Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Microbiol., 03 December 2025

Sec. Food Microbiology

Volume 16 - 2025 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2025.1685522

This article is part of the Research TopicAntimicrobial Resistance: Tracking and Tackling in the Food ChainView all 11 articles

Antimicrobial resistance of Escherichia coli from broilers in large-scale poultry farms in Shandong Province


Xiaoxia Liu,&#x;Xiaoxia Liu1,2†Xiang Li,&#x;Xiang Li1,3†Jing LiuJing Liu2Ruiying ChenRuiying Chen3Rui LiuRui Liu4Ruting ZhaoRuting Zhao2Jia ZhaoJia Zhao1Jianwei HaoJianwei Hao1Shuming YangShuming Yang2Aiguo Luo*Aiguo Luo1*Ailiang Chen*Ailiang Chen2*
  • 1Department of Biological Science and Technology, Shanxi Center of Technology Innovation for Compound Condiment, Jinzhong University, Jinzhong, China
  • 2Key Laboratory of Agro-Product Quality and Safety, Institute of Quality Standards and Testing Technology for Agro-Products, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China
  • 3School of Food Science and Engineering, Shanxi Agricultural University, Jinzhong, China
  • 4School of Investigation, People’s Public Security University of China, Beijing, China

Background: Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a global challenge affecting both healthcare and agricultural fields, as emphasized by the World Health Organization (WHO). Industrial poultry production plays a crucial role in the development and dissemination of AMR. A comprehensive understanding of the molecular mechanisms underlying AMR is imperative for developing effective control strategies.

Materials and methods: This study aimed to identify factors influencing AMR in Escherichia coli from large-scale commercial broiler farms. Samples, including 371 anal swabs, 95 fecal swabs, and 122 feed-trough swabs, were collected from Cobb broilers at the four production stages (1, 15, 26, and 38 days of age) on typical farms in Shandong Province. From these specimens, 508 E. coli strains were isolated and characterized. Antimicrobial susceptibility was assessed using the Kirby–Bauer disk diffusion method against 15 commonly used antibiotics, and results were interpreted according to CLSI guidelines.

Results: The resistance rates of the isolated strains varied between 24.41% and 95.47%. A total of 96.45% of the strains exhibited multidrug resistance, and 29 strains were resistant to all 15 antibiotics. The highest resistance was observed against penicillin (amoxicillin and ampicillin), followed by florfenicol, chloramphenicol, tetracycline, cefotaxime, and cefazolin. The lowest resistance was noted for ofloxacin and gentamicin. Drug resistance was most substantial at 15 days of age compared with that at 1, 26, and 38 days of age.

Discussion: An analysis of the relationship between drug resistance and drug use showed that doxycycline significantly increased the resistance rate (68.40%, p < 0.05). Additionally, the drug resistance of bacteria isolated from fecal swabs was higher than that of bacteria from anal and feed-trough swabs. The results indicate that sample type, drug type, and age all influence E. coli drug resistance in poultry, with drug type having the greatest impact.

1 Introduction

Globally, the World Health Organization has identified antimicrobial resistance (AMR) as a major hazard to public health (Ajibola et al., 2025; Nduku et al., 2025; Donkor et al., 2024). The rise and proliferation of AMR pose significant challenges to global health, affecting humans, animals, and the environment (Ssemakadde et al., 2025; Ahmed et al., 2024; Melo et al., 2018; Badger et al., 2018; Eibach et al., 2018). Various factors contribute to the rising occurrence of AMR genes (Senawin et al., 2025; Pan et al., 2024; Bassitta et al., 2022). One of the primary drivers is the unregulated administration of antibiotics in lower-middle-income nations, where these medications are extensively used in both human and veterinary healthcare with inadequate oversight (Sunil et al., 2019; Hailat et al., 2023; Jimah et al., 2020; Opoku et al., 2020). The intricate dynamics of AMR, comprising interactions between humans, animals, and the environment, significantly influence the development and dissemination of resistance determinants (Lalak et al., 2016; Silbergeld et al., 2008).

Poultry has become an increasingly vital global source of nutrition, widely consumed yet frequently linked to outbreaks of foodborne illnesses. Harmful microorganisms may be transmitted to humans via direct exposure to poultry waste or ingestion of contaminated poultry derived products (Ajibola et al., 2025; Havelaar et al., 2022; Okpara et al., 2018; Herrero et al., 2013). The avian gastrointestinal tract serves as a reservoir for Escherichia coli, facilitating its potential transmission from birds to humans (Awawdeh et al., 2024; Wang et al., 2019; Shobrak and Abo-Amer, 2014). E. coli is a gram-negative bacterium that generally exists as a commensal organism in the digestive systems of animals, humans, and birds. However, some strains act as key pathogens, causing both intestinal and extraintestinal infections (Santos et al., 2020).

Escherichia coli shows a high potential for developing AMR relative to many other prevalent bacterial species. Thus, both non-pathogenic and disease, causing E. coli strains carry a wide range of AMR genes, thereby elevating the possibility of transferring resistance traits to humans and other living organisms (Ahmed et al., 2024; Watt et al., 2025; Chuppava et al., 2018; Badger et al., 2018; von Wintersdorff et al., 2016).

This study focused on Cobb broiler chickens in Shandong Province, with samples collected at various ages, separated, and analyzed for the presence of E. coli. These E. coli strains were evaluated for their sensitivity to a panel of 15 distinct antibiotics. Additionally, this study investigated variations in antibiotic resistance among chicken breeds at various ages. A comprehensive analysis of E. coli resistance in a large-scale poultry farming will offer a scientific framework for applying antimicrobial agents, thereby contributing to the containment of bacterial resistance. Moreover, the findings may facilitate optimizing breeding practices in poultry farms to reduce the burden of bacterial infections. This study aimed to elucidate the determinants influencing AMR in E. coli isolated from large-scale commercial broiler farms. By reducing the propagation of AMR and ensuring the safety and quality of poultry products, this study lays the foundation for further investigation into the resistance mechanisms of E. coli.

2 Materials and methods

2.1 Introduction to typical chicken farms and sample collection

This study was carried out on a broiler poultry farm in Shandong, China, spanning 30 acres with eight chicken houses, each containing 30,000 chickens (total 250,000 chickens). The feeding regimen for Cobb broiler chickens was planned for three stages: 1–15 days, 16–24 days, and 25–42 days within a 42-days feeding cycle. An all-in, all-out feeding strategy was employed, allowing the chickens ad libitum access to food and water. The farm adhered to rigorous disinfection and sterilization protocols before and after chicken occupancy. Vaccination against infectious bronchitis and Newcastle disease was administered via drinking water on day seven of the broiler feeding cycle. The farm’s medication protocol included tilmicosin and colistin on day 2 (treatment duration of 3–4 days), tilmicosin and colistin again on days 8 and 9, oxytetracycline on days 13 and 14, and amoxicillin and neomycin on days 28 and 29, each for 3–4 days.

Sample size determination and collection followed the methodological framework proposed by Apenteng et al. (2023), which emphasizes balancing statistical confidence, detection sensitivity, representativeness, and practical constraints in AMR surveillance. Following this principle, a total of 694 samples were initially collected from a representative large-scale Cobb broiler farm in Gaomi, Shandong Province. During transport, 106 samples were excluded due to physical damage, swab leakage, or inadequate sealing, all of which could lead to potential cross-contamination. After stringent quality control screening, 588 qualified samples were retained for analysis (Table 1). These comprised anal swabs, fecal swabs, and feed-trough swabs collected from broilers at four growth stages (1, 15, 26, and 38 days of age).

TABLE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. Detailed sample collection (isolates) from a Cobb broiler farm in Shandong Province (strain) province.

2.2 Isolation and purification of bacteria

The collected samples were shaken in a sterile physiological saline tube, and 1 mL was promptly added to the enrichment solution to isolate the bacteria. The tube was placed in a shaking incubator at 37 °C ± 1 °C for 18–24 h. In a sterile environment, a disposable inoculating loop was used to streak the cultured bacterial solution onto the appropriate selective medium, as outlined by Liu et al. (2022). After the culture period, suspicious single colonies observed on the plates were selected, inoculated onto nutrient agar plates, and preserved for further inspection. The isolation and identification processes adhered to relevant standards.

2.3 Molecular identification of test strains

Bacterial DNA was extracted by alkaline lysis following Clarridge’s (2004) methodology. The primer sequences were 27F (AGAGTTTGATCMTGGCTCAG) and 1492R (GGTTACCTTGTTACGACTT). The PCR amplification system was prepared in 20 μL (total volume), consisting of 2× PCR Master Mix (10 μL), 10 μmol/L of each of forward (F) and reverse (R) primers (1 μL), DNA template (20 ng), and ddH2O to adjust to the final volume. The thermal cycling conditions were as follows: an initial denaturation step at 94 °C for 4 min, followed by 30 cycles of denaturation at 94 °C for 40 s, annealing at 56 °C for 30 s, and elongation at 72 °C for 1 min, with a final elongation at 72 °C for 5 min. The amplified PCR products were submitted to Sangon Bioengineering (Shanghai) Co., Ltd., for sequencing. Sequence analysis was carried out using BLAST1. The Mega 6.0 software was used to conduct a comparative examination and construct phylogenetic trees as per the sequence similarity.

2.4 Drug susceptibility test of bacteria in typical chicken farms

The Kirby–Bauer (K–B) disk diffusion assay evaluated bacterial susceptibility to 15 distinct antibiotics. The interpretation of results and quality control procedures were conducted in line with the guidelines of the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) manual for antimicrobial susceptibility testing. Bacterial isolates were classified into three categories: susceptible (S), intermediate (I), or resistant (R) (Liu et al., 2022). The inhibition zone diameters were measured using Vernier calipers to determine the level of bacterial resistance to the tested antibiotics.

2.5 Data management and statistical analysis

All data were structured and processed via Microsoft Excel (Office 2013) and IBM SPSS Statistics 23. A logistic regression model was applied to assess the prevalence of E. coli resistance against multiple antimicrobial agents in broiler farming environments. Additionally, the impact of three factors–age, type of medication, and sampling location on E. coli resistance to each antibiotic was assessed using logistic regression analysis. The assigned values are presented in Supplementary Information Table SI 1 and were screened as per the odds ratios (OR values), 95% confidence intervals, and p-values to identify factors influencing E. coli resistance. A p-value of less than 0.05 or 0.001 was considered statistically significant. Key determinants influencing E. coli AMR were examined by evaluating the OR for each contributing factor. Factors with OR values deviating from one were regarded as particularly significant. Following the established criteria for multidrug resistant (MDR), extensively drug-resistant (XDR), and pan drug-resistant bacteria (PDR), E. coli isolates were categorized as fully susceptible, single-resistant (1), multi-resistant (2–4), or highly resistant (>4) to antibiotics (Magiorakos et al., 2012).

3 Results

3.1 Distribution of AMR rates in E. coli isolates from Cobb broiler farm

A total of 588 samples were processed for bacterial isolation, purification, and identification to obtain a comprehensive understanding of AMR in commercial poultry farms. As a result, 508 E. coli strains were isolated. The highest resistance levels among the isolated strains were observed against penicillin-like antibiotics, specifically amoxicillin (95.47%) and ampicillin (95.08%), as presented in Table 2. Notably, only 0.39% of isolates were intermediate to amoxicillin. Additionally, the investigated strains exhibited a resistance rate of 85.43% to florfenicol, widely used in clinical veterinary medicine.

TABLE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Table 2. Distribution of overall drug resistance rate of Escherichia coli isolated from chicken in Cobb broiler farm.

3.2 Changes in drug-resistant bacteria during the broiler growth cycle

Sampling and analysis were conducted on Cobb broilers aged 1, 15, 26, and 38 days from large-scale commercial farms. Details of E. coli isolation are provided in Figure 1 and Supplementary Information Table SI 2. AMR was the lowest in isolates from 1-day-old chicks and peaked at 15 days of age. At this stage, isolates exhibited high resistance rates (approximately 90%) to multiple antibiotic classes, including penicillins (amoxicillin, ampicillin), chloramphenicol, florfenicol, macrolides (erythromycin), cephalosporins (cefotaxime, cefazolin), tetracyclines, and aminoglycosides (streptomycin). Notably, with the exception of ampicillin resistance in 1-day-old isolates (89.33%), resistance to penicillin antibiotics (amoxicillin and ampicillin) remained high across all sampling ages, consistently exceeding 90%.

FIGURE 1
Ternary plot displaying antibiotic resistance, sensitivity, and intermediate responses in samples at different ages. Shapes represent ages: squares (1 day), pentagons (15 days), diamonds (26 days), stars (38 days). Colors indicate various antibiotics, including Florfenicol, Chloramphenicol, Doxycycline, and others. Axes labeled as Sensitivity (S), Resistance (R), and Intermediate (I), each ranging from zero to one hundred.

Figure 1. Results of antibiotic resistance of Escherichia coli isolated from Cobb broilers of different ages.

In contrast, the sensitivity distribution of test strains isolated from Cobb broilers of varying ages to ofloxacin (a quinolone) revealed a clear trend, with an average resistance rate of 23.34%. Notably, the resistance rates of isolates on days 15 and 26 were higher than those observed on days 1 and 38, indicating a trend toward shifting drug resistance from sensitive to intermediate levels. Additionally, the resistance rates of strains isolated from different ages to chloramphenicol and tetracycline were comparable, with average resistance rates of 84.01% and 84.40%, respectively.

Resistance to florfenicol among isolates on days 15, 26, and 38 was notably high, exceeding 92%. In contrast, the resistance rate of isolates on day 1 was relatively low at 63.33%. Farm management records revealed that doxycycline was administered via drinking water on days 8 and 9, florfenicol on days 13 and 14, and amoxicillin and neomycin on days 28 and 29. Consequently, the resistance rates to doxycycline and florfenicol increased to 70.27% and 96.62%, respectively, by day 15, while the resistance rate to amoxicillin increased to 97.78% by day 38. These findings indicated that drug resistance was most pronounced on day 15, suggesting that the substantial use of antibiotics in the early stages contributed to increased resistance.

The influence of broiler age (1, 15, 26, and 38 days) on the AMR of E. coli was assessed using binary logistic regression, with isolates from 1-day-old chicks serving as the reference (Supplementary Information Table SI 3). The overall resistance was highest at 15 days of age, particularly to erythromycin (OR = 34.13, p < 0.001) and cefotaxime (p < 0.001). Resistance to chloramphenicol, erythromycin, and cefotaxime was consistently greater at 15, 26, and 38 days than at day 1 (p < 0.001). At 26 days, a notable increase in resistance to cefazolin (OR = 5.63, p < 0.001) was observed, accompanied by significant differences in susceptibility to trimethoprim, tetracycline, ciprofloxacin, and enrofloxacin (p < 0.05). By 38 days, resistance to amoxicillin, ampicillin, tetracycline, and cefazolin also remained significantly elevated (p < 0.05). Collectively, these findings indicate that E. coli resistance patterns fluctuate with age, with the highest overall resistance occurring at 15 days.

Escherichia coli isolated from Cobb broilers of different ages showed resistance to penicillin (amoxicillin and ampicillin), tetracyclines (tetracycline) and chloramphenicol-based fluorine compounds. Furthermore, the resistance rate analysis and binary logistic regression produced consistent results, suggesting a significant relationship between broiler age and E. coli resistance.

3.3 Relationship between drug-resistant bacteria and medication use

Sampling and analysis were conducted at various locations within the southern (No. 1) and northern (No. 5) areas of a large-scale Cobb broiler farm. The E. coli strains isolated from chicken samples are presented in Figure 2 and Supplementary Information Table SI 4. Overall, the antibiotic resistance of isolates from the southern region was slightly higher than that of the isolates from the northern region. However, resistance to erythromycin, tetracycline, doxycycline, ofloxacin, and streptomycin was slightly higher among isolates from the northern region than in those from the southern region. In the southern area, the resistance rates to amoxicillin and ampicillin were 97.92% and 92.27%, respectively, while those to florfenicol and chloramphenicol were 85.76% and 84.03%, respectively. These resistance rates were similar to those observed in the northern areas.

FIGURE 2
Ternary plot showing microbial resistance patterns with axes labeled Intermediate (I), Sensitivity (S), and Resistance (R). Different colored and shaped markers represent various antibiotics and regional data, including florfenicol, chloramphenicol, doxycycline, and others from northern and southern regions.

Figure 2. Effect of different ages on antibiotic susceptibility of Escherichia coli isolated from Cobb broilers.

The effect of various drug types on farms on the AMR of broiler derived E. coli was analyzed using binary logistic regression. The resistance profile of E. coli isolated from Cobb broilers in the southern area was used as a reference. The results of this analysis are presented in Supplementary Information Table SI 5. Compared with the southern region, E. coli isolates from the northern region showed significantly different resistance patterns to trimethoprim and erythromycin (p < 0.001), with ORs of 0.381 and 3.707, respectively. This indicated that the resistance of E. coli to trimethoprim and erythromycin in the northern region was particularly pronounced. However, substantial variations in resistance were identified for amoxicillin, ampicillin, and doxycycline (p < 0.05), with corresponding OR values of 0.254, 0.225, and 1.531, respectively. These findings indicate that E. coli isolates from the southern region showed remarkable resistance to amoxicillin and ampicillin. Moreover, the observed resistance to these β-lactam antibiotics and doxycycline was substantial and corresponded with the documented antimicrobial administration practices during farm visits.

3.4 Relationship between sampling type and drug-resistant bacteria

Sampling and analyses were conducted on various sample types (anal swabs, fecal swabs, and feed-trough swabs) of a large-scale Cobb broiler farm in Shandong. The antimicrobial susceptibility findings for the isolated E. coli strains are detailed in Supplementary Information Table SI 6 and illustrated in Figure 3. Statistical analysis indicated that the resistance of the test strains isolated from fecal swabs to antibiotics was greater than that observed in isolates from anal and feed-trough swabs. Notably, the resistance rates of isolates from fecal swabs to ampicillin, amoxicillin, florfenicol, chloramphenicol, and tetracycline exceeded 91%, suggesting a relatively high resistance level in fecal swabs.

FIGURE 3
Ternary plot showing antibiotic effectiveness with coordinates labeled Intermediate (I), Sensitivity (S), and Resistance (R) from zero to one hundred. Colored symbols represent different antibiotics, including Florfenicol and Tetracycline, and sample types (anal, feed trough, fecal).

Figure 3. Effect of different ages on antibiotic resistance in Escherichia coli isolated from Cobb broilers.

Binary logistic regression was employed to assess the effect of different samples (anal, fecal, and trough swabs) on the AMR of E. coli. For this analysis, E. coli isolates obtained from anal swabs in Cobb broiler farms were used as the reference group. The findings are summarized in Supplementary Information Table SI 7. As shown in the table, resistance patterns in E. coli isolates from trough swabs differed substantially from those in anal swabs for all tested antibiotics except for erythromycin, gentamicin, and doxycycline (p < 0.05). Furthermore, the resistance of the tested bacteria to cefotaxime, ciprofloxacin, and streptomycin was significantly different (p < 0.001). Compared with those from anal swabs, E. coli isolated from fecal swabs of chickens demonstrated marked differences in resistance to erythromycin, doxycycline, tetracycline, and florfenicol, with ORs of 2.057, 2.222, 3.717, and 3.126, respectively.

3.5 Distribution of multidrug-resistant chicken-derived E. coli isolates in broiler farms

Antibiotic resistance profiles of 588 E. coli isolates obtained from Cobb broiler farms were analyzed, and the distribution of resistant isolates is summarized in Figure 4 and Table 3. The number of resistant E. coli isolates varied substantially, with the largest proportion (18.50%) showing resistance to 13 antibiotics. Resistance to fewer than three antibiotics was rare (3.55%), whereas 2.36% and 2.17% of the isolates were resistant to four and six antibiotics, respectively. A high level of resistance was predominantly observed among isolates resistant to 11–13 antibiotics, and 29 isolates exhibited resistance to all tested antibiotics. These findings highlight the widespread occurrence and the alarming extent of antibiotic resistance among E. coli isolates throughout the broiler growth cycle.

FIGURE 4
Bar chart showing the proportion of E. coli isolates resistant to different numbers of antibiotics. Resistance peaks around 13 to 15 antibiotics, with the highest proportion at 15, over 15%.

Figure 4. The number of strains resistant to different antibiotics.

TABLE 3
www.frontiersin.org

Table 3. Distribution of Escherichia coli strains resistant to different antibiotics in Cobb broiler farms.

3.5.1 Distribution of resistant E. coli isolates from Cobb broiler farms at different ages

Statistical analysis of the number of resistant E. coli isolates from Cobb broiler farms across different sampling days is presented in Figure 5 and Supplementary Information Table SI 8. At 1 day of age, the range of resistant E. coli strains was 1–15 antibiotics, predominantly demonstrating resistance to 11–12 antibiotics. By 15 days of age, the range increased to 6–15 antibiotics, with resistance mainly observed in 13–14 antibiotics. At 26 days of age, the range was 2–15 antibiotics (excluding six classes), with resistance primarily concentrated in 12–13 antibiotics.

FIGURE 5
Bar graph showing the proportion of E. coli isolates resistant to different antibiotics over time. The x-axis represents the number of strains resistant to antibiotics, ranging from 0 to 15. The y-axis shows the proportion in percentage, from 0 to 30. The graph displays data for four different days: 1, 15, 26, and 38, each represented by different patterns. The highest resistance appears on day 15 with most isolates showing resistance to 11 to 13 antibiotics.

Figure 5. Distribution of E. coli strains resistant to different antibiotics at different ages.

Additionally, isolates from day-old chicks exhibited resistance to 2–15 antibiotics (excluding five classes), again concentrated in 12–13 antibiotic classes. At the fourth growth stage, the number of resistant E. coli isolates was primarily associated with 12–13 antibiotic classes. Considering the entire growth cycle of broiler chickens, the extent of resistance among E. coli isolates was most pronounced at 15 days of age.

3.5.2 Distribution of resistant E. coli isolates from Cobb broiler farms under different medication types

Statistical analyses of the number of resistant E. coli isolates and the corresponding antibiotics by medication type are presented in Figure 6 and Supplementary Information Table SI 9. In the southern region, the resistant E. coli strains were mainly distributed across 12–13 antibiotics, whereas in the northern region, they were concentrated in 13–14 antibiotics.

FIGURE 6
Bar graph comparing the proportion of E. coli isolates resistant to different numbers of antibiotics in Southern (288 samples) and Northern regions (220 samples). The horizontal axis shows the number of strains resistant, ranging from 0 to 15. The vertical axis represents the proportion of isolates as a percentage. The Southern region shows a higher proportion of resistance across most categories, with peaks around 11 to 13 resistant strains.

Figure 6. Distribution of antibiotic resistant E. coli isolates from Southern and Northern regions of Cobb broilers.

3.5.3 Distribution of resistant E. coli isolates from Cobb broilers by sample type

Statistical analyses of the number of resistant E. coli isolates and the corresponding antibiotics by sample type (anal swabs, feed-trough swabs, and fecal swabs) are presented in Figure 7 and Supplementary Information Table SI 10. Resistant E. coli strains isolated from anal swabs were predominantly resistant to 12–13 antibiotics, whereas those from feed-trough swabs exhibited resistance to 13–14 antibiotics. Fecal swab isolates were resistant to 13 antibiotics. Notably, the occurrence of extensively drug-resistant E. coli originating from chickens was particularly high in anal swab samples.

FIGURE 7
Bar chart showing the proportion of E. coli isolates resistant to different antibiotics from three sources: anal, feed trough, and fecal. The x-axis represents the number of strains resistant to antibiotics, ranging from zero to fifteen. The y-axis represents the percentage of E. coli isolates. Resistance peaks between strains ten to fourteen, with anal sources showing the highest resistance levels.

Figure 7. Distribution of antibiotic resistant E. coli isolates from different parts of Cobb broilers.

4 Discussion

Antimicrobial agents are essential in controlling various infections (Islam et al., 2024; Arbab et al., 2022). They target diverse pathogens, such as bacteria (antibiotics), fungi (antifungals), viruses (antivirals), and parasites (including antimalarials). However, the increasing drug resistance of E. coli in livestock and poultry production has complicated the understanding of underlying resistance mechanisms. This complexity, combined with the increasing dosages required to treat animal diseases, has resulted in suboptimal treatment outcomes and significant challenges in both prevention and control. Consequently, drug resistance poses major difficulties for the management of bacterial diseases.

Our study documents a pervasive AMR burden among broiler derived E. coli on a large-scale poultry farm. Resistance was highest for β-lactams, chloramphenicol, tetracycline, and early/third-generation cephalosporins, whereas ofloxacin and gentamicin showed comparatively lower resistance. Multidrug resistance (MDR) was widespread among isolates. These patterns are consistent with intensive poultry production and align with farm-level treatment practices reported during the production cycle (Table 2). To contextualize these findings, we compare our data with prior research and farm-level medication records.

At our site, 508 E. coli isolates were recovered from typical broiler farms in Shandong Province. Consistent with Table 2, the highest resistance levels were observed for penicillin derivatives, specifically amoxicillin (95.47%) and ampicillin (95.08%). Resistance exceeded 80% for florfenicol (85.43%), chloramphenicol, tetracycline (84.06%), cefotaxime (80.12%), and cefazolin (85.43%). Although ofloxacin (24.41%) and gentamicin (36.81%) showed the lowest resistance rates, both remained above 20%. Additionally, resistance rates above 50% were observed for sulfamethoxazole, erythromycin, streptomycin, doxycycline, ciprofloxacin, and enrofloxacin. Notably, 96.45% of the strains displayed MDR. The findings of this study align with those of previous research (de Jong et al., 2009; Lee, 2009). Nationally, cefotaxime resistance in poultry and swine E. coli increased from 25.60% (2008) to 46.91% (2012) and then declined to 35.08% (Zhang et al., 2015). Compared with the resistance levels reported in the US and the European Union, the prevalence of resistance to third-generation cephalosporins in Chinese poultry and swine farms remains substantially higher. A study by Tadesse et al. (2012) indicated that E. coli isolates derived from both human and animal sources showed a cefotaxime resistance rate of <22%, suggesting a lower prevalence of resistance in their findings relative to the current study.

Variation in AMR patterns among chicken breeds and age groups underscores the complex dynamics of AMR in poultry production. Although this study focused specifically on Cobb broilers, other strains (e.g., Ross and Hubbard) may display different resistance profiles owing to genetic differences, management practices, and immune capacity (Chuppava et al., 2018; Awawdeh et al., 2024). Our results indicated that isolates from 15-days-old broilers exhibited the highest levels of resistance, suggesting a close association between frequent antimicrobial use during the early life stage and a marked increase in E. coli resistance. During the chick stage, the immune system is immature, and birds are highly susceptible to environmental microbes. Under the high stocking densities typical of intensive production, producers often rely on antimicrobials to prevent disease, reduce losses, and maximize economic returns. Consistent with our findings, Zhang et al. (2017) reported a pronounced increase in resistance during early growth, particularly at the outset of intensive rearing, attributable to frequent antimicrobial use and immune immaturity. Zhou et al. (2024) similarly observed that E. coli isolated from white-feathered broilers maintained persistently high resistance to most antibiotics throughout the rearing cycle, with tetracycline resistance showing only minor fluctuations after 21 days of age and no significant decline.

Fenollar-Penadés et al. (2024) reported that, during the laying-hen rearing period, the prevalence of MDR in E. coli and resistance levels to some individual antimicrobials tended to decrease with increasing bird age; however, resistance remained widespread overall. Major resistance determinants (e.g., blaTEM, blaSHV, qnrB) were detected consistently across all stages, indicating persistence and co-occurrence of resistance genes. Moreover, Brower et al. (2017) characterized the antibiotic resistance landscape of E. coli within poultry production systems in Punjab, India, finding substantially higher resistance in broilers than in layers. This disparity was closely associated with intensive antimicrobial use and the short production cycles typical of broiler systems. The study further demonstrated that breed specific resistance patterns reflect differences in antimicrobial management practices and underscored the need for stricter antibiotic stewardship in broiler production. These breed and age associated differences underscore the necessity for tailored antimicrobial management strategies: changes in AMR patterns should be interpreted with regard to production type, growth stage, and genetic background.

The administration of antimicrobial agents is closely related to the emergence of bacterial resistance. A study by Zhang et al. (2017) examined the patterns of E. coli antibiotic resistance across seven provinces in China, including Sichuan, Shanghai, Shandong, Guangdong, Liaoning, Henan, and Inner Mongolia, from 2008 to 2015. The study found that 7,568 E. coli strains were isolated from chicken feces, with an MDR rate of 89.20% (6,571 out of 7,568). Notably, the high resistance rates (exceeding 86%) of chicken-derived E. coli to ampicillin, tetracycline, and sulfonamide suggest the prevalence of resistance to these three antibiotics on chicken farms. This phenomenon may be attributed to the frequent use of antibiotic classes (tetracyclines, sulfonamides, and penicillin) in agriculture. Antibiotics such as colistin, doxycycline, florfenicol, amoxicillin, and neomycin were used in their study. Their results indicated a significant increase in the resistance rate following antibiotic use. Speksnijder et al. (2015) reached a similar conclusion. Meanwhile, Lee (2009) reported that young poultry exhibited elevated resistance to ampicillin and tetracycline, a pattern that may be closely associated with the prophylactic use of antimicrobials during critical developmental stages.

Chloramphenicol has historically been used in multiple sectors but has been restricted in food animals in many regions due to safety concern (Sathya et al., 2020; Wang et al., 2021). To strengthen the regulation of veterinary drug residues, the Ministry of Agriculture of the People’s Republic of China (MOA) issued Circular No. 235 in December 2002, titled “Maximum Residue Limits of Veterinary Drugs in Animal Foods,” which explicitly banned chloramphenicol in animal-derived food products. Similarly, due to concerns over bacterial resistance and the toxic effects of chloramphenicol, several countries and areas i.e., Canada, the US, the European Union, Japan, Australia, and Brazil have established regulatory measures to restrict its use (Barreto et al., 2016). Despite its prohibition in veterinary medicine, the present study observed a resistance level of 83.07%, which closely aligns with the resistance to florfenicol, a structurally related antimicrobial agent. These findings indicate the potential for resistance transmission among bacterial species.

5 Strengths and limitations

Strengths include stage-stratified sampling at four production ages and across three sample types (anal swabs, fecal swabs, and feed-trough swabs), the relatively large number of isolates (n = 508), and the use of standardized CLSI-interpreted K–B disk diffusion testing across 15 agents, combined with farm-level treatment records. Limitations include the single-farm scope, which may limit the generalizability of the findings; the absence of genotypic characterization (e.g., extended-spectrum beta-lactamases, plasmid-mediated quinolone resistance genes, and aminoglycoside-modifying enzymes) to identify the underlying resistance mechanisms; and potential within-house clustering or unmeasured management confounders. The observational design precludes causal inference, and phenotypic resistance patterns may not fully capture transmission dynamics.

Future studies should broaden the sampling scope across multiple farms and integrate molecular or whole-genome analyses to determine the genetic relationships among animal, environmental, and human isolates. Such approaches would enhance understanding of antimicrobial transmission pathways and support targeted interventions aimed at mitigating resistance dissemination.

6 Conclusion

This study demonstrated that E. coli isolates from broiler farms in Shandong exhibited widespread MDR, particularly against penicillin and chloramphenicol. Resistance profiles varied across the growth cycle, with mid-growth broilers showing the highest resistance levels. The use of doxycycline was associated with elevated resistance, highlighting the selective pressure exerted by antimicrobial exposure. Moreover, fecal isolates showed higher resistance than those from anal or feed-trough samples, indicating that sampling type can influence observed AMR patterns. Collectively, these findings suggest that broiler growth stage, sampling type, and medication practices are key determinants shaping the resistance dynamics of broiler derived E. coli. Strengthening prudent antimicrobial use and maintaining continuous surveillance throughout the growth cycle are essential for mitigating the spread of resistance within intensive poultry production systems.

Data availability statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in this article/Supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.

Ethics statement

The manuscript presents research on animals that do not require ethical approval for their study.

Author contributions

XxL: Formal analysis, Writing – original draft, Project administration, Methodology, Data curation, Conceptualization, Software, Investigation, Funding acquisition. XL: Formal analysis, Writing – original draft, Data curation, Methodology, Validation. JL: Writing – review & editing, Methodology, Validation. RC: Writing – review & editing, Resources. RL: Writing – review & editing, Project administration. RZ: Formal analysis, Writing – review & editing. JZ: Methodology, Writing – review & editing. JH: Writing – review & editing, Visualization. SY: Writing – review & editing, Resources, Funding acquisition. AL: Supervision, Writing – review & editing. AC: Supervision, Writing – review & editing.

Funding

The author(s) declare financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article. Financial support was provided by Special Ph.D. Funding Project of Jinzhong University (JUD2023021).

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Shuming Yang and Ailiang Chen for instructing this study.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Generative AI statement

The authors declare that no Generative AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.

Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2025.1685522/full#supplementary-material

Footnotes

References

Ahmed, S. K., Hussein, S., Qurbani, K., Ibrahim, R. H., Fareeq, A., Mahmood, K. A., et al. (2024). Antimicrobial resistance: Impacts, challenges, and future prospects. J. Med. Surg. Public Health 2:100081. doi: 10.1016/j.glmedi.2024.100081

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Ajibola, A. T., de Lagarde, M., Ojo, O. E., Balogun, S. A., Vanier, G., Fairbrother, J. M., et al. (2025). Antimicrobial resistance and virulence gene profiles of Escherichia coli isolated from poultry farms using One Health perspective in Abeokuta, Nigeria. BMC Microbiol. 25:440. doi: 10.1186/s12866-025-04135-9

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Apenteng, O. O., Aarestrup, F. M., and Vigre, H. (2023). Modelling the effectiveness of surveillance based on metagenomics in detecting, monitoring, and forecasting antimicrobial resistance in livestock production under economic constraints. Sci. Rep. 13:20410. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-47754-w

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Arbab, S., Ullah, H., Wang, W., and Zhang, J. (2022). Antimicrobial drug resistance against Escherichia coli and its harmful effect on animal health. Vet. Med. Sci. 8, 1780–1786. doi: 10.1002/vms3.884

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Awawdeh, L., Forrest, R., Turni, C., Cobbold, R., Henning, J., and Gibson, J. (2024). Virulence-associated genes in faecal and clinical Escherichia coli isolates cultured from broiler chickens in Australia. Aus. Vet. J. 102, 398–406. doi: 10.1111/avj.13339

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Badger, S., Abraham, S., Saputra, S., Trott, D. J., Turnidge, J., Mitchell, T., et al. (2018). Relative performance of antimicrobial susceptibility assays on clinical Escherichia coli isolates from animals. Vet. Microbiol. 214, 56–64. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2017.12.008

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Barreto, F., Ribeiro, C., Barcellos Hoff, R., and Dalla Costa, T. (2016). Determination of chloramphenicol, thiamphenicol, florfenicol and florfenicol amine in poultry, swine, bovine and fish by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. J. Chromatogr. A 1449, 48–53. doi: 10.1016/j.chroma.2016.04.024

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Bassitta, R., Nottensteiner, A., Bauer, J., Straubinger, R. K., and Hölzel, C. S. (2022). Spread of antimicrobial resistance genes via pig manure from organic and conventional farms in the presence or absence of antibiotic use. J. Appl. Microbiol. 133, 2457–2465. doi: 10.1111/jam.15727

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Brower, C. H., Mandal, S., Hayer, S., Sran, M., Zehra, A., Patel, S. J., et al. (2017). The prevalence of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing multidrug-resistant Escherichia Coli in poultry chickens and variation according to farming practices in Punjab. India. Environ. Health Perspect. 125:077015. doi: 10.1289/EHP292

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Chuppava, B., Keller, B., Meißner, J., Kietzmann, M., and Visscher, C. (2018). Effects of different types of flooring design on the development of antimicrobial resistance in commensal Escherichia coli in fattening turkeys. Vet. Microbiol. 217, 18–24. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2018.02.018

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Clarridge, J. E. (2004). Impact of 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis for identification of bacteria on clinical microbiology and infectious diseases. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 17, 840–862. doi: 10.1128/CMR.17.4.840-862.2004

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

de Jong, A., Bywater, R., Butty, P., Deroover, E., Godinho, K., Klein, U., et al. (2009). A pan-European survey of antimicrobial susceptibility towards human-use antimicrobial drugs among zoonotic and commensal enteric bacteria isolated from healthy food-producing animals. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 63, 733–744. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkp012

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Donkor, E. S., Odoom, A., Osman, A. H., Darkwah, S., and Kotey, F. C. N. A. (2024). Systematic review on antimicrobial resistance in ghana from a one health perspective. Antibiotics 13:662. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics13070662

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Eibach, D., Dekker, D., Gyau Boahen, K., Wiafe Akenten, C., Sarpong, N., Belmar Campos, C., et al. (2018). Extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae in local and imported poultry meat in Ghana. Vet. Microbiol. 217, 7–12. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2018.02.023

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Fenollar-Penadés, A., Catalá-Gregori, P., Tallá-Ferrer, V., Castillo, M. Á,García-Ferrús, M., and Jiménez-Belenguer, A. (2024). Evolution of the antibiotic resistance levels, multi-resistance patterns, and presence of antibiotic resistance genes in E. coli isolates from the feces of breeding hens during the rearing period. Antibiotics 13:753. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics13080753

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Hailat, E., Amiri, M., Debnath, N., Rahman, M., Nurul Islam, M., Fatima, Z., et al. (2023). Strengthening the one health approach in the eastern mediterranean region. Interact. J. Med. Res. 12:e41190. doi: 10.2196/41190

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Havelaar, A. H., Sapp, A. C., Amaya, M. P., Nane, G. F., Morgan, K. M., Devleesschauwer, B., et al. (2022). Burden of foodborne disease due to bacterial hazards associated with beef, dairy, poultry meat, and vegetables in Ethiopia and Burkina Faso, 2017. Front. Sustainable Food Syst. 6:1024560. doi: 10.3389/fsufs.2022.1024560

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Herrero, M., Grace, D., Njuki, J., Johnson, N., Enahoro, D., Silvestri, S., et al. (2013). The roles of livestock in developing countries. Animal 7 (Suppl. 1), 3–18. doi: 10.1017/S1751731112001954

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Islam, M. A., Bose, P., Rahman, M. Z., Muktaruzzaman, M., Sultana, P., Ahamed, T., et al. (2024). A review of antimicrobial usage practice in livestock and poultry production and its consequences on human and animal health. J. Adv. Vet. Animal Res. 11, 675–685. doi: 10.5455/javar.2024.k783

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Jimah, T., Fenny, A. P., and Ogunseitan, O. A. (2020). Antibiotics stewardship in Ghana: A cross-sectional study of public knowledge, attitudes, and practices among communities. One Health Outlook 2:10. doi: 10.1186/s42522-020-00021-8

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Lalak, A., Wasyl, D., Zając, M., Skarżyńska, M., Hoszowski, A., Samcik, I., et al. (2016). Mechanisms of cephalosporin resistance in indicator Escherichia coli isolated from food animals. Vet. Microbiol. 194, 69–73. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2016.01.023

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Lee, J. H. (2009). Antimicrobial resistance of Escherichia coli O26 and O111 isolates from cattle and their characteristics. Vet. Microbiol. 135, 401–405. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2008.09.076

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Liu, X., Liu, Q., Cheng, Y., Liu, R., Zhao, R., Wang, J., et al. (2022). Effect of bacterial resistance of Escherichia coli from swine in large-scale pig farms in Beijing. Front. Microbiol. 13:820833. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.820833

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Magiorakos, A. P., Srinivasan, A., Carey, R. B., Carmeli, Y., Falagas, M. E., Giske, C. G., et al. (2012). Multidrug-resistant, extensively drug-resistant and pandrug-resistant bacteria: An international expert proposal for interim standard definitions for acquired resistance. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 18, 268–281. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2011.03570.x

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Melo, L. C., Oresco, C., Leigue, L., Netto, H. M., Melville, P. A., Benites, N. R., et al. (2018). Prevalence and molecular features of ESBL/pAmpC-producing Enterobacteriaceae in healthy and diseased companion animals in Brazil. Vet. Microbiol. 221, 59–66. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2018.05.017

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Nduku, X., Stempa, T., Lungu, N. S., Ndobeni, T. N., and Mlambo, V. (2025). Prospects for antibiotic-free poultry production in South Africa: An analysis of the enablers and stumbling blocks. One Health 21:101144. doi: 10.1016/j.onehlt.2025.101144

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Okpara, E. O., Ojo, O. E., Awoyomi, O. J., Dipeolu, M. A., Oyekunle, M. A., and Schwarz, S. (2018). Antimicrobial usage and presence of extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae in animal-rearing households of selected rural and peri-urban communities. Vet. Microbiol. 218, 31–39. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2018.03.013

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Opoku, M. M., Bonful, H. A., and Koram, K. A. (2020). Antibiotic prescription for febrile outpatients: A health facility-based secondary data analysis for the Greater Accra region of Ghana. BMC Health Serv. Res. 20:978. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05771-9

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Pan, Y., Zeng, J., Zhang, L., Hu, J., Hao, H., Zeng, Z., et al. (2024). The fate of antibiotics and antibiotic resistance genes in large-scale chicken farm environments: Preliminary view of the performance of national veterinary antimicrobial use reduction action in guangdong. China. Environ. Int. 191:108974. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2024.108974

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Santos, V. B., Karine, M., and Gallina, C. M. (2020). Escherichia coli as a multifaceted pathogenic and versatile bacterium. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 10:548492. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2020.548492

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Sathya, A., Prabhu, T., and Ramalingam, S. (2020). Structural, biological and pharmaceutical importance of antibiotic agent chloramphenicol. Heliyon 6:e03433. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e03433

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Senawin, S., Bunchasak, C., Rakangthong, C., Kaewtapee, C., Foongladda, S., Surachat, K., et al. (2025). Microbiota profiles and antimicrobial resistance genes in sow fecal samples from farms with and without antibiotic use. Anim. Biosci. 38, 2487–2498. doi: 10.5713/ab.25.0062

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Shobrak, M. Y., and Abo-Amer, A. E. (2014). Role of wild birds as carriers of multi-drug resistant Escherichia coli and Escherichia vulneris. Braz. J. Microbiol. 45, 1199–1209. doi: 10.1590/s1517-83822014000400010

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Silbergeld, E. K., Graham, J., and Price, L. B. (2008). Industrial food animal production, antimicrobial resistance, and human health. Annu. Rev. Public Health 29, 151–169. doi: 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.29.020907.090904

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Speksnijder, D. C., Mevius, D. J., Bruschke, C. J., and Wagenaar, J. A. (2015). Reduction of veterinary antimicrobial use in the Netherlands. The Dutch success model. Zoonoses Public Health 62, (Suppl. 1), 79–87. doi: 10.1111/zph.12167

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Ssemakadde, T., Pauline Petra, N., Busingye, J. C., Bazira, J., and Taseera, K. (2025). Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance of Salmonella and pathogenic E. coli in broiler farms, Wakiso district, Uganda. PLoS One 20:e0309599. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0309599

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Sunil, P., Shristi, R., and Bipin, A. (2019). Tackling antimicrobial resistance in low-income and middle-income countries. BMJ Global Health 4:e002104. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2019-002104

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Tadesse, D. A., Zhao, S., Tong, E., Ayers, S., Singh, A., Bartholomew, M. J., et al. (2012). Antimicrobial drug resistance in Escherichia coli from humans and food animals, United States, 1950-2002. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 18, 741–749. doi: 10.3201/eid1805.111153

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

von Wintersdorff, C. J., Penders, J., van Niekerk, J. M., Mills, N. D., Majumder, S., van Alphen, L. B., et al. (2016). Dissemination of antimicrobial resistance in microbial ecosystems through horizontal gene transfer. Front. Microbiol. 7:173. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.00173

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, L., Zhao, X., Wang, J., Wang, J., Zhu, L., and Ge, W. (2019). Macrolide-and quinolone-resistant bacteria and resistance genes as indicators of antibiotic resistance gene contamination in farmland soil with manure application. Ecol. Indicat. 106:105456. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.105456

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, Y., Zhang, W., Mhungu, F., Zhang, Y., Liu, Y., Li, Y., et al. (2021). Probabilistic risk assessment of dietary exposure to chloramphenicol in Guangzhou, China. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 18:8805. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18168805

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Watt, A. E., Cummins, M. L., Donato, C. M., Wirth, W., Porter, A. F., Andersson, P., et al. (2025). Parameters for one health genomic surveillance of Escherichia coli from Australia. Nat. Commun. 16:10. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-55103-2

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhang, P., Shen, Z., Zhang, C., Song, L., Wang, B., Shang, J., et al. (2017). Surveillance of antimicrobial resistance among Escherichia coli from chicken and swine, China, 2008-2015. Vet. Microbiol. 203, 49–55. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2017.02.008

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhang, Q. Q., Ying, G. G., Pan, C. G., Liu, Y. S., and Zhao, J. L. (2015). Comprehensive evaluation of antibiotics emission and fate in the river basins of China: Source analysis, multimedia modeling, and linkage to bacterial resistance. Environ. Sci. Technol. 49, 6772–6782. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.5b00729

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhou, Q., Tang, M., Zhang, X., Tang, X., Lu, J., and Gao, Y. (2024). Prevalence, detection of virulence genes and antimicrobial susceptibility of Escherichia coli isolated from arbor acres broilers feeding cycle in China. Front. Vet. Sci. 11:1500355. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2024.1500355

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: Escherichia coli, broiler, antibiotic resistance, multidrug resistance, factor

Citation: Liu X, Li X, Liu J, Chen R, Liu R, Zhao R, Zhao J, Hao J, Yang S, Luo A and Chen A (2025) Antimicrobial resistance of Escherichia coli from broilers in large-scale poultry farms in Shandong Province. Front. Microbiol. 16:1685522. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2025.1685522

Received: 14 August 2025; Revised: 03 November 2025; Accepted: 13 November 2025;
Published: 03 December 2025.

Edited by:

Marta Laranjo, Universidade de Évora, Portugal

Reviewed by:

Arunagirinathan Narasingam, Meenakshi Academy of Higher Education and Research, India
Sakshaleni Rajendiran, Ministry of Health, Malaysia

Copyright © 2025 Liu, Li, Liu, Chen, Liu, Zhao, Zhao, Hao, Yang, Luo and Chen. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Aiguo Luo, bGFnQGp6eHkuZWR1LmNu; Ailiang Chen, YWlsaWFuZy5jaGVuQGdtYWlsLmNvbQ==

These authors have contributed equally to this work

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.