ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Microbiol.
Sec. Terrestrial Microbiology
This article is part of the Research TopicMicrobe-Environment Interaction Across Grassland Ecosystems: Soil Microbial Diversity, Plant-Microbe Interplay, and Ecosystem FunctionalityView all 10 articles
Soil Bacterial Community Diversity, Composition, and Species Specificity across Different Geographical Landscapes in the Mu Us Sandy Land
Provisionally accepted- 1Yan'an University, Yan'an, China
- 2East China University of Technology, Nanchang, China
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
The Mu Us Sandy Land represents a typical region for ecological restoration in China, characterized by the development of diverse landscapes including desert, meadow patches, arbor forests, and mixed arbor-shrub forests. This study aimed to investigate the diversity, composition, and differential taxa of soil bacterial communities across these distinct geographical landscapes, thereby elucidating the driving mechanisms of vegetation restoration on the sandy land soil microbiome. Soil samples were collected from four typical landscapes in the Mu Us Sandy Land: desert (B), meadow patch (D), arbor forest (T), and mixed arbor-shrub forest (C). High-throughput sequencing of the 16S rRNA gene was performed using the Illumina NextSeq 2000 platform. Our results revealed distinct patterns of bacterial community composition: Actinobacteria dominated the desert (37.42%), while Proteobacteria were more abundant in meadow patches and mixed arbor-shrub forests, and Bacillota were significantly enriched in arbor forests (20.32%).Bioinformatics analysis was conducted using the QIIME2 pipeline, including ASV clustering, beta diversity analysis, community composition analysis, and LEfSe (Linear Discriminant Analysis Effect Size) for multi-level discriminant analysis of differential species. The primary results indicated that the arbor forests and mixed arbor-shrub forests exhibited the highest ASV numbers, suggesting that vegetation restoration enhanced soil bacterial richness. Beta diversity analysis combined with the ANOSIM test (R=0.7168, P=0.001) revealed significant divergence in bacterial community structure among the different landscapes. In terms of community composition, the desert was overwhelmingly dominated by the drought-tolerant phylum Actinobacteria (37.42%). The phylum Proteobacteria was more abundant in meadow patches and mixed arbor-shrub forests, while the proportion of Bacillota was significantly higher in arbor forests (20.32%). LEfSe analysis further identified specific biomarkers for each landscape, such as Rubrobacter and Streptomyces in the desert, and taxa associated with Acidobacteria and Proteobacteria in the mixed arbor-shrub forests. The research demonstrates that the different geographical landscapes in the Mu Us Sandy Land shape distinct soil bacterial communities. From desert to vegetated restoration areas, the bacterial community transitioned from oligotrophic towards copiotrophic groups. The mixed arbor-shrub forest exhibited a more complex community structure compared to the pure arbor forest, indicating its potential as a more sustainable and resilient ecological restoration model.
Keywords: soil microbiome, 16S rRNA gene, high-throughput sequencing, ecological restoration, arid region ecosystem
Received: 03 Oct 2025; Accepted: 24 Nov 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Shang, He, Chen and Jin. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Zhaoquan He
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
