ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Microbiol.
Sec. Terrestrial Microbiology
Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2025.1691167
This article is part of the Research TopicForest Microbiome: Dynamics and Interactions in the Anthropocene Era, Vol IIView all 6 articles
Response of soil fungal community structure and co-occurrence network features on plantations of limestone mountains along habitat specialization gradient
Provisionally accepted- Shandong Agriculture and Engineering University, Jinan, China
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
This study elucidated how different plantation types in limestone mountains shape the community structure and co-occurrence networks of soil fungal habitat-specialization groups, offering a habitat-adaptation perspective on the assembly mechanisms of soil microbial diversity during ecological restoration. In this study, we grouped soil fungi from plantations of coniferous forests (CF), mixed forests (MF)and broad-leaved forests (BF) into habitat-generalists, specialists and opportunists based on niche breadth, and examined how forest type shapes their diversity, community structure and co-occurrence networks along a habitat-specialization gradient. We found that: (1) The number and abundance of habitat-specialists significantly exceeded those of generalists. Habitat-generalists exhibited the highest abundance and ecological niche width in BF, whereas habitat-specialists were most abundant in CF. (2) The diversity index was the highest in BF across all habitat specialization groups. Differences in community structure among forest types increased with habitat specialization, and the composition of dominant tree species significantly influenced the community structure of each group. Soil properties primarily affected the community structure of habitat generalists and opportunists between BF and other forest types. (3) The network structure of habitat specialists exhibited high modularity, while habitat generalists formed independent subnetworks with more fragile structures. CF and BF exhibited strong intra-module connections and high modularity, whereas MF displayed high inter-module connectivity, which reduced their modularity. Both within-module (Zi) and between-module connectivity (Pi) of increased with habitat specialization and the proportion of broadleaved tree species. We concluded that broad-leaved plantations, by increasing soil environmental heterogeneity, promoted the diversity of habitat-specialists and enhancing their network hub roles, representing the optimal strategy for optimizing below-ground biodiversity and stability in limestone mountain forest restoration.
Keywords: Habitat-generalists, Habitat-specialists, network, Afforestation, soil fungi
Received: 25 Aug 2025; Accepted: 20 Oct 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Qiu, Liu, Pan, Wang, Shen, Wang and Shu. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Jing Shu, 15666775677@163.com
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.