Abstract
Meniere disease (MD) is a heterogeneous clinical condition characterized by sensorineural hearing loss, episodic vestibular symptoms, and tinnitus associated with several comorbidities, such as migraine or autoimmune disorders (AD). The frequency of bilateral involvement may range from 5 to 50%, and it depends on the duration of the disease. We have performed a two-step cluster analysis in 398 patients with bilateral MD (BMD) to identify the best predictors to define clinical subgroups with a potential different etiology to improve the phenotyping of BMD and to develop new treatments. We have defined five clinical variants in BMD. Group 1 is the most frequently found, includes 46% of patients, and is defined by metachronic hearing loss without migraine and without AD. Group 2 is found in 17% of patients, and it is defined by synchronic hearing loss without migraine or AD. Group 3, with 13% of patients, is characterized by familial MD, while group 4, that includes 12% of patients, is associated by the presence of migraine in all cases. Group 5 is found in 11% of patients and is defined by AD. This approach can be helpful in selecting patients for genetic and clinical research. However, further studies will be required to improve the phenotyping in these clinical variants for a better understanding of the diverse etiological factors contributing to BMD.
Introduction
Meniere’s disease (MD) is a long-lasting disorder of the inner ear characterized by episodes of vertigo lasting from 20 min to hours, low-to-middle frequencies sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL, Table 1), tinnitus, and aural fullness (). MD patients have phenotypic heterogeneity (), and it is difficult to define the outcome of the disease in its early stages. Although the frequency of the spells of vertigo is typically greater during the earlier years (–), balance problems are observed during the course of the disease and might become severe if patients progress to a bilateral vestibular hypofunction (, ). Most of the patients start with SNHL in one ear, and it can appear in the other after several years (metachronic SNHL) (), but a significant number of individuals show simultaneous SNHL (synchronic SNHL). Bilateral involvement is a major concern for patients because of the loss of vestibular function, and bilateral SNHL has a significant influence in the health-related quality of life in MD patients ().
Table 1
| AAO-HNS | American Academy Otolaryngology – Head Neck Surgery |
| AD | Autoimmune disorders/disease |
| AIED | Autoimmune inner ear disorder |
| BMD | Bilateral Meniere disease |
| BMD type 1 | Metachronic hearing loss |
| BMD type 2 | Synchronic hearing loss |
| BMD type 3 | Familial Meniere disease |
| BMD type 4 | Meniere disease + migraine |
| BMD type 5 | Meniere disease + autoimmune disease |
| FMD | Familial Meniere disease |
| MD | Meniere disease |
| MRI | Magnetic resonance imaging |
| RCT | Randomized clinical trials |
| SNHL | Sensorineural hearing loss |
| SMD | Sporadic Meniere disease |
List of abbreviations.
Several studies have reported contralateral ear involvement between 2 and 73% of cases, depending on the interval of follow-up and the diagnostic criteria used. However, if bilateral MD (BMD) was defined as the combination of clinical symptoms and audiometric tests, the frequency would be 2–47% (). Some studies describe an interval of 5 years where the incidence was 10–35% (, –), while in other studies, with a follow-up of 10 years or more, the frequency of BMD ranges from 20 (–) to 46% (). However, more than 20 years of follow-up have also been described, and the incidence rate of bilaterality rises up to 47% (–). Although there is a great disparity in the percentage of individuals with bilateral involvement, most of the studies highlighted that the number of patients with contralateral ear involvement increased with the duration of the disease (, , ).
Several comorbidities have been associated with MD, including autoimmune disorders and migraine. So, MD has been previously associated with several autoimmune diseases, such as systemic lupus erythematous, psoriasis, or rheumatoid arthritis (, ), and autoimmunity has been suggested as a potential cause in MD () relying on the results of proteomic studies achieved in small series of patients (–). However, high levels of circulating immune complexes were not found in most of the patients with MD (). Furthermore, autoimmune mechanisms seem to be associated with the pathogenesis of some types of SNHL (, ), such as sudden SNHL (), promptly progressive bilateral SNHL (), and MD (–). Additionally, several genes of the immune system have been studied in case–control studies (–), but they have not been replicated. Moreover, some data suggest that allelic variants of MICA and TLR10 genes, involved in the innate immune response, may influence the susceptibility and time course of hearing loss of MD in European population (, ).
Migraine has been consistently found to be more common in MD than in the general population in case–control studies (), but it is not clear if this association has any role in the pathophysiology of MD. Vestibular migraine (VM), the condition of episodic vestibular symptoms linked to migraine spectrum (), may occur in some patients concomitantly with MD ().
Genetic factors are probably relevant in a subset of patients with MD. So, familial MD was first described in 1949 by Brown (), and many studies have described familial cases of MD (). The genetic contribution to MD has been recently reviewed (, ), and there are several evidences to support a genetic origin in MD. These evidences include (a) the prevalence is higher in European descent population than in Asian () or African populations () and (b) familiar aggregation has been observed in 6% in South Korea and 8–9% in Spain (), being DTNA and FAM136A genes involved in autosomal dominant familial MD ().
The aim of this study is to describe the phenotype of patients with BMD, including comorbidities such as autoimmune diseases or familial aggregation, and to perform a cluster analysis to identify clinical variants in BMD.
Materials and Methods
Subjects
A multicenter, cross-sectional retrospective study was designed, including patients with BMD diagnosed and tracked by the Meniere’s Disease Consortium. For this, the clinical records of a total of 405 patients diagnosed with definite BMD from 16 clinical centers in Spain and Portugal were reviewed in March 2016. MD diagnosis was established according to the diagnostic scale of the American Academy of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery (AAO-HNS) (). Familial MD (FMD) was defined if at least another relative (first or second degree) fulfilled all the criteria of definite or probable MD, according to the criteria established by the Barany Society International Classification for Vestibular Disorders (). Patients with unilateral MD or bilateral BMD with less than 5 years of evolution were excluded of the study. Seven patients were excluded because of inconsistent data. This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board for Clinical Research (PI-13-1242).
Every patient underwent a complete neuro-otological evaluation, including a pure-tone audiometry, an otoscopy, nystagmus examination, and a caloric testing. A brain MRI was performed to exclude any other possible cause of neurological symptoms. Patients with simultaneous SNHL in both ears were considered to have synchronic SNHL, while metachronic SNHL was considered if an interval longer than 1 month between the first and the second ear was observed.
Clinical variables studied were as follows: gender, duration of disease, age of onset, family history of MD, hearing loss at diagnosis, hearing stage defined as four-tone average of 0.5, 1, 2, and 3 kHz according to the AAO-HNS criteria (stage 1, ≤25 dB; stage 2, 26–40 dB; stage 3, 41–70 dB, and stage 4, >70 dB), type of headache (migraine, tension-type headache), history of autoimmune disease (AD), cardiovascular risk factors (high blood pressure, type 2 diabetes, dyslipidemia, and smoking), Tumarkin crisis, and the Functional Scale of the AAO-HNS.
Statistical Analysis
A descriptive statistical analysis was carried out using SPSS software v.22 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Data are shown as means with their SDs. Quantitative variables were compared using Student’s unpaired T-test. Qualitative variables were compared using crosstabs and Fisher’s exact test. Nominal p-values <0.05 were considered statistically significant.
We carried out a two-step cluster analysis using log-likelihood distance measures, which can detect relationships within a complex dataset between patients with multiple distinct characteristics. It tries to identify homogenous groups of cases based on the distribution of some variables (input variables). The method identifies the groups by running pre-clustering first and then by using hierarchical methods to classify and to find the optimal number of clusters.
Initially, we selected variables showing differences between the clinical groups during the descriptive analysis to test its relevance as predictors of clusters. The procedure was iterated several times until we found the minimum number of homogenous clusters. The final cluster analysis was applied using the four following categorical variables: history of autoimmune disease, onset of hearing loss (synchronic/metachronic), FMD or sporadic cases, and migraine. The four variables included produced a silhouette of cohesion and division of 0.8, indicative of good data partitioning. Two additional variables were added to the model: age of onset <40 years old and gender, although their contribution to refine the clustering was limited.
Results
Three hundred ninety-eight patients with BMD were included in the study. There were 258 sporadic cases and 52 individuals with FMD (20%). Although apparently there were no clinical differences in the phenotype between sporadic and familial cases, FMD had an earlier age of onset (p = 0.003) and a higher prevalence of autoimmune comorbidities (Table 2). So, the distribution of frequencies for the age of onset showed that the number of patients starting before 40 years old was significantly higher in the FMD (Figure 1). Table 3 lists the autoimmune comorbid conditions found, being rheumatoid arthritis the most common in our cohort.
Table 2
| Variables | FMD (n = 52) | SMD (n = 258) | p-value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, mean (SD) | 55.5 (12.7) | 61.5 (11.1) | 0.001 |
| Gender (% women) | 34 (65.4) | 147 (57.0) | 0.28 |
| Age of onset (SD) | 39 (12.9) | 44.8 (13.1) | 0.003 |
|  Age of onset ≤40, n (%) | 28 (53.8) | 96 (37.2) | 0.03 |
| Time course (years), mean (SD) | 16.3 (8.7) | 16.3 (9.4) | 0.96 |
| Synchronic, n (%) | 11 (21.6) | 72 (27.9) | 0.39 |
| Metachronic, n (%) | 40 (78.4) | 186 (72.1) | |
| Hearing loss at diagnosis, mean (SD) | 51.9 (15.5) | 56.6 (17.8) | 0.092 |
| Headache, n (%) | 23 (44.2) | 92 (36.1) | 0.27 |
| Migraine, n (%) | 13 (25.0) | 44 (17.3) | 0.24 |
| Rheumatoid history, n (%) | 10 (20.4) | 25 (9.8) | 0.048 |
| Hearing stage, n (%) | |||
|  1 | 0 (0.0) | 4 (1.6) | 0.58 |
|  2 | 9 (17.6) | 35 (13.6) | |
|  3 | 28 (54.9) | 131 (51.0) | |
|  4 | 14 (27.5) | 87 (33.9) | |
| Cardiovascular risk | |||
|  High blood pressure, n (%) | 13 (26.5) | 93 (39.7) | 0.1 |
|  Dyslipidemia, n (%) | 21 (42.0) | 111 (47.6) | 0.53 |
|  Type 2 diabetes, n (%) | 12 (24.0) | 41 (17.4) | 0.32 |
|  Smoking, n (%) | 15 (30) | 53 (21.5) | 0.2 |
| Tumarkin crisis, n (%) | 17 (35.4) | 63 (25.5) | 0.16 |
| Functional Scale, n (%) | |||
|  1 | 9 (17.6) | 53 (21.3) | 0.81 |
|  2 | 15 (29.4) | 71 (28.5) | |
|  3 | 10 (19.6) | 58 (23.3) | |
|  4 | 7 (13.7) | 35 (14.1) | |
|  5 | 7 (13.7) | 25 (10.0) | |
|  6 | 3 (5.9) | 7 (2.8) | |
Clinical phenotype in sporadic and familial Meniere disease with at least 5 years since the onset of the disease.
SMD, sporadic Meniere disease; FMD, familial Meniere disease.
Significant p values in bold.
Figure 1
Table 3
| Autoimmune diseases | N |
|---|---|
| Rheumatoid arthritis | 10 |
| Fibromyalgia | 6 |
| Arthrosis | 5 |
| Ankylosing spondylitis | 5 |
| Psoriasis | 4 |
| Hypothyroidism | 3 |
| Sjogren syndrome | 3 |
| Type 1 diabetes | 2 |
| Rosacea | 2 |
| Graves–Basedow disease | 2 |
| Systemic lupus erythematous | 2 |
| Psoriatic arthritis | 1 |
| Autoimmune inner ear disease | 1 |
| Polymyalgia rheumatica | 1 |
| Inflammatory bowel disease | 1 |
| Cogan syndrome | 1 |
| Hip synovitis | 1 |
| Carpal tunnel syndrome | 1 |
| Undetermined | 10 |
Autoimmune diseases and other rheumatoid conditions observed in patients with bilateral Meniere disease.
The clinical features in patients with sporadic and FMD were stratified according to the presence or absence of autoimmune comorbidities. In the sporadic cases, headache and migraine were most commonly observed in patients with autoimmune background (62.5 and 33%, respectively) compared with patients without autoimmune comorbidities (33 and 16%), suggesting a potential association between migraine and autoimmunity in patients with sporadic BMD (Table 4).
Table 4
| Variables | Sporadic MD | Familial MD | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AD+ (n = 25) | AD− (n = 230) | p-value | AD+ (n = 10) | AD− (n = 39) | p-value | |
| Age, mean (SD) | 61.7 (9.1) | 61.6 (11.2) | 0.94 | 56.5 (13.8) | 55 (12.4) | 0.74 |
| Gender (% women) | 18 (72.0) | 128 (55.7) | 0.14 | 6 (60.0) | 26 (66.7) | 0.72 |
| Age of onset (SD) | 43.4 (11.0) | 45.2 (13.2) | 0.5 | 35.9 (12.3) | 40.5 (13.0) | 0.31 |
|  Age of onset ≤40, n (%) | 11 (44.0) | 82 (35.7) | 0.51 | 6 (60.0) | 19 (48.7) | 0.73 |
| Time course (years), mean (SD) | 17.4 (8.7) | 16.1 (9.6) | 0.52 | 20.7 (8.9) | 14 (7.0) | 0.01 |
| Hearing loss at diagnosis, mean (SD) | 57.5 (18.3) | 56.7 (17.8) | 0.83 | 52.3 (15.2) | 52 (15.9) | 0.96 |
| Headache, n (%) | 15 (62.5) | 77 (33.5) | 0.007 | 8 (80.0) | 14 (35.9) | 0.03 |
| Migraine, n (%) | 8 (33.3) | 36 (15.7) | 0.044 | 5 (50.0) | 7 (17.9) | 0.05 |
| Hearing stage, n (%) | ||||||
|  1 | 0 (0.0) | 4 (1.7) | 0.37 | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0.32 |
|  2 | 5 (20.0) | 30 (13.1) | 1 (11.1) | 8 (20.5) | ||
|  3 | 9 (36.0) | 119 (52.0) | 4 (44.4) | 23 (59.0) | ||
|  4 | 11 (44.0) | 76 (33.2) | 4 (44.4) | 8 (20.5) | ||
| Cardiovascular risk factors | ||||||
|  High blood pressure, n (%) | 13 (59.1) | 80 (37.7) | 0.07 | 2 (20.0) | 10 (27.0) | 1 |
|  Dyslipidemia, n (%) | 12 (50.0) | 97 (46.9) | 0.83 | 4 (40.0) | 16 (42.1) | 1 |
|  Type 2 diabetes, n (%) | 8 (33.3) | 33 (15.8) | 0.046 | 5 (50.0) | 7 (18.4) | 0.09 |
|  Smoking, n (%) | 6 (28.6) | 47 (21.0) | 0.41 | 3 (30.0) | 12 (30.8) | 1 |
| Tumarkin crisis, n (%) | 6 (27.3) | 57 (25.3) | 0.8 | 5 (50.0) | 12 (32.4) | 0.46 |
| Functional Scale, n (%) | ||||||
|  1 | 4 (17.4) | 48 (21.3) | 0.94 | 2 (20.0) | 7 (17.9) | 0.007 |
|  2 | 7 (30.4) | 64 (28.4) | 4 (40.0) | 11 (28.2) | ||
|  3 | 6 (26.1) | 52 (23.1) | 1 (10.0) | 8 (20.5) | ||
|  4 | 2 (8.7) | 33 (14.7) | 0 (0.0) | 6 (15.4) | ||
|  5 | 3 (13.0) | 22 (9.8) | 0 (0.0) | 7 (17.9) | ||
|  6 | 1 (4.3) | 6 (2.7) | 3 (30.0) | 0 (0.0) | ||
Clinical features of sporadic and familial bilateral Meniere disease stratified by the presence of autoimmune disease (AD).
Significant p values in bold.
We also compared patients according to the onset of hearing loss (Table 5). One hundred three (26%) individuals developed simultaneous hearing loss in both ears (synchronic hearing loss, either symmetric or asymmetric), while 291 (73%) patients started with hearing loss in one ear and developed the hearing loss in the contralateral ear (metachronic hearing loss). Figure 2 compares the distribution of frequencies for the age of onset in patients with synchronic or metachronic hearing loss. There were no clinical differences between them, but the occurrence of headache was most commonly observed in synchronic hearing loss (p = 0.0004), and the worst hearing stage was observed in patients with metachronic hearing loss (p = 0.004).
Table 5
| Variables | Synchronic (n = 103) | Metachronic (n = 291) | p-value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, mean (SD) | 61 (11.0) | 60.1 (11.9) | 0.49 |
| Gender (% women) | 63 (61.2) | 161 (55.3) | 0.36 |
| Age of onset (SD) | 46.1 (12.8) | 43.5 (13.2) | 0.07 |
|  Age of onset ≤40, n (%) | 39 (37.9) | 118 (40.5) | 0.73 |
| Time course (years), mean (SD) | 14.4 (8.9) | 16.2 (8.9) | 0.08 |
| Family history, n (%) | 39 (39.8) | 119 (43.0) | 0.64 |
|  FMD, n (%) | 11 (13.3) | 40 (17.7) | 0.39 |
| Hearing loss at diagnosis, mean (SD) | 55.1 (17.0) | 55.9 (17.0) | 0.71 |
| Headache, n (%) | 55 (53.4) | 96 (33.3) | 0.0004 |
| Migraine, n (%) | 25 (24.3) | 49 (17.0) | 0.11 |
| Rheumatoid history, n (%) | 15 (15.0) | 35 (12.2) | 0.49 |
| Hearing stage, n (%) | |||
|  1 | 1 (1.0) | 6 (2.1) | 0.004 |
|  2 | 27 (26.5) | 34 (11.7) | |
|  3 | 42 (41.2) | 152 (52.4) | |
|  4 | 32 (31.4) | 98 (33.8) | |
| Cardiovascular risk | |||
|  High blood pressure, n (%) | 47 (51.1) | 109 (39.9) | 0.068 |
|  Dyslipidemia, n (%) | 53 (55.2) | 121 (45.1) | 0.097 |
|  Type 2 diabetes, n (%) | 13 (13.5) | 50 (18.5) | 0.35 |
|  Smoking, n (%) | 22 (21.8) | 68 (24.5) | 0.68 |
| Tumarkin crisis, n (%) | 24 (25.8) | 69 (24.9) | 0.89 |
| Functional Scale, n (%) | |||
|  1 | 14 (14.0) | 73 (26.0) | 0.11 |
|  2 | 29 (29.0) | 77 (27.4) | |
|  3 | 26 (26.0) | 55 (19.6) | |
|  4 | 12 (12.0) | 40 (14.2) | |
|  5 | 16 (16.0) | 27 (9.6) | |
|  6 | 3 (3.0) | 9 (3.2) | |
Clinical features in bilateral Meniere disease according to the onset of hearing loss.
Significant p values in bold.
Figure 2
We performed cluster analysis to identify groups of patients with common clinical features in BMD. Figure 3 shows the size of the clusters, the relevance of predictors, and the contribution of each predictor to define the cluster. The best predictors for clustering were autoimmune history, FMD, migraine, and the onset of hearing loss (synchronic/metachronic). Ninety-five patients remained unclassified because of incomplete clinical data.
Figure 3
We have defined five clusters for BMD and ranked them according to its relative frequency (Figure 4). Cluster 1 is the most common, including 46.5% of patients, and it is defined by metachronic hearing loss without migraine, sporadic BMD, and no autoimmune history. Cluster 2 (17.5%) includes patients with synchronic hearing loss, sporadic BMD, no migraine, and no autoimmune history. Cluster 3 (12.9%) includes patients with FMD without migraine in 82% of patients. Cluster 4 (11.9%) consists of patients with migraine and sporadic BMD. Cluster 5 (11.2%) groups all patients with autoimmune comorbidities, being 71% sporadic and 29% FMD.
Figure 4
Table 6 shows the five groups found and the major clinical differences among the groups. Comparing the age of onset by groups, we observe that groups 3–5 have earlier onsets than groups 1 and 2 (p = 0.0003). The type of hearing loss, FMD, migraine, and autoimmune comorbidities strongly differ among groups, and these variables are the basis to assign a given patient to each cluster.
Table 6
| Variables | BMD type 1 (n = 141) | BMD type 2 (n = 53) | BMD type 3 |(n = 39) | BMD type 4 (n = 36) | BMD type 5 (n = 34) | p-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group predictor | Metachronic SNHL | Synchronic SNHL | FMD | Migraine | AD | |
| Age, mean (SD) | 63.3 (11.0) | 62.4 (9.5) | 54.7 (13.2) | 54.1 (11.5) | 59.7 (11.1) | 0.00001 |
| Gender (% women) | 73 (51.8) | 30 (56.6) | 26 (66.7) | 25 (69.4) | 24 (70.6) | 0.11 |
| Age of onset (SD) | 46.4 (13.1) | 47.9 (12.0) | 40 (14.5) | 37 (12.5) | 39.8 (11.3) | 0.0003 |
|  Age of onset ≤40, n (%) | 46 (32.6) | 15 (28.3) | 19 (48.7) | 21 (58.3) | 16 (47.1) | 0.011 |
| Synchronic, n (%) | 0 (0.0) | 53 (100.0) | 7 (17.9) | 8 (22.2) | 13 (38.2) | 3.39 × 10−42 |
| Metachronic, n (%) | 141 (100.0) | 0 (0.0) | 32 (82.1) | 28 (77.8) | 21 (61.8) | |
| Family history, n (%) | 18 (12.8) | 7 (13.2) | 39 (100.0) | 7 (19.4) | 19 (55.9) | 1.81 × 10−27 |
|  FMD, n (%) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 39 (100.0) | 0 (0.0) | 10 (29.4) | 4.10 × 10−53 |
| Headache, n (%) | 22 (15.6) | 20 (37.7) | 14 (35.9) | 36 (100.0) | 23 (67.6) | 4.88 × 10−20 |
| Migraine, n (%) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 7 (17.9) | 36 (100.0) | 13 (38.2) | 1.21 × 10−44 |
| Rheumatoid history, n (%) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 34 (100.0) | 2.44 × 10−64 |
| Cardiovascular risk factors | ||||||
|  High blood pressure, n (%) | 46 (34.3) | 23 (50.0) | 10 (27.0) | 11 (34.4) | 15 (46.9) | 0.15 |
|  Dyslipidemia, n (%) | 58 (45.3) | 26 (53.1) | 16 (42.1) | 13 (43.3) | 15 (45.5) | 0.86 |
|  Type 2 diabetes, n (%) | 23 (17.8) | 9 (18.4) | 7 (18.4) | 1 (3.2) | 12 (36.4) | 0.019 |
|  Smoking, n (%) | 31 (22.6) | 10 (18.9) | 12 (30.8) | 6 (17.1) | 9 (29.0) | 0.53 |
Clinical variants in bilateral Meniere disease (BMD) defined by two-step cluster analysis.
Significant p values in bold.
Discussion
The diagnostic criteria for MD formulated by the Classification Committee of the Bárány Society state that bilateral involvement is determined by hearing loss defined in the audiogram (). So, if the absolute thresholds for bone-conducted sound are ≥35 dB HL at each of two contiguous frequencies below 2000 Hz in both ears, and the patient has experienced ≥2 episodes of spontaneous vertigo each lasting 20 min to 12 h associated with fluctuating aural symptoms, the diagnosis of definite BMD is established. The notes added to the definition also describe a second clinical variant when the patient develops simultaneous bilateral SNHL (symmetric or asymmetric) (, ), but no further clinical information was included in the definition.
Our study demonstrates that BMD is a heterogeneous disorder, and two-step cluster analysis is a very useful tool to define groups of patients with BMD according to four clinical predictors: FMD, autoimmune history, migraine, and the type of onset for hearing loss. We selected this method since it allows the inclusion of quantitative and categorical variables to define clusters ().
We present a new classification for BMD in five groups of patients with potential etiological implications, which probably will improve the diagnostic workflow and the management of patients with BMD. Previous studies in patients with BMD were focused in the diagnosis by electrocochleography or MRI (–), but they did not consider the comorbidities commonly observed, such as migraine or AD in some cases. The phenotype of a patient with an episodic vestibular syndrome should not be limited to the description of the inner ear symptoms, skipping crucial information such as the familiar history of MD or migraine. Furthermore, the comorbidities of migraine or AD may explain the perception of MD as a continuum, which overlaps with migraine () or autoimmune inner ear disease (, , ).
The most remarkable finding in our study is that the five groups of patients identified do not overlap themselves, and each of them has a set of features able to define the group.
Bilateral MD type 1 is the most common clinical variant, and it includes patients with MD in one ear (unilateral MD), and they develop the hearing loss in the contralateral ear (conversion from unilateral to BMD). The mean age of onset was 46 years old, comparable to BMD type 2, but it is significantly higher than it was observed in the rest of the groups (types 3, 4, or 5). BMD type 1 has no familial or autoimmune history, and patients do not have migraine, so further studies are required to investigate other concurrent comorbidities to determine contributing factors.
Bilateral MD type 2 is the second most frequently observed clinical variant, and fluctuating bilateral SNHL loss may resemble AIED, since simultaneous SNHL with vestibular symptoms can occur in 50% patients with AIED (). However, these patients do not have any autoimmune comorbid conditions, migraine, or familial history of MD. Interestingly, BMD type 2 patients show a vascular risk profile, since 50% of them show high blood pressure, and 53% have dyslipidemia. When we compared these frequencies with BMD type 1, which do not differ in age or sex profile to BMD type 2, they were not significantly different (p = 0.078), but further studies should assess the role of vascular risk factors in labyrinthine microcirculation in MD.
Comparing the hearing stage for the worst ear, it seems to be worse in BMD type 1 (metachronic SNHL) than in type 2 (synchronic SNLH). Since both groups do not differ for the age of onset, duration of disease, or gender distribution, we cannot determine the reason for the severe SNHL in the first ear in BMD type 1.
Bilateral MD type 3 includes all patients with familiar history of MD, and we could subtype them in two subgroups (3a with migraine, 82%, and 3b BMD without migraine 18%). These findings confirm the early description of families with MD co-segregating migraine and MD () and the more recent description of FMD without migraine (, , ). According to this subtyping for FMD, there will be two types of families with MD, with and without migraine, and they reflect the genetic heterogeneity in FMD. The families include patients with uni and BMD, so epigenetic factors may influence uni or bilateral involvement. Most of the described families have an autosomal dominant pattern of inheritance, and the participation of several genes indicate a genetic heterogeneity in FMD (, ). Although variable expressivity and incomplete penetrance was observed, we did not find cases with episodic ataxia in the families.
Bilateral MD type 4 is associated with migraine in all cases, but they do not have familial history of MD. This group may overlap with VM, and it may share common pathophysiological mechanisms (). Patients with MD may show migraine symptoms even during the attacks of vertigo (), and this finding could make difficult the differential diagnosis of VM and MD. Magnetic resonance imaging may be useful in the diagnostic evaluation of patients with the spectrum of VM/MD (MD with concurrent migraine or in cases VM and auditory symptoms) ().
Bilateral MD type 5 could be considered as autoimmune MD, since all patients have another concurrent AD. However, this group is heterogeneous and includes patients with sporadic (71%), FMD (29%), migraine (38%), and both synchronic (38%) and metachronic SNHL (62%). Patients with BMD type 5 and migraine may have either synchronic or metachronic SNHL.
Our study has several limitations. Despite our efforts to improve phenotyping in patients with BMD, we could not classify 95 patients with BMD in any cluster, and they were excluded of the model. In fact, the largest group (BMD type 1) remains poorly characterized, since it is not associated with any particular clinical feature or etiological factor. The role of allergy in MD deserves more research efforts, since a high prevalence of sensitization to inhalant or food allergies have been reported in MD (–).
However, the recognizing of different subgroups of patients and the definition of clinical variants in BMD is not only the first step to improve the selection of patients for genetic and immunological studies but also for randomized clinical trials (RCT). Most of the RCT performed in MD, were not able to demonstrate any effects of diuretics () or betahistine () and had limited effectiveness for intratympanic gentamicin () or steroids (), and these results could be explained by a biased selection of patients with different etiologies. Further phenotyping of these clinical variants are needed for a better understanding of the clinical heterogeneity observed in BMD.
Statements
Author contributions
LF and JL-E conceived and designed the study. AS-V, SS-P, AB-C, VP-G, HP-G, JF, EM-S, MT, GT, AG-A, RG-A, JE-S, PM, PP, JB, and JL-E collected clinical information. LF and JL-E analyzed the data and drafted the manuscript. LF, AS-V, SS-P, AB-C, VP-G, HP-G, JF, EM-S, MT, GT, AG-A, RG-A, JE-S, PM, PP, JB, and JL-E revised and approved the final version of the manuscript.
Funding
This study was funded by a PI13/1242 Grant from ISCIII by FEDER funds from the EU.
Acknowledgments
We acknowledge to all members of the Meniere disease’s Consortium (MeDiC), a network of clinical and research centers contributing to the study of Meniere’s disease. List of participants in MeDiC: Juan Carlos Amor-Dorado (Hospital Can Misses Ibiza, Spain), IA (Complexo Hospitalario de Pontevedra, Spain), AB-C (Hospital Universitario Salamanca, Spain), JB (Hospital Universitario de Gran Canaria Dr. Negrin, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain), JE-S (Hospital San Agustin Linares, Spain), JF (Hospital Miguel Servet, Zaragoza, Spain), AG-A (Hospital Universitario Vall d’Hebron, Barcelona, Spain), RG-A (Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla, Santander), JL-E (Complejo Hospitalario Universidad de Granada, Spain), Raquel Manrique Huarte, Nicolas Perez-Fernandez (Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Spain), PM (Centro Hospitalar de São João, Porto, Portugal), EM-S, Ricardo Sanz (Hospital Universitario de Getafe, Madrid, Spain), Manuel Oliva Dominguez (Hospital Costa del Sol Marbella, Spain), PP (Hospital Cabueñes, Asturias, Spain), HP-G, VP-G (Hospital La Fe, Valencia, Spain), SS-P, AS-V (Complexo Hospitalario Universitario, Santiago de Compostela, Spain), MT (Instituto Antolà Candela, Madrid, Spain), Roberto Teggi (San Raffaelle Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy), and GT (Complejo Hospitalario Badajoz, Spain).
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
References
1
Lopez-EscamezJACareyJChungWHGoebelJAMagnussonMMandalaMet alDiagnostic criteria for Meniere’s disease. J Vestib Res (2015) 25(1):1–7.10.3233/VES-150549
2
RequenaTEspinosa-SanchezJMCabreraSTrinidadGSoto-VarelaASantos-PerezSet alFamilial clustering and genetic heterogeneity in Meniere’s disease. Clin Genet (2014) 85(3):245–52.10.1111/cge.12150
3
StahleJFribergUSvedbergA. Long-term progression of Meniere’s disease. Am J Otol (1989) 10(3):170–3.
4
BelinchonAPerez-GarriguesHTeniasJM. Evolution of symptoms in Meniere’s disease. Audiol Neurootol (2012) 17(2):126–32.10.1159/000331945
5
Perez-GarriguesHLopez-EscamezJAPerezPSanzROrtsMMarcoJet alTime course of episodes of definitive vertigo in Meniere’s disease. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg (2008) 134(11):1149–54.10.1001/archotol.134.11.1149
6
GazquezISoto-VarelaAAranISantosSBatuecasATrinidadGet alHigh prevalence of systemic autoimmune diseases in patients with Meniere’s disease. PLoS One (2011) 6(10):e26759.10.1371/journal.pone.0026759
7
HuppertDStruppMBrandtT. Long-term course of Meniere’s disease revisited. Acta Otolaryngol (2010) 130(6):644–51.10.3109/00016480903382808
8
HouseJWDohertyJKFisherLMDereberyMJBerlinerKI. Meniere’s disease: prevalence of contralateral ear involvement. Otol Neurotol (2006) 27(3):355–61.10.1097/00129492-200604000-00011
9
Lopez-EscamezJAVicianaDGarrido-FernandezP. Impact of bilaterality and headache on health-related quality of life in Meniere’s disease. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol (2009) 118(6):409–16.
10
KitaharaMMatsubaraHTakedaTYazawaY. Bilateral Meniere’s disease. Adv Otorhinolaryngol (1979) 25:117–21.10.1159/000402927
11
PaparellaMMGriebieMS. Bilaterality of Meniere’s disease. Acta Otolaryngol (1984) 97(3–4):233–7.10.3109/00016488409130984
12
RosenbergSSilversteinHFlanzerJWanamakerH. Bilateral Meniere’s disease in surgical versus nonsurgical patients. Am J Otol (1991) 12(5):336–40.
13
PalaskasCWDobieRASnyderJM. Progression of hearing loss in bilateral Meniere’s disease. Laryngoscope (1988) 98(3):287–90.10.1288/00005537-198803000-00009
14
TokumasuKFujinoAYoshioSHoshinoI. Prognosis of Meniere’s disease by conservative treatment: retrospective study on the time course of the disease. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl (1995) 519:216–8.10.3109/00016489509121908
15
TokumasuKFujinoANaganumaHHoshinoIAraiM. Initial symptoms and retrospective evaluation of prognosis in Meniere’s disease. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl (1996) 524:43–9.10.3109/00016489609124348
16
ChavesAGBoariLLei MunhozMS. The outcome of patients with Menieres disease. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol (2007) 73(3):346–50.10.1016/S1808-8694(15)30078-1
17
BalkanyTJSiresBArenbergIK. Bilateral aspects of Meniere’s disease: an underestimated clinical entity. Otolaryngol Clin North Am (1980) 13(4):603–9.
18
GreenJDJrBlumDJHarnerSG. Longitudinal followup of patients with Meniere’s disease. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg (1991) 104(6):783–8.10.1177/019459989110400603
19
StahleJFribergUSvedbergA. Long-term progression of Meniere’s disease. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl (1991) 485:78–83.10.3109/00016489109128047
20
HaviaMKentalaE. Progression of symptoms of dizziness in Meniere’s disease. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg (2004) 130(4):431–5.10.1001/archotol.130.4.431
21
FribergUStahleJSvedbergA. The natural course of Meniere’s disease. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl (1984) 406:72–7.
22
MorrisonAW. Predictive tests for Meniere’s disease. Am J Otol (1986) 7(1):5–10.
23
TyrrellJSWhinneyDJUkoumunneOCFlemingLEOsborneNJ. Prevalence, associated factors, and comorbid conditions for Meniere’s disease. Ear Hear (2014) 35(4):e162–9.10.1097/AUD.0000000000000041
24
KimSHKimJYLeeHJGiMKimBGChoiJY. Autoimmunity as a candidate for the etiopathogenesis of Meniere’s disease: detection of autoimmune reactions and diagnostic biomarker candidate. PLoS One (2014) 9(10):e111039.10.1371/journal.pone.0111039
25
ChiarellaGSaccomannoMScumaciDGaspariMFanielloMCQuaresimaBet alProteomics in Meniere disease. J Cell Physiol (2012) 227(1):308–12.10.1002/jcp.22737
26
ChiarellaGDi DomenicoMPetroloCSaccomannoMRothenbergerRGiordanoAet alA proteomics-driven assay defines specific plasma protein signatures in different stages of Meniere’s disease. J Cell Biochem (2014) 115(6):1097–100.10.1002/jcb.24747
27
Lopez-EscamezJASaenz-LopezPGazquezIMorenoAGonzalez-OllerCSoto-VarelaAet alPolymorphisms of CD16A and CD32 Fcgamma receptors and circulating immune complexes in Meniere’s disease: a case-control study. BMC Med Genet (2011) 12:2.10.1186/1471-2350-12-2
28
BrandOGoughSHewardJ. HLA, CTLA-4 and PTPN22: the shared genetic master-key to autoimmunity?Expert Rev Mol Med (2005) 7(23):1–15.10.1017/S1462399405009981
29
McCabeBF. Autoimmune sensorineural hearing loss. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol (1979) 88(5 Pt 1):585–9.10.1177/000348947908800501
30
Amor-DoradoJCPacoLMartinJLopez-NevotMAGonzalez-GayMA. Human leukocyte antigen-DQB1 and -DRB1 associations in patients with idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss from a defined population of Northwest Spain. Acta Otolaryngol (2005) 125(12):1277–82.10.1080/00016480510012228
31
HarrisJPWeismanMHDereberyJMEspelandMAGantzBJGulyaAJet alTreatment of corticosteroid-responsive autoimmune inner ear disease with methotrexate: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA (2003) 290(14):1875–83.10.1001/jama.290.14.1875
32
HughesGBKinneySEBarnaBPCalabreseLH. Autoimmune reactivity in Meniere’s disease: a preliminary report. Laryngoscope (1983) 93(4):410–7.
33
YooTJSheaJJrGeXKwonSSYazawaYSenerOet alPresence of autoantibodies in the sera of Meniere’s disease. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol (2001) 110(5 Pt 1):425–9.10.1177/000348940111000506
34
FattoriBNacciADardanoADallanIGrossoMTrainoCet alPossible association between thyroid autoimmunity and Meniere’s disease. Clin Exp Immunol (2008) 152(1):28–32.10.1111/j.1365-2249.2008.03595.x
35
FurutaTTeranishiMUchidaYNishioNKatoKOtakeHet alAssociation of interleukin-1 gene polymorphisms with sudden sensorineural hearing loss and Meniere’s disease. Int J Immunogenet (2011) 38(3):249–54.10.1111/j.1744-313X.2011.01004.x
36
GazquezIMorenoARequenaTOhmenJSantos-PerezSAranIet alFunctional variants of MIF, INFG and TFNA genes are not associated with disease susceptibility or hearing loss progression in patients with Meniere’s disease. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol (2013) 270(4):1521–9.10.1007/s00405-012-2268-0
37
Lopez-EscamezJASaenz-LopezPAcostaLMorenoAGazquezIPerez-GarriguesHet alAssociation of a functional polymorphism of PTPN22 encoding a lymphoid protein phosphatase in bilateral Meniere’s disease. Laryngoscope (2010) 120(1):103–7.10.1002/lary.20650
38
CabreraSSanchezERequenaTMartinez-BuenoMBenitezJPerezNet alIntronic variants in the NFKB1 gene may influence hearing forecast in patients with unilateral sensorineural hearing loss in Meniere’s disease. PLoS One (2014) 9(11):e112171.10.1371/journal.pone.0112171
39
GazquezIMorenoAAranISoto-VarelaASantosSPerez-GarriguesHet alMICA-STR A.4 is associated with slower hearing loss progression in patients with Meniere’s disease. Otol Neurotol (2012) 33(2):223–9.10.1097/MAO.0b013e31824296c8
40
RequenaTGazquezIMorenoABatuecasAAranISoto-VarelaAet alAllelic variants in TLR10 gene may influence bilateral affectation and clinical course of Meniere’s disease. Immunogenetics (2013) 65(5):345–55.10.1007/s00251-013-0683-z
41
RadtkeALempertTGrestyMABrookesGBBronsteinAMNeuhauserH. Migraine and Meniere’s disease: is there a link?Neurology (2002) 59(11):1700–4.10.1212/01.WNL.0000036903.22461.39
42
LempertTOlesenJFurmanJWaterstonJSeemungalBCareyJet alVestibular migraine: diagnostic criteria. J Vestib Res (2012) 22(4):167–72.10.3233/VES-2012-0453
43
NeffBAStaabJPEggersSDCarlsonMLSchmittWRVan AbelKMet alAuditory and vestibular symptoms and chronic subjective dizziness in patients with Meniere’s disease, vestibular migraine, and Meniere’s disease with concomitant vestibular migraine. Otol Neurotol (2012) 33(7):1235–44.10.1097/MAO.0b013e31825d644a
44
BrownMR. The factor of heredity in labyrinthine deafness and paroxysmal vertigo; Meniere’s syndrome. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol (1949) 58(3):665–70.
45
MorrisonAWBaileyMEMorrisonGA. Familial Meniere’s disease: clinical and genetic aspects. J Laryngol Otol (2009) 123(1):29–37.10.1017/S0022215108002788
46
RequenaTEspinosa-SanchezJMLopez-EscamezJA. Genetics of dizziness: cerebellar and vestibular disorders. Curr Opin Neurol (2014) 27(1):98–104.10.1097/WCO.0000000000000053
47
FrejoLGieglingITeggiRLopez-EscamezJARujescuD. Genetics of vestibular disorders: pathophysiological insights. J Neurol (2016) 263(Suppl 1):45–53.10.1007/s00415-015-7988-9
48
LeeJMKimMJJungJKimHJSeoYJKimSH. Genetic aspects and clinical characteristics of familial Meniere’s disease in a South Korean population. Laryngoscope (2015) 125(9):2175–80.10.1002/lary.25207
49
OhmenJDWhiteCHLiXWangJFisherLMZhangHet alGenetic evidence for an ethnic diversity in the susceptibility to Meniere’s disease. Otol Neurotol (2013) 34(7):1336–41.10.1097/MAO.0b013e3182868818
50
RequenaTCabreraSMartin-SierraCPriceSDLysakowskiALopez-EscamezJA. Identification of two novel mutations in FAM136A and DTNA genes in autosomal-dominant familial Meniere’s disease. Hum Mol Genet (2015) 24(4):1119–26.10.1093/hmg/ddu524
51
Committee on Hearing and Equilibrium guidelines for the diagnosis and evaluation of therapy in Meniere’s disease. American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Foundation, Inc. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg (1995) 113(3):181–5.10.1016/S0194-5998(95)70102-8
52
BelinchonAPerez-GarriguesHTeniasJMLopezA. Hearing assessment in Meniere’s disease. Laryngoscope (2011) 121(3):622–6.10.1002/lary.21335
53
TylerRCoelhoCTaoPJiHNobleWGehringerAet alIdentifying tinnitus subgroups with cluster analysis. Am J Audiol (2008) 17(2):S176–84.10.1044/1059-0889(2008/07-0044)
54
NabiSParnesLS. Bilateral Meniere’s disease. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg (2009) 17(5):356–62.10.1097/MOO.0b013e3283304cb3
55
MoritaNKariyaSFarajzadeh DeroeeACureogluSNomiyaSNomiyaRet alMembranous labyrinth volumes in normal ears and Meniere disease: a three-dimensional reconstruction study. Laryngoscope (2009) 119(11):2216–20.10.1002/lary.20723
56
NonoyamaHTanigawaTTamakiTTanakaHYamamuroOUedaH. Evidence for bilateral endolymphatic hydrops in ipsilateral delayed endolymphatic hydrops: preliminary results from examination of five cases. Acta Otolaryngol (2014) 134(3):221–6.10.3109/00016489.2013.850741
57
Lopez-EscamezJADlugaiczykJJacobsJLempertTTeggiRvon BrevernMet alAccompanying symptoms overlap during attacks in Meniere’s disease and vestibular migraine. Front Neurol (2014) 5:265.10.3389/fneur.2014.00265
58
PathakSHatamLJBonaguraVVambutasA. Innate immune recognition of molds and homology to the inner ear protein, cochlin, in patients with autoimmune inner ear disease. J Clin Immunol (2013) 33(7):1204–15.10.1007/s10875-013-9926-x
59
EisenMDNiparkoJK. Chapter 31 – autoimmune inner ear disease. In: EggersSDZZeeDS, editors. Handbook of Clinical Neurophysiology (Vol. 9), Elsevier (2010). p. 428–32.
60
OliveiraCAFerrariIMessiasCI. Occurrence of familial Meniere’s syndrome and migraine in Brasilia. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol (2002) 111(3 Pt 1):229–36.10.1177/000348940211100307
61
Arweiler-HarbeckDHorsthemkeBJahnkeKHenniesHC. Genetic aspects of familial Meniere’s disease. Otol Neurotol (2011) 32(4):695–700.10.1097/MAO.0b013e318216074a
62
HietikkoEKotimakiJKentalaEKlockarsTSorriMMannikkoM. Finnish familial Meniere disease is not linked to chromosome 12p12.3, and anticipation and cosegregation with migraine are not common findings. Genet Med (2011) 13(5):415–20.10.1097/GIM.0b013e3182091a41
63
Espinosa-SanchezJMLopez-EscamezJA. New Insights into pathophysiology of vestibular migraine. Front Neurol (2015) 6:12.10.3389/fneur.2015.00012
64
GurkovRKantnerCStruppMFlatzWKrauseEErtl-WagnerB. Endolymphatic hydrops in patients with vestibular migraine and auditory symptoms. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol (2014) 271(10):2661–7.10.1007/s00405-013-2751-2
65
Di BerardinoFCesaraniA. Gluten sensitivity in Meniere’s disease. Laryngoscope (2012) 122(3):700–2.10.1002/lary.22492
66
DereberyMJ. Allergic and immunologic features of Meniere’s disease. Otolaryngol Clin North Am (2011) 44(3):655–66, ix.10.1016/j.otc.2011.03.004
67
PowersWH. Allergic factors in Meniere’s disease. Trans Am Acad Ophthalmol Otolaryngol (1973) 77(1):ORL22–9.
68
ThirlwallASKunduS. Diuretics for Meniere’s disease or syndrome. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (2006) (3):CD003599.10.1002/14651858.CD003599.pub2
69
AdrionCFischerCSWagnerJGurkovRMansmannUStruppMet alEfficacy and safety of betahistine treatment in patients with Meniere’s disease: primary results of a long term, multicentre, double blind, randomised, placebo controlled, dose defining trial (BEMED trial). BMJ (2016) 352:h6816.10.1136/bmj.h6816
70
PullensBvan BenthemPP. Intratympanic gentamicin for Meniere’s disease or syndrome. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (2011) (3):CD008234.10.1002/14651858.CD008234.pub2
71
PhillipsJSWesterbergB. Intratympanic steroids for Meniere’s disease or syndrome. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (2011) (7):CD008514.10.1002/14651858.CD008514.pub2
Summary
Keywords
cluster analysis, vestibular disorders, hearing loss, tinnitus, Meniere’s disease, migraine, autoimmune disorders, inner ear
Citation
Frejo L, Soto-Varela A, Santos-Perez S, Aran I, Batuecas-Caletrio A, Perez-Guillen V, Perez-Garrigues H, Fraile J, Martin-Sanz E, Tapia MC, Trinidad G, GarcÃa-Arumi AM, González-Aguado R, Espinosa-Sanchez JM, Marques P, Perez P, Benitez J and Lopez-Escamez JA (2016) Clinical Subgroups in Bilateral Meniere Disease. Front. Neurol. 7:182. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2016.00182
Received
09 May 2016
Accepted
07 October 2016
Published
24 October 2016
Volume
7 - 2016
Edited by
Herman Kingma, Maastricht University Medical Center, Netherlands
Reviewed by
Maurizio Barbara, Sapienza University, Italy; Hong Ju Park, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan, South Korea
Updates
Copyright
© 2016 Frejo, Soto-Varela, Santos-Perez, Aran, Batuecas-Caletrio, Perez-Guillen, Perez-Garrigues, Fraile, Martin-Sanz, Tapia, Trinidad, GarcÃa-Arumi, González-Aguado, Espinosa-Sanchez, Marques, Perez, Benitez and Lopez-Escamez On Behalf of the Meniere’s Disease Consortium (MeDiC).
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Jose A. Lopez-Escamez, antonio.lopezescamez@genyo.es
Specialty section: This article was submitted to Neuro-otology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Neurology
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.