ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Microbiol.
Sec. Virology
Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2025.1547831
Consistent trends from different methods for monitoring SARS-CoV-2 in urban wastewater during a 29-month longitudinal study
Provisionally accepted- 1University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
- 2University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
- 3City of Calgary, Calgary, Canada
- 4Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
- 5Alberta Health Services, Stollery Children's Hospital, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Rigorous method development and validation to detect and quantify SARS-CoV-2 RNA in wastewater has led to important advances in community disease surveillance using quantitative molecular biology tools. Despite this progress, agreement on standardized workflows for this important public health objective has been elusive. Multiple studies have compared different protocols but have been limited by short periods of observation or low numbers of test sites. Here we compare results from two parallel workflows for wastewater processing and quantifying SARS-CoV-2 gene targets from five wastewater treatment plants in three large cities in Alberta, Canada for up to 29-months. In total 1,482 wastewater samples were processed using either affinity columns followed by RT-qPCR with DNA-based standards or using ultrafiltration followed by RT-qPCR with RNA-based standards. Results from either workflow correlated well with each other, and with five-day rolling averages of clinically diagnosed COVID-19 cases (i.e., in the early part of the 29-month study period when clinical testing was performed routinely). This highlights that different workflows both effectively and reliably monitored SARS-CoV-2 trends in wastewater. Parallel quantification of pepper mild mottle virus genomes and normalization were inconsistent between the two workflows, suggesting that normalization strategies may require adjustment for different wastewater processing protocols. Freezing wastewater samples diminished measured SARS-CoV-2 RNA levels significantly, whereas short term sample storage at +4°C gave consistent results. Overall, this work demonstrates that different workflows can deliver similarly effective wastewater-based surveillance for community COVID-19 burden. As this emerging technology is used more routinely, investigators should prioritise consistent application of a given workflow to a high-quality standard over time, whereas focusing on all testing programs adopting identical workflows and methods may be unnecessary.
Keywords: SARS-CoV-2, wastewater, Wastewater-based epidemiology, Concentration method, direct extraction, method comparison, Affinity column, Ultrafiltration
Received: 19 Dec 2024; Accepted: 12 May 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 McCalder, Lee, Qiu, Li, Immaraj, Acosta, Bautista, Wilson, Waddell, Du, Ueno, Clark, Krusina, Southern, Williamson, Papparis, Montesclaros, Non, Stefani, Visser, Pradhan, Ruecker, Conly, Hrudey, Frankowski, Lee, Parkins, Pang and Hubert. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Xiaoli Pang, University of Alberta, Edmonton, T6G 2R3, Alberta, Canada
Casey RJ Hubert, University of Calgary, Calgary, T2N 1N4, Alberta, Canada
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.