Abstract
Fungal–algal relationships—both across evolutionary and ecological scales—are finely modulated by the presence of the symbionts in the environments and by the degree of selectivity and specificity that either symbiont develop reciprocally. In lichens, the green algal genus Trebouxia Puymaly is one of the most frequently recovered chlorobionts. Trebouxia species-level lineages have been recognized on the basis of their morphological and phylogenetic diversity, while their ecological preferences and distribution are still only partially unknown. We selected two cosmopolitan species complexes of lichen-forming fungi as reference models, i.e., Rhizoplaca melanophthalma and Tephromela atra, to investigate the diversity of their associated Trebouxia spp. in montane habitats across their distributional range worldwide. The greatest diversity of Trebouxia species-level lineages was recovered in the altitudinal range 1,000–2,500 m a.s.l. A total of 10 distinct Trebouxia species-level lineages were found to associate with either mycobiont, for which new photobionts are reported. One previously unrecognized Trebouxia species-level lineage was identified and is here provisionally named Trebouxia “A52.” Analyses of cell morphology and ultrastructure were performed on axenically isolated strains to fully characterize the new Trebouxia “A52” and three other previously recognized lineages, i.e., Trebouxia “A02,” T. vagua “A04,” and T. vagua “A10,” which were successfully isolated in culture during this study. The species-level diversity of Trebouxia associating with the two lichen-forming fungi in extreme habitats helps elucidate the evolutionary pathways that this lichen photobiont genus traversed to occupy varied climatic and vegetative regimes.
Introduction
Lichens are self-sustaining ecosystems formed by the interaction of an exhabitant fungus and an extracellular arrangement of one or more microscopic photosynthetic partners and an indeterminate number of other microorganisms (). The symbiotic phenotype of a lichen, however, is thought to be mainly dictated by the phenotype of the predominant exhabitant lichen-forming fungus, i.e., the mycobiont (; ). The photosynthetic partners, instead, consist of either unicellular green microalgae or blue-green cyanobacteria, i.e., chlorobionts or cyanobionts, respectively (the biologically relevant photobiont, ). The obligate symbiotic relationship established between the mycobiont and the photobionts represents one of the most successful nutritional strategies among fungi, occurring in almost every terrestrial environment on Earth ().
The success of these fungal–algal relationships both across evolutionary and ecological scales is finely modulated by the two main symbionts and their degree of selectivity and specificity that they develop reciprocally (; Yahr et al., 2004, 2006). Thus, specific or generalist associations among the lichen symbionts (; ; ; ; ) have significant impacts on the structure of lichen communities and species distribution (; Werth and Sork, 2014; Steinova et al., 2019). Some mycobionts tend to accept only single algal lineages, while others, more generalist, can associate with many different algal lineages (Yahr et al., 2004). Similarly, photobionts and their preference toward the fungal partners have also been reported ().
The genus Trebouxia Puymaly is one of the most frequently occurring chlorobiont in lichens. Its species associate with mycobionts which are phylogenetically distantly related among Ascomycota and come from very diverse ecological conditions (). While Trebouxia has received considerable attention, only recently has species diversity been more fully recognized and characterized according to their genetic, and to a less extent morphological, diversity and ecological preferences (; ; ). While 29 Trebouxia species have been formally described to date based on the combination of morphological traits and genetic diversity (,; , ; ), the majority of species-level lineages in this important algal genus lack formal description. Data on their biogeographic and ecological patterns, as well as on physiological traits, are largely missing. assembled the most comprehensive taxon sampling for Trebouxia and provided a genus-wide, multi-locus phylogenetic hypothesis to use as reference. In their study, the authors confirmed the recognition of four main Trebouxia clades—i.e., clade “A” arboricola/gigantea type, clade “C” corticola type, clade “I” impressa/gelatinosa type, and clade “S” simplex/jamesii type—within which they further identified some major new species-level lineages (). More recently, Xu et al. (2020) provisionally segregated some Trebouxia algae belonging to clade “S” into a new clade “D,” as these photobionts formed a well-supported monophyletic lineage and were found to specifically associate with the lichen-forming fungus Cetrariella delisei. Clade “D” is supported in phylogenetic analyses based on four loci but still lacks a proper morphological characterization (Xu et al., 2020), and some studies still considered it as part of clade “S” (; ).
Better characterization of diagnostic traits among distinct Trebouxia species-level lineages will be key to creating a robust, integrative taxonomy for this genus. Typical taxonomically diagnostic traits are based on the structure and the extension of the chloroplast lobes, and the distinct arrangement of thylakoid and osmiophilic pyrenoglobules in the pyrenoid (,; ,; ; ). To perform reliable analyses of these traits, axenic cultures of Trebouxia phycobionts are essential. In fact, only in algae grown in standardized in vitro conditions is it possible to reliably analyze morphological and physiological traits of putative species-level lineages. Culturing algal cells is also important to correlate the in vitro traits with those exhibited in the symbiotic state inside the lichen thalli. recently compiled a new morphological and ultrastructural characterization of 20 Trebouxia species-level lineages, reappraising and implementing the classification of Trebouxia in accordance with the phylogenetic delimitation provided by .
The presence of many new phylogenetic clades for Trebouxia highlights that species diversity in this genus has been underestimated, with a high proportion of previously unrecognized diversity recently found in undersampled geographic areas (; ). Furthermore, crustose lichens seem to be cradles for new Trebouxia species-level lineages, as these lichens usually are more rarely collected and studied with molecular techniques. In the present study, we investigated in more detail the Trebouxia species diversity in the two epilithic cosmopolitan lichens Rhizoplaca melanophthalma (DC.) agg. Leuckert & Poelt and Tephromela atra (Huds.) Hafellner (, ,; ,) collected from high altitudes in rather extreme environments. Both R. melanophthalma and T. atra represent species complexes, with distinct members within each complex potentially occurring sympatrically (,, ; ,). However, throughout the manuscript, the two species groups are referred to by their traditional names. Indeed, previous studies aimed at characterizing the morphological and genetic diversity of their mycobionts and photobionts, respectively, have also highlighted the presence of new, rather specific Trebouxia lineages associating with both mycobiont species complexes (, ,; ,). While R. melanophthalma was found to associate with a relatively narrow range of photobionts (,), 12 clades of Trebouxia were recovered to associate with T. atra, five of which (clades I–V in ) were identified as new, well-supported, distinct lineages.
Here, we aim to assess the potential of unidentified Trebouxia species which may represent locally adapted photobionts in rather extreme montane environments worldwide. Taking as reference models the two lichens R. melanophthalma and T. atra, we will be able to detect whether the recovered chlorobionts represent new Trebouxia lineages specific to the peculiar environments where the thalli were collected or if they are part of the already identified photobiont pool with which the two mycobionts associate. We implement an integrative taxonomic approach, combining morphological and ultrastructural data from axenic cultures and thallus sections with genetic data obtained both from culture isolates and the original corresponding lichen thalli. We hypothesize that R. melanophthalma and T. atra collected at high elevation and in very dry conditions share Trebouxia photobionts unique to this type of habitats, while we expect to recover already-identified species-level lineages from samples at lower altitude and less selective environmental conditions. The works of and are here used as references for naming the species-level lineages and characterizing their phenotypic traits, respectively.
Materials and Methods
Sampling
Two species of epilithic cosmopolitan lichen-forming fungi, i.e., Rhizoplaca melanophthalma agg. and Tephromela atra, were collected in 43 sites worldwide, the majority of them on different mountain chains, including the Alps in Europe, the Andean Cordillera in South America, and the Rocky Mountains in North America. Most of the sampling sites are located at middle to high altitudes, e.g., above 1,400 m a.s.l., and are characterized by rather extreme oligotrophic environmental conditions. Only two sampling sites from Chile and Tasmania are located below 1,000 m a.s.l., but still in remote mountainous areas (Table 1). At the sampling sites, up to 15 thalli were collected for each population of either species; both species were sometime co-present. A total of 32 populations (67 total thalli) of R. melanophthalma agg. and 21 populations (40 total thalli) of T. atra were used in this study for both thallus DNA extractions and culture isolations of the photobionts.
TABLE 1
| Lichen species | Thallus ID | Altitude (m a.s.l.) | Rock type | Geographic origin |
| Rhizoplaca cf. melanophthalma | L2384 | 1450 | Basaltic boulders | (1) Argentina, prov. Mendoza, dep. Malargue, Laguna de Llancanelo, RP186, 20 km after the crossroad with RN40; S/SW exposed, scattered in dry pampa vegetation, ca. 35°42′50′′S/69°27′18′′W (L. Muggia) |
| Rhizoplaca cf. melanophthalma | L2385(*1) | |||
| Rhizoplaca cf. melanophthalma | L2388(*2) | |||
| Rhizoplaca cf. melanophthalma | L2389(*3) | |||
| Rhizoplaca cf. melanophthalma | L2398(*4) | 1450 | Basaltic/vulcanic rocks | (2) Argentina, prov. Mendoza, dep. Malargue, payunia, 60 km W from Carapacho village and Laguna de Llancanelo, gravel road leading to Puesto Forquera/Payen Matrù, pampa vegetation, on S side of the rocks, ca. 36°12′40′′S/69°11′35′′W (L. Muggia) |
| Rhizoplaca cf. melanophthalma | L2400(*5) | |||
| Rhizoplaca cf. melanophthalma | L2421(*6) | 2000 | Basaltic boulders | (3) Argentina, prov. Mendoza, dep. Malargue, El Sosneado valley, Laguna el Sosneado, S/SW exposed, dry pampa vegetation, ca. 34°50′43′′S/69°54′55′′W (L. Muggia) |
| Rhizoplaca cf. melanophthalma | L2428 | |||
| Rhizoplaca cf. melanophthalma | L2452(*7) | 3550 | Acid big boulders | (4) Argentina, prov. Mendoza, Tunuyan, Cordillera del los Andes (E side), road 94 toward portillo Argentino, camp “Yareta,” 3550 m a.s.l., on acid big boulder, E-S exposed (L. Muggia) |
| Rhizoplaca cf. melanophthalma | L2455(*8) | |||
| Rhizoplaca cf. melanophthalma | L2460(*42) | 3330 | Acid rocks | (5) Argentina, prov. Mendoza, Cordillera de los Andes (E side), Las Cuevas, lowest border of Mt. Tolosa glacier, S-W exposed (L. Muggia) |
| Rhizoplaca cf. melanophthalma | L2505 | 4813 | Acid rocks | (6) Argentina, prov. Mendoza, Potrerillo, Cordillera de los Andes (E side), Cordon del Plata Range, Quebrada del Salto, ridge between Cerro El Salto and Cerro Blanco, E-exposed, ca. 32.91376 S/69.40169 W (L. Muggia) |
| Rhizoplaca cf. melanophthalma | L2513 | 5100 | (7) Argentina, prov. Catamarca, dep. Fiambalà, Ojo del el Salado, road toward the Ojo del el Salado (A. E. Armesto) | |
| Tephromela atra | L2545(*9) | 600 | (8) Chile, Region de Aysén del General Carlos Ibanez del Campo, prov. Capitan Prat, dep. Cochrane, Tamango National Reserve (J. Orlando and D. Leiva) | |
| Tephromela atra | L2551(*10) | |||
| Tephromela atra | L2560(*11) | |||
| Tephromela atra | L2561(*12) | |||
| Rhizoplaca cf. melanophthalma | L2567(*13) | 2080 | Siliceous-granitic boulders | (9) Europa, Spain, prov. Madrid, Miraflores del la Sierra, Puerto de la Morquera, summit of Pico Najarra, ca. 40°48′55′′N/3°49′34′′W (L. Muggia and S. Perez-Ortega) |
| Tephromela atra | L2570(*14) | |||
| Tephromela atra | L2571 | |||
| Tephromela atra | L2583(*15) | 1900 | Siliceous-granitic boulders | (10) Europe, Spain, prov. Madrid, Miraflores del la Sierra, Puerto de la Morquera, toward Pico Najarra, about 150 m above Puerto de la Morquera, ca. 40°49′22′′N/3°49′49′′W (L. Muggia and S. Perez-Ortega) |
| Rhizoplaca cf. melanophthalma | L2585(*16) | |||
| Rhizoplaca cf. melanophthalma | L2589(*17) | |||
| Rhizoplaca cf. melanophthalma | L2593(*18) | |||
| Tephromela atra | L2597(*19) | 545 | Dolorite boulders | (11) Australia, Tasmania, three Thumbs, summit area, 42°36′S/147°52′E, Grid; 570752828/Grid. Sq.: 5728; in dry sclerophyll forest (G. Kantvilas) |
| Tephromela atra | L2598(*20) | |||
| Tephromela atra | L2599(*21) | |||
| Rhizoplaca cf melanophthalma | L2635(*22) | Quartzite outcrop | (12) United States, Utah, Utah Co., Rock Canyon, ca. 2 km from trailhead, on exposed quartzite outcrop on north-facing side of canyon; 40.2649, −111.6179 - (Leavitt 19-303) | |
| Rhizoplaca cf melanophthalma | L2669(*23) | 1665 | Sandstone boulders | (13) United States, Utah, Emery County, vic. of Horse Canyon Rest Area along US Highway 6, on sandstone in Pinyon/Juiper woodland: 39.4123, −110.4320 |
| Rhizoplaca cf melanophthalma | L2671(*24) | |||
| Rhizoplaca cf melanophthalma | L2689(*25) | 2020 | Wasatch Formation | (14) United States, Utah, Rich Co., southeast of Bear Lake along Highway 30 and west of Sage Creek Junction, on rock in sage-steppe habitat (Leavitt 19–157) |
| Rhizoplaca cf melanophthalma | L2688(*43) | |||
| Rhizoplaca cf melanophthalma | L2705(*26) | 2490 | Sandstone boulder | (15) United States, Utah, Duchesne Co.; Ashley National Forest; South Unit, on Nutter’s Ridge, on sandstone outcrup north-east of exclusure site: 39.9481–110.4292 |
| Rhizoplaca cf melanophthalma | L2722(*27) | 1845 | Basalt/volcanic rocks | (16) United States, Idaho, Owyhee Co. Along Mud Flat Rd, 27.7 miles from Hishway 78. 42.704228–166.3832 (Leavitt 19.233) |
| Rhizoplaca cf melanophthalma | L2723(28*) | |||
| Rhizoplaca cf melanophthalma | L2724(*29) | |||
| Rhizoplaca cf melanophthalma | L2725(*30) | |||
| Rhizoplaca cf melanophthalma | L2732(*31) | 2210 | Silicic ash flow tuff | (17) United States, Nevada, Nye Co., Humboldt-Toiyabe National Forest, Table Mountain Wilderness Area, near boundary of Table Mountain Wilderness Area, along USFS Road No. 4409b, at Mosquito Creek Trailhead.; 38.80717–116.682 |
| Rhizoplaca cf melanophthalma | L2733(*32) | |||
| Rhizoplaca cf melanophthalma | L2734(*33) | |||
| Rhizoplaca cf melanophthalma | L2735(*34) | |||
| Rhizoplaca cf. melanophthalma | L2787(*35) | 2700 | Acidic rocks | (18) Argentina, prov. Mendoza, road RP52, near to Paramillo, ca. 30 m above the road, ca. 32°30′13′′S/69°03′18′′W (L. Muggia) |
| Rhizoplaca cf. melanophthalma | L2796(*36) | |||
| Rhizoplaca cf. melanophthalma | L2803(*37) | 4300 | Acidic rocks | (19) Argentina, prov. Mendoza, dep. Tunuyan, valley toward Portillo Argentino (RN86), summit of Cerro Punta Negra (L. Muggia) |
| Rhizoplaca cf. melanophthalma | L2802(*38) | |||
| Rhizoplaca cf. melanophthalma | L2824(*39) | 3650 | Basic granitic rocks | (20) Argentina, prov. Mendoza, dep. Tunuyan, valley toward Portillo Argentino (RN86), ca. 100 height m above the bridge/bifurcation with the road toward Manantiales Valley (L. Muggia) |
| Rhizoplaca cf. melanophthalma | L2825 | |||
| Rhizoplaca cf. melanophthalma | L2826(*40) | |||
| Rhizoplaca cf. melanophthalma | L2827(*41) | |||
| Tephromela atra | L3272 | 2200 | Siliceous rocks | (21) Italy, Trentino Alto Adige, prov. Trento, Pergine Valsugana, Valley of Mocheni, Mt. Gronlait, 100 height meter below summit, N side of the path, E/N-exposed, ca. 46°05′39 ′′N/11°21′42′′E (L. Muggia and A. Cometto) |
| Tephromela atra | L3273 | |||
| Tephromela atra | L3280 | 2150 | Siliceous rocks/cliffs | (22) Italy, Trentino Alto Adige, prov. Trento, Pergine Valsugana, Val dei Mocheni, Passo La Portella, S-exposed, ca. 46°05′38′′N/11°21′57′′E (L. Muggia and A. Cometto) |
| Rhizoplaca cf melanophthalma | L3287(*44) | 2300 | Siliceous rocks | (23) Italy, Trentino Alto Adige, prov. Bolzano, MaziaValley (Matschertal), path to Tartscher Kreuz, boulders in open meadow, W-and S-exposed, ca. 46°41′57′′N/10°35′45′′E (L. Muggia and A. Cometto) |
| Rhizoplaca cf melanophthalma | L3293 | |||
| Tephromela atra | L3314(*45) | |||
| Tephromela atra | L3317 | |||
| Rhizoplaca cf melanophthalma | L3335(*46) | 2100 | Siliceous rocks | (24) Italy, Trentino Alto Adige, prov. Bolzano, Mazia Valley (Matschertal), path to Tartscher Kreuz, on boulders in open meadow, S-exposed, ca. 46°41′33′′N/10°35′49′′E (L. Muggia and A. Cometto) |
| Rhizoplaca cf melanophthalma | L3336(*47) | |||
| Rhizoplaca cf melanophthalma | L3340 | |||
| Tephromela atra | L3352 | |||
| Tephromela atra | L3358 | |||
| Rhizoplaca cf melanophthalma | L3365(48*) | 2370 | Siliceous-granic boulders | (25) Italy, Lombardia, prov. Sondrio, Valmalenco, Chiesa di Valmalenco, at Laghetti di Sassersa, S side of first (lower) lake, S-exposed, ca. 46°16′30′′N/9°48′47′′E (L. Muggia and A. Cometto) |
| Tephromela atra | L3396 | 1650 | Siliceous/shists tiles | (26) Italy, Piemonte, prov. Verbania-Cusio-Ossola, Val Vigezzo, Alpe Villasco, on roof tile, N-exposed (L. Muggia and A. Cometto) |
| Tephromela atra | L3398 | |||
| Tephromela atra | L3404(*49) | 2300 | Granitic boulders | (27) Italy, Aosta Valley, saddle below Mt. Chaligne S/E side, alpine vegetation, ca. 45°46′08′′N/7°14′52′′E (L. Muggia A. Cometto) |
| Tephromela atra | L3405 | |||
| Rhizoplaca cf melanophthalma | L3419(*50) | |||
| Rhizoplaca cf melanophthalma | L3422(*51) | |||
| Rhizoplaca cf melanophthalma | L3438 | 2510 | Granitic-schist boulders | (28) Italy, Aosta Valley, prov. Aosta, Punta Chaligne, on the saddle N side of the summit, ca. 45°46′16′′N/7°14′06′′E (L. Muggia and A. Cometto) |
| Rhizoplaca cf melanophthalma | L3440 | |||
| Tephromela atra | L3470 | |||
| Tephromela atra | L3471 | |||
| Tephromela atra | L3472(*53) | 1950 | Silecous bricks/rocks | (29) Italy, Aosta Valley, prov. Aosta, Gressoney Valley, path to Colle Pinter, Alta Via n. 1, about 100 height meter above Alm Alpenzu, N/W/S-exposed, ca. 45°48′13′′N/7°48′50′′E (L. Muggia and A. Cometto) |
| Tephromela atra | L3474 | |||
| Rhizoplaca cf melanophthalma | L3481 | 2800 | Granitic-siliceous cliff | (30) Italy, Aosta Valley, prov. Aosta, Gressoney Valley, Colle Pinter, Alta Via n. 1 (AV1, path n. 6), big cliffs right above the pass, S/W-exposed, 45°49′12′′N/7°47′14′′E (L. Muggia and A. Cometto) |
| Rhizoplaca cf melanophthalma | L3484 | |||
| Rhizoplaca cf melanophthalma | L3496 | 2250 | Granitic boulders | (31) Italy, Aosta Valley, prov. Aosta, Gressoney Valley, path to Colle Pinter, Alta Via n. 1 (AV1, path n. 6), before at Alpe Loasche, S-exposed, ca. 45°48′26′′N/7°48′11′′E (L. Muggia and A. Cometto) |
| Rhizoplaca cf melanophthalma | L3497 | |||
| Tephromela atra | L3523(*54) | 1550 | Siliceous rocks/cliffs | (32) Italy, Aosta Valley, prov. Aosta, Gressoney Valley, Alta Via n. 1 (AV1, path n. 6), path from Gressoney to Alpe Alpenzu, S/E-exposed, ca. 45°48′263′′N/7°48′11′′E (L. Muggia and A. Cometto) |
| Tephromela atra | L3536 | 1750 | Granitic boulders | (33) Italy, Piemonte, prov. Turin, Valley D’ Ala (Lanzo Valley), Ala di Stura, loc. Balme, path n. 228 to Lago Ru, open Larix vegetation on broad bankings, S-exposed (L. Muggia and A. Cometto) |
| Rhizoplaca cf melanophthalma | L3538(*55) | |||
| Rhizoplaca cf melanophthalma | L3540 | |||
| Tephromela atra | L3555 | 1500 | Granitic rocks | (34) Italy, Piemonte, prov. Turin, Valley D’ Ala (Lanzo Valley), Ala di Stura, loc. Balme, path n. 228 to Lago Ru, at bifurcation with the path to climbing crag “Le Ginevre,” 100 height m above Balme, shadowed, 45°18′11′′N/7°12′56′′E (L. Muggia and A. Cometto) |
| Tephromela atra | L3559 | |||
| Rhizoplaca cf melanophthalma | L3564 | |||
| Rhizoplaca cf melanophthalma | L3572 | |||
| Rhizoplaca cf melanophthalma | L3576(*56) | 1410 | Granitic boulders | (35) Italy, Piemonte, prov. Turin, Valley D’ Ala (Lanzo Valley), Ala di Stura, loc. Balme, before entering the village, in front of basketball field, 45°18′13′′N/7°13′23′′E (L. Muggia and A. Cometto) |
| Rhizoplaca cf melanophthalma | L3577(*57) | |||
| Rhizoplaca cf melanophthalma | L3594(*58) | 2500 | Siliceous rocks/boulders | (36) Italy, Piemonte, prov. Cuneo (Alpi Cozie) Varaita Valley, alpine meadows, main road going up to Colle dell’ Agnello, S-exposed, 44°40′42′′N/6°59′18′′E (L. Muggia and A. Cometto) |
| Rhizoplaca cf melanophthalma | L3616 | 2250 | Siliceous rocks/boulders | (37) Italy, Piemonte, prov. Cuneo (Alpi Cozie), Val Varaita-Val Maira, Colle di Sampeyre, W of the pass, 44°33′06′′N/7°07′05′′E (L. Muggia and A. Cometto) |
| Rhizoplaca cf melanophthalma | L3617 | |||
| Tephromela atra | L3648 | |||
| Rhizoplaca cf melanophthalma | L3653(*59) | 2340 | Marmor-siliceous rocks | (38) Italy, Piemonte, prov. Cuneo (Alpi Cozie), Val Maira, Preit, Colle Solegno Blue, rock right above N/E of the pass, S-exposed, 44°26′21′′N/7°01′53′′E (L. Muggia and A. Cometto) |
| Rhizoplaca cf melanophthalma | L3655(*60) | |||
| Tephromela atra | L3681(*61) | 1650 | Schist-siliceous rocks | (39) Italy, Piemonte, prov. Cuneo (Alpi Cozie), Val Maira, Preit, path to Colle Solegno Blue, shadowed, S-exposed (L. Muggia and A. Cometto) |
| Tephromela atra | L3696(*62) | 2100 | Schist-arenaria rocks | (40) Italy, Piemonte, prov. Cuneo (Alpi Marittime), Mt. Ventoso, below the summit, W-exposed, ca. 44°04′56′′N/7°42′58′′E (L. Muggia and A. Cometto) |
| Tephromela atra | L3697(*63) | |||
| Tephromela atra | L3710(*64) | 2100 | Schistous rocks/cliffs | (41) Italy, Piemonte, prov. Cuneo (Alpi Marittime), Mt. Saccarello, N side below summit, N-exposed, ca. 44°03′45′′N/7°42′43′′E (L. Muggia and A. Cometto) |
| Tephromela atra | L3720 | 2150 | Schist-arenaria rocks | (42) Italy, Piemonte, prov. Cuneo (Alpi Marittime), Mt. Saccarello, few meters S/E of the summit, S-exposed, ca. 43°03′40′′N/7°42′46′′E (L. Muggia and A. Cometto) |
| Tephromela atra | L3722(*65) | |||
| Rhizoplaca cf melanophthalma | L3724(*66) | |||
| Rhizoplaca cf melanophthalma | L3725(*67) | |||
| Tephromela atra | L3820 | 2000 | siliceous rocks | (43) Italy, Friuli Venezia Giulia, prov. Udine, loc. Treppo Carnico, Mt. Paularo, on the crest E of summit, E/N-exposed, ca. 46°34′15′′N/13°02′59′′E (L. Muggia) |
| Tephromela atra | L3821 |
Metadata of the collected lichen specimens: species name, sample ID, and geographic origin, including altitude and type of substrate, are reported.
Culture Isolation of Trebouxia Photobionts
The isolation of photobionts was performed by picking the algal cells from different parts of each selected thallus (107 total thalli). We selected three thallus areolas and three lobes, for T. atra and R. melanophthalma agg., respectively, which were distantly located from each other in the thallus. This procedure aimed at isolating potential intrathalline Trebouxia algae diversity, i.e., multiple algal species coexisting within a single lichen thallus. The thallus surface was washed three times by pipetting a sterile solution of 1% Tween-80 in H2O. The upper cortex of the thallus was removed with a sterile razor blade, and clumps of algal cells were picked from the algal layer with a sterile needle and directly inoculated on Bold Basal Medium (BBM; ; ) and stored in a growth chamber at 20°C, 20 μmol × photons m–2 × s–1, with a light/dark cycle of 14/10 h. Once algal colonies grew to a sufficient biomass (about 1-mm-wide colony), they were individually sub-cultivated on BBM and Trebouxia medium (TM; ). In a second sub-cultivation step, part of the colonies were picked for DNA extraction and molecular sequence identification (see below), morphological analysis, and cryostock preservation. The algal cultures are stored both as fresh living strains and as cryostocks at the Department of Life Sciences, University of Trieste.
Molecular Analyses: DNA Extraction, PCR Amplification, and Sequencing
The total genomic DNA was extracted from both lichen thalli and the isolated photobiont strains following the C-TAB protocol according to . The nuclear internal transcribed spacer of the ribosomal DNA (ITS rDNA) was amplified using the Trebouxia-specific primers ITS1T and ITS4T () using the PCR conditions as in . The PCR products were purified with Mag-Bind® Total Pure NGS and sequenced by Macrogen Europe, Inc. (Amsterdam, Netherlands) using the forward primer ITS1T. Sequence identity was checked with a BLAST search () in the NCBI database and was used to find correspondence between the sequence obtained from the thallus extraction and those obtained from the axenically isolated algal strains coming from the same thallus.
Phylogenetic Analyses
The phylogenetic analyses of Trebouxia photobiont included all the newly obtained ITS sequences, i.e., obtained from the thalli and the axenically isolated photobionts (Supplementary Table 2) and 122 sequences (Supplementary Table 1) selected from the most updated reference dataset of . These latter represent the four main clades of Trebouxia formally recognized so far—clades “A,” “C,” “I,” and “S” (; ; ). All sequences were aligned firstly in a comprehensive dataset selecting Asterochloris glomerata, A. irregularis, Vulcanochloris canariensis, and V. symbiotica as out-groups and including reference sequences of the Trebouxia clades “A,” “C,” “I,” and “S” to recognize to which of the four clades the new sequences belonged. Secondly, for each individual Trebouxia clade—”A,” “I,” and “S” in which the new sequences were recovered (see Results)—a new multiple sequence alignment (MSA) was prepared. The alignments were prepared using MAFFT v7 () with a g-ins-i substitution model and GUIDANCE2 (). The alignments were performed firstly using the MAFFT MSA algorithm with 100 bootstrap replicates (masking columns with confidence scores < 0.95) and secondly manually adjusted in BioEdit v7.2.5 ().
Maximum likelihood (ML) and Bayesian inference (BI) analyses were run for both the whole Trebouxia dataset and the individual clades in the CIPRESS web portal () using the programs RaxML-v8.2.x () and MrBayes v3.2.7a (), respectively. The ML analysis used the GTRGAMMA substitution model, with 1,000 bootstrap replicates. The BI was carried out by setting two parallel runs with six chains over five million generations, starting with a random tree and sampling every 100th step. We discarded the first 25% of the data as burn-in, and the corresponding posterior probabilities (PPs) were calculated from the remaining trees. The phylogenetic trees were visualized in TreeView v1.6.6 ().
We considered to be species-level lineages those clades recovered as individually monophyletic, fully supported and represented by more than two samples [as originally recognized in and ].
Analysis of Geographic Distribution, Altitude, and Intrathalline Co-occurrence of Trebouxia
The diversity of Trebouxia species-level lineages found in our dataset and their geographic distributions were characterized by basic descriptive statistics. Trebouxia species diversity was calculated as the percentage of abundance of each species-level lineage across the geographic areas, arranged according to the continents of origin (Europe, North America, and South America Oceania), and altitudinal ranges (0–1,000, 1,001–1,500, 1,501–2,000, 2,001–2,500, >2,500 m a.s.l.) in which the lichen specimens were collected. Trebouxia lineages represented by only one sequence were not included in the analysis. We calculated for each geographic area and altitudinal range the relative abundances as the number of samples belonging to a certain species-level lineage on the total number of sequences obtained for that sampling site and altitudinal range, respectively, and express it as percentage values.
The percentage of co-occurrence of multiple Trebouxia species in the same thallus was calculated, considering thalli with and without co-occurrence, for which sequence data from thallus extractions and culture isolates differed or were concordant. Patterns of co-occurrence were also analyzed according the altitudinal ranges described about.
Morphological Analyses of Trebouxia (Light Microscopy and Transmission Electron Microscopy)
The analyses were performed on selected specimens identified in the phylogenetic analyses as Trebouxia “A52,” Trebouxia “A02,” and T. vagua “A04” and “A10” (see “Results” section), because we could obtain cultured strains for these species-level lineages which have not been characterized yet. Trebouxia vagua was formally described by Voytsekhovich and Beck (2016), and the morphology of the chloroplast was presented; however, since then, a proper analysis of its ultrastructural traits was lacking.
Light Microscopy was used to study the morphological traits of algal cells grown in cultures (Zeiss Axioscope) using ×400 magnification. Algal cells were picked from the colony and mounted in water, slightly pressing on the cover slide. The samples were photographed with an Axiocam MRc5 (Zeiss) digital camera connected to the microscope, and digital images were documented with the program ThorCam (Axio VS40, Zeiss). TEM was applied to study ultrastructural traits of pyrenoid and chloroplast both on the algae observed within the original thallus and on the corresponding axenically cultured strains. For morphological characterization of both pyrenoid and chloroplast types, we referred to the original classifications of , for pyrenoid types, that of for the chloroplast types, and the recently compiled revision of pyrenoid and chloroplast types done by . The following samples and strains were selected: Trebouxia “A52” thalli L2385, 2388, and 2389 and cultured strains L2906, L2908, L2912, and L2918; Trebouxia “A02” thalli L2421, L2732, and L2796 and cultured strains L2796, L3202, and L3015; T. vagua “A04” cultured strain L2943; and T. vagua “A10” cultured strain L2957.
Single-cell isolation cultures were prepared for the cultured strains before TEM examinations. These cultures were grown 21 days on solid BBM at 20°C according to . After this period, the cells were fixed and dehydrated as described by . In brief, samples were fixed in 2% Karnovsky fixative for 12 h at 4°C, washed three times for 15 min with 0.01 M PBS (pH 7.4), and postfixed with 2% OsO4 in 0.01 M PBS (pH 7.4) for 2 h at room temperature. After being washed in 0.01 M PBS at pH 7.4, the samples were dehydrated at room temperature in a graded series of ethanol starting at 50% and increasing to 70, 95, and 100% for no less than 20–30 min at each step. The samples were embedded in Spurr’s resin according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Ultrathin sections (80 nm) were cut, mounted, and stained with 10% uranyl acetate and 0.1% lead citrate using the “Synaptek Grid-Stick Kit,” as described by . The original lichen thalli were fixed and treated as described for the axenic cultures. The ultrathin sections were observed with a JEOL JEM-1010 (80 kV) electron microscope, equipped with a MegaView III digital camera and “AnalySIS” image acquisition software (SCSIE, University of València).
Results
Phylogenetic Analyses of Trebouxia From Thallus and Cultured Strains
We successfully isolated 212 Trebouxia strains in axenic cultures. These strains came from 94 of the 107 selected thalli (including both Rhizoplaca melanophthalma agg. and Tephromela atra) from 43 distinct localities. DNA extractions and ITS sequencing were successfully obtained for 96 of 107 thalli and for all the 212 axenically isolated strains (Supplementary Table 2).
The phylogeny inferred from ITS sequence data was concordant with the reference phylogeny presented by and recognized the four major Trebouxia clades (Figure 1A). Bayesian and ML analyses were topologically congruent, and full or high-PP and bootstrap supports were obtained for all lineages. The vast majority of the newly obtained photobiont ITS sequences were placed in clades “A,” “I,” and “S.” Only one sequence was recovered in clade “C” (strain L2759) on a single, unsupported branch, and thus, it was excluded from all subsequent analyses. The individual, clade-specific phylogenies (“A,” “I,” and “S”) were also topologically concordant with the reference trees of , and the previously delimited species-level lineages were either fully or highly supported (bootstrap values > 80).
FIGURE 1
Most of the Trebouxia species-level lineage belong to clade “A,” with 170 sequences representing eight lineages as recognized by
FIGURE 2

Phylogenetic hypothesis based on the ITS locus of Trebouxia Clade “A”: the 50% majority rule consensus tree of the Bayesian analysis is presented; ML bootstrap values higher than 70% are reported with bold branches; Bayesian PP values > 0.8 are reported above branches. DNA extraction numbers of the new Trebouxia sequences coming from the original lichen thalli are in italics, while those obtained from the cultured strains are in bold. Correspondence between the original lichen thallus and the axenically isolated Trebouxia strains is indicated by an asterisk and a number in parenthesis (*1–64; as in Supplementary Table 2). Sequences coming from either lichen species are color coded: green for Rhizoplaca melanophthalma and black for Tephromela atra.
Clade “I” was the second most represented Trebouxia clade (Supplementary Figure 1), with 123 sequences coming from both R. melanophthalma and T. atra specimens. The 123 sequences recovered within clade “I” represented two species-level lineages, i.e., T. flava “I03” (54 sequences) and T. impressa “I04” (69 sequences).
The 20 sequences recovered in clade “S” (Supplementary Figure 2) come from both R. melanophthalma and T. atra specimens, and all group into the species-level lineage Trebouxia “S02.” Of these, only one sequence belongs to a cultured strain (L4181), while all the other sequences derive from thalli.
Geographic Diversity of Trebouxia
In our dataset, Trebouxia species-level lineages showed distinct geographic distributions across continents and altitudinal range (Figures 3A,B). In Europe, six Trebouxia species-level lineages were found in Italy and Spain, with T. impressa “I04,” T. flava “I03,” and Trebouxia “S02” being the most frequently sampled species. In North America, six different Trebouxia species were found, and the most frequently sampled species-level lineages were Trebouxia “A02,” T. cretacea “A01/A31,” and T. flava “I03.” In South America, eight Trebouxia species-level lineages were found among Argentina and Chile, with seven found at a single locality in Chile. Here, the most frequent ones were Trebouxia “A02” and the new Trebouxia “A52.” In Oceania, i.e., from the single locality in Tasmania, we found only the two Trebouxia species-level lineages of. T. vagua “A04” and “A10.”
FIGURE 3

Correlation of relative abundance of Trebouxia species-level lineages (OTUs) recovered in thalli of Rhizoplaca melanophthalma and Tephromela atra(A) with the geographic areas according to the continents (Table 1), (B) with the altitudinal ranges (m a.s.l.) at which the lichen samples were collected (Table 1). (C) Percentage of intrathalline co-occurrence of two or more Trebouxia species-level lineages in both R. melanophthalma and T. atra in relation to the altitudinal range.
Trebouxia “A02” and T. impressa “I04” were the most broadly distributed species-level lineages and the most abundant in our dataset, representing 25.9 and 22.2% of the new sequences, respectively (Figures 1, 3A,B). Indeed, Trebouxia “A02” was most common in thalli from North (Idaho, Nevada, and Utah in the United States) and South America (Argentina and Chile), while only a few samples were found in Europe (Spain). In contrast, T. impressa “I04” was more frequent in Europe than in North and South America (Figure 3A). While Trebouxia “A02” was mostly amplified and isolated from thalli collected above 1,500 m a.s.l., T. impressa “I04” was found also in a few thalli collected in the range 0–1,500 m a.s.l. (Figure 3B).
Trebouxia flava “I03” represents 16% of the newly obtained sequences (Figure 1B). This lineage was found frequently in samples from North America (Idaho) and Europe (Italy and Spain), whereas only a few sequences come from South America (Argentina). Trebouxia flava “I03” was mostly recovered from thalli collected at mid-high elevation (above 1,000 m a.s.l.) but absent at sites below 1,000 m a.s.l.
Trebouxia vagua “A04” and “A10” together represent 11% of the newly obtained sequences. Trebouxia vagua “A10” is unique from thalli of both R. melanophthalma and T. atra coming from the South Hemisphere—as it was found only in Chile and Tasmania (i.e., South America and Oceania)—and collected below 1,000 m a.s.l. Trebouxia vagua “A04” instead was also recovered in Argentina and Europe even above 2,000 m a.s.l.
The only previously unsampled species-level lineage Trebouxia “A52” represented ∼7% of the newly obtained sequences (Figure 1B) and was recovered only from thalli of R. melanophthalma coming from two localities in South America (Argentina) between 1,001 and 1,500 m a.s.l. (Figures 3A,B and Table 1, localities n. 1 and 2).
Trebouxia “S02” included about 6.3% of the newly obtained sequences (Figure 1B), and this lineage was present only from samples collected in Europe at sites above 1,500 m a.s.l. (Figures 3A,B).
Trebouxia cretacea “A01/A31” represented ∼6% of the newly obtained sequences (Figure 1B) and was recovered from North and South America (Argentina) and Europe (Spain) at sites above 1,000 m a.s.l. In only one locality in Argentina were the samples collected above 2,500 m.
Trebouxia “A12” (URa4) represented 1.6% of the newly obtained sequences (Figure 1B) and was found only in thalli from North (Idaho) and South America (Argentina) at sites between 1,500 and 2,000 m a.s.l. and in only one samples above 2,500 m a.s.l.
Trebouxia “A08” was the least commonly recovered species-level lineage, representing ∼1% of the new sequences and was found in thalli from North America (Idaho and Utah) at sites between 1,001 and 1,500 m a.s.l. (Figures 1B, 3A,B).
Correspondence Between Thallus and Axenically Isolated Photobionts
At least two, and up to seven, Trebouxia strains isolated from the same original thallus could be sequenced from 48 samples (Supplementary Table 2). Of these, only 12 lichen samples (11 R. melanophthalma and one T. atra) presented unique correspondence between the thallus photobiont and the axenically isolated photobionts (lichen samples L2385, L2452, L2545, L2689, L2705, L2733, L2735, L2802, L3336, L3365, L3419, and L3594). For the remaining 36 lichen samples (26 of R. melanophthalma and 10 of T. atra), we found photobiont correspondence, and in addition, we isolated different Trebouxia species-level lineages for 11 samples. We found no correspondence at all for 25 samples. The lack of correspondence is due to the following two reasons: (i) the isolated strains differed completely from the photobiont amplified from the original thalli (18 samples) and (ii) the photobiont sequence could not be obtained from the original thallus (seven samples) and compared with the successfully isolated strains.
In 56 lichen samples, only one cultured strain could be analyzed, and correspondence was found in 10 samples (Supplementary Table 2). Correspondence could not be assessed for the remaining 46 samples because either the thallus sequence or the sequence of the corresponding cultured strains could not be obtained (failure in either PCR amplification or sequencing). Within our dataset, co-occurrence of at least two Trebouxia species-level lineages—intrathalline photobiont diversity—was observed in 30.7% of the lichen samples (Figure 3C). The highest percentage of co-occurrence is found in thalli collected in the altitudinal range 1,500–2,000 m a.s.l.
Morphology and Ultrastructure Analyses of Trebouxia Species-Level Lineages
Trebouxia “A52” isolates—the previously unsampled species-level lineage—were characterized by regularly coccoid cells of about 15–20 μm diameter (Figures 4A–G) which at maturity form autospores (Figures 4D,H). In LM, the chloroplast occupies almost the whole volume of the cytoplasm forming large lobes, resembling thin branches departing from the central mass (Figures 4A,B,G), which can be attributed to the “deeply lobed” type of chloroplast (
FIGURE 4

Morphology and pyrenoid ultrastructure of Trebouxia “A52” isolated in axenic culture and in the corresponding original thalli. DNA extraction numbers (Table 1 and Supplementary Table 2) identify the samples as follows: (A–C,U) culture L2918(*3); (D–F,W) culture L2906(*2); (G,H,M,V) culture L2903(*2); (I,Q,R) from thallus L2388(*2); (J,K,S,T) from thallus L2385(*1); (L,O,P) from thallus L2389(*3); (N) culture L2912(*1). (A–G) Cultured algal cells observed by light microscopy: arrows indicate the lobes of the chloroplast (central green body) and the nucleus. (H) Asexual autospore cells. (I–W) TEM microphotographs of algal cells: (I–N) detail of pyrenoid ultrastructure of gigantea type; (O–S) algal cells from thallus; (T–W) axenically cultured algae. The letters indicate cytoplasmic inclusion (ci), mycobiont hyphae (h), nucleus (n), pyrenoid (p), starch grain (sg), and cell wall (w); multiple pyrenoid bodies are visible in panels (M,P,Q,U,W). Scale bars: (A–C) 20 μm; (D–F,U) 10 μm; (G,H,O–T,V,W) 5 μm; (M) 2 μm; (I–L,N) 1 μm.
Trebouxia “A02” presents regularly coccoid cells of about 10–15 μm diameter in culture. The chloroplast occupied almost the whole volume of the cytoplasm and forms shallowly elongated lobes (Figures 5A–H), resembling the “shallowly lobed” type of chloroplast (
FIGURE 5

Morphology and pyrenoid ultrastructure of Trebouxia “A02” cells isolated in axenic culture. DNA extraction numbers (Table 1 and Supplementary Table 2) identify the samples as follows: (A–C,E) L3000; (D,H–K) L3015; (F,M–Q) L3202; (G) L3169. (A–H) Algal cells observed by light microscopy; arrows indicate the lobes of the massive central chloroplast. (I–Q) TEM microphotographs: (I,J,L) multiple pyrenoid bodies are visible; (P,Q) detail of pyrenoid ultrastructure of gigantea type. The letters indicate cytoplasmic inclusion (ci), pyrenoid (p), and cell wall (w). Scale bars: (A–H,J) 10 μm; (I,K,M,N) 5 μm; (L) 2 μm; (P,Q) 1 μm.
Trebouxia vagua “A04” presents regularly coccoid cells of about 15–20 μm diameter in culture. The chloroplast occupied most of the volume of the cell and was surrounded by cytoplasmic inclusions that made it hard to distinguish the lobes in LM (Figures 6A–F). The nucleus was confined at one side of the cell, occupying the biggest invagination of the chloroplast (Figures 6A,B,E,F,H). Trebouxia vagua “A04” pyrenoids did not resemble any of the so far identified types in Trebouxia. The pyrenoid was rather extended in the central part of the chloroplast, and thylakoid lamellae were randomly arranged in it, sometimes even undistinguishable. Pyrenoglobules were grouped in clumps, without a regular arrangement (Figures 6G–R). The intrathalline T. vagua “A04” (thallus L2597) could not be compared with the cultured one (L2942; Supplementary Table 2), as the corresponding thallus sequence could not be obtained.
FIGURE 6

Morphology and pyrenoid ultrastructure of the Trebouxia vagua “A04” axenically cultured strain L2943 (Supplementary Table 2). (A–F) Algal cells observed by light microscopy; arrows indicate the lobes of the chloroplast (central green body) and the nucleus. (G–R) TEM microphotographs of algal cells: (N–R) detail of pyrenoid ultrastructure. The letters indicate cytoplasmic inclusion (Ci), nucleus (n), and pyrenoid (p). Scale bars: (A–F) 10 μm; (G–M) 5 μm; (N–R) 2 μm.
Trebouxia vagua “A10” in culture presented coccoid cells of ∼15–20 μm diameter, while bigger cells were roundish to ellipsoid and measured up to 25 μm on the longer axis (Figures 7A–G). The chloroplast massively occupied the cell volume, and its lobe morphology resembled either the curly or the thin-lobed types (sensu
FIGURE 7

Morphology and pyrenoid ultrastructure of the Trebouxia vagua “A10” axenically cultured strain L2957. (A–G) Algal cells observed by light microscopy; arrows indicate the lobes of the chloroplast (central green body). (H–P) TEM microphotographs; (N,O) detail of pyrenoid ultrastructure gigantea type. The letters indicate cytoplasmic inclusion (ci), nucleus (n), and pyrenoid (p). Scale bar: (E,G) 20 μm; (A–D,F) 15 μm; (H–J,M,P) 5 μm; (K,L) 2 μm; (N,O) 1 μm.
Discussion
Phylogenetic and Ecological Species Diversity of Trebouxia
This study explored the diversity of Trebouxia photobionts associated with two lichen-forming fungi—Rhizoplaca melanophthalma and Tephromela atra—originating from environments in remote, exposed areas, at alpine altitudes. There, the lichens thrive under rather extreme ecological conditions and may potentially associate with diverse, ecologically adapted Trebouxia species. Our sampling extended almost over the entire distributional range of the two lichen species worldwide and allowed us to elucidate novel insight into ecological distributions of Trebouxia species in undersampled regions. For this study, lichen thalli were collected mostly in mountain areas over 2,000 m a.s.l.; five localities were above 3,000 m a.s.l. and up to 5,100 m a.s.l. The environmental extremes that characterize all the sampling localities are draught, extremely low and high temperatures, long snow cover over the year, high levels of UV radiation, and oligotrophic conditions.
Across our global sampling, a total of 10 Trebouxia candidate species (species-level lineages) were found to associate with either mycobiont—R. melanophthalma or T. atra. The greatest diversity of Trebouxia species-level lineages was recovered in the altitudinal range 1,000–2,500 m a.s.l. While we found relatively high diversity of Trebouxia species and diverse associations of these with the two mycobionts, only a single, previously unsampled species-level lineages was identified—Trebouxia “A52.” The nine previously recognized candidate species included T. vagua “A04,” T. cretacea “A01/A31,” Trebouxia “A12,” Trebouxia “A08,” Trebouxia “A02,” Trebouxia “A16,” T. impressa “I04,” T. flava “I03,” and Trebouxia “S02” (
Four of the identified species-level lineages in Trebouxia clade “A”—Trebouxia “A08,” Trebouxia “A12,” Trebouxia “A16,” and Trebouxia “A52”—were recovered exclusively as partners of R. melanophthalma. Trebouxia “A08” together with Trebouxia “A02” and T. cretacea is an already-known photobiont of R. melanophthalma based on samples collected in North America and Asia (
Our results revealed that members of the R. melanophthalma agg. also associate with T. vagua “A04,” Trebouxia “A16,” Trebouxia “A12,” Trebouxia “A52,” and T. flava “I03.” In particular, the newly recovered species-level lineage Trebouxia “A52” was isolated and directly amplified from thalli collected in only three, very dry localities in Argentina (localities n. 1, 2, 3) on basaltic/volcanic rocks. While R. melanophthalma represents a species complex comprising multiple, distinct mycobiont species-level lineages (
Six species-level lineages of Trebouxia were found in association with the mycobiont T. atra (T. vagua “A04,” T. vagua “A10,” Trebouxia “A02,” T. flava “I03,” T. impressa “I04,” and Trebouxia “S02”). We highlight here that T. atra associates with a more diverse range of Trebouxia species than previously reported (
Within Trebouxia clade “S,” Trebouxia “S02” was the only species-level lineage detected, and it was mainly amplified from the thalli of T. atra, while only two sequences were derived from R. melanophthalma. Of these, only two thalli came from a mountain massif in Spain, while all the other samples were collected on the Italian Alps. Trebouxia belonging to clade “S” and more specifically to the T. simplex and Trebouxia “S02” lineages have already been documented in Alpine lichens (
The phylogenetic species diversity of Trebouxia detected here corresponds with the evolutionary pathways traversed by its four major clades to occupy varied climatic and vegetative regimes, as recently described by
Intrathalline Diversity of Trebouxia and Morphoanatomical Species Characterization
Co-occurrence of Trebouxia photobionts within the same lichen thallus has been recognized to be a common phenomenon for many years (
While more recent analyses highlighted photobiont co-occurrence using DNA metabarcoding data (
The multiplicity of algal partners inside a thallus may be interpreted in the light of different symbiotic strategies and flexibility of the symbionts. Indeed, the potential of a lichen mycobiont to host multiple intrathalline photobionts (
Furthermore, in this study, we also show that a detailed analysis of pyrenoid ultrastructure is key in assessing the multiplicity of Trebouxia photobionts within thalli. Indeed, as shown for the sample R. melanophthalma L2796, the TEM analyses performed on its thallus evidenced the presence of Trebouxia cells with two pyrenoid types, i.e., gigantea type and impressa type. The sequence obtained from thallus L2796 identified the taxon as Trebouxia “A12,” while the cultured strains were identified as Trebouxia “A02” and T. impressa (Supplementary Table 2). The impressa-type pyrenoid likely corresponds to cells of T. impressa seen in the thallus, but cells with gigantea-type pyrenoid may correspond either to the cultured Trebouxia “A02” or to the thallus-sequenced Trebouxia “A12.” Our TEM analyses conducted on axenically isolated Trebouxia “A02” confirm that it has the gigantea-type pyrenoid. However, we cannot exclude that Trebouxia “A12” also bears the same gigantea-type pyrenoid, as we could not isolate this photobiont in culture.
Cell morphology and ultrastructure characterization emerges once more as a decisive approach for the comprehensive identification of Trebouxia species. Here, we succeeded in isolating and morphologically characterizing two strains, Trebouxia “A02” and Trebouxia “A52,” which are well-supported, monophyletic species-level lineages in Trebouxia clade A and will merit formal species description. However, we refrain to proceed with species description at this stage as further data from still-ongoing research (
The presence of multiple trebouxioid taxa within the lichen thalli merits additional consideration, particularly regarding common technical problems related to the formation of chimeric sequences. Indeed, we are aware that the presence of mixed DNA from several different Trebouxia taxa within the lichen thalli and/or even in the isolated cultures analyzed could generate a mixed template of the ITS genetic fragments. This could potentially lead to the formation of chimeric sequences that are subsequently amplified in PCR and generate bias in the interpretation of the results. Such troubles could be overcome by cloning or high-throughput sequencing (HTS) approaches, which would detect with a higher accuracy the different ITS sequences. However, this kind of approach was not contemplated in the present study as it will be presented subsequently in a broader context in a future contribution.
In conclusion, the integrative taxonomic approach that has been applied here shed light on the diversity of Trebouxia in remote areas characterized by ecological extremes, further strengthening the importance of performing detailed studies on this ecologically adapted and widespread lichen photobiont genus.
Publisher’s Note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Statements
Data availability statement
The data presented in the study are deposited in the GenBank repository, accession number OM275483 – OM275791. The original contributions presented in the study are incluted in the article/Supplementary Material, further questions can be directed to the corresponding author.
Author contributions
LM, SL, and MG designed the study. LM, AC, and SL performed the sampling. RD and AC performed the culture isolation. RD performed the molecular analyses. PM and EB performed the microscopy analyses. LM, RD, SL, and MT wrote the manuscript. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.
Funding
This study was funded by the Italian Ministry of University and Research (MUR, Ministero dell’Università e della Ricerca) project PRIN2017 (project code 20177559A5) assigned to LM and by the Prometeo Excellence in Research Program (Generalitat Valenciana, Spain) (PROMETEO/2017/039; PROMETEO/2021/005) assigned to EB.
Acknowledgments
We thank Julieta Orlando and Diego Leiva (Chile), Sergio Perez Ortega (Span), Gintera Kantvilas (Tasmania), Damien Erzt (Belgium), and Angel E. Armesto (Argentina) for their help in the sampling and Cesar Bordenave for constructive discussions.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Supplementary material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2022.809804/full#supplementary-material
Supplementary Figure 1Phylogenetic hypothesis based on the ITS locus of Trebouxia Clade “I”: the 50% majority rule consensus tree of the Bayesian analysis is presented; ML bootstrap values higher than 70% are reported with bold branches; Bayesian PP values > 0.8 are reported above branches. DNA extraction numbers of the new Trebouxia sequences coming from the original lichen thalli are in italics, while those obtained from the cultured strains are in bold. Correspondence between the original lichen thallus and the axenically isolated Trebouxia strains is indicated by an asterisk and a number in parenthesis (*1–64; as in Supplementary Table 2). Sequences coming from either lichen species are color coded: green for Rhizoplaca melanophthalma and black for Tephromela atra. Polyphyletic species-level lineage I01 is identified according to
Phylogenetic hypothesis based on the ITS locus of Trebouxia Clade “S”: the 50% majority rule consensus tree of the Bayesian analysis is presented; ML bootstrap values higher than 70% are reported with bold branches, and Bayesian PP values > 0.8 are reported above branches. DNA extraction numbers of the new Trebouxia sequences coming from the original lichen thalli are in italics, while those obtained from the cultured strains are in bold. Correspondence between the original lichen thallus and the corresponding axenically isolated Trebouxia strains is indicated by an asterisk and a number in parenthesis (*1–64; as in Supplementary Table 2). Sequences coming from either lichen species are color coded: green for Rhizoplaca melanophthalma and black for Tephromela atra. Polyphyletic species-level lineage S02 is identified according to
Trebouxia sequences retrieved from GenBank and included in the phylogenetic analyses of Figure 1 and Supplementary Figures 1, 2 are reported with their OTU ID (according to
NCBI accession numbers are reported for the ITS sequences of Trebouxia species-level lineage identified directly from thallus sequencing (thallus ID) and from axenically isolated cultured strains (culture isolates ID). TSB herbarium number is reported for the original lichen samples.
References
1
AhmadjianV. (1967). A guide to the algae occurring as lichen symbionts: isolation, culture, cultural physiology, and identification.Phycologia6127–160. 10.2216/i0031-8884-6-2-127.1
2
AltschulS. F.GishW.MillerW.MyersE. W.LipmanD. J. (1990). Basic local alignment search tool.J. Mol. Biol.215403–410. 10.1016/S0022-2836(05)80360-2
3
BeckA.KasalickyT.RamboldG. (2002). Myco-photobiontal selection in a Mediterranean cryptogam community with Fulgensia fulgida.New Phytol.153317–326. 10.1046/j.0028-646x.2001.00315.x
4
BischoffH. W.BoldH. C. (1963). Phycological Studies IV. Some Soil Algae from Enchanted Rock and Related Algal Species.Univeristy of Texas Publication 6318. Austin, TX: University of Texas, 1–95.
5
BlahaJ.BalochE.GrubeM. (2006). High photobiont diversity associated with the euryoecious lichen-forming ascomycete Lecanora rupicola.Biol. J. Linn. Soc.88283–293.
6
BoldH. C. (1949). The morphology of Chlamydomonas chlamydogama sp. nov.Bull. Torrey Bot. Club76101–108. 10.2307/2482218
7
BordenaveC. D.MuggiaL.ChivaS.LeavittS. D.CarrascoP.BarrenoE. (2022). Chloroplast morphology and pyrenoid ultrastructural analyses reappraise the diversity of the lichen phycobiont genus Trebouxia (Chlorophyta).Algal Res.61:102561. 10.1016/j.algal.2021.102561
8
CasanoL. M.del CampoE. M.García-BreijoF. J.Reig-ArmiñanaJ.GasullaF.del HoyoA.et al (2011). Two Trebouxia algae with different physiological performances are ever-present in lichen thalli of Ramalina farinacea. Coexistence versus competition?Environ. Microbiol.13806–818. 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2010.02386.x
9
CatalàS.del CampoE. M.BarrenoE.García-BreijoF. J.Reig-Armi]ñanaJ.CasanoL. M. (2016). Coordinated ultrastructural and phylogenomic shed light on the hidden phycobiont diversity of the Trebouxia microalgae in Ramalina fraxinea.Mol. Phylogenet. Evol.94765–777. 10.1016/j.ympev.2015.10.021
10
ChagnonP. L.MagainN.MiadlikowskaJ.LutzoniF. (2019). Species diversification and phylogenetically constrained symbiont switching generated high modularity in the lichen genus Peltigera.J. Ecol.1071645–1661. 10.1111/1365-2745.13207
11
CuberoO. F.CrespoA.FatehiJ.BridgeP. D. (1999). DNA extraction and PCR amplification method suitable for fresh, herbarium stored and lichenized fungi.Plant Syst. Evol.217243–249. 10.1007/BF01084401
12
FriedlT. (1989a). Comparative ultrastructure of pyrenoids in Trebouxia (Microthamniales, Chlorophyta).Plant Syst. Evol.164145–159.
13
FriedlT. (1989b). Systematik und Biologie von Trebouxia (Microthamniales, Chlorophyta) als Phycobiont der Parmeliaceae (lichenisierte Ascomyceten).Bayreuth: Universität Bayreuth.
14
Garrido-BenaventI.Pérez-OrtegaS.de los RíosA.Fernández-MendozaF. (2020). Amphitropical variation of the algal partners of Pseudephebe (Parmeliaceae, lichenized fungi).Symbiosis8235–48. 10.1007/s13199-020-00709-5
15
GrubeM.AschenbrennerI.CernavaT.BergG. (2016). “Lichen-bacterial interactions,” in Environmental and Microbial Relationships, edsDruzhininaI. S.KubicekC. P. (Cham: Springer International Publishing), 179–188. 10.1007/978-3-319-29532-9
16
HallT. A. (1999). BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT.Nucleic Acids Symp. Ser.4195–98.
17
HawksworthD. L.GrubeM. (2020). Lichens redefined as complex ecosystems.New Phytol.2271281–1283. 10.1111/nph.16630
18
HoneggerR. (2012). “The symbiotic phenotype of lichen-forming ascomycetes and their endo- and epibionts,” in Fungal Association. The Mycota – A Comprehensive Treatise on Fungi as Experimental System for Basic and Applied Research, 2nd Edn, Vol. IX, ed.EsserK. (Berlin: Springer), 288–339.
19
HuelsenbeckJ. P.RonquistF. (2001). MRBAYES: Bayesian inference of phylogenetic trees.Bioinformatics17754–755. 10.1093/bioinformatics/17.8.754
20
KatohK.MisawaK.KumaK.MiyataT. (2002). MAFFT: a novel method for rapid multiple sequence alignment based on fast Fourier transform.Nucleic Acid Res.303059–3066. 10.1093/nar/gkf436
21
KozlovA. M.DarribaD.FlouriT.MorelB.StamatakisA. (2019). RAxML-NG: a fast, scalable and user-friendly tool for maximum likelihood phylogenetic inference.Bioinformatics354453–4455. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btz305
22
KrokenS.TaylorJ. W. (2000). Phylogenetic species, reproductive mode, and specificity of the green alga Trebouxia forming lichens with the fungal genus Letharia.Bryologist103645–660. 10.1639/0007-2745(2000)103[0645:psrmas]2.0.co;2
23
LeavittS. D.Fernández-MendozaF.Pérez-OrtegaS.SohrabiM.DivakarP. K.VondrákJ.et al (2013b). Local representation of global diversity in a cosmopolitan lichen-forming fungal species complex (Rhizoplaca, Ascomycota).J. Biogeogr.401792–1806. 10.1111/jbi.12118
24
LeavittS. D.NelsenM. P.LumbschH. T.JohnsonL. A.St. ClairL. L. S. (2013c). Symbiont flexibility in subalpine rock shieldlichen communities in the southwestern USA.Bryologist116149–161.
25
LeavittS. D.Fernández-MendozaF.Pérez-OrtegaS.SohrabiM.DivakarP.LumbschT.et al (2013a). DNA barcode identification of lichen-forming fungal species in the Rhizoplaca melanophthalma species-complex (Lecanorales, Lecanoraceae), including five new species.MycoKeys71–22. 10.3897/mycokeys.7.4508
26
LeavittS. D.KraichakE.NelsenM. P.AltermannS.DivakarP. K.AlorsD.et al (2015). Fungal specificity and selectivity for algae play a major role in determining lichen partnerships across diverse ecogeographic regions in the lichen-forming family Parmeliaceae (Ascomycota).Mol. Ecol.243779–3797. 10.1111/mec.13271
27
LeavittS. D.KraichakE.VondrakJ.NelsenM. P.SohrabiM.Pérez-OrtegaS.et al (2016). Cryptic diversity and symbiont interactions in rock-posy lichens.Mol. Phylogenet. Evol.99261–274. 10.1016/j.ympev.2016.03.030
28
LückingR.HodkinsonB. P.LeavittS. D. (2016). The 2016 classification of lichenized fungi in the Ascomycota and Basidiomycota – Approaching one thousand genera.Bryologist119361–416. 10.1639/0007-2745-119.4.361
29
MedeirosD.MazurE.MiadlikowskaJ.FlakusA.Rodriguez-FlakusP.Pardo-De la HozC. J.et al (2021). Turnover of lecanoroid mycobionts and their Trebouxia photobionts along an elevation gradient in Bolivia highlights the role of environment in structuring the lichen symbiosis.Front. Microbiol.12:774839. 10.3389/fmicb.2021.774839
30
MiadlikowskaJ.KauffF.HofstetterV.FrakerE.GrubeM.HafellnerJ.et al (2006). New insights into classification and evolution of the Lecanoromycetes (Pezizomycotina, Ascomycota) from phylogenetic analyses of three ribosomal RNA- and two protein-coding genes.Mycologia981088–1103. 10.1080/15572536.2006.11832636
31
MillerM. A.PfeifferW.SchwartzT. (2010). “Creating the CIPRES Science Gateway for inference of large phylogenetic trees,” in Proceedings of the Gateway Computing Environments Workshop (GCE), 14 Nov. 2010, New Orleans, LA, 1–8.
32
MolinsA.ChivaS.CalatayudÁMarcoF.García-BreijoF.Reig-ArmiñanaJ.et al (2020). Multidisciplinary approach to describe Trebouxia diversity within lichenized fungi Buellia zoharyi from the Canary Islands.Symbiosis8219–34. 10.1007/s13199-020-00722-8
33
MolinsA.MoyaP.Garcia-BreijoF. J.Reig-ArmiñanaJ.BarrenoE. (2018a). A multitool approach to assess microalgal diversity in lichens: isolation, Sanger sequencing, HTS and ultrastructural correlations.Lichenologist50123–138. 10.1017/S0024282917000664
34
MolinsA.MoyaP.García-BreijoF. J.Reig-ArmiñanaJ.BarrenoE. (2018b). Molecular and morphological diversity of Trebouxia microalgae in sphaerothalloid Circinaria spp. lichens.J. Phycol.54494–504. 10.1111/jpy.12751
35
MolinsA.MoyaP.MuggiaL.BarrenoE. (2021). Thallus growth stage and geographic origin shape microalgal diversity in Ramalina farinacea lichen holobionts.J. Phycol.57975–987. 10.1111/jpy.13140
36
MoyaP.ChivaS.MolinsA.Garrido-BenaventI.BarrenoE. (2021). Unravelling the symbiotic microalgal diversity in Buellia zoharyi (Lichenized Ascomycota) from the Iberian Peninsula and Balearic Islands using DNA metabarcoding.Diversity13:220. 10.3390/d13060220
37
MoyaP.ChivaS.MolinsA.JadrnáI.ŠkaloudP.PeksaO.et al (2018). Myrmecia israeliensis as the primary symbiotic microalga in squamulose lichens growing in European and Canary Island terricolous communities.Fottea1872–85. 10.5507/fot.2017.022
38
MoyaP.MolinsA. A.Ânez-AlberolaF. M.MuggiaL.BarrenoE. (2017). Unexpected associated microalgal diversity in the lichen Ramalina farinacea is uncovered by pyrosequencing analyses.PLoS One12:e0175091. 10.1371/journal.pone.0175091
39
MoyaP.MolinsA.ChivaS.BastidaJ.BarrenoE. (2020). Symbiotic microalgal diversity within lichenicolous lichens and crustose hosts on Iberian Peninsula gypsum biocrusts.Sci. Rep.10:14060. 10.1038/s41598-020-71046-2
40
MuggiaL.GrubeM.TretiachM. (2008). Genetic diversity and photobiont associations in selected taxa of the Tephromela atra group (Lecanorales, lichenised Ascomycota).Mycol. Progress7147–160. 10.1007/s11557-008-0560-6
41
MuggiaL.LeavittS. D.BarrenoE. (2018). The hidden diversity of lichenized Trebouxiophyceae (Chlorophyta).Phycologia57503–524. 10.2216/17-134.1
42
MuggiaL.NelsenM. P.KirikaP. M.BarrenoE.BeckA.LindgrenH.et al (2020). Formally described species woefully underrepresent phylogenetic diversity in the common lichen photobiont genus Trebouxia (Trebouxiophyceae,Chlorophyta): an impetus for developing an integrated taxonomy.Mol. Phylog. Evol.149:106821. 10.1016/j.ympev.2020.106821
43
MuggiaL.Pérez-OrtegaS.FrydayA.SpribilleT.GrubeM. (2014a). Global assessment of genetic variation and phenotypic plasticity in the lichen-forming species Tephromela atra.Fungal Div.64233–251. 10.1007/s13225-013-0271-4
44
MuggiaL.Pérez-OrtegaS.KopunT.ZellnigG.GrubeM. (2014b). Photobiont selectivity leads to ecological tolerance and evolutionary divergence in a polymorphic complex of lichenized fungi.Ann. Bot.114463–475. 10.1093/aob/mcu146
45
MuggiaL.ZellnigG.RabensteinerJ.GrubeM. (2010). Morphological and phylogenetic study of algal partners associated with the lichen-forming fungus Tephromela atra from the Mediterranean region.Symbiosis51149–160. 10.1007/s13199-010-0060-8
46
NelsenM. P.LeavittS. D.HellerK.MuggiaL.LumbschH. T. (2021). Macroecological diversification and convergence in a clade of keystone symbionts.FEMS Microbiol. Ecol.97:fiab072. 10.1093/femsec/fiab072
47
NyatiS.ScherrerS.WerthS.HoneggerR. (2014). Green-algal photobiont diversity (Trebouxia spp.) in representatives of Teloschistaceae (Lecanoromycetes, lichenforming ascomycetes).Lichenologist46189–212. 10.1017/S0024282913000819
48
PageR. D. M. (1996). TREEVIEW: an application to display phylogenetic trees on personal computers.Comput. Appl. Biosci.12357–358. 10.1093/bioinformatics/12.4.357
49
PaulF.OtteJ.SchmittI.Dal GrandeF. (2018). Comparing Sanger sequencing and high throughput metabarcoding for inferring photobiont diversity in lichens.Sci. Rep.8:8624. 10.1038/s41598-018-26947-8
50
PeksaO.ŠkaloudP. (2011). Do photobionts influence the ecology of lichens? A case study of environmental preferences in symbiotic green alga Asterochloris (Trebouxiophyceae).Mol. Ecol.203936–3948. 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2011.05168.x
51
Pérez-OrtegaS.Ortiz-ÁlvarezR.GreenT. A.de los RíosA. (2012). Lichen myco- and photobiont diversity and their relationships at the edge of life (McMurdo Dry Valleys, Antarctica).FEMS Microbiol. Ecol.82429–448. 10.1007/s00300-020-02754-8
52
RodriguezR.HensonJ.Van VolkenburghE.HoyM.WrightL.BeckwithF.et al (2008). Stress tolerance in plants via habitat-adapted symbiosis.ISME J.2404–416. 10.1038/ismej.2007.106
53
RuprechtU.BrunauerG.PrintzenC. (2012). Genetic diversity of photobionts in Antarctic lecideoid lichens from an ecological viewpoint.Lichenologist44661–678. 10.1017/S0024282912000291
54
RuprechtU.Fernández-MendozaF.TürkR.FrydayA. (2020). High levels of endemism and local differentiation in the fungal and algal symbionts of saxicolous lecideoid lichens along a latitudinal gradient in southern South America.Lichenologist52287–303. 10.1017/S0024282920000225
55
SelaI.AshkenazyH.KatohK.PupkoT. (2015). GUIDANCE2: accurate detection of unreliable alignment regions accounting for the uncertainty of multiple parameters.Nucleic Acids Res.43W7–W14. 10.1093/nar/gkv318
56
ŠkaloudP.SteinovaJ.RidkaT.VančurovaL.PeksaO. (2015). Assembling the challenging puzzle of algal biodiversity: species delimitation within the genus Asterochloris (Trebouxiophyceae, Chlorophyta).J. Phycol.51507–527. 10.1111/jpy.12295
57
SmithH. B.Dal GrandeF.MuggiaL.KeulerR.DivakarP. K.GreweF.et al (2020). Metagenomic data reveal diverse fungal and algal communities associated with the lichen symbiosis.Symbiosis82133–147. 10.1007/s13199-020-00699-4
58
SteinovaJ.ŠkaloudP.BestováH.YahrR.MuggiaL. (2019). Reproductive and dispersal strategies shape the diversity of mycobiont-photobiont association in Cladonia lichens.Mol. Phyloget. Evol.134226–237. 10.1016/j.ympev.2019.02.014
59
VoytsekhovichA.BeckA. (2016). Lichen photobionts of the rocky outcrops of Karadag massif (Crimean Peninsula).Symbiosis689–24. 10.1007/s13199-015-0346-y
60
WagnerM.BathkeA. C.CaryS. C.GreenT. A.JunkerR. R.TrutschnigW.et al (2020). Myco-and photobiont associations in crustose lichens in the McMurdo Dry Valleys (Antarctica) reveal high differentiation along an elevational gradient.Polar Biol.431967–1983. 10.1007/s00300-020-02754-8
61
WerthS.SorkV. L. (2014). Ecological specialization in Trebouxia (Trebouxiophyceae) photobionts of Ramalina menziesii (Ramalinaceae) across six range-covering ecoregions of western North America.Am. J. Bot.1011127–1140. 10.3732/ajb.1400025
62
XuM.De BoerH.OlafsdottirE. S.OmarsdottirS.HeidmarssonS. (2020). Phylogenetic diversity of the lichenized algal genus Trebouxia (Trebouxiophyceae, Chlorophyta): a new lineage and novel insights from fungal-algal association patterns of Icelandic cetrarioid lichens (Parmeliaceae, Ascomycota).Bot. J. Linn. Soc.194460–468. 10.1093/botlinnean/boaa050
63
YahrR.VilgalysR.De PriestP. T. (2006). Geographic variation in algal partners of Cladonia subtenuis (Cladoniaceae) highlights the dynamic nature of a lichen symbiosis.New Phytol.171847–860. 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2006.01792.x
64
YahrR.VilgalysR.DePriestP. T. (2004). Strong fungal specificity and selectivity for algal symbionts in Florida scrub Cladonia lichens.Mol. Ecol.133367–3378. 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2004.02350.x
Summary
Keywords
chloroplast morphology, culture, phylogeny, Rhizoplaca, Tephromela, Trebouxia
Citation
De Carolis R, Cometto A, Moya P, Barreno E, Grube M, Tretiach M, Leavitt SD and Muggia L (2022) Photobiont Diversity in Lichen Symbioses From Extreme Environments. Front. Microbiol. 13:809804. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.809804
Received
14 November 2021
Accepted
27 January 2022
Published
29 March 2022
Volume
13 - 2022
Edited by
Valentina Fiorilli, University of Turin, Italy
Reviewed by
Soon Gyu Hong, Korea Polar Research Institute, South Korea; Christoph Scheidegger, Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research (WSL), Switzerland; Jouko Rikkinen, University of Helsinki, Finland
Updates

Check for updates
Copyright
© 2022 De Carolis, Cometto, Moya, Barreno, Grube, Tretiach, Leavitt and Muggia.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Lucia Muggia, lmuggia@units.it, lucia_muggia@hotmail.com
This article was submitted to Microbe and Virus Interactions with Plants, a section of the journal Frontiers in Microbiology
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.