Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Microbiol., 19 June 2025

Sec. Infectious Agents and Disease

Volume 16 - 2025 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2025.1610739

This article is part of the Research TopicWomen in Infectious Agents and Disease: 2025View all articles

Staphylococcus aureus nasal carriage before breast reconstruction: antibiotic resistance, biofilm formation, and virulence genes—a single center in vitro observation

  • 1Department of Medical Biology, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland
  • 2Department of Surgical Oncology, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń, Collegium Medicum in Bydgoszcz, Bydgoszcz, Poland
  • 3Department of Clinical Breast Cancer and Reconstructive Surgery, Prof. F. Łukaszczyk Oncology Centre, Bydgoszcz, Poland
  • 4Department of Microbiology, Prof. F. Łukaszczyk Oncology Centre, Bydgoszcz, Poland

Introduction: Infections caused by Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) in patients undergoing mastectomy followed by breast reconstruction present significant therapeutic challenges. Studies suggest that S. aureus may be transmitted from nasal carriage, potentially leading to postoperative infections. However, knowledge regarding the potential pathogenicity of S. aureus nasal carriage strains in women undergoing breast reconstruction in Poland remains limited. This study aimed to characterize S. aureus isolates obtained from screening nasal swabs.

Methods: A total of 33 methicillin-sensitive S. aureus (MSSA) isolates were analyzed. These strains exhibited a high prevalence of genes encoding adhesion and antibiotic resistance. The most frequently detected virulence genes included sarA (100%), an activator of protein A; cna (100%), encoding collagen adhesin; blaZ (100%), associated with β-lactamase production; the icaADBC operon (82–100%), responsible for extracellular polysaccharide synthesis and intracellular adhesion; and bap (36%), encoding a surface-associated biofilm protein.

Results: Most isolates (79–100%) demonstrated a strong capacity for biofilm formation and exopolysaccharide production, confirmed by independent methods. Notably, all strains (100%) remained susceptible to ciprofloxacin at increased exposure levels. RAPD analysis revealed low genetic diversity among the isolates.

Discussion: Our findings indicate that S. aureus isolates from nasal carriers undergoing breast implantation exhibit antibiotic resistance, biofilm-forming ability, and harbor multiple virulence genes. Early detection of S. aureus colonization via nasal swab screening may be crucial for managing infection risk in patients undergoing breast reconstruction.

Graphical abstract
www.frontiersin.org

Graphical Abstract.

1 Background

Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) is commonly found in the human microbiome of the upper pulmonary tract and skin. Persistent nasal carriage of S. aureus, found in 10–30% of the general population, is a risk factor for many types of infections (Sakr et al., 2019). The prevalence of S. aureus nasal carriage infections is observed in a wide spectrum of diseases, for example, in patients with osteoarthritis, degenerative joint disease, rheumatoid arthritis, surgical wound infections (SWIs), chronic autoimmune inflammatory disease (Asai et al., 2022; Lemaignen et al., 2018), and surgical site infections (SSIs). The cases of peri-implant surgery infections may affect 18–45.2% of patients, caused primarily due to S. aureus; however, most etiological agents are Staphylococcus epidermidis (29%) and Gram-negative rods (24–54.75%) (Flouchi et al., 2021; Michalopoulos et al., 2022; Mukhtar et al., 2009; Viola et al., 2014). Nasal carriage of S. aureus is related to 20–42% of breast implant-associated infections (BIAIs) (Michalopoulos et al., 2022; Mukhtar et al., 2009; Viola et al., 2014; Nahabedian et al., 2003; Duran Ramirez et al., 2022; Tobias et al., 2023).

Current literature lacks studies focused exclusively on MSSA; most available analyses primarily emphasize methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). However, MSSA accounts for 30.6% of breast implant infections, while MRSA is responsible for only 3.5% (Franchelli et al., 2018). The potential differences in pathogenicity and virulence between MRSA and MSSA strains remain unresolved, although proteomic changes have been suggested as contributing factors (Rozgonyi et al., 2007; Tu et al., 2021). Some studies even question whether MSSA might be more pathogenic than MRSA in clinical settings (Bride et al., 2019). Although MSSA is a recognized cause of surgical site infections (SSIs), its specific role via nasal carriage in implant-based breast reconstruction remains poorly understood. High-level MSSA nasal carriers have a 3–6 fold higher risk of healthcare-associated infections than non-carriers or low-level carriers (Tsang et al., 2018). Notably, most of these infections are endogenous, originating from the patient’s microbiota (Long et al., 2024; Wenzel, 2019). MSSA nasal carriage is becoming increasingly common, particularly among oncological patients; however, data on its characteristics in Polish women undergoing breast reconstruction are limited.

This study aims to address this knowledge gap by investigating the role of MSSA nasal carriage in SSIs following breast reconstruction in a Polish cohort. Moreover, the patient’s clinical conditions influence the surgical procedure, which may affect infection risk. For example, lymph node dissection has been associated with a 6.29-fold increased risk of implant infection compared with procedures without lymph node removal (Rouquette et al., 2015). SSIs may also affect the phenotypic expression and virulence gene profiles of S. aureus strains. These strains possess multiple virulence factors, notably a strong capacity for biofilm formation, which enhances adhesion to collagen and materials commonly used in breast implants. Infection can lead to inflammation, pain, and swelling, and in severe cases, may necessitate implant removal.

BIAIs are a major complication following mastectomy with reconstruction and often require antibiotic therapy or implant removal (Duran Ramirez et al., 2022; Kathju et al., 2024; Lohmeyer et al., 2021). Anti-MSSA antibiotics have been associated with a reduced risk of SSIs both in patients undergoing mastectomy alone and those with immediate reconstruction (Warren et al., 2022). Nonetheless, MSSA can exhibit antibiotic resistance, such as macrolide-lincosamide-streptogramin B (MLSB) resistance or vancomycin intermediate/resistant phenotypes (VISA/VRSA) (Warren et al., 2022; Kengne et al., 2024). Antibiotic prophylaxis, including MSSA eradication, has been shown to reduce SSI risk post-mastectomy. Clinical strategies for nasal decolonization include mupirocin nasal ointment, chlorhexidine body washes, vancomycin, triple antibiotic pocket irrigator (TAPI), and doxycycline-coated silicone implants (Lisa et al., 2024; Duran Ramirez et al., 2023; Hemmingsen et al., 2024; Baker et al., 2020; Gofstein-Hayuth et al., 2023). However, increasing resistance to mupirocin highlights the need for novel decolonization agents (Sakr et al., 2019; Labrecque et al., 2023). Preoperative screening for S. aureus nasal carriage, including both MSSA and MRSA, followed by appropriate antibiotic prophylaxis, can help reduce the incidence of BIAIs and shorten hospital stays (Humphreys et al., 2016). To address these clinical concerns, multicenter randomized trials are necessary to establish clear guidelines for screening and treatment of MSSA and MRSA nasal carriage in patients undergoing breast reconstruction (Hart et al., 2017; Papa et al., 2021). Finally, maintaining proper hygiene of the hands and surgical site is essential for women with breast implants to reduce the risk of S. aureus-related infections (Zhao et al., 2021).

This study aimed to characterize S. aureus strains isolated from the nasal carriage of Polish patients qualified for implant breast reconstruction, with a focus on the pathogenicity potential of these strains.

1.1 Experiment design

Screening of Staphylococcus aureus nasal carriage was performed on all patients undergoing treatment at the Department of Clinical Breast Cancer and Reconstructive Surgery at the Oncology Center, Prof. Franciszek Łukaszczyk Memorial Hospital in Bydgoszcz, who were eligible for breast reconstruction from June 2020 to August 2021. The patients had undergone mastectomy and post-mastectomy reconstruction. A total of 132 reconstructions among 124 patients were performed. All patients were screened for S. aureus nasal carriage before admission to the hospital. Clinical samples were collected within 30 days before hospitalization, according to standard laboratory protocols and following the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee, along with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. This study was approved by the Bioethics Committee of the Collegium Medicum UMK in Bydgoszcz (registration number KB 578/2021). A study was provided on clinical isolates from a retrospective collection collected over June 2020 and August 2021.

1.2 Material—study group

In the study, positive nasal screening was observed in 31 women (25%) before breast reconstruction. A total of 33 S. aureus isolates were obtained from these 31 patients.

The isolates were stored in tryptic soy broth (BioMérieux, France) with 20% (v/v) glycerol (Merck, Germany) and frozen at −70 ± 2°C until further pathogenicity analysis. Each patient contributed one isolate, whereas two patients provided two isolates each due to delayed surgeries.

In one case, a second S. aureus was obtained approximately 1 month after the first isolate (14** and 23**, respectively). In another case, a second isolate (number 32*) was isolated 8 months after the first (number 7*) (Figure 1). The reason for repeated sampling was the postponement of surgical procedures for clinical reasons and a second reconstruction was planned (replacement of the expander with an implant).

Figure 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1. Phenotypic and genotypic characterization of S. aureus isolates. More than one S. aureus isolate from patient: 7* / 32* and 14** / 23**. Antibiotics: FOX, cefoxitin; GEN, gentamicin; AN, amikacin; TOB, tobramycin; E, erythromycin; CLI, clindamycin; CIP, ciprofloxacin; SXT, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole; MUP, mupirocin; MSSA, methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus. Genes: icaA, icaB, icaC, icaD, sasG, bap, cna, biofilm formation and adhesion; luk, smr, qac, sarA—encoding Panton-Valentine leukocidin (PVL), chlorhexidine and quaternary ammonium resistance, antiseptic resistance, an activator of protein A; mecA, blaZ, aac-aph, ermC, ermA, mupA, mupB, tetM, tetK, and vanA—encoding resistance to methicillin, β-lactams, aminoglycosides, erythromycin, mupirocin, tetracycline, and vancomycin. www.frontiersin.org S, sensitive to antibiotics; www.frontiersin.org I, susceptible, increased exposure; www.frontiersin.org R, resistant; www.frontiersin.org 0, lack of gene; www.frontiersin.org 1, gene detection. CongoRed—exopolysaccharide synthesis phenotype; CV—biofilm staining by crystal violet and evaluated by spectrophotometric method, the mean values of absorbance for biofilm mass: light purple—moderate biofilm producer, purple—strong biofilm producer; CFU—biofilm cell count of averaged values in Log CFU/mL > initial concentration (red line—6.0 Log CFU/mL).

2 Methods

Retrospective analysis presented in this study is based on a database from the Department of Microbiology, Prof. F. Łukaszczyk Oncology Centre in Bydgoszcz, regarding standard tests for phenotypic identification of microorganisms and describing antibiotic sensitivity.

2.1 Identification

The samples were processed using culture-based methods on a Staph/Strep Selective Medium (Oxoid Deutschland GmbH, Wesel, Germany) under aerobic conditions at 35 ± 2°C. After 24 h, suspected S. aureus isolates were identified using a coagulase test, the commercial Dry Spot Staphytest Plus (Oxoid Limited, Basingstoke, Hampshire, England), and matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time of flight mass spectrometry (IVD MALDI Biotyper Smart System, microflex LT/SH smart, Bruker Daltonik, Bremen, Germany).

2.2 Antimicrobial typing

Cefoxitin, gentamicin, amikacin, tobramycin, erythromycin, clindamycin, ciprofloxacin, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, and mupirocin were selected for susceptibility testing, determined using the disk diffusion method on Mueller–Hinton agar (BioMérieux, France) following the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST). The results were interpreted according to the EUCAST breakpoint tables v. 15.0 from 2025-01-01 (The European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing, 2025). S. aureus ATCC 29213 MSSA and ATCC 43300 MRSA were included as quality controls.

2.3 MRSA screening

Screening swabs taken from the patients were inoculated onto Brilliance MRSA 2 agar (Thermo Fisher Scientific, UK) for MRSA detection. All agar plates were read after 18–24 h of incubation at 35 ± 2°C, following the manufacturer’s instructions. Affiliation to the MRSA/MSSA group was further confirmed using the PCR Xpert S. aureus Nasal Complete Assay (Cepheid, US), which detects specific sequences of staphylococcal protein A (spa gene), the methicillin/oxacillin resistance (mecA), and the staphylococcal cassette chromosome (SCCmec) inserted into the chromosomal attB site.

Experimental analyses of virulence factors and genes encoding them were performed at the Department of Medical Biology, Medical University of Warsaw.

2.4 Characterization of exopolysaccharide (slime) production

Exopolysaccharide production (commonly referred to as the slime phenotype in earlier literature) was assessed using Congo Red Agar (CRA), prepared with 0.8 g of Congo Red (Merck, Germany), 36 g of sucrose (Chempur, Poland), and 1.5% agar, and Brain Heart Broth (Thermo Fisher Scientific, UK) (Freeman et al., 1989; Arciola et al., 2001). After 72 h of aerobic incubation at 37°C, colonies were evaluated based on morphology: black/dark, rough, and dry colonies were classified as exopolysaccharide-positive (indicative of biofilm matrix synthesis), while smooth, red/Bordeaux-colored colonies were classified as negative.

2.5 Biofilm phenotypic qualitative and quantitative assays

Biofilm formation was assessed using a crystal violet staining assay (Stepanovic et al., 2000). Bacterial suspensions in Luria–Bertani (LB) broth (Merck, Germany) were adjusted to 106 CFU/mL and added to sterile 96-well flat-bottomed polystyrene microplates (200 μL per well) (Kartell, Italy). Plates were incubated for 48 h at 35 ± 2°. The negative control wells contained LB broth only. After incubation, the wells were stained with 0.15% crystal violet (Merck, Germany) for 15 min at room temperature. Excess day was removed, and the bound dye was solubilized in 96% ethyl alcohol (Chempur, Poland). Absorbance was measured at 570 nm using a Synergy HTX multi-mode reader (BioTeK Instruments, USA). Biofilm production was analyzed by comparing the absorbance values for negative (ATCC29213) and positive (ATCC12600) biofilm producers to those of a control without bacteria. The classes were defined as follows: An isolate < A control—non-biofilm producer, A control < A isolate < 2 × A control—weak producer, 2 × A control < A isolate < 4 × A control—moderate, and 4 × A control < A isolate, and strong producer. This experiment was repeated four times independently.

For the quantitative assay, biofilms were grown under identical conditions. After the supernatants were removed, the biofilms were resuspended in 150 μL of PBS (Thermo Fisher Scientific, UK) by scraping. Serial 10-fold dilutions were prepared up to 10−5, and 10 μL of aliquots were plated on LB agar. Log CFU/mL was calculated after overnight incubation at 35 ± 2°C. The experiment was performed in two independent replicates.

2.6 DNA extraction and PCR

Genomic DNA from S. aureus isolates was extracted using a Genomic Mini DNA Kit (A&A Biotechnology, Poland) according to the manufacturer’s instructions, with the addition of lysostaphin solution (10 mg/mL) and lysozyme (4,000 μg/mL) (A&A Biotechnology, Poland). DNA quality and quantity were assessed spectrophotometrically (NanoDrop; DeNovix Ds-11, US). Residual RNA was removed by RNase A digestion (Blirt S.A., Poland).

PCR reactions were performed in a Mastercycler Personal (Eppendorf, Germany) using primers listed in Table 1. The length of PCR products was determined by electrophoresis on a 1.5% (w/v) agarose gel stained with 0.5 μg/mL ethidium bromide (Merck KGaA; Darmstadt, Germany). DNA patterns were visualized and analyzed using ImageLab software (Bio-Rad, Inc., US).

Table 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. Primers used in study.

2.7 PCR confirmation of S. aureus and MSSA/MRSA

The genus Staphylococcus was confirmed using specific 16S rRNA primers, and S. aureus was differentiated from coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) using nuc gene primers (Bissong and Ateba, 2020; McClure et al., 2017; Mkhize et al., 2021; Shortle, 1983). Resistance to methicillin/oxacillin was confirmed by detecting the mecA (McClure et al., 2017; Parvin et al., 2021; Zhang et al., 2004).

PCR was performed in 25 μL volumes consisting of 10 pM of each primer, 10 μM deoxynucleotides, 10 x buffer, MgCl2, HotStar Taq Plus DNA polymerase (Qiagen, Netherlands), or recombinant Taq DNA polymerase, and template DNA. All reagents, unless specified, were obtained from Thermo Fisher Scientific, UK. The PCR conditions were as follows: an initial denaturation phase at 94°C for 5 min, followed by 25–35 cycles of denaturation at 94°C for 30 s, annealing at 55°C for 30 s or 1 min, extension at 72°C for 1 min, and a final extension phase at 72°C for 10 min.

S. aureus ATCC29213 MSSA, ATCC25923 MSSA, ATCC12600 MSSA, and ATCC43300 MRSA strains were used as controls.

2.8 Molecular analysis of biofilm and adhesion genes

Molecular analysis of adhesive and biofilm-forming genes focused on genes involved in polysaccharide intercellular adhesin (PIA) biosynthesis, including icaA, icaB, icaC, and icaD, which are critical for extracellular polysaccharide synthesis and intracellular adhesion (Arciola et al., 2001; Bissong and Ateba, 2020; Barbieri et al., 2015; Khudor and Idbeis, 2022; Pinto et al., 2015; Reiter et al., 2012; Vancraeynest et al., 2004; Vasudevan et al., 2003). The sasG gene, encoding surface adhesin (Barbieri et al., 2015; Pinto et al., 2015; Reiter et al., 2012), and the bap gene, encoding a cell wall-associated surface protein (Bissong and Ateba, 2020; Vancraeynest et al., 2004; Cucarella et al., 2001; Tormo et al., 2005; Vautor et al., 2008), were also examined. Furthermore, the cna gene, a member of the Microbial Surface Components Recognizing Adhesive Matrix Molecules (MSCRAMMs), responsible for collagen binding, was also analyzed (Barbieri et al., 2015; Vancraeynest et al., 2004; Cavalcante et al., 2021; Montanaro et al., 1999).

All PCR reactions were prepared as described above, using the same components in a total volume of 25 μL. The amplification of biofilm genes was performed as follows: 95°C for 5 min, 30–40 cycle of denaturation at 95°C for 20–30 s, annealing at a specific temperature for each gene for 30 s or 1 min, extension at 72°C for 1 min, and final extension at 72°C for 7 min.

PCR conditions for the cna gene were conducted with initial denaturation at 94°C for 4 min, followed by 35 cycles of denaturation at 94°C for 1 min, annealing at 54°C for 1 min, extension at 72°C for 1 min, and a final extension at 72°C for 10 min.

2.9 Detection of virulence and antibiotic resistance encoding genes

The genetic markers affecting S. aureus virulence and resistance profiles were identified based on a diverse array of genes associated with pathogenicity and antimicrobial resistance. Key virulence determinants included the luk gene (McClure et al., 2006), encoding Panton-Valentine leukocidin (PVL), associated with necrotic skin and soft tissue infections (Mkhize et al., 2021; Barbieri et al., 2015; Jarraud et al., 2002; Lina et al., 1999), and sarA, an activator of protein A (Gowrishankar et al., 2016).

Antiseptic resistance mechanisms were attributed to the smr encoding resistance to chlorhexidine and quaternary ammonium compounds (McClure et al., 2017; Datta and Huang, 2008), and qac genes (McClure et al., 2017; Noguchi et al., 2005).

For antibiotic resistance, several key genes were identified: aminoglycoside resistance genes aac-aph and blaZ, related to the production of β-lactamase and resistance to penicillin (Bissong and Ateba, 2020; Mkhize et al., 2021). The vanA gene is associated with vancomycin resistance (Bissong and Ateba, 2020; McClure et al., 2017; Al-Amery et al., 2019; Azimian et al., 2012; Girijan and Pillai, 2021; Maharjan et al., 2021; Vazquez-Rosas et al., 2021), and other genes, such as tetK, tetM, ermA, and ermC, are linked to tetracycline and erythromycin resistance, respectively (Mkhize et al., 2021; Aarestrup et al., 2000; Dong et al., 2020). Additionally, the mupA and mupB genes conferred mupirocin resistance (McClure et al., 2017; Seah et al., 2012).

All PCR reactions were prepared as described above, using the same components in a total volume of 25 μL Thermal cycling conditions were optimized for specific gene targets as follows: (1) smr, qac, and mupA/mupB 94°C 5 min, 10 cycles of 94°C 30 s, 60°C 30 s, 72°C 45 s, and next step 94°C 30 s, 25 cycles of 94°C 30 s, 50°C 30 s, 72°C 45 s, and 72°C 7 min; (2) vanA and vanB 94°C 5 min, 30 cycles of 94°C 30 s, vanA 54°C 1 min, vanB 50°C 45 s, 72°C 1 min, and 72°C 10 min; (3) sarA 94°C 4 min, 35 cycles of 94°C 1 min, 54°C 1 min, 72°C 1 min, and 72°C 10 min; (4) luk and aac-aph 95°C 5 min, 25 cycles of 95°C 30 s, 55°C 30 s, 72°C 45 s, and 72°C 7 min; (5) blaZ 95°C 5 min, 30 cycles of 95°C 30 s, 55°C 1 min, 72°C 1 min, and 72°C 7 min; (6) ermA and ermC 94°C 4 min, 35 cycles of 94°C 30 s, 53°C 30 s, 72°C 1 min, and 72°C 10 min; and (7) tetK and tetM 94°C 4 min, 35 cycles of 94°C 1 min, 55°C 1 min, 72°C 1 min, and 72°C 10 min.

S. aureus ATCC 29213 MSSA, ATCC 25923 MSSA, ATCC 12600 MSSA, and ATCC 43300 MRSA strains were used as quality control.

2.10 RAPD grouping method

The genetic relatedness of S. aureus carriage isolates was assessed using the Random Amplification of Polymorphic DNA PCR method (RAPD-PCR) with three short primers: AP-PCR1 (5′ GGTTGGGTGAGAATTGCACG 3′), AP-PCR7 (5′ GTGGATGCGA 3′), and ERIC2 (5′ AAGTAAGTGACTGGGGTGAGCG 3′) (Barbieri et al., 2015; van Belkum et al., 1995). These primers generated distinct RAPD-PCR banding patterns for each strain, reflecting their genetic diversity.

Each 25 μL reaction contained: 2.5 μL of 10 pM each primer, 2.5 μL dNTP Mix 10 mM, 2.5 μL 10 x buffer with MgCl2, 0.15 μL TaKaRa Ex Taq (all reagents were obtained from Takara Bio Inc., Japan), and 2.0 μL of DNA. The amplification was as follows: 94°C for 4 min, 35 cycles of denaturing at 94°C for 1 min, annealing at 25°C for 1 min, extension at 72°C for 7 min, and final extension at 72°C for 7 min.

DNA fingerprint patterns were visualized on agarose gel and analyzed using ImageLab software (Bio-Rad, US). Genetic distances were calculated, and a dendrogram was constructed using the genetic distance and neighbor-joining algorithm by PyElph 1.4 free software (PyElph by Pavel A. and Vasile C., USA) (Pavel and Vasile, 2012).

2.11 Statistical analysis

Statistical analyses were performed on pseudonymized data using IBM SPSS Pro 9 Statistics (IBM, USA, Medical University of Warsaw licence) and GraphPad Prism 9 (GraphPad Software, USA). The median, maximum, and minimum values were obtained, and the distribution of the parameters was assessed using Spearman’s correlation test. Graphics were created using Microsoft 365 (Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, USA, Medical University of Warsaw licence), and the correlation matrix was visualized by plotting with R software using online tools from http://www.sthda.com/english/rsthda/correlation-matrix.php by Kassambara (n.d.). Statistical significance for correlations (two-tailed) was set at ** p < 0.01. The following criteria were used to interpret correlation strength: weak rs > 0.3, moderate rs > 0.5, strong rs > 0.7, and very strong rs > 0.9.

3 Results

3.1 Antimicrobial susceptibility pattern

During 15-month observation period, positive nasal carriage of S. aureus was confirmed in 31 women (25%). A total of 33 isolates were identified as S. aureus species by routine laboratory testing using culture, biochemical, and mass spectrometry procedures. All isolates (100%) were confirmed as MSSA via Brilliance MRSA 2 agar culture, PCR Xpert SCCmec typing, and antimicrobial susceptibility testing.

All isolates were susceptible to cefoxitin (confirming MSSA phenotype), trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, and mupirocin.

Among the nine antibiotics tested, three isolates (9.1%) were fully sensitive to all tested drugs. All 33 S. aureus isolates (100%) were susceptible to ciprofloxacin with increased exposure, requiring higher drug concentrations for inhibition. Three isolates (9.1%) were resistant to clindamycin and erythromycin but were susceptible to ciprofloxacin with increased exposure. One isolate (3.0%) was resistant to three antibiotics, gentamycin, tobramycin, and amikacin, but was susceptible to ciprofloxacin with increased exposure. The identification and antimicrobial results are presented in Figure 1.

3.2 Biofilm formation and virulence gene distribution

The exopolysaccharide synthesis phenotype, assessed using Congo Red Agar, was detected in 79% of strains (Figure 2). Among the S. aureus study group, 97% of the strains were identified as strong biofilm producers using the qualitative method of crystal violet staining and spectrophotometric measurement. The quantitative assay confirmed biofilm formation in 100% of strains (data available in repository DOI 10.6084/m9.figshare.27910680).

Figure 2
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 2. Slime production by clinical MSSA strains using the CRA method. CRA (Congo Red Agar), the test is prepared by adding 0.8 g Congo Red (Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany). Exopolysaccharide-positive results (22–26 of the clinical isolates) were described as black or almost black colonies with a rough, very dry, crystalline consistency. Exopolysaccharide-negative colonies were smooth, red, or Bordeaux red with a darkening in the center.

Molecular analysis revealed that all isolates harboured icaA, icaB, icaD, sasG, and cna, involved in adhesion and biofilm formation (Figure 1, Table 2). Some isolates also had extra genes that varied between strains. The icaC gene was found in 82% of the isolates, and the bap gene was present in 36% of the strains. Notably, all isolates lacked the virulence determinants luk gene, which encodes Panton-Valentine leukocidin (PVL) associated with necrotic skin and soft tissue infection, the smr gene, encoding chlorhexidine and quaternary ammonium resistance, and the qac gene, involved in antiseptic resistance. The sarA gene, an activator of protein A, was detected in the genomes of all S. aureus strains. The distribution of virulence factors encoding genes is presented in Figure 1.

Table 2
www.frontiersin.org

Table 2. Summary characteristics of MSSA in carriers undergoing breast reconstruction in the Polish cohort.

3.3 Association between genotypic and phenotypic traits

Strains with full antibiotic sensitivity were characterized by blaZ and aac-aph resistance genes, high ability to form biofilms, and detection of icaA-D, bap, sasG, and cna virulence genes. Only 83.3% of the 30 isolates exhibiting increased exposure to ciprofloxacin carried the icaC gene, and 10% could not produce exopolysaccharides.

All 33 S. aureus isolates possessed blaZ, sarA, icaA, icaB, icaD, and cna genes. The aac-aph gene was detected in 6% of the strains, ermA in 9%, tetM in 3%, icaD in 82%, and bap in 36%. Detailed phenotypic and genotypic characteristics and antimicrobial susceptibility results are presented in Figure 1.

The study included two cases in which two nasal swabs were obtained from the same patient, resulting in the culture of different S. aureus isolates. In all cases where multiple cultures were obtained from the same patient, the virulence profiles of the isolates were consistent, showing MSSA with sensitivity to GEN, AN, TOB, E, CLI, STX, MUP, and FOX; susceptibility with increased exposure to CIP; and the presence of blaZ, aac-aph, icaA, icaB, icaC, icaD, sarA, sasG, and cna genes, as well as the ability to form biofilms. The only exception was the presence or absence of the bap gene (Figure 1). In the first case, the clinical condition of a patient undergoing breast reconstruction changed, leading to the collection of a second isolate (isolate number 32*, bap gene absent) 7 months after the first isolation (isolate number 7*, bap gene detected). In the second case, the patient was treated in the hospital when the first isolation was cultured (isolate number 14**, bap gene absent). Approximately a month later, a subsequent positive culture of S. aureus was obtained (isolate number 23**, bap gene detected).

3.4 Genetic relationship analysis of S. aureus nasal carriage isolates based on RAPD-PCR

The genetic relatedness of S. aureus isolates was assessed by RAPD pattern with ERIC2, AP-PCR7, and AP-PCR1 primers, separately. All primers revealed low genetic diversity among the 33 MSSA isolates, as shown by similar banding patterns (Figure 3, Supplementary Figure 1).

Figure 3
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 3. Phylogenetic dendrogram based on RAPD-PCR results for S. aureus strains, according to (A) PCR-ERIC2, (B) AP-PCR1, and (C) AP-PCR7 primers. The dendrogram was generated using the neighbor-joining method with PyElph software (USA). Genetic distances are demonstrated above the branches. More than one S. aureus isolate from patient: 7*/32* and 14**/23**.

For ERIC2, amplification generated 4–8 fragments per (250 to 5,873 bp), with a polymorphic index (percentage of variable bands in RPAD profiles) of 5.2% and a genetic distance range (measure of divergence between isolates, where lower values indicate greater similarity) of 0.9 to 28.1. The isolates were clustered into five groups, with the largest separated into the next eight subgroups.

AP-PCR1 produced 5–9 fragments per isolate (250 to 5,880 bp), showing a polymorphic index of 5.5% and a genetic distance range of 0.9 to 30.6, forming six distinct groups at low genetic distance thresholds.

AP-PCR7 4–8 fragments per isolate (250 to 3,792 bp), with a p polymorphic index of 4.5% and a genetic distance range of 0.0 to 27.8, resulting in a dominant cluster of 25 isolates and five minor populations.

Double isolates from the same patients exhibited remarkable genotypic similarity. Isolates 23** and 14** from the same patient clustered together using ERIC2 and AP-PCR1. Isolates 7* and 32* in both RAPD reactions were grouped in separate clusters but exhibited low genetic distances (ERIC2 0.9, for AP-PCR1 2.7) despite differences in bap status. The low polymorphic indices and narrow genetic distance ranges confirm minimal divergence within the S. aureus population, suggesting clonal persistence in nasal carriers. Longitudinal isolates from the same patient retained near-identical genotypes over time, suggesting colonization by closely related strains.

3.5 Correlation of phenotypic factors and virulence gene detection

Spearman’s correlation analysis revealed several significant findings (Figure 4). A significant positive correlation (p < 0.01) was observed between resistance to clindamycin and resistance to erythromycin (positive correlation; rs = 1), which indicates MLSb resistance to macrolides, lincosamides, and streptogramins. A significant positive correlation (rs = 0.7) was found between the detection of the aminoglycoside resistance genes acc/aph and tobramycin, gentamicin, and amikacin resistance within the same drug group. All aminoglycosides tested showed a statistically significant positive correlation with each other (rs = 1). Among the other factors, significant (p < 0.01) but weak or moderate correlations were observed (data available in repository DOI 10.6084/m9.figshare.27910680). The correlation between ermA and S. aureus biofilm formation was weakly negative (rs = − 0.41). The ermA gene also showed a moderate positive correlation with resistance to clindamycin (rs = 0.63) and erythromycin (rs = 0.63).

Figure 4
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 4. Correlation of the phenotypic and genotypic factors of MSSA virulence. MSSA, methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus; GEN, gentamicin; AN, amikacin; TOB, tobramycin; E, erythromycin; CLI, clindamycin; icaC, bap, biofilm formation and adhesion; aac-aph, ermA, encoding resistance to aminoglycoside and erythromycin, respectively. CRA (Congo Red Agar)—exopolysaccharide synthesis phenotype; CV—biofilm staining by crystal violet and evaluated by spectrophotometric method, the mean values of absorbance for biofilm mass; CFU—biofilm cells counting, an increase in the log value above the initial concentration Log (6.0 Log CFU/mL). Spearman correlation significance (two-tailed) was assumed at the level of ** p < 0.01. The following assumptions were applied to the correlation: weak rs > 0.3, moderate rs > 0.5, strong rs > 0.7, and very strong rs > 0.9.

4 Discussion

S. aureus is a common cause of many surgical site infections (SSIs), including breast implant-associated infections in patients undergoing breast surgery (BIAIs). Clinical studies report that the occurrence of SSI is 3.5% within 90 days following mastectomy, 8.8% after mastectomy with immediate reconstruction, and up to 22% following planned reconstruction (Warren et al., 2022; Azouz et al., 2018; Szymankiewicz et al., 2023). A multicenter study from 2023 involving 5,004 patients identified preoperative S. aureus carriage, particularly in patients after mastectomy and neurosurgery, as well as those with a higher body mass index and non-removable implants, is associated with S. aureus SSIs, even postoperative bloodstream infections (BSIs) (Troeman et al., 2023). In our previous study, regarding 132 post-mastectomy breast reconstructions performed at a single oncology center in Bydgoszcz, Poland, we found a 5.3% infection rate. All infections were classified as deep incisional SSI (Szymankiewicz et al., 2023). In countries with high breast cancer rates, such as Poland, microbiological monitoring of this patient group is crucial not only for improving treatment outcomes, but also for the psychological state of patients, which may deteriorate in case of implant loss. Currently, breast cancer is the second leading cause of cancer-related deaths among women in Poland, after lung cancer. Data from the National Cancer Registry indicate that 17,500 women were diagnosed with breast cancer in Poland in 2020, with 7,500 deaths resulting from the disease (Wojciechowska et al., 2023). However, these numbers might be somewhat affected by the coronavirus disease of 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, as the number of diagnoses in 2019 was higher, at 19,620 (National Cancer Registry in Poland, 2021). This finding suggests that the observed incidence may increase in the coming years. SSIs are among the most common healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) and significantly contribute to patient morbidity and healthcare costs.

Given this situation, more complications, including microbiological complications, can occur in these patients. The most concerning scenarios involve infections caused by antibiotic-resistant pathogens such as S. aureus MRSA. A study by Goudarzi et al. found that multidrug-resistant MSSA strains were present in 84% of the examined isolates from the nasal cavity of hospital employees. Authors observed strong biofilm formation and genetic relatedness of strains, which may suggest that MSSA clonal switching to the MRSA phenotype (Goudarzi et al., 2016). However, recent studies have indicated the increasing pathogenicity of antibiotic-sensitive strains, such as S. aureus MSSA. Their virulence is attributed to various factors, such as the production of mucus and biofilms and adhesins such as MSCRAMMs. The available literature offers limited data on the diversity of MSSA strains from nasal carriages in different patient groups, including those after mastectomy. Research has shown a high rate of antibiotic resistance among MSSA strains, with 92.2% resistant to penicillin, 45.3% to erythromycin, 6.3% to clindamycin, 7.8% to gentamycin, and 18.8% to ciprofloxacin (Li et al., 2022).

Some studies have reported multidrug-resistant MSSA in up to 84% of isolates (Goudarzi et al., 2020). In one such study, a highly pathogenic MSSA serotype ST239 characterized by strong biofilm formation, high persistence, and toxicogenicity was identified (Goudarzi et al., 2020). We observed full sensitivity for the nine antibiotics in only 9.1% of all isolates. Additionally, 100% of S. aureus isolates were susceptible to ciprofloxacin with increased exposure. Single isolates showed resistance to gentamicin, amikacin, tobramycin, erythromycin, clindamycin, and had genes encoding antibiotic resistance (ermA, acc-aph).

The literature reports that MSSA strains isolated from SSIs show generally high antibiotic sensitivity, with only slight resistance observed. Reported resistance rates include erythromycin (8.33%) (Flouchi et al., 2021; Horváth et al., 2020). All isolates were 100% sensitive to ciprofloxacin, lincomycin, tobramycin, and amikacin. Among MSSA strains from general infections, resistance was more varied: erythromycin (19%), ciprofloxacin (8%), clindamycin (8%), chloramphenicol (3%), gentamicin (data not specified), trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (8%), and tetracycline (28%) (Bride et al., 2019). These findings indicate that MSSA strains can also develop antimicrobial resistance, underlining the need for further studies to determine the clinical significance of this phenomenon.

Resistance to clindamycin was strongly positively correlated with resistance to erythromycin (p < 0.01) and moderately positively correlated with detection of the ermA gene (p = 0.000), which was predictable. A strong positive correlation between the detection of the gene encoding antibiotic resistance and the corresponding antibiotic was also observed for all tested aminoglycosides and the acc-aph gene (p = 0.000). In a study by Goudarzi et al. (2016) on S. aureus nasal carriage following breast reconstruction with expanders and implants, the presence of ermC and ermA was demonstrated in 33 and 3% of cases, respectively. The present study detected these genes in 0 and 9% of cases. Literature data indicate that S. aureus strains isolated from the intestines of oncological patients, including those with breast cancer, exhibit higher resistance to β-lactams and ciprofloxacin than those isolated from non-oncological patients (Kengne et al., 2024).

A comparison between MSSA isolates responsible for bone and joint infections and those from nasal colonization revealed a similar prevalence of β-lactamase (blaZ) production. This suggests that blaZ-positive MSSA strains implicated in postoperative infections were not necessarily selected for antibiotic prophylaxis (Trouillet-Assant et al., 2016). Similarly, in the study by Ngoi et al. (2021), a blaZ-positive MSSA strain was identified as the cause of a fatal bloodstream infection. Interestingly, core genome phylogeny revealed that this MSSA strain shared a common ancestry with a European MRSA clone (Ngoi et al., 2021). This raises the question: could a similar genotypic shift occur among S. aureus strains isolated from patients undergoing breast reconstruction? This remains an important issue for further investigation.

In this study, the blaZ gene, associated with the production of β-lactamase and resistance to penicillin, was detected in all S. aureus strains. The high detection rate of blaZ may be related to the production of β-lactamases, which is often the result of acquiring the blaZ gene in an inducible manner, meaning that it is expressed in the presence of a β-lactam antibiotic. This gene is frequently located on mobile elements such as transposons, insertion sequences, and plasmids (Li et al., 2022). The literature suggests that ciprofloxacin-resistant S. aureus has a higher potential for biofilm formation (Yasir et al., 2021; Kashef et al., 2020). However, this effect was not observed in our study. All strains with 100% ciprofloxacin susceptibility and increased exposure were biofilm producers. Nonetheless, some of these strains did not produce exopolysaccharides and lacked the bap and icaC genes, but possessed the acc-aph, ermA genes, which encode resistance to aminoglycosides, erythromycin, and tetracycline, respectively. In a study conducted by McClure et al. (2017), the mupA gene was found in all MSSA strains, whereas mupB was absent, and these strains were resistant to mupirocin. The emergence of mupirocin resistance in S. aureus strains has been increasingly documented. However, in our study, none of the clinical strains showed resistance related to the mupA or mupB genes. New genes influencing this resistance in vivo should be further investigated.

Additionally, the strains tested in our study differed in their genetic profiles, including the presence of the bap gene. According to Ma et al. (2021), staphylococcal Bap proteins sense environmental signals (such as pH and Ca2+) to modulate biofilm matrices via unknown mechanisms. Understanding the role of this protein in pathogenic bacteria could provide insights into strong biofilm formation, which may be useful in the design of antibiofilm drugs (Ma et al., 2021).

In the study by Bride et al. (2019), among MSSA strains isolated from hospitalized patients, key virulence genes included those encoding Cna adhesins (detected in 47% of MSSA isolates compared to only 3% of MRSA isolates) and the lukS/F genes encoding Panton-Valentine leukocidin (identified in six isolates). Similarly, this study detected the cna gene in 100% of MSSA isolates, while the luk genes were absent.

These findings support the idea that MSSA strains should be carefully monitored due to their considerable pathogenic potential. The presence of virulence genes may be more diverse and abundant in MSSA than in MRSA strains.

In the present study, duplicate isolations from the same patients (7* and 32*, 14** and 23**) showed differences in bap gene detection. Some mutants lacked bap, which is involved in biofilm formation and primary attachment. Both of double isolates from these same women and strains from separate patients. RAPD fingerprinting of all 33 S. aureus nasal carriage isolates from patients and the construction of the dendrogram of the isolates demonstrated genus similarity by applying a 4.5–5.5% polymorphic index. Genotypic evaluation requires further analyses with an increased study group and sequencing methods. Our study has certain limitations. One of the key constraints is the small sample size and the lack of direct comparison between S. aureus genetic diversity and clinical infection rates. It is essential to confirm the genetic similarity of isolates and assess their clonal relationships through additional molecular typing methods. Future studies should involve whole genome sequencing of representative isolates from the same patients, those associated with colonization, as well as pre- and postoperative infections to enhance understanding of transmission patterns and pathogenic potential. Nonetheless, this study has notable strengths, including comprehensive phenotypic characterization of MSSA isolates. This contributes to a better understanding of the potential etiological agents involved in pre- and postoperative breast infections within the Polish breast reconstruction patient cohort.

Given this context, continuous monitoring of the virulence of S. aureus from nasal carriages in preoperative procedures may be crucial to maintaining up-to-date data on these phenotypically and genotypically variable pathogenic microorganisms.

5 Conclusion

To our knowledge, this is the first screening study conducted in Poland that examined the virulence characteristics of MSSA strains isolated from nasal carriage in oncological patients before breast implant reconstruction following mastectomy. MSSA strains typically encode adhesion (cna, icaADBC), biofilm (bap), and regulatory (sarA) genes, enhancing their potential to colonize and infect surgical sites. Importantly, the pathogenic potential of MSSA is not solely dependent on antibiotic resistance but is also driven by virulence factors. Systematic preoperative nasal screening may help prevent transmission and reduce the risk of postoperative infections of S. aureus. Further studies should focus on assessing the relationship between nasal carriage of S. aureus and the development of subsequent staphylococcal infections.

Data availability statement

The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. The names of the repository/repositories and accession number(s) can be found at: DOI 10.6084/m9.figshare.27910680.

Ethics statement

The studies were conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. Written informed consent for participation was not required from the participants or the participants’ legal guardians/next of kin because the study was conducted on clinical isolates from retrospective collection collected over June 2020 and August 2021. This study was approved by the Bioethics Committee of the Collegium Medicum UMK in Bydgoszcz (registration number KB 578/2021).

Author contributions

SJ: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Software, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. AK-B: Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Software, Validation, Writing – review & editing. TN: Resources, Writing – review & editing. AS: Data curation, Writing – review & editing. GO: Funding acquisition, Writing – review & editing. MS: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Software, Supervision, Writing – review & editing.

Funding

The author(s) declare that financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article. This research was funded by an internal grant from the Medical University of Warsaw, number 8/Z/MG/N/24.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Generative AI statement

The authors declare that no Gen AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2025.1610739/full#supplementary-material

References

Aarestrup, F. M., Agersø, Y., Ahrens, P., Jørgensen, J. C. Ø., Madsen, M., and Jensen, L. B. (2000). Antimicrobial susceptibility and presence of resistance genes in staphylococci from poultry. Vet. Microbiol. 74, 353–364. doi: 10.1016/S0378-1135(00)00197-8

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Al-Amery, K., Elhariri, M., Elsayed, A., El-Moghazy, G., Elhelw, R., El-Mahallawy, H., et al. (2019). Vancomycin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolated from camel meat and slaughterhouse workers in Egypt. Antimicrob. Resist. Infect. Control 8:129. doi: 10.1186/s13756-019-0585-4

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Arciola, C. R., Collamati, S., Donati, E., and Montanaro, L. (2001). A rapid PCR method for the detection of slime-producing strains of Staphylococcus epidermidis and S. aureus in periprosthesis infections. Diagn. Mol. Pathol. 10, 130–137. doi: 10.1097/00019606-200106000-00010

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Asai, S., Takahashi, N., Kishimoto, K., Suzuki, M., Ohashi, Y., Terabe, K., et al. (2022). Increased prevalence of Staphylococcus aureus nasal carriage in rheumatoid arthritis patients with moderate/high disease activity. J. Orthop. Sci. 28, 1400–1406. doi: 10.1016/j.jos.2022.09.014

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Azimian, A., Asghar Havaei, S., Fazeli, H., Naderi, M., Ghazvini, K., Mirab Samiee, S., et al. (2012). Genetic analysis of a vancomycin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strain isolated in Iran. mBio 3:e00442-12. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00442-12

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Azouz, V., Mirhaidari, S., and Wagner, D. S. (2018). Defining infection in breast reconstruction: a literature review. Ann. Plast. Surg. 80, 587–591. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000001336

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Baker, J. E., Seitz, A. P., Boudreau, R. M., Skinner, M. J., Beydoun, A., Kaval, N., et al. (2020). Doxycycline-coated silicone breast implants reduce acute surgical-site infection and inflammation. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 146, 1029–1041. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000007277

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Barbieri, R., Pesce, M., Franchelli, S., Baldelli, I., de Maria, A., and Marchese, A. (2015). Phenotypic and genotypic characterization of staphylococci causing breast peri-implant infections in oncologic patients. BMC Microbiol. 15:26. doi: 10.1186/s12866-015-0368-x

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Bissong, M. E. A., and Ateba, C. N. (2020). Genotypic and phenotypic evaluation of biofilm production and antimicrobial resistance in Staphylococcus aureus isolated from Milk, north West Province, South Africa. Antibiotics (Basel) 9:156. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics9040156

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Bride, L. L., Pereira, M. F., Barbosa, M. C., Silva, N. C., Klein, N. M., Nascimento, T. C., et al. (2019). Differences in resistance profiles and virulence genes among methicillin-resistant and methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus of different lineages at a public tertiary hospital. Rev. Soc. Bras. Med. Trop. 52:e20190095. doi: 10.1590/0037-8682-0095-2019

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Cavalcante, F. S., Saintive, S., Carvalho Ferreira, D., Rocha Silva, A. B., Guimarães, L. C., Braga, B. S., et al. (2021). Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus from infected skin lesions present several virulence genes and are associated with the CC30 in Brazilian children with atopic dermatitis. Virulence 12, 260–269. doi: 10.1080/21505594.2020.1869484

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Cucarella, C., Solano, C., Valle, J., Amorena, B., Lasa, I., and Penadés, J. R. (2001). Bap, a Staphylococcus aureus surface protein involved in biofilm formation. J. Bacteriol. 183, 2888–2896. doi: 10.1128/JB.183.9.2888-2896.2001

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Datta, R., and Huang, S. S. (2008). Risk of infection and death due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in long-term carriers. Clin. Infect. Dis. 47, 176–181. doi: 10.1086/589241

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Dong, Q., Liu, Y., Li, W., Chen, M., Li, W., Wang, X., et al. (2020). Phenotypic and molecular characteristics of community-associated Staphylococcus aureus infection in neonates. Infect. Drug Resist. 13, 4589–4600. doi: 10.2147/IDR.S284781

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Duran Ramirez, J. M., Gomez, J., Hanson, B. M., Isa, T., Myckatyn, T. M., and Walker, J. N. (2023). Staphylococcus aureus breast implant infection isolates display recalcitrance to antibiotic pocket irrigants. Microbiol. Spectr. 11:e0288422. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.02884-22

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Duran Ramirez, J. M., Gomez, J., Hanson, B. M., Isa, T., Myckatyn, T. M., and Marchese, A. (2022). Staphylococcus aureus breast implant infection isolates display recalcitrance to antibiotic pocket Irrigants. Microbiol. Spectr. :e0288422.

Google Scholar

Flouchi, R., Elmniai, A., Hibatallah, A., Fahsi, K., Touzani, I., and Fikri-Benbrahim, K. (2021). The relationship between nasal carriage of Staphylococcus aureus and surgical site infections in a Hospital Center in Morocco. Int. J. Microbiol. 2021:5585588. doi: 10.1155/2021/5585588

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Franchelli, S., Pesce, M., Baldelli, I., Marchese, A., Santi, P., and de Maria, A. (2018). Analysis of clinical management of infected breast implants and of factors associated to successful breast pocket salvage in infections occurring after breast reconstruction. Int. J. Infect. Dis. 71, 67–72. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2018.03.019

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Freeman, D. J., Falkiner, F. R., and Keane, C. T. (1989). New method for detecting slime production by coagulase negative staphylococci. J. Clin. Pathol. 42, 872–874. doi: 10.1136/jcp.42.8.872

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Girijan, S. K., and Pillai, D. (2021). Identification and characterization of vancomycin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in hospital wastewaters: evidence of horizontal spread of antimicrobial resistance. J. Water Health 19, 785–795. doi: 10.2166/wh.2021.117

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Gofstein-Hayuth, D., Fliss, E., Barnea, Y., Legarda, C., Bracha, G., Lerner, A., et al. (2023). Comparing the efficacy of antimicrobial pocket-irrigation protocols in an in vivo breast implant infection model. J. Plast. Reconstr. Aesthet. Surg. 85, 165–173. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2023.06.062

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Goudarzi, H., Goudarzi, M., Sabzehali, F., Fazeli, M., and Salimi Chirani, A. (2020). Genetic analysis of methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus clinical isolates: high prevalence of multidrug-resistant ST239 with strong biofilm-production ability. J. Clin. Lab. Anal. 34:e23494. doi: 10.1002/jcla.23494

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Goudarzi, G., Tahmasbi, F., Anbari, K., and Ghafarzadeh, M. (2016). Distribution of genes encoding resistance to macrolides among staphylococci isolated from the nasal cavity of hospital employees in Khorramabad, Iran. Iran. Red Crescent Med. J. 18:e25701. doi: 10.5812/ircmj.25701

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Gowrishankar, S., Kamaladevi, A., Balamurugan, K., and Pandian, S. K. (2016). In vitro and in vivo biofilm characterization of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus from patients associated with pharyngitis infection. Biomed. Res. Int. 2016:1289157. doi: 10.1155/2016/1289157

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Hart, A., Desai, K., Yoo, J., and Losken, A. (2017). Incidence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) carrier status in patients undergoing post-mastectomy breast reconstruction. Aesthet. Surg. J. 37, 35–43. doi: 10.1093/asj/sjw108

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Hemmingsen, M. N., Bennedsen, A. K., Kullab, R. B., Weltz, T. K., Larsen, A., Ørholt, M., et al. (2024). Antibiotic implant irrigation and deep infection: a retrospective study of 1508 patients undergoing breast reconstruction with implants. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 154, 5–13. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000010869

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Horváth, A., Dobay, O., Sahin-Tóth, J., Juhász, E., Pongrácz, J., Iván, M., et al. (2020). Characterisation of antibiotic resistance, virulence, clonality and mortality in MRSA and MSSA bloodstream infections at a tertiary-level hospital in Hungary: a 6-year retrospective study. Ann. Clin. Microbiol. Antimicrob. 19:17. doi: 10.1186/s12941-020-00357-z

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Humphreys, H., Becker, K., Dohmen, P. M., Petrosillo, N., Spencer, M., van Rijen, M., et al. (2016). Staphylococcus aureus and surgical site infections: benefits of screening and decolonization before surgery. J. Hosp. Infect. 94, 295–304. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2016.06.011

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Jarraud, S., Mougel, C., Thioulouse, J., Lina, G., Meugnier, H., Forey, F., et al. (2002). Relationships between Staphylococcus aureus genetic background, virulence factors, agr groups (alleles), and human disease. Infect. Immun. 70, 631–641. doi: 10.1128/IAI.70.2.631-641.2002

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Kashef, M. T., Saleh, N. M., Assar, N. H., and Ramadan, M. A. (2020). The antimicrobial activity of ciprofloxacin-loaded Niosomes against ciprofloxacin-resistant and biofilm-forming Staphylococcus aureus. Infect. Drug Resist. 13, 1619–1629. doi: 10.2147/IDR.S249628

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Kassambara, A. Statistical tools for high-throughput data analysis. (n. d.). Available online at: http://www.sthda.com/english/rsthda/correlation-matrix.php#google_vignette (Accessed November 24, 2024).

Google Scholar

Kathju, A., Nistico, L., and Stoodley, P. (2024). Bacterial biofilm on tissue expander and acellular dermal graft after breast reconstruction. Surg. Infect. 25, 632–635. doi: 10.1089/sur.2024.156

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Kengne, M. F., Mbaveng, A. T., and Kuete, V. (2024). Antibiotic resistance profile of Staphylococcus aureus in Cancer patients at Laquintinie Hospital in Douala, Littoral region, Cameroon. Biomed Res. Int. 2024:5859068. doi: 10.1155/2024/5859068

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Khudor, M. H., and Idbeis, H. I. (2022). Detection of intracellular adhesion gene (icaA and icaD) and biofilm formation Staphylococcus aureus isolates from mastitis milk of sheep and goat. Basrah J. Vet. Res. 18, 306–327. doi: 10.23975/bjvetr.2022.172828

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Kouidhi, B., Zmantar, T., Hentati, H., and Bakhrouf, A. (2010). Cell surface hydrophobicity, biofilm formation, adhesives properties and molecular detection of adhesins genes in Staphylococcus aureus associated to dental caries. Microb. Pathog. 49, 14–22. doi: 10.1016/j.micpath.2010.03.007

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Labrecque, S., Shah, S., Fergus, D., and Parry, M. F. (2023). Mupirocin susceptibility of staphylococci 2022: is it time for a change in MRSA decolonization protocols? Am. J. Infect. Control 51, 725–728. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2022.08.025

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Lemaignen, A., Armand-Lefevre, L., Birgand, G., Mabileau, G., Lolom, I., Ghodbane, W., et al. (2018). Thirteen-year experience with universal Staphylococcus aureus nasal decolonization prior to cardiac surgery: a quasi-experimental study. J. Hosp. Infect. 100, 322–328. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2018.04.023

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Li, Y., Tang, Y., Jiang, Z., Wang, Z., Li, Q., and Jiao, X. (2022). Molecular characterization of methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus from the intestinal tracts of adult patients in China. Pathogens 11:978. doi: 10.3390/pathogens11090978

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Lina, G., Quaglia, A., Reverdy, M. E., Leclercq, R., Vandenesch, F., and Etienne, J. (1999). Distribution of genes encoding resistance to macrolides, lincosamides, and streptogramins among staphylococci. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 43, 1062–1066. doi: 10.1128/AAC.43.5.1062

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Lisa, A. V. E., Zeneli, F., Mazzucco, M., Barbieri, B., Rietjens, M., Lissidini, G., et al. (2024). Microbiology of periprosthetic infections following implant-based breast reconstruction surgery: a multicentric retrospective study. Front. Surg. 11:1477023. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2024.1477023

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Lohmeyer, J. A., Jakob, V. L., Keck, M., and Wittig, K. (2021). Antibiotic treatment and prophylaxis of periprosthetic infections: evaluation of 666 consecutive breast implant removals. J. Plast. Reconstr. Aesthet. Surg. 74, 1486–1494. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2020.11.005

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Long, D. R., Bryson-Cahn, C., Waalkes, A., Holmes, E. A., Penewit, K., Tavolaro, C., et al. (2024). Contribution of the patient microbiome to surgical site infection and antibiotic prophylaxis failure in spine surgery. Sci. Transl. Med. 16:eadk8222. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.adk8222

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Ma, J., Cheng, X., Xu, Z., Zhang, Y., Valle, J., Fan, S., et al. (2021). Structural mechanism for modulation of functional amyloid and biofilm formation by staphylococcal bap protein switch. EMBO J. 40:e107500. doi: 10.15252/embj.2020107500

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Maharjan, M., Sah, A. K., Pyakurel, S., Thapa, S., Maharjan, S., Adhikari, N., et al. (2021). Molecular confirmation of vancomycin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus with vanA gene from a Hospital in Kathmandu. Int. J. Microbiol. 2021:3847347. doi: 10.1155/2021/3847347

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

McClure, J. A., Conly, J. M., Lau, V., Elsayed, S., Louie, T., Hutchins, W., et al. (2006). Novel multiplex PCR assay for detection of the staphylococcal virulence marker Panton-valentine leukocidin genes and simultaneous discrimination of methicillin-susceptible from -resistant staphylococci. J. Clin. Microbiol. 44, 1141–1144. doi: 10.1128/JCM.44.3.1141-1144.2006

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

McClure, J. A., Zaal DeLongchamp, J., Conly, J. M., and Zhang, K. (2017). Novel multiplex PCR assay for detection of chlorhexidine-quaternary ammonium, mupirocin, and methicillin resistance genes, with simultaneous discrimination of Staphylococcus aureus from coagulase-negative staphylococci. J. Clin. Microbiol. 55, 1857–1864. doi: 10.1128/JCM.02488-16

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Michalopoulos, N. V., Frountzas, M., Karathanasis, P., Theodoropoulos, C., Kolia, A., Zografos, C. G., et al. (2022). Implant infections after breast reconstruction surgery following mastectomy: experience from a Greek breast unit. Breast Dis. 41, 37–44. doi: 10.3233/BD-201077

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Mkhize, S., Amoako, D. G., Shobo, C. O., Zishiri, O. T., and Bester, L. A. (2021). Genotypic and phenotypic characterizations of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) on frequently touched sites from public hospitals in South Africa. Int. J. Microbiol. 2021:6011045. doi: 10.1155/2021/6011045

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Montanaro, L., Renata Arciola, C., Baldassarri, L., and Borsetti, E. (1999). Presence and expression of collagen adhesin gene (cna) and slime production in Staphylococcus aureus strains from orthopaedic prosthesis infections. Biomaterials 20, 1945–1949. doi: 10.1016/S0142-9612(99)00099-X

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Mukhtar, R. A., Throckmorton, A. D., Alvarado, M. D., Ewing, C. A., Esserman, L. J., Chiu, C., et al. (2009). Bacteriologic features of surgical site infections following breast surgery. Am. J. Surg. 198, 529–531. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2009.06.006

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Nahabedian, M. Y., Tsangaris, T., Momen, B., and Manson, P. N. (2003). Infectious complications following breast reconstruction with expanders and implants. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 112, 467–476. doi: 10.1097/01.PRS.0000070727.02992.54

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

National Cancer Registry in Poland. (2021). Available online at: https://onkologia.org.pl/pl (Accessed November 11, 2024).

Google Scholar

Ngoi, S. T., Niek, W. K., Lee, Y. W., AbuBakar, S., and Teh, C. S. J. (2021). Genomic analysis revealed a novel genotype of methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus isolated from a fatal sepsis case in dengue patient. Sci. Rep. 11:4228. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-83661-8

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Noguchi, N., Suwa, J., Narui, K., Sasatsu, M., Ito, T., Hiramatsu, K., et al. (2005). Susceptibilities to antiseptic agents and distribution of antiseptic-resistance genes qacA/B and smr of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolated in Asia during 1998 and 1999. J. Med. Microbiol. 54, 557–565. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.45902-0

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Papa, G., Frasca, A., Renzi, N., Stocco, C., Pizzolato, G., Ramella, V., et al. (2021). Protocol for prevention and monitoring of surgical site infections in implant-based breast reconstruction: preliminary results. Medicina (Kaunas) 57:151. doi: 10.3390/medicina57020151

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Parvin, M. S., Ali, M. Y., Talukder, S., Nahar, A., Chowdhury, E. H., Rahman, M. T., et al. (2021). Prevalence and multidrug resistance pattern of methicillin Resistant S. aureus isolated from frozen chicken meat in Bangladesh. Microorganisms 9:636. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms9030636

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Pavel, A. B., and Vasile, C. I. (2012). PyElph – a software tool for gel images analysis and phylogenetics. BMC Bioinformatics 13:9. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-13-9

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Pinto, J. B., Rossatto, F. C. P., Martins, P. D., and Frazzon, A. P. G. (2015). Genetic relationships and virulence factors in Staphylococcus aureus isolated from raw poultry in South Brazil. Ann. Microbiol. 65, 1933–1940. doi: 10.1007/s13213-014-1031-8

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Reiter, K. C., Villa, B., Paim, T. G. S., Sambrano, G. E., de Oliveira, C. F., and d’Azevedo, P. A. (2012). Enhancement of antistaphylococcal activities of six antimicrobials against sasG-negative methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus: an in vitro biofilm model. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 74, 101–105. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2012.05.034

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Rouquette, S., Cherrière, F., Vagneur, A., Godey, F., Sun, S., Jolivet-Gougeon, A., et al. (2015). Screening for carriage of Staphylococcus aureus prior to mammary reconstruction in the prevention of surgical site infection. Ann. Chir. Plast. Esthet. 60, 490–494. doi: 10.1016/j.anplas.2015.07.007

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Rozgonyi, F., Kocsis, E., Kristóf, K., and Nagy, K. (2007). Is MRSA more virulent than MSSA? Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 13, 843–845. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2007.01780.x

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Sakr, A., Brégeon, F., Rolain, J. M., and Blin, O. (2019). Staphylococcus aureus nasal decolonization strategies: a review. Expert Rev. Anti-Infect. Ther. 17, 327–340. doi: 10.1080/14787210.2019.1604220

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Seah, C., Alexander, D. C., Louie, L., Simor, A., Low, D. E., Longtin, J., et al. (2012). MupB, a new high-level mupirocin resistance mechanism in Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 56, 1916–1920. doi: 10.1128/AAC.05325-11

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Shortle, D. (1983). A genetic system for analysis of staphylococcal nuclease. Gene 22, 181–189. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(83)90102-6

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Stepanovic, S., Vukovic, D., Dakic, I., Savic, B., and Svabic-Vlahovic, M. (2000). A modified microtiter-plate test for quantification of staphylococcal biofilm formation. J. Microbiol. Methods 40, 175–179. doi: 10.1016/S0167-7012(00)00122-6

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Szymankiewicz, M., Jarzynka, S., Koryszewska-Bagińska, A., and Nowikiewicz, T. (2023). The impact of nasal Staphylococcus aureus carriage on surgical-site infections after immediate breast reconstruction: risk factors and biofilm formation potential. Med. Sci. Monit. 29:e940898. doi: 10.12659/MSM.940898

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

The European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing. (2025) Breakpoint tables for interpretation of MICs and zone diameters. In version 15.0 2025. Stockholm, Sweden, Available at: https://www.eucast.org/clinical_breakpoints (Accessed January 2025).

Google Scholar

Tobias, T., Kruchevsky, D., Ullmann, Y., Berger, J., Arraf, M., and Eldor, L. (2023). Implant-based breast reconstruction infections: the importance of recognizing local pathogens. Isr. Med. Assoc. J. 25, 96–100

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

Tormo, M. A., Knecht, E., Götz, F., Lasa, I., and Penadés, J. R. (2005). Bap-dependent biofilm formation by pathogenic species of Staphylococcus: evidence of horizontal gene transfer? Microbiology (Reading) 151, 2465–2475. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.27865-0

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Troeman, D. P. R., Hazard, D., Timbermont, L., Malhotra-Kumar, S., van Werkhoven, C. H., Wolkewitz, M., et al. (2023). Postoperative Staphylococcus aureus infections in patients with and without preoperative colonization. JAMA Netw. Open 6:e2339793. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.39793

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Trouillet-Assant, S., Valour, F., Mouton, W., Martins-Simões, P., Lustig, S., Laurent, F., et al. (2016). Methicillin-susceptible strains responsible for postoperative orthopedic infection are not selected by the use of cefazolin in prophylaxis. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 84, 266–267. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2015.11.013

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Tsang, S. T. J., McHugh, M. P., Guerendiain, D., Gwynne, P. J., Boyd, J., Simpson, A. H. R. W., et al. (2018). Underestimation of Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA and MSSA) carriage associated with standard culturing techniques: one third of carriers missed. Bone Joint Res. 7, 79–84. doi: 10.1302/2046-3758.71.BJR-2017-0175.R1

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Tu, H., Xu, F., Cheng, Y., Pan, Q., Cai, X., Wang, S., et al. (2021). Proteomic profiling of the endogenous peptides of MRSA and MSSA. PeerJ 9:e12508. doi: 10.7717/peerj.12508

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

van Belkum, A., Kluytmans, J., van Leeuwen, W., Bax, R., Quint, W., Peters, E., et al. (1995). Multicenter evaluation of arbitrarily primed PCR for typing of Staphylococcus aureus strains. J. Clin. Microbiol. 33, 1537–1547. doi: 10.1128/jcm.33.6.1537-1547.1995

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Vancraeynest, D., Hermans, K., and Haesebrouck, F. (2004). Genotypic and phenotypic screening of high and low virulence Staphylococcus aureus isolates from rabbits for biofilm formation and MSCRAMMs. Vet. Microbiol. 103, 241–247. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2004.09.002

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Vasudevan, P., Nair, M. K. M., Annamalai, T., and Venkitanarayanan, K. S. (2003). Phenotypic and genotypic characterization of bovine mastitis isolates of Staphylococcus aureus for biofilm formation. Vet. Microbiol. 92, 179–185. doi: 10.1016/S0378-1135(02)00360-7

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Vautor, E., Abadie, G., Pont, A., and Thiery, R. (2008). Evaluation of the presence of the bap gene in Staphylococcus aureus isolates recovered from human and animals species. Vet. Microbiol. 127, 407–411. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2007.08.018

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Vazquez-Rosas, G. J., Merida-Vieyra, J., Aparicio-Ozores, G., Lara-Hernandez, A., de Colsa, A., and Aquino-Andrade, A. (2021). Molecular characterization of Staphylococcus aureus obtained from blood cultures of Paediatric patients treated in a tertiary Care Hospital in Mexico. Infect. Drug Resist. 14, 1545–1556. doi: 10.2147/IDR.S302416

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Viola, G. M., Raad, I. I., and Rolston, K. V. (2014). Breast tissue expander-related infections: perioperative antimicrobial regimens. Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol. 35, 75–81. doi: 10.1086/674390

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Warren, D. K., Peacock, K. M., Nickel, K. B., Fraser, V. J., and Olsen, M. A. for the CDC Prevention Epicenter Program (2022). Postdischarge prophylactic antibiotics following mastectomy with and without breast reconstruction. Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol. 43, 1382–1388. doi: 10.1017/ice.2021.400

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Wenzel, R. P. (2019). Surgical site infections and the microbiome: an updated perspective. Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol. 40, 590–596. doi: 10.1017/ice.2018.363

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Wojciechowska, U., Barańska, K., Miklewska, M., and Didkowska, J. A. (2023). Cancer incidence and mortality in Poland in 2020. J. Oncol. Nowotwory. 73, 129–145. doi: 10.5603/NJO.2023.0026

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Yasir, M., Dutta, D., and Willcox, M. D. P. (2021). Enhancement of Antibiofilm activity of ciprofloxacin against Staphylococcus aureus by Administration of Antimicrobial Peptides. Antibiotics 10:1159. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics10101159

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhang, K., Sparling, J., Chow, B. L., Elsayed, S., Hussain, Z., Church, D. L., et al. (2004). New quadriplex PCR assay for detection of methicillin and mupirocin resistance and simultaneous discrimination of Staphylococcus aureus from coagulase-negative staphylococci. J. Clin. Microbiol. 42, 4947–4955. doi: 10.1128/JCM.42.11.4947-4955.2004

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhao, N., Khamash, D. F., Koh, H., Voskertchian, A., Egbert, E., Mongodin, E. F., et al. (2021). Low diversity in nasal microbiome associated with Staphylococcus aureus colonization and bloodstream infections in hospitalized neonates. Open Forum Infect. Dis. 8:ofab475. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofab475

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA), screening nasal swabs, breast reconstruction, adhesion genes, antibiotic-resistant genes, virulence factors, biofilm formation, exopolysaccharide production

Citation: Jarzynka S, Koryszewska-Bagińska A, Nowikiewicz T, Szczepańska A, Olędzka G and Szymankiewicz M (2025) Staphylococcus aureus nasal carriage before breast reconstruction: antibiotic resistance, biofilm formation, and virulence genes—a single center in vitro observation. Front. Microbiol. 16:1610739. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2025.1610739

Received: 14 April 2025; Accepted: 02 June 2025;
Published: 19 June 2025.

Edited by:

Samira Tarashi, Pasteur Institute of Iran (PII), Iran

Reviewed by:

Juan Pablo Escalera-Antezana, CIES Salud Sexual y Salud Reproducitva, Bolivia
Katarzyna Garbacz, Medical University of Gdansk, Poland

Copyright © 2025 Jarzynka, Koryszewska-Bagińska, Nowikiewicz, Szczepańska, Olędzka and Szymankiewicz. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Maria Szymankiewicz, c3p5bWFua2lld2ljem1AY28uYnlkZ29zemN6LnBs

These authors have contributed equally to this work

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.