Abstract
Zearalenone (ZEN), a mycotoxin produced by Fusarium species, is widely distributed and poses significant health risks to both animals and humans due to its toxic effects. In this study, a Priestia megaterium MF3, exhibiting high ZEN degradation capacity, was identified through comprehensive morphological, physicochemical, 16S rRNA gene sequencing, and whole-genome sequencing analyses. Strain MF3 reached its peak ZEN degradation rate in BHI medium (pH 7, 30°C), with > 90% efficiency maintained across 24–72 h, 1–5% inoculum, and 10–40 μg/mL ZEN. The ZEN-degrading activity of strain MF3 was attributed to both extracellular and intracellular components, with extracellular enzymes in the fermentation supernatant playing a predominant role. LC-MS analysis identified key ZEN degradation products, including 1-(3,5-dihydroxyphenyl)-6’-hydroxy-1’-undecen-10’-one, ZEN-P, and zearalanone. Whole-genome sequencing further revealed the presence of genes encoding α/β hydrolases and phosphotransferases, which are likely involved in the hydrolysis and phosphorylation of ZEN. Furthermore, strain MF3 demonstrated an impressive ability to remove 81.78% of ZEN from moldy corn within 12 h. This study not only identifies a highly efficient bacterial strain for ZEN biodegradation but also provides valuable insights into its degradation mechanism, offering potential applications for mycotoxin detoxification in the food and feed industries.
1 Introduction
Zearalenone (ZEN), a secondary metabolite with the chemical structure 6-(10-hydroxy-6-oxo-trans-1-undecenyl)-β-resorcylic acid lactone, is predominantly produced by Fusarium species (Altomare et al., 2021). It is commonly found in contaminated food and feed products, including corn, barley, wheat, and other grains, as well as their derivatives (; ). ZEN has been shown to exert hepatotoxic, immunotoxic, and genotoxic effects (; ). Additionally, it has been classified as a Group 3 carcinogen by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (). Regulatory authorities worldwide have implemented rigorous standards controlling ZEN concentrations, as defined by established maximum residue thresholds. EU legislation sets varying ZEN limits for different cereal products: 100 μg/kg for raw cereals (excluding maize), 75 μg/kg for cereals meant for direct human consumption, and 20 μg/kg for processed cereal foods, particularly emphasizing baby food products (). The Chinese National Food Safety Standard establishes a 60 μg/kg maximum residue limit for ZEN in cereals and their processed derivatives (). Consequently, the swift and efficient removal of ZEN residues has become a critical concern that demands immediate attention in the field of food and feed safety.
At present, physical, chemical, and biological methods are commonly utilized for the removal of ZEN (; ; ). Biological methods, including microbial adsorption, microbial degradation, and enzymatic degradation, have become the most efficient due to their high effectiveness, low cost, and environmentally friendliness (; ). To date, numerous microorganisms capable of efficiently eliminating ZEN have been successfully isolated (; ). Among the bacteria capable of eliminating ZEN, Priestia is a newly identified genus that was reclassified from Bacillus (). Similar to Bacillus, it is considered the most promising candidate due to its moderate nutritional needs, production of various bioactive compounds, and ability to sporulate, which allows it to survive under harsh environmental conditions, including extreme temperatures and pH levels (; ). For instance, Bacillus megaterium BM344-1 (now known as Priestia megaterium) was reported to degrade 25% of 1.5 μg/mL of ZEN in maize within 44 h (). Bacillus pumilus ANSB01G was found to degrade 88.65, 84.58, 83.04, and 66.34% of ZEN in liquid culture medium, natural moldy corn, pig feed, and distiller’s grains, respectively (). In a similar vein, B. amyloliquefaciens ZDS-1 demonstrated high efficiency in degrading ZEN at high concentrations (1 mg/L to 100 mg/L) (). Additionally, enzymatic activity is crucial in microbial detoxification, facilitating the transformation of mycotoxins into harmless or less harmful metabolites (; ). For example, the lactonohydrolase ZHD101 derived from Gliocladium roseum has been identified to convert ZEN into 1-(3,5-dihydroxyphenyl)-6’-hydroxy-1’-undecen-10’-one, a metabolite devoid of estrogenic activity (). An intracellular zearalenone phosphotransferase from B. subtilis Y816 was able to convert ZEN into ZEN-14-phosphate, which exhibited reduced estrogenic toxicity compared to ZEN (). Although microorganisms have demonstrated great potential in the ZEN degradation, their degradation efficiency is often limited by prolonged degradation period, underscoring the need to screen strains with high degradation capacity. Furthermore, the underlying mechanisms of degradation by numerous strains have not been fully elucidated, and the potential toxicity of their metabolic byproducts remains unassessed, which significantly restricts their practical applicability ().
Therefore, the aims of this study were to (1) isolate and characterize a strain Priestia megaterium MF3 with high ZEN degradation capacity; (2) optimize its ZEN degradation conditions, including culture medium, culture time, inoculation size, pH, temperature, and ZEN concentrations; (3) assess the effects of its active components on ZEN degradation; (4) analyze and identify the ZEN degradation products; (5) analyze its genome to identify potential genes involved in ZEN degradation; and (6) evaluate its ZEN degradation ability in moldy corn.
2 Materials and methods
2.1 Reagents and cultivation medium
Zearalenone (ZEN) was obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, Missouri, United States). Sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) and proteinase K were sourced from Sangon Biotech (Shanghai, China), while ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) was acquired from Macklin (Shanghai, China). Corn was purchased from a local farmers’ market in Shangqiu City. Other chemical reagents, unless otherwise stated, were all analytical grade.
Mineral salt medium (MSM) used for the enrichment culture of soil samples consisted of Na2HPO4 (6.8 g/L), KH2PO4 (3 g/L), NaCl (0.5 g/L), NH4Cl (1 g/L), MgSO4 (0.24 g/L), and CaCl2 (0.011 g/L). Luria-Bertani broth (LB), Nutrient broth (NB), Tryptic soy broth (TSB), and Brain heart infusion (BHI) broth were employed for strain culturing and their components are detailed in Supplementary Table S1.
2.2 Screening, isolation, and purification of zearalenone-degrading bacteria
Soil samples were collected from Dongzhaigang mangrove reserve (19°57′N, 110°34′E), Hainan, China. This region (3,337.3 hm2, including 1,576.24 hm2 of mangrove) has a typical tropical maritime climate, with annual precipitation ranging from 1,600 to 2,000 mm and a mean annual temperature of 23.8°C (; ). The area experiences irregular diurnal tides with an average tidal range of approximately 1 m (). As China’s most pristine and biodiverse mangrove wetland, it hosts 35 mangrove species, accounting for 95% of the country’s total. The predominant soil type is acid sulfate soil with deep nearshore soil layer and abundant organic matter (). For enrichment, the soil sample was introduced into MSM medium supplemented with 10 μg/mL ZEN at a 2% (w/v) ratio, followed by incubation at 37°C and 180 rpm for 24 h. The culture solutions were then sampled, serially diluted, and spread onto MSM solid agar (containing 10 μg/mL of ZEN), followed by another 24–h incubation at 37°C. Individual colonies were aseptically selected and further streaked onto LB agar plate until uniform single colonies were obtained. The preliminary isolates were then inoculated into LB medium containing 10 μg/mL ZEN and cultured at 37°C and 180 rpm for 24 h. LB medium with 10 μg/mL of ZEN, incubated under identical conditions, was used as the control.
ZEN quantification was performed using LC-MS/MS analysis (Qtrap™ 6500+, SCIEX, United States), where 5 μL aliquots were introduced into the system operating in negative ion electrospray ionization (ESI) mode. The LC-MS/MS conditions were set as follows: Kinetex® C18 column (2.1 × 150 mm, particle 1.7 μm, Phenomenex, United States); mobile phase A: water with 0.1% formic acid and 5% acetonitrile; mobile phase B: 95% acetonitrile with 0.1% formic acid; column temperature: 40°C; flow rate: 0.3 mL/min; gradient program: 0–5 min, 25–70% B; 5–6 min, 70% B; 6–6.1 min, 70–25%B; 6.1–8 min, 25%B. MS/MS parameters were as follows: ionization mode: negative ESI; ion spray voltage: −4500 V; source temperature: 350°C; nebulizer gas (GS1): 30 psi; drying gas (GS2): 6 L/min; curtain gas: 30 psi; MRM (Multiple Reaction Monitoring) mode was used to detect ZEN; parent ion (Q1): m/z 317.1 → product ion (Q3): m/z 175; declustering potential (DP): −60 V; collision energy: −24 eV; dwell time: 100 ms. ZEN concentration was quantified using the external standard method, based on a calibration curve constructed from serial dilutions of ZEN standards. The linearity of the calibration curve (R2 > 0.99) was used to calculate the sample concentration based on peak area. This approach has been previously applied and validated in ZEN detection by LC-MS/MS (). The ZEN degradation rate was calculated using the formula:
where A0 and A1 represented the peak area of ZEN in the control and experimental groups, respectively.
2.3 Identification of strain MF3
Strain MF3 was identified through morphological observation, Gram staining, physiological and biochemical assays (), and 16S rRNA sequence analysis. Physiological and biochemical characterization were conducted using HBI biochemical identification system (Hope Bio-Technology Co., Ltd., Qingdao, China), assessing citrate utilization, propionate metabolism, D-xylose and D-arabinose assimilation, D-Mannitol fermentation, Voges-Proskauer (V-P) reaction, gelatin liquefaction, tolerance to 7% NaCl and pH 5.7, nitrate reduction, and starch hydrolysis. The genomic DNA of MF3 strain was extracted following the MiniBEST Bacteria Genomic DNA Extraction Kit (TaKaRa, DaLian, China). The 16S rRNA gene fragment was amplified using the universal primers 27F (5′-AGAGTTTGATCCTGGCTCAG-3′) and 1492R (5′-GGTTACCTTGTTACGACTT-3′) (; ), and the resulting PCR product was subsequently sequenced by Tsingke Biotech (Beijing, China). Sequence alignment was performed using the NCBI Blast Tool for homology analysis (). A phylogenetic tree of strain MF3 was generated using the Neighbor-Joining method in MEGA 11 software ().
2.4 The growth and ZEN degradation of strain MF3 in different culture media
Strain MF3 was incubated at 37°C and 180 rpm for 12 h. The overnight culture solution of strain MF3 was then centrifuged at 8,000 × g and 37°C for 5 min. The harvested cells were resuspended in the sterile saline to an optical density equivalent to 0.5 McFarland standard. Cell suspensions were inoculated (1% of inoculation, v/v) into different media (LB, NB, TSB, and BHI medium) containing ZEN at a final concentration of 10 μg/mL. Control groups either contained the same concentration of ZEN but were not inoculated with bacterial cells or were inoculated with bacterial cells but without the addition of ZEN. The media were then incubated at 37°C and 180 rpm. For ZEN degradation analysis, samples were collected after 24 h of fermentation. Samples were taken at 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, and 40 h to analyze the growth strain MF3 in different media containing 10 μg/mL of ZEN.
2.5 Effect of culture conditions on ZEN degradation by strain MF3
0.5 McFarland standard of cell suspension was obtained as described in section 2.4 and used for subsequent determination the effect of culture conditions (culture time, inoculum size, initial pH, temperature, and ZEN concentration) on ZEN degradation by strain MF3.
For the culture duration experiment, a 1% (v/v) inoculum of cell suspension was introduced into BHI medium supplemented with ZEN (final concentration of 10 μg/mL and incubated) and then cultured at the condition of 37°C and 180 rpm. Samples were collected at designated time points (6, 12, 24, 48, and 72 h) for further analysis.
For the inoculum size test, cell suspension was inoculated into BHI medium (containing 10 μg/mL of ZEN) with different inoculum size (1, 2, 3, 4, and 5%; v/v) and cultured at 37°C, 180 rpm for 24 h.
For the initial pH test, cell suspension was inoculated (5% of inoculation, v/v) into BHI medium (containing 10 μg/mL of ZEN) with pH values of 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9. The mixture was incubated at 37°C and 180 rpm for 24 h.
In the temperature experiment, a 5% (v/v) cell suspension was added to BHI medium containing 10 μg/mL of ZEN, and the mixture was incubated at different temperatures (20°, 25°, 30°, 37°, and 42°C) with agitation at 180 rpm for 24 h.
For the ZEN concentration assay, a 5% (v/v) inoculum was introduced into BHI medium supplemented with different initial ZEN concentrations (1.25, 2.5, 5, 10, 15, 20, and 40 μg/mL) and cultured at 30°C with shaking at 180 rpm for 24 h.
Control groups contained the same concentration of ZEN but without bacteria inoculation, were subjected to identical incubation conditions as the experimental groups. The cell density of strain MF3 was assessed by measuring absorbance at 600 nm.
2.6 ZEN degradation by different components of strain MF3 culture broth
A cell suspension with a turbidity of 0.5 McFarland standard was inoculated into BHI medium containing 10 μg/mL ZEN at a 5% (v/v) ratio and cultured at 30°C with shaking at 180 rpm for 12 h. Cells and fermentation supernatants were separated by centrifugation (8,000 × g, 4°C, 15 min). The collected cells were washed three times with an equal volume of phosphate-buffered saline (PBS, pH 7.2, 20 mM) and resuspended in an equivalent volume of PBS. The resuspended cells were disrupted via ultrasonication (600 W, 15 min) in an ice bath using intermittent pulses (5 s on 5 s off) to prevent overheating. The resulting mixture was then centrifuged at 10,000 × g and 4°C for 15 min to collect the cell disruption supernatant. Heat inactivated cells were prepared by heating resuspended cells at 100°C for 15 min. Each component (bacterial solution, viable cells, heat inactivated cells, cell disruption supernatants, and fermentation supernatants, respectively) was supplemented with ZEN to a final concentration of 10 μg/mL and incubated at 30°C with shaking at 180 rpm for 12 h. For the bacterial solution and fermentation supernatant tests, BHI medium containing with 10 μg/mL of ZEN served as the control. PBS (pH 7.2, 20 mM) containing 10 μg/mL of ZEN was used as the control for the viable cells, cell disruption supernatant, and heat inactivated cell groups.
2.7 ZEN degradation by strain MF3 fermentation supernatant with different treatment
The fermentation supernatant of strain MF3 was prepared as described in section 2.6. The fermentation supernatant was subjected to various treatments, including incubation with protease K (200 μg/mL) at 37°C for 1 h, heating at 100°C for 15 min, and treatment with SDS (10%, w/v) or EDTA (5 mM) at 37°C for 30 min, respectively. The fermentation supernatant without protease K, heating, SDS, or EDTA served as the control. All samples were supplemented with ZEN to a final concentration of 10 μg/mL and incubated at 30°C with shaking at 180 rpm for 12 h.
2.8 Analysis of degradation products of ZEN by strain MF3
Strain MF3 was cultured in BHI medium under the optimal conditions described above. Samples were prepared according to and analyzed by LCMS-IT-TOF (Shimadzu, Tokyo, Japan) using the method of . The mobile phase A and B were the same as these mentioned in section 2.2. The gradient program was set as follows: 0–1 min, 10% B; 1–7 min, 10–100% B; 7–9 min, 100%B; 9–9.01 min, 100–10%B; 9.01–10 min, 10%B. The injection volume was 3 μL. The flow rate was 0.3 mL/min. The electrospray ion source operated in positive ion mode, with a scan range of 100−500 m/z. The interface voltage was set to 3.5 kV. Nitrogen was used as the nebulizing gas at a flow rate of 1.5 L/min and a pressure of 200 kPa. The curved desolvation line (CDL) and the heat block were both maintained at 200°C. The ion accumulation time was 30 ms, and the precursor ion selection width was set to 3.0 amu. Argon served as both the cooling and collision gas, with the collision-induced dissociation (CID) energy set at 50%. The pressure in the time-of-flight (TOF) region was maintained at 1.5 × 10–4 Pa, while that in the ion trap was 1.7 × 10–2 Pa. The detector voltage was set to 1.64 kV.
2.9 ZEN degradation in moldy corn by strain MF3
The ZEN degradation test for moldy corn was performed using the method described by , with minor modifications. Specifically, the reaction mixture consisted of 1 g of moldy corn flour, 3.5 mL of PBS (pH 7.2, 20 mM), and 0.5 mL of strain MF3 bacterial solution. The reaction mixture was incubated at 37°C with shaking at 180 rpm for 12 h. Following incubation, samples were collected by centrifugation (10,000 × g, 4°C, 15 min). The control group involved using a heat-inactivated MF3 bacterial solution. All the samples were subsequently analyzed using LCMS-IT-TOF (Shimadzu, Tokyo, Japan), as described in section 2.8.
2.10 Genome sequencing and bioinformatics analysis
Genomic analysis of strain MF3 was performed by Majorbio (Shanghai, China). Sequencing was performed using a combination of PacBio Sequel II and Illumina platforms. The raw Illumina sequencing reads were screened using Fastp (v0.20.0) to obtain clean short reads. The HiFi reads were generated from the PacBio platform. The obtained clean short reads and HiFi reads were assembled to construct complete genomes using Flye (v2.9.2) (). To reduce the rate of small errors, Pilon (v1.22) was used to polish the assembly using short-read alignments (). Finally, a gap-free circular genome was constructed successfully. The genome annotation was carried out using the NCBI Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline. The 16S rRNA sequence (accession number: PV262373) and the whole genome sequence data (accession number: chromosome, CP185256; plasmid A, CP185257; plasmid B, CP185258; and plasmid C, CP185259) have been archived in the NCBI database.
2.11 Statistical analysis
Each experiment was repeated three times. Statistical analysis was performed using one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post-hoc test for multiple group comparisons. For pairwise comparisons between related samples, a two-tailed paired t-test was applied.
3 Results and discussion
3.1 Isolation and identification of ZEN-degrading strain MF3
Following the initial plate screening and subsequent flask screening, the exceptional ZEN-degrading ability of strain MF3 was demonstrated following 24 h of incubation in LB medium with 10 μg/mL of ZEN. During this incubation, new metabolic compounds were identified (Supplementary Figure S1).
To identify strain MF3, its morphological, physic-biochemical, and molecular characteristics were analyzed. As shown in Figure 1, strain MF3 was identified as a rod-shaped, Gram-positive bacterium, and its colonies are flat, round or oval, opaque, and white, transitioning to light yellow upon growth. Similar to most Bacillus Spp., strain MF3 exhibited the ability to hydrolyze gelatin and starch (). In the HBI biochemical identification system test, strain MF3 tested positive for the V-P test and the utilization of L-arabinose and D-mannitol but tested negative for citrate, propionate, and D-xylose. In addition, strain MF3, which lacked nitrate reduction capability, could thrive under pH 5.7 conditions and tolerate up to 7% NaCl (Table 1). Phylogenetic analysis based on the 16S rRNA gene and housekeeping genes, along with subsequent whole-genome comparisons (Supplementary Figure S2), strain MF3 was found to be closely related to Priestia megaterium, a species previously classified under the genus Bacillus (). Moreover, the average nucleotide identity (ANI) value of MF3 and Priestia megaterium (GCF 009497655.1) was 99.42% (Supplementary Figure S2d), indicating that strain MF3 may belong to the same species as Priestia megaterium (GCF 009497655.1) (). Nevertheless, significant differences were observed in the physiological and biochemical characteristics (Table 1), particularly in the V-P tests, where strain MF3 tested positive while P. megaterium yielded negative results (; ; ; ; ).
FIGURE 1
TABLE 1
| Characteristics | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 |
| V-P test | + | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
| Citrate | − | ND | ND | ND | ND | + | + | − |
| Propionate | − | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | − | ND |
| D-xylose | − | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | − |
| L-arabinose | + | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | − |
| D-mannitol | + | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND |
| Gelatin liquefaction | + | + | + | + | + | ND | ND | ND |
| 7% NaCl | + | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | + | − |
| pH 5.7 growth | + | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | + | ND |
| Nitrate reduction | − | ND | ND | ND | ND | + | + | − |
| Starch hydrolysis | + | + | + | + | + | ND | + | ND |
Physiological and biochemical characteristics of strain MF3 and other Priestia megaterium species.
Strain: 1, MF3 (this study); 2, Priestia megaterium TGB1 (), 3, 4, and 5, Priestia megaterium KD5, Priestia megaterium KD7, and Priestia megaterium KD8 (); 6, Priestia megaterium E7 (), 7, Priestia megaterium (); 8, Priestia megaterium IAM 13418T ().+, positive, −, negative; ND, not determined.
3.2 The growth and ZEN degradation of strain MF3 in different culture media
The composition of the culture medium is crucial for microbial growth and the bio-decomposition of pollutants (; ). To evaluate the growth and ZEN degradation of strain MF3, four common media (LB, NB, TSB, and BHI) were tested. The growth curves of strain MF3 in these media showed similar trends, both with and without ZEN supplementation. Although the presence of ZEN slightly reduced biomass production, it had minimal impact on the growth of strain MF3 (Figure 2). The findings align with those of , who reported that ZEN exhibited minimal effects on the growth of B. natto. When comparing the growth and ZEN degradation of strain MF3 across different culture media, strain MF3 exhibited better growth and the highest ZEN degradation in BHI medium, followed by TSB medium, where it also showed robust growth and significant ZEN degradation. In contrast, strain MF3 grew the slowest and degraded the least ZEN in NB medium (Figures 2b, 3a).
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 3
3.3 Effect of culture conditions on ZEN degradation by strain MF3
Microbial growth and pollutant degradation are influenced by various factors, including culture time, inoculation volume, temperature, pH, and ZEN concentration (; ). To evaluate their impact on ZEN degradation by strain MF3, these factors were systematically tested. As shown in Figure 3b, strain MF3 successfully degraded ZEN at all tested incubation times. The ZEN degradation rate by strain MF3 increased from 0 to 24 h and then stabilized from 24 to 72 h. In accordance with our findings, stated that the ZEN degradation rates of Proteus mirabilis SY-3, B. subtilis SY-14, and B. subtilis SY-20 all stabilized after a certain period. However, strain MF3 exhibited rapid growth during the initial 48 h, followed by a stable phase. Interestingly, the peak degradation rate occurred before MF3 reached its growth stable phase. This suggested that the number of cells and the quantity of secreted substances were sufficient for ZEN degradation during the exponential phase.
Inoculation size also influenced ZEN degradation. A previous study by reported no significant difference in ZEN degradation by B. subtilis SY-14 when the inoculum size ranged from 1 to 9%, although the 1% inoculum size resulted in a higher degradation rate. Similarly, for strain MF3, no significant differences in ZEN degradation or growth were observed across various inoculum sizes. However, a 5% inoculum size yielded the highest growth and ZEN degradation rate (Figure 3c).
The pH of the culture medium is one of the most critical factors influencing microbial growth and enzymatic reactions (; ; ). Here, an experiment was conducted to evaluate the effects of different initial pH values on the growth and ZEN degradation of strain MF3. As shown in Figure 3d, strain MF3 was capable of growth and efficient ZEN degradation within a pH range of 5.0–8.0, with the optimal growth and ZEN degradation observed at pH 7.0. Extreme pH values (e.g., 3, 4, and 9) inhibited both growth and ZEN degradation. Similar studies have also reported that B. spizizenii B73, another ZEN-degrading strain, exhibited optimal growth and degradation activity at pH 7.0 ().
Temperature is a critical factor influencing microbial growth and metabolic activity (; ). Strain MF3 demonstrated efficient ZEN degradation across all tested temperatures ranges (Figure 3e). The degradation rate of ZEN increased with temperature up to 30°C, after which it gradually decreased, reaching 60.57% at 42°C. Thus, strain MF3 exhibited optimal ZEN degradation at 30°C. This finding is consistent with , who reported that the optimal temperature for ZEN degradation by B. amyloliquefaciens ZDS-1 was 30°C, but its ZEN degradation rate decreased rapidly to less than 10% at 40°C. Additionally, strain MF3 was able to grow within a temperature range of 20–42°C, with optimal growth occurring at 37°C. Interestingly, while growth activity decreased at 42°C, strain MF3 still maintained a higher ZEN degradation rate, suggesting that the enzymes involved in ZEN degradation have a broad temperature tolerance.
ZEN is recognized for its capacity to disrupt both DNA replication and protein biosynthesis, which may consequently affect microbial proliferation and cellular integrity (; ). Therefore, this study investigated the effects of ZEN concentration on the growth and degradation capabilities of strain MF3. As shown in Figure 3f, ZEN degradation was positively correlated with ZEN concentration in the range of 1.25–10 μg/mL. ZEN degradation rates exhibited no significant difference within the range of 10–40 μg/mL, with all rates exceeding 95%. Strain MF3 exhibited robust growth across ZEN concentration of 1.25–40 μg/mL, although growth gradually declined at concentrations above 10 μg/mL. This is likely due to the toxicity of higher ZEN concentrations, which may impair cell function and inhibit strain growth ().
3.4 ZEN degradation by different components of strain MF3 culture broth
Absorption and degradation are the primary mechanisms for microbial removal of ZEN (; ; ). To investigate the mechanism of ZEN removal by strain MF3, the ZEN degradation capabilities of different components were assessed, including bacterial solution, viable cells, heat inactivated cells, cell disruption supernatants, and fermentation supernatants. As shown in Figure 4a, fermentation supernatants and viable cells exhibited higher ZEN degradation rates of 62.36 and 60.07%, respectively. Cell disruption supernatants demonstrated a moderate ZEN degradation rate of 33.44%. In addition, heat inactivated cells still showed 26.48% of ZEN degradation rate. It can be concluded that both cell adsorption and degradation contribute to ZEN removal, with the ZEN degradation by strain MF3 primarily originating from extracellular supernatant and intracellular substances ().
FIGURE 4
3.5 ZEN degradation by strain MF3 fermentation supernatant with different treatment
To determine whether ZEN degradation was enzymatic, the fermentation supernatants were treated with protease K, heat, adding SDS or EDTA prior to exposure to ZEN. As shown in Figure 4b, the ZEN degradation ability of the fermentation supernatants significantly decreased after all treatments compared to the untreated control. SDS treatment resulted in the lowest ZEN degradation rate (18.58%) in the fermentation supernatants. ZEN degradation rates of the fermentation supernatants treated with protease K or heat were 26.19 and 27.77%, respectively. Furthermore, the ZEN degradation rate of the fermentation supernatants decreased to 52.96% after treatment with EDTA. Protein activity is significantly compromised through multiple mechanisms: SDS-induced structural denaturation, enzymatic degradation by protease K, thermal destabilization, and EDTA’s metal ion sequestration, all of which ultimately impair ZEN degradation capacity (; ; ). Based on our results, enzymes in the fermentation supernatants of strain MF3 likely contribute to ZEN degradation, and the activity of some enzymes involved in the ZEN degradation process may depend on the presence of metal ions.
3.6 Characterization of ZEN degradation products by strain MF3
To investigate the mechanism underlying ZEN degradation by strain MF3, degradation intermediates were analyzed using an LCMS-IT-TOF system. ZEN exhibited a retention time (RT) of 6.96 min, with its mass spectrum showing a molecular ion at m/z 319 [M+H]+ (Supplementary Figure S3). The RTs of three new products, identified as P1, P2, and P3, were 0.84 min, 4.52 min, and 5.18 min, respectively (Supplementary Figures S4–S6).
According to the mass spectrum characteristics of P1 (Supplementary Figure S4), the molecular ion peak at m/z 321 [M+H]+ (2 Da higher than that of ZEN) suggests that P1 is likely zearalanone, produced by the reduction of C1’ = C2’double bond in ZEN, as previously reported by . The protonated ion of P2 was detected at m/z 293, corresponding to a molecular weight of 292, with its mass spectrum matching the molecular formula C17H24O4 (Supplementary Figure S5). 1-(3,5-dihydroxyphenyl)-6’-hydroxy-1’-undecen-10’-one, with the chemical formula C17H24O4, is a known intermediate of ZEN hydrolysis, as reported by and . Furthermore, ZEN exhibits a typical macrolide structure, and the hydrolysis of its lactone ring is a well-established degradation pathway (). Therefore, P2 was identified as 1-(3,5-dihydroxyphenyl)-6’-hydroxy-1’-undecen-10’-one. For P3, the protonated ion at m/z 399 and its MS spectrum was consistent with ZEN-P (Supplementary Figure S6; ). Additionally, B. subtilis Y816, which belongs to the same family as strain MF3, has been reported to transform ZEN into its phosphorylated conjugate, ZEN-P (). Therefore, P3 was inferred as ZEN-P. The structures of ZEN degradation products are summarized in Table 2. Based on the identified metabolites, the ZEN degradation by strain MF3 possibly involved three metabolic pathways: reduction of the carbon-carbon double bond, hydrolysis, and phosphorylation (Figure 5). In addition to elucidating the metabolic pathways of ZEN degradation, future research should also focus on the toxicological assessment of the resulting metabolites. In particular, the estrogenic activities of zearalanone (P1), ZEN-P (P3), and other transformation products warrant further investigation, for instance, using in vitro assays such as the MCF-7 cell proliferation model. Such evaluations are essential to ensure the biosafety and practical applicability of strain MF3 in food and feed detoxification.
TABLE 2
| Products | RT (min) | Measured mass [M + H]+ (m/z) | Common name | Proposed structure | References |
| P1 | 0.84 | 321 | Zearalanone |  | () |
| P2 | 4.52 | 293 | 1-(3, 5-dihydroxyphenyl)-6’-hydroxy-1’-undecen-10’-one |  | (; ) |
| P3 | 5.18 | 399 | ZEN-P |  | () |
Identification of the ZEN degradation products by strain MF3.
FIGURE 5
3.7 ZEN degradation in moldy corn by strain MF3
Corn, one of the most common foods susceptible to ZEN contaminations, was selected to evaluate the ZEN degradation efficiency of strain MF3. As shown in Figure 6, the ZEN concentration in moldy corn was significantly reduced from 1.51 to 0.27 μg/g after 12 h of treatment with strain MF3, falling below the regulatory threshold of 0.5 μg/g for corn in feed (; ). In comparison, reported B. subtilis achieved 75% ZEN degradation in corn flour after 48 h. demonstrated that B. velezensis ANSB01E removed 75.36% of ZEN from moldy corn meal after 48 h, while B. spizizenii B73 reduced ZEN concentration in corn meal by 80.31% after 36 h (). Notably, in the present study, strain MF3 achieved a significant ZEN reduction of 81.78% for moldy corn after 12 h, highlighting its potential as a feed additive for mitigating ZEN contamination in feed.
FIGURE 6
3.8 Genome sequencing and bioinformatics analysis
To investigate the genomic characteristics, identify ZEN degradation-related genes, and explore the degradation mechanism of strain MF3, its entire genome was sequenced. The genome of strain MF3 consists of 1 chromosome and 3 plasmid (Figure 7). The total genome size of strain MF3 is 5,328,574 bp, with an average GC content of 38.06%. The genome of strain MF3 contains 5,382 coding sequences (CDS), 125 tRNA genes, and 42 rRNA genes. These genomic features are similar to those of other complete Priestia genus genomes deposited in the NCBI database, with genome sizes ranging from 3.817 to 6.873 Mb, GC contents from 36.5 to 61.5%, and CDS numbers from 3,740 to 6,963 (Supplementary Table S2). The 5,382 CDS were annotated using several databases, including NR, Swiss-Prot, Pfam, COG, GO, and KEGG. The number of genes assigned to each database were 5,374, 4,095, 4,421, 4,051, 2,940, and 3,679, respectively.
FIGURE 7
In the present study, hydrolysis, phosphorylation, and reduction of the carbon-carbon double bond occurred during the ZEN degradation process by strain MF3, yielding 1-(3,5-dihydroxyphenyl)-6’-hydroxy-1’-undecen-10’-one, ZEN-P, and zearalanone. Therefore, A BLAST comparison of known ZEN-degrading enzymes was performed with the genome of strain MF3. Seven genes (gene1670, gene1672, gene2399, gene3401, gene3653, gene4846, and gene4906) were annotated as encoding α/β hydrolase and exhibited 24.4, 30.5, 21.4, 22.1, 30.9, 20.7, and 26.9% amino acid identity, respectively, with the well-known ZEN hydrolase ZHD101, which hydrolyzes ZEN into 1-(3,5-dihydroxyphenyl)-10’-hydroxy-1’-undecen-6’-one (; ). Compared to ZHD101, these seven genes all belonged to the α/β hydrolase family and contained the characteristic α/β hydrolase domain, as further confirmed by phylogenetic analysis (Supplementary Table S3; Supplementary Figure S7a).
BLAST analysis further revealed that gene1321, gene1641, gene1828, and gene4732, functionally annotated as phosphoenolpyruvate-protein phosphotransferase, PEP/pyruvate-binding domain-containing protein, phosphoenolpyruvate synthase, and pyruvate kinase, respectively, exhibited 34.1, 49.4, 27.8, and 31.5% amino acid identity with ZEN phosphotransferase (MZ170042.1), which has been reported to convert ZEN into ZEN-14-phosphate (). Notably, gene1641 not only clustered in the same phylogenetic branch as ZEN phosphotransferase (MZ170042.1), but also shared the most conserved domain with it (Supplementary Figures S7b, S8).
investigated the in vitro transformation of α/β-ZAL and zearalanone (ZAN) by oxo-reductases in microsomal and cytosolic fractions obtained from lamb livers, demonstrating that ZAN production depended on the presence of NAD/NADH as a co-factor. Numerous genes in the strain MF3 have been annotated as NAD(P) or NAD(P)H-dependent oxidoreductase (data not shown). Notably, only one gene, gene3254, encoding a bifunctional cytochrome P450/NADPH-P450 reductase, was identified in the strain MF3 genome (Supplementary Table S3). However, to the best of our knowledge, the specific enzyme responsible for converting ZEN to zearalanone has not been reported, necessitating further research to identify enzymes involved in this metabolic process.
4 Conclusion
In this study, a Priestia megaterium MF3, exhibiting high ZEN degradation capacity, was identified through comprehensive morphological, physicochemical, 16S rRNA gene sequencing, and whole-genome sequencing analyses. ZEN degradation capacity of strain MF3 was enhanced by optimizing culture conditions, including culture composition, culture time, inoculation size, pH, temperature, and ZEN concentration. The active components responsible for ZEN degradation were found both extracellularly and intracellularly, with enzymatic activity in the extracellular fermentation supernatant playing a key role in ZEN degradation. LC-MS analysis identified the key ZEN degradation products as 1-(3,5-dihydroxyphenyl)-6’-hydroxy-1’-undecen-10’-one, ZEN-P, and zearalanone. Strain MF3 significantly reduced the ZEN concentration in moldy corn. Additionally, certain genes in the MF3 genome were annotated to encode α/β hydrolase and phosphotransferase, which may contribute to the hydrolysis and phosphorylation of ZEN. Further studies are needed to identify the specific enzymes involved in the conversion of ZEN to zearalanone.
Statements
Data availability statement
The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. The names of the repository/repositories and accession number(s) can be found in Supplementary material.
Author contributions
DM: Validation, Writing – original draft, Investigation, Funding acquisition. K-ZX: Writing – review & editing, Methodology. H-JH: Writing – review & editing, Funding acquisition. J-BL: Investigation, Writing – review & editing, Software. D-DD: Writing – review & editing, Funding acquisition. J-ML: Writing – review & editing, Funding acquisition. Y-KF: Validation, Writing – original draft. X-QZ: Conceptualization, Writing – review & editing. D-LP: Conceptualization, Writing – review & editing.
Funding
The author(s) declare that financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article. This work was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Henan (Nos. 242300420355 and 242300421532), Scientific and Technological Research Projects in Henan Province (No. 242102320358), 2025 Henan Province Graduate Education Reform and Quality Improvement Project (YJS2025GZZ41), and the Key Scientific Research Project in Universities of Henan Province (No. 24A310009).
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Generative AI statement
The authors declare that no Generative AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Supplementary material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2025.1630165/full#supplementary-material
References
1
AltomareC.LogriecoA. F.GalloA. (2021). “Mycotoxins and mycotoxigenic fungi: Risk and management. A challenge for future global food safety and security,” in Encyclopedia of mycology, edsZaragozaÓCasadevallA. (Oxford: Elsevier), 64–93. 10.3390/foods13223582
2
AltschulS. F.GishW.MillerW.MyersE. W.LipmanD. J. (1990). Basic local alignment search tool.J. Mol. Biol.215403–410. 10.1016/s0022-2836(05)80360-2
3
AndréA.HechtK.MischlerS.StäheliL.KerhanajF.BullerR.et al (2024). A new physical and biological strategy to reduce the content of Zearalenone in infected wheat kernels: The effect of cold needle perforation, microorganisms, and purified enzyme.Food Res. Int.186:114364. 10.1016/j.foodres.2024.114364
4
BhattacharyyaD. K.AdakS.BandyopadhyayU.BanerjeeR. K. (1994). Mechanism of inhibition of horseradish peroxidase-catalysed iodide oxidation by edta.Biochem. J.298281–288. 10.1042/bj2980281
5
BurakD.BuketE. D. (2023). Analysis of multi-Mycotoxins in commonly consumed spices using the LC-MS/MS method for assessing food safety risks.Microorganisms11:1786. 10.3390/microorganisms11071786
6
CaiP. R.LiuS. Q.TuY.ShanT. Z. (2024). Toxicity, biodegradation, and nutritional intervention mechanism of zearalenone.Sci. Total Environ.911:168648. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.168648
7
CuiZ. L.HuL. N.ZengL. L.MengW. Q.GuoD.SunL. (2023). Isolation and characterization of Priestia megaterium KD7 for the biological control of pear fire blight.Front. Microbiol.14:1099664. 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1099664
8
FadiaB. T.BochraK.Yasir MohammedA.JalilaB. S. A.KamelC. (2019). Review: Biotechnology of mycotoxins detoxification using microorganisms and enzymes.Toxicon16012–22. 10.1016/j.toxicon.2019.02.001
9
FangY. Y.ZhangZ. X.XuW.ZhangW. L.GuangC.MuW. M. (2022). Zearalenone lactonase: Characteristics, modification, and application.Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol.1066877–6886. 10.1007/s00253-022-12205-5
10
GariJ. (2024). Current review of biodegradation and detoxification strategies for zearalenone contaminated food and feed.Int. J. Second. Metab.11157–168. 10.21448/ijsm.1271127
11
GuerreroR. (2001). Bergey’s manuals and the classification of prokaryotes.Int. Microbiol.4103–109. 10.1007/s101230100021
12
GuoY. P.ZhouJ. C.TangY.MaQ. G.ZhangJ. Y.JiC.et al (2020). Characterization and genome analysis of a zearalenone-degrading Bacillus velezensis strain ANSB01E.Curr. Microbiol.77273–278. 10.1007/s00284-019-01811-8
13
GuptaR. S.PatelS.SainiN.ChenS. (2020). Robust demarcation of 17 distinct Bacillus species clades, proposed as novel Bacillaceae genera, by phylogenomics and comparative genomic analyses: Description of Robertmurraya kyonggiensis sp. nov. and proposal for an emended genus Bacillus limiting it only to the members of the subtilis and cereus clades of species.Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol.705753–5798. 10.1099/ijsem.0.004475
14
HassanZ. U.Al ThaniR.AlsafranM.MigheliQ.JaouaS. (2021). Selection of Bacillus spp. with decontamination potential on multiple Fusarium mycotoxins.Food Control127:108119. 10.1016/j.foodcont.2021.108119
15
HornbaekT.JakobsenM.DynesenJ.NielsenA. K. (2004). Global transcription profiles and intracellular pH regulation measured in Bacillus licheniformis upon external pH upshifts.Arch. Microbiol.182467–474. 10.1007/s00203-004-0729-6
16
HossainT. J.DasM.AliF.ChowdhuryS. I.ZednyS. A. (2021). Substrate preferences, phylogenetic and biochemical properties of proteolytic bacteria present in the digestive tract of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus).AIMS Microbiol.7528–545. 10.3934/microbiol.2021032
17
HuJ. L.XinK.LiZ.GaoC.YanK. (2015). Carbon storage and sequestration function evaluation in Dongzhaigang mangrove reserve of Hainan.Wetland Sci.13338–343. 10.13248/j.cnki.wetlandsci.2015.03.011
18
HuJ.WangG.HouM.DuS.HanJ.YuY.et al (2023). New hydrolase from Aeromicrobium sp. HA for the biodegradation of zearalenone: Identification, mechanism, and application.J. Agric. Food Chem.712411–2420. 10.1021/acs.jafc.2c06410
19
JiJ.YuJ.YeY.ShengL.FangJ.YangY.et al (2023). Biodegradation methods and product analysis of zearalenone and its future development trend: A review.Food Control145:109469. 10.1016/j.foodcont.2022.109469
20
JuJ.TinyiroS. E.YaoW.YuH.GuoY.QianH.et al (2019). The ability of Bacillus subtilis and Bacillus natto to degrade zearalenone and its application in food.J. Food Process. Pres.43:e14122. 10.1111/jfpp.14122
21
KolmogorovM.YuanJ.LinY.PevznerP. A. (2019). Assembly of long, error-prone reads using repeat graphs.Nat. Biotechnol.37540–546. 10.1038/s41587-019-0072-8
22
KrólA.PomastowskiP.RafińskaK.Railean-PlugaruV.WalczakJ.BuszewskiB. (2018). Microbiology neutralization of zearalenone using Lactococcus lactis and Bifidobacterium sp.Anal. Bioanal. Chem.410943–952. 10.1007/s00216-017-0555-8
23
LeiY. P.ZhaoL.MaQ.ZhangJ. Y.ZhouT.GaoC.et al (2014). Degradation of zearalenone in swine feed and feed ingredients by Bacillus subtilis ANSB01G.World Mycotoxin J.7143–151. 10.3920/WMJ2013.1623
24
LiY.ChenS.YuZ.YaoJ.JiaY.LiaoC.et al (2024). A novel Bacillus velezensis for efficient degradation of zearalenone.Foods13:530. 10.3390/foods13040530
25
LiuF.XueP. Q.QiaoJ. Q.WuH. J.SunJ.GaoX. W. (2010). Isolation and identification of a low-temperature-adapted Bacillus in Tibet and its antagonistic and growth-promoting effect.Chin. J. Biol. Control4453–460. 10.16409/j.cnki.2095-039x.2010.04.013
26
LiuX.WuN.ZhangM.XueF.XuQ. (2023). Isolation and characterization of the zearalenone-degrading strain, Bacillus spizizenii B73, inspired by esterase activity.Toxins15:488. 10.3390/toxins15080488
27
MurtazaB.WangL.LiX.AliA.HaqS. U.Ji-binL.et al (2024). Novel Lactobacillus consortium for effective zearalenone adsorption and biodegradation.Int. Biodeter. Biodegr.194:105889. 10.1016/j.ibiod.2024.105889
28
PinkiS. A.Reazul KarimM.DewanjeeD.BhuiyanH. R.Abdullah, Al MasudH. M.et al (2021). Microbial reduction and detoxification of chromium from tannery effluent by natural inhabitants.Nat. Environ. Pollut. Technol.201369–1380. 10.46488/NEPT.2021.V20I03.051
29
PompaG.MontesissaC.Di LauroF. M.FadiniL.CapuaC. (1988). Zearanol metabolism by subcellular fractions from lamb liver.J. Vet. Pharmacol. Ther.11197–203. 10.1111/j.1365-2885.1988.tb00141.x
30
RopejkoK.TwarużekM. (2021). Zearalenone and its metabolites-general overview, occurrence, and toxicity.Toxins (Basel)13:35. 10.3390/toxins13010035
31
SteinT. (2005). Bacillus subtilis antibiotics: Structures, syntheses and specific functions.Mol. Microbiol.56845–857. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2005.04587.x
32
SunJ.XiaY.MingD. (2020). Whole-genome sequencing and bioinformatics analysis of apiotrichum mycotoxinivorans: Predicting putative zearalenone-degradation enzymes.Front. Microbiol.11:1866. 10.3389/fmicb.2020.01866
33
Takahashi-AndoN.KimuraM.KakeyaH.OsadaH.YamaguchiI. (2002). A novel lactonohydrolase responsible for the detoxification of zearalenone: Enzyme purification and gene cloning.Biochem. J.3651–6. 10.1042/bj20020450
34
TamuraK.StecherG.KumarS. (2021). Mega11: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 11.Mol. Biol. Evol.383022–3027. 10.1093/molbev/msab120
35
WaghV. S.RamH.DastagerS. G. (2021). Priestia veravalensis sp. nov., isolated from coastal sample.Arch. Microbiol.2034839–4845. 10.1007/s00203-021-02418-z
36
WalkerB. J.AbeelT.SheaT. (2014). Pilon: An integrated tool for comprehensive microbial variant detection and genome assembly improvement.PLoS One9:e112963. 10.1371/journal.pone.0112963
37
WangG.YuM.DongF.ShiJ.XuJ. (2017). Esterase activity inspired selection and characterization of zearalenone degrading bacteria Bacillus pumilus ES-21.Food Control7757–64. 10.1016/j.foodcont.2017.01.021
38
WangS.WangJ.TianY.WangJ. (2024). Uranium removal in groundwater by Priestia sp. isolated from uranium-contaminated mining soil.Chemosphere351:141204. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2024.141204
39
WangY.ZhangJ.WangY.WangK.WeiH.ShenL. (2018). Isolation and characterization of the Bacillus cereus BC7 strain, which is capable of zearalenone removal and intestinal flora modulation in mice.Toxicon1559–20. 10.1016/j.toxicon.2018.09.005
40
WangY.ZhaoC.ZhangD.ZhaoM.PengM.GuoP.et al (2020). Microbial degradation of zearalenone by a novel microbial consortium, NZDC-6, and its application on contaminated corncob by semisolid fermentation.J. Agric. Food Chem.681634–1644. 10.1021/acs.jafc.9b05343
41
XiangL.WangQ.ZhouY.YinL.ZhangG.MaY. (2016). High-level expression of a zen-detoxifying gene by codon optimization and biobrick in Pichia pastoris.Microbiol. Res.19348–56. 10.1016/j.micres.2016.09.004
42
XuH.WangL.SunJ.WangL.GuoH.YeY.et al (2022). Microbial detoxification of mycotoxins in food and feed.Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr.624951–4969. 10.1080/10408398.2021.1879730
43
XuJ.WangH.ZhuZ.JiF.YinX.HongQ.et al (2016). Isolation and characterization of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens ZDS-1: Exploring the degradation of zearalenone by Bacillus spp.Food Control68244–250. 10.1016/j.foodcont.2016.03.030
44
XuK. Z.YinL. J.DingZ. W.WangY. J.JiaA. Q. (2024). Ytnp: One novel quorum quenching enzyme from Bacillus amyloliquefaciens W11 inhibits biofilms and spoilage of white radish by Serratia marcescens.LWT198:116058. 10.1016/j.lwt.2024.116058
45
XuS.WangY.HuJ.ChenX.QiuY.ShiJ.et al (2021). Isolation and characterization of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens MQ01, a bifunctional biocontrol bacterium with antagonistic activity against Fusarium graminearum and biodegradation capacity of zearalenone.Food Control130:108259. 10.1016/j.foodcont.2021.108259
46
YangS. B.ZhengH. C.XuJ. Y.ZhaoX. Y.ShuW. J.LiX. M.et al (2021). New biotransformation mode of zearalenone identified in Bacillus subtilis Y816 revealing a novel zen conjugate.J. Agric. Food Chem.697409–7419. 10.1021/acs.jafc.1c01817
47
YangX.LiF.NingH.ZhangW.NiuD.ShiZ.et al (2022). Screening of pig-derived zearalenone-degrading bacteria through the zearalenone challenge model, and their degradation characteristics.Toxins (Basel)14:224. 10.3390/toxins14030224
48
YuY.WuH.TangY.QiuL. (2012). Cloning, expression of a peroxiredoxin gene from Acinetobacter sp. SM04 and characterization of its recombinant protein for zearalenone detoxification.Microbiol. Res.167121–126. 10.1016/j.micres.2011.07.004
49
ZhaiC.YuY.HanJ.HuJ.HeD.ZhangH.et al (2022). Isolation, characterization, and application of Clostridium sporogenes F39 to degrade zearalenone under anaerobic conditions.Foods11:1194. 10.3390/foods11091194
50
ZhangJ.QinX.GuoY.ZhangQ.MaQ.JiC.et al (2020). Enzymatic degradation of deoxynivalenol by a novel bacterium, Pelagibacterium halotolerans ANSP101.Food Chem. Toxicol.140:111276. 10.1016/j.fct.2020.111276
51
ZhangM. M.ZhangW. F.DongB. X.HanX. M.YangJ. D.LiuF. Y. (2024). Composition characteristics of antibiotic resistance genes in sediments and water in Dongzhaigang mangrove.Southwest China J. Agric. Sci.37633–640. 10.16213/j.cnki.scjas.2024.3.019
52
ZinedineA.SorianoJ. M.MoltóJ. C.MañesJ. (2007). Review on the toxicity, occurrence, metabolism, detoxification, regulations and intake of zearalenone: An oestrogenic mycotoxin.Food Chem. Toxicol.451–18. 10.1016/j.fct.2006.07.030
Summary
Keywords
zearalenone, Priestia megaterium, biodegradation, enzyme, whole-genome sequence
Citation
Meng D, Xu K-Z, Hou H-J, Liu J-B, Deng D-D, Li J-M, Fang Y-K, Zhu X-Q and Pei D-L (2025) A Priestia megaterium MF3 with high-efficiency zearalenone degradation: functional genomic insights and mechanistic exploration. Front. Microbiol. 16:1630165. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2025.1630165
Received
17 May 2025
Accepted
16 June 2025
Published
01 July 2025
Volume
16 - 2025
Edited by
Pankaj Kumar, Maa Shakumbhari University, India
Reviewed by
Timothy Satterlee, USDA/ARS Toxicology and Mycotoxin Research Unit, United States
Hongmin Zhen, Beijing Technology and Business University, China
Lourenço Vitor Silva Ferreira, Universidade Federal de São João del-Rei, Brazil
Chunwei Wang, Shanxi Agricultural University, China
Updates
Copyright
© 2025 Meng, Xu, Hou, Liu, Deng, Li, Fang, Zhu and Pei.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Kai-Zhong Xu, xu-kaizhong@foxmail.com
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.