Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Microbiol., 26 April 2023
Sec. Microbe and Virus Interactions with Plants
This article is part of the Research Topic Bacterial Wilt: Pathogenic Mechanism, Disease Control, Bacteria-Plant and Bacteria-Environmental Microorganism Interactions View all 6 articles

Functional characterization of two 3-dehydroquinases of AroQ1 and AroQ2 in the shikimate pathway and expression of genes for the type III secretion system in Ralstonia solanacearum

\r\nQingshan Zhang&#x;Qingshan Zhang1Bofan Wu&#x;Bofan Wu1Liangliang HanLiangliang Han1Duan YuDuan Yu2Tao LiangTao Liang2Yan Wang
Yan Wang2*Tao GuoTao Guo1
  • 1College of Resources and Environment, Southwest University, Chongqing, China
  • 2Chongqing Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Chongqing, China

The shikimate pathway is a general route for the biosynthesis of aromatic amino acids (AAAs) in many microorganisms. A 3-dehydroquinase, AroQ, controls the third step of the shikimate pathway that catalyzes the formation of 3-dehydroquinate from 3-dehydroshikimate via a trans-dehydration reaction. Ralstonia solanacearum harbors two 3-dehydroquinases, AroQ1 and AroQ2, sharing 52% similarity in amino acids. Here, we demonstrated that two 3-dehydroquinases, AroQ1 and AroQ2, are essential for the shikimate pathway in R. solanacearum. The growth of R. solanacearum was completely diminished in a nutriment-limited medium with the deletion of both aroQ1 and aroQ2, while substantially impaired in planta. The aroQ1/2 double mutant was able to replicate in planta but grew slowly, which was ~4 orders of magnitude less than the parent strain to proliferate to the maximum cell densities in tomato xylem vessels. Moreover, the aroQ1/2 double mutant failed to cause disease in tomato and tobacco plants, whereas the deletion of either aroQ1 or aroQ2 did not alter the growth of R. solanacearum or pathogenicity on host plants. Supplementary shikimic acid (SA), an important intermediate of the shikimate pathway, substantially restored the diminished or impaired growth of aroQ1/2 double mutant in a limited medium or inside host plants. The necessity of AroQ1 and AroQ2 on the pathogenicity of solanacearum toward host plants was partially due to insufficient SA inside host plants. Moreover, the deletion of both aroQ1 and aroQ2 significantly impaired the expression of genes for the type III secretion system (T3SS) both in vitro and in planta. Its involvement in the T3SS was mediated through the well-characterized PrhA signaling cascade and was independent of growth deficiency under nutrient-limited conditions. Taken together, R. solanacearum 3-dehydroquinases play important roles in bacterial growth, the expression of the T3SS, and pathogenicity in host plants. These results could extend our insights into the understanding of the biological function of AroQ and the sophisticated regulation of the T3SS in R. solanacearum.

Introduction

Ralstonia solanacearum is a soil-borne plant pathogenic bacterium that is a causal agent of bacterial wilt on over 450 plant species belonging to 50 botanical families worldwide and causes severe economic losses in many economically important crops, such as tomato, eggplant, potato, tobacco, and banana worldwide (Mansfield et al., 2012; Jiang et al., 2017). The infection process of R. solanacearum toward host plants involves several stages, including soil survival and moving to host rhizosphere soil, root attachment, colonization of root cortex, moving into developing vascular bundles, and spreading systemically into xylem vessel (McGarvey et al., 1999; Caldwell et al., 2017). In the xylem vessel, R. solanacearum proliferates vigorously and produces a huge number of exopolysaccharides slime (EPS) that aids in bacterial adhesion and biofilm formation, further facilitating the colonization of plant tissues, and blocks the water-transporting system, leading to severe water-transport obstruction, characteristic wilting symptoms, and plant death (Roberts et al., 1988; Lowe-Power et al., 2018). At the early stage of infection, especially at root attachment, R. solanacearum uses a syringe-like type III secretion system (T3SS) to inject virulence factors (so-called type III effectors, T3Es) into host cytosol that usurps and subvert host defense to facilitate bacterial survival and multiplication within host tissues (Genin and Denny, 2012; Coll and Valls, 2013; Deng et al., 2017; Landry et al., 2020). The T3SS in R. solanacearum is encoded by 22 genes forming a hrp regulon that is greatly conserved among Ralstonia solanacearum species complex (RSSC), which is extremely heterogeneous and includes R. solanacearum and closely related species of R. syzygii, R. pickettii, and banana blood disease bacterium (Fegan and Prior, 2005; Genin and Denny, 2012; Coll and Valls, 2013). Transcription of the T3SS and abundant T3Es genes in RSSC is directly controlled by a key regulator HrpB, an AraC-type of transcriptional regulator, which binds directly to the hrpII motif in promoters (Cunnac et al., 2004; Mukaihara et al., 2010). Transcription of hrpB and T3SS genes is activated by host plants or some mimic plant signals, but it is not initiated in nutrient-rich conditions (Arlat et al., 1992; Zhang et al., 2013). Two close paralogs, HrpG and PrhG, which are the OmpR/PhoB family of response regulators of two-component systems (TCSs), positively regulate the expression of hrpB and the T3SS genes in parallel ways (Valls et al., 2006; Plener et al., 2010; Zhang et al., 2013). Different from the expressional characteristic of hrpB and the T3SS, HrpG and PrhG are well-expressed under nutrient-rich conditions, which can respond to host signals or mimic signals by phosphorylation and then initiate transcriptional regulation on downstream hrpB gene (Yoshimochi et al., 2009a,b; Plener et al., 2010; Zhang et al., 2013). HrpG responds to host signals and plays essential roles in host invasion, colonization, and pathogenicity, while PrhG responds to some metabolic signals and contributes partially to host colonization and pathogenicity (Plener et al., 2010; Zhang et al., 2013; Pedro-Jove et al., 2021). Host plant signals or mimic signals are perceived by an outer membrane protein PrhA and transferred to HrpG via a signaling cascade of PrhA-PrhI/R-PrhJ, while it remains unclear how PrhG responds to its signals (Valls et al., 2006; Pedro-Jove et al., 2021). Intriguingly, a global virulence regulator PhcA, which is a LysR-type transcriptional regulator and is quorum sensing-dependent, regulates the expression of hrpG and prhG in a contrasting way. PhcA represses prhIR expression at high cells density by binding its promoter and it in turn negatively regulates hrpG and hrpB expressions, while PhcA positively regulates prhG expression through some novel pathways (Genin et al., 2005; Yoshimochi et al., 2009a; Zhang et al., 2013, 2015). R. solanacearum might switch from using HrpG to PrhG to activate hrpB expression in a cell density-dependent manner (Zhang et al., 2013).

We previously demonstrated that two DAHP synthases, AroG1 and AroG2, are essential for the biosynthesis of aromatic amino acids (AAAs), L-phenylalanine (Phe), L-tyrosine (Tyr), and L-tryptophan (Trp) in R. solanacearum. Furthermore, they play an important role in the T3SS expression, and their impact on the T3SS is mediated through the well-characterized PrhA-HrpG signaling cascade. The shikimate pathway is a general route for AAAs biosynthesis in many microorganisms that consists of seven steps beginning with the condensation of erythrose 4-phosphate (E4P) and phosphoenolpyruvate (E4P) and ending with the chorismate formation (Sprenger, 2006; Maeda and Dudareva, 2012). DAHP synthases AroG controls the first step in the shikimate pathway that catalyzes the formation of 3-deoxy-D-arabino-heptulosonate-7-phosphate (DAHP) by the condensation of E4P and PEP in many microorganisms (Ogino et al., 1982; Herrmann, 1983). Chorismate is a common precursor leading to the biosynthesis of three AAA and some derivatives, such as vitamin K, ubiquinone, and folic acid (Bentley, 1990; Dosselaere and Vanderleyden, 2001; Gosset et al., 2001). We focused on synthetases in the shikimate pathway, 3-dehydroquinase, i.e., AroQ, which controls the third step of the shikimate pathway and catalyzes the formation of 3-dehydroquinate from 3-dehydroshikimate via a trans-dehydration reaction (Herrmann and Weaver, 1999; Sprenger, 2006; Maeda and Dudareva, 2012). With genome searching, two 3-dehydroquinases, AroQ1 (RSc2785, 156 amino acids) and AroQ2 (RSp1397, 154 amino acids), were annotated in the genome of R. solanacearum GMI1000, which share 52% identity on amino acids. We here focused on AroQ1 and AroQ2 to elucidate their functional roles on the shikimate pathway, the T3SS expression, and pathogenicity in R. solanacearum.

Materials and methods

Bacterial strains and culture conditions

The bacterial strains used in this study are listed in Table 1. R. solanacearum strains were derivatives of OE1-1, a phylotype I, race 1, and biovar 4 pathogenic strain on tomato and tobacco plants (Kanda et al., 2003). E. coli strains of DH12S and S17-1 were grown at 37°C in the Luria–Bertani medium and used for plasmid construction and conjugation, respectively. R. solanacearum strains were grown at 28°C in a nutrient-rich B medium or a minimal medium (Hoagland medium with 2% of sucrose, also used as a hrp-inducing medium; Yoshimochi et al., 2009b).

TABLE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. Bacterial strains used in this study.

Mutant generation with an in-frame deletion of target genes

Target genes were in-frame deleted via pK18mobsacB-based homolog recombination as described previously, which is a mark-free and appropriate for multiple deletions of a subset of target genes in R. solanacearum (Zhang et al., 2015; Lei et al., 2020). In brief, DNA fragment flanking both ends of the target gene was conjugated with a joint PCR and sub-cloned into pK18mobsacB. The desired plasmid was transferred into R. solanacearum strains by conjugation with E. coli S17-1, and generated mutants were confirmed by colony PCR with respective primer pairs (Supplementary Table 1).

Complementation analyses

Genetic complementation was performed with a Tn7-based site-specific chromosomal integration system as described previously (Zhang et al., 2015, 2021). In brief, the DNA fragment containing the coding sequence of the target gene and its upstream region of about 500 bp (empirically harboring its native promoter) was PCR amplified and cloned into pUC18-mini-Tn7T-Gm (Choi et al., 2005). After validating the sequence, the target DNA fragment was integrated into the chromosome of corresponding mutants at 25-bp of glmS downstream as monocopy that was confirmed by colony PCR with primer pair of glmsdown and Tn7R (Zhang et al., 2015, 2021).

Bacterial growth assay

Bacterial growth was assessed both in vitro (rich medium and minimal medium) and in planta (tobacco leaves and tomato stems) as described previously (Zhang et al., 2017). Cell densities in tobacco leaves were represented in log10 CFU cm−2 and that in tomato stems were represented in log10 CFU g−1. Shikimic acid and L-Phe, L-Tyr, and L-Trp were purchased from Sango Biotech (Shanghai China) and were supplemented into minimal medium and tomato stem to restore the growth of the aroQ1/2 double mutant. For tomato stems supplementation, tomato cutting seedlings were soaked into one-quarter diluted minimal medium (Hoagland medium) with 200 μM of each L-Phe, L-Tyr, and L-Trp for about 4 days and then inoculated with the petiole-cutting inoculation method. Each assay was performed with three biological replicates including three replicates per trial for the growth assay in medium and four biological replicates including six plants per trial for the in planta growth assay. Mean values of all experiments were averaged with SD, and statistical significance was assessed using a post-hoc Dunnett's test following ANOVA.

β-galactosidase assay

Expression levels of lacZYA-fused target genes were evaluated with the β-galactosidase assay both in vitro and in planta as described previously (Zhang et al., 2013). Enzyme activities in vitro were expressed in Miller units (Miller, 1992) and that in planta was normalized with luminescence divided by cell number (Zhang et al., 2013). Each assay was performed with at least four biological replicates, including four replications per trial. Mean values of all experiments were averaged with SD, and statistical significance was assessed using a post-hoc Dunnett's test following ANOVA.

Virulence assay

Virulence assay was performed on wilt-susceptible tomato (Solanum lycopersicum cv. Moneymaker) and tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum CV. Bright Yellow) plants, which were grown at 25°C for about 3–4 weeks and subjected to the virulence test (Yao and Allen, 2007; Zhang et al., 2013). Tomato plants were inoculated by the petiole-cutting inoculation method that enables direct invasion into xylem vessels, and tobacco plants were inoculated by the leaf infiltration method that enables direct invasion into intercellular spaces of leaves. For growth restoration with shikimic acid, tomato cutting seedlings were soaked into one-quarter diluted minimal medium with 300 μM of shikimic acid for about 4 days and inoculated with the petiole-cutting inoculation method. Each assay was performed with at least four biological replicates including 12 plants per trial. Wilt symptoms of plants were inspected as a 1–4 disease index, and the mean values of all experiments were averaged. The virulence assay was also presented with survival curves, by which test plants were inspected daily with two levels of no symptoms (disease index below 3) and complete wilting (disease index equal to or higher than 3) as previously described (Poueymiro and Genin, 2009). The statistical significance was assessed using a post-hoc Dunnett's test following ANOVA.

Results

AroQ1 and AroQ2 control coordinately the biosynthesis of aromatic amino acids via the shikimate pathway in R. solanacearum

AroQ controls the third step of the shikimate pathway that catalyzes the formation of 3-dehydroquinate from 3-dehydroshikimate via a trans-dehydration reaction (Herrmann and Weaver, 1999; Sprenger, 2006; Maeda and Dudareva, 2012). We first generated aroQ mutants with the deletion of either aroQ1 or aroQ2 or both genes and assessed their growth profiles in a broth medium (nutrient-rich medium) and a minimal medium (Hoagland medium with 2% of sucrose). The growth of the aroQ1 mutant (RQ5920) was slightly delayed in both nutrient-rich and minimal media, with cell densities (OD600) slightly lower than those of the parent strain (RK5050) at the logarithmic phase, whereas the aroQ2 mutant (RQ5908) grew normally as parent strain RK5050 in both media (Figures 1A, B). RK5050 is a popA-lacZYA reporter strain from R. solanacearum OE1-1, which exhibits identical growth profiles and infection process as the wild-type strain OE1-1 toward different host plants (Yoshimochi et al., 2009b). The double mutant (RQ5951, with the deletion of both aroQ1 and aroQ2) grew slowly in the rich medium but failed to grow in the minimal medium (Figures 1A, B). The aroQ2 mutant grew normally as parent strain RK5050, indicating that existing 3-dehydroshikimate AroQ1 could fulfill the proliferation of R. solanacearum under nutrient-limited conditions. Single aroQ1 was thus selected for genetic complementation. Complementary aroQ1 fully restored the diminished growth of the double mutant (RQ5951) to that of RK5050 in the minimal medium (Figure 1B).

FIGURE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1. Involvement of AroQ in the growth of R. solanacearum OE1-1 in (A) nutrient-rich medium, (B) nutrient-limited medium (Hoagland medium with 2% of sucrose, minimal medium), (C) minimal medium with supplementary shikimic acid (SA) and (D) minimal medium with supplementary AAA of L-Phe, L-Tyr, and L-Trp. WT, RK5050 (OE1-1, popA-lacZYA); ΔaroQ1, RQ5920 (RK5050, ΔaroQ1); ΔaroQ2, RQ5908 (RK5050, ΔaroQ2); ΔaroQ1/2, RQ5951 (RK5050, ΔaroQ1/2, deletion of both aroQ1 and aroQ2); ΔaroQ1/2+C, and RQC1634 (RQ5951 with complementary aroQ1). For the growth assay in medium, cell suspension (washed two times with distilled water) was adjusted to an OD600 of 1.0 and inoculated into fresh media with a proportion of 1%, and OD600 was measured periodically. For supplementation with SA acid and AAA, SA, and AAA (L-Phe, L-Tyr, and L-Trp) were added into the minimal medium at moderate concentrations. Each assay was repeated with three biological replicates including three replicates per trial, and mean values of all experiments were averaged with standard deviation (error bars). Statistical significance between the double mutant (RQ5951) and RK5050 was assessed using a post-hoc Dunnett's test following the analysis of variance. Significance level ** indicates P < 0.01.

Shikimic acid (SA) is an important intermediate in the shikimate pathway. We assessed whether AroQ1 and AroQ2 control SA biosynthesis. Supplementary SA significantly restored the diminished growth of double mutant, OD600 of which was restored to about 0.6 at 36 h post inoculation (hpi) in the minimal medium with supplementary SA at a final concentration of 300 μM (Figure 1C). The shikimate pathway is a general route for AAA biosynthesis in many microorganisms. We further assessed whether AroQ1 and AroQ2 control AAA biosynthesis via the shikimate pathway. Supplementary AAA, including L-Phe, L-Tyr, and L-Trp at 200 μM each, greatly restored the diminished growth of the double mutant in the minimal medium (Figure 1D), indicating that R. solanacearum harbors duplicate 3-dehydroquinases of AroQ1 and AroQ2 to control the shikimate pathway and in turn the AAA biosynthesis.

Both AroQ1 and AroQ2 are important for the proliferation of R. solanacearum inside host plants

Colonization inside host plants, especially extensive proliferation in xylem vessels, is essential for the pathogenicity of R. solanacearum (Genin, 2010). Nutrient inside plants is believed to be relatively limited compared with that in rich medium, but relatively more abundant than that in the minimal sucrose medium (Zuluaga et al., 2013; Lowe-Power et al., 2018). We further assessed the proliferation of the aroQ1 mutant, aroQ2 mutant, and the double mutant in intercellular spaces of tobacco leaves and tomato xylem vessels. For the growth assay in tobacco leaves, a bacterial suspension at a cell density of 104 CFU ml−1 was infiltrated into intercellular spaces of tobacco leaves with a needle-less syringe, and leaf disks were punched for the quantification of cell densities with the dilution plating technique (Zhang et al., 2015). The aroQ1 mutant and aroQ2 mutant exhibited similar growth as a parent strain (RK5050) in tobacco leaves, which started at ~102 CFU cm−2 on the 1st day (about 6 h after infiltration), drastically reached a maximum of ~109-1010 CFU cm−2 at 4 days post infiltration (dpi), and then decreased quickly to ~106 CFU cm−2 at 6 dpi (Figure 2A). At this point, infiltrated tobacco leaves became withered and dried. The proliferation of double mutant (RQ5951) in tobacco leaves was substantially impaired, which reached the maximum of ~106 CFU cm−2 at 4 dpi, but remained at this density till 10 dpi (Figure 2A). At this time point, RQ5951-infiltrated tobacco leaves were healthy, and no wilting symptoms were observed on these leaves.

FIGURE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 2. Involvement of AroQ on the growth of R. solanacearum OE1-1 in (A) tobacco leaves (intercellular spaces) and (B) tomato stems (xylem vessels). WT, RK5050 (OE1-1, popA-lacZYA); ΔaroQ1, RQ5920 (RK5050, ΔaroQ1); ΔaroQ2, RQ5908 (RK5050, ΔaroQ2); ΔaroQ1/2, and RQ5951 (RK5050, ΔaroQ1/2); +SA, with supplementary shikimic acid (SA). For growth in tobacco leaves, which was presented in log CFU cm−2, cell suspension of 0.1 OD600 was infiltrated into tobacco leaves, and leaf disks (0.38 cm2) were punched for the quantification of cell number by the dilution plating. For the growth assay in tomato stems, which was presented in log CFU g−1, tomato plants were inoculated with the petiole-cutting inoculation method, and stem species were cut and weighted for the quantification of cell number by dilution plating. For SA supplementation, shikimic acid was added into a one-quarter diluted minimal medium at 300 Mm, tomato cutting seedlings were soaked for 4 days, and then were inoculated with the petiole-cutting inoculation method. Each assay was repeated with three biological replicates including three replicates per trial for the in vitro growth assay, and more than four biological replicates with six plants per trial for the in planta growth assay. Mean values from all experiments were averaged and presented with SD, and statistical significance between the double mutant and RK5050 was assessed using a post-hoc Dunnett's test following ANOVA. Significance level, ** indicates P < 0.01.

For the growth assay in tomato stems, tomato plants were inoculated by the petiole-cutting inoculation method, by which 2 μl of a bacterial suspension at 0.1 OD600 (108 CFU ml−1) was dropped onto the fresh-cut surface of petioles, and stem pieces were excised for the quantification of cells densities using the dilution plating technique (Zhang et al., 2015). The deletion of either aroQ1 or aroQ2 did not alter the proliferation of R. solanacearum in tomato stems, which proliferated drastically to the maximum of ~109-1010 CFU g−1 at about 4 dpi and decreased quickly to ~105-106 CFU g−1 at 6 dpi (Figure 2B). At this point, RK5050-inoculated plants became collapsed and died. The proliferation of the double mutant (RQ5951) was substantially impaired, which reached to a maximum of about 106 CFU g−1 at 4 dpi, but remained at this density till 10 dpi (Figure 2B). At this point, no wilting symptoms were observed on test tomato plants inoculated with the double mutant. Supplementary SA significantly restored the diminished growth of aroQ1/2 double mutant in the minimal medium. We assessed whether supplementary SA could restore the impaired growth of the double mutant in tomato stems. Tomato cutting seedlings were soaked in one-quarter diluted Hoagland minimal medium with SA (300 μM) for 3 days, which enables tomato plants to accumulate more SA inside stems, and inoculated using the petiole-cutting inoculation method. Supplementary SA did not alter the proliferation of the parent strain (RK5050) in stems of tomato cutting seedlings, but greatly enhanced the growth of double mutant, which was about two orders of magnitude higher than that of the control without SA supplementation, but was about one to two orders of magnitude less than that of RK5050 in tomato stems at 2–4 dpi (Figure 2B). All of these results indicated that both AroQ1 and AroQ2 are important for the proliferation of R. solanacearum inside host plants, and the impaired proliferation of the aroQ1/Q2 double mutant is partially due to insufficient SA inside host plants.

AroQ1 and AroQ2 are required for the T3SS expression both in vitro and in planta

We previously demonstrated that R. solanacearum DAHP synthase AroG controls the shikimate pathway and affects T3SS expression via the PrhA signaling cascade (Zhang W. et al., 2019). We here evaluated whether AroQ1 and AroQ2 affected T3SS expression. The expression of the T3SS genes was monitored with a popA-lacZYA fusion, which is located on the left side of the hrp regulon and exhibits similar expression profiles as the T3SS genes (Yoshimochi et al., 2009a). Expression of the T3SS was repressed in the rich medium, but induced in the hrp-inducing minimal medium or getting in contact with host signals (Valls et al., 2006; Yoshimochi et al., 2009a). The double mutant failed to grow in the hrp-inducing minimal medium, and SA (300 μM) was added into the hrp-inducing minimal medium to support its growth. Supplementary SA did not alter the popA expression in the parent strain RK5050. The popA expression in the double mutant (RQ5951) was substantially decreased even in SA-supplemented hrp-inducing minimal medium, which was approximately one-third of that in the parent strain RK5050 (Figure 3A). Complementary aroQ1 fully restored impaired popA expression of the double mutant compared to that of RK5050 (Figure 3A). On the contrary, aroQ1 mutant and aroQ2 mutant exhibited an identical popA expression to RK5050 (Figure 3A).

FIGURE 3
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 3. Involvement of AroQ on T3SS expression (popA-lacZYA, a representative T3SS gene). (A) Expression of popA-lacZYA in SA-supplemented hrp-inducing minimal medium; (B) expression of popA-lacZYA in tobacco leaves. WT, RK5050 (OE1-1, popA-lacZYA); ΔaroQ1, RQ5920 (RK5050, ΔaroQ1); ΔaroQ2, RQ5908 (RK5050, ΔaroQ2); ΔaroQ1/2, RQ5951 (RK5050, ΔaroQ1/2); ΔaroQ1/2+C, and RQC1634 (RQ5951 with complementary aroQ1). +SA, supplementary shikimic acid (SA) in tobacco leaves. For the in vitro enzyme assay, strains were grown in the hrp-inducing minimal medium with supplementary SA at 300 μM to an OD600 of 0.1 and subjected to enzymatic measurement, enzymatic activities of which were presented in Miller units. Each assay was repeated with three biological replicates, including three replicates per trial. For the in planta enzyme assay, tobacco leaves were infiltrated with a bacterial suspension of 0.1 OD600 or with supplementary SA at 300 μM. Leaf disks were punched for enzymatic measurement with the Galacto-Light Plus kit, the enzymatic activities of which were presented with luminescence normalized by cell number (RLU cell−1). The in planta enzyme assay was carried out to ~12 h post-infiltration (hpi). At this point, infiltrated regions of tobacco leaves with bacterial cells became clear scald. Luminescence was determined using the GloMax20 Luminometer (Promega), and cell numbers in punched leaf disks were quantified by dilution plating. Each assay was carried out with more than four biological replicates including six replications per trial. Mean values of all experiments were averaged with SD, and statistical significance between mutants and RK55050 was assessed using a post-hoc Dunnett's test following ANOVA. Significance level, ** indicates P < 0.01.

The T3SS expression can be enhanced to much higher levels in host plants by coming in contact with host signals (Valls et al., 2006), and we further assessed whether AroQ1 and AroQ2 are required for the in planta T3SS expression. The in planta enzyme assay was carried out in tobacco leaves, and the enzymatic activities of which were presented with RLU cell −1 (luminescence normalized by cell number). A bacterial suspension at 0.1 OD600 (108 CFU ml−1) was infiltrated into tobacco leaves, and bacterial cells in leaf disks were recovered and subjected to the enzyme assay 6–12 h post-inoculation (hpi). Consistent with the above results from the in vitro enzyme assay, the popA expression in tobacco leaves was not altered with the deletion of either aroQ1 or aroQ2 but diminished in the aroQ1/2 double mutant, which was < 10% compared to that in RK5050 at 6–12 hpi (Figure 3B). In consideration of the fact that aroQ1/2 double mutant grew faintly inside host plants and supplementary SA greatly restored its impaired growth in host plants. We assessed whether supplementary SA could restore impaired popA expression of the double mutant in tobacco leaves. Bacterial cells were suspended in SA solution (300 μM) at 0.1 OD600 and were infiltrated into tobacco leaves for the in planta enzyme assay. Supplementary SA slightly enhanced popA expression of the parent strain (RK5050) in tobacco leaves, but no restoration in the double mutant at 6–12 hpi (Figure 3B). All of these results indicated that AroQ1 and AroQ2 are required for the T3SS expression both in vitro and in planta, and their involvement on the T3SS is independent of growth deficiency under nutrient-limited conditions.

Involvement of AroQ1 and AroQ2 on the T3SS expression was mediated through the PrhA signaling cascade to HrpG and HrpB

The T3SS expression in R. solanacearum is directly controlled by a key regulator HrpB, the expression of which is repressed in the rich medium, but activated in the hrp-inducing medium (Valls et al., 2006). We deleted aroQ1 and aroQ2 from a hrpB-lacZYA reporter strain RK5046 to assess the involvement of AroQ on the hrpB expression. Consistent with that on popA expression, the deletion of either aroQ1 or aroQ2 did not alter the hrpB expression in the SA-supplemented hrp-inducing minimal medium, while the deletion of both aroQ1 and aroQ2 substantially decreased the hrpB expression (Figure 3A). Complementary aroQ1 fully restored impaired hrpB expression of the double mutant compared to that of the parent strain RK5046, confirming that the impact of AroQ1 and AroQ2 on the T3SS is mediated through the key regulator HrpB.

The hrpB expression is positively regulated by two close paralogs of HrpG and PrhG in parallel ways (Plener et al., 2010; Zhang et al., 2013). The deletion of aroQ1 and aroQ2 substantially impaired hrpG expression in the SA-supplemented hrp-inducing minimal medium and the rich medium, but no alteration on prhG expression (Figures 4A, B). The hrpG expression is regulated by a signaling cascade of PrhA-PrhIR-PrhJ. We further generated double mutants from reporter strains of RK5134 (prhA-lacZYA), RK5130 (prhIR-lacZYA), and RK5124 (prhJ-lacZYA) to assess its impact on these T3SS regulating regulators. Expression of these genes was substantially decreased in aroQ1/2 double mutants in the rich medium and the SA-supplemented hrp-inducing minimal medium (Figures 4A, B). The prhG expression was positively regulated by PrhN and PhcA, respectively, while no alteration in the expression of these genes with the deletion of both aroQ1 and aroQ2 (Figures 4A, B). All of these results confirmed that the involvement of AroQ1 and AroQ2 on the T3SS expression is mediated through the PrhA signaling cascade to HrpG and HrpB.

FIGURE 4
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 4. Involvement of AroQ in the expression of T3SS-regulated genes in (A) nutrient-rich broth medium and (B) in the hrp-inducing minimal medium with supplementary SA at 300 μM. WT refers to reporter strains of RK5046 (hrpB-lacZAY), RK5120 (hrpG-lacZAY), RK5212 (prhG-lacZAY), RK5619 (prhN-lacZAY), RQ6144 (prhIR-laczYA), RQ6074 (prhJ-lacZYA), and RK5134 (prhA-lacZAY). ΔaroQ/12 refers to the deletion of both aroQ1 and aroQ2 from each reporter strain. The hrpB expression was presented only in (B) hrp-inducing minimal medium since the expression of hrpB and the T3SS genes is not activated in a nutrient-rich broth medium. Enzymatic activities were assessed with the in vitro enzyme assay and presented in Miller units. Each assay was repeated with three biological replicates including three replicates per trial. Mean values of all experiments were averaged with SD and presented with relative expression compared with their parent reporter strains. Statistical significance between parent strains and the double mutant was assessed using a post-hoc Dunnett's test following ANOVA. Significance level, ** indicates P < 0.01.

AroQ1 and AroQ2 were essential for the pathogenicity of R. solanacearum

The T3SS and in planta proliferation are essential for the pathogenicity of R. solanacearum to wilt host plants (Genin, 2010). We assessed whether AroQ1 and AroG2 contributed to the pathogenicity of R. solanacearum toward different host plants. The virulence assay was performed on host tomato and tobacco plants with the petiole-cutting inoculation method and leaf infiltration methods, respectively, which enable direct invasion into host plants. The aroQ1 and aroQ2 mutants exhibited similar virulence as the wild-type strain RK5050 on two host plants, while the aroQ1/2 double mutant failed to cause any wilting symptoms on two plants till 24 dpi (Figures 5A, B). Complementary aroQ1 fully restored the diminished pathogenicity of the aroQ1/2 double mutant compared to that of the wild-type strain (Figures 5C, D), confirming that AroQ1 and AroQ2 are essential for R. solanacearum to wilt host plants.

FIGURE 5
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 5. Virulence of aroQ mutants on (A, B) tomato plants with the petiole-cutting inoculation method (C, D), tobacco plants with the leaf infiltration method. WT, RK5050 (OE1-1, popA-lacZYA); ΔaroQ1, RQ5920 (RK5050, ΔaroQ1); ΔaroQ2, RQ5908 (RK5050, ΔaroQ2); ΔaroQ1/2, RQ5951 (RK5050, ΔaroQ1/2); ΔaroQ1/2+C, and RQC1634 (RQ5951 with complementary aroQ1). (A, C) Refer to virulence assay with the disease index. (B, D) Refer to surviving curves corresponding to the virulence test with the disease index of (A, B), respectively. For the petiole-cutting inoculation, 2 μl of a bacterial suspension at 108 CFU ml−1 was dropped onto the freshly cut surface of tomato petioles. For the leaf infiltration, about 50 μl of the bacterial suspension of 108 CFU ml−1 was infiltrated into the tobacco leaves with a blunt-end syringe. For the disease index, wilt symptoms on test plants were scored on a disease index scale from 0 to 4 (0, no wilting; 1, 1–25% wilting; 2, 26–50% wilting; 3, 51–75% wilting; 4, 76–100% wilted and dead). Surviving curves were recorded with two levels of no wilting symptoms (disease index below 3) and completely wilted (disease index equal to or higher than 3) as previously described. Mean values of all experiments were averaged with SD, while it was not presented in figures due to the consideration of esthetic appearance. Statistical significance was assessed using a post-hoc Dunnett's test following ANOVA.

Supplementary SA substantially restored the proliferation of the aroQ1/2 double mutant inside tomato stems (Figure 2B). We thus assessed whether the diminished pathogenicity of the aroQ1/2 double mutant was due to insufficient SA in tomato plants. Tomato cuttings were soaked in one-quarter diluted Hoagland medium with SA (300 μM) for 4 days and subjected to inoculation by the petiole-cutting inoculation method. Supplementary SA did not alter the infection process of the parent strain RK5050 on tomato cuttings (Figures 6A, B). RK5050 wilted tomato cuttings by about 7 dpi and eventually killed all test tomato cuttings by about 14 dpi even without SA supplementation, which was identical to that of RK5050 on tomato cuttings with SA supplementation (Figures 6A, B). Without SA supplementation, the aroQ1/2 double mutant failed to cause any wilting symptoms on tomato cuttings till 21 dpi, while the double mutant began to wilt about 20% of SA-supplemented tomato cuttings at 21 dpi (Figures 6A, B), indicating that the contribution of AroQ1 and AroQ2 to pathogenicity was partially due to insufficient SA inside host plants.

FIGURE 6
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 6. Restoration of SA on the virulence of the aroQ1/Q2 double mutant on tomato cutting seedlings with petiole-cutting inoculation method. (A) Virulence assay with the disease index and (B) surviving curves. WT, RK5050 (OE1-1, popA-lacZYA); ΔaroQ1/2, RQ5951 (RK5050, ΔaroQ1/2); +SA, SA supplementation. For SA restoration, tomato cutting seedlings were soaked in one-quarter diluted minimal medium with SA at 300 μM for 4 days and subsequently inoculated with the petiole-cutting inoculation method. The disease index was scored on scales from 0 to 4, and surviving curves were performed with two levels of no wilting symptoms (disease index below 3) and completely wilted (disease index equal to or higher than 3). Mean values of all experiments were averaged with SD, while it was not presented in figures due to the consideration of esthetic appearance. Statistical significance was assessed using a post-hoc Dunnett's test following ANOVA.

Discussion

In the present study, we provided genetic evidence to demonstrate that two putative 3-dehydroquinases, AroQ1 and AroQ2, are cooperatively essential for AAA biosynthesis via the shikimate pathway in R. solanacearum. Moreover, they display additional roles in promoting the T3SS expression apart from AAA biosynthesis, and their impact on the T3SS was mediated through the well-characterized PrhA signaling cascade. The shikimate pathway is a common route for AAA biosynthesis in many microorganisms, comprising seven steps, which begins with DAHP formation and ends with chorismate formation (Sprenger, 2006; Maeda and Dudareva, 2012). DAHP synthase AroG controls the first step in the shikimate pathway, and 3-dehydroquinases control the third step in R. solanacearum. We previously reported that DAHP synthase AroG1 controls the shikimate pathway and was required for the T3SS expression in R. solanacearum. The impact of AroG on the T3SS expression was mediated through the PrhA signaling cascade (Zhang W. et al., 2019). In the shikimate pathway, AroG controls the first step and AroQ controls the third step, respectively, while both of them are required for the T3SS expression via the same PrhA signaling cascade, indicating that enzymes involved in the shikimate pathway might display dual roles in the tryptophan biosynthesis and promoting the T3SS expression in R. solanacearum. With genome searching on R. solanacearum GMI1000 (a well-studied strain), a subset of enzymes was annotated to be involved in the shikimate pathway, i.e., putative 3-dehydroquinate synthase AroB (RSc2969) controls the second reaction for the formation of 3-dehydroquinate, two shikimate dehydrogenases, AroE1 (RSc2777) and AroE2 (RSp1398), control the forth reaction for the formation of shikimic acid (SA). SA is an important intermediate in the shikimate pathway. Furthermore, shikimate kinase AroK (RSc2970), 1-carboxyvinyltransferase AroA (RSc0907), and chorismate synthase AroC (RSc1566) control the rest three reactions to form chorismic acid, the final product in the shikimate pathway. Further experiments will be performed to confirm whether other enzymes involved in the shikimate pathway display dual roles in the T3SS expression in R. solanacearum. Chorismic acid is an unstable branch point intermediate that serves as a precursor leading to all three aromatic amino acids, i.e., anthranilate synthase TrpEG controls the transformation of chorismic acid into anthranilic acid, and finally to tryptophan biosynthesis. We currently demonstrated that TrpE displays dual roles in tryptophan biosynthesis, promoting the T3SS expression in R. solanacearum. Different from the shikimate pathway, the impact of TrpE on the T3SS was mediated through parallel pathways of PrhJ-HrpG and PrhG to HrpB (under submission). Moreover, tryptophan plays a role as a novel inducer of the T3SS expression (under submission), while SA and chorismic acid did not alter the T3SS expression (Zhang W. et al., 2019). The aroQ1/2 double mutant was auxotrophic that failed to grow in nutrient-limited sucrose medium, and supplementary SA could support growth in sucrose medium, while the T3SS expression was substantially impaired with the deletion of both aroQ1 and aroQ2 even under SA-supplemented condition, indicating that the impact of AroQ on the T3SS was independent of growth deficiency under nutrient-limited conditions. This phenomenon was also found in some auxotrophic mutants, such as cysB mutant (cysteine auxotroph), proA mutant (proline auxotroph), and trpE mutant (tryptophan auxotroph), which exhibited substantially impaired T3SS expression, but was independent of growth deficiency under nutrient-limited conditions (Chen et al., 2022; Guan et al., 2022). All these suggested that intermediates involved in the shikimate pathway and downstream pathway for AAA biosynthesis might display different functional roles on the T3SS expression. Enzymes involved in the shikimate pathway and the downstream pathway for AAA biosynthesis are required for the T3SS expression, while the impact of these factors on the T3SS expression is mediated through different pathways. Moreover, a PadR-like regulator PrhP displays important roles in the detoxification of ferulic acid and salicylic acid to protect them from the toxicity of phenolic acids, while PrhP positively regulates the T3SS expression mediated through novel pathways to HrpB, which is independent of HrpG and PrhG in R. solanacearum (Zhang Y. et al., 2019). All these results confirmed that R. solanacearum integrates a complex network to globally regulate the T3SS at different conditions (Genin, 2010; Hikichi et al., 2017). Further experiments are needed to elucidate the global regulation of the T3SS in R. solanacearum.

All taken together, these results demonstrated that R. solanacearum AroQ displays additional roles in promoting the T3SS expression apart from AAA biosynthesis. It provides novel insight into the understanding of the biological function of AroQ for AAA biosynthesis via the shikimate pathway and its involvement in the T3SS expression in R. solanacearum.

Data availability statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Author contributions

TG and YW conceived and designed the experiments. QZ, BW, LH, and DY performed the experiments. DY, TL, and TG discussed results. YW wrote the manuscript. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Funding

This study was supported by Chongqing Bureau of Science and Technology CSTB2022TIAD-GPX0011.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher's note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2023.1186688/full#supplementary-material

References

Arlat, M., Gough, C. L., Zischek, C., Barberis, P. A., Trigalet, A., and Boucher, C. (1992). Transcriptional organization and expression of the large hrp gene cluster of Pseudomonas solanacearum. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 5, 187–193. doi: 10.1094/MPMI-5-187

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bentley, R. (1990). The shikimate pathway: a metabolic tree with many branches. Crit. Rev. Biochem. Mol. Biol. 25, 307–384. doi: 10.3109/10409239009090615

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Caldwell, D., Kim, B. S., and Lyer-Pascuzzi, A. S. (2017). Ralstonia solanacearum differentially colonizes roots of resistant and susceptible tomato plants. Phytopathology 107, 528–536. doi: 10.1094/PHYTO-09-16-0353-R

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Chen, M., Zhang, W., Han, L., Ru, X., Cao, Y., Hikichi, Y., et al. (2022). A CysB regulator positively regulates cysteine synthesis, expression of type III secretion system genes, and pathogenicity in Ralstonia solanacearum. Mol. Plant Pathol. 23, 679–692. doi: 10.1111/mpp.13189

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Choi, K. H., Gaynor, J. B., White, K. G., Lopez, C., Bosio, C. M., Karkhoffff-Chweizer, R. R., et al. (2005). A Tn7-based broad range bacterial cloning and expression system. Nat. Methods. 2, 443–448. doi: 10.1038/nmeth765

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Coll, N. S., and Valls, M. (2013). Current knowledge on the Ralstonia solanacearum type III secretion system. Microb. Biotechnol. 6, 614–620. doi: 10.1111/1751-7915.12056

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Cunnac, S., Occhialini, A., Barberis, P., Boucher, C., and Genin, S. (2004). Inventory and functional analysis of the large Hrp regulon in Ralstonia solanacearum: identification of novel effector proteins translocated to plant host cells through the type III secretion system. Mol. Microbiol. 53, 115–128. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2004.04118.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Deng, W., Marshall, N. C., Rowland, J. L., McCoy, J. M., Worrall, L. J., Santos, A. S., et al. (2017). Assembly, structure, function and regulation of type III secretion systems. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 15, 323–337. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro.2017.20

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Dosselaere, F., and Vanderleyden, J. (2001). A metabolic node in action:chorismate-utilizing enzymes in microorganisms. Crit. Rev. Microbiol. 27, 75–131. doi: 10.1080/20014091096710

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Fegan, M., and Prior, P. (2005). “How complex is the ‘Ralstonia solanacearum species complex',” in Bacterial Wilt Disease and the Ralstonia solanacearum Species Complex, eds C. Allen, A. C. Hayward, and P. Prior ( St Paul, MN: American Phytopathological Society), 449–461.

Google Scholar

Genin, S. (2010). Molecular traits controlling host range and adaptation to plants in Ralstonia solanacearum. New Phytol. 187, 920–928. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2010.03397.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Genin, S., Brito, B., Denny, T. P., and Boucher, C. (2005). Control of the Ralstonia solanacearum Type III secretion system (Hrp) genes by the global virulence regulator PhcA. FEBS Lett. 579, 2077–2081. doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2005.02.058

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Genin, S., and Denny, T. P. (2012). Pathogenomics of the Ralstonia solanacearum species complex. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 50, 67–89. doi: 10.1146/annurev-phyto-081211-173000

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Gosset, G., Bonner, C. A., and Jensen, R. A. (2001). Microbial origin ofplant-type 2-keto-3-deoxy-D-arabino-heptulosonate 7-phosphatesynthases, exemplified by the chorismate- and tryptophan-regulatedenzyme from Xanthomonas campestris. J. Bacteriol. 183, 4061–4070. doi: 10.1128/JB.183.13.4061-4070.2001

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Guan, Y., Wang, R., Chen, N., Zhu, Y., Han, L., Chen, X., et al. (2022). Functional characterization of a gamma-glutamyl phosphate reductase ProA in proline biosynthesis and promoting expression of type three secretion system in Ralstonia solanacearum. Front Microbiol. 29:945831. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.945831

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Herrmann, K. M. (1983). “The common aromatic biosynthetic pathway,” in Amino Acids: Biosynthsis and Genetic Regulation, eds K. M. Herrmann and R. L. Somervillle (Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley), 301–322.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

Herrmann, K. M., and Weaver, L. M. (1999). The shikimate pathway. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 50, 473–503. doi: 10.1146/annurev.arplant.50.1.473

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hikichi, Y., Mori, Y., Ishikawa, S., Hayashi, K., Ohnishi, K., Kiba, A., et al. (2017). Regulation involved in colonization of intercellular spaces of host plants in Ralstonia solanacearum. Front Plant Sci. 8, 967. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.00967

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Jiang, G., Wei, Z., Xu, J., Chen, H., Zhang, Y., and She, X. (2017). Bacterial wilt in china: History, current status, and future perspectives. Front. Plant Sci. 8, 1549. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.01549

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kanda, A., Ohnishi, S., Tomiyama, H., Hasegawa, H., Yasukohchi, M., Kiba, A., et al. (2003). Type III secretion machinery-defificient mutants of Ralstonia solanacearum lose their ability to colonize resulting in loss of pathogenicity. J. General Plant Pathol. 69, 250–257. doi: 10.1007/s10327-003-0041-3

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Landry, D., González-Fuente, M., Deslandes, L., and Peeters, N. (2020). The large, diverse, and robust arsenal of Ralstonia solanacearum type III effectors and their in planta functions. Mol. Plant Pathol. 21, 1377–1388. doi: 10.1111/mpp.12977

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lei, N., Chen, L., Kiba, A., Hikichi, Y., Zhang, Y., and Ohnishi, K. (2020). Super-multiple deletion analysis of type III effectors in Ralstonia solanacearum OE1-1 for full virulence toward host plants. Front. Microbiol. 30, 1683. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.01683

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lowe-Power, T. M., Khokhani, D., and Allen, C. (2018). How Ralstonia solanacearum exploits and thrives in the flowing plant xylem environment. Trends Microbiol. 26, 929–942. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2018.06.002

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Maeda, H., and Dudareva, N. (2012). The shikimate pathway and aromatic amino acid biosynthesis in plants. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 63, 73–105. doi: 10.1146/annurev-arplant-042811-105439

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Mansfield, J., Genin, S., Magori, S., Citovsky, V., Sriariyanum, M., Ronald, P., et al. (2012). Top 10 plant pathogenic bacteria in molecular plant pathology. Mol. Plant Pathol. 13, 614–629. doi: 10.1111/j.1364-3703.2012.00804.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

McGarvey, J. A., Denny, T. P., and Schell, M. A. (1999). Spatial-temporal and quantitative analysis of growth and EPS I production by Ralstonia solanacearum in resistant and susceptible tomato cultivars. Phytopathology 89, 1233–1239. doi: 10.1094/PHYTO.1999.89.12.1233

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Miller, J. H. (1992). “The lac system,” in A Short Course in Bacterial Genetics. A Laboratory Manual and Handbook for Escherichia coli and Related Bacteria, ed J. H. Miller (Plainview: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press), 43–80.

Google Scholar

Mukaihara, T., Tamura, N., and Iwabuchi, M. (2010). Genome-wide identification of a large repertoire of Ralstonia solanacearum type III effector proteins by a new functional screen. Mol. Plant-Microbe. Interact. 23, 251–262. doi: 10.1094/MPMI-23-3-0251

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ogino, T., Garner, C., Markley, J. L., and Herrmann, K. M. (1982). Biosynthesis of aromatic compounds: 13C NMR spectroscopy of whole Escherichia coli cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 79, 5828–5832. doi: 10.1073/pnas.79.19.5828

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Pedro-Jove, D. R., Puigvert, M., Sebasti, P., Macho, A. P., Monteiro, J. S., Coll, N. S., et al. (2021). Dynamic expression of Ralstonia solanacearum virulence factors and metabolism-controlling genes during plant infection. BMC Genom. 22, 170. doi: 10.1186/s12864-021-07457-w

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Plener, L., Manfredi, P., Valls, M., and Genin, S. (2010). PrhG, a transcriptional regulator responding to growth conditions, is involved in the control of the type III secretion system regulon in Ralstonia solanacearum. J. Bacteriol. 192, 1011–1019. doi: 10.1128/JB.01189-09

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Poueymiro, M., and Genin, S. (2009). Secreted proteins from Ralstonia solanacearum: a hundred tricks to kill a plant. Curr Opin Microbiol, 12, 44–52.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

Roberts, D. P., Denny, T. P., and Schell, M. A. (1988). Cloning of the egl gene of Pseudomonas solanacearum and analysis of its role in phytopathogenicity. J. Bacteriol. 170, 1445–1451. doi: 10.1128/jb.170.4.1445-1451.1988

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Simon, R., Priefer, U., and Pühler, A. (1983). A broad host range mobilization system for in vivo genetic engineering: transpo son mutagenesis in gram negative bacteria. Nat Biotechnol. 1:784–791.

Google Scholar

Sprenger, G. A. (2006). Aromatic Amino Acids. Amino Acid Biosynthesis~Pathways, Regulation and Metabolic Engineering. Berlin: Springer.

Google Scholar

Valls, M., Genin, S., and Boucher, C. (2006). Integrated regulation of the type III secretion system and other virulence determinants in Ralstonia solanacearum. PLoS Pathog. 2, e82. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.0020082

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yao, J., and Allen, C. (2007). The plant pathogen Ralstonia solanacearum needs aerotaxis for normal biofilm formation and interactions with its tomato host. J. Bacteriol. 189, 6415–6424. doi: 10.1128/JB.00398-07

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yoshimochi, T., Hikichi, Y., Kiba, A., and Ohnishi, K. (2009a). The global virulence regulator PhcA negatively controls the Ralstonia solanacearum hrp regulatory cascade by repressing expression of the PrhIR signaling proteins. J. Bacteriol. 191, 3424–3428. doi: 10.1128/JB.01113-08

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yoshimochi, T., Zhang, Y., Kiba, A., Hikichi, Y., and Ohnishi, K. (2009b). Expression of hrpG and activation of response regulator HrpG are controlled by distinct signal cascades in Ralstonia solanacearum. J. Gen. Plant Pathol. 75,196–204. doi: 10.1007/s10327-009-0157-1

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhang, W., Li, J., Shi, X., Hikichi, Y., Zhang, Y., and Ohnishi, K. (2019). Functional characterization of two putative DAHP synthases of AroG1 and AroG2 and their links with type III secretion system in Ralstonia solanacearum. Front. Microbiol. 10, 183. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.00183

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhang, W. Q., Li, J. M., Tang, Y., Shi, X., Ohnishi, K., and Zhang, Y. (2017). Involvement of NpdA, a putative 2-nitropropane dioxygenase, in the T3SS expression and full virulence in Ralstonia solanacearum OE1-1. Front. Microbiol. 8, 1990. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.01990

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhang, Y., Chao, Y., Zhang, L., Hikichi, Y., Ohnishi, K., and Li, J. (2021). The Tn7-based genomic integration is dependent on an attTn7 box in the glms gene and is site-specifific with monocopy in Ralstonia solanacearum species complex. Mol. Plant Microbe. Interact. 34, 720–725. doi: 10.1094/MPMI-11-20-0325-SC

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhang, Y., Chen, L., Takehi, Y., Kiba, A., Hikichi, Y., and Ohnishi, K. (2013). Functional analysis of Ralstonia solanacearum PrhG regulating the hrp regulon in host plants. Microbiol. SGM 159, 1695–1704. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.067819-0

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhang, Y., Luo, F., Wu, D., Hikichi, Y., Kiba, A., Igarashi, Y., et al. (2015). PrhN, a putative MarR family transcriptional regulator, is involved in positive regulation of type III secretion system and full virulence of Ralstonia solanacearum. Front. Microbiol. 6, 357. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2015.00357

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhang, Y., Zhang, W. Q., Han, L., Li, J., Shi, X. J., Hikichi, Y., et al. (2019). Involvement of a PadR regulator PrhP on virulence of Ralstonia solanacearum by controlling detoxification of phenolic acids and type III secretion system. Mol. Plant Pathol. 20, 1477–1490. doi: 10.1111/mpp.12854

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zuluaga, A. P., Puigvert, M., and Valls, M. (2013). Novel plant inputs influencing Ralstonia solanacearum during infection. Front. Microbiol. 4, 349. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2013.00349

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: Ralstonia solanacearum, type three secretion system (T3SS), pathogenesis, global regulation network, biosynthesis of aromatic amino acids

Citation: Zhang Q, Wu B, Han L, Yu D, Liang T, Wang Y and Guo T (2023) Functional characterization of two 3-dehydroquinases of AroQ1 and AroQ2 in the shikimate pathway and expression of genes for the type III secretion system in Ralstonia solanacearum. Front. Microbiol. 14:1186688. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1186688

Received: 15 March 2023; Accepted: 28 March 2023;
Published: 26 April 2023.

Edited by:

Peng Li, Hainan Normal University, China

Reviewed by:

Xiaofan Zhou, South China Agricultural University, China
Huasong Zou, Huzhou College, China

Copyright © 2023 Zhang, Wu, Han, Yu, Liang, Wang and Guo. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Yan Wang, x_wangyan@163.com

These authors have contributed equally to this work

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.