ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Microbiol.
Sec. Terrestrial Microbiology
Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2025.1657143
This article is part of the Research TopicUnveiling Microbiome Interactions and Functions in Soil HotspotsView all 13 articles
Microbial and Chemical Predictors of Methane Release from a Stratified Thermokarst Permafrost Hotspot Authors
Provisionally accepted- 1University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, United States
- 2University of Colorado Boulder Institute of Arctic and Alpine Research, Boulder, United States
- 3Sandia National Laboratories California, Livermore, United States
- 4Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, United States
- 5Sandia National Laboratories (DOE), Albuquerque, United States
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Soils are dynamic interfaces that can act as both sources and sinks of methane (CH₄), yet the microbial processes underlying these fluxes remain poorly constrained in current Earth system models—particularly in thawing permafrost regions. Accurately quantifying subsurface microbial activity and its response to environmental variation is essential for improving predictions of CH₄ emissions under shifting temperature regimes. Here, we explore the potential of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) as early chemical indicators of microbial processes driving CH₄ production within a thermokarst-associated CH₄ hotspot. Field surveys at Big Trail Lake, a young thermokarst feature in central Alaska, identified localized CH₄ emission zones. Anaerobic soil laboratory microcosms from 50, 200, and 400 cm depths were incubated at -4°C, 5°C, and 12°C to simulate freeze–thaw transitions. Methane flux increased markedly with temperature, and microbial community shifts revealed Methanosarcina spp. as the dominant methanogen, particularly at 200 cm. VOC profiling showed strong depth- and temperature-dependent patterns, with the 50 cm layer exhibiting the greatest chemical diversity. Notably, 200 cm soils produced VOC signatures overlapping with those from pure Methanosarcina acetivorans C2A cultures, supporting the identification of shared metabolites linked to active methanogenesis. Extended 60-day incubations confirmed temperature-sensitive CH₄ production. Carbon isotopic enrichment in CH₄ was unexpectedly strong with warming, and metagenomic detection of ANME-associated markers–including multiheme cytochromes and formate dehydrogenases–supports temperature-sensitive anaerobic oxidation of methane as a significant control on isotopic signatures. Calculated Q₁₀ values for methanogenesis exceeded typical values for boreal soils, highlighting an underappreciated temperature responsiveness of Arctic methanogens. Together, these results demonstrate that VOCs can serve as informative biomarkers of subsurface microbial activation and offer a novel diagnostic tool for detecting early-stage CH₄ hotspot formation. Incorporating such chemically and biologically resolved metrics into process-based models will be critical for improving forecasts of CH₄ release from thawing permafrost landscapes.
Keywords: methane hotspot, Thermokarst soils, methanotrophy, Microbial VOCs, Permafrost thaw, Biogeochemical modeling, Methane isotopes, carbon cycling
Received: 01 Jul 2025; Accepted: 26 Aug 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Rozmiarek, Yang, Schambach, Bennett, Caro, Sammon, Whiting, Miller, Ricken, Bigler, Jayne, Fukuyama, Jones and Smallwood. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Chuck Randall Smallwood, Sandia National Laboratories (DOE), Albuquerque, United States
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.