Seven-year change of prevalence, clinical risk factors, and mortality of patients with carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae bloodstream infection in a Chinese teaching hospital: a case-case-control study

Carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae bloodstream infection (CRKP-BSI) is a major public health threat worldwide. CRKP-BSI is associated with poor outcomes, elevated morbidity and mortality, and high healthcare costs. Therefore, the identification of risk factors for CRKP-BSI and mortality are critical for preventing and controlling CRKP in hospitals. This retrospective case-case-control study was conducted at General Hospital of Tianjin Medical University, a tertiary teaching hospital, from 2017 to 2023. It included 105 patients with CRKP-BSI (case group 1) and matched 105 patients with carbapenem-susceptible K. pneumoniae bloodstream infection (CSKP-BSI) (case group 2). The control group was selected at a ratio of 1:1:1 (case group 1: case group 2: control) from patients with a positive blood culture (except for K. pneumoniae infection) to analyze risk factors associated with the two case groups and compare the 30-day survival curves using multivariable logistic regression and Kaplan-Meier analyses. Multivariate analysis revealed that liver disease was a risk factor for K. pneumoniae-BSI, and exposure to carbapenem [odds ratio (OR) = 3.24], tigecycline (OR = 3.43), and glucocorticoids (OR = 4.64) were independent risk factors for CRKP-BSI. The 30-day mortality of the CRKP-BSI group was 30.5%, and patient groups, respiratory diseases (HR = 3.52), use of 3rd-generation cephalosporins (HR = 1.92), mechanical ventilation (HR = 2.14), and central venous catheter insertion (HR = 2.85) were independent risk factors, whereas a shorter length of hospitalization was a protective factor for 30-day mortality. The in-hospital mortality in the CRKP-BSI group was 55.2%, and arterial catheter use (OR = 3.76) was an independent risk factor for in-hospital mortality. Several factors were identified to contribute to the development of CRKP-BSI. CRKP isolates were resistant to most antibiotics. Reducing CRKP-BSI-related mortality requires comprehensive consideration of underlying diseases, judicious antibiotic use, and invasive procedures. The high morbidity, mortality, along with the limited therapeutic options for CRKP-BSI, underscore the need for improved detection, identification of risk factors to develop effective preventive measures, and development of novel agents with reliable clinical efficacy against CRKP.

1 Introduction

Carbapenems, a class of broad-spectrum beta-lactam antibiotics, are the primary treatment choice for severe infections caused by multidrug-resistant Enterobacteriaceae. Carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP) was first identified in northeastern USA in the early 2000s (Tzouvelekis et al., 2012); however, with the increasing use of carbapenems in hospitals, the prevalence of CRKP is increasing worldwide and has constituted a serious threat to public health (Bonomo et al., 2018; David et al., 2019; Reyes et al., 2019). In Europe, the resistance rate to CRKP has been reported to be as high as 39.7% (David et al., 2019). In Eastern Mediterranean region, Klebsiella pneumoniae (K. pneumoniae) accounts for over 50% of infections (Prestinaci et al., 2015). According to data from the China Antimicrobial Surveillance Network (CHINET), the resistance rates of K. pneumoniae to imipenem and meropenem have increased steadily from 3 and 2.9% in 2015 to 24.4 and 25% in 2023, respectively (CHINET, 2023). In 2008, the World Health Organization (WHO) classified CRKP as a critical priority on the global priority list of antimicrobial-resistant bacteria (Tacconelli et al., 2018). In 2009, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) classified 18 common multidrug-resistant bacteria into three categories, designating CRKP as an urgent threat to human health (CDC., 2019). The mortality of patients with CRKP bloodstream infection (CRKP-BSI) is significantly high (Xu et al., 2017; Zhu et al., 2020), and BSI has become a major global medical burden (Markwart et al., 2020). The incidence of CRKP-BSI can increase mortality and prolong the length of hospitalization (Schwaber et al., 2008; Stewardson et al., 2019), which is an important clinical threat.

Currently, carbapenemase production is the primary mechanism of resistance in CRKP, with carbapenemases classified into class A (represented by KPC), class B (e.g., NDM, VIM, and IMP), and class D (primarily OXA-48). Overexpression of efflux pumps and loss of outer membrane porins also contribute to the development of resistance. Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC) has emerged as the most prevalent carbapenemase in the United States and Europe (Grundmann et al., 2017; Temkin et al., 2014), and KPC-2 (64.6%) has become the most common carbapenemase in CRKP in China (Han et al., 2020). Plasmid-encoded carbapenemases often carry additional genes that confer resistance to other antibiotics, which can easily spread among bacteria, resulting in outbreaks and limited treatment options. Only a few antibiotics, such as tigecycline and polymyxins, remain effective against CRKP. Although novel antibiotics, such as ceftazidime-avibactam, have emerged for the treatment of CRE infections, they remain ineffective against New Delhi metallo-beta-lactamase (NDM)-producing CRKP (Abe et al., 2022; Chen Y. et al., 2022). Therefore, understanding the risk factors associated with the causes and outcomes of CRKP-BSI is required to reduce its incidence and initiate appropriate therapies.

Several studies have investigated the risk factors for CRKP infection. However, some of these studies employed a case-control design, comparing a CRKP group with a carbapenem-susceptible Klebsiella pneumoniae (CSKP) group. Such a case-control design has an intrinsic flaw as it is based on the “replacement scenario” assumption, in which each patient is assumed to be infected either by antimicrobial-resistant organisms or antimicrobial-susceptible counterparts; however, the patient may be infected by other pathogens or not infected at all. CSKP infections account for only a small proportion of hospitalized cases, making them unrepresentative (Evans and Harris, 2017; Harris et al., 2001; Kaier and Frank, 2013). Therefore, an improved design is required to further elucidate the risk factors for CRKP infection. In this study, we employed a case-case-control design to evaluate the risk factors for CRKP-BSI, providing a foundation for effective control strategies.

2 Materials and methods

2.1 Study design and Patient population

We performed a single-center, 7-year, continuous study of CRKP-BSI strains using specific inclusion and exclusion criteria (Figure 1). A total of 105 clinical CRKP-BSI isolates were collected from Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, a 2,468-bed tertiary-care hospital in China, from January 2017 to December 2023. According to the CDC, BSIs are defined as the isolation of pathogenic organisms from blood culture tests (Calandra and Cohen, 2005). Only the first CRKP or CSKP isolate from the bloodstream of each patient was included. Nosocomial CRKP, CSKP, or control group infections were defined as isolates obtained ≥ 48 hours after hospital admission.

FIGURE 1

Figure 1. Flowchart of sample selection, comparison, and value. From a total of 1,644 samples, 105 CRKP isolates were selected for further analysis. A matched CSKP group and control group were used to analyze the risk factors for CRKP-BSI and CSKP-BSI, from which the risk factors for KP-BSI were obtained. Risk factors for 30-day mortality in CRKP-BSI were also analyzed. Based on the outcome of hospitalized patients, the 105 CRKP isolates were divided into survivors and death to analyze the risk factors for in-hospital mortality. Abbreviations: CRKP-BSI, carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae bloodstream infection; CSKP, carbapenem-susceptible Klebsiella pneumoniae bloodstream infection; CDC, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; NHSN, National Healthcare Safety Network.

The case group included hospitalized patients infected with CRKP-BSI or CSKP-BSI. Inpatients who met any of the following criteria were excluded: (1) patients infected with CRKP-BSI and/or CSKP-BSI before or within 2 days of hospital admission, (2) patients with polymicrobial BSIs, (3) patients with recurrent infections; (4) patients with incomplete medical records, and (5) patients infected without CSKP-BSI at the identical ward and timeframe as the CRKP-BSI cases.

2.2 Case definitions

Based on previous studies (Kaye et al., 2005; Ng et al., 2014), we designed the case-case-control study. This study comprised two case-control comparisons, in which inpatients infected with CRKP-BSI and CSKP-BSI were compared to a matched inpatients control group, respectively. The CSKP and control groups were matched to the CRKP group in the same ward as the source population during the same period (within 1 month) as the CRKP group. Patients in the CSKP and control groups were randomly selected when two or more cases were matched.

The CRKP group comprised patients with positive blood cultures, and isolates resistant to any carbapenem (imipenem, meropenem, and ertapenem) were considered resistant.

The CSKP group comprised patients with positive blood cultures and was defined as having K. pneumoniae susceptible to meropenem, imipenem, and ertapenem.

The matched control group comprised patients with positive blood cultures who have been confirmed bacteremia (except for K. pneumoniae infection). The control group included patients infected with Gram-positive bacteria, Gram-negative bacteria (except K. pneumoniae), and fungal bloodstream infections.

2.3 Antimicrobial susceptibility testing

Blood samples were cultured using the Bactec™ FX 50 systems (Becton Dickinson, Microbiology Systems, Cockeysville, MD, United States). All isolates were identified using matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (BioMérieux, France). Vitek2-compact automated microbiology system (BioMérieux, France) was used for antimicrobial susceptibility testing. Carbapenem (imipenem and/or meropenem) resistance was confirmed using the Kirby–Bauer (K–B) method (CLSI, 2023).The Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI-M100) document was used to interpret the antimicrobial susceptibility testing (CLSI, 2023). E. coli ATCC25922 and Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC27853 were used as control strains for antimicrobial susceptibility testing.

2.4 Data collection

We reviewed the medical records and collected patient information according to previous studies (Chen J. et al., 2022; Kong et al., 2024; Ng et al., 2014; Palacios-Baena et al., 2021; Stuever et al., 2022; Zhang et al., 2021). The epidemiology and clinical data of patients were collected, including the department, sex, age, age > 65 years, underlying diseases (respiratory system, liver, urinary system, circulatory system, digestive system, and central nervous diseases; diabetes mellitus, malignancies); antibiotics (3rd-generation cephalosporins, β-lactam inhibitor compounds, carbapenem, aminoglycosides, quinolones, tigecycline, and macrolides), and glucocorticoids, within 3 months before CRKP-BSI. Surgical history and invasive procedures (mechanical ventilation, central venous catheter, arterial, and urinary catheters, drainage, and gastric tubes), within 1 month before CRKP-BSI; mortality, related to hospitalization (hospital stays prior CRKP isolation, ICU stays within 3 months before a positive blood culture, length of hospital stays). Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) scores are used to calculate the severity of the disease within 24 h following the onset of BSI.

The clinical outcomes were defined as follows: 30-day mortality (within 30 days of the first positive blood culture), in-hospital mortality (death during hospitalization after the first positive blood culture), and length of hospital stays (duration from admission to hospital-to-hospital discharge).

2.5 Statistical analysis

Non-normally distributed continuous variables are presented as medians with interquartile ranges (IQRs) and were compared using the Mann–Whitney U-test. Categorical variables are presented as numbers and percentages, and were compared using the chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used for comparison among the three groups. Univariate analyses were performed for each variable, and those with a p < 0.05 were included in a multivariate logistic regression analysis. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05, and SPSS 26.0 and GraphPad Prism 10 were used for statistical analyses.

3 Results

3.1 Incidence and mortality of CRKP-BSI over the past 7 years

During the 7-year study period, only 105 patients met the inclusion criteria, resulting in 105 episodes of CRKP-BSI included in the analysis. Most patients infected with CRKP-BSI were admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) (48.6%, 51/105), followed by stays in general medical (38.1%, 40/105) and surgical (13.3%, 14/105) wards. The percentage of K. pneumoniae in the blood samples from 2017 to 2023 fluctuated from 12.3 to 15.9% (12.3% in 2017, 10.1% in 2018, 16.3% in 2019, 15.7% in 2020, 14.2% in 2021, 15.3% in 2022, and 15.9% in 2023). The percentages of CRKP-BSI in K. pneumoniae-BSI from 2017 to 2023 were 20.5, 14.6, 26.7, 20.3, 30.5, 21.5, and 31.1%, respectively, thus increasing from 20.5 to 31.1% (Figure 2A). In addition, the in-hospital mortality of patients with CRKP-BSI was 55.2%, which was higher than that of patients with CSKP-BSI (55.2 vs. 28.6%, p < 0.001). The in-hospital mortality of CRKP-BSI and CSKP-BSI increased from 37.5 and 25%, respectively, in 2017 to 69.2 and 42.3% in 023 (Figure 2A). The number and proportion of isolated cases of CRKP-BSI annually are shown in Figure 2B, most of the strains were isolated in 2019 and 2023.

FIGURE 2

Figure 2. (A) Trends in prevalence and mortality of Klebsiella pneumoniae bloodstream infections. (B) The number (black) and proportion (red) of CRKP-BSI strains isolated over the seven-year study period. KP, Klebsiella pneumoniae; CRKP, carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae; CSKP, carbapenem-susceptible Klebsiella pneumoniae; BSI, bloodstream infection.

3.2 Antimicrobial susceptibility of CRKP-BSI and CSKP-BSI

The antibiotic susceptibility patterns of CRKP-BSI and CSKP-BSI isolates are shown in Table 1. All CRKP-BSI isolates were resistant to cefuroxime, and ceftriaxone. The resistance rate of CRKP-BSI isolates to amoxicillin/clavulanic acid, cefoperazone/sulbactam, piperacillin/tazobactam, ceftazidime, cefepime, aztreonam, gentamicin, levofloxacin, ciprofloxacin was higher than 80%, whereas the resistance rate to colistin and tigecycline was low.

TABLE 1

Table 1. The antibiotic resistance of CRKP-BSI and CSKP-BSI groups.

3.3 The CRKP-BSI group compared to the control group

Descriptive statistics of the study groups are shown in Table 2. Differences among study groups were identified for prior hospital stays (χ² = 5.35, p = 0.005), ICU stays (χ² = 8.39, p < 0.001), and length of hospital stays (LOS) (χ² = 4.65, p = 0.01).

TABLE 2

Table 2. Demographic characteristics of 105 patients with CRKP-BSI, 105 patients with CSKP-BSI, and 105 control patients at a large tertiary-care hospital.

The results of the univariate analyses comparing the clinical characteristics of patients infected with CRKP-BSIs and control patients are listed in Table 3. The variables associated with CRKP-BSI were as follows: respiratory diseases (OR = 2.51; 95%CI, 1.34–4.70; p = 0.004), liver diseases (OR = 1.78; 95%CI, 1.03–3.08; p = 0.04), and malignancies (OR = 2.07; 95%CI, 1.06–4.05; p = 0.03); exposure to antibiotics, including 3rd-generation cephalosporins (OR = 1.80; 95%CI, 1.02–3.20; p = 0.04), β-lactam inhibitor compounds (OR = 2.24; 95%CI, 1.27–3.94; p = 0.005),carbapenems (OR = 6.93; 95%CI, 3.78–12.73; p < 0.001), quinolones (OR = 2.48; 95%CI, 1.28–4.80; p = 0.006), tigecycline (OR = 4.00; 95%CI, 2.01–7.95; p < 0.001), glycopeptides (OR = 5.42; 95%CI, 1.16–25.38; p = 0.02), and glucocorticoids (OR = 3.92; 95%CI, 2.15–7.15; p < 0.001), within 3 months before a positive blood culture; surgical history (OR = 2.51; 95%CI, 1.43–4.42; p = 0.001) and invasive procedures, including mechanical ventilation (OR = 2.99; 95%CI, 1.71–5.25; p < 0.001), central venous catheter insertion (OR = 3.95; 95%CI, 2.19–7.13; p < 0.001), urinary catheter insertion (OR = 2.50; 95%CI, 1.38–4.51; p = 0.002), drainage tube insertion (OR = 2.44; 95%CI, 1.24–4.79; p = 0.009), and gastric tube insertion (OR = 2.10; 95%CI, 1.21–3.66; p = 0.008), within 1 month before a positive blood culture; prior hospital stays (p < 0.001), and ICU stays (p = 0.005). Multivariate conditional logistic regression analysis indicated that liver diseases (OR = 2.37; 95%CI, 1.21–5.00; p = 0.02) and exposure to carbapenems (OR = 3.24; 95%CI, 1.51–6.95; p = 0.003), tigecycline (OR = 3.43; 95%CI, 1.40–8.41; p = 0.007) and glucocorticoids (OR = 4.64; 95%CI, 2.15–10.02; p < 0.001), within 3 months before a positive blood culture, were independent risk factors for CRKP-BSI (Table 4).

TABLE 3

Table 3. Univariate analyses of the risk factors for CRKP-BSI compared to the control group (N = 105).

TABLE 4

Table 4. Multivariate analyses of the independent risk factors for CRKP-BSI and CSKP-BSI compared to the control group.

3.4 The CSKP-BSI group compared to the control group

The clinical characteristics affecting the development of CSKP-BSI in patients were identified using univariate analyses and compared with those of control patients (Table 5). The factors determined to be more closely related with CSKP-BSI included liver diseases (OR = 2.01; 95%CI, 1.16–3.49; p = 0.01), malignancies (OR = 2.48; 95%CI, 1.28–4.80; p = 0.006); surgical history (OR = 2.24; 95%CI, 1.27–3.94; p = 0.005), and invasive procedures, including central venous catheter insertion (OR = 2.27; 95%CI, 1.30–3.95; p = 0.004), within 1 month before a positive blood culture. Multivariate conditional logistic regression analysis indicated that liver diseases (OR = 1.82; 95%CI, 1.03–3.22; p = 0.04), and malignancies (OR = 2.38; 95%CI, 1.20–4.75; p = 0.01) were independent risk factors for CSKP-BSI (Table 4).

TABLE 5

Table 5. Univariate analyses of the risk factors for CSKP-BSI compared to the control group (N = 105).

3.5 Clinical outcomes

Overall, the 30-day mortality of patients with CRKP-BSI was 30.5% (32/105), while that of CSKP-BSI patients was 18.1% (19/105), and that of the control group was 13.3% (14/105), The 30-day mortality was significantly higher in the CRKP-BSI group compared to both the CSKP-BSI group and the control group (p = 0.007). A significant difference was also observed in the length of hospital stays among the study groups (p = 0.01). The clinical outcomes of the three groups are listed in Table 6. The variables associated with 30-day mortality in the Cox hazard model were patient groups (p = 0.02), respiratory diseases (HR = 3.52; 95%CI, 1.37–9.06; p = 0.009); use of 3rd-generation cephalosporins (HR = 1.92; 95%CI, 1.10–3.33; p = 0.02); mechanical ventilation (HR = 2.14; 95%CI, 1.15–3.97; p = 0.02); central venous catheter insertion (HR = 2.85; 95%CI, 1.46–5.59; p = 0.002) and length of hospital stays (HR = 0.90; 95%CI, 0.88–0.92; p < 0.001). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed, and the results are shown in Figure 3.

TABLE 6

Table 6. Clinical outcomes comparison between CRKP-BSI, CSKP-BSI, and control groups.

FIGURE 3

Figure 3. Kaplan–Meier curves showing 30-day mortality for the CRKP-BSI group, CSKP-BSI group and control group (p = 0.007). A significant difference was observed between the CRKP-BSI group and the CSKP-BSI group (p = 0.04) as well as between the CRKP-BSI group and the control group (p = 0.004). However, there was no significant difference between the CSKP-BSI group and the control group (p = 0.37).

Fifty-eight patients (55.2%) in the CRKP-BSI group, 30 patients (28.6%) in the CSKP-BSI group, and 26 patients (24.8%) in the control group died during hospitalization, in-hospital mortality was higher in the CRKP-BSI group compared to both the CSKP-BSI group and the control group (p < 0.001). Univariate analyses comparing the clinical characteristics of patients with CRKP-BSI who survived or died are presented in Table 7. Univariate analysis indicated that arterial catheter use (OR = 3.76; 95%CI, 1.67–8.49; p = 0.001), and ICU stays (p = 0.006) were associated with in-hospital mortality. Multivariate conditional logistic regression analysis showed that arterial catheter placement within 1 month before a positive blood culture (OR = 3.76; 95%CI, 1.67–8.49; p = 0.001) was an independent risk factor for in-hospital mortality (Table 4).

TABLE 7

Table 7. Univariable analyses of in-hospital mortality in the CRKP-BSI group.

4 Discussion

This study provides important insights into the characteristics and outcomes of CRKP in BSIs. For studies on risk factors for CRKP infection, the selection of an appropriate control group is critical to generate correct conclusions. Several studies selected the CSKP group as the control group, which can introduce statistical selection bias. CSKP represents only a small proportion of nosocomial infections and may not be representative of all infections. In addition, certain antibiotics may inhibit or eliminate certain strains of CSKP, while not affecting CRKP, which is another important bias. Consequently, the frequency of antibiotic use in CSKP strains may decrease, indirectly amplifying the risk factors for CRKP (Ng et al., 2014). Alternatively, a few studies have only included patients who were not infected with CRKP as controls but did not distinguish between susceptible and resistant groups (Cronin et al., 2017; Giacobbe et al., 2017; Micozzi et al., 2017). However, the risk factors for KP infection cannot be analyzed in such a scenario. Therefore, we performed a case-case-control study that included matched control from inpatients to identify the risk factors for CRKP/CSKP infection and the 30-day mortality of CRKP, thereby guiding the prevention and appropriate hospital treatment strategies.

In our study, we determined that CRKP-BSI was primarily concentrated in the ICU, followed by the hematology and emergency departments in the general medical department. Nosocomial infections are readily acquired in the ICU due to airborne and contact transmission of CRKP in this confined environment (Jiao et al., 2015). The transmission of CRKP is facilitated in the ICU by frequent use of medical equipment and invasive procedures. Patients in the ICU have serious underlying diseases and may be treated with broad-spectrum antibiotics, which also contribute to the induction of CRKP-BSI. Notably, hematology patients present unique vulnerabilities that increase the risk of CRKP-BSI, including long-term hospitalization, use of high-grade antibiotics, and an impaired immune response (Chen J. et al., 2022; de Souza et al., 2024). Patients with various infectious diseases are often treated in the emergency department, where crowdedness with patients, heavy workload of medical staff, and inadequate implementation of infection control measures are common problems that may lead to cross-transmission of CRKP in the emergency department.

The findings of this study showed that antibiotic resistance was more pronounced in the CRKP-BSI group than that in the CSKP-BSI group. However, these strains remained relatively susceptible to colistin and tigecycline. Considering the above results and individual clinical conditions, combination therapy is recommended as the optimal treatment approach for CRKP-BSI.

The statistically significant factors identified in multivariate analyses of both the CRKP-BSI and CSKP-BSI groups were risk factors for K. pneumoniae-BSI. The factors that were statistically significant in the multivariate analysis of CRKP-BSI but not of CSKP-BSI were risk factors for CRKP-BSI. In contrast, factors that were statistically significant in the multivariate analysis of CSKP-BSI but not of CRKP-BSI were risk factors for CSKP-BSI (Kaye et al., 2005). We identified that exposure to antibiotics (carbapenems and tigecycline) and glucocorticoids were risk factors for CRKP-BSI. One risk factor, liver disease, was a risk factor for K. pneumoniae-BSI. Patients with liver diseases have altered enteric flora and impaired immune systems, which increase the risk of K. pneumoniae-BSI (Hsu et al., 2021; Lameirão Gomes et al., 2019). In addition, patients with liver diseases require invasive procedures for diagnosis and treatment, which can exacerbate the occurrence of nosocomial infections.

Consistent with the results of previous studies (Cao et al., 2022; Xiao et al., 2020), our study showed that prior carbapenem use was an independent risk factor for CRKP-BSI. Carbapenemase acquisition is the primary cause of carbapenem resistance and occurs in across diverse departments (Zhang et al., 2021). Han et al. showed that the most prevalent carbapenemase gene in CRKP in China is blaKPC-2, followed by blaNDM (Han et al., 2020), and carbapenem exposure may induce the emergence of resistance-conferring genes. In contrast to other studies, our study determined that tigecycline exposure was also a risk factor for CRKP-BSI, indicating that CRKP-BSI can be induced by carbapenem as well as by other drugs. A previous study suggested that overexpression of the AcrAB efflux pump, induced by activated MarA, plays an important role in the emergence of CRKP isolates (Park et al., 2020). The use of antibiotics within 3 months before a positive blood culture indicated that the patient may have had repeated infections and antibiotic exposure, thereby increasing the risk of antibiotic resistance development. Thus, there is a need to strengthen the management of antibiotics in inpatients. Treatment with high doses for appropriate durations is a better way to limit the risk of infection. Consistent with previous studies (Huang et al., 2023), we showed that glucocorticoids use is a risk factor for CRKP-BSI, possibly because patients with CRKP-BSI have serious underlying diseases and are treated with glucocorticoids. Second, the use of glucocorticoids destroys the intestinal microenvironment, kills susceptible strains, and promotes the overgrowth of drug-resistant strains, thereby promoting a shift from opportunistic pathogens to pathogenic bacteria. Therefore, more attention should be paid to the initial appropriate antibiotic therapy for patients with CRKP-BSI. In addition, strengthening antimicrobial stewardship programs and regular resistance surveillance is essential to avoid unnecessary antibiotic exposure.

When assessing the potential impact of CRKP-BSI on 30-day mortality, we determined that patient groups, respiratory diseases, use of 3rd-generation cephalosporins, mechanical ventilation, and central venous catheter insertion were independent risk factors for 30-day mortality. However, a shorter length of hospital stays was a protective factor against 30-day mortality. Various studies have reported that mortality in patients with CRKP-BSI ranged from 24 to 65%, and some studies have shown that CRKP infection is an independent risk factor for mortality (Cao et al., 2022; Chen J. et al., 2022; Li et al., 2020; Liu et al., 2019; Schwaber et al., 2008). Similarly, in our study, patients with CRKP-BSI exhibited higher mortality and longer hospital stays.

Our study showed that patients with nosocomial CRKP-BSI were often diagnosed with respiratory diseases, which has been reported in previous studies (Strich et al., 2020). Moreover, several studies have also shown that chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a risk factor for CRKP infection (Liu et al., 2012; Nouvenne et al., 2014; Salsano et al., 2016). Patients with respiratory diseases are more likely to be infected with or colonized by CRKP in the airway, and patients with respiratory diseases requiring mechanical ventilation or invasive procedures are susceptible to CRKP-BSI. Under the selective pressure of 3rd-generation cephalosporin use, susceptible strains are eliminated, thereby facilitating the survival of resistant strains. Mechanical ventilation and central venous catheter insertion were independent risk factors for 30-day mortality in patients with CRKP-BSI. The most likely reason for this is that invasive procedures can damage the mucosa and increase the incidence of CRKP-BSI because the majority of bacteria can pass through the mucosal barrier to the bloodstream (Li et al., 2020). A shorter LOS is a protective factor against 30-day mortality. Patients with a reduced LOS have a lower risk of CRKP infection due to decreased contact time with the hospital environment, medical staff, and other patients, which is consistent with the findings of previous studies (Correa et al., 2013; Gallagher et al., 2014). The longer the hospital stays, the greater the risk of infection from colonizing bacteria. Therefore, judicious use of 3rd-generation cephalosporins in antibiotic stewardship programs, reduction of invasive procedures, and prevention of CRKP-BSI are effective strategies to reduce 30-day mortality.

Not surprisingly, arterial catheterization was a risk factor for in-hospital mortality in patients with nosocomial CRKP-BSI, which is consistent with previous studies emphasizing the importance of aseptic operations in patient care, and that invasive procedures can damage the mucosa and increase the chance of CRKP entering the bloodstream (Wang et al., 2018). Maintaining aseptic technique is an important strategy for CRKP-BSI prevention.

Recently, an increasing number of studies have focused on active screening for CRKP to enable early detection, isolation, and intervention in high-risk departments and patients. The WHO and the US CDC recommend screening for CRE based on local epidemiological conditions (United States Department of Health and Human Services, 2015; World Health Organization, 2017). In our hospital, nosocomial CRKP-BSIs primarily occur in the ICU and in patients with specific risk factors, suggesting that higher-risk departments and patients should be actively screened for CRKP.

Therapeutic options for CRKP-BSI in our hospital include these based on monotherapy or, in combination, tigecycline, colistin or ceftazidime/avibactam. Outcomes of patients were not altered by different types of antimicrobial therapy in univariate analysis, which was consistent with previous studies (Xiao et al., 2018). This is mainly attributes to the optimal treatment option for CRKP infections is still not well established. The causes of death in patients with CRKP-BSI are complex. Clinicians should not only consider anti-infective treatment, but also consider the patient’s own conditions, including the patient’s underlying diseases and organ functions. The prompt identification of risk factors for mortality in patients infected with CRKP-BSI is essential for early prescription of adequate empirical antibiotic therapy, which was a key factor for mortality reduction.

The present study has several limitations. First, this was a single-center study with a small sample size. Therefore, it is imperative to conduct prospective, multicenter, large-sample clinical trials to validate our findings. Second, this was a retrospective cohort, and potential information and selection biases were unavoidable. Finally, the clinical microbiology laboratory of our hospital does not perform routine detection of carbapenemase production for CRKP. We cannot exclude the possibility that some carbapenemase-producing isolates were susceptible to carbapenems and may have been classified as CSKP in this study. We also could not assess whether any outbreaks occurred during the study period and whether different drug resistance mechanisms resulted in different clinical outcomes. Future studies should include molecular epidemiological investigations.

5 Conclusion

This study aimed to elucidate the predictors of CRKP-BSI and help clinicians better identify CRKP-BSI at an early stage. In our hospital, CRKP-BSI exhibited a focal distribution across specific departments, such as the ICU, hematology department, and emergency department, highlighting the need to implement interventions such as hand hygiene protocols and environmental disinfection measures to limit CRKP transmission. The identification of risk factors for CRKP-BSI infection and mortality are critical for preventing and controlling CRKP. Our results showed that liver disease is an independent risk factor for K. pneumoniae-BSI, and that exposure to antibiotics (carbapenems and tigecycline) and glucocorticoids are risk factors for CRKP-BSI. central venous catheter insertion and mechanical ventilation use were independently associated with 30-day mortality. Therefore, patients with CRKP-BSI, respiratory diseases, use of 3rd-generation cephalosporins, mechanical ventilation, central venous catheter insertion, and arterial catheter use are more likely to have a poor prognosis. Close attention should be paid to patients who have used carbapenem and tigecycline over an extended period. Moreover, outcomes of patients were not altered by different types of antimicrobial therapy, the prompt identification of risk factors for mortality was a key factor for mortality reduction. The rational use of antibiotics, reduction in the length of hospital stays and reducing the frequency and duration of invasive procedures are effective measures to reduce CRKP-BSI and 30-day or in-hospital mortality (Xiao et al., 2018; Yuan et al., 2020). These findings provide valuable insights for the development of anti-infective therapy, infection prevention and the control strategies for CRKP-BSIs.

Data availability statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.

Ethics statement

The studies involving humans were approved by the Ethical Committee of Tianjin Medical University General Hospital (No. IRB2024-YX-423-01). The studies were conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. Written informed consent for participation was not required from the participants or the participants’ legal guardians/next of kin in accordance with the national legislation and institutional requirements.

Author contributions

HK: Methodology, Software, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. YoL: Conceptualization, Writing – original draft. LY: Data curation, Investigation, Writing – original draft. QC: Formal Analysis, Investigation, Writing – review & editing. YaL: Data curation, Investigation, Writing – review & editing. ZH: Data curation, Methodology, Writing – original draft. XF: Supervision, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. YC: Methodology, Supervision, Writing – review & editing. ZD: Methodology, Supervision, Writing – review & editing.

Funding

The author(s) declare that financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article. This study was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant no. 82072212).

Acknowledgments

We thank all the patients who donated their biological samples and the medical staff involved in the treatment and care of the patients.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Generative AI statement

The authors declare that no Generative AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

Abe, R., Akeda, Y., Sakamoto, N., Takeuchi, D., Sugawara, Y., Yamamoto, N., et al. (2022). A nationwide plasmidome surveillance in thailand reveals a limited variety of New Delhi Metallo-β-Lactamase-producing carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae clones and spreading plasmids. J. Clin. Microbiol. 60:e01080-22. doi: 10.1128/jcm.01080-22

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Bonomo, R., Burd, E., Conly, J., Limbago, B., Poirel, L., Segre, J., et al. (2018). Carbapenemase-producing organisms: A global scourge. Clin. Infect. Dis. 66, 1290–1297.

Google Scholar

Calandra, T., and Cohen, J. (2005). The international sepsis forum consensus conference on definitions of infection in the intensive care unit. Crit. Care Med. 33, 1538–1548.

Google Scholar

Cao, Z., Yue, C., Kong, Q., Liu, Y., and Li, J. (2022). Risk factors for a hospital-acquired carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae bloodstream infection: A five-year retrospective study. Infect. Drug Resist. 15, 641–654. doi: 10.2147/IDR.S342103

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

CDC. (2019). Antibiotic Resistance Threats in the United States. Atlanta, GA: US Department of Health and Human Services, doi: 10.15620/cdc:82532

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Chen, J., Ma, H., Huang, X., Cui, Y., Peng, W., Zhu, F., et al. (2022). Risk factors and mortality of carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae bloodstream infection in a tertiary-care hospital in China: An eight-year retrospective study. Antimicrob. Resist. Infect. Control. 11:161. doi: 10.1186/s13756-022-01204-w

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Chen, Y., Huang, H., Peng, J., Weng, L., and Du, B. (2022). Efficacy and safety of ceftazidime-avibactam for the treatment of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales bloodstream infection: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Microbiol. Spectr. 10, e2603–e2621. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.02603-21

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

CHINET, (2023). The Drug Resistance rate of K. pneumoniae to Carbapenems is Changing by Year. Available online at: http://www.chinets.com/Data/GermYear (accessed September 14, 2024).

Google Scholar

CLSI (2023). Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing, M100-S33. Wayne: CLSI.

Google Scholar

Correa, L., Martino, M., Siqueira, I., Pasternak, J., Gales, A., Silva, C., et al. (2013). A hospital-based matched case–control study to identify clinical outcome and risk factors associated with carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae infection. BMC Infect. Dis. 13:80. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-13-80

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Cronin, K., Lorenzo, Y., Olenski, M., Bloch, A., Visvanathan, K., Waters, M., et al. (2017). Risk factors for KPC-producing Enterobacteriaceae acquisition and infection in a healthcare setting with possible local transmission: A case–control study. J. Hosp. Infect. 96, 111–115. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2017.02.010

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

David, S., Reuter, S., Harris, S., Glasner, C., Feltwell, T., Argimon, S., et al. (2019). Epidemic of carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae in Europe is driven by nosocomial spread. Nat. Microbiol. 4, 1919–1929. doi: 10.1038/s41564-019-0492-8

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

de Souza, I., Cappellano, P., Ferreira, D., Bergamasco, M., das Chagas Neto, T. C., Kerbauy, F. R., et al. (2024). Carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae bloodstream infections in haematological malignances and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: Clinical impact of combination therapy in a 10-year Brazilian cohort. PLoS One 19:e0297161. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0297161

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Evans, S., and Harris, A. (2017). Methods and issues in studies of CRE. Virulence 8, 453–459.

Google Scholar

Gallagher, J., Kuriakose, S., Haynes, K., and Axelrod, P. (2014). Case-case-control study of patients with carbapenem-resistant and third-generation-cephalosporin-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae bloodstream infections. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 58, 5732–5735. doi: 10.1128/AAC.03564-14

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Giacobbe, D., Del Bono, V., Bruzzi, P., Corcione, S., Giannella, M., Marchese, A., et al. (2017). Previous bloodstream infections due to other pathogens as predictors of carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae bacteraemia in colonized patients: Results from a retrospective multicentre study. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 36, 663–669. doi: 10.1007/s10096-016-2843-1

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Grundmann, H., Glasner, C., Albiger, B., Aanensen, D., Tomlinson, C., Andrasević, A., et al. (2017). Occurrence of carbapenemase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae and Escherichia coli in the European survey of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (EuSCAPE): A prospective, multinational study. Lancet Infect. Dis. 17, 153–163. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(16)30257-2

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Han, R., Shi, Q., Wu, S., Yin, D., Peng, M., Dong, D., et al. (2020). Dissemination of carbapenemases (KPC, NDM, OXA-48, IMP, and VIM) among carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae isolated from adult and children patients in China. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 10:314. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2020.00314

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Harris, A., Karchmer, T., Carmeli, Y., and Samore, M. (2001). Methodological principles of case-control studies that analyzed risk factors for antibiotic resistance: A systematic review. Clin. Infect. Dis. 32, 1055–1061. doi: 10.1086/319600

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Hsu, J., Chuang, Y., Wang, J., Chen, Y., and Hsieh, S. (2021). Healthcare-associated carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae bloodstream infections: Risk factors, mortality, and antimicrobial susceptibility, 2017–2019. J. Formosan Med. Assoc. 120, 1994–2002. doi: 10.1016/j.jfma.2021.04.014

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Huang, W., Qiao, F., Deng, Y., Zhu, S., Li, J., Zong, Z., et al. (2023). Analysis of risk factors associated with healthcare-associated carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae infection in a large general hospital: A case-case-control study. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 42, 529–541. doi: 10.1007/s10096-023-04578-w

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Jiao, Y., Qin, Y., Liu, J., Li, Q., Dong, Y., Shang, Y., et al. (2015). Risk factors for carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae infection/colonization and predictors of mortality: A retrospective study. Pathog. Glob. Health 109, 68–74. doi: 10.1179/2047773215Y.0000000004

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Kaier, K., and Frank, U. (2013). In search of useful methods for measuring health and economic consequences of antimicrobial resistance. Clin. Infect. Dis. 57, 1220–1222.

Google Scholar

Kaye, K., Harris, A., Samore, M., and Carmeli, Y. (2005). The case-case-control study design: Addressing the limitations of risk factor studies for antimicrobial resistance. Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol. 26, 346–351. doi: 10.1086/502550

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Kong, H., Hu, Z., Zhang, L., Chen, Q., Yang, L., Li, J., et al. (2024). Clinical risk factors and outcomes of carbapenem-resistant Escherichia coli nosocomial infections in a Chinese teaching hospital: A retrospective study from 2013 to 2020. Microbiol. Spectr. 12:e04228-23. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.04228-23

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Lameirão Gomes, C., Violante Silva, R., Carrola, P., and Presa, J. (2019). Bacterial infections in patients with liver cirrhosis in an internal medicine department. GE-Portuguese J. Gastroenterol. 26, 324–332. doi: 10.1159/000494568

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Li, Y., Li, J., Hu, T., Hu, J., Song, N., Zhang, Y., et al. (2020). Five-year change of prevalence and risk factors for infection and mortality of carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae bloodstream infection in a tertiary hospital in North China. Antimicrob. Resist. Infect. Control. 9, 1–14. doi: 10.1186/s13756-020-00728-3

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Liu, J., Wang, H., Huang, Z., Tao, X., Li, J., Hu, Y., et al. (2019). Risk factors and outcomes for carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae bacteremia in onco-hematological patients. J. Infect. Developing Countries 13, 357–364. doi: 10.3855/jidc.11189

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Liu, S., Chang, H., Chia, J., Kuo, A., Wu, T., and Lee, M. (2012). Outcomes and characteristics of ertapenem-nonsusceptible Klebsiella pneumoniae bacteremia at a university hospital in Northern Taiwan: A matched case-control study. J. Microbiol. Immunol. Infect. 45, 113–119. doi: 10.1016/j.jmii.2011.09.026

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Markwart, R., Saito, H., Harder, T., Tomczyk, S., Cassini, A., Fleischmann-Struzek, C., et al. (2020). Epidemiology and burden of sepsis acquired in hospitals and intensive care units: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Intensive Care Med. 46, 1536–1551. doi: 10.1007/s00134-020-06106-2

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Micozzi, A., Gentile, G., Minotti, C., Cartoni, C., Capria, S., Ballarò, D., et al. (2017). Carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae in high-risk haematological patients: Factors favouring spread, risk factors and outcome of carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae bacteremias. BMC Infect. Dis. 17:203. doi: 10.1186/s12879-017-2297-9

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Ng, T., Teng, C., Lye, D., and Apisarnthanarak, A. A. (2014). multicenter case-case control study for risk factors and outcomes of extensively drug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii bacteremia. Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol. 35, 49–55. doi: 10.1086/674387

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Nouvenne, A., Ticinesi, A., Lauretani, F., Maggio, M., Lippi, G., Guida, L., et al. (2014). Comorbidities and disease severity as risk factors for carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae colonization: Report of an experience in an internal medicine unit. PLoS One 9:e110001. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0110001

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Palacios-Baena, Z., Giannella, M., Manissero, D., Rodriguez-Bano, J., Viale, P., Lopes, S., et al. (2021). Risk factors for carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacterial infections: A systematic review. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 27, 228–235.

Google Scholar

Park, Y., Choi, Q., Kwon, G., and Koo, S. (2020). Molecular epidemiology and mechanisms of tigecycline resistance in carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates. J. Clin. Lab. Analys. 34:e23506. doi: 10.1002/jcla.23506

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Prestinaci, F., Pezzotti, P., and Pantosti, A. (2015). Antimicrobial resistance: A global multifaceted phenomenon. Pathog. Global Health 109, 309–318.

Google Scholar

Reyes, J., Aguilar, A., and Caicedo, A. (2019). Carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae: Microbiology key points for clinical practice. Int. J. General Med. 12, 437–446. doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S214305

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Salsano, A., Giacobbe, D., Sportelli, E., Olivieri, G., Brega, C., Di Biase, C., et al. (2016). Risk factors for infections due to carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae after open heart surgery. Interactive Cardiovasc. Thoracic Surg. 23, 762–768. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivw228

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Schwaber, M., Klarfeld-Lidji, S., Navon-Venezia, S., Schwartz, D., Leavitt, A., and Carmeli, Y. (2008). Predictors of carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae acquisition among hospitalized adults and effect of acquisition on mortality. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 52, 1028–1033. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01020-07

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Stewardson, A., Marimuthu, K., Sengupta, S., Allignol, A., El-Bouseary, M., Carvalho, M., et al. (2019). Effect of carbapenem resistance on outcomes of bloodstream infection caused by Enterobacteriaceae in low-income and middle-income countries (PANORAMA): A multinational prospective cohort study. Lancet Infect. Dis. 19, 601–610. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(18)30792-8

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Strich, J., Warner, S., Lai, Y., Demirkale, C., Powers, J., Danner, R., et al. (2020). Needs assessment for novel Gram-negative antibiotics in US hospitals: A retrospective cohort study. Lancet Infect. Dis. 20, 1172–1181.

Google Scholar

Stuever, D., Ferketich, A., Lee, J., Stevenson, K., and Wittum, T. (2022). Case-case-control study of risk factors for carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales infections among hospitalized patients. Antimicrob. Stewardsh. Healthc. Epidemiol. 2:e118. doi: 10.1017/ash.2022.244

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Tacconelli, E., Carrara, E., Savoldi, A., Harbarth, S., Mendelson, M., Monnet, D., et al. (2018). Discovery, research, and development of new antibiotics: The WHO priority list of antibiotic-resistant bacteria and tuberculosis. Lancet Infect. Dis. 18, 318–327. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(17)30753-3

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Temkin, E., Adler, A., Lerner, A., and Carmeli, Y. (2014). Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae: Biology, epidemiology, and management. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1323, 22–42. doi: 10.1111/nyas.12537

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Tzouvelekis, L., Markogiannakis, A., Psichogiou, M., Tassios, P., and Daikos, G. (2012). Carbapenemases in Klebsiella pneumoniae and other Enterobacteriaceae: An evolving crisis of global dimensions. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 25, 682–707. doi: 10.1128/CMR.05035-11

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

United States Department of Health and Human Services (2015). Facility Guidance for Control of Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE)—November 2015 Update CRE Toolkit. Atlanta, GA: United States Department of Health and Human Services.

Google Scholar

Wang, Z., Qin, R., Huang, L., and Sun, L. (2018). Risk factors for carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae infection and mortality of Klebsiella pneumoniae infection. Chin. Med. J. 131, 56–62. doi: 10.4103/0366-6999.221267

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

World Health Organization (2017). Guidelines for the Prevention and Control of Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae, Acinetobacter baumannii and Pseudomonas aeruginosa in Health Care Facilities. Geneva: World Health Organization.

Google Scholar

Xiao, T., Yu, W., Niu, T., Huang, C., and Xiao, Y. (2018). A retrospective, comparative analysis of risk factors and outcomes in carbapenem-susceptible and carbapenem-nonsusceptible Klebsiella pneumoniae bloodstream infections: Tigecycline significantly increases the mortality. Infect. Drug Resist. 11, 595–606. doi: 10.2147/IDR.S153246

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Xiao, T., Zhu, Y., Zhang, S., Wang, Y., Shen, P., Zhou, Y., et al. (2020). A retrospective analysis of risk factors and outcomes of carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae bacteremia in nontransplant patients. J. Infect. Dis. 221, S174–S183. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiz559

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Xu, L., Sun, X., and Ma, X. (2017). Systematic review and meta-analysis of mortality of patients infected with carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae. Ann. Clin. Microbiol. Antimicrob. 16, 1–12. doi: 10.1186/s12941-017-0191-3

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Yuan, Y., Wang, J., Yao, Z., Ma, B., Li, Y., Yan, W., et al. (2020). Risk factors for carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae bloodstream infections and outcomes. Infect. Drug Resist. 13, 207–215. doi: 10.2147/IDR.S223243

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhang, H., Guo, Z., Chai, Y., Fang, Y., Mu, X., Xiao, N., et al. (2021). Risk factors for and clinical outcomes of carbapenem-resistant klebsiella pneumoniae nosocomial infections: A retrospective study in a tertiary hospital in Beijing, China. Infect. Drug Resist. 14, 1393–1401. doi: 10.2147/IDR.S298530

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhu, W., Yuan, Z., and Zhou, H. (2020). Risk factors for carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae infection relative to two types of control patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Antimicrob. Resist. Infect. Control. 9, 1–13. doi: 10.1186/s13756-020-0686-0

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar