Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Microbiol.

Sec. Antimicrobials, Resistance and Chemotherapy

Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2025.1645341

Optimal Effective Concentration Combinations and synergy evaluations for binary antimicrobial combinations in vitro

Provisionally accepted
  • 1Universitatsklinikum Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
  • 2University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Background This study provides a comparative analysis of Optimal Effective Concentration Combinations (OPECCs) and synergy evaluations derived from the Loewe additivity and Bliss independence models for binary antimicrobial combinations in vitro. The aim was to provide a comprehensive perspective on the utility of these strategies in analyzing binary antimicrobial combinations and their implications for effective therapeutic strategies. This study contributes to the understanding of methodological differences in evaluating antimicrobial combinations. Methods Binary combinations of Benzalkonium chloride, Chlorhexidine, Cetylpyridinium chloride, and Ciprofloxacin were tested against E. coli and S. aureus. OPECCs and synergy evaluations were derived from OD-measurements after 3 hours of of aerobic incubation at 37 °C in Mueller-Hinton medium. Results All OPECCs were determinable for each binary combination pair. For each binary concentration component, the OPECC lay below the respective minimum effective concentration in single application. The synergy scores obtained with both models ranged from -13.4 (antagonistic) to 11.2 (synergistic), with consistently higher scores for the Bliss model. However, the concentration pairs at maximum synergy, determined using the respective matrices, showed inconsistent antibacterial assessments. No pattern could be derived regarding the antibacterial effect of these concentrations in relation to the OPECCs, nor between the two synergy models. The general synergy score of a combination also does not inevitably reflect the results at effective concentrations. Conclusion The comparison demonstrated that the assumptions like "additivity" or "independence" underlying these models can result in concentration pairs at maximum synergy that may not necessarily be effective. As a consequence, the synergy evaluation methods tested do not account for the effectiveness of the assessed concentration pairs. In contrast, the model-independent OPECC method identifies effective concentration combinations directly from experimental data, without reliance on interaction assumptions or further data processing. The separating curve is based on directly measured optical density (OD) values of the binary concentration combinations, thus representing the real situation. By offering an alternative or complementary approach to existing models, the OPECC method may support more accurate identification of effective antimicrobial combinations and provide valuable insights for the development of optimized treatment strategies in the context of rising antimicrobial resistance.

Keywords: Optimal Effective Concentration Combination (OPECC), Bliss independence, Loewe additivity, Synergy, effective antimicrobial combination, Bacterial resistance, Checkerboard Assay

Received: 17 Jun 2025; Accepted: 27 Aug 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Greger, Greger, Hiller and Maisch. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence:
Karl-Anton Hiller, Universitatsklinikum Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
Tim Maisch, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.