Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Microbiol.

Sec. Microbial Symbioses

Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2025.1598446

Dynamic Responses of Gut Microbiota to Agricultural and Wildfire Ash: Insights from Different Amphibian Developmental Stages

Provisionally accepted
Qing  TongQing Tong1,2*Yue-Liang  PanYue-Liang Pan2Qiu-ru  FanQiu-ru Fan2Xin-Zhou  LongXin-Zhou Long2Ming-da  XuMing-da Xu2Wen-jing  DongWen-jing Dong2Liyonf  CuiLiyonf Cui2Zhi-Wen  LuoZhi-Wen Luo2*
  • 1Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin, China
  • 2Jiamusi University, Jiamusi, Heilongjiang Province, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Combustion by-products-specifically wildfire ash and rice-straw ash-are emerging contaminants in freshwater ecosystems. However, their impacts on amphibian survival and gut microbiota across various developmental stages remains largely unclear, thereby limiting evidence-based conservation strategies in fire-affected habitats. This study evaluated the effects of artificial water (control, C) and aqueous extracts of ash (AEAs) derived from wildfire ash (W) and rice straw ash (S) on the survival and gut (G) microbiota of Rana dybowskii tadpoles (T) and adult frogs (F). Exposure to wildfire ash significantly reduced tadpole survival compared to rice straw ash, whereas no significant differences were observed in adult frogs. Alpha diversity of the gut microbiota differed significantly among tadpole groups but not among adult groups.Bray-Curtis and weighted UniFrac analyses revealed significant differences in the gut microbiota of adult frogs and tadpoles across different treatment groups. Linear discriminant analysis effect size (LEfSe) identified a significant enrichment of specific bacterial genera across treatment groups. BugBase analysis indicated that in the TCG, TSG, and TWG groups, notable variations in the TCG, TSG, and TWG groups, there were notable differences in Forms-Biofilms and Potentially-Pathogenic, while in the FCG, FSG, and FWG groups, significant differences were observed in Aerobic, Gram-Positive, Potentially-Pathogenic, and Stress-Tolerant. These findings suggest that wildfire ash exhibits greater toxicity than rice straw ash to both life stages of R. dybowskii, with tadpoles being more vulnerable. By elucidating the link between ashderived pollutants and amphibian gut health, this study underscores the growing threat of routine straw burning and intensifying wildfires to global freshwater biodiversity and advocates for ash-specific mitigation measures and microbiota-informed conservation strategies.

Keywords: Rana dybowskii, Gut Microbiota, Wildfire ash, Rice straw, Survival

Received: 23 Mar 2025; Accepted: 22 Jul 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Tong, Pan, Fan, Long, Xu, Dong, Cui and Luo. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence:
Qing Tong, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin, China
Zhi-Wen Luo, Jiamusi University, Jiamusi, 154007, Heilongjiang Province, China

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.