ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Microbiol.

Sec. Terrestrial Microbiology

Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2025.1615142

This article is part of the Research TopicSoil Microbiome and Agroecosystem MultifunctionalityView all 4 articles

Mitigating gaseous nitrogen emissions in cotton fields through green manure and reduced nitrogen fertilization

Provisionally accepted
Ru  MaRu Ma1Zhang  ZhengguiZhang Zhenggui2Jian  WangJian Wang2Yingchun  HanYingchun Han2Ke  LiKe Li1Mengyao  HouMengyao Hou1Yaping  LeiYaping Lei2Shiwu  XiongShiwu Xiong2Beifang  YangBeifang Yang2Xiaoyu  ZhiXiaoyu Zhi2Yahui  JiaoYahui Jiao2Tao  LinTao Lin3*Shijie  ZhangShijie Zhang1*Yabing  LiYabing Li1,2*
  • 1Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
  • 2Institute of Cotton Research, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Anyang, Henan Province, China
  • 3Xinjiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Urumqi, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Integrating green manure with reduced nitrogen (N) fertilization is a promising strategy to mitigate N emissions in intensive cotton cultivation, however, the underlying mechanisms remain poorly understood. This study investigated the effects of three green manure incorporation patterns—no green manure (NG), Orychophragmus violaceus (OVG), and Vicia villosa (VVG)—combined with four N reduction levels (100%, 50%, 25%, and conventional) on gaseous N emissions (NH3 and N2O), soil physicochemical properties, and bacterial community characteristics using a cotton field experiment in the Yellow River Basin. Results showed that OVG incorporation with 25% N reduction (N2 treatment) significantly reduced total gaseous N emissions by 36.07% on average during the cotton growth period, reducing NH3 and N2O emissions by 13.31%-54.11% and 32.25%-68.77%, respectively, compared with N2 application without OVG. OVG application also increased the relative abundance of Proteobacteria (28.10%), enhanced heterogeneous selection in bacterial community assembly (200%), and increased the complexity of co-occurrence networks, compared with NG. Compared with conventional N fertilization (N3 treatment), ≥50% N reduction significantly lowered NH3 (>25.51%) and N2O (>32.76%) emissions, reduced the relative abundance of Acidobacteria (-20.23%), simplified co-occurrence networks, and increased homogeneous selection in bacterial assembly (50.00%). Integrating green manure with 25% N reduction substantially reduced gaseous N emissions, which was associated with the enhanced microbial biomass carbon (MBC) and facilitated recruitment of key bacterial taxa (e.g., Sphingosinicella, Azohydromonas, Phototrophicus) within the microbial co-occurrence network. These findings provide insight into how green manure application coupled with N reduction can mitigate gaseous N losses and reshape soil microbial ecology, offering a theoretical basis for sustainable nutrient management during cotton production.

Keywords: N2O emissions, NH3 volatilization, Green manure, N fertilizer reduction, bacterial keystone taxa N2O emissions, Bacterial keystone taxa

Received: 20 Apr 2025; Accepted: 16 May 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Ma, Zhenggui, Wang, Han, Li, Hou, Lei, Xiong, Yang, Zhi, Jiao, Lin, Zhang and Li. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence:
Tao Lin, Xinjiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Urumqi, 830000, China
Shijie Zhang, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
Yabing Li, Institute of Cotton Research, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Anyang, 455000, Henan Province, China

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.