CORRECTION article

Front. Microbiol., 22 April 2025

Sec. Microbe and Virus Interactions with Plants

Volume 16 - 2025 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2025.1605122

Corrigendum: Identification and characterization of potato zebra chip resistance among wild Solanum species

This article is a correction to:

  1. Identification and Characterization of Potato Zebra Chip Resistance Among Wild Solanum Species

    1. Read original article
Victoria Mora&#x;Victoria Mora1†Manikandan Ramasamy&#x;Manikandan Ramasamy1†Mona B. DamajMona B. Damaj1Sonia IrigoyenSonia Irigoyen1Veronica AnconaVeronica Ancona2Carlos A. Avila,Carlos A. Avila1,3Maria Isabel ValesMaria Isabel Vales3Freddy Ibanez,Freddy Ibanez1,4Kranthi K. Mandadi,, Kranthi K. Mandadi1,5,6*
  • 1Texas A&M AgriLife Research and Extension Center, Weslaco, TX, United States
  • 2Department of Agriculture, Agribusiness, and Environmental Sciences, Texas A&M University-Kingsville, Weslaco, TX, United States
  • 3Department of Horticultural Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, United States
  • 4Department of Entomology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, United States
  • 5Department of Plant Pathology & Microbiology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, United States
  • 6Institute for Advancing Health Through Agriculture, Texas A&M AgriLife, College Station, TX, United States

A Corrigendum on
Identification and Characterization of Potato Zebra Chip Resistance Among Wild Solanum Species

by Mora, V., Ramasamy, M., Damaj, M. B., Irigoyen, S., Ancona, V., Avila, C. A., Vales, M. I., Ibanez, F., and Mandadi, K. K. (2022). Front. Microbiol. 13:857493. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.857493

In the published article, there was an error in Figure 4 as published. The Figure 4D chart labels corresponding to Atlantic and Sb-PI310927 genotypes were inadvertently reversed during formatting. The corrected Figure 4 and its caption appear below.

Figure 4
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 4. Olfactometer, oviposition, and survival evaluations of Bactericera cockerelli adults on Solanum berthaultii PI310927. (A) Olfactometer (Y-tube) behavioral response of potato psyllid adults to plant volatiles under stable conditions observed every 15 min for a maximum of 60 min. Bar graphs represent the overall mean percentages of adults choosing either odor source ± standard deviation (n = 10). (B) Potato psyllid's behavioral response to Sb-PI310927 and susceptible Atlantic (control). Bar graphs represent the mean percentages of adults ± standard deviation (n = 10). (C) Female psyllids oviposition at day 7 in no-choice assays using whole plants. Bar graphs represent the mean number of oviposited eggs per replicate ± standard deviation (n = 10); the p-value was calculated by Student's t-test relative to the Atlantic control, *P ≤ 0.0001. (D) Survival analysis of potato psyllid adults (n = 10) for 7 days showed significant psyllids mortality after exposure to Sb-PI310927 when compared with Atlantic plants. The p-value was calculated by the Kaplan–Meier analysis, P < 0.0001. SD, standard deviation; ns, no significance.

The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.

Publisher's note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Keywords: Candidatus Liberibacter solanacearum, Fastidious bacteria, Bactericera cockerelli, zebra chip (ZC), wild accessions, resistant traits, antibiosis

Citation: Mora V, Ramasamy M, Damaj MB, Irigoyen S, Ancona V, Avila CA, Vales MI, Ibanez F and Mandadi KK (2025) Corrigendum: Identification and characterization of potato zebra chip resistance among wild Solanum species. Front. Microbiol. 16:1605122. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2025.1605122

Received: 02 April 2025; Accepted: 04 April 2025;
Published: 22 April 2025.

Edited and reviewed by: Xiangming Xu, National Institute of Agricultural Botany (NIAB), United Kingdom

Copyright © 2025 Mora, Ramasamy, Damaj, Irigoyen, Ancona, Avila, Vales, Ibanez and Mandadi. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Kranthi K. Mandadi, a2ttYW5kYWRpQHRhbXUuZWR1

†These authors have contributed equally to this work

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.