ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Microbiol.
Sec. Food Microbiology
Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2025.1570593
Longitudinal study highlights patterns of Salmonella serovar co-occurrence and exclusion in commercial poultry production
Provisionally accepted- 1Poultry Diagnostic and Research Center, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, United States
- 2Department of Microbiology, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, United States
- 3Georgia Poultry Laboratory Network, Gainsville, Georgia, United States
- 4Odum School of Ecology, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, United States
- 5Nolan Integrated Pest Control and Management (NIPCAM) Group, Watkinsville, United States
- 6Center for the Ecology of Infectious Diseases, Odum School of Ecology, University of Georgia, Athens, United States
- 7Department of Infectious Diseases, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, United States
- 8Center for Food Safety, College of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, University of Georgia, Griffin, Georgia, United States
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Recent advances in next-generation sequencing approaches have revealed that Salmonella often exists in multiserovar populations, with important implications for public health as time and resource constraints limit serovar characterization by colony-based isolation methods. It is important to characterize Salmonella population dynamics to then understand how the microbial ecology influences serovar evolution and thus, animal and human health outcomes. Chicken remains the leading source of foodborne Salmonella outbreaks in the U.S., despite reductions in contamination at the product level, underscoring the need for targeted control strategies. This study aimed to survey multiserovar Salmonella populations in broiler breeder flocks and monitor fluctuations throughout production. Deep serotyping was performed on environmental breeder samples collected over two years as part of a surveillance program. About 18% (104/568) of samples contained multiple serovars, with serovar Kentucky negatively associated with other serovars, often excluding them. Longitudinal sampling across two commercial complexes over 65 weeks included pullet and breeder farms. Environmental samples were collected via premoistened boot socks and rodent bait boxes, with on-farm rodents captured. Salmonella prevalence in pullet flocks was 17% (11/64), while 41% (135/330) of breeder samples were positive, peaking at 38 weeks of age. Rodents showed 35% (17/49) positivity in gastrointestinal samples and 9% (3/33) in bait station swabs, with six serovars identified, three of which were shared with flocks. Our cross-sectional and longitudinal Salmonella surveillance highlights the complexity of serovar interactions with further work required to elucidate the mechanisms of competitive exclusion.
Keywords: Salmonella, multiserovar populations, Poultry, CRISPR-SeroSeq, competitive
Received: 03 Feb 2025; Accepted: 18 Jun 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Siceloff, Waltman, Gunning, Nolan, Rohani and Shariat. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Nikki W Shariat, Poultry Diagnostic and Research Center, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Georgia, Athens, 30602, Georgia, United States
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.