Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Microbiol., 09 January 2023
Sec. Antimicrobials, Resistance and Chemotherapy

The clinical characteristics and microbiological investigation of pediatric burn patients with wound infections in a tertiary hospital in Ningbo, China: A ten-year retrospective study

Yefang KeYefang Ke1Lina YeLina Ye1Pan ZhuPan Zhu2Zhe Zhu
Zhe Zhu3*
  • 1Department of Clinical Laboratory, Ningbo Women and Children’s Hospital, Ningbo, Zhejiang, China
  • 2Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, Ningbo Women and Children’s Hospital, Ningbo, Zhejiang, China
  • 3Department of Blood Transfusion, HwaMei Hospital, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Ningbo, Zhejiang, China

Burn is one of the leading causes of death and disability in children worldwide, and wound infection is an excellent challenge in burn treatment. We performed a retrospective review of pediatric burn patients with wound infections to reveal their clinical data and investigate pathogens’ distribution and drug resistance patterns to provide references for treatment. As a result, 330 pediatric burn patients with wound infections were identified; 65.8% (217/330) were < 2 years old. Most of the injuries were scalded and involved <10% total body surface area in size (TBSA), mainly causing II-degree burn and II + III-degree burn. Three hundred and fifty nine strains of pathogens were isolated, the primary pathogens were Staphylococcus aureus (45.4%) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (18.7%). Both S. aureus and P. aeruginosa isolated from 2012 to 2016 were more likely to be multi-resistant than those isolated from 2017 to 2021, as they were significantly associated with resistance to ≥4 Clinical and Laboratory Standard Institute (CLSI) classes (p = 0.040 and 0.006, respectively). In conclusion, children aged <2 years old were the main pediatric burn patients with wound infections. The primary bacteria isolated from the wound were S. aureus and P. aeruginosa, with a decreasing tendency of multi-resistance.

Introduction

Burn injury is a leading cause of death and disability in the pediatric population worldwide, especially in low- and middle-income countries (Forjuoh, 2006; Haagsma et al., 2016). The loss of the skin barrier and immunosuppression caused by burn injury make patients susceptible to bacterial infection (Williams and Lee, 2021). Despite continual advances in treating burns, wound infection remains a considerable threat to burn patients.

Infectious diseases have become the primary cause of mortality in pediatric and adult burn patients (D'Abbondanza and Shahrokhi, 2021; Williams and Lee, 2021). Immediately after a burn occurs, the gut, skin, nasopharyngeal tract flora, and environmental microorganisms may reach the wound (Church et al., 2006). They may even enter the bloodstream, potentially leading to sepsis (Weaver Jr. et al., 2019). In addition, controlling and preventing infections among burn patients remains challenging. One of the most significant challenges is bacterial resistance to conventional antibiotics. The multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacteria exhibit co-resistance to many classes of antibiotics, accounting for the bulk of deaths due to sepsis (van Langeveld et al., 2017). Moreover, there was a limitation on antibiotic usage in children.

Information on the drug resistance of pathogens in the local pediatric burn unit is scarce. To better understand this disorder and provide references for treatment, we collected and analyzed the epidemiological characteristics of pediatric burn patients with wound infection and the isolated pathogenic microorganism. Additionally, new interventions for preventing nosocomial infection have been implemented since early 2017, including living far from each other, emphasizing hand hygiene, and limiting antibiotic usage. Therefore, we also compared the bacterial epidemiological data between 2012–2016 and 2017–2021 years.

Materials and methods

Study design and patient selection

This retrospective study was conducted at Ningbo Women and Children’s Hospital, the only pediatric tertiary hospital in Ningbo, Zhejiang, China. The institute ethics Committee approved this study (Certificate No.EC2022-M004), and the informed consent was waived.

Pediatric burn patients with pathogens isolated from their burn wounds from January 2012 to December 2021 were enrolled in this study. We excluded patients aged >14 years old, hospital length of stay (LOS) <3 days, or without complete clinical or microbiological data. Burn injury refers to those whose skin or other tissues are injured by heat, cold, ultraviolet radiation, electricity, friction, or chemicals, while most injuries in this study are due to heat from hot liquids or flame.

Demographic data, clinical characteristics (percentage of total body surface area burned [%TBSA], the severity of burn injury, and etiology), and microbiological information (isolated pathogens, antibiotic resistance) were collected from their medical records.

Microbiology methods

Microbial cultures and antimicrobial susceptibility tests were performed when they had signs of systemic or local infection, such as fever, erythema, local warmth, serous exudate, discoloration of granulation tissue, foul odor, etc. Samples were collected with sterilized swabs from the burn wounds. Only the first positive culture results were included.

The VITEK 2 COMPACT automatic analysis system (BioMérieux, France) was used to identify pathogens and perform antimicrobial susceptibility tests. Standard strains (ATCC700323, ATCC25922, ATCC700327, ATCC29213) were taken to control the test quality.

Antibiotic resistance was defined as resistant minimum inhibitory concentration. We determined the number of isolates that were fully susceptible and the number resistant to 1 class, 2 classes, 3 classes, and ≥ 4 classes. The susceptibility breakpoints were those recommended by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines (CLSI) for isolates obtained subsequently. The breakpoint criteria of the day in the analysis system were used to interpret the AST results, and the breakpoint criteria were updated promptly when the CLSI guidelines changed.

Statistical analysis

Categorical variables were presented as percentages. The comparison between 2012–2016 isolates and 2017–2021 isolates was analyzed by logistic regression or Fisher’s exact test. A p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. All statistical analyzes were performed using SPSS statistical 22.0 software (IBM, Armonk, NY, United States).

Results

Demographic and clinical characteristics

During the 10-year study period, 330 pediatric burn patients with wound infections were identified at our hospital. Of the total children included, 61.8% (204/330) were male, and 38.2% (126/330) were female; the male/female ratio was 1.62:1. Most of them (217/330, 65.8%) were < 2 years old. The leading cause of burns was hot water (83.3%). Most injuries were < 10% TBSA in size (245/330, 74.2%). II-degree burn (136/330, 41.2%) and II + III-degree burn (157/330, 47.6%) were the main categories depending on their severity (Table 1).

TABLE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. Demographic and clinical characteristics of 330 burn wound infection cases.

Pathogenic microorganism information

A total of 359 strains of pathogens were isolated from 330 children during the study period. Gram-positive bacteria, Gram-negative bacteria, and fungi accounted for 62.4% (224/359), 37.0% (133/359), and 0.6% (2/359), respectively.

Most burn wound infections were caused by a single organism (92.4%). The primary pathogens were Staphylococcus aureus (45.4%) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (18.7%). S. aureus was more isolated than P. aeruginosa during 2012–2021, and their annual changes of the detection rate were presented as Supplementary Figure S1. The others were Klebsiella pneumonia (3.1%), Enterobacter cloacae (2.5%), Acinetobacter baumannii (2.5%), etc., (Table 2).

TABLE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Table 2. Information on pathogenic microorganisms.

Antibiotic susceptibility

As S. aureus and P. aeruginosa were the two leading bacteria isolated, we analyzed their antibiotic resistance profiles detailly.

Most of the 163 S. aureus isolates were resistant to Penicillin (95.7%), and 46.6% (76/163) of them were methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA). On the other hand, they were all susceptible to Linezolid, Vancomycin, and Nitrofurantoin. The S. aureus isolated from 2012 to 2016 had higher resistance rates to TMP-SMX, Erythromycin, and Tetracycline than those isolated from 2017 to 2021 (p < 0.05 in all cases; Table 3).

TABLE 3
www.frontiersin.org

Table 3. Antibiotic resistance of Staphylococcus aureus among 2012–2016 isolates and 2017–2021 isolates.

According to susceptibility patterns, S. aureus that was isolated from 2012 to 2016 were more likely to be multi-resistant, as they were significantly associated with resistance to ≥4 CLSI classes (p = 0.040, OR:0.152, 95% CI: 0.025–0.920; (Table 3).

Of the P. aeruginosa, the resistance rate to Gentamicin was highest (68.7%, 46/67), followed by Amikacin (65.7%, 44/67) and Imipenem (62.7%, 42/67). The P. aeruginosa isolated from 2012 to 2016 had higher resistance rates to Amikacin, Cefepime, Gentamicin, Ceftazidime, Imipenem, and Piperacillin/tazobactam than those isolated from 2017 to 2021 (p < 0.05 in all cases). On the other hand, the P. aeruginosa isolated from 2012 to 2016 had lower resistance rates to Ciprofloxacin and Levofloxacin than those isolated from 2017 to 2021; however, they did not reach significant differences (p = 0.05; Table 4).

TABLE 4
www.frontiersin.org

Table 4. Antibiotic resistance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa among 2012–2016 isolates and 2017–2021 isolates.

According to susceptibility patterns, P. aeruginosa that was isolated from 2012–2016 were more likely to be multi-resistant, as they were significantly associated with resistance to ≥4 CLSI classes (p = 0.006, OR: 0.125, 95% CI: 0.028–0.553; (Table 4).

Besides, the annual changes of drug resistance rate and resistance to ≥4 CLSI classes of S. aureus and P. aeruginosa were presented in Supplementary Table S1; Supplementary Figure S2. Generally, there were down trends of both S. aureus and P. aeruginosa in annual resistance to ≥4 CLSI classes from 2012 to 2021 (p = 0.017 and 0.146, respectively).

Discussion

Previous studies have shown that most pediatric burn patients were < 2 years old, and boys occupied the majority (Li et al., 2021; Ruan et al., 2021; Sarginson et al., 2021). So did those pediatric burn patients with wound infections in this study. Of the 330 pediatric burn patients with wound infections, more than half (65.8%) were < 2 years old, and the boy/girl ratio was 1.62:1. Children aged <2 years old, especially boys, were very active without self-protective ability. In addition, they may be ignored by family members sometimes, leading them to be the main groups injured by burning. Besides, scald was considered as the first cause of pediatric burns in many former reports (Li et al., 2021; Loos et al., 2021; Ruan et al., 2021; Sarginson et al., 2021). Our study confirmed that hot water and food/beverage scald accounted for 83.3 and 10.3%, respectively. These remind us to strengthen child care, to protect them from hot water and food/beverage, especially for young boys. Luckily, similar to former reports, most burn children were moderate according to TBSA and severity (Armstrong et al., 2021; Ruan et al., 2021; Sarginson et al., 2021).

The infection was a great challenge for burn treatment, which led to increased pain and delayed healing, scarring, sepsis risk, hospital stays, and healthcare costs (Jeschke et al., 2020; Partain et al., 2020; Krasnoff et al., 2021). The burn wound was the central part to be infected. Identifying the primary bacterium and their drug-resistant profiles was critical for controlling the infection.

Studies have shown that S. aureus and P. aeruginosa were the leading bacteria isolated from burn wounds (Rashid et al., 2019; Mater et al., 2020; Basit et al., 2021; Cato et al., 2021; Hashemzadeh et al., 2022). While most of these studies investigated adults with/without children, little information was available on pediatric burn patients. Despite the study participants being different from the formers (Rashid et al., 2019; Mater et al., 2020; Basit et al., 2021; Cato et al., 2021; Hashemzadeh et al., 2022), the primary pathogenic bacteria detected from the burn wound of pediatric patients were also S. aureus and P. aeruginosa in the present study. In other words, Staphylococcus and P. aeruginosa were the primary bacteria infected burn wounds that are irrelevant to the host’s age. Staphylococcus is the resident flora in the skin (Kazmierczak and Szewczyk, 2004). P. aeruginosa often exists in the hospital environment (Thi et al., 2020), which may lead them to be the primary bacterium isolated from burn wounds.

The pattern of bacterial resistance is essential for epidemiology and clinical therapy. In recent years, MDR has become a global health concern (van Langeveld et al., 2017). Previous studies have reported that MRSA was the most frequent microbial agent of the outbreak and significantly increased morbidity and mortality. The rate of MRSA in the present study was 46.6%, which was higher than that reported in India (Joy et al., 2020), Saudi Arabia (Mater et al., 2020), and Morocco (Frikh et al., 2018). Fortunately, all S. aureus in this study were sensitive to Linezolid and Vancomycin, and the rate of resistant ≥4 CLSI classes isolates was significantly decreased. Meanwhile, the antimicrobial resistance of P. aeruginosa was reduced for decades. It was in accordance with a study performed in southwest China, which found that the rate of MDR P. aeruginosa sharply decreased in the burn-intensive units (Gong et al., 2021). In the present study, the decreasing antibiotic resistance rates of main pathogenic bacteria may mainly attribute to new interventions for preventing nosocomial infection, including living far from each other, emphasizing hand hygiene, and limiting antibiotic usage.

However, this study had some limitations. First, this was a single-center retrospective study. Second, only the first positive culture results were included in this study; therefore, it could not reflect the dynamic changes in pathogen resistance over time and after antibiotic treatment. Third, the tendency of antimicrobial resistance of S. aureus and P. aeruginosa were not intensively studied; further studies should focus on their molecular mechanisms. Therefore, a prospective study with dynamic and genetic analysis was warranted.

In conclusion, this study provided information on the clinical and microbiological data of pediatric burn patients with wound infection. Most pediatric burn patients with burn wound infection were aged <2 years old. The leading cause of burns was scalded and involved <10% TBSA, mainly causing II-degree burn and II + III-degree burn. S. aureus and P. aeruginosa were the primary bacteria isolated from burn wounds and showed a decreasing prevalence of antimicrobial resistance. Infection-control strategies and treatment should be performed according to the characteristics of pediatric burn patients and bacteria isolated.

Data availability statement

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.

Ethics statement

The studies involving human participants were reviewed and approved by Ningbo Women and Children’s Hospital Ethics Committee. Written informed consent from the participants’ legal guardian/next of kin was not required to participate in this study in accordance with the national legislation and the institutional requirements.

Author contributions

YK analyzed the data and wrote the manuscript. LY and PZ collected the data. ZZ designed the study and revised the manuscript. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Funding

This study was supported by the Ningbo Public Service Technology Foundation, China (no. 2021S155) and the Medical Scientific Research Foundation of Zhejiang Province, China (no. 2022KY1158).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2022.1034099/full#supplementary-material

References

Armstrong, M., Wheeler, K. K., Shi, J., Thakkar, R. K., Fabia, R. B., Groner, J. I., et al. (2021). Epidemiology and trend of us pediatric burn hospitalizations, 2003-2016. Burns 47, 551–559. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2020.05.021

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Basit, M., Siddique, A. B., Aslam, B., Zahoor, M. A., Hussain, R., and Ulhaq, M. (2021). Distribution and antimicrobial susceptibility profile of bacterial and fungal pathogens isolated from burn wounds in hospitalized patients. J. Pak. Med. Assoc. 71, 916–920. doi: 10.47391/JPMA.1245

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Cato, L. D., Al-Tarrah, K., and Moiemen, N. (2021). Changes in burn wound microbiology profile over 14 years of an adult tertiary burn center. J. Burn Care Res. :irab184. doi: 10.1093/jbcr/irab184

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Church, D., Elsayed, S., Reid, O., Winston, B., and Lindsay, R. (2006). Burn wound infections. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 19, 403–434. doi: 10.1128/CMR.19.2.403-434.2006

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

D'Abbondanza, J. A., and Shahrokhi, S. (2021). Burn infection and burn sepsis. Surg. Infect. 22, 58–64. doi: 10.1089/sur.2020.102

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Forjuoh, S. N. (2006). Burns in low- and middle-income countries: a review of available literature on descriptive epidemiology, risk factors, treatment, and prevention. Burns 32, 529–537. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2006.04.002

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Frikh, M., Abdelhay, L., Jalal, K., Imad, Y., Yassine, B., Bouchra, B., et al. (2018). Profile and antibiotic susceptibility of bacteria isolates in burn patients hospitalized in a Moroccan hospital: a cross-sectional study. Wounds 30, 102–107.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

Gong, Y., Peng, Y., Luo, X., Zhang, C., Shi, Y., Zhang, Y., et al. (2021). Different infection profiles and antimicrobial resistance patterns between burn Icu and common wards. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 11:681731. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2021.681731

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Haagsma, J. A., Graetz, N., Bolliger, I., Naghavi, M., Higashi, H., Mullany, E. C., et al. (2016). The global burden of injury: incidence, mortality, disability-adjusted life years and time trends from the global burden of disease study 2013. Inj. Prev. 22, 3–18. doi: 10.1136/injuryprev-2015-041616

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hashemzadeh, M., Heydari, R., Dezfuli, A. Z., Saki, M., Meghdadi, H., and Bakhtiyariniya, P. (2022). Occurrence of multiple-drug resistance bacteria and their antimicrobial resistance patterns in burn infections from southwest of Iran. J. Burn Care Res. 43, 423–431. doi: 10.1093/jbcr/irab097

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Jeschke, M. G., van Baar, M. E., Choudhry, M. A., Chung, K. K., Gibran, N. S., and Logsetty, S. (2020). Burn Injury. Nat. Rev. Dis. Primers. 6:11. doi: 10.1038/s41572-020-0145-5

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Joy, S., D'Souza, R. C., Shreevidya, K., Surlu, V. R., Suresh, S., Jakribettu, R. P., et al. (2020). Bacteriological profile of pathogens in burns unit of a tertiary care center: a retrospective observational study. Wounds 32, 345–349.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

Kazmierczak, A. K., and Szewczyk, E. M. (2004). Bacteria forming a resident Flora of the skin as a potential source of opportunistic infections. Pol. J. Microbiol. 53, 249–255.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

Krasnoff, C. C., Grigorian, A., Chin, T., Joe, V., Kong, A., Barrios, C., et al. (2021). Pediatric burn-trauma patients have increased length of stay compared to trauma-only patients: a propensity matched analysis. Burns 47, 78–83. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2020.04.029

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Li, X., Wang, X., Wang, T., Yu, H., Zhou, Y., Wang, H., et al. (2021). Multimethod assessing the prognosis affecting factors of hospitalized children with burns in Zunyi, Southwest China. Wien. Klin. Wochenschr. 133, 194–201. doi: 10.1007/s00508-020-01676-z

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Loos, M. H. J., Meij-de Vries, A., Nagtegaal, M., and Bakx, R., group K (2021). Child abuse and neglect in Paediatric burns: the majority is caused by neglect and thus preventable. Burns 48, 688–697. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2021.05.011

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Mater, M. E., Yamani, A. E., Aljuffri, A. A., and Binladen, S. A. (2020). Epidemiology of burn-related infections in the largest burn unit in Saudi Arabia. Saudi Med. J. 41, 726–732. doi: 10.15537/smj.2020.7.25141

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Partain, K. P., Fabia, R., and Thakkar, R. K. (2020). Pediatric burn care: new techniques and outcomes. Curr. Opin. Pediatr. 32, 405–410. doi: 10.1097/MOP.0000000000000902

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Rashid, A., Saqib, M., Deeba, F., and Khan, J. A. (2019). Microbial profile of burn wound infections and their antibiotic sensitivity patterns at burn unit of allied hospital Faisalabad. Pak. J. Pharm. Sci. 32, 247–254.

Google Scholar

Ruan, J., Xi, M., and Xie, W. (2021). Analysis of 12,661 pediatric burns in Wuhan Institute of Burns: a retrospective study of fifteen years. Burns 47, 1915–1921. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2021.02.021

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sarginson, J. H., Hollen, L., Emond, A., Mackie, I., and Young, A. E. (2021). Multicentre observational study describing the systemic response to small-area burns in children. Burns 47, 560–568. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2020.07.020

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Thi, M. T. T., Wibowo, D., and Rehm, B. H. A. (2020). Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 21:8671. doi: 10.3390/ijms21228671

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

van Langeveld, I., Gagnon, R. C., Conrad, P. F., Gamelli, R. L., Martin, B., Choudhry, M. A., et al. (2017). Multiple-drug resistance in burn patients: a retrospective study on the impact of antibiotic resistance on survival and length of stay. J. Burn Care Res. 38, 99–105. doi: 10.1097/BCR.0000000000000479

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Weaver, A. J. Jr., Brandenburg, K. S., Smith, B. W., and Leung, K. P. (2019). Comparative analysis of the host response in a rat model of deep-partial and full-thickness burn wounds with Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 9:466. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2019.00466

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Williams, F. N., and Lee, J. O. (2021). Pediatric burn infection. Surg. Infect. 22, 54–57. doi: 10.1089/sur.2020.218

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: burn, pediatric, pathogenic, microbiological, drug resistance

Citation: Ke Y, Ye L, Zhu P and Zhu Z (2023) The clinical characteristics and microbiological investigation of pediatric burn patients with wound infections in a tertiary hospital in Ningbo, China: A ten-year retrospective study. Front. Microbiol. 13:1034099. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.1034099

Received: 01 September 2022; Accepted: 13 December 2022;
Published: 09 January 2023.

Edited by:

Sasha Shafikhani, Rush University, United States

Reviewed by:

Dou Yi, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, China
Xiaojiong Jia, Harvard Medical School, United States

Copyright © 2023 Ke, Ye, Zhu and Zhu. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Zhe Zhu, ✉ zhuzhemcgrady@163.com

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.