ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Microbiol.
Sec. Virology
Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2025.1632581
This article is part of the Research TopicThe Future of HIV Care: Innovative Treatment StrategiesView all articles
Unique Genetic Signatures in HIV-1 Subtype A1 and A1D recombinant Envelope Glycoprotein distinguish Contemporary Transmitted/Founder Viruses from Historical Strains in East Africa
Provisionally accepted- 1Viral Pathogens, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine Uganda Research Unit, Medical Research Council (Uganda), Entebbe, Uganda
- 2College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda
- 3Infectious Diseases Institute, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda
- 4Uganda Virus Research Institute (UVRI), Entebbe, Uganda
- 5Theoretical Division, Los Alamos National Laboratory (DOE), Los Alamos, New Mexico, United States
- 6Kenya Medical Research Institute (KEMRI), Nairobi, Kenya
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
The envelope glycoprotein (Env) of HIV-1 Transmitted/Founder (T/F) viruses in subtypes B and C carries distinct genetic signatures that enhance transmission fitness, augment infectivity and immune evasion. However, there is limited data on such signatures in T/F subtypes A1, D and A1D recombinants that predominate East Africa's HIV epidemic. We used phylogenetically corrected approaches to detect distinct genetic signatures by comparing 44 contemporary HIV-1 T/F Envs with 229 historical Envs of the same subtype in East Africa. Subtype analysis based on the full-length Env gene of contemporary T/F viruses revealed a high proportion of subtype A1, followed by A1D recombinants, and fewer subtype D. Signature analysis revealed that the contemporary subtype A1 T/Fs were more likely to select distinct amino acids, including M22 in the signal peptide, R82 in gp120, A172 in the V2 loop, E230 in the glycosite 230, K275 in the D loop, Y317 in the V3 loop, K476 and N477 in the CD4 contact site, when compared with the historical Envs (q-value < 0.2). Conversely, the contemporary subtype A1 T/F Envs were less likely to carry the amino acids Q432 in the CD4 contact site, and the L784 signature within the LLP-2 (q-value < 0.2). The A1D recombinant T/Fs were more likely to select the D620 in the C-helix, but under selected the L34 in gp120, P299 in the V3 loop and Y643 in the Heptad repeat-2, compared to the historical Envs (q-value < 0.2). The distinct signature sites reported in this study may contribute to the successful establishment of acute infection as well as the persistence of long-term infection. Therefore, effective therapeutics and vaccines may target these distinct amino acid signatures especially for the East African region as it may be necessary to employ subtype-specific vaccines according to the subtype distribution.
Keywords: HIV-1, envelope, Subtype A1, A1D recombinants, Signature, Transmitted/founder, genetic
Received: 21 May 2025; Accepted: 17 Jul 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Kato, Kapaata, Galiwango, Nakyanzi, Ndekezi, Natwijuka, Omara, Obuku, Foley, Kaleebu, Nduati and Balinda. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Frank Kato, Viral Pathogens, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine Uganda Research Unit, Medical Research Council (Uganda), Entebbe, Uganda
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.