Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Microbiol., 29 October 2025

Sec. Terrestrial Microbiology

Volume 16 - 2025 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2025.1705425

Three new entomopathogenic fungal species isolated from soil in China

Tongyi Liu&#x;Tongyi Liu1Wei Chen,&#x;Wei Chen1,2Ke ZhangKe Zhang1Xiangyu HuXiangyu Hu1Alexander BerestetskiyAlexander Berestetskiy3Qiongbo HuQiongbo Hu1Qunfang Weng
Qunfang Weng1*
  • 1College of Plant Protection, State Key Laboratory of Green Pesticides, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China
  • 2Ganzhou Polytechnic, Ganzhou, Jiangxi, China
  • 3All-Russian Research Institute of Plant Protection, Saint Petersburg, Russia

Entomopathogenic fungi play a crucial role in integrated pest management by targeting pests through specific infection mechanisms, offering both environmental compatibility and sustainability. In recent years, the growing challenge of pesticide resistance and the increasing demand for green agriculture have made the exploration of novel entomopathogenic fungal resources a major research focus in biological control. In this study, we employed a combination of traditional morphological characterization and multi-locus phylogenetic analyses to identify and describe three new species: Gongronella yichunensis, Gongronella shangraoensis, and Yunnania jiujiangensis. For the genus Gongronella, the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) and rRNA large subunit (LSU) regions were used for phylogenetic reconstruction, while the genus Yunnania was analyzed using ITS, LSU, β-tubulin (β-TUB), and translation elongation factor (TEF) gene sequences. Furthermore, preliminary bioactivity assessments revealed varying levels of pathogenicity of the new species against Ostrinia furnacalis. Gongronella yichunensis (strain JX09A02) demonstrated the highest virulence, with a median lethal time (LT50) of 7.2 days and a median lethal concentration (LC50) of 28.0 × 106 spores/mL. Gongronella shangraoensis (strain JX20B02) exhibited intermediate efficacy, showing an LT50 of 8.4 days and an LC50 of 92.3 × 106 spores/mL. Yunnania jiujiangensis (strain JX11B02) displayed relatively lower virulence, with an LT50 of 9.5 days and an LC50 of 243.8 × 106 spores/mL. These findings not only enrich the genetic resources of entomopathogenic fungi in China but also provide a valuable theoretical and germplasm foundation for developing novel biocontrol agents.

1 Introduction

Insect pests pose a severe threat to global agricultural production. Within integrated pest management (IPM) systems, chemical pesticides have long played a dominant role; however, their application has become increasingly limited due to growing resistance, reduced efficacy, and adverse effects on the environment and non-target organisms (Baker et al., 2020; Galli et al., 2024). Currently, global pesticide research and development are shifting significantly toward environmentally friendly biopesticides (Galli et al., 2024). Among these, entomopathogenic fungi, as important microbial insecticides, demonstrate broad application prospects in biological control (Nunes et al., 2024; Shehzad et al., 2025). To date, there are more than 1,000 species of EPF discovered in the world (Gielen et al., 2024). The highly bioactive entomopathogenic fungi (EPF), such as Beauveria bassiana, Metarhizium anisopliae, and Purpureocillium lilacinum, have been widely employed as biological control agents in agricultural pest management and are registered in many countries as mycopesticides (Jiang and Wang, 2023).

Entomopathogenic fungi (EPF) present a sustainable alternative to chemical pesticides due to their lower environmental toxicity, higher biodegradability, and stronger host specificity. Unlike chemicals, EPF typically infects insects by penetrating the cuticle via specialized structures, including appressoria and germ tubes. This contact-based infection mechanism, which is functionally analogous to the “contact toxicity” of chemical insecticides, enables EPF to effectively control piercing-sucking pests such as aphids and whiteflies (Ranadev et al., 2025; Saminathan et al., 2025). This is a characteristic that bacterial and viral insecticides do not possess (Jiang and Wang, 2023). In fact, EPF are not merely entomopathogens killing insects; they play important roles in natural ecosystems through multi-level trophic interactions, such as saprophytes, plant endophytes, and parasites (Vega, 2018; Ranesi et al., 2024). For example, the wheat endophytic Bea. bassiana and Met. robertsii alters the plants’ secondary metabolites, thereby inhibiting the population growth of insect pests Rhopalosiphum padi and Aphis fabae (Rasool et al., 2021), while the interactions of Syncephalastrum sp. (Mucorales) with fungus gardens and leaf-cutter ants offer new opportunities in their integrated pest management (Barcoto et al., 2017; Bautz et al., 2023). However, EPF still faces challenges such as insufficient resources and suboptimal efficacy, which hinder its development (Deka et al., 2021).

In the pursuit of expanding the repertoire of microbial resources applicable to pest management, this study identified and characterized two novel species of the genus GongronellaGongronella yichunensis and Gongronella shangraoensis—along with one new species of the genus Yunnania, Yunnania jiujiangensis, employing an integrated taxonomic approach combining classical morphological observation with molecular phylogenetic analysis. Moreover, the insecticidal efficacy of these three novel species was evaluated against Ostrinia furnacalis. These findings significantly broaden the scope of known microbial diversity and offer valuable germplasm resources for advancing eco-friendly pest control strategies, thereby providing both a theoretical framework and experimental evidence for developing novel bio-insecticides.

2 Materials and methods

2.1 Soil sample collection

Soil samples were collected in Jiangxi Province, China, in June 2023 using a five-point sampling method. At each sampling site, the topsoil layer (10–20 cm depth) was collected. Each sample, with a weight of approximately 100 g, was placed in a self-sealing bag. The longitude, latitude, specific geographical location, and habitat type of each sampling site were documented in detail (Supplementary Table 1). All samples were stored at 4 °C for subsequent processing (Mariappan et al., 2025).

2.2 Fungal isolation and culture

Soil samples were sieved through a 0.45mm mesh to collect the fine soil fraction. Two 10 g aliquots of the fine soil were each mixed with 100 mL of 0.1% Tween-80 solution. The mixtures were vortexed and subsequently allowed to stand for 10 min to form a soil suspension for subsequent use. A 100μL aliquot of the suspension was spread evenly onto a selective medium (containing, per liter of distilled water: 200 g potato, 20 g glucose, 20 g agar, 50 mg chloramphenicol, 50 mg cycloheximide, and 50 mg rose bengal), with three replicates per treatment. The inoculated plates were incubated at 26 ± 1 °C until single colonies were observed. Thereafter, individual colonies were picked with an inoculation loop and transferred to Potato Dextrose Agar (PDA) medium (containing, per liter of distilled water: 200 g potato, 20 g glucose, and 20 g agar) to obtain pure cultures. The purification procedure was repeated iteratively until complete strain purification was achieved (Chen et al., 2021).

2.3 Morphological observation of fungal strains

In this study, hyphal and conidial morphology were examined using both light microscopy (MC-D500U, Phoenix, Jiangxi, China) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Colony morphology on the obverse and reverse sides was systematically documented on various culture media, including Potato Dextrose Agar (PDA), Dichloran Glycerol (18%) Agar (DG18), Czapek Yeast Extract Agar (CYA), Malt Extract Agar (MEA), and Czapek-Dox Agar (CDA). For SEM sample preparation, fungal plugs (5 mm in diameter) were inoculated onto PDA plates alongside sterile aluminum foil strips. The cultures were incubated in darkness at 26 ± 1 °C until approximately two-thirds of the foil surface was colonized by mycelia. The foil specimens with adherent mycelia and spores were then subjected to fixation, dehydration, critical-point drying, and gold sputtering prior to SEM imaging (Chen et al., 2024).

2.4 DNA extraction, PCR amplification, and sequencing

Fungal genomic DNA was extracted from colonies grown on PDA for a week, using a fungal DNA extraction kit (OMEGA, D3195-02) and the protocol provided by the manufacturer. The genomic loci: internal transcribed spacer (ITS), rRNA large subunit (LSU), translation elongation factor 1-alpha (TEF), β-tubulin (β-tub) were amplified by PCR. For PCR, the primer pairs, ITS1/ITS4, LR5/LR0R, EF983F/EF2218R, and BT2a/BT2b (Castlebury et al., 2004; Rehner et al., 2011), were employed. The PCR products were validated by 1% agarose gel electrophoresis to display a single clear band, and then they were sequenced by the Sanger method (performed by Zhejiang Youkang Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Hangzhou, China).

2.5 Molecular phylogenetic analysis

By incorporating representative strains of the target genus from the GenBank database, a concatenated multi-locus phylogenetic analysis was performed using appropriate genetic markers to further elucidate the taxonomic placement of these isolates. Phylogenetic analyses were carried out using both Maximum Likelihood (ML) and Bayesian Inference (BI) methods. Sequence alignment was performed using the MAFFT version 7 web server,1 employing the iterative optimization strategy (FFT-NS-i) for multiple sequence alignment (MSA) (Nakamura et al., 2018). The low-quality alignment positions of sequences were removed by Gblocks (Xiang et al., 2023). The optimal partitioning strategy and evolutionary models for phylogenetic tree construction were selected using ModelFinder for both IQ-TREE and MrBayes (Kalyaanamoorthy et al., 2017). An ML phylogenetic tree was constructed using IQ-TREE software. To assess the stability of the tree topology, bootstrap analysis was conducted with 1,000 repetitions. A BI phylogenetic tree was constructed using MrBayes software. To ensure reliable results, the Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) run was set to 2,000,000 generations, with sampling every 1,000 generations, and the first 25% of the unstable samples were discarded (Ronquist et al., 2012). The phylogenetic trees generated by both ML and BI analyses were visualized using MEGA v7 and FigTree V 1.4.3. The sequence information for the strains investigated in this study is summarized in Supplementary Tables 2, 3.

2.6 Bioactivity assays of fungal strains

The experimental subjects were third-instar larvae of Ostrinia furnacalis, which had been laboratory-reared for five generations with an artificial diet (43 g cornmeal, 43 g soybean flour, 26 g yeast extract, 26 g glucose, 1.5 g multivitamin complex, 5.7 g agar, and 1.5 g sorbic acid). Bioassays were conducted following the China Agricultural Industry Standard NY/T 1154.6–2006 for insecticidal bioassays in the laboratory, with minor modifications (Chen et al., 2024). Conidia of the tested strains were suspended in a 0.05% Tween 80 solution to a stock of 1 × 108, 1 × 107, 1 × 106, and 1 × 105 spores/mL. The third-instar larvae of O. furnacalis were immersed in conidia suspension for 10 s. After dryness, the larvae were transferred to individual dishes and incubated at 25 ± 1 °C. Larvae were fed the artificial diet, which was changed every 2 days. Mortalities were recorded every day, and the dead larvae were transferred to Petri dishes for incubation for mycelial growth. Subsequently, the fungi emerging from the cadavers were re-isolated onto PDA plates and identified morphologically to confirm pathogenicity in accordance with Koch’s postulates. Control groups were treated with a 0.05% Tween-80 solution. There were three repeats with 10 larvae in each treatment. The same test was replicated twice. An ANOVA was performed using SPSS version 26.0 (IBM, USA) to test the significance. Data were compared with Duncan’s multiple range test (DMRT). Statistical significance was considered at a p-value of < 0.05. The values of LT50 and LC50 were evaluated based on the probit regression analysis (LC-p/LT-p analysis). The DPS version 9.01 (Data Processing System, Hongzhou, China) software was used to complete the statistical analyses.

3 Results

3.1 Phylogenetic analysis reveals new species

3.1.1 Genus Gongronella

Based on the ITS and LSU sequences, a phylogenetic tree of the genus Gongronella was constructed using the putative new species strains JX20B02 (GDMCC 3.1082), JX09A02 (GDMCC 3.1080), and JX15B03, as well as the typical material of the species retrieved from the NCBI database.2 Cunninghamella echinulata (CBS 156.28) was used as the outgroup. The analysis was performed using the Bayesian method (GTR + F + G4 model) and IQtree analysis (TN + F + R2 model). The multi-gene dataset consisted of 1,465 base pairs, derived from the ITS (1–533 bp) and LSU (534–1,465 bp) regions. The results indicated that the strain JX20B02 (GDMCC 3.1082) with G. eborensis forms a well-supported clade with the Bayesian posterior probability (BI) and IQtree bootstrap support (BI = 0.85, ML = 93). Meanwhile, the strains JX09A02 (GDMCC 3.1080) and JX15B03 formed a clade (BI = 0.78, ML = 88) and clustered together with G. chlamydospora (BI = 1, ML = 100) (Figure 1).

Figure 1
Phylogenetic tree depicting various Gongronella species and their relationships. It includes species names, branch support values, and genetic distances. Key species highlighted in bold are Gongronella shangracoensis GDMC 3.1082, Gongronella yichunensis GDMC 3.1080, and Gongronella yichunensis JX15803. The scale bar represents a genetic distance of 0.05.

Figure 1. Phylogenetic tree of Gongronella generated from a concatenated multi-locus dataset. The tree was constructed based on the sequences of ITS and LSU. Bayesian posterior probability (BI ≥ 0.50) and IQtree bootstrap support values (ML ≥ 50) are labeled on the branch in the following order: BI/ML. BI < 0.50 and ML < 50 are marked as “*,” which suggests the branch with lower credibility. Cunninghamella echinulata (CBS 156.28) served as the outgroup of the phylogenetic trees, while the other type strains were retrieved from the MycoBank database (https://www.mycobank.org/).

3.1.2 Genus Yunnania

Phylogenetic analysis of the genus Yunnania was conducted using a concatenated dataset of four loci from six taxa, with Microascus cirrosus CBS 462.97 as the outgroup. The concatenated dataset comprised 2,879 bp, including ITS (1–585 bp), LSU (586–1,454 bp), TEF (1,455–2,378 bp), and β-tub (2379–2,879 bp). The analysis was performed using the Bayesian method (GTR + G + F model) and IQtree analysis (TN + G4 + F model). The results showed that JX11B02 (GDMCC 3.1081) and Y. penicillata clustered within a major clade (BI/ML = 0.99/95) but exhibited considerable genetic distance between them (Figure 2).

Figure 2
Phylogenetic tree displaying relationships among Yunnania species and Microascus cirrosus. Branches include Yunnania jijuiangensis, Yunnania penicillata CBS 130296, Yunnania carbonaria CBS 121662 and CBS 205.61, and Yunnania smithii CBS 855.68. Support values are indicated on the branches, such as 0.99/95 and 1/98. Microascus cirrosus CBS 462.97 serves as an outgroup, and a scale bar equals 0.01 distance units.

Figure 2. Phylogenetic tree of Yunnania generated from a concatenated multi-locus dataset. The tree was constructed based on the sequences of ITS, LSU, TEF, and β-tub. The concatenated dataset comprised 2,879 bp, including ITS (1–585 bp), LSU (586–1,454 bp), TEF-α (1455–2,378 bp), and tub2 (2379–2,879 bp). Bayesian posterior probabilities (BI ≥ 0.50) and IQtree bootstrap support values (ML ≥ 50) were annotated on branches in the order of BI/ML. Microascus cirrosus CBS 462.97 was designated as the outgroup for the phylogenetic tree.

3.2 Taxonomy

Gongronella yichunensis Q. Hu & W. Chen, sp. nov.

Mycobank number: MB859592. Index Fungorum number: IF903766.

Etymology: Named after the type locality, Yichun City (Jiangxi Province, China).

Asexual morph: Hyphae hyaline, 5.10–7.28 μm wide. Sporangiophores, borne on aerial hyphae, erect to slightly curved, sympodially branched, hyaline, smooth-walled, 17.8–70.8 × 1.6–3.23 μm, and aseptate or with one septum. Fertile sporangia, hyaline, globose, 10.14–12.14 μm in diameter, and smooth-walled. Apophyses, hyaline, smooth-walled, predominantly ellipsoid, 6.18–7.27 × 5.36–5.91 μm. Sporangiospores, hyaline, smooth-walled, mainly reniform, and 2.35–3.52 × 1.17–1.41 μm in diameter. Rhizoids, hyaline, branched, and irregularly shaped (Figure 3). Chlamydospores and Zygospores: not observed.

Figure 3
Under different culture media, strains exhibited diverse growth morphologies and colorations (a-j). An Ostrinia furnacalis larva showing extensive hyphal growth after fungal infection is presented in panel k. Ultrastructural features under electron microscopy are displayed in panels l and o, while morphological characteristics observed under optical microscopy are shown in panels m and n.

Figure 3. Morphological characteristics of Gongronella yichunensis. (a,c,e,g,i) Colony obverse at 7-day cultivation on PDA/MEA/DG18/CYA/CDA plate; (b,d,f,h,j) colony reverse at 7-day cultivation on PDA/MEA/DG18/CYA/CDA plate; (k) symptom of O. furnacalis treated the fungus after 4 days; (l,m,n) sporangiophores with variously shaped apophyses and sporangia; (o) sporangia and sporangiospores. — Scale (a–j) = 1 cm.

Culture characteristics (after 7 days of incubation at 26 ± 1 °C in darkness): PDA: 47.33 ± 0.47 mm diameter, obverse creamy white, cottony texture; reverse pale yellow. CDA: 36.67 ± 0.94 mm diameter, obverse irregular, circular form with a white, cottony texture; reverse white. CYA: 57.67 ± 0.47 mm, obverse white, velvety texture with distinctive concentric ring patterns and radiating fissures; reverse pale yellow with prominent radiating solar-like patterns. DG18: 37.33 ± 0.94 mm, obverse creamy texture; reverse milky white. MEA: 63.67 ± 0.47 mm, obverse irregular, felt-like with clear radiating fissures; reverse pale yellow (Figure 3).

Holotype: Strain JX09A02 (GDMCC 3.1080), isolated from crop soil in Yifeng County, Yichun City, Jiangxi Province, China. Collected by W. Chen in June 2023. The strain is preserved in the Guangdong Microbial Culture Collection Center (GDMCC).

Note: G. yichunensis and G. chlamydospora clustered within a single clade, indicating a close phylogenetic relationship between the two species. However, they exhibit significant morphological differences compared to G. chlamydospora. The two species can be distinguished morphologically by their sporangium diameter, G. yichunensis with a significantly smaller sporangium diameter (ca. 11.14 μm) compared to G. chlamydospora (19.5 μm). Furthermore, sequence comparison of the ribosomal ITS regions revealed 20 bp differences between G. yichunensis and G. chlamydospora.

Gongronella shangraoensis Q. Weng & W. Chen, sp. nov.

Mycobank number: MB859593. Index Fungorum number: IF903767.

Etymology: Named after the type locality, Shangrao City (Jiangxi Province, China).

Asexual morph: Hyphae hyaline: 3.82–5.76 μm wide. Sporangiophores: borne on aerial hyphae, erect, sympodially branched, 21.2–42.5 × 1.49–2.25 μm, hyaline, smooth-walled, and mostly aseptate or with one septum. Fertile sporangia: hyaline, terminal on sporangiophores, globose, 4.14–4.86 μm in diameter, and smooth-walled. Apophyses: hyaline, smooth-walled, and globose to ovoid (2.06–2.38 × 2.30–3.71 μm). Sporangiospores: hyaline, smooth-walled, predominantly ovoid to reniform, and 2.60–2.87 × 1.40–1.53 μm. Rhizoids: hyaline, branched, and irregularly shaped (Figure 4). Chlamydospores and Zygospores: not observed.

Figure 4
Under different culture media, strains exhibited diverse growth morphologies and colorations (a-j). An Ostrinia furnacalis larva showing extensive hyphal growth after fungal infection is presented in panel k. Ultrastructural features under electron microscopy are displayed in panels l and n, while morphological characteristics observed under optical microscopy are shown in panel m.

Figure 4. Morphological characteristics of Gongronella shangraoensis. (a,c,e,g,i) Colony obverse at 7-day cultivation on PDA/MEA/CYA/CDA/DG18 plate; (b,d,f,h,j) colony reverse at 7-day cultivation on PDA/MEA/DG18/CYA/CDA plate; (k) symptom of O. furnacalis treated the fungus after 4 days; (l,m) sporangiophores with variously shaped apophyses and sporangia; (n) Sporangiospores. — Scale (a–j) = 1 cm.

Culture characteristics (after 7 days of incubation at 26 ± 1 °C in darkness): PDA: diameter of 51.33 ± 1.25 mm; obverse off-white, cottony texture; reverse pale yellow. CDA: 37 ± 1.63 mm; obverse irregular circular shapes, cottony white texture; reverse white. CYA: 63 ± 0.82 mm; obverse floccose white surface with concentric rings and radial cracks; reverse pale yellow with distinct radial striations. DG18: 38 ± 0.82 mm; obverse cream-colored; reverse off-white. MEA: 65.33 ± 3.77 mm; obverse irregular, felt-like, with distinct radial cracks; reverse pale yellow (Figure 4).

Holotype: Strain JX20B02 (GDMCC 3.1082) was isolated from forest soil in Guangfeng District, Shangrao City, Jiangxi Province, China, collected by Wei Chen in June 2023. The strain is preserved in the Guangdong Microbial Culture Collection Center (GDMCC).

Note: G. shangraoensis and G. eborensis demonstrated a close relationship; however, they can be distinguished morphologically by the size of their sporangia. G. shangraoensis exhibits a significantly smaller sporangium diameter (ca. 4.50 μm) compared to G. eborensis (11.75 μm). Furthermore, sequence comparison of the ribosomal ITS and LSU regions revealed 17 bp and 11 bp differences between G. shangraoensis and G. eborensis in the ITS and LSU regions, respectively.

Yunnania jiujiangensis W. Chen & Q. Weng, sp. nov.

Mycobank number: MB859596. Index Fungorum number: IF903765.

Etymology: Named based on the isolated location Jiujiang, Jiangxi Province.

Asexual morph: Vegetative hyphae: hyaline, 2.21–3.08 μm wide. Conidiophores: solitary, hyaline, erect, arising from aerial hyphae, mycelium-like, without a distinct stipe, 4.66–9.32 × 2.21–3.43 μm, and smooth-walled. Phialides: borne directly on the conidiophores, monoverticillate, and 5.24–8.16 × 0.36–1.74 μm. Conidia: ellipsoidal, smooth-walled, truncate at base, 4.37–6.31 × 3.40–3.78 μm, and forming irregular to regular cylindrical chains (Figure 5).

Figure 5
Under different culture media, strains exhibited diverse growth morphologies and colorations (a-j). An Ostrinia furnacalis larva showing extensive hyphal growth after fungal infection is presented in panel k. Ultrastructural features under electron microscopy are displayed in panel m, while morphological characteristics observed under optical microscopy are shown in panel l.

Figure 5. Morphological characteristics of Yunnania jiujiangensis. (a,c,e,g,i) Colony obverse at 7-day cultivation on PDA/DG18/CDA/CYA/MEA plate; (b,d,f,h,j) colony reverse at 7-day cultivation on PDA/MEA/DG18/CYA/CDA plate; (k) symptom of O. furnacalis treated the fungus after 4 days; (l) Sporulating structures and conidia; (m) Conidia. — Scale (a–j) = 1 cm.

Cultural characteristics (after 7 days of incubation at 26 ± 1 °C in darkness): PDA: 22.33 ± 0.47 mm; obverse jet-black center with white cottony margin; reverse black centrally, white peripherally. DG18: 15.67 ± 0.47 mm; obverse pale yellow with irregularly serrate margin; reverse light yellow peripherally, dark green centrally. CDA: 18.92 ± 0.82 mm; obverse olive-brown, floccose with radiating margin; reverse uniformly olive-brown. CYA: 28.67 ± 0.47 mm; obverse regularly circular, dark green velvety texture, center with white margin; reverse dark green centrally fading to white. MEA: 23.67 ± 1.25 mm; grayish-white with distinct radial striations; reverse yellowish-brown peripherally, dark green centrally (Figure 5).

Holotype: Strain JX11B02 (GDMCC 3.1081) was isolated from soil in a forest habitat in Pengze County, Jiujiang City, Jiangxi Province, China. The sample was collected by Wei Chen in June 2023. The strain is preserved in the Guangdong Microbial Culture Collection Center (GDMCC).

Notes: Phylogenetic analysis showed that strains Y. jiujiangensis and Y. penicillata clustered in one clade with a close relationship. Y. jiujiangensis is similar to Y. penicillata, but the former phialides are borne directly on the conidiophores, metulae are rarely present or absent, penicilli exhibit fewer tiers of branching, typically monoverticillate; while the latter metulae are conspicuously present, phialides arise from metulae, and penicilli display more complex branching with two or more tiers. Furthermore, the conidial dimensions of the former (4.37–6.31 × 3.40–3.78 μm) are notably larger than those of the latter (4.0–5.9 × 2.5–3.5 μm).

3.3 Bioactivity of the new species against Ostrinia furnacalis

All three fungal strains exhibited certain levels of pathogenicity against Ostrinia furnacalis. On day 9 post-treatment, insect mortality rates in groups treated with a suspension concentration of 1 × 108 spores/mL exceeded 40%. Specifically, strain JX09A02 induced a mortality rate of 70%, while JX20B02 reached 53.33%. Strain JX09A02 demonstrated the highest virulence, with a median lethal time (LT50) of 7.2 days and a median lethal concentration (LC50) of 28.0 × 106 spores/mL. Strain JX20B02 showed intermediate efficacy, with an LT50 of 8.4 days and an LC50 of 92.3 × 106 spores/mL. Strain JX11B02 displayed relatively lower virulence, requiring 9.5 days for LT50 and achieving LC50 at 243.8 × 106 spores/mL. The relevant parameters are provided in Table 1 and Figure 6.

Table 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. Estimation of LC50/LT50 of new fungal species against third instar larvae of Ostrinia furnacalis.

Figure 6
Three bar graphs labeled a, b, and c, showing mortality percentages over days after treatment with different spore concentrations. Each graph represents a sample labeled JX09A02, JX20B02, and JX11B02, respectively. Mortality increases with the concentration of spores from blue (control) to yellow (highest concentration) across nine days. The x-axis shows days after treatment, and the y-axis shows mortality percentage.

Figure 6. Bioassay of new species against 3rd instar larvae of Ostrinia furnacalis. (a) G. yichunensis JX09A02 (GDMCC 3.1080). (b) G. shangraoensis JX20B02 (GDMCC 3.1082). (C) Y. jiujiangensis JX11B02 (GDMCC 3.1081). Control groups were treated with a 0.05% Tween-80 solution.

4 Discussion

EPF are often soil inhabitants; large numbers of EPF can persist for a long time in soil. Sometimes, they can also reproduce in the rhizosphere of plants, thereby maintaining a certain population level in the soil (Chen et al., 2021). Following infection by entomopathogenic fungi (EPF), the fungus proliferates extensively on or within the insect host, producing numerous spores (Ma et al., 2024). These spores are then released into the environment. A portion of these dispersed spores can enter a dormant state in the soil, which enhances their survival during unfavorable conditions like cold or drought. This dormancy allows them to persist until the return of suitable hosts or growth conditions triggers their germination (Shin et al., 2020; Quesada-Moraga et al., 2024). Furthermore, soil is a key source for EPF genetic resources. In recent years, many new EPF species have been isolated and identified from soil (Konopická et al., 2024; Sun et al., 2024; Liu et al., 2025). In practice, we identified several factors that influence the EPF isolation. First isolating fungi from excessively moist soils is challenging because high humidity severely affects fungal survival in the soil (Romero et al., 2022). Second, the storage conditions of soil samples are critical. Typically, storing soil samples at 0 °C for 3–6 months does not affect fungal isolation from the soil; however, prolonged storage leads to a rapid decrease in the number of fungi present in the samples. Furthermore, repetitive operations also affect the isolation results of fungal species in each sample, and repeating the process twice can significantly increase the number of isolated fungal species. Variations in collection sites and sampling times may also contribute to discrepancies in the results (Wang et al., 2025). This study has effectively controlled the aforementioned factors; therefore, the research findings presented are credible and reliable.

The phylogenetic analysis methods in fungal taxonomic research have undergone a critical paradigm shift from single-locus to multilocus approaches. Although early studies widely relied on single loci such as ITS for preliminary identification due to their accessibility and comprehensive database coverage, these markers exhibit limited phylogenetic information and low resolution, often failing to accurately resolve interspecific or intraspecific relationships among recently diverged or complex lineages (Luecking et al., 2020; Kauserud, 2023). Moreover, single-gene analyses are prone to topological errors caused by gene introgression or incomplete lineage sorting. With advances in molecular techniques, multilocus phylogenetic analysis has become the standard practice in contemporary taxonomic studies (Dong et al., 2024). By integrating multiple genetic markers—including ribosomal regions (ITS, LSU) and protein-coding genes (e.g., TEF1-α, β-tubulin, RPB1, and RPB2)—this approach significantly enhances nodal support and robustness in phylogenetic inference (Heled and Drummond, 2010; Manawasinghe et al., 2025). Consequently, it not only improves the resolution of morphologically similar or cryptic species but also provides a reliable evolutionary framework for reassessing higher taxonomic ranks. Nie et al. conducted a multi-locus phylogenetic analysis employing sequences of the large subunit nuclear ribosomal DNA (nLSU), small subunit nuclear ribosomal DNA (nSSU), mitochondrial small subunit ribosomal DNA (mtSSU), and translation elongation factor 1-alpha (tef1). This comprehensive study necessitated a taxonomic revision of the classical circumscription of Conidiobolus, resulting in the proposal of three novel genera: Capillidium, Microconidiobolus, and Neoconidiobolus (Nie et al., 2020). Kobmoo et al. employed an integrated research strategy combining phylogenetic analysis, morphological observation, liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry (LC–MS)-based metabolomics, and virulence assays to systematically resolve taxonomic issues in the Metarhizium anisopliae species complex (Kobmoo et al., 2024). This study provides comprehensive theoretical guidance for addressing challenges in delineating closely related species and infraspecific taxonomic units. Such an integrated approach, based on cross-disciplinary and cross-institutional collaboration, can significantly benefit future fungal taxonomic studies.

In this study, species identification was accomplished through an integrated taxonomic strategy combining morphological observations with molecular phylogenetic analyses (Wang et al., 2024; Lin et al., 2025). To strengthen phylogenetic robustness, multi-locus phylogenetic reconstructions were performed using the internal transcribed spacer (ITS), large subunit of nuclear ribosomal RNA (nrLSU), translation elongation factor 1-alpha (tef1), and beta-tubulin (tub2) gene regions. Isolates were cultivated on diverse culture media to systematically record phenotypic and developmental characteristics. Ultimately, three novel species were delineated: Gongronella yichunensis, Gongronella shangraoensis, and Yunnania jiujiangensis.

This study conducted a preliminary assessment of the bioactivity of the newly identified fungal species. The results demonstrated that strains JX09A02 (G. yichunensis), JX11B02 (Y. jiujiangensis), and JX20B02 (G. shangraoensis) all exhibited varying levels of insecticidal activity against the lepidopteran pest Ostrinia furnacalis, highlighting their potential as biocontrol agents. However, these findings, derived from initial experiments with a single target pest, are insufficient to fully evaluate their practical efficacy. To bridge this knowledge gap, a two-pronged approach is recommended for future research. First, subsequent laboratory studies should expand the range of target pests to include other taxonomically important groups (e.g., Coleoptera and Hemiptera) to systematically elucidate their insecticidal spectrum and host range. Second, and crucially, laboratory-based bioassays cannot replicate the complex field environment. Therefore, systematic field trials are urgently needed to translate these findings into practical pest management strategies. In such trials, to maximize spore viability and infection efficiency, the application of fungal inoculants should be preferentially conducted during periods such as late afternoon, on overcast days, or when crop canopy humidity remains high, thereby mitigating the detrimental effects of UV irradiation and facilitating spore germination and host invasion (Jamunarani et al., 2022).

Furthermore, the mechanisms underlying their bioactivity require in-depth investigation. It is hypothesized that the activity may involve one or more modes of action, including cuticular penetration, toxin secretion, immunosuppression, or nutrient competition. These mechanisms should be validated through multidisciplinary approaches such as histopathology, molecular toxicology, and metabolomics. Elucidating the mode of action will not only enhance the understanding of the physiological and ecological interactions between the fungal strains and their hosts but also provide a theoretical foundation for the targeted selection of highly active strains, the development of effective formulations, and the design of field application strategies.

5 Conclusion

Through a combined multigene phylogenetic analysis and morphological examination, this study successfully identified and described three novel species: Gongronella yichunensis, Gongronella shangraoensis, and Yunnania jiujiangensis. Preliminary insecticidal activity assessment revealed significant biocontrol potential of these species against larvae of Ostrinia furnacalis, demonstrating their practical value in pest management. These findings not only expand the repository of entomopathogenic fungal resources in China but also provide a crucial theoretical and germplasm foundation for the development of novel biocontrol agents.

Data availability statement

The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. The names of the repository/repositories and accession number(s) can be found in the article/Supplementary material.

Ethics statement

The manuscript presents research on animals that do not require ethical approval for their study.

Author contributions

TL: Investigation, Methodology, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. WC: Conceptualization, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – original draft. KZ: Methodology, Validation, Writing – original draft. XH: Investigation, Visualization, Writing – original draft. AB: Conceptualization, Writing – original draft. QH: Conceptualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. QW: Supervision, Writing – review & editing.

Funding

The author(s) declare that financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article. This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant number 32361133546).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Generative AI statement

The authors declare that no Gen AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.

Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2025.1705425/full#supplementary-material

Footnotes

References

Baker, B. P., Green, T. A., and Loker, A. J. (2020). Biological control and integrated pest management in organic and conventional systems. Biol. Control 140:4095. doi: 10.1016/j.biocontrol.2019.104095

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Barcoto, M. O., Pedrosa, F., Bueno, O. C., and Rodrigues, A. (2017). Pathogenic nature of Syncephalastrum in Atta sexdens rubropilosa fungus gardens. Pest Manag. Sci. 73, 999–1009. doi: 10.1002/ps.4416

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Bautz, K. R., Caixeta, M. C. S., Del Puppo, N. P., Rodrigues, A., Kloss, T. G., and Elliot, S. L. (2023). Limited impacts of the fungus Syncephalastrum on nests of leaf-cutting ants. Fungal Ecol. 62:1198. doi: 10.1016/j.funeco.2022.101198

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Castlebury, L. A., Rossman, A. Y., Gi-Ho, S., Hyten, A. S., and Spatafora, J. W. (2004). Multigene phylogeny reveals new lineage for Stachybotrys chartarum, the indoor air fungus. Mycol. Res. 108, 864–872. doi: 10.1017/s0953756204000607

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Chen, W., Tang, Y., Liu, T., Hu, H., Ou, C., Hu, Q., et al. (2024). Purpureocillium jiangxiense sp. nov.: Entomopathogenic effects on Ostrinia furnacalis and galleria mellonella. Microorganisms 12:1041. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms12061041

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Chen, W., Xie, W., Cai, W., Thaochan, N., and Hu, Q. (2021). Entomopathogenic fungi biodiversity in the soil of three provinces located in Southwest China and first approach to evaluate their biocontrol potential. J. Fungi 7:984. doi: 10.3390/jof7110984

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Deka, B., Baruah, C., and Babu, A. (2021). Entomopathogenic microorganisms: their role in insect pest management. Egypt. J. Biol. Pest Control 31, 1–8. doi: 10.1186/s41938-021-00466-7

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Dong, J. H., Li, Q., Yuan, Q., Luo, Y. X., Zhang, X. C., Dai, Y. F., et al. (2024). Species diversity, taxonomy, molecular systematics and divergence time of wood-inhabiting fungi in Yunnan-Guizhou plateau, Asia. Mycosphere 15, 1110–1293. doi: 10.5943/mycosphere/15/1/10

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Galli, M., Feldmann, F., Vogler, U. K., and Kogel, K.-H. (2024). Can biocontrol be the game-changer in integrated pest management? A review of definitions, methods and strategies. J. Plant Dis. Prot. 131, 265–291. doi: 10.1007/s41348-024-00878-1

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Gielen, R., Ude, K., Kaasik, A., Poldmaa, K., Teder, T., and Tammaru, T. (2024). Entomopathogenic Fungi as mortality agents in insect populations: a review. Ecol. Evol. 14:e70666. doi: 10.1002/ece3.70666

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Heled, J., and Drummond, A. J. (2010). Bayesian inference of species trees from multilocus data. Mol. Biol. Evol. 27, 570–580. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msp274

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Jamunarani, G. S., Ramanagouda, S. H., Venkateshalu, B., Jayappa, J., Raghavendra, G., Rudresh, D. L., et al. (2022). Isolation and evaluation of indigenous endophytic entomopathogenic fungus, Beauveria bassiana UHSB-END1 (Hypocreales: Cordycipitaceae), against Spodoptera litura Fabricius. Egypt. J. Biol. Pest Control 32:120. doi: 10.1186/s41938-022-00617-4

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Jiang, Y., and Wang, J. (2023). The registration situation and use of mycopesticides in the world. J. Fungi (Basel, Switzerland) 9:940. doi: 10.3390/jof9090940

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Kalyaanamoorthy, S., Minh, B. Q., Wong, T. K., Von Haeseler, A., and Jermiin, L. S. (2017). Modelfinder: fast model selection for accurate phylogenetic estimates. Nat. Methods 14, 587–589. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.4285

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Kauserud, H. (2023). ITS alchemy: on the use of ITS as a DNA marker in fungal ecology. Fungal Ecol. 65:1274. doi: 10.1016/j.funeco.2023.101274

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Kobmoo, N., Mongkolsamrit, S., Khonsanit, A., Cedeno-Sanchez, M., Arnamnart, N., Noisripoom, W., et al. (2024). Integrative taxonomy of Metarhizium anisopliae species complex, based on phylogenomics combined with morphometrics, metabolomics, and virulence data. IMA Fungus 15:30. doi: 10.1186/s43008-024-00154-9

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Konopická, J., Habustová, O. S., Jánova, N., Zurovcová, M., Dolezal, P., and Zemek, R. (2024). Isolation and identification of entomopathogenic fungi strains for Colorado potato beetle (Leptinotarsa decemlineata) control. J. Appl. Microbiol. 135:lxae213. doi: 10.1093/jambio/lxae213

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Lin, L., Lin, Y., Keyhani, N. O., Pu, H., Yang, J., Xiong, C., et al. (2025). New entomopathogenic species in the Clavicipitaceae family (Hypocreales, Ascomycota) from the subtropical forests of Fujian, China. Front. Microbiol. 16:2341. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2025.1532341

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Liu, T., Chen, W., Tang, Y., Liu, F., Yao, L., Hu, Q., et al. (2025). Two novel entomopathogenic fungal species of Lecanicillium isolated from soil in China. BMC Microbiol. 25:49. doi: 10.1186/s12866-025-03765-3

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Luecking, R., Aime, M. C., Robbertse, B., Miller, A. N., Ariyawansa, H. A., Aoki, T., et al. (2020). Unambiguous identification of fungi: where do we stand and how accurate and precise is fungal DNA barcoding? IMA Fungus 11:14. doi: 10.1186/s43008-020-00033-z

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Ma, M. Q., Luo, J., Li, C., Eleftherianos, I., Zhang, W., and Xu, L. T. (2024). A life-and-death struggle: interaction of insects with entomopathogenic fungi across various infection stages. Front. Immunol. 14:9843. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1329843

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Manawasinghe, I. S., Hyde, K. D., Wanasinghe, D. N., Karunarathna, S. C., Maharachchikumbura, S. S. N., Samarakoon, M. C., et al. (2025). Fungal diversity notes 1818-1918: taxonomic and phylogenetic contributions on genera and species of fungi. Fungal Divers. 130, 1–261. doi: 10.1007/s13225-024-00541-y

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Mariappan, K., Samuel, J. N., Uthandi, S., Sevugapperumal, N., Subbarayalu, M., and Krishnamoorthi, P. (2025). Harnessing the potential of indigenous entomopathogenic fungi isolated from the soils of Tamil Nadu, India, for the management of the cotton aphid, Aphis gossypii glover (Hemiptera: Aphididae). J. Cotton Res. 8:34. doi: 10.1186/s42397-025-00232-2

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Nakamura, T., Yamada, K. D., Tomii, K., and Katoh, K. (2018). Parallelization of MAFFT for large-scale multiple sequence alignments. Bioinformatics 34, 2490–2492. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty121

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Nie, Y., Yu, D. S., Wang, C. F., Liu, X. Y., and Huang, B. (2020). A taxonomic revision of the genus Conidiobolus (Ancylistaceae, Entomophthorales): four clades including three new genera. Mycokeys 66, 55–81. doi: 10.3897/mycokeys.66.46575

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Nunes, P. S. O., Lacerda-Junior, G. V., Mascarin, G. M., Guimaraes, R. A., Medeiros, F. H. V., Arthurs, S., et al. (2024). Microbial consortia of biological products: do they have a future? Biol. Control 188:105439. doi: 10.1016/j.biocontrol.2024.105439

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Quesada-Moraga, E., González-Mas, N., Yousef-Yousef, M., Garrido-Jurado, I., and Fernández-Bravo, M. (2024). Key role of environmental competence in successful use of entomopathogenic fungi in microbial pest control. J. Pest. Sci. 97, 1–15. doi: 10.1007/s10340-023-01622-8

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Ranadev, P., Nagaraju, K., and Kumari, R. V. (2025). Exploiting the efficacy of entomopathogenic fungi against common floricultural pests: a focus on aphids (Myzus persicae), whiteflies (Bemisia tabaci B-biotype) and Western flower Thrips (Frankliniella occidentalis). J. Agric. Sci. Technol. 27, 847–860. doi: 10.22034/JAST.27.4.847

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Ranesi, M., Vitale, S., Staropoli, A., Di Lelio, I., Izzo, L. G., De Luca, M. G., et al. (2024). Field isolates of Beauveria bassiana exhibit biological heterogeneity in multitrophic interactions of agricultural importance. Microbiol. Res. 286:127819. doi: 10.1016/j.micres.2024.127819

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Rasool, S., Vidkjær, N. H., Hooshmand, K., Jensen, B., Fomsgaard, I. S., and Meyling, N. V. (2021). Seed inoculations with entomopathogenic fungi affect aphid populations coinciding with modulation of plant secondary metabolite profiles across plant families. New Phytol. 229, 1715–1727. doi: 10.1111/nph.16979

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Rehner, S. A., Minnis, A. M., Sung, G.-H., Luangsa-ard, J. J., Devotto, L., and Humber, R. A. (2011). Phylogeny and systematics of the anamorphic, entomopathogenic genus Beauveria. Mycologia 103, 1055–1073. doi: 10.3852/10-302

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Romero, F., Cazzato, S., Walder, F., Vogelgsang, S., Bender, S. F., and van der Heijden, M. G. (2022). Humidity and high temperature are important for predicting fungal disease outbreaks worldwide. New Phytol. 234, 1553–1556. doi: 10.1111/nph.17340

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Ronquist, F., Teslenko, M., Van Der Mark, P., Ayres, D. L., Darling, A., Höhna, S., et al. (2012). MrBayes 3.2: efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space. Syst. Biol. 61, 539–542. doi: 10.1093/sysbio/sys029

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Saminathan, N., Subramanian, J., Sankaran Pagalahalli, S., Theerthagiri, A., and Mariappan, P. (2025). Entomopathogenic fungi: translating research into field applications for crop protection. Arthropod Plant Interact. 19:8. doi: 10.1007/s11829-024-10110-4

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Shehzad, M., Tariq, M., and Siddiqui, J. A. (2025). Entomopathogenic fungi: natural biocontrol of insects, challenges under climate change, advancements and future prospects in modern agriculture. Acta Trop. 269:107751. doi: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2025.107751

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Shin, T. Y., Lee, M. R., Park, S. E., Lee, S. J., Kim, W. J., and Kim, J. S. (2020). Pathogenesis-related genes of entomopathogenic fungi. Arch. Insect Biochem. Physiol. 105:1747. doi: 10.1002/arch.21747

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Sun, T., Chen, Y., Wang, D., Dai, Y. D., Zou, W. Q., Luo, R., et al. (2024). Mitogenomics, phylogeny and morphology reveal two new entomopathogenic species of Ophiocordyceps (Ophiocordycipitaceae, Hypocreales) from South-Western China. MycoKeys 109, 49–72. doi: 10.3897/mycokeys.109.124975

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Vega, F. E. (2018). The use of fungal entomopathogens as endophytes in biological control: a review. Mycologia 110, 4–30. doi: 10.1080/00275514.2017.1418578

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, Z.-Q., Ma, J.-M., Yang, Z.-L., Zhao, J., Yu, Z.-Y., Li, J.-H., et al. (2024). Morphological and phylogenetic analyses reveal three new species of Entomopathogenic Fungi belonging to Clavicipitaceae (Hypocreales, Ascomycota). J. Fungi 10:423. doi: 10.3390/jof10060423

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, H., Yang, J., Finn, D. R., Brunotte, J., and Tebbe, C. C. (2025). Distinct seasonal and annual variability of prokaryotes, fungi and protists in cropland soil under different tillage systems and soil texture. Soil Biol. Biochem. 203:109732. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2025.109732

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Xiang, C.-Y., Gao, F., Jakovlic, I., Lei, H.-P., Hu, Y., Zhang, H., et al. (2023). Using PhyloSuite for molecular phylogeny and tree-based analyses. iMeta 2:e87. doi: 10.1002/imt2.87

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: entomopathogenic fungi, new species, Gongronella, Yunnania, phylogenetics

Citation: Liu T, Chen W, Zhang K, Hu X, Berestetskiy A, Hu Q and Weng Q (2025) Three new entomopathogenic fungal species isolated from soil in China. Front. Microbiol. 16:1705425. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2025.1705425

Received: 15 September 2025; Accepted: 10 October 2025;
Published: 29 October 2025.

Edited by:

Nazia Manzar, National Bureau of Agriculturally Important Microorganisms (ICAR), India

Reviewed by:

Tarun Kumar Patel, Sant Guru Ghasidas Government P.G. College, India
Erfan Septia, Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang, Indonesia

Copyright © 2025 Liu, Chen, Zhang, Hu, Berestetskiy, Hu and Weng. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Qunfang Weng, d2VuZ3dlbmdAc2NhdS5lZHUuY24=

These authors have contributed equally to this work

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.