ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Microbiol.
Sec. Infectious Agents and Disease
Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2025.1605469
Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli illness in Aotearoa | New Zealand, 2016-2022: Epidemiological, genomic and traditional typing analyses provide insight into a significant endemic disease while highlighting knowledge gaps
Provisionally accepted- 1Institute of Environmental Science and Research Limited (ESR), Christchurch Science Centre., Christchurch, Canterbury, New Zealand
- 2Institute of Environmental Science and Research, Upper Hutt, New Zealand
- 3Institute of Environmental Science and Research, Porirua, New Zealand
- 4The Hopkirk Research Institute, AgResearch, Palmerston North, Manawatu-Wanganui, New Zealand
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Shiga toxin producing Escherichia coli (STEC) cause significant endemic disease in Aotearoa | New Zealand (NZ) with a 2022 case incidence rate of 19.9/100,000 population. The introduction of culture independent diagnostic testing has been pivotal in elucidating STEC case numbers. Epidemiological data from 5,769 cases of STEC infection confirmed during the seven-year period 2016-2022 were reviewed in conjunction with epidemiological typing data from 3,746 case isolates (2,939 analysed via whole genome sequencing). Severe illness was reported for 25% of all STEC cases, and 23% of cases were hospitalized. All age groups were affected, but the greatest level of morbidity was observed in those less than five years old where the haemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS) incidence rate was 2.86/100,000. Serotypes O157:H7 and O26:H11 together accounted for 54% of infections. Other common serotypes differed from those reported as common elsewhere and included O128:H2, O38:H26, O146:H21 and O91:H14. Shiga toxin subtype 2a strains were more associated with serious illness than other subtypes, regardless of eae positivity. Multiple STEC strains were inadvertently identified in 1.2% of culture positive case samples suggesting that carriage of more than one strain could be more prevalent. Single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) analysis indicated that most STEC cases were sporadic as 5-SNP genomic clusters were uncommon. Infection sources are rarely proven as food and environmental sample data are limited and insufficient to assist in determining pathways to infection. By combining isolate WGS-derived typing data and case epidemiological data we demonstrated the importance of shifting the focus from a select number of STEC serogroups to composite seropathotypes - based on full serotype, ST, cgMLST relatedness and stx sub-toxin profile - to assist in understanding both the role of each type in disease severity, and relationships across historical type groups. This knowledge may be useful in future prioritizing of clinical and public health resources.
Keywords: Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli, STEC, surveillance, Epidemiology, Epidemiological typing, whole genome sequencing, seropathotype, severity
Received: 03 Apr 2025; Accepted: 09 May 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 (Jackie) Wright, Duncan, Strydom, Paine, Jefferies, De Ligt, Rivas, Addidle, Cookson, Winter, Miller, Casey and Wang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Jacqueline (Jackie) Wright, Institute of Environmental Science and Research Limited (ESR), Christchurch Science Centre., Christchurch, Canterbury, New Zealand
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.