Abstract
The United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) has projected that by 2050, nearly 90% of the world's soil resources will be at risk due to factors such as erosion, overuse of agrochemicals, and industrial pollution. As soil sustains over 95% of the global food supply, such degradation poses a critical threat to food security and ecosystem stability. Among the myriad environmental pollutants, heavy metals (HMs) like arsenic (As), lead (Pb), cadmium (Cd), and chromium (Cr) stand out as insidious threats to the environment. Addressing this issue demands the adoption of eco-friendly and sustainable remediation strategies. Microbial-assisted bioremediation particularly involving plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPRs) has emerged as a promising approach to enhance HMs detoxification while supporting plant health and soil recovery. In this review, we compile and critically evaluate current literature on PGPR-mediated bioremediation, with a focus on mechanisms of HMs tolerance and detoxification, the impact of PGPRs on soil health, and their role in promoting plant growth in contaminated environments. Overall, aims of the study is to provide a holistic understanding of microbial strategies for managing HMs pollution in soil–plant systems, offering a sustainable path forward for agricultural productivity and environmental restoration.
1 Introduction
Heavy metals (HMs) are metallic elements characterized by relative atomic mass >40, specific density of 5 g/cm3, and specific gravity 4–5 times higher than water (Timothy and Williams, 2019). These are natural components of environment but their toxicity, bioaccumulation, long-term stability, non-biodegradable, and persistent nature poses a significant environmental concern. In addition to natural sources, anthropogenic activities like industrial waste, sewage disposal, chemical fertilizers, pesticides, insecticides, agricultural runoff, ore mining, smelting, fuels, and electronic waste substantially contribute to HMs contamination (). According to the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR), As, Pb, Cd, and Cr are among the highly toxic HMs, ranking 1st, 2nd, 7th, and 17th position on the list of hazardous substances. Globally, the estimated annual production of these metals is 36,000–45,000 tons for As, 4.8 × 106 tons for Pb, 20,000–24,000 tons for Cd, and 18 × 106-30 × 106 tons for Cr (Rahman and Singh, 2019). HMs negatively impacts soil physicochemical properties, ultimately compromising plant health and reducing crop yield. (; ; ; Vasilachi et al., 2023). In addition, the transfer of HMs through trophic levels—from contaminated water and soil to food crops—poses significant health risks to humans. This bioaccumulation can disrupt the normal functioning of vital systems, including the central nervous, respiratory, reproductive, and gastrointestinal systems, as well as adversely affect liver and cardiac function (; Waqas et al., 2024). To address this issue, various chemical and physical methods such as precipitation, ion exchange, chemical leaching, oxidation-reduction, immobilization, electro-kinetics, and vitrification have been used for soil remediation, but they often generate toxic sludge, and disrupt soil quality (Sharma et al., 2018; ). Due to these drawbacks, research has increasingly shifted towards microbial-based bioremediation approaches, which are recognized for their cost-effectiveness, environmental sustainability, and minimal ecological disruption ().
Microorganisms are ubiquitous in nature and constitute a fundamental component of the ecosystem, engaging in intricate interactions with soil chemical contaminants (). The application of rhizosphere-associated microbes as soil amendments has demonstrated significant potential in enhancing plant growth, primarily through improvements in soil physicochemical properties and root system architecture. Numerous PGPRs, including members of the genera Bacillus, Serratia, Arthrobacter, Pseudomonas, Rhodococcus, Enterobacter, Acinetobacter, and Ochrobactrum, have been widely reported for their dual functionality—promoting plant growth and facilitating HMs detoxification (; ; ). While their role in mitigating HMs-induced phytotoxicity is well-studied, practical insights into their impact on long-term soil health remain limited. Similarly, plant-focused studies often emphasize early-stage responses, with insufficient insights in understanding whole-plant physiology, yield performance, and molecular mechanisms under HMs stress. Therefore, the present review aims to comprehensively evaluate the potential of PGPRs in enhancing soil health, and to elucidate interactive roles in mitigating heavy metal stress in soil–plant systems.
2 HMs tolerance and their mechanism of detoxification by PGPRs
PGPRs employ a multitude of mechanisms to mediate HMs detoxification including biosorption, bioaccumulation, biodegradation, biotransformation, precipitation, complexation, redox reactions, metal chelation via siderophores, complexation through exopolysaccharides (EPS) production, active efflux, and influx transporters (). Numerous studies, as shown in Table 1, and Figure 1 have documented on PGPRs, HMs tolerance, bioaccumulation potential of various PGPRs strains, and microbe-based bioremediation, the molecular mechanism underpinning these processes—particularly at the genomic and transcriptomic levels—remains relatively underexplored. To bridge this gap, this section critically highlights recent investigations that delve into the molecular-level insights of PGPRs, with a focus on the identification of key metal resistance genes, operons, transport systems, and regulatory elements that orchestrate their survival and function in metal-contaminated environments.
Table 1
| PGPRs | HMs Used | HMs tolerance range | HMs bioaccumulation efficiency | Time of HMs bioaccumulation | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pseudomonas aeruginosa | Cadmium Chloride | 2,200 ppm | – | – | |
| Lead | 1,200 ppm | – | – | ||
| Brevundimonas diminuta | Sodium arsenate As (V) | 150 mM | 20–21% | 24–36 h | Singh et al., 2016 |
| Sodium arsenite As (III) | 20 mM | 14–38% | |||
| Enterobacter sp. | Cadmium | 3,000 μg/mL | 73% | 72 h | |
| Lead | 2,500 μg/mL | – | – | ||
| Arsenic | 1,050 μg/mL | – | – | ||
| Bacillus aryabhattai | As (V) | 100 mM | 41% | 24–36 h | |
| As (III) | 20 mM | 26% | |||
| Cellulosimicrobium sp. | Potassium chromate | 800 mg/L | Reduced 100 mg/L | 48 h | Tirry et al., 2018 |
| Bacillus subtilis BM2 | Lead acetate | 2,000 μg/mL | – | – | Rizvi et al., 2019 |
| Bacillus flexus | As (V), As (III) | 150 and 70 mmol L−1 | Above 80% [As (V)] | 72 h | |
| Acinetobacter junii | 60% [As (V)] | ||||
| Bacillus cereus 2M1 | Lead acetate | 800 ppm | – | – | |
| Bacillus cereus 3M1 | |||||
| Bacillus pseudomycoides 3M3 | Lead acetate, Cadmium nitrate tetrahydrate | 800 ppm (Pb), 300 ppm (Cd) | |||
| Enterobacter tabaci 4M9 | Cadmium nitrate tetrahydrate | 300 ppm | |||
| Pseudomonas plecoglossicida 6M2 | Sodium arsenite | 1,700 ppm | |||
| Bacillus tropicus | Lead nitrate | 1,400 ppm | – | – | |
| Stenotrophomonas sp. | Lead (II) chloride, Potassium chromate | 500–1,000 μg/mL (Cr) and 1,000–1,600 μg/mL (Pb) | 68.54% (Cr), and 85.3% (Pb) | 24–72 h | |
| Klebsiella pneumoniae | 65.98% (Cr), and 65.85% (Pb) | ||||
| Staphylococcus sp. | 71.45 % (Cr), and 65.85 % (Pb) | ||||
| Bacillus cereus BPS-9 | Lead nitrate | 2,400 ppm | 79.26 % | 72 h | Sharma and Shukla, 2021 |
| Cadmium Chloride | 500 ppm | – | – | ||
| Chromium | 600 ppm | – | – | ||
| Pseudomonas sp. | Lead nitrate | Above 50 mg/mL | Above 80 % | 40 h | Vélez et al., 2021 |
| Bacillus subtilis | Potassium dichromate | 25 ppm | – | – | |
| Enterobacter cloacae | Cadmium chloride | 4,000 μg/mL | 72.11 % | 72 h | |
| Bacillus subtilis | Cadmium nitrate | 100 ppm | 92.3 % | 1–144 h | Rocco et al., 2023 |
| Lead acetate | 500 ppm | 100 % | |||
| Bacillus velezensis QZG6 | Cadmium chloride | 100–400 μM | – | – | |
| Bacillus altitudinis | Lead acetate | 15 mM | 96 % | 48 h | |
| Bacillus cereus NM8 | Potassium dichromate | 100 μg/mL | – | – | |
| Bacillus subtilis NM28 | |||||
| Bacillus paramycoides | Cadmium chloride | 2,000 ppm | 81.79 % | 72 h | Zainab et al., 2024 |
| Bacillus tequilensis | 83.78% | ||||
| Stenotrophomonas maltophilia | Lead nitrate | 18 mM | 78.4% (removal efficiency) | 70 min | |
| Bacillus altitudinis 41KF2b | Chromium | 100 ppm | 51.0% | 120 h | |
| Bacillus tropicus | 45.1% | ||||
| Providencia rettgri | 19.1% | ||||
| Pseudomonas sp. | Lead | 500 ppm | 61.3% | 72 h |
List of HMs tolerance and bioaccumulation ability of previously reported PGPR strains.
Figure 1
Xu et al. (2018) work demonstrated remarkable tolerance of Arthrobacter sp. PGP41, to 1.58 mM Cd by secreting various low-molecular-weight organic acids, including oxalic, tartaric, formic, malic, citric, and succinic acids, which likely contributed to Cd chelation and detoxification through metal complexation. In a genomic study by , Pantoea agglomerans C1 strain exhibited high tolerance to As (V) up to 100 mM. Genomic analysis revealed the presence of key arsenic resistance determinants including arsenite efflux transporter (arsB), arsenate reductase (arsC), arsenite efflux pump (acr3), and transcriptional regulator (arsR), supporting a genetically encoded mechanism for arsenic detoxification. reported that Stenotrophomonas maltophilia SY-2 strain tolerated 1.0 mM Cd and exhibited a Cd biosorption capacity of 35.7% within 24 h. The study also noted enhanced siderophore production under Cd stress, and Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy confirmed the involvement of functional groups such as carboxyl, amide, and phosphate moieties in metal ion binding on the bacterial surface.
Furthermore, study elucidated that Pseudomonas qingdaonensis ZCR6 strain tolerated 5 mM Cd and genome-wide analysis confirmed the presence of cobalt-zinc-cadmium resistance genes (czcA, czcB, and czcC) that helps in the transport of divalent cations, and detoxification of Zn2+, Co2+, and Cd2+. Moreover, reported that Kocuria rhizophila (14ASP) endophytic strain tolerated Cr (500 ppm), Pb (200 ppm), and Cd (50 ppm), following 6–7 days of incubation. Genomic insights revealed the presence of chromate transporter (chrA), lead resistance (pbrA), and cadmium resistance (cadB) genes, indicating a broad-spectrum HMs resistance capability.
More recently, Tatung and Deb (2024) reported two promising isolates—Bacillus cereus (TSU3) and Pseudomonas koreensis (TSU7), that could tolerate 8,070 μg/mL Cr and 570 μg/mL Cd, respectively. Interestingly, also reported that Bacillus velezensis (C3-3) and Cytobacillus gottheilii (T106) showed resistance to 5 mM of Cd due to the presence of Co/Zn/Cd genes in its genome (czcA, cusA, cnrA, czcD, zitB).
In conclusion, these investigations provide critical insights into the molecular frameworks that underpin PGPR-mediated HMs detoxification. Such knowledge not only advances our understanding of microbial adaptation and resistance but also lays the foundation for restoring soil health and promoting sustainable plant growth in HMs-stressed environments.
3 Effect of PGPRs on HMs contaminated soil health
Soil is a fundamental component of terrestrial ecosystems and plays a pivotal role in sustaining agricultural productivity. However, excessive HMs contamination significantly disrupts soil structure, pH, porosity, density, texture, electrical conductivity, and water holding capacity. It also impairs biological functions including litter decomposition, organic matter stability, nutrients availability, carbon mineralization, nitrogen transformation processes, enzymatic activity, and the microbial diversity (; ; Srivastava et al., 2017). In addition to this, different PGPRs have been reported for their role in HMs bioaccumulation, improving soil quality, and enzyme activities that helps in nutrient recycling, and plant growth. Despite these findings, the important gaps remain in understanding the role of PGPRs in restoring soil health under HM stress.
A notable study by highlights the effect of PGPRs consortia (Rhizobium leguminosarum (M5) + Bacillus simplex + Luteibacter sp. + Variovorax sp.) (I1) and (R. leguminosarum (M5) + Pseudomonas fluorescens (K23) + Luteibacter sp. + Variovorax sp.) (I5) on Pb, and Cd polluted soil of L. sativus plots. The results showed that I5 inoculum treatment reduces total Pb, and Cd by 46%, and 61%, respectively as compared to uninoculated soil. Moreover, I5 inoculation also significantly enhanced total nitrogen content (N), available phosphorus (P), β-glucosidase, urease and alkaline phosphatase of soil by 35, 100, 16, 12, and 32%, respectively, relative to uninoculated soil. Additionally, also reported that Bacillus sp. QX8 and QX13 treatment under Pb, and Cd contamination significantly improved the soil acid phosphatase, and urease activity by 23, and 22%, respectively as compared to untreated soil. Furthermore, Silva et al. (2021) findings showed that PGPRs consortia treatment increased soil respiration rate, and microbial biomass C (MBC) under 320 mg/kg Cr stress. Complementary findings were reported by , who evaluated the efficacy of Bacillus sp. ZC3-2-1 in Cd-contaminated soils. The strain decreased bioavailable Cd levels by 39.3% and significantly boosted protease and alkaline phosphatase activities by 45.8, and 6.4%, respectively in the soil. Moreover, treatment with ZC3-2-1 also led to a marked increase in bacterial alpha diversity and the relative abundance of beneficial taxa such as Actinobacteria, Proteobacteria, and Bacteroidetes, that helps in nitrogen and phosphorus cycling in HMs contaminated soil. Further, demonstrated the remediation potential of a biofertilizer formulation comprising Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Bacillus firmus in HM-polluted soils. The biofertilizer significantly improved key soil physicochemical properties, including available N, P, K, and organic matter content. Enzymatic activities of dehydrogenase, alkaline phosphatase, and β-D-glucosidase were also substantially enhanced in biofertilizer-treated soils compared to control plots. Recent study by showed that Pb resistant Pseudomonas sp. and Bacillus sp. treatment significantly decreased the Pb content, improved the available P, and K in the Pb contaminated rhizosphere soil.
Collectively, these studies underscore the promising role of PGPRs in mitigating heavy metal toxicity, enhancing nutrient cycling, and restoring soil biological activity, thereby contributing to sustainable soil health management in contaminated agroecosystems.
4 Effect of PGPRs on plant growth under HMs stress
HMs accumulation in soil adversely impairs plant growth and development by disrupting key morpho-physiological, biochemical, and molecular processes. Toxic metal ions interfere with root architecture, reduce seed germination rates, induce nutrient imbalances, and cause chlorosis and impaired photosynthetic efficiency. At the cellular level, elevated HMs stress promotes excessive generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS), leading to oxidative damage. This includes lipid peroxidation of cell membranes, degradation of structural and functional proteins, and alterations in DNA integrity. The schematic representation of these pathways is presented in Figure 2. Collectively, these effects compromise plant vitality and significantly reduce crop productivity (). However, PGPRs have been extensively reported to mitigate HMs toxicity by reducing their bioavailability. In addition to metal immobilization, PGPRs also enhance plant stress resilience by modulating antioxidant defense systems, regulating stress-responsive signaling pathways, and promoting growth by facilitating nutrient availability, phytohormone, exopolysaccharide (EPS) production, and ACC-deaminase activity (; Wang et al., 2024). In this context, key studies elucidating the molecular and physiological pathways targeted by PGPRs in different plants under HM stress are discussed in the following sections and summarized in Table 2.
Figure 2
Table 2
| PGPRs | Plant | HMs contamination | Effect of PGPR on HMs uptake in plants | Effect of PGPR inoculation on plant growth | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pseudomonas gessardii | Helianthus annus | 600 mg/kg Pb (NO3)2 | 62.42% reduction in Pb translocation from root to shoot | Chlorophyll a, b, and total chlorophyll content, grain weight increased by 47.36%, 37.30%, 44.02%, 15.93% | Raza Altaf et al., (2021) |
| Pseudomonas fluorescens, Pseudomonas putida, and Bacillus safensis | Brassica napus and Trifolium repens | 400, 800, and 1,200 mg/kg Pb | – | Increased number of pods per plant, chlorophyll a, b, carotenoid, proline content, SOD, and GR activity | Shah et al., (2020) |
| Bacillus gibsonii, and Bacillus xiamenensis | Sesbania sesban L. | Cd (5.1 ppm), Cr (26.4 ppm), and Pb (42 ppm) | Increased Pb, and Cr uptake | Increased chlorophyll, carotenoid content, SOD, POD enzymatic actiivty | Zainab et al., (2021) |
| Pseudomonas sp. | Anethum graveolens L. | 0, 100, 400 mg/kg Pb (NO3)2 | Reduced Pb uptake | Total carbohydrate, proline, chlorophyll content, CAT, POD activity was enhanced | Rahbari et al., (2021) |
| Morganella morganii (ABT3, and ABT9) | Arabidopsis thaliana | 1.5, and 2.5 mM Pb (NO3)2 | – | Increased shoot, root fresh, dry weight, length, chlorophyll content, quantum yield, SOD, POD, and CAT activity | |
| Enterobacter cloacae | Oryza sativa (IET-15,191 Cd sensitive) | 0–400 μg/mL | Reduced Cd content by 95 μg/g fresh weight | Improved morphological parameters, total sugar, protein, proline, chlorophyll content, α-amylase, protease, and antioxidant activity. Significant reduction in MDA, and ethylene level in plants | |
| Consortia* | Oryza sativa (IR64 Variety) | 800 mg/L Pb | 45% reduction in Pb content | Chlorophyll content increased by 25%, MDA, and ROS content reduced by 50%, and 13% | Ubaidillah et al., 2023 |
| Pseudomonas fluorescence | Cicer arietinum L. | 400 μg/kg Cd | 37% decrease in Cd deposition in roots | Increased seed germination (10%), root length (25%), plant length (26.5%), chlorophyll a (34%), b (29%), carotenoid (41%), seed protein (20%), content, and seed yield (26%), | Syed et al., 2023 |
| S2, S5, and S10 Pb tolerant PGPR | Brassica juncea | 300, 600, 900 mg/kg Pb | Ameliorated Pb uptake in plant by 9.2%. 26% reduction of Pb in seeds | Improved agronomic growth parameters (number of pods, seeds, yield per plant), chlorophyll a, b, carotenoid, proline content, SOD, CAT, APX, and GR activity | |
| Bacillus sp. Kz5 and Enterobacter sp. Kz15 | Brassica juncea | 5, and 20 mg/kg Cd | Increased Cd uptake | Increased shoot, root biomass, and photosynthetic activity | Zhang et al., 2023 |
| Priestia flexa | Oryza sativa | 25 μM As (III), and 100 μM As (V) | 53.02% reduction in As (V), and 38.84% As (III) uptake | Increased shoot length, root length, fresh weight, dry weight, and chlorophyll content, but SOD, CAT, APX, and GPX activity was reduced in the plant | |
| Pseudomonas chengduensis | 31.48% reduction in As (V), and 35.98% As (III) uptake | ||||
| Serratia marcescens DB1 | Oryza sativa L. | 1,000–5,000 μM Cr, and As | 16.55 % reduction in Cr uptake | Increased shoot weight (19.92%), SA content (20.25%). Reduced ABA (12.71%), JA (7%), flavonoid (11.88%), polyphenol (17.58%) level. OsMTP5, OsMTP1, and OsPCS1 expression decreased. | |
| 48.9% reduction in As uptake | Shoot weight (50%), SA content (21.95%), Reduced ABA (30.30%), JA (26.58%), flavonoid (13.35%), polyphenol (25.91%) level. OsMTP1, and OsPCS1 expression decreased | ||||
| Bacillus subtilis | Oryza sativa L. | 15 mg/kg As | 50% increased As accumulation in plants | GST, CAT, GSH activity, and total thions content was significantly decreased | Ullah et al., 2024 |
| Pseudomonas sp. | Alfalfa | 0.5 mM CdCL2 | – | Enhanced dry weight, chlorophyll a, b, and total chlorophyll content | |
| Bacillus sp. | Oryza sativa L. | 30 ppm As | – | Improved vegetative parameters, chlorophyll content, GPX, CAT activity, total yield, percent grain filling, and 100 seed weight | Roy et al., 2024 |
| Serratia rubidaea SR19 | Cucumis Sativus | 3, 6, and 9 ppm CdCL2 | – | Increased seed germination rate (100% at 9 ppm), root, and radicle length |
Effect of PGPRs application on plant growth under HMs stress.
*Indicate Actinomycetes, Azotobacter sp., Azospirillum sp., Rhizobium sp., Pseudomonas sp., Lactobacillus sp., Bacillus sp., and Streptomyces sp.
4.1 As stress
A study by (Pandey and Bhatt 2016) provided insights into the role of Exiguobacterium sp. As-9 strain in Vigna radiata growth under As stress. Results showed that As-9 inoculation significantly improved the shoot, root biomass, shoot, root length by 22.23, 39, 29.6, and 18.15%, respectively under As (V) stress. Strikingly, bacterial treatment led to a 5-fold reduction in As(V) accumulation, along with a substantial decrease in malondialdehyde (MDA) content −28.02% in shoots and 45.24% in roots—indicating mitigation of oxidative stress induced by arsenic toxicity. Moreover, () also shed light on the role of As resistant Bacillus aryabhattai MCC3374 (AS6) strain on reducing As phytotoxicity in Oryza sativa. Bacterial inoculation significantly enhanced the activity of key seed germination-associated enzymes, including amylase (51.3%) and protease (50%), as well as antioxidant enzymes such as superoxide dismutase (SOD; 27.2%), and catalase (CAT; 62.2%). Interestingly, AS6 strain also exhibited ACC-deaminase activity which is associated with the reduction of ethylene levels in rice seedlings, thereby promoting root elongation. Additionally, (Xiao et al. 2020) demonstrated the efficacy of three PGPR strains Pseudomonas mosselii (S6), Bacillus thuringiensis (S7), and Bacillus sp. JBS-28 (S10) on As accumulation and Oryza sativa growth. Notably, inoculation with strain S10 significantly reduced arsenic accumulation in brown rice by 3.50–26.01% and 9.26–10.50%, while all three PGPR strains (S6, S7, and S10) enhanced grain yield by 10.50–51.30% and 4.83–9.16% under greenhouse and field conditions, respectively. In addition to this, PGPRs application also influenced shoot, and root growth, SOD, and peroxidase (POD) activity in the presence of As.
Recently, (Pandey et al. 2023) illustrated that PGPRs consortia (Bacillus nealsonii, Pseudomonas nitritireducens, Exiguobacterium aestuarii, Bacillus tequilensis, and Microbacterium paraoxydans) significantly improved the shoot, root length, biomass, and total chlorophyll content of Oryza sativa L. plants. Notably, PGPRs treatment led to the downregulation of key antioxidant genes—SOD, CAT, APX (ascorbate peroxidase), GST (glutathione S-transferase), and GPOX (glutathione peroxidase)—suggesting a substantial reduction in oxidative stress within the plant system as compared to As (V)/As (III) treated plants. Moreover, the study by () demonstrated that Bacillus amyloliquefaciens effectively mitigates As toxicity in Oryza sativa by modulating sugar metabolism and associated metabolic pathways. Metabolomic profiling revealed a significant upregulation of key metabolites involved in carbohydrate metabolism, organic acid turnover, fatty acid biosynthesis, and amino acid metabolism under As stress following bacterial inoculation. Transcriptomic analysis further indicated that the expression of key enzymes involved in glycolysis, sugar metabolism, and energy production were significantly upregulated, suggesting enhanced carbon flux. At molecular level, quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) studies result indicated that the expression of As influx, and efflux transporters like Low Silicon 1 (Lsi1), Low Silicon 2 (Lsi2), and Low Silicon 6 (Lsi6) were downregulated after bacterial treatment, thereby restricting As uptake and translocation. These findings highlight the potential of B. amyloliquefaciens in modulating metabolic and transport processes to confer As tolerance in rice.
4.2 Pb stress
Several studies have demonstrated the potential of Pb-tolerant PGPRs in mitigating Pb-induced phytotoxicity and enhancing plant growth under heavy metal stress. Saleem et al. (2018) demonstrated that application of Pb tolerant Pseudomonas strains significantly enhanced the growth performance of Helianthus annuus cultivated in Pb-contaminated soil (900 mg/kg). PGPR inoculation improved root length, root fresh weight, and dry weight by 28, 52, and 74%, respectively, compared to Pb stress alone. Moreover, there was a notable increase in chlorophyll a and b, carotenoid, and proline content, indicating improved photosynthetic efficiency and osmotic adjustment under stress conditions. The treatment also led to a 36% reduction in MDA levels, along with enhancements of SOD, glutathione reductase (GR), APX, and CAT activity by 26, 24, 12, and 26% respectively, suggesting a significant reduction in oxidative damage. Similarly, work also highlights the effect of Pb-resistant PGPR consortia on Lathyrus sativus growth. Results showed that PGPRs inoculation improved the plant biomass, total N, chlorophyll, carotenoid, total polyphenolic, proline, and soluble sugar content under Pb stress. The activity of ROS scavengers (SOD, CAT, APX, and GPX) were also significantly improved in Pb stress, suggesting improved antioxidant defense mechanisms. Furthermore, study showed that application of Lysinibacillus varians and Pseudomonas putida positively influenced growth parameters in Capsicum annuum L. under Pb stress. Specifically, shoot and root lengths were increased by 1.60-, 1.71-, 1.35-, and 1.15-fold, respectively, along with higher chlorophyll content, indicating enhanced photosynthetic performance. Moreover, investigated the efficacy of Pb-resistant Bacillus strains (QX8 and QX13) on Solanum nigrum L. and found a significant improvement in shoot and root dry weights by 1.36–1.96 fold, as determined by Duncan's multiple range test. Furthermore, QX8 and QX13 treatments increased shoot iron concentrations by 55 and 88%, respectively, demonstrating a positive effect on nutrient acquisition in Pb-contaminated soil. In another study, Shabaan et al. (2021) observed enhanced shoot and root lengths by 18 and 84%, respectively, in Pisum sativum L. inoculated with Pseudomonas strains under 750 mg/kg Pb stress, indicating improved biomass accumulation. Moreover, further supported these findings by showing that inoculation with Pseudomonas strains (S1, S2, and S3) enhanced fresh weight, dry weight, chlorophyll content, and APX activity by 36, 26, 18, and 12.24%, respectively, in Vigna unguiculata L. under Pb stress, reflecting improved physiological performance and antioxidative capacity.
A mechanistic insight was provided by , who demonstrated that inoculation with Serratia liquefaciens ZM6 significantly improved morphological, nutritional, and physiological attributes of Glycine max L. under 400 μM Pb stress. Enhanced levels of photosynthetic pigments, osmolytes, enzymatic (CAT, APX, POD, SOD) and non-enzymatic (AsA, GSH) antioxidants were recorded. At the molecular level, qRT-PCR results showed that ZM6 inoculation upregulated the expression of antioxidant genes (CAT, APX, POD, Fe-SOD) and stress-responsive genes [chalcone synthase (CHS7), chalcone isomerase (CHI1A), phenylalanine ammonia-lyase (PAL), isoflavone synthase (IFS2), pyrroline-5-carboxylate synthase (P5CS), and WRKY-type transcription factor (WRKY54)], which are critical for ROS scavenging and biosynthesis of stress-related metabolites such as proline, isoflavonoids, and flavonoids. Notably, yield-related traits including pod number, seed number per pod, and pod weight per plant were also improved. Besides this, also reported that co-inoculation of Pseudomonas and Bacillus species significantly enhanced plant height, biomass accumulation, root development, and antioxidant enzyme activities (SOD, CAT, POD) in Medicago sativa L. grown under extreme Pb concentrations (1,000 and 5,000 mg/L). Additionally, further demonstrated that Pseudomonas fluorescens strains S5 and S10 improved shoot and root length by 18.73–65.80% and 32.77–95.79%, respectively, in Solanum lycopersicum L. under 500 mg/kg Pb stress. The strains also increased proline content and activities of CAT, POD, and SOD, along with a marked reduction (2.41–16.07%) in electrolyte leakage, indicating better maintenance of membrane integrity and cellular homeostasis under Pb-induced oxidative stress.
4.3 Cd stress
Recent studies have highlighted the critical role of PGPRs in mitigating Cd toxicity through modulation of physiological, biochemical, and molecular mechanisms in various crops. reported that Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Burkholderia gladioli mitigates 0.4 mM Cd in Lycopersicon esculentum seedlings by downregulating the expression of metal transporter genes (MT 1-16), thereby reduced Cd uptake in the seedlings. In addition to this, work illustrated that the application of Enterobacter ludwigii, and Exiguobacterium indicum provides Cd tolerance to Oryza sativa seedlings by downregulating the expression of OsMTP1 genes. Sahile et al. (2021) demonstrated that inoculation with Bacillus cereus modulates hormonal signaling in Glycine max under Cd stress, resulting in 23% decrease in abscisic acid (ABA) levels, and a 6–16% increase in salicylic acid (SA) content, indicative of suppression of stress-induced hormonal responses and enhanced defense signaling. Similarly, reported that Bacillus siamensis strain R27 significantly reduced Cd accumulation in Lactuca sativa shoots by 38.9%, while improving shoot fresh weight (29.4%), root fresh weight (40.2%), and total chlorophyll content (45.8%). Gene expression analysis revealed the downregulation of key Cd transporter genes, including iron regulated transporter 1 (IRT1), natural resistance-associated macrophage protein (Nramp1), heavy metal P1B-type ATPase (HMA2, HMA4), zinc regulated transporter, iron regulated transporter like protein (ZIP4, ZIP12), thereby limiting Cd uptake and translocation. In another study, Shahid et al. (2024) observed that Rhizobium fabae SR-22 enhanced seed germination, root and shoot length, and pigment content in Triticum aestivum under 2 mM Cd stress, along with increased activities of antioxidant enzymes—POD (23%), CAT (14%), and APX (34%)—suggesting an improved antioxidative defense system. Pseudomonas geniculata, a Cd-tolerant strain evaluated by , significantly improved growth traits of Vigna radiata under 80 μg/mL Cd exposure, with increases in shoot length (40 %), primary root length (45%), secondary root number (14%), and fresh weight (47%). Under 10 μg/mL Cd, total chlorophyll content rose by 58%, while Cd accumulation, H2O2 levels, and electrolyte leakage decreased by 44, 25, and 20%, respectively.
In line with these findings, showed that Azospirillum brasilense enhanced growth parameters, photosynthetic efficiency, and pigment accumulation (chlorophyll, and carotenoid) in Oryza sativa under 100 μM Cd stress. The bacterium also activated the ascorbate–glutathione (AsA–GSH) cycle by elevating glutathione, ascorbate, and dehydroascorbic acid levels, and significantly upregulated antioxidant genes (SOD, POD, CAT, APX), thereby reinforcing redox homeostasis and mitigating Cd-induced oxidative damage. Moreover, demonstrated that Enterobacter hormaechei X20 enhances Cd tolerance in Lolium perenne by reducing electrolyte leakage and MDA levels, indicating improved membrane stability. Under 450 mg/kg Cd stress, inoculation significantly increased uptake of Fe2+, Cu2+, Mn2+, and Zn2+, and boosted levels of amino acids, fatty acids, organic acids, and sugar alcohols, collectively contributing to improved metabolic and physiological adaptation.
4.4 Cr stress
investigated the potential of Bacillus cereus, Providencia rettgeri, and Myroides odoratimimus in alleviating Cr stress in Sorghum bicolor. Bacterial inoculation resulted in significant enhancement of plant growth and antioxidant enzyme activities (SOD, CAT, and APX), while concurrently reducing the levels of stress indicators such as proline, and MDA. Molecular analysis further revealed that bacterial treatment conferred stress tolerance by modulating stress-related genes. These included antioxidant defense genes (sod, apx1, cat), which were upregulated, and the osmolyte regulation gene p5cs1, involved in proline biosynthesis was found to be downregulated, indicating a shift in stress-response modulation. In a similar context, Tirry et al. (2021) demonstrated that Pseudomonas sp. inoculation significantly enhanced Cr tolerance in Medicago sativa, reflected by substantial increases in shoot (97.6%) and root (95.4%) dry weights and a 25% increase in total chlorophyll content. This growth promotion was accompanied by a marked reduction in oxidative stress markers, including MDA (42.4%), H2O2 (59.35%), and proline (63%). Further supporting the role of beneficial microbes in Cr stress alleviation, reported that treatment with Azospirillum brasilense EMCC1454 enhanced Cr tolerance in Cicer arietinum L. by improving morphological characteristics, photosynthetic pigments, osmolytes (proline and glycine betaine), soluble sugars, and levels of antioxidants such as CAT, APX, SOD, POD, ascorbic acid, and glutathione. Gene expression analysis under 260 μM Cr stress showed significant upregulation of key stress-responsive genes, including CAT, SOD, APX, CHS, dehydration-responsive element-binding protein 2A (DREB2A), CHI, and PAL, indicating the activation of both enzymatic antioxidant defense and stress signaling pathways.
Similarly, evaluated the effect of Mesorhizobium RC3 on Cicer arietinum L. under Cr stress and observed enhanced shoot and root lengths by 12.38 and 10.87%, respectively, along with increased nodule number (6.64%) and dry nodule weight (13.77%). Physiological and yield-related attributes such as chlorophyll content (6.83%), leghaemoglobin (9.47%), protein content (16.83%), and seed yield (27.45%) were also significantly improved in inoculated plants compared to uninoculated controls. In addition, emphasized the synergistic potential of co-inoculating PGPR (Rhizobium sp. and Bacillus sp.) with phosphate-solubilizing bacteria (PSB) (Microbacterium and Pseudomonas sp.) in Vigna radiata L. exposed to 100 ppm Cr stress. The combined microbial treatment significantly improved key growth metrics, including shoot and root length, leaf number, leaf area, and total chlorophyll content, highlighting the advantage of microbial consortia over single inoculants in mitigating Cr-induced phytotoxic effects.
Overall, HMs tolerant PGPRs effectively mitigates metal-induced phytotoxicity by enhancing plant growth, physiological performance, regulating osmolytes accumulation, modulating antioxidant defense, and stress-responsive gene expression, offering a sustainable strategy for stress amelioration. These effects are summarized in the Figure 3.
Figure 3
5 Conclusion and future roadmap
The increasing contamination of agricultural soils with HMs represents a critical threat to environmental quality, agricultural sustainability, and human health. This review synthesizes current knowledge on the mechanisms of HMs mitigation by PGPRs, their role in improving plant growth through enhanced nutrient acquisition, phytohormone production, stress alleviation, and modulation of soil physicochemical properties. However, despite encouraging laboratory results, the widespread application of PGPR-based remediation in real-world agricultural systems remains limited, primarily due to a lack of mechanistic insights, field-scale validation, and scalable deployment strategies. Bridging the lab-to-field gap is essential to enable effective translation of research outcomes into real-world applications. Therefore, future research must focus on conducting long-term, multi-location field trials to evaluate the consistency and adaptability of PGPRs under diverse environmental conditions. The integration of multi-omics approaches such as genomics, transcriptomics, metabolomics, and proteomics can help unravel the molecular and biochemical pathways underlying HMs detoxification and PGPR–plant interactions. In addition, the development of synthetic microbial consortia with complementary functional traits could offer synergistic advantages over single-strain inoculants. Exploring plant genotype-specific responses to PGPRs will further enable tailored bioremediation strategies suited to different crops and soil types. Moreover, long-term ecological monitoring is required to understand the impact of PGPR introduction on native microbial communities and overall soil health.
Bridging the gap between laboratory research and field application through interdisciplinary efforts will be key to unlocking the full potential of PGPRs in advancing climate-resilient and sustainable agriculture. With proper scientific validation and policy support, microbial bioremediation can serve as a cornerstone technology for ensuring food security and environmental sustainability in the 21st century and beyond.
Statements
Author contributions
PK: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Methodology, Software, Validation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. AP: Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – review & editing.
Funding
The author(s) declare that no financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article.
Acknowledgments
The authors express gratitude to the Director, CSIR-IHBT, and Head, Department of Biotechnology, Guru Nanak Dev University for providing the necessary facilities for study. This review article represents CSIR-IHBT publication number 5870. The work was supported by CSIR In-house Project MLP-201 and CSIR Floriculture Mission-Phase-II (HCP 0037) Project.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Generative AI statement
The author(s) declare that no Gen AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.
Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
1
AbdelkrimS.JebaraS. H.SaadaniO.JebaraM. (2018). Potential of efficient and resistant plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria in lead uptake and plant defence stimulation in Lathyrus sativus under lead stress. Plant Biol.20, 857–869. 10.1111/plb.12863
2
AbduN.AbdullahiA. A.AbdulkadirA. (2017). Heavy metals and soil microbes. Environ. Chem. Lett.15, 65–84. 10.1007/s10311-016-0587-x
3
AbdullahiS.HarisH.ZarkasiK. Z.AmirH. G. (2020). Beneficial bacteria associated with Mimosa pudica and potential to sustain plant growth-promoting traits under heavy metals stress. Bioremediat. J.25, 1–21. 10.1080/10889868.2020.1837724
4
AfridiM. S.Van HammeJ. D.BundschuhJ.Sumaira KhanM. N.SalamA.WaqarM.et al. (2021). Biotechnological approaches in agriculture and environmental management-bacterium Kocuria rhizophila 14ASP as heavy metal and salt-tolerant plant growth-promoting strain. Biologia76, 3091–3105. 10.1007/s11756-021-00826-6
5
AhmadA.MushtaqZ.NazirA.JaffarM. T.AsgharH. N.AlzuaibrF. M.et al. (2023). Growth response of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L.) exposed to Pseudomonas fluorescens, Pseudomonas stutzeri, and Pseudomonas gessardii in lead contaminated soil. Plant Stress10:100259. 10.1016/j.stress.2023.100259
6
AL-HuqailA. A.AlatawiA.JavedS.TahirM. F.AnasM.SaleemM. H.et al. (2025). Individual and combinatorial applications of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria increase morpho-physio-biochemical responses in rice (Oryza sativa L.) under cadmium stress. J. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 25, 2673–2691. 10.1007/s42729-025-02291-5
7
AliM. M.HossainD.KhanM. S.BegumM.OsmanM. H. (2021). “Environmental pollution with heavy metals: a public health concern,” in Heavy Metals-Their Environmental Impacts and Mitigation, eds. M. K. Nazal and H. Zhao (London: IntechOpen).
8
AlipourE.AghapourA. A.Bahrami AslF. (2024). Concentration, spatial distribution, and non-carcinogenic risk assessment of arsenic, cadmium, chromium, and lead in drinking water in rural areas of eight cities of West Azarbaijan province, Iran. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res.31, 20222–20233. 10.1007/s11356-024-32433-8
9
AngonP. B.IslamM. S.DasA.AnjumN.PoudelA.SuchiS. A. (2024). Sources, effects and present perspectives of heavy metals contamination: soil, plants and human food chain. Heliyon10:e28357. 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e28357
10
AnjumS.SarwarM.MukhtarA.HussainT.LiaquatM.BatoolA.et al. (2025). Impact of rhizobacterial inoculation in plant growth medium to mitigate lead stress in Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.). Sci. Rep. 15:707. 10.1038/s41598-024-84648-x
11
AslamF.YasminA.SohailS. (2020). Bioaccumulation of lead, chromium, and nickel by bacteria from three different genera isolated from industrial effluent. Int. Microbiol.23, 253–261. 10.1007/s10123-019-00098-w
12
BhattaD.AdhikariA.KangS. M.KwonE. H.JanR.KimK. M.et al. (2023). Hormones and the antioxidant transduction pathway and gene expression, mediated by Serratia marcescens DB1, lessen the lethality of heavy metals (As, Ni, and Cr) in Oryza sativa L. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf.263:115377. 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2023.115377
13
BrunoL. B.KarthikC.MaY.KadirveluK.FreitasH.RajkumarM. (2020). Amelioration of chromium and heat stresses in Sorghum bicolor by Cr6+ reducing-thermotolerant plant growth promoting bacteria. Chemosphere244:125521. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.125521
14
ChenY.WuX.LinZ.TengD.ZhaoY.ChenS.et al. (2024). Screening of cadmium resistant bacteria and their growth promotion of Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench under cadmium stress. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf.272:116012. 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2024.116012
15
ChlebekD.PłociniczakT.GobettiS.KumorA.Hupert-KocurekK.Pacwa-PłociniczakM. (2021). Analysis of the genome of the heavy metal resistant and hydrocarbon-degrading rhizospheric Pseudomonas qingdaonensis ZCR6 strain and assessment of its plant-growth-promoting traits. Int. J. Mol. Sci.23:214. 10.3390/ijms23010214
16
ChuD. (2018). Effects of heavy metals on soil microbial community. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci.113:012009. 10.1088/1755-1315/113/1/012009
17
ChubukovaO. V.KhakimovaL. R.MatnyazovR. T.VershininaZ. R. (2024). Heavy metal-resistant PGPR strains of Pseudomonas sp. stimulating the growth of alfalfa under cadmium stress. Biol. Bull. Russ. Acad. Sci.51, 1291–1300. 10.1134/S1062359024607444
18
DeviR.BeheraB.RazaM. B.MangalV.AltafM. A.KumarR.et al. (2022). An insight into microbes mediated heavy metal detoxification in plants: a review. J. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr.22, 914–936. 10.1007/s42729-021-00702-x
19
DeyG.BanerjeeP.MaityJ. P.SharmaR. K.GnanachandrasamyG.HuangY. H.et al. (2022). Heavy metals distribution and ecological risk assessment including arsenic resistant PGPR in tidal mangrove ecosystem. Mar. Pollut. Bull.181:113905. 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2022.113905
20
EfeD. (2020). Potential plant growth-promoting bacteria with heavy metal resistance. Curr. Microbiol.77, 3861–3868. 10.1007/s00284-020-02208-8
21
El-BallatE. M.ElsilkS. E.AliH. M.AliH. E.HanoC.El-EsawiM. A. (2023). Metal-resistant PGPR strain Azospirillum brasilense EMCC1454 enhances growth and chromium stress tolerance of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) by modulating redox potential, osmolytes, antioxidants, and stress-related gene expression. Plants12:2110. 10.3390/plants12112110
22
El-EsawiM. A.AliH. M.HatamlehA. A.Al-DosaryM. A.El-BallatE. M. (2024). Multi-functional PGPR Serratia liquefaciens confers enhanced resistance to lead stress and bacterial blight in soybean (Glycine max L.). Curr. Plant Biol. 40:100403. 10.1016/j.cpb.2024.100403
23
El-MinisyA. M.BekheetS. A.El-AssalS. E. D.SolimanM.AmerA. M.HassanM.et al. (2025). Serratia rubidaea SR19: a cadmium-tolerant bacteria enhancing phosphate solubilization, IAA production, and promoting cucumber seed germination. Biocatal. Agric. Biotechnol.65:103546. 10.1016/j.bcab.2025.103546
24
FarooqA.KanwalR.BashirK.TianX.ChenY.LiuD.et al. (2025). Multi-omics analysis of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia S-11 reveals its potential for Pb2+ bioremediation in contaminated soil. J. Hazard. Mater.495:138867. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2025.138867
25
FirincáC.ZamfirL. G.ConstantinM.RáutI.JecuM. L.DoniM.et al. (2025). Innovative approaches and evolving strategies in heavy metal bioremediation: current limitations and future opportunities. J. Xenobiot.15:63. 10.3390/jox15030063
26
GhoshA.PramanikK.BhattacharyaS.MondalS.GhoshS. K.MaitiT. K. (2022). A potent cadmium bioaccumulating Enterobacter cloacae strain displays phytobeneficial property in Cd-exposed rice seedlings. Curr. Res. Microb. Sci.3:100101. 10.1016/j.crmicr.2021.100101
27
GhoshP. K.MaitiT. K.PramanikK.GhoshS. K.MitraS.DeT. K. (2018). The role of arsenic resistant Bacillus aryabhattai MCC3374 in promotion of rice seedlings growth and alleviation of arsenic phytotoxicity. Chemosphere211, 407–419. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.07.148
28
GulzarA. B. M.MazumderP. B. (2022). Helping plants to deal with heavy metal stress: the role of nanotechnology and plant growth promoting rhizobacteria in the process of phytoremediation. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res.29, 40319–40341. 10.1007/s11356-022-19756-0
29
GuptaR.KhanF.AlqahtaniF. M.HashemM.AhmadF. (2023). Plant growth–promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) assisted bioremediation of heavy metal toxicity. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 196, 2928–2956. 10.1007/s12010-023-04545-3
30
HamedM. T.ElwakilB. H.HagarM.GhareebD. A.OlamaZ. A. (2025). Chromium bioremediation mechanistic action assessment using bacterial consortium isolated from Egyptian Petroleum Refining Company. Sci. Afr.28:e02642. 10.1016/j.sciaf.2025.e02642
31
HarounM.XieS.AwadelkareemW.WangJ.QianX. (2023). Influence of biofertilizer on heavy metal bioremediation and enzyme activities in the soil to revealing the potential for sustainable soil restoration. Sci. Rep.13:20684. 10.1038/s41598-023-44986-8
32
HeX.XuM.WeiQ.TangM.GuanL.LouL.et al. (2020). Promotion of growth and phytoextraction of cadmium and lead in Solanum nigrum L. mediated by plant-growth-promoting rhizobacteria. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 205:111333. 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2020.111333
33
Herrera-CalderonA. C.LealL.Suárez-BautistaJ. D.Manotas-ViloriaH. S.Muñoz-GarcíaA.FrancoD.et al. (2024). Metagenomic and genomic analysis of heavy metal-tolerant and-resistant bacteria in resource islands in a semi-arid zone of the Colombian Caribbean. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res.31, 5596–5609. 10.1007/s11356-023-30253-w
34
IlyasN.AkhtarN.NaseemA.QureshiR.MajeedA.Al-AnsariM. M.et al. (2022). The potential of Bacillus subtilis and phosphorus in improving the growth of wheat under chromium stress. J. Appl. Microbiol.133, 3307–3321. 10.1111/jam.15676
35
JabborovaD.ChandraS.GothalwalR. (2025). Bioremediation of lead by indigenous bacteria isolated from an idol immersion site (lead remediation by Pseudomonas). World J. Environ. Biosc.14, 10–17. 10.51847/lbvwg7K7aB
36
JanR.KhanM. A.AsafS.Lubna LeeI. J.KimK. M. (2019). Metal resistant endophytic bacteria reduces cadmium, nickel toxicity, and enhances expression of metal stress related genes with improved growth of Oryza sativa, via regulating its antioxidant machinery and endogenous hormones. Plants8:363. 10.3390/plants8100363
37
JoshiH.MishraS. K.PrasadV.ChauhanP. S. (2023). Bacillus amyloliquefaciens modulate sugar metabolism to mitigate arsenic toxicity in Oryza sativa L. var Saryu-52. Chemosphere311:137070. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.137070
38
KaushalP.AliN.SainiS.PatiP. K.PatiA. M. (2023). Physiological and molecular insight of microbial biostimulants for sustainable agriculture. Front. Plant Sci.14:1041413. 10.3389/fpls.2023.1041413
39
KaushalP.PatiA. M. (2024). Bacillus altitudinis mediated lead bioremediation for enhanced growth of rice seedlings. Curr. Microbiol.81:410. 10.1007/s00284-024-03934-z
40
KhannaK.JamwalV. L.GandhiS. G.OhriP.BhardwajR. (2019). Metal resistant PGPR lowered Cd uptake and expression of metal transporter genes with improved growth and photosynthetic pigments in Lycopersicon esculentum under metal toxicity. Sci. Rep.9:5855. 10.1038/s41598-019-41899-3
41
KumarA.KumarA.MMSC,. P.ChaturvediA. K.ShabnamA. A.SubrahmanyamG.et al. (2020). Lead toxicity: health hazards, influence on food chain, and sustainable remediation approaches. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health17:2179. 10.3390/ijerph17072179
42
LiaoS.LingY.GaoY.MaG.LiX.ChenL.et al. (2025). Enhanced cadmium tolerance in perennial ryegrass via exogenous application of Enterobacter hormaechei strain X20. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf.292:117905. 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2025.117905
43
LiaquatF.MunisM. F. H.ArifS.HaroonU.ShengquanC.QunluL. (2020). Cd-tolerant SY-2 strain of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia: a potential PGPR, isolated from the Nanjing mining area in China. 3 Biotech10, 1–10. 10.1007/s13205-020-02524-7
44
LinX.MouR.CaoZ.XuP.WuX.ZhuZ.et al. (2016). Characterization of cadmium-resistant bacteria and their potential for reducing accumulation of cadmium in rice grains. Sci. Total Environ.569, 97–104. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.06.121
45
LiuA.WangW.ZhengX.ChenX.FuW.WangG.et al. (2022). Improvement of the Cd and Zn phytoremediation efficiency of rice (Oryza sativa) through the inoculation of a metal-resistant PGPR strain. Chemosphere302:134900. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.134900
46
LiuS.HuangY.ZhengQ.ZhanM.HuZ.JiH.et al. (2024). Cd-resistant plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria Bacillus siamensis R27 absorbed Cd and reduced Cd accumulation in lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.). Microorganisms12:2321. 10.3390/microorganisms12112321
47
LuziatelliF.FiccaA. G.CardarelliM.MeliniF.CavalieriA.RuzziM. (2020). Genome sequencing of Pantoea agglomerans C1 provides insights into molecular and genetic mechanisms of plant growth-promotion and tolerance to heavy metals. Microorganisms8:153. 10.3390/microorganisms8020153
48
LwinC. S.SeoB. H.KimH. U.OwensG.KimK. R. (2018). Application of soil amendments to contaminated soils for heavy metal immobilization and improved soil quality—A critical review. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 64, 156–167. 10.1080/00380768.2018.1440938
49
MadhogariaB.BanerjeeS.ChakrabortyS.DhakP.KunduA. (2024). Alleviation of heavy metals chromium, cadmium and lead and plant growth promotion in Vigna radiata L. plant using isolated Pseudomonas geniculata. Int. Microbiol.28, 133–149. 10.1007/s10123-024-00546-2
50
MajhiB.SemwalP.MishraS. K.MisraS.ChauhanP. S. (2023). Arsenic stress management through arsenite and arsenate-tolerant growth-promoting bacteria in rice. Int. Microbiol.28, 11–25. 10.1007/s10123-023-00447-w
51
MalikN.AhmadM.MalikZ.HussainA.WaseemM.AliA.et al. (2024). Isolation and characterization of chromium-resistant bacteria and their effects on germination, growth, and Cr accumulation in Capsicum annum (L.) under Cr stress. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 214:108955. 10.1016/j.plaphy.2024.108955
52
MarwaN.SinghN.SrivastavaS.SaxenaG.PandeyV.SinghN. (2019). Characterizing the hypertolerance potential of two indigenous bacterial strains (Bacillus flexus and Acinetobacter junii) and their efficacy in arsenic bioremediation. J. Appl. Microbiol.126, 1117–1127. 10.1111/jam.14179
53
MitraS.PramanikK.SarkarA.GhoshP. K.SorenT.MaitiT. K. (2018). Bioaccumulation of cadmium by Enterobacter sp. and enhancement of rice seedling growth under cadmium stress. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf.156, 183–196. 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2018.03.001
54
MohantyM.MohapatraS. (2023). Synergistic effect of PGPR and PSB for alleviation of chromium toxicity in Vigna radiata (L.) R. Wilczek seedlings. Int. J. Phytoremediation25, 1733–1742. 10.1080/15226514.2023.2189479
55
MushtaqZ.AkhterA.KhanH. A. A.AnwarW.HashemA.Avila-QuezadaG. D.et al. (2023). Impact assessment of lead-tolerant rhizobacteria to improve soil health using Indian mustard (Brassica juncea) as an indicator plant. Plants12:3005. 10.3390/plants12163005
56
NaqqashT.AzizA.BabarM.HussainS. B.HaiderG.ShahidM.et al. (2022). Lead-resistant Morganella morganii Rhizobacteria reduced lead toxicity in Arabidopsis thaliana by improving growth, physiology, and antioxidant activities. Agriculture12:1155. 10.3390/agriculture12081155
57
NazH.SayyedR. Z.KhanR. U.NazA.WaniO. A.MaqsoodA.et al. (2023). Mesorhizobium improves chickpea growth under chromium stress and alleviates chromium contamination of soil. J. Environ. Manage. 338:117779. 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.117779
58
NieW.WuY.JiangJ.WangZ.MuM.ZhaoS.et al. (2025). The isolation of lead-tolerant PGPR from red clover soil and its role in promoting the growth of alfalfa. Microorganisms13:210. 10.3390/microorganisms13010210
59
NyiramigishaP.KomariahSajidan (2021). Harmful impacts of heavy metal contamination in the soil and crops grown around dumpsites. Rev. Agric. Sci.9:271–282. 10.7831/ras.9.0_271
60
PalA. K.ChakrabortyA.SenguptaC. (2018). Differential effects of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria on chilli (Capsicum annuum L.) seedling under cadmium and lead stress. Plant Sci. Today5, 182–190. 10.14719/pst.2018.5.4.419
61
PandeyN.BhattR. (2016). Role of soil associated Exiguobacterium in reducing arsenic toxicity and promoting plant growth in Vigna radiata. Eur. J. Soil Biol.75, 142–150. 10.1016/j.ejsobi.2016.05.007
62
PandeyN.XalxoR.ChandraJ.KeshavkantS. (2023). Bacterial consortia mediated induction of systemic tolerance to arsenic toxicity via expression of stress responsive antioxidant genes in Oryza sativa L. Biocatal. Agric. Biotechnol.47:102565. 10.1016/j.bcab.2022.102565
63
RahbariA.FatemiH.Esmaiel PourB.RizwanM.SoltaniA. A. (2021). Lead (Pb)-resistant bacteria inhibit Pb accumulation in dill (Anethum graveolens L.) by improving biochemical, physiological, and antioxidant enzyme response of plants. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res.28:5704–5713. 10.1007/s11356-020-10851-8
64
RahmanZ.SinghV. P. (2019). The relative impact of toxic heavy metals (THMs) (arsenic (As), cadmium (Cd), chromium (Cr)(VI), mercury (Hg), and lead (Pb)) on the total environment: an overview. Environ. Monit. Assess.191, 1–21. 10.1007/s10661-019-7528-7
65
Raza AltafA.TengH.SaleemM.Raza AhmadH.AdilM.ShahzadK. (2021). Associative interplay of Pseudomonas gessardii BLP141 and pressmud ameliorated growth, physiology, yield, and Pb-toxicity in sunflower. Bioremed. J.25, 178–188. 10.1080/10889868.2020.1853028
66
RizviA.AhmedB.ZaidiA.KhanM. S. (2019). Heavy metal mediated phytotoxic impact on winter wheat: oxidative stress and microbial management of toxicity by Bacillus subtilis BM2. RSC Adv.9, 6125–6142. 10.1039/C9RA00333A
67
RoccoD.FreireB. M.OliveiraT. J.AlvesP. L. M.OliveiraJ. M.BatistaB. L.et al. (2023). Bacillus subtilis as an effective tool for bioremediation of lead, copper and cadmium in water. Discov. Appl. Sci.6:430. 10.21203/rs.3.rs-3610753/v1
68
RoyB.MaitraD.BhattacharyaA.MondalA.PalN.NandyA.et al. (2024). Alleviation of abiotic stress in Oryza sativa by the application of novel polyextremophilic plant growth promoting Bacillus. Biocatal. Agric. Biotechnol.60:103272. 10.1016/j.bcab.2024.103272
69
SahileA. A.KhanM. A.HamayunM.ImranM.KangS. M.LeeI. J. (2021). Novel Bacillus cereus strain, ALT1, enhance growth and strengthens the antioxidant system of soybean under cadmium stress. Agronomy11:404. 10.3390/agronomy11020404
70
SaleemM.AsgharH. N.ZahirZ. A.ShahidM. (2018). Impact of lead tolerant plant growth promoting rhizobacteria on growth, physiology, antioxidant activities, yield and lead content in sunflower in lead contaminated soil. Chemosphere195, 606–614. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.12.117
71
ShabaanM.AsgharH. N.AkhtarM. J.AliQ.EjazM. (2021). Role of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria in the alleviation of lead toxicity to Pisum sativum L. Int. J. Phytoremediation23, 837–845. 10.1080/15226514.2020.1859988
72
ShahT.MunsifF.D'amatoR.NieL. (2020). Lead toxicity induced phytotoxic impacts on rapeseed and clover can be lowered by biofilm forming lead tolerant bacteria. Chemosphere246:125766. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.125766
73
ShahidM.AltafM.AliS.TyagiA. (2024). Isolation and assessment of the beneficial effect of exopolysaccharide-producing PGPR in Triticum aestivum (L.) plants grown under NaCl and Cd-stressed conditions. Plant Physiol. Biochem.215:108973. 10.1016/j.plaphy.2024.108973
74
SharmaB.ShuklaP. (2021). Lead bioaccumulation mediated by Bacillus cereus BPS-9 from an industrial waste contaminated site encoding heavy metal resistant genes and their transporters. J. Hazard. Mater.401:123285. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.123285
75
SharmaS.TiwariS.HasanA.SaxenaV.PandeyL. M. (2018). Recent advances in conventional and contemporary methods for remediation of heavy metal-contaminated soils. 3 Biotech8, 1–18. 10.1007/s13205-018-1237-8
76
SilvaR. S.AntunesJ. E. L.AquinoJ. P. A. D.SousaR. S. D.MeloW. J. D.AraujoA. S. F. (2021). Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria effect on maize growth and microbial biomass in a chromium-contaminated soil. Bragantia80:e2521. 10.1590/1678-4499.20200492
77
SinghN.MarwaN.MishraJ.VermaP. C.RathaurS.SinghN. (2016). Brevundimonas diminuta mediated alleviation of arsenic toxicity and plant growth promotion in Oryza sativa L. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf.125, 25–34. 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2015.11.020
78
SrivastavaV.SarkarA.SinghS.SinghP.De AraujoA. S.SinghR. P. (2017). Agroecological responses of heavy metal pollution with special emphasis on soil health and plant performances. Front. Environ. Sci.5:64. 10.3389/fenvs.2017.00064
79
SyedA.ElgorbanA. M.BahkaliA. H.EswaramoorthyR.IqbalR. K.DanishS. (2023). Metal-tolerant and siderophore producing Pseudomonas fluorescence and Trichoderma spp. improved the growth, biochemical features and yield attributes of chickpea by lowering Cd uptake. Sci. Rep. 13:4471. 10.1038/s41598-023-31330-3
80
TatungM.DebC. R. (2024). Screening and characterization of heavy metal tolerant rhizobacteria from wild Musa rhizosphere from coal mining area of Changki, Nagaland, India and assessment of their growth promoting potential under Cd/Cu contaminated conditions. S. Afr. J. Bot. 165, 217–227. 10.1016/j.sajb.2023.12.039
81
TimothyN. A.WilliamsE. T. (2019). Environmental pollution by heavy metal: an overview. Int. J. Environ. Chem.3, 72–82. 10.11648/j.ijec.20190302.14
82
TirryN.JouteyN. T.SayelH.KouchouA.BahafidW.AsriM.et al. (2018). Screening of plant growth promoting traits in heavy metals resistant bacteria: prospects in phytoremediation. J. Genet. Eng. Biotechnol.16, 613–619. 10.1016/j.jgeb.2018.06.004
83
TirryN.KouchouA.El OmariB.FeriounM.El GhachtouliN. (2021). Improved chromium tolerance of Medicago sativa by plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR). J. Genet. Eng. Biotechnol.19, 1–14. 10.1186/s43141-021-00254-8
84
UbaidillahM.ThamrinN.CahyaniF,. I.FitriyahD. (2023). Bioremediation potential of rhizosphere bacterial consortium in lead (Pb) contaminated rice plants. Biodiversitas24:d240838. 10.13057/biodiv/d240838
85
UllahI.AnwarY.SiddiquiM. F.AlsulamiN.UllahR. (2024). Phytoremediation of Arsenic (As) in rice plants, mediated by Bacillus subtilis strain IU31 through antioxidant responses and phytohormones synthesis. Environ. Pollut.355:124207. 10.1016/j.envpol.2024.124207
86
VasilachiI. C.StoleruV.GavrilescuM. (2023). Analysis of heavy metal impacts on cereal crop growth and development in contaminated soils. Agriculture13:1983. 10.3390/agriculture13101983
87
VélezJ. M. B.MartínezJ. G.OspinaJ. T.AgudeloS. O. (2021). Bioremediation potential of Pseudomonas genus isolates from residual water, capable of tolerating lead through mechanisms of exopolysaccharide production and biosorption. Biotechnol. Rep.32:e00685. 10.1016/j.btre.2021.e00685
88
WangN.WangX.ChenL.LiuH.WuY.HuangM.et al. (2024). Biological roles of soil microbial consortium on promoting safe crop production in heavy metal (loid) contaminated soil: a systematic review. Sci. Total Environ.912:168994. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.168994
89
WaqasW.YuanY.AliS.ZhangM.ShafiqM.AliW.et al. (2024). Toxic effects of heavy metals on crustaceans and associated health risks in humans: a review. Environ. Chem. Lett.22, 391–1411. 10.1007/s10311-024-01717-3
90
XiaoA. W.LiZ.LiW. C.YeZ. H. (2020). The effect of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) on arsenic accumulation and the growth of rice plants (Oryza sativa L.). Chemosphere242:125136. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.125136
91
XuX.XuM.ZhaoQ.XiaY.ChenC.ShenZ. (2018). Complete genome sequence of Cd (II)-resistant Arthrobacter sp. PGP41, a plant growth-promoting bacterium with potential in microbe-assisted phytoremediation. Curr. Microbiol.75, 1231-1239. 10.1007/s00284-018-1515-z
92
ZainabN.Amna KhanA. A.AzeemM. A.AliB.WangT.ShiF.et al. (2021). PGPR-mediated plant growth attributes and metal extraction ability of Sesbania sesban L. in industrially contaminated soils. Agronomy11:1820. 10.3390/agronomy11091820
93
ZainabN.GlickB. R.BoseA.AliJ.ur RehmanF.PakerN. P.et al. (2024). Deciphering the mechanistic role of Bacillus paramycoides (PM51) and Bacillus tequilensis (PM52) in bio-sorption and phyto-assimilation of Cadmium via Linum usitatissimum L. seedlings. Plant. Physiol. Biochem.211:108652. 10.1016/j.plaphy.2024.108652
94
ZhangY.WuX.TaoY.KeT.WuW.LiaoK.et al. (2023). Effect of plant growth–promoting rhizobacteria on oilseed rape Brassica juncea and phytoextraction of cadmium. J. Soils Sediments23, 3472–3484. 10.1007/s11368-023-03559-y
Summary
Keywords
bioremediation, heavy metals, plant growth promoting rhizobacteria, sustainable agriculture, crop productivity
Citation
Kaushal P and Pati AM (2025) Unleashing rhizobacteria for sustainable soil remediation: PGPR roles in heavy metal tolerance, detoxification, and plant productivity. Front. Microbiol. 16:1662000. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2025.1662000
Received
08 July 2025
Accepted
21 August 2025
Published
09 September 2025
Volume
16 - 2025
Edited by
Duraipandiyan Veeramuthu, Loyola College, Chennai, India
Reviewed by
Amit Srivastava, The Czech Academy of Sciences, Czechia
Tharsius Raja William Raja, Bishop Heber College, India
Updates
Copyright
© 2025 Kaushal and Pati.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Aparna Maitra Pati aparnamaitrapati@gmail.com; aparna@ihbt.res.in
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.