent with the results of in vitro test, which shows that LCZ pretreatment decreases the release of LDH of BMECs. Recent studies have shown that intramammary infusion of Lactococcus does not cause inflammatory reactions; after intramammary infusion of Lactococcus, immune proteins acute phase proteins haptoglobin and milk amyloid A were significantly expressed in the mammary glands of healthy Holstein cows (Pyorala, 2003; Eckersall et al., 2006; Crispie et al., 2008), and no major bovine mastitis pathogen was detected (Pellegrino et al., 2017). Therefore, findings of this study indicate that LCZ can prevent bovine mastitis, which might be related to its ability to promote the production of lactic acid, antibacterial peptides, and other beneficial substances (Lebeer et al., 2018).
Several studies have indicated that pro-inflammatory cytokines play an important regulatory role in the disorder of tight junctions induced by inflammation (Schulzke et al., 2009; Zhang et al., 2018). The integrity of the blood-milk barrier could protect mammary epithelial cells from infection by pathogens and thus prevent an inflammatory reaction. TNF-α and IL-1β disrupt tight junctions, and IL-6 is associated with host defense against inflammatory disease (Rochfort et al., 2014; Cheng et al., 2018). In this study, the expression of TNF-α, IL-6, and IL-1β caused by E. coli decrease significantly when pretreated with LCZ, which is consistent with the results of Wu et al. (2016) showing that Lactobacillus pretreatment effectively reduce the upregulation of TNF-α, IL-1β, and IL-8 mRNA expressions induced by E. coli. This may because that LCZ pretreatment may promote an early alert state of the immune system which could improve the alertness of the host defensive system, thus stopping a subsequent strong infection rapidly (Kingma et al., 2011). Furthermore, the previous studies have shown that the inflammatory response can decrease acinar tight junction protein expression (Hartwig et al., 2003; Oguro et al., 2011) and affect barrier function. In vitro test showed that LCZ could significantly inhibit inflammatory cytokine expression by inhibiting E. coli infection; we thus also measured inflammatory cytokine expression in mice mammary tissue and got the same result. Therefore, this study indicates that the prophylactic effect of LCZ may be achieved by increase the alert state increasing a little bit the levels of immune regulators, which allows to decrease the expression of inflammatory cytokines in both BMECs and mice mammary tissue caused by E. coli. Besides, in exploring the underlying mechanism of the prophylactic effect of LCZ against E. coli-treated cells and blood-milk barrier damage, this study found that LCZ pretreatment could significantly reduce the adhesion rate of E. coli to BMECs. These results are consistent with recent studies showing that Lactobacillus could significantly inhibit the adhesion of E. coli to Caco-2 (Behbahani et al., 2019) and HT-29 cells (Dhanani and Bagchi, 2013). Therefore, the prophylactic effect of LCZ on BMECs could be mediated by the inhibition of E. coli adhesion, so that the expression of cytokines was decreased lower, which lead to E. coli infection decrease.
Mammary epithelial cells form the blood-milk barrier through special connecting structures, such as tight junctions. Several mammary pathogenic bacteria, including E. coli, cause mastitis. The blood-milk barrier is leaky in bovine mastitis, which permits molecules to cross the barrier and occur in milk (Nguyen and Neville, 1998; Lehmann et al., 2013). Specifically, E. coli can damage tight junction structure, thereby increasing the permeability of the epithelial barrier and causing pathogens in the acinus to enter mammary tissue (Bruewer et al., 2006; Shen and Turner, 2006). TEER reflects the integrity of the monolayer cells, the ion conductance of the pathway adjacent to monolayer epithelial cells, and the pore size of tight junctions (Flavia et al., 2006). This study showed that LCZ pretreatment could significantly mitigate the reduction in TEER caused by E. coli. This result corroborated the findings of several previous studies showing that Lactobacillus could significantly promote the TEER of Caco-2 and NCM460 cells (Horibe et al., 1997; Liu et al., 2010; Qiu et al., 2017). Accordingly, this study proposes that LCZ enhances the densification of monolayer BMECs. The same conclusion was obtained based on TEM observations of the desmosome structure between cells. Furthermore, tight junction proteins are known to maintain the structural integrity of tight junctions, which is necessary for the normal function of the blood-milk barrier (Shen et al., 2006; Guo et al., 2019). This study indicates that LCZ pretreatment could significantly increase tight junction protein expression in BMECs, which is consistent with the TEER results. These results are also consistent with those of Karczewski et al. (2010) and Wang et al. (2018b) showing that Lactobacillus plantarum could effectively promote occludin and ZO-1 expression in human intestinal cells as well as claudin-1 in IPEC-J2 cells. Moreover, Johnson et al. (2008) found that Lactobacillus rhamnosus could effectively promote claudin-1 and ZO-1 expression in T84 epithelial cells. The results of the Western blot, immunofluorescence, and the TEM in vivo test also showed that pre-infusion of LCZ could enhance the tight junction structure and upregulate tight junction protein expression in the mammary alveolar lumen in mice. This result is consistent with our in vitro test as well as previous studies, including Mennigen et al. (2009), Karczewski et al. (2010), and Patel et al. (2012), indicating that Lactobacillus can significantly promote the tightness of the intestinal epithelial barrier in both mice and humans by increasing tight junction protein expression. Consequently, this study found that LCZ could promote the integrity of the epithelial barrier via increasing tight junction protein expression in both BMECs and mice mammary tissues, and lead to lower expression of inflammatory cytokines, thereby alleviating damage to mammary tissue.
Conclusion
This study shows that LCZ has prophylactic effect on E. coli-induced injury of mammary gland. It could counteract the blood-milk barrier disruption and decrease the inflammatory response, which mechanism included the promotion of tight junction protein expression and the inhibition of E. coli infection in both BMECs and mice mammary tissue. This study provides a new perspective on the protective effect of LCZ as well as an effective prophylactic agent for preserving blood-milk barrier function during E. coli-induced mastitis.
Statements
Data availability statement
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary material, and further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.
Ethics statement
The animal study was reviewed and approved by the National Institutes of Health Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals (GB14925-2010, China).
Author contributions
YZ, GL, and SL conceived and designed the experiments. YZ performed the experiments, analyzed the data, and wrote the manuscript. GL, WW, and SL reviewed and edited the manuscript. GL, WW, YW, ZC, HY, and SL provided guidance for the experiments. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.
Funding
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31772628).
Acknowledgments
We thank the Key Laboratory of Dairy Biotechnology and Engineering, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University for providing Strain Lactobacillus casei Zhang, and the College of Animal Science and Technology Feed Engineering Technology Research Center, Yangzhou University for providing BMECs.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
References
1
AngelopoulouA.FieldD.RyanC. A.StantonC.HillC.RossR. P. (2018). The microbiology and treatment of human mastitis. Med. Microbiol. Immunol.207, 1–12. doi: 10.1007/s00430-017-0532-z
2
ArroyoR.MartínV. M. A.JiménezE. F. L.RodríguezJ. M. (2010). Treatment of infectious mastitis during lactation: antibiotics versus oral administration of lactobacilli isolated from breast milk. Clin. Infect. Dis.50, 1551–1558. doi: 10.1086/652763
3
BehbahaniB. A.NoshadM.FalahF. (2019). Inhibition of Escherichia coli adhesion to human intestinal Caco-2 cells by probiotic candidate Lactobacillus plantarum strain L15. Microb. Pathog.136, 103677–103684. doi: 10.1016/j.micpath.2019.103677
4
BruewerM.SamarinS.NusratA. (2006). Inflammatory bowel disease and the apical junctional complex. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci.1072, 242–252. doi: 10.1196/annals.1326.017
5
ChenZ.-Y.HsiehY.-M.HuangC.-C.TsaiC.-C. (2017). Inhibitory effects of probiotic Lactobacillus on the growth of human colonic carcinoma cell line HT-29. Molecules22:107. doi: 10.3390/molecules22010107
6
ChengY.DesseS.MartinezA.WorthenR. J.JopeR. S.BeurelE. (2018). TNFα disrupts blood brain barrier integrity to maintain prolonged depressive-like behavior in mice. Brain Behav. Immun.69, 556–567. doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2018.02.003
7
CrispieF.Alonso-GómezM.O’LoughlinC.KlostermannK.FlynnJ.ArkinsS.et al. (2008). Intramammary infusion of a live culture for treatment of bovine mastitis: effect of live lactococci on the mammary immune response. J. Dairy Res.75, 374–384. doi: 10.1017/S0022029908003385
8
da CostaW. K. A.BrandãoL. R.MartinoM. E.GarciaE. F.AlvesA. F.de SouzaE. L.et al. (2016). Qualification of tropical fruit-derived Lactobacillus plantarum strains as potential probiotics acting on blood glucose and total cholesterol levels in Wistar rats. Food Res. Int.8, 109–117. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2018.08.035
9
DhananiA. S.BagchiT. (2013). Lactobacillus plantarum CS24.2 prevents Escherichia coli adhesion to HT-29 cells and also down-regulates enteropathogen-induced tumor necrosis factor-alpha and interleukin-8 expression. Microbiol. Immunol.57, 309–315. doi: 10.1111/1348-0421.12038
10
DinićM.LukićJ.DjokićJ.MilenkovićM.StrahinićI.GolićG.et al. (2017). Lactobacillus fermentum postbiotic-induced autophagy as potential approach for treatment of acetaminophen hepatotoxicity. Front. Microbiol.8:594. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.00594
11
EckersallP. D.YoungF. J.NolanA. M.KnightC. H.McCombC.WaterstonM. M.et al. (2006). Acute phase proteins in bovine milk in an experimental model of Staphylococcus aureus subclinical mastitis. J. Dairy Sci.89, 1488–1501. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(06)72216-0
12
FernándezL.CárdenasN.ArroyoR.ManzanoS.JiménezE.MartínV.et al. (2016). Prevention of infectious mastitis by oral administration of Lactobacillus salivarius PS2 during late pregnancy. Clin. Infect. Dis.62, 568–573. doi: 10.1093/cid/civ974
13
FlaviaZ.Anne-FrançoiseB.GiovannaB.JeanC.AriannaC.RosaC.et al. (2006). An inter-laboratory study to evaluate the effects of medium composition on the differentiation and barrier function of Caco-2 cell lines. Altern. Lab. Anim33, 603–618. doi: 10.1177/026119290503300618
14
GangL.YinJ.HanB.BarkemaH. W.ShahidM.De BuckJ.et al. (2019). Adherent/invasive capacities of bovine-associated Aerococcus viridans contribute to pathogenesis of acute mastitis in a murine model. Vet. Microbiol.230, 202–211. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2019.02.016
15
Garcia-CastillaV.KomatsuR.CluaP.IndoY.TakagiM.SalvaS.et al. (2019). Evaluation of the immunomodulatory activities of the probiotic strain Lactobacillus fermentum UCO-979C. Front. Immunol.10:1376. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.01376
16
GuoW.LiuB.HuG.KanX.LiY.GongQ.et al. (2019). Vanillin protects the blood-milk barrier and inhibits the inflammatory response in LPS-induced mastitis in mice. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol.365, 9–18. doi: 10.1016/j.taap.2018.12.022
17
HartwigW.KarenW. B.JörgK.GesaR. E.StefanL.StefanH.et al. (2003). Localization of claudin-3 in tight junctions of the blood-brain barrier is selectively lost during experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis and human glioblastoma multiforme. Acta Neuropathol.105, 586–592. doi: 10.1007/s00401-003-0688-z
18
HoribeY.HosoyaK.KimK.-J.OgisoT.LeeV. H. L. (1997). Polar solute transport across the pigmented rabbit conjunctiva: size dependence and the influence of 8-bromo cyclic adenosine monophosphate. Pharm. Res.14, 1246–1251. doi: 10.1023/A:1012123411343
19
IgnacioF.PellegrinoM.GiraudoJ.Nader-MaciasM. E.CristinaB. (2015). Evaluation of beneficial lactic acid bacteria strains as a potential probiotic for the prevention of bovine mastitis. Front. Immunol.6, 231–239. doi: 10.3389/conf.fimmu.2015.05.00231
20
IgorS.SharonM. D.ZdislavaS.VeraN. B.EvaV.VeraJ.et al. (2019). Colonization of germ-free piglets with commensal Lactobacillus amylovorus, Lactobacillus mucosae and probiotic E. coli Nissle 1917 and their interference with Salmonella typhimurium. Microorganisms7, 273–291. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms7080273
21
JiménezE.FernándezL.MaldonadoA.MartínR.OlivaresM.et al. (2008). Oral administration of Lactobacillus strains isolated from breast milk as an alternative for the treatment of infectious mastitis during lactation. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.74, 4650–4655. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02599-07
22
JohnsonH. K. C.DonatoK. A.ShenT. G.GordanpourM.ShermanP. M. (2008). Lactobacillus rhamnosus strain GG prevents enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli O157: H7-induced changes in epithelial barrier function. Infect. Immun.76, 1340–1348. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00778-07
23
KingmaS. D.LiN.SunF.ValladaresR. B.NeuJ.LorcaG. L. (2011). Lactobacillus johnsonii N6.2 stimulates the innate immune response through toll-like receptor 9 in Caco-2 cells and increases intestinal crypt Paneth cell number in biobreeding diabetes-prone rats. J. Nutr.141, 102–1028. doi: 10.3945/jn.110.135517
24
KarczewskiJ.TroostF. J.KoningsI.DekkerJ.WellsJ. M. (2010). Regulation of human epithelial tight junction proteins by Lactobacillus plantarum in vivo and protective effects on the epithelial barrier. Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol.298, G851–G859. doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.00327.2009
25
KitchingM.MathurH.FlynnJ.ByrneN.DillonP.SayersR.et al. (2019). A live bio-therapeutic for mastitis, containing Lactococcus lactis DPC3147 with comparable efficacy to antibiotic treatment. Front. Microbiol.10:2220. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.02220
26
LhermieG.GrohnY. T.RaboissonD. (2016). Addressing antimicrobial resistance: an overview of priority actions to prevent suboptimal antimicrobial use in food-animal production. Front. Microbiol.7:2114. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.02114
27
LebeerS.PeterA. M.MarcoM. L.Van PijkerenJ.-P.MotherwayM. O.HillC.et al. (2018). Identification of probiotic effector molecules: present state and future perspectives. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol.49, 217–223. doi: 10.1016/j.copbio.2017.10.007
28
LehmannM.WellnitzO.BruckmaierR. M. (2013). Concomitant lipopolysaccharide-induced transfer of blood-derived components including immunoglobulins into milk. J. Dairy Sci.96, 889–896. doi: 10.3168/jds.2012-5410
29
LiX.-X.WangH.DuX.-X.YuW.-N.JiangJ.-W.et al. (2017). Lactobacilli inhibit cervical cancer cell migration in vitro and reduce tumor burden in vivo through upregulation of E-cadherin. Oncol. Rep.38, 1561–1568. doi: 10.3892/or.2017.5791
30
LiuZ.-H.ShenT.-Y.ZhangP.MaY.-L.MoyerM. P.QinH.-L. (2010). Protective effects of Lactobacillus plantarum against epithelial barrier dysfunction of human colon cell line NCM460. World J. Gastroenterol.16, 5759–5766. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v16.i45.5759
31
MaC.SunZ.ZengB.HuangS.ZhaoJ.ZhangY.et al. (2018). Cow-to-mouse fecal transplantations suggest intestinal microbiome as one cause of mastitis. Microbiome6, 200–217. doi: 10.1186/s40168-018-0578-1
32
MennigenR.NolteK.RijckenE.UtechM.LoefflerB.SenningerN.et al. (2009). Probiotic mixture VSL#3 protects the epithelial barrier by maintaining tight junction protein expression and preventing apoptosis in a murine model of colitis. Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol.296, 1140–1149. doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.90534.2008
33
MuziasariW. I.PitkänenL. K.SørumH.StedtfeldR. D.TiedjeJ. M.MarkoV. (2016). The resistome of farmed fish feces contributes to the enrichment of antibiotic resistance genes in sediments below Baltic Sea fish farms. Front. Microbiol.7:2137. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.02137
34
NguyenD. A.NevilleM. C. (1998). Tight junction regulation in the mammary gland. J. Mammary Gland Biol. Neoplasia3, 233–246. doi: 10.1023/A:1018707309361
35
OguroM.KoikeM.UenoT.AsaokaD.MoriH.NagaharaA.et al. (2011). Dissociation and dispersion of claudin-3 from the tight junction could be one of the most sensitive indicators of reflux esophagitis in a rat model of the disease. J. Gastroenterol.46, 629–638. doi: 10.1007/s00535-011-0390-1
36
PatelR. M.MyersL. S.KurundkarA. R.MaheshwariA.NusratA.LinP. W. (2012). Probiotic bacteria induce maturation of intestinal claudin 3 expression and barrier function. Am. J. Pathol.180, 626–635. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2011.10.025
37
PellegrinoM.BerardoN.GiraudoJ.Nader-MacíasM. E. F.BogniC. (2017). Bovine mastitis prevention: humoral and cellular response of dairy cows inoculated with lactic acid bacteria at the dry-off period. Benefic. Microbes8, 589–596. doi: 10.3920/BM2016.0194
38
PyoralaS. (2003). Indicators of inflammation in the diagnosis of mastitis. Vet. Res.34, 565–578. doi: 10.1051/vetres:2003026
39
QiuY.-Q.JiangZ.-Y.HuS.-L.WangL.MaX.YangX.-Y. (2017). Lactobacillus plantarum enhanced IL-22 production in natural killer (NK) cells that protect the integrity of intestinal epithelial cell barrier damaged by enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli. Int. J. Mol. Sci.18, 2409–2414. doi: 10.3390/ijms18112409
40
RochfortK. D.CollinsL. E.MurphyR. P.CumminsP. M.KovalM. (2014). Downregulation of blood-brain barrier phenotype by proinflammatory cytokines involves NADPH oxidase-dependent ROS generation: consequences for interendothelial adherens and tight junctions. PLoS One9:e101815. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0101815
41
SandersM. E.MerensteinD. J.ReidG.GibsonG. R.RastallR. A. (2019). Probiotics and prebiotics in intestinal health and disease: from biology to the clinic. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol.16, 1–13. doi: 10.1038/s41575-019-0173-3
42
SathiyabarathiM.JeyakumarS.ManimaranA.JayaprakashG.HeartwinA.PushpadassM.et al. (2016). Infrared thermography: a potential noninvasive tool to monitor udder health status in dairy cows. Vet. World9, 1075–1081. doi: 10.14202/vetworld.2016.1075-1081
43
SchulzkeJ. D.PloegerS.AmashehM.FrommA.ZeissigS.TroegerH.et al. (2009). Epithelial tight junctions in intestinal inflammation. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci.1165, 294–300. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.04062.x
44
ShenL.TurnerJ. R. (2006). Role of epithelial cells in initiation and propagation of intestinal inflammation. Eliminating the static: tight junction dynamics exposed. Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol.290, G577–G582. doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.00439.2005
45
ShenL.BlackE. D.WitkowskiE. D.LencerW. I.GuerrieroV.SchneebergerE. E.et al. (2006). Myosin light chain phosphorylation regulates barrier function by remodeling tight junction structure. J. Cell Sci.119, 2095–2106. doi: 10.1242/jcs.02915
46
WangB.LiJ.WangS.HaoY.ZhaoX.ChenJ. (2018a). Lactobacillus plantarum ameliorates tumour necrosis factor-induced bacterial translocation in Caco-2 cells by regulation of TLR4 expression. J. Med. Microbiol.67, 982–991. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.000762
47
WangJ.JiH.WangS.LiuH.ZhangW.ZhanD.et al. (2018b). Probiotic Lactobacillus plantarum promotes intestinal barrier function by strengthening the epithelium and modulating gut microbiota. Front. Microbiol.9:1953. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.01953
48
WangY.LiY.XieJ.ZhangY.WangJ.SunX.et al. (2013). Protective effects of probiotic Lactobacillus casei Zhang against endotoxin-and d-galactosamine-induced liver injury in rats via anti-oxidative and anti-inflammatory capacities. Int. Immunopharmacol.15, 30–37. doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2012.10.026
49
WangY.XieJ.LiY.DongS.LiuH.ChenJ.et al. (2016). Probiotic Lactobacillus casei Zhang reduces pro-inflammatory cytokine production and hepatic inflammation in a rat model of acute liver failure. Eur. J. Nutr.55, 821–831. doi: 10.1007/s00394-015-0904-3
50
WuQ.LiuM.-C.YangJ.WangJ.-F.ZhuY.-H. (2016). Lactobacillus rhamnosus GR-1 ameliorates Escherichia coli-induced inflammation and cell damage via attenuation of ASC-independent NLRP3 inflammasome activation. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.82, 1173–1182. doi: 10.1128/AEM.03044-15
51
ZhangM.WuY.XieL.TengC.-H.WuF.-F.XuK.-B.et al. (2018). Isoliquiritigenin protects against blood brain barrier damage and inhibits the secretion of pro-inflammatory cytokines in mice after traumatic brain injury. Int. Immunopharmacol.65, 64–75. doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2018.09.046
52
ZhangY.MaC.ZhaoJ.XuH.HouQ.ZhangH. (2017). Lactobacillus casei Zhang and vitamin K2 prevent intestinal tumorigenesis in mice via adiponectin-elevated different signaling pathways. Oncotarget8, 24719–24727. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.15791
Summary
Keywords
Lactobacillus casei Zhang, bovine mammary epithelial cells, blood-milk barrier, mastitis, inflammatory response
Citation
Zheng Y, Liu G, Wang W, Wang Y, Cao Z, Yang H and Li S (2021) Lactobacillus casei Zhang Counteracts Blood-Milk Barrier Disruption and Moderates the Inflammatory Response in Escherichia coli-Induced Mastitis. Front. Microbiol. 12:675492. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.675492
Received
03 March 2021
Accepted
07 May 2021
Published
24 June 2021
Volume
12 - 2021
Edited by
Monica Cartelle Gestal, Louisiana State University Health Shreveport, United States
Reviewed by
Yunhe Fu, Jilin University, China; Anna Arís, Institute of Agrifood Research and Technology (IRTA), Spain; Carina Shianya Alvarez Villagomez, Universidad Juárez Autónoma de Tabasco, Mexico
Updates
Copyright
© 2021 Zheng, Liu, Wang, Wang, Cao, Yang and Li.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Shengli Li, lisheng0677@163.com
This article was submitted to Microbial Immunology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Microbiology
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.