ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Microbiol.
Sec. Microbial Symbioses
Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2025.1677214
This article is part of the Research TopicDynamics of the Human Skin MicrobiotaView all 5 articles
Early skin colonization by Staphylococcus epidermidis and Staphylococcus aureus reveals environment-dependent synergistic effects
Provisionally accepted- 1Other, Paris, France
- 2Laboratoires Clarins SAS, Pontoise, France
- 3Eurofins BIO-EC, Longjumeau, France
- 4CY Cergy Paris Universite Equipe de Recherche sur les Relations Matrice Extracellulaire-Cellule, Cergy-Pontoise, France
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Introduction: The skin microbiome is crucial for skin health and homeostasis. It contributes to immune defense, promotes epidermal differentiation, and supports a robust skin barrier function. Despite its importance, few studies have used model skin systems to examine how simple bacterial communities interact and how they impact the skin. Methods: We studied the interaction between a skin commensal, Staphylococcus epidermidis, and a pathogen, Staphylococcus aureus, by performing inoculations and co-inoculations on Reconstructed Human Epidermis (RHE) models maintained under classical humid conditions (>90% relative humidity) or dry conditions (<25% RH). In parallel, inoculations were conducted on human skin explants using a novel culture setup preserving physiological humidity levels (40-60% RH). Bacterial attachment was assessed four hours post-inoculation. At 24 hours, histology was examined, three natural moisturizing factors (NMFs) were quantified. Filaggrin (FLG) and ceramide levels were analyzed to assess the skin barrier function. Results: In contrast to previous findings at 24 hours, co-inoculation increased S. epidermidis and S. aureus attachment in RHEs, but only under humid conditions. Only RHE maintained in dry conditions and skin explant revealed an effect of co-inoculation on filaggrin (FLG), yet an increase in RHEs and a decrease in skin explants. In both RHEs maintained in dry conditions and skin explants, NMF levels were consistently reduced following co-inoculation. In RHEs and skin explants, inoculation with S. aureus alone also lowered NMFs, with co-inoculation further amplifying this effect. Finally, ceramide levels increased similarly across both inoculations and co-inoculation. Discussion: Revealing unexpected early interactions between S. epidermidis, S. aureus, and the skin, our results could suggest that co-inoculation may trigger a synergetic disruption of the barrier function. Alternatively, it could imply that co-inoculation might reinforce the epidermal barrier via a S. aureus-mediated stimulation of the protective functions of S. epidermidis. Further studies are needed to confirm these effects and determine whether they are strain-specific or more broadly applicable.
Keywords: Skin microbiome, Reconstructed human epidermis, Skin explant, Staphylococcus epidermidis, Staphylococcus aureus, Barrier function
Received: 31 Jul 2025; Accepted: 19 Sep 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Ngari, Poulet, Percoco, Peno-Mazzarino and Seyer. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Chrisse Ngari, chrisse.ngari@clarins.com
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.