Abstract
Fluid-rock interactions in hydrothermal systems are capable of liberating ammonium (NH4+) from sedimentary organic material and making it bioavailable for benthic and pelagic microbial communities. Hydrothermal systems in organic-rich sedimentary basins are therefore thought to have played a key role in supplying bioavailable nitrogen to the early biosphere. To place new quantitative bounds on this process, we examined sediments from active hydrothermal systems in the Guaymas Basin, a young oceanic spreading center in the Gulf of California. We analysed four shallow sediment cores that were taken in the Guaymas Basin’s hydrothermally-active Southern Trough. We used a combination of isotopic tracers (δ15N, δ13C) and elemental abundances to explore nitrogen and metal mobility in buried sediments. We found that ca. 54% of the organically-bound nitrogen is remobilized by active seepage in the top 10 cm of the sediment package within as little as 27–83 yr. Extrapolating these findings over the hydrothermally-active area of the basin yields an ammonium seepage flux of ca. 1.3–4.1 mol/s. In addition, high temperature venting liberates ca. 156–187 mol/s, as estimated from previous data. Assuming biological uptake of hydrothermally recycled ammonium in the water column, these fluxes could support up to 1.3% and 58% of export productivity, respectively. Our data also reveal that the accumulation of micronutrients or potentially toxic metals is influenced by the presence of organic material in seep sediments. The Guaymas case study demonstrates that hydrothermal seepage in sedimentary basins can create a significant nutrient flux and is an efficient means of recycling nutrients from organic matter at shallow burial depths. Hydrothermal nutrient fluxes could therefore have enhanced microbial activity in Earth’s history, in particular during time intervals when Earth’s oceans are thought to have been nutrient-depleted. Our data also highlight the role of organic material in enhancing metal mobilization and accumulation in otherwise metal-starved hydrothermal seeps.
1 Introduction
Hydrothermal systems are sites of pronounced thermochemical disequilibrium that play a significant role in nutrient supply to modern oceans (). In particular, hydrothermal plumes are rich in metals that are vital for life (e.g., Fe, Co, Ni) and contribute to driving basin-scale biological productivity today (e.g., ). On the early Earth, hydrothermal vents may have played an even more significant role in sustaining life, before oxidative weathering started to supply bioessential metals to the oceans (). In addition, hydrothermal fluids circulating through sediment packages may have provided a mechanism of remobilizing organic-bound nutrients such as ammonium (). In the anoxic oceans of the early Earth, remineralization of biomass in the water column was likely suppressed (), and so hydrothermal circulation may have partly filled this niche of nutrient recycling (, ; ,).
While fossilized hydrothermal systems are a key focus for early life research, they prohibit quantitative estimates of recycling efficiency and nutrient fluxes because the timescales over which nutrient mobilization occurred are unconstrained. In this study, we focus on a modern analog, namely the Guaymas Basin in the Gulf of California, Mexico, where the interplay between active submarine magmatic-hydrothermal processes and large, organic-rich sedimentary systems can be examined.
The Gulf of California (Figure 1) is an active continental rift system that initiated ca. 12–15 million years ago (Ma; ), with long transfer faults separating a series of relatively narrow rift segments. The Guaymas Basin (Figure 1A) constitutes one of these segments, where seafloor spreading is thought to have initiated at roughly 6 Ma (). The basin is semi-enclosed, with highly productive surface waters underlain by an oxygen minimum zone (OMZ) between ca. 0.5 and 1 km water depth (). Between the base of the OMZ and the basin sill depth (c 1.5 km), oxic Pacific Deep Water enters and replenishes waters in the lower, enclosed part of the Guaymas Basin (Figure 1B; ).
FIGURE 1
As with other basins in the Gulf of California, the high productivity and rapid sedimentation in the Guaymas Basin have resulted in the deposition of >100 m thick, organic-rich diatomaceous sediments (
Igneous intrusions in the subsurface of the Guaymas Basin drive a variety of seafloor hydrothermal systems. Most of the hydrothermal systems identified to date occur in the Southern Trough (Figure 1C). However, the insulating properties of the overlying sedimentary package mean that igneous intrusions can also be found tens of kilometers off-axis, resulting in cold seeps and some hydrothermal vents at large distances from the axes of oceanic spreading (e.g.,
Intrusion of magmatic material into organic-rich sediments in the Guaymas Basin stimulates hydrothermal systems that are rich in thermogenic alteration products including CO2, a variety of hydrocarbons (e.g., CH4;
The location and color of Beggiatoa mats reflect the hydrothermal seepage regime. These chemosynthetic bacteria store both elemental sulfur (S0) and nitrate (NO3–) intracellularly. The Beggiatoa use HS– as an electron donor and NO3– as an electron acceptor, reducing the latter to either N2 (denitrification) or NH4+ (dissimilatory nitrate reduction to ammonium, DNRA). The DNRA pathway generates more energy than denitrification per molecule of NO3– and so is favored when HS– is abundant. However, denitrification requires fewer electrons (five per NO3– rather than eight for DNRA), rendering it favored under HS–-limited conditions and when the bacteria have to rely on stored electron donors (S0) within their cells (
To investigate the genesis and mobility of nutrient-rich fluids in the hydrothermal seep systems of the Guaymas basin that sustained the microbial mats, including Beggiatoa, we studied sediment and porewaters from active seeps. To ensure that the results are transferrable to studies of fossilized hydrothermal systems, we used established organic and inorganic geochemical proxies (e.g.,
2 Materials and methods
2.1 Sampling
We analyzed shallow sediment cores from active hydrothermal seeps in the Guaymas Basin, covered with microbial mats (
TABLE 1
| Core ID | Collection date | Location | Water depth | General description |
| 4564-13 | 25/11/2009 | 27° 00.445 N/111° 24.530 W | 2003 m | White Beggiatoa mats |
| 4572-15 | 03/12/2009 | 27° 00.445 N/111° 24.530 W | 2003 m | Brown sediment, no Beggiatoa mat |
| 4572-16 | 03/12/2009 | 27° 00.449 N/111° 24.532 W | 2003 m | Orange Beggiatoa mat |
| 4870-7 | 20/12/2016 | 27° 00.710 N/ 111° 24.22 7 W | 2007 m | Heavily oily sediment, with flocculous white sulfur precipitates |
Details of the sediment push cores analysed in this study.
FIGURE 2

Beggiatoa microbial mat sampling site near Mat Mound Massif. The “fried egg” appearance of different Beggiatoa populations, with orange coloration at the center and white coloration at the periphery, corresponds to different intensities of hydrothermal upflow (
FIGURE 3

The “Witches’ Cauldron,” a highly active hydrocarbon- and sulfur-rich seep in the Cathedral Hill area with microbial mats visible on the surface. (A) Meter-scale towers formed of gray/brown baked oil-sediment concretions. White patches are sulfur flocs, which are only known from the most active seepage areas in the basin. Yellow patches are Beggiatoa mats. (B) Sample site for core 4870-7, brown-grey oily sediment at the base of the towers covered by a thin veneer of white sulfur flocs. (C) Disturbance of the sulfur flocs (yellow arrow) after temperature probe measurement (see also Supplementary Figure 1). Photos were taken during Alvin Dive 4870 on Dec 22, 2016, and are available on the Alvin framegrabber site (http://4dgeo.whoi.edu/alvin).
2.2 Stable isotopes
For organic carbon and nitrogen isotope analysis, roughly 0.5 g aliquots of dried sediment samples were mixed with 1 M HCl in glass centrifuge tubes and stirred with a glass rod. The tubes were then loosely capped and left to react in a fume hood at room temperature overnight. The next day, samples were centrifuged at 700 rpm, the supernatant was decanted and fresh 1 M HCl was mixed with the samples. After 4 hours, the samples were centrifuged and the supernatant decanted, before washing with DI water (stirring with a glass rod), centrifuging and decanting the supernatant. The DI water rinse was repeated a further two times, then the sample residues were dried in an oven at 70°C for 2–3 days. The dry samples were stored in glass scintillation vials. The glassware used for sample preparation and storage was pre-combusted at 500°C. Samples aliquots were weighed into 8 × 5 mm tin capsules and analyzed by flash combustion using an elemental analyzer (EA Isolink; Thermo Fisher) coupled via a Conflo IV to a MAT253 isotope ratio mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher) at the University of St Andrews. Measurements were calibrated using the standards USGS-41a and USGS-40 and results are expressed in delta notation as (δ15N = [(15N/14N)sample/(15N/14N)standard – 1] × 1000) versus air for nitrogen and (δ13C = [(13C/12C)sample/(13C/12C)standard – 1] × 1000) versus the Vienna Peedee Belemnite (VPDB) standard for carbon. The USGS-62 (δ13C = −14.82 ± 0.10‰ [1σ], δ15N = 20.66 ± 0.24‰ [1σ], n = 12) and SDo-1 (δ13C = −30.35 ± 0.11‰ [1σ], δ15N = −0.56 ± 0.77‰ [1σ], n = 4) standards were used to test reproducibility, and the results agree well with published values (USGS-62: δ13C = −14.79 ± 0.04‰, δ15N = 20.17 ± 0.06‰,
2.3 Porewater analyses
Porewater NH4+ concentrations were determined following the colorimetric method of
Porewater δ15N was determined for a subset of samples using a microdiffusion method, which builds on that of
2.4 Trace element analysis
Major and trace element concentration data were acquired for aliquots of dried sediment by Australian Lab Services (ALS) in Dublin, Ireland. Following digestion in HNO3, HF, HClO4, and HCl, samples were analyzed via inductively coupled plasma mass spectroscopy (ICP-MS; MS-ME61r method). Reproducibility, based on duplicate analysis of a sample and the OREAS 920 standard, was better than 8% for the elements used in this study, with the exception of As, Ca and Sb, for which the reproducibility was better than 13%. Reproducibility for Ag with the OREAS 920 standard (44%; 0.15 ppm) was notably worse than the sample replicate (6%; 11.15 ppm), possibly due to low concentration. For three samples, the Ag concentration was also measured using inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectroscopy (ICP-AES), following digestion in HF, HNO3, HClO4 and HCl (Ag – OG62 method). Reproducibility based on Ag replicate analysis with the OG62 method was 3.4%. We note that the reproducibility of certain elements was comparatively poor, possibly due to complex oil-bearing matrices. However, the relative trends discussed below are not impacted by the precision.
3 Results
3.1 Organically-associated metal enrichment
To examine the impact of migrated hydrocarbons on the delivery of nutrient metals to the seafloor, we used major and trace element data to examine element-specific enrichments associated with organic carbon in sediment. The trace element composition of the sediment is similar to upper continental crust, with alteration or “weathering” likely due to hydrothermal alteration (Supplementary Figures 1, 2). Thus, when discussing enrichment or depletion of chemical elements in sediment, we use Al-normalized element enrichment factors (EF) relative to an average upper continental crust composition (
In core 4870-7, we find several trace elements, including nutrient and toxic metals, which appear to have been mobilized by migrated hydrocarbons (oil) (Figure 4, Supplementary Figures 2, 4). In particular, Ag, As, S, and Sb have moderate to very high enrichment factors (up to AgEF = 9368) and show more covariance with total organic carbon (TOC) than the other cores (Figures 4A–D). Europium (Eu) anomalies (calculated as Eu[SN]/Eu[SN]* = 2 x Eu[SN]/Sm[SN] + Gd[SN], where SN indicates normalization to Post-Archean Australian Shale;
FIGURE 4

Elemental enrichment in the oily and non-oily cores, relative to total organic carbon. (A–D), elemental enrichment factors (E,F) relative to UCC. (E) Europium anomalies and (F) light rare earth/heavy rare earth element ratio, relative to total organic carbon. Note the increased variability in organic carbon and elemental enrichment in the oily core samples.
FIGURE 5

Selected elements that are enriched in shallow Beggiatoa mat sediments from core 4564-13.
The accumulation of metals within sediment can also be influenced by environmental redox conditions. In anoxic/euxinic conditions, metallic elements in the water column can be bound within sulfide minerals or adsorbed onto sedimentary organic matter, which degrades more slowly than in oxic settings. Thus, it is important to understand whether some of the elemental enrichment observed could be associated with broader environmental deoxygenation, rather than hydrothermal fluids or microbial mat processes. Today, the bottom water of the Southern Trough is weakly oxic (
3.2 Sedimentary C, N and P data
We quantified organic C, along with total N and P, and performed stable isotope analyses of C and N to place our sediment samples into the context of hydrothermal vs. non-hydrothermal settings in Guaymas Basin. This allowed us to identify additional spatial trends that are associated with biological or abiotic chemical processes in seep environments. Sediment δ13C and δ15N data fall mostly within a narrow range (δ13C mean = −22.1 ± 0.8 [1σ], δ15N mean = 8.56 ± 0.4 [1σ], n = 30, excluding outliers) with two samples that are notable outliers, being depleted in both 15N (δ15N ≈ 6‰) and 13C (δ13C ≈−24.5‰) relative to other samples (Figures 6, 7). Our data are thus on average slightly lower in both δ13C and δ15N compared to the majority of sediment data that have been reported from outside of the hydrothermally active Southern Trough (δ13C mean = −20.7 ± 0.4 [1σ], δ15N mean = 10.0 ± 0.6 [1σ], n = 129;
FIGURE 6

Core temperatures measured at 10 cm intervals via thermal probe, sediment δ15N, δ13C and C/N ratio, and porewater (PW) NH4+ concentration for cores (A–D) 4564-13, (F–J) 4572-15, (K–O) 4572-16, and (P–T) 4870-7. Core 4870-7 was taken between two temperatures profiles (P). It was not possible to extract sufficient porewater from core 4870-7 for analysis (T). An estimated δ15N value for the local seawater (SW) nitrate is shown in blue (see text for details). In the absence of direct measurements of local seawater nitrate (NO3<suprm>–</suprm>) δ15N, we take the approximate isotopic composition of Pacific Deep Water nitrate at 1500 m depth in the adjacent Carmen Basin (δ15N ≈ 6.8‰;
FIGURE 7

(A) Sediment δ13C and δ15N cross plot including data from this study and “background” samples taken outside of the Southern Trough from
In cores 4564-13, 4572-15 and 4572-16, sediments below around 7 cm have a consistent C/N of 21 ± 2 [1σ]. For shallower samples (in core 4564-13), C/N ratios are lower but show an increase with depth, from a C/N of 9 to 21 (Figure 6). In the oily core (4870-7), values also increase with depth but are notably higher than in the oil-free cores, starting from 15 at 0.5 cm depth and stabilizing at around 42 from 4.5 cm depth downward (Figures 6, 8). The samples from core 4870-7 also follow a different trajectory to those from core 4564-13 (Figure 8). In core 4564-13, both carbon and nitrogen are lost with increasing depth. From the seafloor to around 7 cm depth, nitrogen is lost preferentially over carbon, and from 9 cm onward both are lost in more equal proportions, hence C/N is more stable (Figure 8A). In oily core 4870-7, nitrogen is lost progressively with depth, but TOC reaches a maximum (14.3%) at 6.5 cm depth. Similarly, phosphorus appears to be progressively depleted from surface to deeper sediments, from a maximum PEF of 2.4 (corresponding to 1210 ppm P) to a PEF of around 1.5 in the non-oily cores. The oily core (4870-7) also displays depletion from seafloor to depth, but the PEF stabilizes at values of around 1.2 below 2.5 cm depth (Figure 8B).
FIGURE 8

Total organic carbon versus (A) total nitrogen and (B) P enrichment factor for all samples, grouped by core. Arrows indicate general trends with increasing depth. The “Background” trendline in panel (A) was produced using pooled data from
Ammonium can substitute for K in mineral lattices, as the two share the same charge and similar ionic radii (
Porewater NH4+ concentrations show similar patterns throughout each core analyzed, but the concentrations vary between cores, with samples from hotter areas containing higher NH4+ concentrations (4572-15 = 0.3 mM ± 0.2 [1σ], Tmax = 14°C; 4564-13 = 3.5 mM ± 0.2 [1σ], Tmax = 63°C; 4572-16 = 4.4 mM ± 0.3 [1σ], Tmax = 98°C). In core 4564-13, the porewater NH4+ concentrations are relatively constant from the base up to 9 cm with a mean of 3.58 mM (± 0.11 1σ) before dropping to 3.0 mM at 7 cm depth (Figure 6). The concentrations then increase again to 4.0 mM at the top. Porewater δ15NNH4+ data for the two hotter cores are very similar across the same depths (pooled δ15NNH4+ mean = 8.6 ± 0.1 [1σ]; Figure 5, Supplementary Figure 8), though no samples were available for depths shallower than 9 cm in core 4572-16. For the shallower microbial mat samples (in core 4564-13), δ15NNH4+ reaches a maximum value of 10.0‰ at 5 cm depth, before dropping to a value of 5.7‰ at 1 cm depth (Figures 6, 9). Porewater δ15NNH4+ is generally within error of sedimentary δ15N values, except between roughly 9 cm and 3 cm depth in core 4564-13, where porewater δ15NNH4+ is up to 1.3‰ higher (Figure 9).
FIGURE 9

Total nitrogen and ammonium data from core 4564-13. (A) Sediment and corresponding porewater δ15N. (B) Porewater NH4+ (mM) and sedimentary nitrogen (%) concentrations plotted together. Shaded envelope marks the section of the core where sediment and porewater δ15N values begin to deviate notably in panel (A). Note the elevated porewater δ15N in panel (A) and depleted porewater NH4+ concentration in panel B at 5 cm depth.
3.3 Quantification of flow velocities and nitrogen fluxes
We used two approaches to explore the local and basin-scale implications of our analytical results. First, we calculated the ammonium seepage fluxes at three core sites using temperature and porewater data. We then used the sediment data to constrain the contribution of shallowly derived (< 40 cm depth) sedimentary nitrogen to the total basin hydrothermal flux. Details of the upscaling approaches used are presented in Supplementary File S2.
To explore differences in flow regime across one of the seepage sites, hydrothermal velocities were estimated at 20 cm depth in three of the cores, using the approach of
TABLE 2
Core ID | Calculated flow velocity at 20 cm depth (m s1) based on thermal data | Porewater ammonium flux (μmol m2s1) based on thermal and pore fluid data | Sedimentary ammonium loss (μmol m2s1) |
| 4564-13 | −2.9 × 10–7 | −1.04 | −0.00433 to −0.0135 |
| 4572-15 | 4.4 × 10–7 | 0.13 | – |
| 4572-16 | −8.8 × 10–7 | −3.68 | – |
Calculated flow velocities for cores at 20 cm depth, with corresponding porewater ammonium fluxes calculated using thermal data and average porewater ammonium concentration from the two closest samples in each core. Core 4870-7 is omitted due to a lack of extractable pore fluid. The sedimentary ammonium loss was calculated using sediment N data from the top of 4564-13 (it was not possible to apply this calculation to the other cores due to lack of samples). Negative values indicate upward migration.
The flow velocities calculated above are useful for exploring local variability in flow regime, but also highlight that a more complex fluid flow model would be required to upscale and estimate the corresponding hydrothermal ammonium fluxes from the whole Trough. Thus, in our second approach we examined the core sediments as a time-integrated (i.e., long-term) record of nitrogen loss. A piecewise function was fitted to the sedimentary nitrogen abundance data from 4564-13 (Figure 9B, Supplementary File S2). The function follows an exponential curve of the form y = y0 ⋅ ax (where y = nitrogen content, y0 = nitrogen content at seafloor, a = loss coefficient, and x = depth) from seafloor to ca. 7 cm depth. We assume that the remaining nitrogen is resistant to hydrothermal remobilization in the remaining interval. The curve gives an integrated nitrogen loss of around 54% within the top ∼7 cm of sediment (Supplementary File S2). If we assume a sedimentation rate of roughly of 0.08–0.25 cm/yr (
4 Discussion
4.1 Hydrothermal mobility of biologically-active metals and organic complexation
Hydrothermal systems at oceanic spreading centers can supply metallic nutrients and drive productivity at a regional scale (
Once metal-bearing hydrothermal fluids reach the seafloor, microbial processes could provide additional mechanisms for concentrating transported metals in sediment. Sulfate-reducing metabolisms are found within meso- and thermophile microbial communities in the Guaymas Basin (
Certain elements (e.g., Cd, Cu, Ni, Se) are notably enriched within shallow Beggiatoa mat (non-oily) samples (Figure 5), despite oxic conditions in the overlying water column (Supplementary Figure 1;
Many of the elements that are enriched in oily samples (e.g., Zn, Supplementary data table in BGS repository and Supplementary Figure 4) are important nutrients for the biosphere, while others (e.g., Ag, As, Cd) can impair cellular function. Microbial communities in extreme environments are adapted to cope with toxic metals and high metal concentrations. This is often achieved through efficient efflux mechanisms, as with organisms like Thermococcus and Pyrococcus (
4.2 Sedimentary nitrogen mobilization
The interaction between hydrothermal fluid seepage and organic matter motivates further investigations into the behavior of important organic-bound nutrients (e.g., nitrogen) in the system.
The shallowest (microbial mat) sample from core 4564-13 has a N/C ratio (N/C [g/g = 0.133) that is similar to background (non-hydrothermal) sediments (N/C [g/g] ≈ 0.131;
In the non-oily cores, PEF drops rapidly over the same depth interval as nitrogen, before stabilizing at PEF ≈ 1.5 (Figure 8B). Thus, it appears that P, another biologically-limiting nutrient, is also being lost from sedimentary organic material as a result of hydrothermal alteration. In the oily core, PEF drops with depth but stabilizes at approximately crustal values (PEF ≈ 1). The enhanced P depletion in the oily core could be associated with enhanced heterotrophic microbial activity and sulfate reduction, which would result in additional organic-P remineralization. The results highlight that hydrothermal fluids can directly (via thermal alteration) and indirectly (via stimulation of heterotrophic activity) facilitate recycling of essential nutrients from buried biomass.
4.3 Quantifying nitrogen mobilization
The calculated fluid flow velocities at three of the core sites are highly variable (Table 2). This is because hydrothermal circulation creates a complex field of fluid flow directions and magnitudes in the shallow sediments of the Southern Trough. The corresponding (absolute) hydrothermal ammonium fluxes at the seepage site (0.13–3.68 μmol m–2s–1; Table 2) are ca. three orders of magnitude higher than the estimated nitrogen input from sedimentation (3.73–11.65 nmol m–2s–1; Supplementary File S2). Since hydrothermal discharge zones (vents and seeps marked by Beggiatoa mats) occupy a relatively small proportion of the seafloor in the Southern Trough, the loss via hydrothermal discharge over a small total area more closely balances the supply from widespread sedimentation across the whole of the Trough.
We expect that the estimated ammonium flux from shallow sediment (4.33–13.52 nmol m–2s–1) will be more representative across a larger area of the Southern Trough. Although the lack of shallow samples from the other (non-oily) cores prevents direct comparison across sites, the C and N data consistently indicate nitrogen losses of strikingly similar magnitude within the top <10 cm of sediment (Figures 6, 8), despite differences in temperature and flow velocity at the time of coring. This may reflect the temporal variability in the hydrothermal flow regime, with short-term changes in flow pathways resulting in an overall similar magnitude of nitrogen loss over an area. Hydrothermal flow pathways in the Southern Trough are known to be highly transitory, with seeps and associated thermal anomalies that can disappear within less than a year (
The ammonium fluxes calculated from temperature and porewater data in cores 4564-13 and 4572-16 (0.13–3.68 μmol m2s1; Table 2) exceed the rate at which nitrogen is being lost from the sediment (i.e., the sediment loss flux of 4.33–13.52 nmol m–2s–1; Table 2). Most likely, this result reflects the exogenous origin of the majority of the porewater ammonium, which has migrated with hydrothermal fluids into the sediment from elsewhere (e.g., from deeper sediments).
By upscaling the loss of nitrogen that we observe from shallow sediment in the Southern Trough, we can now explore the contribution of shallowly-buried biomass to the total basin hydrothermal ammonium flux. More than half (ca. 54%) of the sedimentary nitrogen is lost rapidly in the surface (<10 cm) sediment at the non-oily seepage site (Figure 9B). However, to place this result in context, we also need to account for ammonium released from deeper sediment, which likely forms a larger component of the fluids released from hotter, channelized vent systems in the Basin.
4.4 Implications for microbial nitrogen utilization by seep communities
Having established the presence of hydrothermal ammonium seepage, we first explore the effects of this flux locally on microbial communities, using isotopic data, before discussing broader basin-scale effects on nutrient budgets. Sedimentary δ13C and δ15N are generally ca. 1.4‰ lower than the pelagically-dominated background sediments outside of the Southern Trough (Figure 7). There, δ15N is on average relatively high (9.97‰, ± 0.64 [1σ];
FIGURE 10

Sketch illustration of nitrogen cycling around a hydrothermal seep in the Guaymas Basin’s Southern Trough. Beggiatoa-dominated microbial mats assimilate Pacific Deepwater nitrate, while the surrounding sediment surface is dominated by hemipelagic sediment (diatomite). The lower parts of the mat are progressively degraded, liberating ammonium, which is mobilized by hydrothermal fluids that also carry ammonium from depth. The deep sediment represents a mix of more recalcitrant mat-derived and hemipelagic material, which has a consistent δ15N laterally. The question mark “?” highlights uncertainty as to whether some of the hydrothermal NH4+ is utilized by mat organisms. Particulate organic matter is abbreviated as POM.
Localized isotopic fractionation and concurrent NH4+ depletion in the white Beggiatoa mat sediments in 4564-13 could indicate some microbial utilization of porewater NH4+ (Figure 9). However, the calculated isotopic fractionation (ca. 10‰; Supplementary Figure 9) is lower than measured values associated with other NH4+- consuming metabolic processes (e.g., anammox, 23.5–29.1‰;
4.5 Implications for basin-scale ammonium utilization
Having placed new quantitative constraints on the magnitude and timeframe of nitrogen loss from shallow sediment, we can incorporate published records from this well-studied basin to explore possible basin-scale implications for microbial productivity. We acknowledge limitations with regard to the spatial extent of our sample set and highlight that the ammonium loss from shallow sediment will vary across the hydrothermally active Southern and Northern Troughs (as does heat flow;
Extrapolating the observed shallow sedimentary nitrogen loss across the hydrothermally active Southern and Northern Troughs, the liberated nitrogen could sustain up to around 10–7 kg of biomass (as dry carbon) each year (Supplementary File S2), assuming a molar C:N ratio of 106:16 for fresh biomass. As an exercise, if we assume steady state, complete vertical mixing and treat the Guaymas Basin as closed, the remobilized nitrogen could sustain additional productivity of around 19–61 mmol C m–2yr–1 (Supplementary File S2) in the basin. These values are equivalent to roughly 0.4%–1.3% of the typical biological export production in the basin (ca. 4.8 mol C m–2yr–1;
4.6 Conclusion and outlook
We deployed techniques that are commonly used to understand nutrient cycling in the rock record, in combination with porewater analysis and published observations from the hydrothermally active Guaymas Basin. In doing so, we have highlighted some of the dynamics within this system that would be obscured in the rock record.
The mobility and accumulation of trace metals appears to be enhanced through association with migrated hydrocarbons and microbial mats at the study sites, despite being an overall metal-poor system. This could occur directly, through processes like organometallic complexation with migrated hydrocarbons, or indirectly, via metabolic processes like heterotrophy and sulfide precipitation. Several metals are concentrated within hydrocarbon-rich seeps, including ore-grade concentrations of Ag. Seafloor microbial mats are enriched in metals like Cd, but the breakdown of buried mat material via hydrothermal and biological processes means that the shallow sediments function as dynamic reservoirs for those elements. Thus, the enrichment patterns of nutrient or potentially toxic metals highlighted here could be exerting a control on microbial community composition (
We have also shown that breakdown of organic material via hydrothermal activity liberates important nutrients like phosphorus and nitrogen from sediment, which could be contributing to enhanced productivity higher in the water column. The results show a contrast in terms of isotopic composition and mobility of the endogenous (mat-derived) and exogenous (pelagic-dominated) nitrogen fractions in the sediment. Often it is assumed that the δ15N composition of sediment is representative of the parent organic material is (e.g.,
Remobilization of nitrogen from sediments due to fluid flow has been invoked to explain depleted N/C ratios in several geological studies, which have in-turn been used to make inferences about nutrient cycling in deep time (e.g.,
Statements
Data availability statement
All data generated in this project are available from the National Geoscience Data Centre of the British Geological Survey under: https://doi.org/10.5285/53da3dd9-e831-4c4e-8879-c8e8a014ed4d. Supplementary File S2, containing code generated in this study, is available in a Zenodo repository with the identifier: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15782744.
Author contributions
NR-B: Formal Analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – original draft, Writing – review and editing. AL: Investigation, Methodology, Writing – review and editing. GM: Methodology, Writing – review and editing. AT: Resources, Writing – review and editing. ES: Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Methodology, Resources, Supervision, Writing – review and editing.
Funding
The author(s) declare that financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article. This work was financially supported by a NERC Frontiers grant (NE/V010824/1) and a Leverhulme Trust grant (RPG-2022-313) to EES, as well as a UKRI fellowship (MR/W013835/1) to GM.
Acknowledgments
We thank the captain and crew of the RV Atlantis and the Alvin team for their expert handling of dives and core retrieval. Sampling in Guayas Basin was supported by NSF Biological Oceanography (Grant No. 1357238) to AT. We thank Angus McLuskie for technical assistance. In order to meet institutional and research funder open access requirements, any accepted manuscript arising shall be open access under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) reuse license with zero embargo.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Generative AI statement
The authors declare that no Generative AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Supplementary material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2025.1523696/full#supplementary-material
References
1
AltabetM. A.PilskalnC.ThunellR.PrideC.SigmanD.ChavezF.et al (1999). The nitrogen isotope biogeochemistry of sinking particles from the margin of the eastern North Pacific.Deep-Sea Res. Part I: Oceanograph. Res. Pap.46655–679. 10.1016/S0967-0637(98)00084-3
2
BiniE. (2010). Archaeal transformation of metals in the environment.FEMS Microbiol. Ecol.731–16. 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2010.00876.x
3
BoudouJ. P.SchimmelmannA.AderM.MastalerzM.SebiloM.GengembreL. (2008). Organic nitrogen chemistry during low-grade metamorphism.Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta721199–1221. 10.1016/j.gca.2007.12.004
4
BrayN. A. (1988). Water mass formation in the Gulf of California.J. Geophys. Res. Oceans939223–9240. 10.1029/jc093ic08p09223
5
BredehoeftJ. D.PapaopulosI. S. (1965). Rates of vertical groundwater movement estimated from the Earth’s thermal profile.Water Resources Res.1325–328. 10.1029/WR001i002p00325
6
BrunnerB.ContrerasS.LehmannM. F.MatantsevaO.RollogM.KalvelageT.et al (2013). Nitrogen isotope effects induced by anammox bacteria.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.11018994–18999. 10.1073/pnas.1310488110
7
BuckleyA.MacGregorB.TeskeA. (2019). Identification, expression and activity of candidate nitrite reductases from orange beggiatoaceae, guaymas basin.Front. Microbiol.10:644. 10.3389/fmicb.2019.00644
8
BusignyV.BeboutG. E. (2013). Nitrogen in the silicate earth:Speciation and isotopic behavior during mineral-fluid interactions.Elements9353–358. 10.2113/gselements.9.5.353
9
CalvertS. E. (1966). Accumulation of diatomaceous silica in the sediments of the gulf of California.Bull. Geol. Soc. Am.77569–596. 10.1130/0016-7606196677[569:AODSIT]2.0.CO;2
10
CampbellA. C.GieskesJ. M. (1984). Water column anomalies associated with hydrothermal activity in the Guaymas Basin, Gulf of California.Earth Plan. Sci. Lett.6857–72. 10.1016/0012-821X(84)90140-7
11
ChangA. S.PichevinL.PedersenT. F.GrayV.GaneshramR. (2015). New insights into productivity and redox-controlled trace element (Ag, Cd, Re, and Mo) accumulation in a 55 kyr long sediment record from Guaymas Basin, Gulf of California.Paleoceanography3077–94. 10.1002/2014PA002681
12
CleavesH. J.ChalmersJ. H.LazcanoA.MillerS. L.BadaJ. L. (2008). A reassessment of prebiotic organic synthesis in neutral planetary atmospheres.Orig. Life Evol. Biospheres38105–115. 10.1007/s11084-007-9120-3
13
CoplenT. B. (2019). Report of stable isotopic composition reference materials USGS61, USGS62, and USGS63.Reston, VA: Reston Stable Isotope Laboratory, United States Geological Survey.
14
De La Lanza-EspinoG.SotoL. A. (1999). Sedimentary geochemistry of hydrothermal vents in Guaymas Basin, Gulf of California, Mexico.Appl. Geochem.14499–510. 10.1016/S0883-2927(98)00064-X
15
DeMasterD. J. (1981). The supply and accumulation of silica in the marine environment.Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta451715–1732. 10.1016/0016-7037(81)90006-5
16
DeMetsC. (1995). A reappraisal of seafloor spreading lineations in the Gulf of California: Implications for the transfer of Baja California to the Pacific Plate and estimates of Pacific-North America Motion.Geophys. Res. Lett.223545–3548. 10.1029/95GL03323
17
DennenK. O.JohnsonC. A.OtterM. L.SilvaS. R.WandlessG. A. (2006). δ15N and non-carbonate δ13C values for two petroleum source rock reference materials and a marine sediment reference material, U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2006–1071.Reston, VA: United States Geological Survey.
18
DowellF.CardmanZ.DasarathyS.KellermannM. Y.LippJ. S.RuffS. E.et al (2016). Microbial communities in methane- and short chain alkane-rich hydrothermal sediments of Guaymas Basin.Front. Microbiol.7:17. 10.3389/fmicb.2016.00017
19
EdgcombV. P.MolyneauxS. J.SaitoM. A.LloydK.BöerS.WirsenC. O.et al (2004). Sulfide ameliorates metal toxicity for deep-sea hydrothermal vent archaea.Appl. Environ. Microbiol.70255–215. 10.1128/AEM.70.4.2551-2555.2004
20
EdgcombV. P.TeskeA. P.MaraP. (2022). Microbial hydrocarbon degradation in guaymas basin—exploring the roles and potential interactions of fungi and sulfate-reducing bacteria.Front. Microbiol.13:831828. 10.3389/fmicb.2022.831828
21
EngelenB.NguyenT.HeyerhoffB.KalenbornS.SydowK.TabaiH.et al (2021). Microbial communities of hydrothermal guaymas basin surficial sediment profiled at 2 millimeter-scale resolution.Front. Microbiol.12:710881. 10.3389/fmicb.2021.710881
22
GartmanA.FindlayA. J. (2020). Impacts of hydrothermal plume processes on oceanic metal cycles and transport.Nat. Geosci.13396–402. 10.1038/s41561-020-0579-0
23
GeilertS.HensenC.SchmidtM.LiebetrauV.ScholzF.DollM.et al (2018). On the formation of hydrothermal vents and cold seeps in the Guaymas Basin, Gulf of California.Biogeosciences155715–5731. 10.5194/bg-15-5715-2018
24
GonzalezC. A.ChoquetteS. J. (2023). Reference material 8547, IAEA-N-1 (Nitrogen Isotopes in Ammonium Sulfate), reference material information sheet.Gaithersburg, MD: National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), US Department of Commerce.
25
GraybealF. T.VikreP. G. (2010). “A review of silver-rich mineral deposits and their metallogeny,” in The challenge of finding new mineral resources: Global metallogeny, innovative exploration, and new discoveries, Special Publications of the Society of Economic Geology, Vol. 15, eds. GoldfarbR. J.MarshE. E.MoneckeT. (New York, NY: GSW). 10.5382/SP.15.1.07
26
JannaschH. W.NelsonD. C.WirsenC. O. (1989). Massive natural occurrence of unusually large bacteria (Beggiatoa sp.) at a hydrothermal deep-sea vent site.Nature342834–836. 10.1038/342834a0
27
KippM. A.Krissansen-TottonJ.CatlingD. C. (2021). High organic burial efficiency is required to explain mass balance in earth’s early carbon cycle.Global Biogeochem. Cycles35:e2020GB006707. 10.1029/2020GB006707
28
LamT. Y. P. (2004). Microbial ammonia oxidation in deep-sea hydrothermal plumes.Honolulu, HI: University of Hawai’i at Manoa.
29
LizarraldeD.AxenG. J.BrownH. E.FletcherJ. M.González-FernándezA.HardingA. J.et al (2007). Variation in styles of rifting in the Gulf of California.Nature448466–469. 10.1038/nature06035
30
LonsdaleP.BeckerK. (1985). Hydrothermal plumes, hot springs, and conductive heat flow in the Southern Trough of Guaymas Basin.Earth Plan. Sci. Lett.73211–225. 10.1016/0012-821X(85)90070-6
31
MartinA. N.StüekenE. E.GehringerM. M.MarkowskaM.VonhofH.WeyerS.et al (2025). Anomalous δ15N values in the Neoarchean associated with an abundant supply of hydrothermal ammonium.Nat. Commun.16:1873. 10.1038/s41467-025-57091-3
32
MartinA. N.StüekenE. E.MichaudJ. A. S.MünkerC.WeyerS.van HeesE. H. P.et al (2024). Mechanisms of nitrogen isotope fractionation at an ancient black smoker in the 2.7 Ga Abitibi greenstone belt. Canada.Geology52181–186. 10.1130/G51689.1
33
McKayL. J.MacGregorB. J.BiddleJ. F.AlbertD. B.MendlovitzH. P.HoerD. R.et al (2012). Spatial heterogeneity and underlying geochemistry of phylogenetically diverse orange and white Beggiatoa mats in Guaymas Basin hydrothermal sediments.Deep-Sea Res. Part I: Oceanograph. Res. Papers6721–31. 10.1016/j.dsr.2012.04.011
34
MooreE. K.JelenB. I.GiovannelliD.RaananH.FalkowskiP. G. (2017). Metal availability and the expanding network of microbial metabolisms in the Archaean eon.Nat. Geosci.10629–636. 10.1038/ngeo3006
35
NeumannF.Negrete-ArandaR.HarrisR. N.ContrerasJ.GalerneC. Y.Peña-SalinasM. S.et al (2023). Heat flow and thermal regime in the Guaymas Basin, Gulf of California: Estimates of conductive and advective heat transport.Basin Res.351308–1328. 10.1111/bre.12755
36
PourmandA.DauphasN.IrelandT. J. (2012). A novel extraction chromatography and MC-ICP-MS technique for rapid analysis of REE, Sc and Y: Revising CI-chondrite and Post-Archean Australian Shale (PAAS) abundances.Chem. Geol.29138–54. 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2011.08.011
37
RamírezG. A.McKayL. J.FieldsM. W.BuckleyA.MorteraC.HensenC.et al (2020). The guaymas basin subseafloor sedimentary archaeome reflects complex environmental histories.iscience23:101459. 10.1016/j.isci.2020.101459
38
RedfieldA. C. (1958). The biological control of chemical factors in the environment.Am. Sci.46230A–221.
39
RudnickR. L.GaoS. (2013). “Composition of the continental crust,” in Treatise on geochemistry, 2nd Edn, edsHollandH. D.TurekianK. K. (Oxford: Elsevier).
40
SchineC. M. S.AlderkampA. C.van DijkenG.GerringaL. J. A.SergiS.LaanP.et al (2021). Massive Southern Ocean phytoplankton bloom fed by iron of possible hydrothermal origin.Nat. Commun.12:1211. 10.1038/s41467-021-21339-5
41
SchutteC. A.TeskeA.MacGregorB. J.Salman-CarvalhoV.LavikG.HachP.et al (2018). Filamentous giant Beggiatoaceae from the Guaymas Basin are capable of both denitrification and dissimilatory nitrate reduction to ammonium.Appl. Environ. Microbiol.84:e02860-17. 10.1128/AEM.02860-17
42
SeewaldJ. S.Geoffrey WheatC.ReevesE. P.TiveyM. K.SievertS. M.StakesD.et al (2024). Spatial evolution and temporal stability of hydrothermal processes at sediment-covered spreading centers: Constraints from Guaymas Basin, Gulf of California.Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta36787–106. 10.1016/j.gca.2023.12.006
43
StüekenE. E.BoocockT. J.RobinsonA.MikhailS.JohnsonB. W. (2021a). Hydrothermal recycling of sedimentary ammonium into oceanic crust and the Archean ocean at 3.24 Ga.Geology49822–826. 10.1130/G48844.1
44
StüekenE. E.GregoryD. D.MukherjeeI.McGoldrickP. (2021b). Sedimentary exhalative venting of bioavailable nitrogen into the early ocean.Earth Plan. Sci. Lett.565:116963. 10.1016/j.epsl.2021.116963
45
StüekenE. E.KirsimäeK.LeplandA.PraveA. R. (2023). Hydrothermal regeneration of ammonium as a basin-scale driver of primary productivity.Astrobiology23195–212. 10.1089/ast.2021.0203
46
TaylorC. D.WirsenC. O. (1997). Microbiology and ecology of filamentous sulfur formation.Science2771483–1485. 10.1126/science.277.5331.1483
47
TeskeA. (2020). “Guaymas Basin, a hydrothermal hydrocarbon seep ecosystem,” in Marine hydrocarbon seeps: Microbiology and biogeochemistry of a global marine habitat, edsTeskeA.CarvalhoV. (New York City, NY: Springer International Publishing).
48
TeskeA.De BeerD.McKayL. J.TiveyM. K.BiddleJ. F.HoerD.et al (2016). The Guaymas Basin hiking guide to hydrothermal mounds, chimneys, and microbial mats: Complex seafloor expressions of subsurface hydrothermal circulation.Front. Microbiol.7:75. 10.3389/fmicb.2016.00075
49
TeskeA.EdgcombV.RiversA. R.ThompsonJ. R.GomezA.deV.et al (2009). A molecular and physiological survey of a diverse collection of hydrothermal vent Thermococcus and Pyrococcus isolates.Extremophiles13905–915. 10.1007/s00792-009-0278-7
50
TeskeA.McKayL. J.RaveloA. C.AielloI.MorteraC.Núñez-UsecheF.et al (2019). Characteristics and evolution of sill-driven off-axis hydrothermalism in guaymas basin – the ringvent site.Sci. Rep.9:13847. 10.1038/s41598-019-50200-5
51
TeskeA.WegenerG.ChantonJ. P.WhiteD.MacGregorB.HoerD.et al (2021). Microbial communities under distinct thermal and geochemical regimes in axial and off-axis sediments of guaymas basin.Front. Microbiol.12:6336469. 10.3389/fmicb.2021.633649
52
Von DammK. L.EdmondJ. M.MeasuresC. I.GrantB. (1985). Chemistry of submarine hydrothermal solutions at Guaymas Basin, Gulf of California.Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta492221–2237. 10.1016/0016-7037(85)90223-6
53
WhiteA. E.FosterR. A.Benitez-NelsonC. R.MasquéP.VerdenyE.PoppB. N.et al (2013). Nitrogen fixation in the Gulf of California and the Eastern Tropical North Pacific.Prog. Oceanography1091–17. 10.1016/j.pocean.2012.09.002
54
WilliamsD. L.BeckerK.LawverL. A.Von HerzenR. P. (1979). Heat flow at the spreading centers of the Guaymas Basin, Gulf of California.J. Geophys. Res.846757–6769. 10.1029/JB084iB12p06757
55
ZhangS.FangY.XiD. (2015). Adaptation of micro-diffusion method for the analysis of 15N natural abundance of ammonium in samples with small volume.Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrometry291297–1306. 10.1002/rcm.7224
Summary
Keywords
hydrothermal, Guaymas Basin, ammonium, Beggiatoa, organo-metal complex
Citation
Rochelle-Bates N, Long A, MacGilchrist GA, Teske A and Stüeken EE (2025) Quantifying hydrothermal ammonium mobilization from sediment and implications for the marine biosphere: a case study from the Guaymas Basin, Gulf of California. Front. Microbiol. 16:1523696. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2025.1523696
Received
06 November 2024
Accepted
25 June 2025
Published
16 July 2025
Volume
16 - 2025
Edited by
Anirban Chakraborty, Idaho State University, United States
Reviewed by
Emma Bell, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Sweden
Jackie Zorz, University of Calgary, Canada
Updates

Check for updates
Copyright
© 2025 Rochelle-Bates, Long, MacGilchrist, Teske and Stüeken.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Nathan Rochelle-Bates, nrb1@st-andrews.ac.uk
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.