Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Microbiol.

Sec. Microorganisms in Vertebrate Digestive Systems

Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2025.1578236

Topological and Spatial Heterogeneity of Gut Microbiota Co-Abundance Networks in Pigs Revealed by using Large-Scale Samples

Provisionally accepted
Lin  WuLin WuYuxin  LiuYuxin Liu*Congying  ChenCongying Chen*Jun  GaoJun Gao*
  • Jiangxi Agricultural University, Nanchang, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Fecal samples have often been used as a proxy for studying the gut microbiota. However, the fecal microbiota does not fully reflect the gut microbiota composition. To elucidate the biogeographical characteristics and interaction networks of porcine gut microbiota, we systematically determined the compositions and co-abundance networks of gut microbiota from small to large intestine using 2,955 microbial samples from ileum, cecum, and feces of F6 (715) and F7 (687) pigs which were slaughtered at the age of 240 days from an experimentally designed heterogeneous pig population by crossing eight divergent breeds using 16S rRNA gene sequencing. The gut microbial composition showed significant spatial heterogeneity. The diversity of the gut microbiota progressively increased along the intestinal tract. Significantly spatial heterogeneity was also observed in the co-abundance networks. The numbers of OTUs showing co-abundance correlations with other OTUs were increased from ileum to cecum and feces. We found that the stronger the co-abundance correlation, the higher the gut location specificity of the co-abundance relationships. Only 644 (0.2%) coabundance relationships among OTUs existed in all three gut locations. Prevotella had the highest number of stable co-abundance relationships, followed by Bacteroidales, Bacteroides, S24-7, and Lachnospiraceae. Topological analysis found that the coabundance network of OTUs in the ileum showed random network characteristics, while the co-abundance networks of OTUs in the cecum and feces showed the scalefree network characteristics in both pig populations. Compared with the co-abundance networks in the cecum and feces, the networks in the ileum had fewer nodes, but more edges, indicating that the ileum microbiota was a microbial ecosystem with a smaller number of microbial species, but closer interactions. However, the pairwise coabundance correlations between OTUs were more independent in the cecum. The coabundance network in the ileum had the lowest stability, but the highest vulnerability, while in the cecum exhibited the highest stability, but low vulnerability. Finally, we characterized the gut location-specific microbial coabundance relationships. Characterizing the phylogenetic structures of gut microbiota in different intestinal biogeographic niches would help to explore the spatial heterogeneity of microbial physiological functions and to develop the strategy regulating gut microbiota targeting to specific gut locations.

Keywords: :co-abundance network, Gut Microbiota, Spatial heterogeneity, 16S rRNA gene, pigs Introduction

Received: 17 Feb 2025; Accepted: 09 Jun 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Wu, Liu, Chen and Gao. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence:
Yuxin Liu, Jiangxi Agricultural University, Nanchang, China
Congying Chen, Jiangxi Agricultural University, Nanchang, China
Jun Gao, Jiangxi Agricultural University, Nanchang, China

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.