REVIEW article
Front. Microbiol.
Sec. Ancient DNA and Forensic Microbiology
Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2025.1684366
This article is part of the Research TopicMicrobial Signatures in Forensics: Bridging Science and JusticeView all articles
Advancing time-since-interval estimation for clandestine graves: From traditional approaches to forensic ecogenomics using massively parallel sequencing
Provisionally accepted- 1School of Pharmacy and Biomolecular Sciences, Forensic Research Institute, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, United Kingdom
- 2School of Biological and Environmental Sciences, Forensic Research Institute, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, United Kingdom
- 3School of Law and Justice Studies, Forensic Research Institute, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, United Kingdom
- 4General Engineering Research Institute, Forensic Research Institute, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, United Kingdom
- 5Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, United Kingdom
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Forensic taphonomy and entomology has focused on estimating the post-mortem interval (PMI), particularly for surface depositions, using human cadavers and other mammalian models by considering morphological changes of the body and insect activity during decomposition. The PMI is crucial in forensic investigations as it provides key information regarding the victim's identity, the circumstances of their death and can confirm or refute a suspect's alibi. Gravesoil microbial communities are a potential tool that can complement traditional approaches to detect and confirm the presence of human remains in clandestine burials, aiding forensic investigations. The estimation of the time-since-burial (post-burial interval; PBI), and the time-since-translocation (post-translocation interval; PTI), a new concept, have potential to aid clandestine grave location but have received relatively little attention in forensic ecology research. Advances in massively parallel sequencing (MPS) provide a high-throughput means to estimate PBI and PTI by characterising soil microbial communities in graves with remains, from early to skeletal stages of decomposition, or where remains have been intentionally removed from crime scenes and relocated. This review presents a perspective on the use of the soil microbiome as an indicator for post-mortem time-since-interval estimations, with specific focus on the PBI and PTI. In addition, it provides a framework, supported within forensic ecogenomics, on how the PBI and PTI can be used as a forensic tool complemented by MPS. The review highlights the need for further research to validate microbial community analysis across diverse biogeographical regions to enhance its precision and reliability as a forensic investigative tool. Such validation could potentially enhance the accuracy of post-burial and post-translocation interval estimations, ultimately improving methods for clandestine grave identification.
Keywords: Clandestine burials, soil microbiome, time-since-interval, Post-mortem interval, Post-burial interval, post-translocation interval, massively parallel sequencing, Forensic ecogenomics
Received: 12 Aug 2025; Accepted: 16 Oct 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 de Bruyn, Scott, Panter, Bezombes and Ralebitso-Senior. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: T. Komang Ralebitso-Senior, t.k.ralebitsosenior@ljmu.ac.uk
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.