Abstract
Corn stover is rich in lignocellulose, which results in low digestibility. Steam explosion is a hydrothermal pretreatment widely used to improve the digestibility of plant-based materials by inducing cell wall disruption through the rapid release of pressure. However, the impact of steam explosion-treated corn stover on the growth performance of sheep consuming it remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of steam explosion and Lactobacillus buchneri inoculation on the nutritional value and rumen microbiota of corn stover. Corn stover was prepared with or without steam explosion and L. buchneri inoculation. Eighty sheep of similar body weight (47.62 ± 0.74 kg) were allocated into two groups and fed either untreated corn stover (CON, n = 40) or steam explosion-pretreated corn stover cocultured with L. buchneri (SEC, n = 40). The experiment lasted 60 days, and it included 10 days of adaptation and 50 days of feeding. Our results indicated that compared with the CON group, the final weight, average daily gain, and daily dry matter intake of the SEC group were significantly reduced (P < 0.05). Alpha-diversity analysis showed that the Chao1 index of the rumen microbial community tended to be lower (P < 0.1) in the SEC group. At the genus level, the SEC group had a higher (P < 0.05) relative abundance of Stylonychia, Paramecium, Treponema, Blepharisma, Neocallimastix, Stentor, Tetrahymena, Ichthyophthirius, and Pseudocohnilembus than the CON sheep. We identified the top 15 KEGG functional terms with distinct differences between the CON and SEC groups, with endocytosis being the only pathway enriched (P < 0.05) in the SEC group. Based on these findings, we speculated that, compared with the CON group, the consumption of corn stover pretreated with steam explosion and fermentation may have been associated with greater energy loss via the production of more methane and lower microbial activities, contributing to the low utilization and efficiency of this feedstuff. Before the widespread application of steam explosion to corn stover, there is a need to further optimize the production process, with particular attention paid to the proportion of corn stover in the diet.
1 Introduction
Corn stover is one of the most common crop residues, with an annual global yield of approximately 1.15 billion tons (). Although it is commonly discarded as waste, using it efficiently would be extremely beneficial for biofuel/livestock production. This would also ameliorate the land and air pollution risks currently associated with its disposal. However, the high lignocellulose content and high degree of lignification in mature corn stover hinder its efficient utilization (). Therefore, disrupting the recalcitrant structure of corn stover and developing an economical storage method are essential steps to ensure its year-round supply and efficient use.
Steam explosion technology has emerged as a promising method for pretreating food processing byproducts because of its high efficiency, environmental friendliness, and low cost (). Although it was originally applied in fields such as pulping and wood processing (), animal feed processing (), and bioenergy production (), recent studies have also suggested that steam explosion could reduce the antigenicity, β-conglycinin, and phytic acid content in soybean meal (), and change the ruminal fermentation of corn stover based on in vitro findings (). Steam explosion can degrade hemicellulose into soluble monosaccharides or oligosaccharides (). Under the process of Steam explosion, the content of neutral detergent fiber and hemicellulose can be reduced from 73.2 and 34.7 to 49.7 and 6.7, respectively (). Meanwhile, the morphological structure is broken, the accessibility of cellulose is increased (2.44, 2.83, 4.08-4.33 mg/g) and the content of acid detergent lignin is decreased (17.52%) (). This process effectively disrupts the cell walls of plant-based materials, enhancing the extraction and biological activity of their active components, which makes it a promising method for corn stover pretreatment.
However, existing research has primarily focused on the structural changes of straw induced by steam explosion technology, but the specific feed effects of steam-exploded straw remain unclear. There is also a need to further explore this technology’s acceptance by animals, its palatability, and its impact on the rumen, which is the primary site of digestion in ruminants. Specifically, although steam explosion changes the structure of lignocellulosic materials, their subsequent digestibility and utilization by animals remain unclear. This study was established to investigate the effects of consuming corn straw pretreated with steam explosion and fermentation on the growth performance of fattening sheep, such as their growth performance and serum parameters, along with rumen metagenomic sequencing results. We hope that the assessment of these factors will provide valuable insights into sustainable livestock feeding practices and promote the utilization of agricultural byproducts in animal nutrition.
2 Materials and methods
2.1 Experimental animals and diet
The animal experiment was approved by the Ethics Committee on the Use of Production Animals of the Inner Mongolia Academy of Agricultural & Animal Husbandry Science (Approval number: No.1 20231207).
This study was conducted between July 2023 and November 2023 at a sheep farm in Inner Mongolia, China. A total of 80 male Hei sheep, with a mean ± standard error (SE) body weight (BW) of 47.62 ± 0.74 kg and aged 6 months, were selected for the experiment. These sheep were randomly assigned to one of two groups with the following diets: untreated corn stover (CON, n = 40) and steam explosion-pretreated corn stover cocultured with Lactobacillus buchneri (SEC, n = 40). The steam explosion-pretreated corn stover was sourced from Inner Mongolia Modern Pasture Operation Technology Co., Ltd.
The sheep were kept in individual pens and provided with fresh water ad libitum. All sheep were fed a total mixed ration (TMR) twice daily (0700 and 1,600 h), as shown in Table 1. The experimental period was 60 days, with a 10-day period of adaptation to the experimental diets and a 50-day feeding period. The sheep were weighed on day 1 and day 60, before morning feeding, to calculate their average daily gain (ADG). Daily dry matter intake (DDMI) was determined by weighing each sheep’s daily feed supply and leftovers.
TABLE 1
| Items1, % | Dietary treatment | |
| Corn stover | Steam explosion-pretreated corn stover | |
| Components | ||
| Corn straw | 26 | 0 |
| Spray corn stover | 0 | 26 |
| Soybean meal | 5 | 5 |
| Cotton meal | 7 | 7 |
| Corn | 35 | 35 |
| Spouting corn husks | 6 | 6 |
| Corn germ meal | 16 | 16 |
| NaCl | 0.7 | 0.7 |
| Stone powder | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| NaHCO3 | 0.7 | 0.7 |
| Premix2 | 3 | 3 |
| Total | 100 | 100 |
| Chemical composition | ||
| Dry matter | 88.26 | 67.52 |
| Metabolizable energy, MJ kg1 DM | 12.10 | 9.47 |
| Crude protein | 14.19 | 15.41 |
| Neutral detergent fiber | 27.55 | 27.36 |
| Acid detergent fiber | 17.65 | 19.06 |
| Ether extract | 2.08 | 1.71 |
| Ash | 8.59 | 8.95 |
| Calcium | 0.85 | 0.83 |
| Phosphorus | 0.31 | 0.31 |
Nutrient composition of experimental diet (dry matter basis).
1Metabolizable energy is expressed in calculated values, while the others are measured values. DM: dry matter.
2The premix provided the following per kilogram of diet: vitamin A 90,000–200,000 IU, vitamin D3 30,000–80,000 IU, vitamin E ≥ 600 IU, Fe 0.3–15 mg (as ferrous sulfate monohydrate), Cu 0.2–0.6 mg (as copper sulfate), Zn 0.8–2.4 mg (as zinc sulfate monohydrate), Mn 6–100 mg (as manganese sulfate monohydrate), Se 5–10 mg (as sodium selenite), I 6–100 mg (as potassium iodide), Co 2–40 mg (as cobalt chloride), and NaCl 10%–40%.
3Metabolizable Energy (ME) Calculation Formula: Metabolizable Energy can be calculated using the following formula: ME (MJ/kgDM) = 0.016 × GE (MJ/kgDM) – 0.17 × CP (%) Where: GE is Gross Energy, in MJ/kg DM. CP is Crude Protein content, in% DM.
2.2 Blood and rumen sample collection
Six sheep were randomly selected from each experimental group to undergo sample collection. Blood samples (5 mL) were obtained from them on the 60th day of the feeding period, before the morning feeding, by jugular venipuncture, using coagulation-promoting tubes. The samples were then centrifuged at 3,000 × g for 20 min to extract the serum, which was subsequently divided into three aliquots and stored at −20°C for subsequent analysis.
For the rumen fluid sample collection, eight sheep from each group were randomly chosen. Approximately 50 mL of rumen fluid was collected via an oral stomach tube before the morning feeding on day 52 of the feeding period (). To prevent cross-contamination between samples, the oral stomach tube was thoroughly cleaned with fresh warm water between each collection. All samples were immediately placed in liquid nitrogen and subsequently stored at −80°C for further analysis.
2.3 Serum biochemical analysis
All blood parameters were analyzed using commercial kits, following the manufacturer’s instructions (Grace Biotechnology, Suzhou, China). Serum β-hydroxybutyrate (BHBA) levels were measured using ELISA test kits (Cat. No. ZC8116602), while the absorbance (OD) was measured at 450 nm. The levels of superoxide dismutase (SOD, Cat. No. 702121), immunoglobulin A (IgA, Cat. No. 70275), immunoglobulin G (IgG, Cat. No. 70276), immunoglobulin M (IgM, Cat. No. 70277), glucose (GLU, Cat. No. 70229), total protein (TP, Cat. No. 70212), and albumin (ALB, kit 70213) were determined using commercially available kits. Serum diamine oxidase (DAO) activity was measured using a commercially available DAO kit (G0134W), and the OD was measured at 510 nm. Serum glutathione peroxidase (GSH-Px) levels were measured using a commercially available GSH-Px kit (Cat. No. G0204W), and the OD was measured at 412 nm. Serum lipopolysaccharide (LPS) was measured using a commercially available LPS kit (Cat. No. G0902W), and the OD was measured at 405 nm. Serum malondialdehyde (MDA) levels were determined using a commercially available MDA kit (Cat. No. G0109W), and the OD was measured at 532 nm and 600 nm. Serum non-esterified fatty acid (NEFA) concentrations were measured using a commercially available NEFA kit (Cat. No. G0927W48), and the OD was measured at 546 nm. Finally, serum total antioxidant capacity (T-AOC) was measured using a commercially available T-AOC kit (Cat. No. G0142W), and the OD was measured at 414 nm.
2.4 Metagenomic sequencing analysis
Total genomic DNA was extracted from rumen fluid samples using the PSP Spin Stool DNA Plus Kit (Invitek, Berlin, Germany), following the manufacturer’s instructions. The concentration and purity of the extracted DNA were determined using TBS-380 and NanoDrop2000, respectively. The quality of the DNA extract was checked on a 1% agarose gel.
Each DNA extract was fragmented to an average size of approximately 350 bp using Covaris M220 (Gene Company Limited, Hong Kong, China) for paired-end library construction. The paired-end library was constructed using NEXTFLEX® Rapid DNA-Seq (Bioo Scientific, Austin, TX, United States). Adapters containing the full complement of sequencing primer hybridization sites were ligated to the blunt ends of the fragments. Paired-end sequencing was performed on Illumina NovaSeq (Illumina Inc., San Diego, CA, United States) at Majorbio Bio-Pharm Technology Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China), using NovaSeq 6000 S4 Reagent Kit v1.5 (300 cycles), following the manufacturer’s instructions (see online instructions on the Illumina website: www.illumina.com).
2.5 Bioinformatic analysis
The data were analyzed on the free online platform Majorbio Cloud Platform.1 Paired-end Illumina reads were trimmed of adaptors, and low-quality reads (length < 50 bp or quality score < 20) were removed using fastp (; version 0.20.0).2 Metagenomic data were assembled using MEGAHIT (; version 1.1.2),3 which uses succinct de Bruijn graphs. Contigs with lengths ≥ 300 bp were selected as the final assembly result, and the contigs were then used for further gene prediction and annotation.
Open reading frames (ORFs) were predicted from each assembled contig using Prodigal (version 2.6.3; )/MetaGene ().4 The predicted ORFs with length ≥ 100 bp were retrieved and translated into amino acid sequences using the NCBI translation table.5
Representative sequences from the non-redundant gene catalog were aligned to the NR database with an e-value cut-off of 1e–5 using Diamond (; version 0.8.35)6 for annotation. KEGG annotation was performed using Diamond against the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes database7 with an e-value cut-off of 1e5. Principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) was performed based on Bray–Curtis dissimilarity matrices at the genus level. To compare the general microbial functional profiles among different groups, PCoA was conducted based on the relative abundance of KEGG pathways. Alpha-diversity values were calculated using Chao1 and Shannon indices.
2.6 Statistical analysis
The t-test was used to analyze the significance of differences in growth performance, serum biochemical parameters, and rumen microbial community at the phylum level using SPSS software (version 26.0). Rumen metagenomic data were analyzed using the Majorbio Cloud Platform (; see text footnote 1). The significance of differences between groups was tested using Anosim. The alpha diversity, relative abundance of rumen genera, and KEGG pathways were compared between the two groups using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test, with a false discovery rate-adjusted P-value of < 0.05 being considered to reflect a significant difference (only the top 15 genera/pathways are displayed). Correlations between datasets were calculated using Spearman’s correlation coefficients.
3 Results
3.1 Growth performance and serum biochemical parameters
Table 2 shows the growth performance of the sheep. There was no difference in initial weight between the two groups (P > 0.05), but the SEC group exhibited significant decreases in final weight, ADG, and DDMI compared with the CON group (P < 0.05).
TABLE 2
| Items | Corn stover | Steam explosion- pretreated corn stover | SEM | P-value |
| Initial weight (kg) | 48.58 | 48.66 | 0.7385 | 0.913 |
| Final weight (kg) | 61.01 | 57.91 | 1.1397 | 0.008 |
| Average daily gain (g) | 223.06 | 153.89 | 10.544 | <0.001 |
| Daily dry matter intake (kg) | 2.10 | 1.31 | 0.089 | <0.001 |
Effects of different types of corn stover on the growth performance of sheep.
Table 3 shows the effects of the experimental diet on the serum parameters. The results revealed that compared to the SEC group, the CON group had higher concentrations of ALB and TP (both P < 0.05), but there were no marked differences in the other parameters between the treatments (P > 0.05).
TABLE 3
| Items | Corn stover | Steam explosion- pretreated corn stover | SEM | P-value |
| Immunoglobulin (mg/mL) | ||||
| Immunoglobulin A | 10.10 | 11.08 | 1.645 | 0.565 |
| Immunoglobulin G | 18.80 | 18.33 | 2.108 | 0.830 |
| Immunoglobulin M | 150.00 | 142.50 | 12.340 | 0.558 |
| Metabolism | ||||
| Glucose (mmol/L) | 6.06 | 5.38 | 1.283 | 0.606 |
| β-Hydroxybutyrate (μmol/L) | 14.87 | 15.37 | 1.247 | 0.697 |
| Non-esterified fatty acid (mmol/L) | 0.51 | 0.45 | 0.214 | 0.780 |
| Total protein (g/L) | 131.70 | 122.50 | 4.000 | 0.047 |
| Albumin (g/L) | 67.80 | 58.75 | 2.453 | 0.005 |
| Antioxidant indicator | ||||
| Superoxide dismutase | 420.00 | 377.50 | 24.420 | 0.116 |
| Glutathione peroxidase | 150.48 | 149.59 | 2.201 | 0.696 |
| Total antioxidant capacity | 0.07 | 0.07 | 0.012 | 0.705 |
| Malondialdehyde | 0.24 | 0.42 | 0.219 | 0.127 |
| Intestinal permeability indicator | ||||
| Lipopolysaccharide | 267.88 | 296.39 | 34.854 | 0.434 |
| Diamine oxidase | 1.63 | 1.42 | 0537 | 0.696 |
Effects of different types of corn stover on serum biochemical parameters of sheep.
3.2 Difference in rumen microbial diversity indices
Metagenomic sequencing generated a mean of 92,591,235 reads per sample. After quality control and removal of host genes, a mean of 90,824,781 reads per sample was retained. After de novo assembly, a total of 11,044,467 contigs were generated, with 690,279 contigs per sample.
Alpha-diversity analysis showed that the Chao1 index of the rumen microbial community tended to be lower (P < 0.1) in the SEC group (Figure 1A). Meanwhile, the Shannon index (Figure 1B) in the rumen was similar (P > 0.05) between the CON and SEC groups. Beta-diversity analysis and Bray–Curtis distance-based PCoA revealed that the microbial composition in the rumen was different between the two groups (Figure 1C).
FIGURE 1
3.3 Changes in rumen microbial composition and its correlation with growth performance
At the phylum level, the SEC group had a higher (P < 0.05) relative abundance of Ciliophora and a lower (P < 0.05) relative abundance of Firmicutes and Candidatus Saccharibacteria than the CON group (Table 4).
TABLE 4
| Items | Corn stover | Steam explosion- pretreated corn stover | SEM | P-value |
| Firmicutes | 47.89 | 25.31 | 4.820 | <0.001 |
| Bacteroidota | 17.32 | 11.80 | 3.618 | 0.149 |
| Actinobacteria | 2.43 | 1.08 | 0.675 | 0.065 |
| Ciliophora | 0.51 | 1.84 | 0.268 | <0.001 |
| Proteobacteria | 1.28 | 0.87 | 0.256 | 0.131 |
| Spirochetes | 0.69 | 1.06 | 0.177 | 0.054 |
| Euryarchaeota | 0.72 | 0.62 | 0.233 | 0.662 |
| Candidatus Saccharibacteria | 1.18 | 0.08 | 0.246 | 0.003 |
Effects of different types of corn stover on the rumen microbial community of sheep at the phylum level (relative abundance > 1%).
Microbial genera were also compared between the rumen microbiomes of the two groups (Figure 2A). At the genus level, the SEC group had a higher (P < 0.05) relative abundances of Stylonychia, Paramecium, Treponema, Blepharisma, Neocallimastix, Stentor, Tetrahymena, Ichthyophthirius, and Pseudocohnilembus than the CON sheep. Meanwhile, compared with the levels in the CON group, the relative abundance of Eubacterium, Clostridium, Solobacterium, Saccharofermentans, Butyrivibrio, and Methanosphaera were reduced (P < 0.05) in the SEC group.
FIGURE 2
To investigate the effect of the different genera abundance in the rumen on host growth, an analysis of correlations between biomarkers exhibiting significant differences between groups (TP, ALB, FW, and ADG) and microbial biomarkers was conducted, as illustrated in Figure 2B. The results showed that the final weight of the experimental sheep was negatively (P < 0.05) correlated with the relative abundance of Tetrahymena. Meanwhile, the concentration of serum TP was negatively (P < 0.05) correlated with the relative abundance of Treponema. Finally, the level of serum ALB was positively (P < 0.05) correlated with the relative abundance of Clostridium, Eubacterium, and Butyrivibrio.
3.4 Profiling of the functional capacity of the rumen microbiota based on metagenomic sequencing
We further investigated the KEGG pathways associated with the microbiota in the rumen of sheep upon their consumption of the pretreated or untreated corn stover. In Figure 3, we present the top 15 KEGG functional terms (KEGG pathway level 3), showing differences in enrichment between the CON and SEC groups. Only endocytosis was enriched (P < 0.05) in the SEC group, while the other 14 pathways (metabolic pathways, biosynthesis of secondary metabolites, microbial metabolism in diverse environments, biosynthesis of cofactors, ribosome, ABC transporters, carbon metabolism, purine metabolism, nucleotide metabolism, pyrimidine metabolism, starch and sucrose metabolism, two-component system, and amino sugar and nucleotide, and sugar metabolism) were enriched (P < 0.05) in the CON group. PCoA plots based on the Bray–Curtis distance metric revealed the differences in KEGG pathways between samples from the two dietary treatments (P < 0.05).
FIGURE 3
3.5 Co-occurrence analysis among rumen bacteria, archaea, and fungi
Since rumen microbes work synergistically to perform various metabolic activities, we sought to determine the associative interactions between fungal, archaeal, and bacterial genera using co-occurrence analysis based on the top 50 genera with 47 nodes. Figure 4 presents the associations for the different treatments. To identify significant changes in the structure of the co-occurrence networks, we compared the node degree, which reflects the degree of connectivity, between the treatment groups, with only the nodes exhibiting significant correlations being presented. According to degree centrality, closeness centrality, and betweenness centrality, unclassified Alphaproteobacteria, Sarcina, Anaeromyces, and unclassified Oscillospiraceae were the core genera.
FIGURE 4
4 Discussion
This study was conducted to determine the impact of steam explosion and fermentation pretreatment of corn stover on the rumen microbial community and the growth performance of sheep that subsequently consumed it. A previous study demonstrated that the treatment of plant material with a combination of steam explosion and microbial degradation can overcome the drawbacks of conventional microbial pretreatment technology, and can facilitate the subsequent high-value conversion of lignocellulose (). However, the results of our study indicated that compared with the CON group, the sheep in the SEM group had lower growth performance (Table 2). Thus, our results do not support our hypothesis that the combination of steam explosion processing and fermentation treatment would promote the utilization of corn stover as sheep feed.
Many studies have demonstrated that steam explosion processing of corn stover leads to significant structural changes, such as the shortening of cellulose polymers, increased porosity of lignocellulose, and enhanced saccharification efficiency through enzymatic hydrolysis (). However, in the present study (Tables 2, 3), pretreating corn stover with steam explosion and microbial degradation unexpectedly reduced the DDMI and growth performance of sheep, while also decreasing the TP and ALB concentrations in their serum. A potential explanation for these findings is that steam explosion treatment may alter the structural properties of bioactive components in plant-based materials, which may, in turn, affect their functions. Specifically, steam explosion can reduce particle size (), increase surface area, and create larger cavities and gaps between plant cells () These structural changes may influence the bioavailability and digestibility of proteins, potentially reducing their nutritional value. Moreover, excessive steam explosion reduced the biological activity of the active components in plant materials. For instance, found that excessive steam explosion reduced the oil-holding capacity of grape pomace. In our study, sheep fed corn stover pretreated with steam explosion and fermentation had lower serum levels of TP and ALB, which are generally considered to be indicators of protein synthesis and metabolism in ruminants (). These lower levels suggest that protein synthesis and absorption may have been impaired in this group (). Thus, it is suggested that steam explosion processing would lower the nutritional value of protein in lignocellulosic biomass, consistent with the findings of a previous study on typical crop byproducts (). This reduction in protein quality could be attributed to protein degradation and the Maillard reaction, both of which are induced by excessive steam explosion, leading to a decrease in crude protein content and a loss of nitrogenous nutrients (). Thus, steam explosion can lower the utilization of nitrogen content by animals, which would ultimately reduce their growth performance. Before the application of steam explosion technology, more animal studies should be conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of steam-exploded corn stover on animals.
Rumen microbiota has been demonstrated to be critical to host health by providing metabolic products, maintaining metabolic function, ensuring proper development of the immune system, and defending against pathogens (; ). Microbial diversity is vital for the maintenance of microbial functions in the host (); high microbial diversity stabilizes the community structure and promotes its resistance to fluctuations in the environment (). This explains the significant associations of rumen microorganisms with host performance in the current study. This is supported by previous studies showing a difference in microbial diversity between steers with efficient or inefficient use of feed (higher alpha diversity was observed in the efficient group; (), and showing that a more diverse rumen microbial community can promote the use of high-fiber herbage in yaks (). Research has also revealed that the diversity of human intestinal microbiota improves the efficiency of dietary fiber fermentation (), and reflects better health and strong metabolic capacity (). Meanwhile, in our study, the rumen microbial diversity in the SEC group was lower than that in the CON group. This may be explained by various toxins being generated during steam explosion processing, which may impede microbial growth or enzymatic hydrolysis (). Thus, we speculate that a failure to accurately control the strength and uniformity of steam explosion treatment may produce compounds that adversely affect microbiota composition, abundance, and reproduction.
Diet is considered to be the most important factor determining microbial composition (). The microbiome plays a critical role in providing nutrition to host ruminants, thereby influencing their performance (). Previous research has shown that the genus Eubacterium, as symbiotic bacteria, may play a vital role in feed digestion () and residual feed intake () in cattle, with it being able to regulate the micro-ecological balance by producing short-chain fatty acids (). Meanwhile, both Eubacterium and Methanosphaera have been negatively associated with methane production by depriving methanogens of hydrogen for methanogenesis, resulting in less CH4 production per unit of carbon (). In the present study (Figure 2A), the genera Eubacterium and Methanosphaera were distinct signature taxa in the rumen of the CON group, suggesting that they contribute to CH4 reduction, thereby reducing the loss of energy in the activity of the microbial community, and in turn, improving the utilization of feed. Meanwhile, the genus Clostridium, which is associated with cellulose degradation () and nitrogen fixation (), was one of the distinct signature taxa in the rumen of the CON group. In contrast, several genera belonging to the phylum Ciliophora (Ichthyphthirius, Stentor, Stylonychia, Tetrahymena, Pseudocohnilembus, and Paramecium) and the genus Neocallimastix, which showed positive correlations with methane were significantly more abundant in the SEC group (). Moreover, a previous study demonstrated that, in cows with inefficient feed utilization, rumen metabolism shifted toward waste products such as methane, as evidenced by the specific enrichment of methane-related species and the increase in methane production (). Ruminants emit enteric CH4 as a byproduct of feed degradation and fermentation processes, which is mainly exhaled/eructated and not retained by the host. The loss of energy associated with the production of methane, which is estimated to vary between 2 and 12% of gross energy consumption, is metabolically undesirable as this energy could otherwise be used in beneficial ways (). An in vitro study also demonstrated that, because the improvement of fermentation efficiency produced more fermentation products, more methane was produced to remove metabolic hydrogen and keep the H2 partial pressure low (). Thus, we speculated that the application of steam explosion and fermentation pretreatment may make corn stover more easily degradable, but it may also change the ruminal microbial community, lower the population and reproduction of several microbial species, and increase methane-related species, thus reducing the efficiency of feed utilization. Our results suggest that the effects of this pretreatment combination on the nutritional composition, functional components, and physicochemical properties of plant-based raw materials for ruminant consumption need to be further investigated before it can be widely applied. To address the negative effects observed in the SEC group, further research should explore potential strategies to mitigate these effects. For instance, adjusting the fermentation process by increasing the pressure, as demonstrated by and , may be a beneficial strategy to improve the utilization efficiency of the feed (). Additionally, optimizing the proportion of steam-exploded corn stover in the diet, combined with the use of alternative microbiota, such as cellulase and lactic acid bacteria, has been shown to enhance the degradation of lignocellulosic material and improve fermentation efficiency (; ) could be considered potential solutions to enhance the utilization efficiency of the feed. These strategies may help improve microbial activity and fermentation efficiency, ultimately leading to better feed conversion and growth performance in ruminants. Future studies will focus on evaluating these approaches to determine their effectiveness in improving the nutritional value of steam-exploded corn stover and mitigating the observed negative effects.
In addition, the results of the KEGG pathway analysis indicated that the different types of corn stover significantly impacted the gene functional profiles in the sheep rumen microbiome (Figure 3). Notably, in the rumen microbiome of sheep fed the untreated corn stover, ABC transporters were the most expressed pathway in membrane transport, which directly participate in ATP production. These transporters also act as a barrier to protect ruminants from the invasion of toxic substances into the stomach (). The lower expression of ABC transporters in the SEC group indicates that less ATP may be produced in this group. The decrease in the relative abundance of the major microbial phyla and the lower Chao1 index (indicating lower microbial diversity) in the SEC group could explain the decrease in microbial activities in the rumen. Although we identified several specific taxa and KEGG pathways associated with the consumption of corn stover after its processing by steam explosion and fermentation in combination, the mechanisms behind these changes and their impact on rumen activity remain unclear (Figure 4). Although our findings provide important insights, the application of steam explosion and fermentation pretreatment to corn stover requires the need for further study such as, for example, a focus on animal utilization, before this approach can be widely applied.
5 Conclusion
Our results demonstrated that feeding sheep corn stover pretreated by steam explosion and fermentation can disrupt the balance of their rumen microbiota. The diversity and relative abundance of taxa associated with lower methane production were significantly reduced in the SEC group. We hypothesized that, compared to the CON group, sheep in the SEC group may have experienced greater energy loss due to increased methane production and less active microbial populations, leading to inefficient feed utilization. Methane production represents a loss of energy that could otherwise be used for growth and metabolic processes. Furthermore, the reduced microbial diversity observed in the SEC group likely contributed to decreased fermentation efficiency, further reducing energy availability. These factors could explain the reduced feed intake and lower microbial diversity, ultimately resulting in poorer growth performance in the SEC group. However, these hypotheses are speculative and require further validation. Future studies should focus on evaluating the digestibility and bioavailability of both untreated and steam-exploded corn stover to gain a deeper understanding of its nutritional impact. Additionally, exploring rumen fermentation parameters will offer valuable insight into the broader implications of steam explosion processing, especially in terms of energy loss and nitrogen utilization in ruminants. In addition, further optimization of the production process, with particular attention paid to the proportion of corn stover in the diet, is needed before the widespread application of steam explosion to corn stover.
Statements
Data availability statement
The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. The names of the repository/repositories and accession number(s) can be found in the article/supplementary material.
Ethics statement
The animal study was approved by Ethics Committee on the Use of Production Animals at the Inner Mongolia Academy of Agricultural & Animal Husbandry Science. The study was conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. Written informed consent was obtained from the owners for the participation of their animals in this study.
Author contributions
YW: Writing – review & editing. XY: Methodology, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Conceptualization. KH: Writing – original draft. CW: Writing – original draft. WWe: Writing – original draft, Investigation. YL: Writing – original draft. SG: Writing – original draft, Investigation. ZJ: Writing – original draft, Investigation. WWa: Writing – original draft, Investigation. YX: Methodology, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Conceptualization. CL: Writing – review & editing.
Funding
The author(s) declare that financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article. This work received funding from the China Agriculture Research System (CARS-38), Major projects in agricultural biological breeding (2022ZD040130204), Hebei Province Post Expert Project of Sheep Industry Technology System Innovative Team (HBCT2023200201), Doctoral Startup Fund of Hebei Normal University of Science and Technology (2025YB011), Science and Technology Project of Hebei Education Department (QN2022165), and Special Project for Basic Scientific Research of Provincial Universities (2022JK07). The funding bodies played no role in the design of the study; the collection, analysis, and interpretation of the data; or the writing of the manuscript.
Acknowledgments
We thank Tom Buckle of Scribendi (www.scribendi.com) for editing a draft of this manuscript.
Conflict of interest
The author declares that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Generative AI statement
The authors declare that no Generative AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Footnotes
2.^https://github.com/OpenGene/fastp
3.^https://github.com/voutcn/megahit
4.^http://metagene.cb.k.u-tokyo.ac.jp/
5.^http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Taxonomy/taxonomyhome.html/index.cgi?chapter=tgencodes#SG1
References
1
BuchfinkB.XieC.HusonD. (2015). Fast and sensitive protein alignment using diamond.Nat. Methods1259–60. 10.1038/nmeth.3176
2
ChenS.ZhouY.ChenY.GuJ. (2018). Fastp: An ultra-fast all-in-one Fastq preprocessor.Bioinformatics34i884–i890. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty560
3
ChengA.HouC.SunJ.WanF. (2020). Effect of steam explosion on phenolic compounds and antioxidant capacity in adzuki beans.J. Sci. Food Agric.1004495–4503. 10.1002/jsfa.10490
4
ClarkeS.MurphyE.O’SullivanO.LuceyA.HumphreysM.HoganA.et al (2014). Exercise and associated dietary extremes impact on gut microbial diversity.Gut631913–1920. 10.1136/gutjnl-2013-306541
5
CunhaC.MarcondesM.VelosoC.MantovaniH.PereiraL.TomichT.et al (2019). Compositional and structural dynamics of the ruminal microbiota in dairy heifers and its relationship to methane production.J. Sci. Food Agric.99210–218. 10.1002/jsfa.9162
6
DadiT.VahjenW.ZentekJ.MelzigM.GranicaS.PiwowarskiJ. (2020). Lythrum Salicaria L. herb and gut microbiota of healthy post-weaning piglets. focus on prebiotic properties and formation of postbiotic metabolites in ex vivo cultures.J. Ethnopharmacol.261:113073. 10.1016/j.jep.2020.113073
7
FanQ.WanapatM.YanT.HouF. (2020). Altitude influences microbial diversity and herbage fermentation in the rumen of yaks.BMC Microbiol.20:370. 10.1186/s12866-020-02054-5
8
FAOSTAT (2021). Agricultural Production.Rome: FAOSTAT.
9
HamanaK.ItohT.SakamotoM.HayashiH. (2012). Covalently linked polyamines in the cell wall peptidoglycan of the anaerobes belonging to the order Selenomonadales.J. Gen. Appl. Microbiol.58339–347. 10.2323/jgam.58.339
10
HanC.ShiC.LiuL.HanJ.YangQ.WangY.et al (2024). Majorbio cloud 2024: Update single-cell and multiomics workflows.Imeta3:e217. 10.1002/imt2.217
11
HeL.HuangY.ShiL.ZhouZ.WuH. (2022). Steam explosion processing intensifies the nutritional values of most crop byproducts: Morphological structure, carbohydrate-protein fractions, and rumen fermentation profile.Front. Nutr.9:979609. 10.3389/fnut.2022.979609
12
Hernandez-SanabriaE.GoonewardeneL.WangZ.DurunnaO.MooreS.GuanL. (2012). Impact of feed efficiency and diet on adaptive variations in the bacterial community in the rumen fluid of cattle.Appl. Environ. Microbiol.781203–1214. 10.1128/aem.05114-11
13
HoangA.NguyenX.DuongX.AğbulutÜLenC.NguyenP. Q. P.et al (2023). Steam explosion as sustainable biomass pretreatment technique for biofuel production: Characteristics and challenges.Bioresour. Technol.385:129398. 10.1016/j.biortech.2023.129398
14
HuangS.JiS.SuenG.WangF.LiS. (2021). The rumen bacterial community in dairy cows is correlated to production traits during freshening period.Front. Microbiol.12:630605. 10.3389/fmicb.2021.630605
15
HuwsS.CreeveyC.OyamaL.MizrahiI.DenmanS.PopovaM.et al (2018). Addressing global ruminant agricultural challenges through understanding the rumen microbiome: Past, present, and future.Front. Microbiol.9:2161. 10.3389/fmicb.2018.02161
16
HyattD.ChenG.LocascioP.LandM.LarimerF.HauserL. (2010). Prodigal: Prokaryotic gene recognition and translation initiation site identification.BMC Bioinformatics11:119. 10.1186/1471-2105-11-119
17
KimJ.IngaleS.HosseindoustA.LeeS.LeeJ.ChaeB. (2017). Effects of mannan level and B-mannanase supplementation on growth performance, apparent total tract digestibility and blood metabolites of growing pigs.Animal11202–208. 10.1017/s1751731116001385
18
KongF.ZengQ.LiY.GuoX. (2022). Effect of steam explosion on structural characteristics of B-conglycinin and morphology, chemical compositions of soybean meal.Front. Nutr.9:896664. 10.3389/fnut.2022.896664
19
LiD.LiuC.LuoR.SadakaneK.LamT. (2015). Megahit: An ultra-fast single-node solution for large and complex metagenomics assembly via succinct de bruijn graph.Bioinformatics311674–1676. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv033
20
LiF.HitchT.ChenY.CreeveyC.GuanL. (2019). Comparative metagenomic and metatranscriptomic analyses reveal the breed effect on the rumen microbiome and its associations with feed efficiency in beef cattle.Microbiome7:6. 10.1186/s40168-019-0618-5
21
LiH.QuJ.LiT.WirthS.ZhangY.ZhaoX.et al (2018). Diet simplification selects for high gut microbial diversity and strong fermenting ability in high-altitude pikas.Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol.1026739–6751. 10.1007/s00253-018-9097-z
22
LiH.ZhouR.ZhuJ.HuangX.QuJ. (2019). Environmental filtering increases with elevation for the assembly of gut microbiota in wild pikas.Microb. Biotechnol.12976–992. 10.1111/1751-7915.13450
23
LiuC.QuY.GuoP.XuC.MaY.LuoH. (2018). Effects of dietary supplementation with alfalfa (Medicago Sativa L.) saponins on lamb growth performance, nutrient digestibility, and plasma parameters.Animal Feed Sci. Technol.23698–106. 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2017.12.006
24
LozuponeC.StombaughJ.GordonJ.JanssonJ.KnightR. (2012). Diversity, stability and resilience of the human gut microbiota.Nature489220–230. 10.1038/nature11550
25
MaoS.ZhangR.WangD.ZhuW. (2012). The diversity of the fecal bacterial community and its relationship with the concentration of volatile fatty acids in the feces during subacute rumen acidosis in dairy cows.BMC Vet. Res.8:237. 10.1186/1746-6148-8-237
26
Martin-SampedroR.EugenioM.MorenoJ.RevillaE.VillarJ. (2014). Integration of a kraft pulping mill into a forest biorefinery: Pre-extraction of hemicellulose by steam explosion versus steam treatment.Bioresour. Technol.153236–244. 10.1016/j.biortech.2013.11.088
27
NieD.YaoL.XuX.ZhangZ.LiY. (2021). Promoting corn stover degradation via sequential processing of steam explosion and cellulase/lactic acid bacteria-assisted ensilage.Bioresour. Technol.337:125392. 10.1016/j.biortech.2021.125392
28
NoguchiH.ParkJ.TakagiT. (2006). Metagene: Prokaryotic gene finding from environmental genome shotgun sequences.Nucleic Acids Res.345623–5630. 10.1093/nar/gkl723
29
O’HaraE.NevesA.SongY.GuanL. (2020). The role of the gut microbiome in cattle production and health: Driver or passenger?Annu. Rev. Anim. Biosci.8199–220. 10.1146/annurev-animal-021419-083952
30
SaborÃo-MonteroA.Gutiérrez-RivasM.GarcÃa-RodrÃguezA.AtxaerandioR.GoiriI.López de MaturanaE.et al (2020). Structural equation models to disentangle the biological relationship between microbiota and complex traits: Methane production in dairy cattle as a case of study.J. Anim. Breed. Genet.13736–48. 10.1111/jbg.12444
31
ShabatS.SassonG.Doron-FaigenboimA.DurmanT.YaacobyS.Berg MillerM.et al (2016). Specific microbiome-dependent mechanisms underlie the energy harvest efficiency of Ruminants.Isme J.102958–2972. 10.1038/ismej.2016.62
32
ShiQ.LiY.LiY.ChengY.ZhuW. (2019). Effects of steam explosion on lignocellulosic degradation of, and methane production from, corn stover by a co-cultured anaerobic fungus and methanogen.Bioresour. Technol.290:121796. 10.1016/j.biortech.2019.121796
33
TapJ.FuretJ.BensaadaM.PhilippeC.RothH.RabotS.et al (2015). Gut microbiota richness promotes its stability upon increased dietary fibre intake in healthy adults.Environ. Microbiol.174954–4964. 10.1111/1462-2920.13006
34
WangK.NanX.TongJ.ZhaoG.JiangL.XiongB. (2020). Steam explosion pretreatment changes ruminal fermentation in vitro of corn stover by shifting archaeal and bacterial community structure.Front. Microbiol.11:2027. 10.3389/fmicb.2020.02027
35
WangQ.ShenP.ChenB. (2022). Ultracentrifugal milling and steam heating pretreatment improves structural characteristics, functional properties, and in vitro binding capacity of cellulase modified soy okara residues.Food Chem.384:132526. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2022.132526
36
Wenyu CuiY.ZhaoyueS.CaifangC.HangL.KaiyunL.AnweiC. (2023). Effects of steam explosion on phenolic compounds and dietary fiber of grape pomace.LWT173:114350. 10.1016/j.lwt.2022.114350
37
XieH.GaoL.LiZ.MaoG.ZhangH.WangF.et al (2024). Instant catapult steam explosion combined with ammonia water: A complex technology for detoxification of aflatoxin-contaminated peanut cake with the aim of producing a toxicity-free and nutrients retention of animal feed.Heliyon10:e32192. 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e32192
38
YangG.WangJ. (2019). Ultrasound combined with dilute acid pretreatment of grass for improvement of fermentative hydrogen production.Bioresour. Technol.27510–18. 10.1016/j.biortech.2018.12.013
39
YinX.DuanC.JiS.TianP.JuS.YanH.et al (2023). Average daily gain in lambs weaned at 60 days of age is correlated with rumen and rectum microbiota.Microorganisms11:348. 10.3390/microorganisms11020348
40
YinX.JiS.DuanC.JuS.ZhangY.YanH.et al (2021). Rumen fluid transplantation affects growth performance of weaned lambs by altering gastrointestinal microbiota, immune function and feed digestibility.Animal15:100076. 10.1016/j.animal.2020.100076
41
ZhangH.ZhangR.SongY.MiuX.ZhangQ.QuJ.et al (2023). Enhanced enzymatic saccharification and ethanol production of corn stover via pretreatment with urea and steam explosion.Bioresour. Technol.376:128856. 10.1016/j.biortech.2023.128856
42
ZhangW.DiaoC.WangL. (2023). Degradation of lignin in different lignocellulosic biomass by steam explosion combined with microbial consortium treatment.Biotechnol. Biofuels Bioprod.16:55. 10.1186/s13068-023-02306-2
43
ZhaoS.LiG.ZhengN.WangJ.YuZ. (2018). Steam explosion enhances digestibility and fermentation of corn stover by facilitating ruminal microbial colonization.Bioresour. Technol.253244–251. 10.1016/j.biortech.2018.01.024
Summary
Keywords
steam explosion, corn stover, sheep, rumen microbiota, growth performance
Citation
Wang Y, Yin X, Hao K, Wang C, Wei W, Li Y, Gao S, Ji Z, Wang W, Xie Y and Li C (2025) Consumption of steam explosion and fermentation-pretreated corn stover affects the growth performance of sheep by shifting the rumen microbiota community structure. Front. Microbiol. 16:1532746. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2025.1532746
Received
28 November 2024
Accepted
19 March 2025
Published
03 April 2025
Volume
16 - 2025
Edited by
Anusorn Cherdthong, Khon Kaen University, Thailand
Reviewed by
Churairat Moukamnerd, Chiang Mai University, Thailand
Chanon Suntara, Khon Kaen University, Thailand
Updates
Copyright
© 2025 Wang, Yin, Hao, Wang, Wei, Li, Gao, Ji, Wang, Xie and Li.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Yuchun Xie, 878603156@qq.comChangqing Li, lcqeg@126.com
†These authors have contributed equally to this work and share first authorship
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.