Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

METHODS article

Front. Microbiol.

Sec. Infectious Agents and Disease

Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2025.1637776

This article is part of the Research TopicRapid and Efficient Analytical Technologies for Pathogen DetectionView all 6 articles

A Simple, Low-Cost, and Highly Efficient Protocol for Rapid Isolation of Pathogenic Bacteria from Human Blood

Provisionally accepted
  • 1University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, United States
  • 2University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Bacteremia is a serious clinical condition in which pathogenic bacteria enter the bloodstream, putting patients at risk of septic shock and necessitating aggressive antibiotic treatment. Choosing the most effective antibiotic is crucial not only for resolving the infection but also for minimizing side effects, such as dysbiosis in the healthy microbiome and mitigating the evolution of antibiotic resistance. This requires rapid identification of the pathogen and antibiotic susceptibility testing, yet these processes are inherently slow in standard clinical microbiology labs due to reliance on growth-based assays. Although alternative methods exist, they are rarely adopted in clinical settings because they involve complex protocols and high costs for retraining the personnel and new equipment. Here, we present an optimized and straightforward protocol for the rapid and efficient isolation of bacterial pathogens directly from blood samples, without disrupting standard laboratory workflows. This cost-effective approach utilizes commonly available laboratory equipment and enables direct bacterial cell isolation. By eliminating the need for traditional blood culture steps, it significantly reduces diagnostic delays while remaining fully compatible with downstream bacterial identification analyses. Our protocol achieves over 70% bacteria isolation efficiency within 30 minutes, remained effective at low bacterial concentrations (1-10 bacteria/0.3 mL blood), and preserved bacterial viability with no notable change in growth lag times. We validated the protocol on several clinically relevant bacterial species, including Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Staphylococcus aureus. These findings highlight our protocol's potential utility in clinical and research settings, facilitating timely cultures and minimizing diagnostic delays. Importantly, the ability to rapidly isolate pathogens may offer critical benefits where timely diagnosis directly influences outcomes. For instance, in a neutropenic cancer patient presenting with fever and signs of sepsis, immediate broad-spectrum antibiotics are typically administered empirically. However, without rapid identification of disease causing pathoens, the risk of inappropriate therapy remains high. By enabling pathogen isolation within 30 minutes, our protocol can facilitate same-day targeted therapy using molecular or spectrometry-based identification methods, improving early treatment decisions, minimizing exposure to ineffective antibiotics, and potentially reducing ICU admissions and mortality.

Keywords: rapid diagnostics, Bacteria isolation, bloodstream infections, Bacteremia, antibiotic susceptibility testing

Received: 29 May 2025; Accepted: 24 Jul 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 SEVDE COSKUN, Toprak and Quick. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: FATMA SEVDE COSKUN, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, United States

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.