ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Microbiol.
Sec. Microorganisms in Vertebrate Digestive Systems
Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2025.1625167
This article is part of the Research TopicNew Horizons in Gut Microbiome Research for Enhancing Livestock ProductivityView all 8 articles
Impact of Multi-strain Probiotics Supplementation on Growth, Immune Responses and Physiological Traits in Backyard Poultry of Andaman and Nicobar Islands, India
Provisionally accepted- 1Division of Animal Science, ICAR-Central Island Agricultural Research Institute, Port Blair, India
- 2Department of Veterinary Microbiology, West Bengal University of Animal and Fishery Sciences (W.B.U.A.F.S), Kolkata, India
- 3Institute of Animal Hygiene and Veterinary Public Health, Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany
- 4Division of Biochemistry, ICMR-Regional Medical Research Centre, Port Blair, India
- 5Department of Veterinary Pathology, West Bengal University of Animal and Fishery Sciences (W.B.U.A.F.S), Kolkata, India
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Probiotics are important for gut microbial health by its action mechanism and modulation of host immune system. No prior research has been conducted in Andaman and Nicobar Islands, India to elucidate the direct influence of probiotics on overall health and immunity of rural backyard poultry. To explore an efficient alternative to commercially available antibiotics, a commercial multi-strain probiotic (Bifilac R ) was evaluated in Vanaraja, a popular backyard poultry variety reared in the islands. 120 newly hatched Vanaraja chicks were chosen, 30 chicks were randomly allocated into 4 different groups for 60 days. In negative control (NC), chicks were fed only basal diet. For the positive control (PC), chicks were fed with basal diet + antibiotic growth promoter (AGP-Tetracycline). Test group (T1) was fed basal diet +0.1% of Bifilac R . The test group (T2) was fed basal diet +0.3% of Bifilac R . The results showed that the mean body weight of chicks supplemented with 0.1% (T1) and 0.3% (T2) multi-strain probiotics was significantly higher (p≤0.05) than that of control groups. A significant increase in feed conversion ratio (FCR) was observed among test groups at different time intervals. Both T1 and T2 expressed significant changes (p≤0.05) in biochemical parameters such as total protein, globulin, albumin, blood urea nitrogen (BUN), bilirubin, glucose at different time intervals than control groups. A substantial decrease (p≤0.05) was noticed in T1 and T2 in the levels of triglycerides, HDLc, LDLc, total cholesterol, superoxide production, lipid peroxidation at different time intervals. An apparent surge (p≤0.05) was observed in the levels of HSP70, IL-4, IL-2, and lymphocyte proliferation in T1 and T2 compared to control groups. After histomorphological analysis, an increase(p≤0.05) in villi height (µm) and crypt depth (µm) in duodenum and jejunum of chicks were noticed in T1 and T2. In short, multi-strain probiotics supplementation showed its potential as an overall growth promoter in terms of improved growth performance, favorable physiological functions, enhanced immunomodulatory effects and better intestinal morphology in a widely reared backyard poultry breed of Andaman and Nicobar Islands, hence can be nominated as a potential alternative to commercial antibiotics at ground level.
Keywords: Andaman and Nicobar Islands, Multi-strain probiotics, Backyard poultry, Growth promoter, Immunomodulation, Serum biochemistry
Received: 08 May 2025; Accepted: 09 Jul 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Halder, JOARDAR, Sunder, De, Bhattacharya, Abd El Wahed, Kobialka, Madathiparambil and Mondal. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Rea Maja Kobialka, Institute of Animal Hygiene and Veterinary Public Health, Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.