ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Microbiol.
Sec. Antimicrobials, Resistance and Chemotherapy
Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2025.1597860
This article is part of the Research TopicEmerging Antimicrobials: Sources, Mechanisms of Action, Spectrum of Activity, Combination Antimicrobial Therapy, and Resistance MechanismsView all 36 articles
A Matched Pilot Cohort Study of Intravenous Omadacycline in the Treatment of Severe Pneumonia Associated with Carbapenem-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii
Provisionally accepted
- Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province, China
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Background: Carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB)-caused severe pneumonia is associated with high mortality rates, and treatment options are limited. Tetracyclines, including tigecycline and omadacycline, have in vitro activity against CRAB. We conducted this study to explore the efficacy of omadacycline in CRAB-caused severe pneumonia.Methods: This retrospective cohort study was performed by collecting data on severe CRABcaused pneumonia cases treated with omadacycline or tigecycline at Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital from January 2022 to June 2024. A 1:1 propensity score-based matching design based on baseline characteristics was utilized. We compared the incidence of clinical response at day 14 or at the end of treatment (EOT) and other clinical outcomes between the two cohorts.Results: A total of 40 patients were analyzed, with 20 patients in each cohort. The clinical success rate at day 14 or at the EOT was 65% (13/20) in the omadacycline group compared to 55% (11/20) in the tigecycline group. Both groups had an equal mortality rate, with 8 patients dying within 28 days. Development of tigecycline resistance was observed in one patient. The average duration of invasive mechanical ventilation, vasopressor, renal replacement therapy was also comparable in both groups. Adverse events occurred in 50% (10/20) of patients in the omadacycline group and 75% (15/20) in the tigecycline group, with coagulopathy being significantly lower in the omadacycline group (1/20, 5% vs. 7/20, 35%). Gastrointestinal events were reported in 10% (2/20) of the omadacycline group compared to 30% (6/20) in the tigecycline group. Abnormal liver function was observed in 9/20 patients (45%) in the omadacycline group and 6/20 patients (30%) in the tigecycline group.Conclusions: This pilot study was the first to explore the efficacy and safety of omadacycline in CRAB-caused pneumonia. Omadacycline demonstrated comparable efficacy to tigecycline in this small pilot study in the treatment of CRAB-caused pneumonia and has a lower incidence of coagulopathy compared to tigecycline, suggesting it may be a viable option, for treating CRAB-caused severe pneumonia, but further prospective research with larger sample sizes is needed to confirm these findings.
Keywords: omadacycline, tigecycline, Carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii, Pneumonia, retrospective matched cohort study
Received: 21 Mar 2025; Accepted: 09 Jul 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Chen, 陈, Hu, Gu, Jingjing, Liu and Zhang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Dayu Chen, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Nanjing, 210008, Jiangsu Province, China
Jinchun Liu, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Nanjing, 210008, Jiangsu Province, China
Haixia Zhang, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Nanjing, 210008, Jiangsu Province, China
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.