ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Microbiol.
Sec. Virology
Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2025.1656797
Rotavirus A Genotype Diversity and Antigenic Profile in Central Ethiopia: Implications for Rotarix® Vaccine Efficacy
Provisionally accepted- 1Department of Animal Biosciences, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden
- 2Biotechnology Research Center, Institute of Advanced Sciences and Technology, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
- 3College of Veterinary Sciences, Mekelle University, Mekelle, Ethiopia
- 4Department of Animal Health and Antibiotic Strategies, Swedish Veterinary Agency, Uppsala, Sweden
- 5Department of medical biochemistry and microbiology, Uppsala, Sweden
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Introduction: Rotavirus remains a leading cause of severe gastroenteritis in children globally, including in Ethiopia. Despite the introduction of vaccines, high mutation and reassortment rates contribute to genetic diversity and potential vaccine escape. This study aimed to assess the distribution and genetic characteristics of rotavirus A (RVA) strains in children under five with diarrhea in central Ethiopia, with comparison to the Rotarix® vaccine strain. Methods: Stool samples were collected from children under five years of age presenting with diarrhea at health centers in Debre Berhan and Addis Ababa between April 2022 and December 2023. RVA was detected using quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR). Genotyping was performed by Sanger sequencing of the VP7 and VP4 genes. Phylogenetic analysis was performed in MEGA X software using the maximum likelihood method with 1000 bootstrap replicates, using reference sequences retrieved from the GenBank database. Amino acid sequences of these proteins were compared with those of the Rotarix® vaccine strain to identify substitutions in key antigenic regions. Results: RVA was detected in 30 of 247 samples (12.14%), with 28 successfully genotyped. G9 was the predominant G genotype (50%), followed by G12 (10.2%), G2 (7.1%), G1 (3.6%), and G3 (3.6%); 25% remained untyped. P[4] was the most common P genotype (28.6%), followed by P[6] (21.4%) and P[8] (17.9%), with 32.1% untyped. The most frequent G/P combinations were G9P[4] (35%), G12P[6] (13%), and G9P[8] (9%). Compared to Rotarix®, the circulating G2, G3, G9, and G12 strains showed 18, 12, 13, and 17 amino acid substitutions, respectively, within the 29-residue VP7 epitopes. The P[8], P[4], and P[6] strains exhibited 4, 9, and 18 substitutions, respectively, within the 28 VP4 neutralizing epitope residues. Phylogenetic analysis revealed that the current identified virus mainly clusters with strains previously reported from Ethiopia, indicating a shared evolutionary origin. Conclusion: The dominance of the G9P[4] genotype, together with substantial amino acid substitutions in the current circulating RVA strains that diverge from the G1P[8] Rotarix® strain, may compromise vaccine performance. These findings underscore the need to evaluate vaccine efficacy, maintain molecular surveillance, and incorporate broader genotype coverage in future vaccine design.
Keywords: Central Ethiopia, Gastroenteritis, Rotavirus, Molecular Epidemiology, VP7 and VP4 genes, vaccine efficacy
Received: 30 Jun 2025; Accepted: 15 Sep 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Redda, Adamu, Bergholm, Lindahl, Blomström, Berg and Sisay Tessema. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Yisehak Tsegaye Redda, yisehak.tsegaye.redda@slu.se
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.