Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Microbiol.

Sec. Microbe and Virus Interactions with Plants

Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2025.1612012

This article is part of the Research TopicMetagenomic Insights into Microbial Communities in Fruits and Vegetable PlantsView all 5 articles

Indirect improvement of pepino (Solanum muricatum) productivity via nitrogen fertilizer-mediated microbial and enzymatic stimulation 1

Provisionally accepted
Bingbing  SuBingbing Su1Huaidi  PeiHuaidi Pei2Shi-Weng  LiShi-Weng Li1*Zhongming  MaZhongming Ma3*Yuliang  ChenYuliang Chen2Yubin  LiYubin Li4Liguang  WangLiguang Wang2Zhongwang  LiZhongwang Li2bingbing  subingbing su1
  • 1Lanzhou Jiaotong University, Lanzhou, China
  • 2Institute of biotechnology, Gansu Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Lanzhou, China
  • 3Gansu Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Lanzhou, Gansu Province, China
  • 4Institute of Forest Fruits and Flowers, Gansu Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Lanzhou, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

To meet the both escalating production requirements of pepino cultivation and maintaining soil sustainable development through precise exploration of chemical fertilizer input amounts. A 5-month greenhouse experiment evaluated how varying nitrogen fertilization rates (0, 75, 150, 225, and 300 kg•ha⁻¹) modulate soil biochemical properties and their subsequent effects on pepino productivity and fruit nutrients components. Our study revealed that the N300 treatment maximized vegetative growth (plant height, leaf and fruit dry biomass), as well as plant nitrogen and fruit calcium contents, but significantly reduced root-to-shoot ratio, vitamin C, and soluble sugars versus N0. N225 optimally balanced productivity and nutrition, and elevated nitrogen use efficiency (34.13%), per plant yield (45.60%), fruit protein (142.68%) and calcium (32.72%). N150 showed intermediate benefits with peak stem dry biomass and sugar content, while N75 provided only marginal growth stimulation. Moreover, nitrogen fertilization differentially modified soil biochemical properties, N300 treatment markedly enhanced urease (143.24%), nitrate reductase (99.38%), and sucrase (23.87%) activities, while increasing the relative abundances of Nitrosomonas and Ensifer, though at the cost of reduced pH, nitrite reductase, and alkaline phosphatase activities.N225 treatment improved microbial ACE and Chao indexes, and enriched the Opitutus, but depleted available nitrogen (-29.53%) and available potassium (-27.90%). N150 boosted the relative abundance of Bacillus (45.15%), Arthrobacter (72.67%), Sphingomonas (57.55%), and enriched the Mesorhizobium. N75 had slightly positive effects on core genera and nitrogen cycling microorganism.Therefore, we recommend nitrogen application rates of 150~225 kg•ha⁻¹ to optimize pepino production. Moreover, the PLS analysis illustrated that nitrogen fertilization indirectly enhanced pepino productivity by stimulating urease and nitrate reductase activities, and enriching functional microbiota (Nitrosomonas, Opitutus, Ensifer, and Mesorhizobium) to facilitate soil nutrient mobilization (soil total nitrogen, available nitrogen and available potassium) for plant growth. Notably, fruit nutrients components (protein and calcium contents) were directly modulated by nitrogen application amounts.

Keywords: Nitrogen fertilizer inputs, soil biochemical properties, Nitrogen fertilizer use efficiency, Soil microorganism, Ginseng fruit (Solanum muricatum Aiton)

Received: 15 Apr 2025; Accepted: 17 Jul 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Su, Pei, Li, Ma, Chen, Li, Wang, Li and su. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence:
Shi-Weng Li, Lanzhou Jiaotong University, Lanzhou, China
Zhongming Ma, Gansu Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Lanzhou, Gansu Province, China

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.