Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Microbiol.

Sec. Microbial Symbioses

Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2025.1616528

Comparison of extracellular vesicles carrying bacterial DNA in urine and serum from a Korean population

Provisionally accepted
  • 1Interdisciplinary Program of Bioinformatics, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
  • 2Institute of Health and Environment, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
  • 3Institute for Biomaterials, Korea University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
  • 4Department of Applied Statistics, Gachon University, Seongnam, Republic of Korea
  • 5Department of Food and Nutrition, Faculty of Food Science and Technology, College of Biotechnology and Natural Resources, Chung-Ang University, Anseong, Gyeonggi, Republic of Korea
  • 6Institute of Human Genomic Study, College of Medicine, Korea University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
  • 7Division of Zoonotic and Vector Borne Diseases Research, Center for Infectious Disease Research, National Institute of Health, Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency, Cheongju, Republic of Korea
  • 8Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Bacteria-derived extracellular vesicles (BEVs) are emerging as key biomarkers of hostmicrobiota interactions. However, little is known about how BEV profiles differ across different biofluids or how these differences relate to clinical phenotypes. We aimed to examine the BEV distribution and site-specific and shared associations with host phenotypes, and evaluated the clinical relevance of microbial distance between sampling sites. In this study, we profiled BEVs using 16S rRNA sequencing of urine and serum samples from middle-aged and older Koreans (n = 2,827). We compared the alpha and beta diversities between the two biofluids, and assessed their relative abundances and associations with host anthropometric measurements, blood tests, and dietary nutrient intake. We also calculated the distances between urine and serum BEV compositions and assessed their clinical and metabolic implications. The results revealed that the urine BEVs exhibited higher alpha diversity than the serum BEVs, as well as stronger associations with dietary nutrient intake, particularly sugar, and with anthropometric measures such as waist circumference. The correlations between the urine and serum BEV compositions were generally low, emphasizing their distinct microbial profiles. Notably, individuals with shorter urine-serum BEV composition distances had higher waist-to-hip and sugar-to-fat ratios. This study provides a comprehensive comparison of urinary and serum BEVs, revealing the differences in microbial composition and associations with host phenotypes. In particular, urine BEVs showed stronger associations with dietary and metabolic factors, underscoring their potential utility as non-invasive biomarkers for metabolic health.

Keywords: Extracellular vesicle, Urine, Serum, gut dysbiosis, microbiome

Received: 24 Apr 2025; Accepted: 10 Jul 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Yie, Kim, Park, Kim, Shin, Lee, Shin, Lee and Won. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence:
Kwang Jun Lee, Division of Zoonotic and Vector Borne Diseases Research, Center for Infectious Disease Research, National Institute of Health, Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency, Cheongju, Republic of Korea
Sungho Won, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.