ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Microbiol.
Sec. Microbial Symbioses
Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2025.1597836
Outbreak-driven differences in the microbiome composition and diversity of two cassava whitefly Bemisia tabaci mitotypes SSA1-SG1 and SSA1-SG2
Provisionally accepted- 1Ecole Nationale d'Agriculture de Meknès, Meknès, Morocco
- 2University of Greenwich, London, London, United Kingdom
- 3Tanzania Agricultural Research Institute (TARI), Dodoma, Dodoma, Tanzania
- 4Centre de Coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement (Réunion), Saint-Pierre, Réunion
- 5National Crops Resources Research Institute (NaCRRI), Kampala, Uganda
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Since the 1990s, outbreaking populations of the whitefly Bemisia tabaci species complex (Sub-Saharan Africa 1 and 2) have heavily infested cassava in Uganda and eastern Africa.These superabundant SSA1 whiteflies from outbreaking areas carry microbiomes that might influence their fitness. Nonetheless, the factors contributing to the surge of these populations and their connection to the whitefly microbiome remain uncertain. To explore microbiome structure, diversity, and potential contributions to outbreaks of B. tabaci SSA1 species, we performed 16S rDNA amplicon sequencing. Endosymbionts (excluding Portiera) and the meta-microbiome were analysed separately across 56 SSA 1 samples identified using a partial fragment of the mtCOI gene from 8 sites (32 outbreakings and 24 non-outbreakings).Two mitochondrial profiles were obtained within the samples named here as mitotypes SSA1-SG1 and SSA1-SG2. We investigated microbiome differences at two levels: (i) between two mitochondrial mitotypes, SSA1-SG1 and SSA1-SG2, and (ii) between outbreaking and non-outbreaking whitefly populations. Our results showed that the two mitotypes exhibited significantly different endosymbiont diversity (p < 0.0001), structures (p < 0.01, determined by ADONIS and Capscale), and co-occurrence networks. At the population level, significant differences in microbiome diversity were observed between outbreaking and non-outbreaking populations (Simpson index: p = 0.007; Shannon index: p = 0.006), with outbreaking populations showing reduced microbial diversity. Community structure also differed significantly (p = 0.001), as revealed by ADONIS and Capscale analyses using Bray-Curtis metrics. Outbreaking SSA1-SG1 whiteflies showed the highest microbial richness (mean = 63 ASVs), compared to an overall average of 45 ASVs across all samples. Co-occurrence patterns were highly structured, indicating non-random microbial interactions and shifts. Overall, our findings highlight the microbiome as a key factor in local invasions and epidemic emergence. Future research should focus on identifying specific bacterial contributors to better understand their role in outbreak dynamics.
Keywords: whitefly, SSA1 SG1, SSA1-SG2, Bemisia tabaci, mtCO1, 16S rDNA, microbiome, Uganda, Co-occurrence network, diversity
Received: 21 Mar 2025; Accepted: 24 Jun 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 ELHAMSS, ALLY, Delatte, Omongo, Colvin and Gowda. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Hajar ELHAMSS, Ecole Nationale d'Agriculture de Meknès, Meknès, Morocco
Maruthi Gowda, University of Greenwich, London, SE10 9LS, London, United Kingdom
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.