Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Microbiol.

Sec. Terrestrial Microbiology

Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2025.1681490

This article is part of the Research TopicMicrobial-driven Carbon, Nitrogen and Phosphorus Cycling Mechanisms in Terrestrial EcosystemsView all articles

Effects of Bacterial Fertilizer and Green Manure on Soil Enzyme Activity and Root Characteristics in Korla Fragrant Pear Orchard

Provisionally accepted
Zhanyi  HeZhanyi HeJie  LiJie LiLele  YangLele YangLinsen  YanLinsen YanBolang  ChenBolang ChenXing  ShenXing Shen*Zhongping  ChaiZhongping Chai*
  • Xinjiang Agricultural University, Ürümqi, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

To systematically evaluate the effects of bacterial fertilizer and different types of green manure on the rhizosphere ecological functions and yield formation of Korla fragrant pear (Pyrus brestschneideri Rehd.), a field experiment was conducted in a Korla pear orchard. Six treatments were established: bacterial fertilizer (JF), two planting densities of sweet clover (CMX1, CMX2), two planting densities of oil sunflower (DK1, DK2), and a control (CK). Their impacts on soil physicochemical properties, enzyme activity, root structure, and yield were analyzed. The results showed that both bacterial fertilizer and green manure significantly reduced soil pH and EC and improved soil nutrient content and enzyme activity. Bacterial fertilizer was more effective in enhancing enzyme activity, whereas green manure, particularly sweet clover, was more effective in improving soil properties. Sweet clover reduced soil pH and EC and increased available nutrients, while oil sunflower was more effective in increasing soil organic matter. For both green manures, low density outperformed high density. Both bacterial fertilizer and green manure promoted Root activity, decreased cortex thickness, and increased vessel area, with bacterial fertilizer showing the greatest effect, followed by sweet clover and oil sunflower. High-density sweet clover and low-density oil sunflower achieved better outcomes within their treatments. Sweet clover and bacterial fertilizer also increased the proportion of cellulose cell wall cells in xylem and phloem, with sweet clover outperforming bacterial fertilizer. Yield was improved by both bacterial fertilizer and green manure, with bacterial fertilizer achieving the highest increase, though not significantly different from green manure. The PLS-SEM model indicated that bacterial fertilizer and green manure enhanced root structure and Root activity, ultimately improving yield by reducing soil pH and EC and increasing soil nutrients and enzyme activity. Root activity was identified as a key mediator. Based on goals of improving soil fertility, promoting root growth, increasing yield, and achieving cost-effectiveness and green production, CMX1 is recommended as the optimal management practice. These findings provide scientific support for sustainable pear production in arid regions and broaden perspectives on root ecological regulation.

Keywords: Korla fragrant pear, Green manure, Soil nutrients, enzyme activity, root activity, yield

Received: 07 Aug 2025; Accepted: 12 Sep 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 He, Li, Yang, Yan, Chen, Shen and Chai. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence:
Xing Shen, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Ürümqi, China
Zhongping Chai, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Ürümqi, China

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.