Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Microbiol.

Sec. Antimicrobials, Resistance and Chemotherapy

Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2025.1570334

This article is part of the Research TopicInnovative Approaches to Preventing and Treating Biofilm-Associated InfectionsView all 5 articles

Assessment of the anti-biofilm effect of UV-C irradiation (254nm) against Healthcare Associated Infections (HAI) related microorganisms

Provisionally accepted
Francesco  PalmaFrancesco Palma1Marta  Díaz-NavarroMarta Díaz-Navarro2Andrés  VisedoAndrés Visedo2Pablo  Sanz-RuízPablo Sanz-Ruíz3Giorgio  BrandiGiorgio Brandi1Giuditta Fiorella  SchiavanoGiuditta Fiorella Schiavano1*Maria  GuembeMaria Guembe2
  • 1University of Urbino Carlo Bo, Urbino, Italy
  • 2Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Madrid, Spain
  • 3Department of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Gregorio Marañón Hospital, Madrid, Catalonia, Spain

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Introduction: Biofilm-related Multidrug Resistance (MDR) is a major problem in healthcareassociated infections (HAI). Hospital surface decontamination is essential to ensure the safety of patients and to eliminate the dissemination of MDR pathogens. New eco-friendly decontamina tion technologies, such as UV-C irradiation, are only gaining popularity now, but their use against the biofilm of common microorganisms causing HAI has not been properly assessed. We aimed to assess the efficacy of UV-C irradiation (254nm) in a 2-phase study by assessing its anti-biofilm effect against sessile cells from microorganisms of hospital interest.The following strains were tested: methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA)(ATCC 29213), methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) (ATCC 43300), Escherichia coli ATCC 25922, Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC 15442, and Candida albicans (ATCC 14053), and a clinical strain of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis. First, the tested Eliminato: m strains' UV-susceptibility was evaluated through irradiation tests on plates using different UV doses, considering both planktonic and 24h-biofilm states. Second, the anti-biofilm effect of UV-C was evaluated on stainless steel discs contaminated with a 24h-biofilm of each strain.Re sults: With a UV dose of 946.7 mJ/cm 2 , the UV-C irradiation on MSSA ATCC 29213, MRSA ATCC 43300, and MRSE biofilm showed a log 10 reduction of 4.34 ± 0.70, 4.70 ± 0.60, and 4.85 ± 0.98, respectively, while C. albicans ATCC 14053 showed higher UV-resistance in 24h-biofilm state, being the log 10 reduction of 3.17 ± 0.08. Against Gram negative bacteria biofilm, a UV dose of 467.8 mJ/cm 2 was enough to achieve a microbial titer <1 CFU/mL. Regarding the 24h-biofilm on discs, a log 10 reduction >3 logs was achieved with all microorganisms applying a UV dose of 946.7 mJ/cm 2 .The application of UV-C irradiation could be a valid additional approach in the management of biofilm HAI.

Keywords: UV-C, Biofilm, Hospital surface, disinfe ction, he althcare -associated infe ction

Received: 06 Feb 2025; Accepted: 04 Jul 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Palma, Díaz-Navarro, Visedo, Sanz-Ruíz, Brandi, Schiavano and Guembe. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Giuditta Fiorella Schiavano, University of Urbino Carlo Bo, Urbino, Italy

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.